The disclosure pertains to iron type golf clubs.
The performance of golf equipment is continuously advancing due to the introduction of advanced materials to both golf clubs (irons, woods, and putters) and balls, as well as the development of innovative clubs and club designs such as high loft woods and oversize drivers. While all clubs in the golfer's bag are important, both scratch and novice golfers rely on the performance and feel of their irons for many commonly encountered playing situations.
Irons are generally configured in a set that includes clubs of varying loft, with shaft lengths and clubhead weights selected to maintain an approximately constant “swing weight” so that the golfer perceives a common “feel” or “balance” in swinging both the low irons and high irons in a set. The size of an iron's “sweet spot” is generally related to the size (i.e., surface area) of the iron's striking face, and iron sets are available with oversize club heads to provide a large sweet spot that is desirable to many golfers.
Conventional “blade” type irons have been largely displaced (especially for novice golfers) by so-called “perimeter weighted” irons, which include “cavity-back” and “hollow” iron designs. Cavity-back irons have a cavity directly behind the striking plate, which permits club head mass to be distributed about the perimeter of the striking plate, and such clubs tend to be more forgiving to off-center hits. Hollow irons have features similar to cavity-back irons, but the cavity is enclosed by a rear wall to form a hollow region behind the striking plate. Perimeter weighted, cavity back, and hollow iron designs permit club designers to redistribute club head mass to achieve intended playing characteristics associated with, for example, placement of club head center of mass or a moment of inertia.
While perimeter-weighted designs offer more design possibilities than blade type designs, perimeter weighting can result in clubs with an undesirable “feel.” In addition, even with perimeter weighting, significant portions of club head mass, such as the mass associated with the striking plate, are unavailable for redistribution. Additional design flexibility is needed for improved club heads and clubs.
A cavity back iron type club head includes a striking plate having a substantially planar striking surface and a rear surface defining a thickness therebetween. The rear surface defines a striking plate rear cavity region. A perimeter support is coupled to a peripheral portion of the striking plate. The surface area of the striking surface is related to the club head loft angle by the equation SSA≥14.4(L)+2875, where SSA is the surface area of the striking surface in units of square-millimeters and L is a club head loft angle in units of degrees.
In alternative examples, the cavity back iron type club head may include an unsupported striking plate area defined as the portion of the striking plate rear cavity region lacking a backing support structure having a modulus of elasticity greater than about 25 GPa. An unsupported area ratio defined as a ratio of the unsupported striking plate area and the surface area of the striking surface may be used to characterize the club head. In some examples, the unsupported area ratio is greater than or equal to 80%.
In yet other alternative examples, the striking plate thickness and the unsupported striking plate area may be associated with a characteristic thickness ratio defined as a ratio of the average striking plate thickness within the striking plate rear cavity region and a square root of the unsupported striking plate area. In some examples, the characteristic thickness ratio is less than about 5%.
Referring to
As shown in
Grinding and/or polishing operations can be used to remove any excess material or irregularities introduced in the welding process, or to provide a selected club head appearance such as, for example, a specularly reflective polished appearance, or other appearance. The striking plate 130 may also include a set of scorelines, such as exemplary scorelines 135, 136 formed in the striking surface 132.
The head body 110 includes a sole cavity 126 formed in proximity to a sole portion of the head body 110 and configured to receive a cartridge assembly 120. The sole cavity 126 is defined in part by a sole-facing surface 127 and a rear cavity surface 128. The sole cavity 126 is configured so that at least a portion of a surface of the cartridge assembly 120 contacts the rear surface 134 of the striking plate 130 when a cartridge assembly 120 is inserted into the sole cavity 126. Typically, the cartridge assembly 120 contacts at least some portions of the sole-facing surface 127 and the rear cavity surface 128, and is secured to the sole-facing surface 127. Referring to
As described above, the striking plate 130 and the head body 110 may be formed separately. However, alternative manufacturing processes can also be used. For example, the head body 110 and the striking plate 130 can be formed as one piece using various forging, casting, and molding processes as are commonly practiced by golf club head manufacturers. Where the head body 110 and the striking plate 130 are formed as one piece, the substantially planar striking surface 132 is defined by the one piece club head.
In one embodiment, the cartridge assembly 120 includes a cartridge body 122 that is configured to receive one or more cartridge inserts 124. Typically the cartridge body 122 is provided with one or more cylindrical bores or other cavities that retain the cartridge inserts 124. Generally the cartridge body 122 has a modulus of elasticity that is lower than that of the cartridge inserts 124.
Some examples of materials that can be used to form the cartridge body 122 include, without limitation, viscoelastic elastomers; vinyl copolymers with or without inorganic fillers; polyvinyl acetate with or without mineral fillers such as barium sulfate; acrylics; polyesters; polyurethanes; polyethers; polyamides; polybutadienes; polystyrenes; polyisoprenes; polyethylenes; polyolefins; styrene/isoprene block copolymers; metallized polyesters; metallized acrylics; epoxies; epoxy and graphite composites; natural and synthetic rubbers; piezoelectric ceramics; thermoset and thermoplastic rubbers; foamed polymers; ionomers; low-density fiber glass; bitumen; silicone; and mixtures thereof. The metallized polyesters and acrylics can comprise aluminum as the metal. Commercially available materials include resilient polymeric materials such as Scotchdamp™ from 3M, Sorbothane® from Sorbothane, Inc., DYAD® and GP® from Soundcoat Company Inc., Dynamat® from Dynamat Control of North America, Inc., NoViFlex™ Sylomer® from Pole Star Maritime Group, LLC, Isoplast® from The Dow Chemical Company, and Legetolex™ from Piqua Technologies, Inc. In one embodiment the cartridge body 122 may be formed from a material having a modulus of elasticity ranging from about 0.001 GPa to about 25 GPa, and a durometer ranging from about 10 to about 30 on a Shore D scale. In a preferred embodiment the cartridge body 122 may be formed from a material having a modulus of elasticity ranging from about 0.001 GPa to about 10 GPa, and a durometer ranging from about 15 to about 25 on a Shore D scale. In a most preferred embodiment the cartridge body 122 may be formed from a material having a modulus of elasticity ranging from about 0.001 GPa to about 5 GPa, and a durometer ranging from about 18 to about 22 on a Shore D scale. In some examples, a material providing vibration damping is preferred.
As shown in
In order to provide selected mass, mass distribution, and/or vibration dampening characteristics, in some examples the cartridge body 122 can be provided with an additional loading material as spheres, rods, fibers or other particles that are distributed throughout the cartridge body 122. In other examples, the cartridge body 122 may comprise two or more sections of different materials that are configured to provide such benefits. In yet other examples, the cartridge assembly 120 may be formed without cartridge inserts 124, and fiber or particulate loading material may be distributed throughout the cartridge body 122 to achieve desirable mass distribution and/or vibration dampening characteristics. The fiber or particulate loading material may be formed from materials such as those listed above with respect to the cartridge inserts 124. Other cartridge body 122 configurations may include a laminar structure comprising alternating layers of materials having varying modulus of elasticity values.
The cartridge assembly 120 can be conveniently secured to the sole cavity 126 in the club head 100 with a tape strip 129, other adhesive, or otherwise secured or retained in the sole cavity 126. Cartridge inserts 124 can be cylindrical or other shapes, or can be omitted based on the dimensions and density of the cartridge body 122. A badge 125 can be applied to the head body 110, to control mass distribution, for ornamentation, club identification, or other purposes. As shown in
Referring to
The surface area of the striking surface 132 (i.e., the surface area of the substantially planar surface defined by the striking plate 130 and the perimeter portion 138) can be selected based on, for example, club type, striking surface shape, and whether or not the club is to be a so-called “oversized” club. The thickness of the striking plate 130 is defined as the distance between a selected point on the striking face 132 and the rear surface 134 along an axis perpendicular to the striking face 132. The striking plate thickness can be selected to reduce mass associated with the striking plate 130, so that additional mass can be distributed to other parts of the club head 100 to achieve intended club design goals. Typically, striking plate thickness is selected consistent with long term club use to avoid premature striking plate failure due to fatigue cracking and other such failure modes. Typically, redistributed mass is situated low on the club head 100 and rearward of the striking plate 130.
Some examples of materials that can be used to form the striking plate and the head body include, without limitation, carbon steels (e.g., 1020 or 8620 carbon steel), stainless steels (e.g., 304, 410, or 431 stainless steel), PH (precipitation-hardenable) alloys (e.g., 17-4, C450, or C455 alloys), titanium alloys (e.g., 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), aluminum/aluminum alloys (e.g., 3000 series alloys, 5000 series alloys, 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6, and 7000 series alloys, such as 7075), magnesium alloys, copper alloys, nickel alloys, glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP), carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP), metal matrix composites (MMC), ceramic matrix composites (CMC), and natural composites (e.g., wood composites). High strength materials having a relatively high modulus of elasticity (typically greater than about 50 GPa, 100 GPa, 150 GPa, 200 GPa, or 250 GPa) are generally preferred. In use, the striking plate 130 is subject to numerous high speed impacts with a golf ball, and should resist cracking and permanent deformation. Different types of irons (e.g., long irons and short irons) can experience different forces in golf ball impacts, and striking plate thickness can be adjusted accordingly, if desired.
Striking plate dimensions can vary based on striking plate composition and preferred club head dimensions. Larger or smaller striking surfaces can be provided for “short” or “long” irons, if desired. Typically, cavity-back club head designs such as the example of
In some embodiments, a cartridge or cartridge assembly may be configured to contact a portion of the rear surface 134 of the striking plate 130 in a secondary support area, or cartridge contact area. In this way, the cartridge allows for a thinner striking plate because of the additional support the cartridge provides to the striking plate. As used herein, portions of a striking plate or other striking member of a golf club that lack a backing support structure (e.g., a cartridge or cartridge assembly) having a modulus of elasticity greater than about 25 GPa are referred to as unsupported. Consequently, an unsupported striking plate area may be defined as the portion of the striking plate rear cavity region lacking a backing support structure having a modulus of elasticity greater than about 25 GPa, or equivalently the surface area of the striking plate rear cavity region minus the cartridge contact area. Striking plate dimensions, surface area of the striking plate rear cavity region, unsupported striking plate surface area, striking plate thickness, and cartridge contact area can be selected based on a desired mass distribution, club durability, striking plate materials, and other design goals.
As used herein, a contact area of an elastomeric portion of a cartridge with a rear surface of a striking plate is referred to as a secondary support area, or cartridge contact area. As noted above, the cartridge body may be formed from an elastomeric material having a modulus of elasticity ranging from about 0.001 to about 25 GPa. Providing such a secondary support area with elastomeric materials permits mass reduction in the striking plate with no decrease in striking plate durability. In order to maintain a large striking surface, such mass reduction can be conveniently associated with a relatively thin striking plate. In a typical example, a stainless steel striking plate (modulus of about 200 GPa) having an unsupported striking plate area of about 2000 mm2 has an average thickness of about 1.9 mm and a cartridge contact area of about 400 mm2. Details for several representative examples are set forth in the table below.
While
An additional cartridge example is illustrated in
Striking plates of pull face construction irons or striking plate portions of one piece cast or forged irons can be conveniently described based on a characteristic thickness ratio that is defined as a ratio of the average striking plate thickness within the striking plate rear cavity region and a square root of the unsupported striking plate area (i.e., the portion of the striking plate rear cavity region lacking a backing support structure having a modulus of elasticity greater than about 25 GPa). In addition, a portion of an unsupported striking plate area in contact with the cartridge can be described by a relative cartridge contact area ratio defined as a ratio of the cartridge contact area and unsupported striking plate area.
In typical examples, unsupported striking plate areas range from about 1500 mm2 to about 3000 mm2, average striking plate thickness within the striking plate rear cavity region range from about 1.5 mm to about 2.2 mm, and cartridge contact areas range from about 300 mm2 to about 400 mm2. Consequently, characteristic thickness ratios may range from about 2% to about 4.8% and relative cartridge contact area ratios may range from about 10% to about 25%, or preferably from about 10% to about 18%. Such club head parameters can vary depending on club head geometry as affected by material properties such as, for example, a modulus of elasticity of striking plate material. Parameters can also be selected based on whether a particular club head is to be a short iron, a mid iron, or a long iron.
Club head geometries for three representative club set configurations A, B, and C are described in Table 1 below. For each of the three sets, representative values for a 3 iron, a 6 iron, and a 9 iron are listed. Tabulated values are unsupported striking plate area (USPA), average striking plate thickness (ASPT), cartridge contact area (CCA), characteristic thickness ratio (CTR), and relative cartridge contact area ratio (RCAR). The representative club set heads may be manufactured from discrete components using, for example, pull face construction methods, or the representative club set heads may be manufactured as unitary components using, for example, various casting or forging techniques.
The tabulated values are representative, and other configurations can be provided as described above. Cartridges can be configured to provide secondary support areas of various shapes and sizes, and situated at club locations based on, for example, an intended mass distribution. Unsupported striking plate surfaces may be of constant thickness, continuously variable thickness, stepped thickness, or combinations thereof. In some examples, only portions of an elastomeric surface of a cartridge contacts the rear surface of a striking plate or other striking portion.
Striking plates of pull face construction cavity back irons or striking plate portions of one piece cast or forged cavity back irons may also be described based on an unsupported area ratio that is defined as a ratio of the unsupported striking plate area and the area of the substantially planar striking surface 132. Club head geometries for two representative club set configurations D and E are described in Table 2 below. For club set configuration D, representative values for 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 irons are listed. For club set configuration E, representative values for 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 irons are listed. Tabulated values are loft angle (L), striking surface area (SSA), unsupported striking plate area (USPA), and unsupported area ratio (UAR). As above, the representative iron heads may be manufactured from discrete components using, for example, pull face construction methods, or the representative club set heads may be manufactured as unitary components using, for example, various casting or forging techniques.
For each of the exemplary club heads listed in Table 2, the striking surface area SSA is related to the loft angle L by the following equation:
SSA≥14.4(L)+2875,
wherein SSA is the striking surface area measured in square-millimeters and L is the loft angle measured in degrees. In other examples, areas and angles can be expressed in different units with corresponding changes in any numerical constants in the equation. This relationship provides for increased striking face surface area for a given loft angle compared to traditional cavity back iron club heads. Additionally, the unsupported area ratio for each of the club heads listed in Table 2 is greater than or equal to 80%. In alternative embodiments of the invention, the unsupported area ratio may range from about 80% to about 88%, and in preferred embodiments of the invention, the unsupported area ratio may range from about 83% to about 88%.
The loft angle of an exemplary cavity back 4-iron may range from about 19 degrees to about 21 degrees, preferably from about 19.5 degrees to about 20.5 degrees; the striking surface area may range from about 3156 mm2 to about 3487 mm2, preferably from about 3322 mm2 to about 3487 mm2; and the unsupported striking plate ratio is greater than or equal to 80%, preferably about 83% to about 88%; The loft angle of an exemplary cavity back 5-iron may range from about 21.5 degrees to about 22.5 degrees, preferably from about 22 degrees to about 23 degrees; the striking surface area may range from about 3185 mm2 to about 3519 mm2, preferably from about 3352 mm2 to about 3519 mm2; and the unsupported striking plate ratio is greater than or equal to 80%, preferably about 83% to about 88%. The loft angle of an exemplary cavity back 6-iron may range from about 24.5 degrees to about 26.5 degrees, preferably from about 25 degrees to about 26 degrees; the striking surface area may range from about 3228 mm2 to about 3582 mm2, preferably from about 3405 mm2 to about 3582 mm2; and the unsupported striking plate ratio is greater than or equal to 80%, preferably about 83% to about 88%. The loft angle of an exemplary cavity back 7-iron may range from about 27.5 degrees to about 30.5 degrees, preferably from about 28 degrees to about 30 degrees; the striking surface area may range from about 3271 mm2 to about 3646 mm2, preferably from about 3458 mm2 to about 3646 mm2; and the unsupported striking plate ratio is greater than or equal to 80%, preferably about 83% to about 88%. The loft angle of an exemplary cavity back 8-iron may range from about 31.5 degrees to about 34.5 degrees, preferably from about 32 degrees to about 34 degrees; the striking surface area may range from about 3329 mm2 to about 3709 mm2, preferably from about 3519 mm2 to about 3709 mm2; and the unsupported striking plate ratio is greater than or equal to 80%, preferably about 83% to about 88%. The loft angle of an exemplary cavity back 9-iron may range from about 36.5 degrees to about 39.5 degrees, preferably from about 36 degrees to about 39 degrees; the striking surface area may range from about 3401 mm2 to about 3788 mm2, preferably from about 3594 mm2 to about 3788 mm2; and the unsupported striking plate ratio is greater than or equal to 80%, preferably about 83% to about 88%.
Striking plates can be thinned substantially uniformly or selected locations on a striking plate can be thinned or otherwise shaped so as to provide a redistribution of mass, a desired “feel” when used, and/or a preferred “sweet spot” size or location. Referring to
As shown in
Horizontal (H) and vertical (V) locations of the center of a striking zone for a representative iron set are included in Table 3. For convenience, approximate striking plate mass is provided for each club.
An additional exemplary striking plate 802 retained in a head body 804 is illustrated in
7-8.5
The striking plate examples shown in
The representative clubs, components thereof, and related assembly and manufacturing methods presented above are examples only and are not to be taken as limiting. As disclosed above, striking plates used in pull face club construction or other club faces can be thinned or thickened to permit improved mass redistribution. In some examples, portion of a thinned striking plate are supported or contacted by a weight cartridge, while other examples, a central or interior portion of a striking plate is thinner or thicker than a surrounding portion. Thickness changes can be abrupt or gradual, and tapered thinned or thickened face plates can be used. Portions of the striking plate can be grooved or otherwise relieved so that the associated mass can be situated as desired to provide an intended playing characteristic. These examples are presented for convenient explanation, and are not to be taken as limiting the scope of the appended claims. We claim all that is encompassed by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/831,038, filed Dec. 4, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/538,614, filed Nov. 11, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/971,786, filed Aug. 20, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/877,580, filed Oct. 23, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,535,177, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4252262 | Igarashi | Feb 1981 | A |
5282625 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5301946 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5330187 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5333872 | Manning et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344140 | Anderson | Sep 1994 | A |
5344150 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5505453 | Mack | Apr 1996 | A |
5564994 | Chang | Oct 1996 | A |
5697855 | Aizawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5707302 | Leon et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5766092 | Mimeur et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776011 | Su et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5830084 | Kosmatka | Nov 1998 | A |
5921869 | Blough et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6165081 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6290607 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6309309 | Beach et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319150 | Werner | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6379262 | Boone | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428426 | Helmsetter | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6508722 | McCabe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6592468 | Vincent et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616546 | Cho | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652391 | Kubica | Nov 2003 | B1 |
D490129 | Greene | May 2004 | S |
6746343 | Yoneyama | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6800038 | Willett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811496 | Wahl et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6899638 | Iwata | May 2005 | B2 |
6904663 | Willett | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6997820 | Willett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018303 | Yamamoto | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7077763 | Wahl et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7144337 | Hirano | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7150686 | Mitsuba | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153222 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166207 | Chao et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175540 | Sano | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186188 | Gilbert | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192362 | Gilbert | Mar 2007 | B2 |
D539862 | Nunez | Apr 2007 | S |
7235023 | Sugimoto | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7281991 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7591735 | Matsunaga | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7744486 | Hou et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744487 | Tavares et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7922604 | Roach | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8088025 | Wahl et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8393976 | Soracco | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8449406 | Frame et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8920259 | Takechi | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8961336 | Parsons et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8974317 | Griffin | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9878220 | Parsons et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10155143 | Wahl | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20010055996 | Iwata | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020068646 | Yoneyama | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030013542 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036442 | Chao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030064824 | Takeda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078112 | Sugimoto | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092502 | Pergande et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030119602 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030228928 | Yabu | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236134 | Nishitani | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040043830 | Imamoto | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083596 | Willett et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099538 | Chao et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040242339 | Gilbert | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050026716 | Wahl | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037864 | Gilbert | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050101406 | Hirano | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143188 | Tseng | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050192116 | Imamoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202900 | Gilbert | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215349 | Huang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050277484 | Reed | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060052179 | Hou | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063606 | Schweigert | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060128497 | Hou et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060172822 | Liang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199661 | Deng et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234805 | Gilbert | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234806 | Gilbert | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060234808 | Gilbert | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070129162 | Pan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129165 | Matsunaga | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129166 | Shimazaki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129168 | Matsunaga | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155534 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070225086 | Lin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070287556 | Nakamura | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015048 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032815 | Yamamoto | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058119 | Soracco | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080125246 | Matsunaga | May 2008 | A1 |
20090062032 | Boyd | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090118037 | Roach | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137339 | Nakano | May 2009 | A1 |
20100261540 | Roach | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100273570 | Ines | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100304887 | Bennett et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130281227 | Roach | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20180085643 | Wahl | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29715997 | Sep 1997 | DE |
2249031 | Apr 1992 | GB |
H10-127832 | May 1998 | JP |
H10-277187 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2001-346924 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004-209091 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-313777 | Nov 2004 | JP |
WO 9215374 | Sep 1992 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ASM, AISI Type 304 Stainless Steel, uploaded Oct. 18, 2019, ASM webpage, 2 pages. |
BASF, Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers, uploaded Oct. 18, 2019, BASF, 8 pages. |
BASF, Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers, uploaded Oct. 29, 2020, BASF, 8 pages. |
Best Stainless & Alloys, 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Bar, uploaded Aug. 14, 2018, Best Stainless & Alloys, 7 pages. |
AZO Materials, AISI 1070 Carbon Steel, uploaded Aug. 14, 2018, AZO Materials, 3 pages. |
BASF, Thermoplastic Polyurethan Elastomers, uploaded Jan. 31, 2018, BASF, 8 pages. |
TaylorMade Golf Introduces New rac LT Irons, http://www.tmag.com/media/pressreleases/080604_racLT.htm, (accessed Oct. 28, 2004). |
Non-final Office action dated Feb. 11, 2013 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/877,580, 18 pp. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Jan. 17, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00516 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,932,150, for Golf Club Head, owned by Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Jan. 26, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00540 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,353,785, for Golf Club Head, owned by Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Feb. 21, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00675 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,199,143, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Feb. 26, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00702 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,961,336, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Mar. 12, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00768 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,345,938, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacturing Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Mar. 12, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00769 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,346,203, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Mar. 23, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00826 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,533,201, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Apr. 11, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00891 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,468,821, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Apr. 13, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00915 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,610,481, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf Llc. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Apr. 18, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00925 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,364,727, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Apr. 27, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-00983 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,675,853, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Aug. 22, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-01542 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,814,952, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review, filed Sep. 12, 2018, Case No. IPR2018-01681 for U.S. Pat. No. 9,610,481, for Golf Club Heads and Methods to Manufacture Golf Club Heads, owned by Parsons Xtreme Golf LLC. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190070467 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15831038 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16179404 | US | |
Parent | 14538614 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15831038 | US | |
Parent | 13971786 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14538614 | US | |
Parent | 11877580 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13971786 | US |