With the advent of thin walled metalwood golf club heads, the performance of metalwood clubs has improved considerably. By increasing the surface area of the striking face, using high strength alloys for its construction, and reducing its thickness to introduce a “trampoline” effect, club head designers have increased the efficiency of energy transfer from a metalwood club to a golf ball. As a result, the United States Golf Association (USGA) has imposed regulations to limit energy transferred from drivers to a golf ball by defining a maximum “characteristic time” (CT) that the clubface may remain in contact with a suspended steel weight impacting it. The maximum CT corresponds to a maximum “coefficient of restitution” (COR) for metalwood clubs. Currently, the maximum COR permissible by the USGA is 0.830.
For golf club striking faces of a fixed size and substantially constant thickness, there exists a thickness below which the CT value will be outside the range allowable by the USGA, but that may still be structurally feasible for use on a club head. Limiting the amount of material used to construct a club's face is desirable for cost savings and improved mass properties.
Various metalwood designs have been proposed utilizing variable face thickness profiles that both meet the USGA's CT limitation and minimize face mass. However, such faces are typically expensive to produce. Other designs have incorporated thin faces with protracted rib or support structures appended to or formed integrally with the striking face, and these too have proven costly to manufacture, and increase complexity of the club head design.
A need exists for improved USGA conforming metalwood golf club heads which minimize the amount of material used to construct the club face, as well as for hollow golf club heads which maximize average energy transfer efficiency of the striking face.
Various implementations of the broad principles described herein provide a golf club head which may be manufactured with a face that utilizes less material than a conventional design, and that may conform to USGA rules and regulations for metal woods. Further, features are proposed which may improve performance characteristics of hollow club heads, and increase the average energy transfer efficiency such heads' striking faces.
Various implementations will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following drawings in which:
For the purposes of illustration these figures are not necessarily drawn to scale. In all of the figures, like components are designated by like reference numerals.
Throughout the following description, specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the broad inventive principles discussed herein. However, these broad principles may be practiced without these particulars and thus these details need not be limiting. In other instances, well known elements have not been shown or described to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention. Accordingly, the detailed description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
With reference to
As in
As shown in
In the following examples, the junction may comprise any adjacent portions of the face 202, sole 204, skirt 206, and crown 208. Generally, the junction is defined as a portion of the head which interconnects the face 202 to at least a portion of the remainder of the head 200. Since there are a variety of possible configurations for the junction 212, including those presented above and others, it may be beneficial to define the junction as shown in
H and L may thus dimensionally represent the junction 212 on the head 200 at a generally vertical planar location substantially perpendicular to the striking face 202, and delimited by the points 304, 306 and 308. To define the junction 212 in other areas of the head, a set of first and second imaginary junction bounding lines 312 (on the face 202) and 314 (on the sole 204, the skirt 206 and the crown 208) may be traced on the head 200 to form a closed loop, passing through the junction points 310 and maintaining a substantially constant distance (d′, d″) from a reference feature, for example, each imaginary junction bounding line 312 may be parallel to the face perimeter edge 205, as shown in
As an example, for a metalwood driver having a volume of, e.g., 300-600 cm3, both H and L may have values of up to about 20 mm. More preferably, both H and L may have values up to about 14 mm. More preferably still, H may have a value of up to about 12 mm, and L may have a value of up to about 10 mm.
The junction 212 may be locally stiffened to improve the performance of the head 200. In particular, certain performance advantages may be gained by introducing local stiffening at selected locations.
For example, at least one stiffening member 400 (see
As shown in
Generally, the stiffening member 400 may comprise a mass provided within the junction 212. The mass may be formed integrally with at least a portion of the junction 212, and may have a variety of configurations. For example, as shown in
Alternatively, the stiffening member 400 may be a geometrically shaped mass, examples of which are shown in
In addition, the stiffening member 400 may comprise at least one pleat or corrugation 450 in the wall portion forming the junction 212, as shown in
The preceding description recites several exemplary embodiments for the stiffening member 400. It should be appreciated in particular that a variety of other embodiments may be adapted for use as the mass portion of the stiffening member 400.
In all applicable configurations, the maximum thickness T of the mass member should generally be selected to impart sufficient stiffness to the junction 212 to provide the desired effects. For example, the maximum value of T may generally be greater than the average wall thickness of the junction 212. For example, the junction may have wall thicknesses ranging from about 0.4 mm to about 4 mm, and the maximum value of T may be between about 1 mm and about 8 mm. More preferably, the maximum value of T may be between about 3 mm and about 7 mm. Most preferably, the maximum value of T may be between about 4 mm and about 6 mm.
Further, as illustrated in
In addition, the stiffening member 400 may comprise at least one rib 500 provided on the junction 212, as shown in
Generally, if rib(s) 500 are incorporated, they may have a maximum true height, HMAX, from about 2 mm to about 12 mm, as shown in
Generally, the introduction of the stiffening member 400 at the junction 212 may allow a reduction in thickness of the striking face 202 while maintaining a maximum COR of 0.830 or less per USGA rules as well as the structural integrity of the head 200. The stiffening member 400 may further allow for a COR of substantially 0.830 to be achieved over a greater percentage of surface area of the face 202. Alternatively, the stiffening member 400 may allow for a maximum COR that is higher than the USGA mandated maximum over a greater percentage of surface area of the face 202. More generally, the stiffening member 400 may increase COR values on the face 202, resulting in a higher average COR value for the face 202.
For identical club heads of a given face thickness, or thickness profile, it was found that the stiffening member 400 increases ball speed values across face 202. Two heads similar to that shown in
Further, the introduction of the stiffening member 400 may also enable the point of maximum COR to be repositioned to an area that may be more desirable without altering external head geometry and shape. For example, it may be believed that, on average, golfers strike the ball towards the toe of the club more frequently than at the geometric center of the face. In such an example, strategically placing the stiffening member 400 on the junction 212 to reposition the point of maximum COR towards the toe side of the face 202 may yield a club head that drives the ball longer, on average.
It should be noted that, although examples are given only showing the stiffening member 400 located internally within the head 200, the stiffening member may be equally effective when positioned on the exterior of the head on the junction 212. This may be particularly true when the junction 212 has an inwardly curved or concave configuration as shown in
The above-described implementations of the broad principles described herein are given only as examples. Therefore, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the exemplary illustrations given, but by the furthest extent of the broad principles on which the above examples are based. Aspects of the broad principles are reflected in appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 14/320,273, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2014, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13,896,991, which was filed on May 17, 2013, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/585,287, which was filed on Aug. 14, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,465,380, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/295,927, which was filed on Nov. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,262,503, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/047,569, which was filed on Mar. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,088,024, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/789,117, which was filed on May 27, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,927,232, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/476,945, which was filed on Jun. 2, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,815,522, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/441,244, which was filed on May 26, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,585,233.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1582836 | Link | Apr 1926 | A |
4429879 | Schmidt | Feb 1984 | A |
4465221 | Schmidt | Aug 1984 | A |
4502687 | Kochevar | Mar 1985 | A |
4511145 | Schmidt | Apr 1985 | A |
4602787 | Sugioka et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4932658 | Antonious | Jun 1990 | A |
5000454 | Soda | Mar 1991 | A |
5024437 | Anderson | Jun 1991 | A |
D319857 | Antonious | Sep 1991 | S |
5094383 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5207428 | Aizawa | May 1993 | A |
5261664 | Anderson | Nov 1993 | A |
5292129 | Long et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5295689 | Lundberg | Mar 1994 | A |
5297794 | Lu | Mar 1994 | A |
5328184 | Antonious | Jul 1994 | A |
5362055 | Rennie | Nov 1994 | A |
5390924 | Antonious | Feb 1995 | A |
5395113 | Antonious | Mar 1995 | A |
5419559 | Melanson | May 1995 | A |
5451058 | Price et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5482279 | Antonious | Jan 1996 | A |
5533729 | Leu | Jul 1996 | A |
5547427 | Rigal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564994 | Chang | Oct 1996 | A |
5584770 | Jensen | Dec 1996 | A |
5669829 | Lin | Sep 1997 | A |
5704850 | Shieh | Jan 1998 | A |
5709615 | Liang | Jan 1998 | A |
5711722 | Miyajima et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5755627 | Yamazaki et al. | May 1998 | A |
5836830 | Onuki | Nov 1998 | A |
5908356 | Nagamoto | Jun 1999 | A |
5941782 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
5997415 | Wood | Dec 1999 | A |
6059669 | Pearce | May 2000 | A |
6162133 | Peterson | Dec 2000 | A |
6183377 | Liang | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193614 | Sasamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6299547 | Kosmatka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299549 | Shieh | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325728 | Helmstetter et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6422951 | Burrows | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454665 | Antonious | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6524197 | Boone | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6551199 | Viera | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6595871 | Sano | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6638182 | Kosmatka | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6685576 | Kosmatka | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6832961 | Sano | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6839975 | Fujishima | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840872 | Yoneyama | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851159 | Nikolic et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6852038 | Yabu | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6979270 | Allen | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7029403 | Rice | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7140974 | Chao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7247104 | Poynor | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258629 | Chen | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273423 | Imamoto | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7585233 | Horacek et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7651412 | Meyer | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7815522 | Horacek et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7927232 | Horacek et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8088024 | Horacek et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8262503 | Horacek et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8795100 | Horacek et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20020019265 | Allen | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020055396 | Nishimoto et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020169035 | Liu | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169036 | Boone | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030013542 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027662 | Werner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030190975 | Fagot | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040038750 | Lo | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040157678 | Kohno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176180 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219991 | Suprock et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050137029 | Evans et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148405 | Imamoto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164804 | Poynor | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197207 | Chen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272523 | Atkins | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060079345 | Gibbs et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060111200 | Poynor | May 2006 | A1 |
20060172818 | Yamamoto | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060293119 | Hou | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080139338 | Matsunaga et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-317018 | Nov 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160303439 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14320273 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 15192075 | US | |
Parent | 13896991 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14320273 | US | |
Parent | 13585287 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 13896991 | US | |
Parent | 13295927 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 13585287 | US | |
Parent | 13047569 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13295927 | US | |
Parent | 12789117 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13047569 | US | |
Parent | 12476945 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 12789117 | US | |
Parent | 11441244 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 12476945 | US |