The disclosure below may be subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the documents containing this disclosure, as they appear in the Patent and Trademark Office records, but otherwise reserves all applicable copyrights.
Iron-type golf club heads may generally be classified into “blade” and “perimeter-weighted” categories. Perimeter-weighted iron-type club heads may have a substantial concentration of mass distributed behind the striking face in the form of at least one peripheral wall, sometimes called the perimeter-weighting element. A perimeter-weighted iron-type golf club head may also be referred to as a “cavity-back” iron head, or simply a “cavity-back”, because the perimeter-weighting element generally delimits a cavity in the rear portion of the club head opposite the striking face.
An important performance aspect of cavity-back irons is the tactile feedback communicated to the player at ball impact. To reduce undesirable dynamic excitation synonymous with mishit shots, the perimeter-weighting element of a cavity-back club head may be provided with a complimentary vibration-damping member. A secure coupling of the vibration-damping member to the club head may require that features for retention of the vibration-damping member be integrally incorporated into the head. The added weight of these retention features may adversely affect the mass properties of the club head, negatively impacting performance. Moreover, potentially complex geometries of the retention features may increase manufacturing complexity and cost.
The present invention, in one or more aspects thereof, may advantageously comprise a golf club head having enhanced tactile feedback, augmented performance, and improved structural integrity.
In one example, a golf club head, according to one or more aspects of the present invention, may include a strike face, a rear wall behind the strike face, and a perimeter-weighting element at least partially surrounding the rear wall. The club head may further include a preload spacer, associated with the rear wall, and a resilient component, having a recess. The resilient component may be associated with the perimeter-weighting element. A portion of the preload spacer may be disposed in the recess of the resilient component, whereby the preload spacer biases the resilient component against a portion of the perimeter-weighting element.
In another example, a golf club head, according to one or more aspects of the present invention, may include a strike face, a rear wall behind the strike face, and a perimeter-weighting element at least partially surrounding the rear wall. The club head may further include a preload spacer associated with the rear wall and a resilient component, associated with the perimeter-weighting element. The resilient component may include a projection for engaging a portion of the preload spacer.
These and other features and advantages of the golf club head according to the invention in its various aspects, as provided by one or more of the examples described in detail below, will become apparent after consideration of the ensuing description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims. The accompanying drawings are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
a is a front perspective view of an exemplary golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present invention.
b is a front perspective view of the golf club head of
c is an exploded view of the golf club head of
d is a rear perspective view of the golf club head of
e is a cross-sectional view taken along the lines Ic-Ic of
f is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a detail If of
g is an enlarged cross-sectional view of an exemplary golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present invention.
a is an exploded view of an exemplary golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present invention.
b is a rear perspective view of the golf club head of
c is a cross-sectional view taken along the lines IIc-IIc of
d is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a detail IId of
a is an exploded view of an exemplary golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present invention.
b is a rear perspective view of the golf club head of
c is a cross-sectional view taken along the lines IIIc-IIIc of
d is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a detail IIId of
a is an exploded view of an exemplary golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present invention.
b is a rear perspective view of the golf club head of
c is a cross-sectional view taken along the lines IVc-IVc of
d is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a detail IVd of
a is an exploded view of an exemplary golf club head according to one or more aspects of the present invention.
b is a rear perspective view of the golf club head of
c is a cross-sectional view taken along the lines Vc-Vc of
d is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a detail Vd of
Referring to
As shown in
Examples of the materials suitable for fabricating the resilient component 152 may include polyurethane, silicone, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), Nylon, polycarbonate (PC), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), thermoplastic rubber (TPR), thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV), thermoplastic elastomers (TPE), and natural rubber. In another example, the resilient component 152 may be made from thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), having a Shore hardness between about 65 A and about 75 A. The specific gravity of the resilient component may depend on the material selected and may generally be between about 0.8 and about 2.0. Alternatively, the resilient component 152 may be densified by blending an elastic material with a higher-density substance, e.g., powdered tungsten. The specific gravity of the densified insert may be in a range from about 0.8 to about 15. Accordingly, the resilient component may be used to alter the weight distribution of the club head.
Referring again to
c-1g illustrate a preload spacer 150, contiguous with the rear wall 132 of the club head. As shown in
Preferably, the preload spacer 150 is at least partially formed from a rigid metallic and/or non-metallic material, e.g., aluminum, titanium, ABS, fiber reinforced plastic, or poly-vinyl chloride (PVC). In one example, the preload spacer 150 may be a constrained-layer damper includes at least one constraining member, e.g., a rigid aluminum-alloy plate, and a visco-elastic layer, e.g., 3M™ VHB™ Adhesive Transfer Tape 9469.
In another example, illustrated in
Referring to
In another example, shown in
Referring to
With reference to
Referring to
With reference to
Referring to
As illustrated in
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary aspects thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/344,003, filed on Dec. 24, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2846228 | Reach | Oct 1955 | A |
4792139 | Nagasaki et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4798383 | Nagasaki et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4848747 | Fujimura et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883274 | Hsien | Nov 1989 | A |
4884812 | Nagasaki et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4928972 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1990 | A |
4964640 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5290036 | Fenton et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297794 | Lu | Mar 1994 | A |
5409229 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5605511 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5800282 | Hutin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6491593 | Takeda | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6592469 | Gilbert | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6688989 | Best | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6743117 | Gilbert | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6835144 | Best | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875124 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902495 | Pergande et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6921344 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929563 | Nishitani | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7186188 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192361 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192362 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201669 | Stites et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7232377 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7273418 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7371190 | Gilbert et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7597633 | Shimazaki et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8057322 | Wallans | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20050148407 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060030425 | Sukman | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060166758 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060234805 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258480 | Hou et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070191134 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080026866 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058119 | Soracco et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058120 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Nov. 17, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/550,108. |
Sep. 3, 2010 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/344,003. |
Feb. 15, 2011 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/344,003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110237347 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12344003 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 13158197 | US |