Patent Grant
7993214
The present invention relates to a golf club head having a hollow behind the face portion, more particularly to a structure of the face portion provided with a specific thickness distribution.
Recently, there have been widely used wood-type hollow golf club heads whose face portion is made of a thin metal material in order to increase carry and reduce the weight of the face portion, while providing a thicker central region to provide necessary strength and durability.
In this structure, since the central region is surrounded by the relatively thin region, there is a tendency that a large stress at impact tends to concentrate on the upper edge and lower edge of the face portion (namely, annular thin region) because, in comparison with the toe-side edge and heel-side edge, the upper and lower edges are approximate to the central region which is moved largely at impact.
United States Patent Application Publication No. US-2003-144079-A1 discloses a wood-type golf club head, wherein, in order to increase the strength of the face portion, the thin region surrounding a thick central region is provided with narrow ribs extending radially from the central thick region.
Japanese Patent Application Publication No. P2006-175135A discloses a golf club head whose face portion is provided with a thicker part in order to minimize the difference in carry distance between sweet spot shots and off-center shots towards the heel and toe, wherein the thicker part is disclosed as having a thickness of 4 mm to 10 mm and extending almost parallel to the vertical direction with a substantially constant width, and the resultant thin part of the face portion is disclosed as having a thickness of less than 2.5 mm.
On the other hand, according to a research made by the present inventor et al., as shown in
Therefore, in view of such distribution, there is plenty of scope for minimizing the above-mentioned difference in the carry distance and improving the strength and durability of the face portion, while the reduced overall thickness of the face portion is maintained, and a large variation of the thickness is restrained for easier manufacturing.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a golf club head, in which the difference in carry distance between sweet spot shots and off-center shots can be minimized, and the durability of the face portion can be improved.
According to the present invention, a golf club head is provided with a hollow structure comprising a face portion of which front surface forms a clubface, a crown portion, a sole portion and a side portion between the crown portion and sole portion,
the face portion comprising:
a central thick part;
a crown-side thick part extending from the central thick part toward the crown portion;
a sole-side thick part extending from said central thick part towards the sole portion;
a toe-side thinner part formed on the toe-side of the crown-side thick part, central thick part and sole-side thick part; and
a heel-side thinner part formed on the heel-side of the crown-side thick part, central thick part and sole-side thick part, wherein
a thickness Tc of the central thick part, thicknesses Tr of the crown-side thick part and sole-side thick part, a thickness TT of the toe-side thinner part, and a thickness TH of the heel-side thinner part satisfy the following conditional expressions: (1) Tc>=Tr>TT, and (2) Tr>TH, and
a centroid of the central thick part is positioned on the toe-side of an extension of a widthwise center line of the crown-side thick part towards the sole portion, and on the heel-side of an extension of a widthwise center line of the sole-side thick part towards the crown portion.
Therefore, the crown-side and sole-side thick parts can mitigate the stress concentration on the upper and lower edges of the face portion, and effectively improve the durability.
Since the crown-side thick part and the sole-side thick part are staggered about the central thick part, the reinforcing effect to the central thick part becomes moderate when compared with those arranged in line as shown in
Further, the deflection of the toe-side thinner part upon off-center shot towards the toe, and the deflection of the heel-side thinner part upon off-center shot towards the heel becomes even, and approximates to the deflection of the central thick part upon sweet-spot shot. Therefore, the variation of the coefficient of restitution due to the variation of the ball hitting position is decreased.
Furthermore, due to the staggered arrangement, the reinforcing effect spreads widely in the toe-heel direction, therefore, even if the ball hitting position becomes off-centered towards the crown or sole, an appropriate deflection of the face portion can be obtained, and the loss of the carry distance is lessened.
In this specification, sizes, positions, directions and the like relating to the club head refer to those under a standard state of the club head unless otherwise noted.
Here, the standard state of the club head is such that the club head is set on a horizontal plane HP so that the center line CL of the club shaft (not shown) is inclined at the lie angle (alpha) while keeping the club shaft center line CL on a vertical plane VP, and the clubface forms its loft angle with respect to the horizontal plane HP. Incidentally, in the case of the club head alone, the center line of the shaft inserting hole can be used instead of the center line of the club shaft.
Sweet spot Ss is the point of intersection between the clubface and a straight line NL drawn normally to the clubface passing the center of gravity G of the head.
Front-back direction is a direction parallel with the above-mentioned straight line NL projected on the horizontal plane HP.
Toe-heel direction is a direction TH parallel with the horizontal plane HP and parallel with the vertical plane VP.
Crown-sole direction is a direction Cs perpendicular to the horizontal plane HP, namely, the vertical direction.
Areas of the front surface and back surface of the face portion and various parts refer to the areas projected on the vertical plane VP unless otherwise noted.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in conjunction with accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, golf club head 1 according to the present invention is a hollow head for a wood-type golf club such as driver (#1) or fairway wood.
The head 1 comprises: a face portion 3 whose front surface defines a clubface 2 for hitting a ball; a crown portion 4 intersecting the clubface 2 at the upper edge 2a thereof; a sole portion 5 intersecting the clubface 2 at the lower edge 2b thereof; a side portion 6 between the crown portion 4 and sole portion 5 which extends from a toe-side edge 2c to a heel-side edge 2d of the clubface 2 through the back face BF of the club head; and a hosel portion 7 provided with a shaft inserting hole 7a and positioned at the heel-side end of the crown to be attached to an end of a club shaft (not shown) inserted into the shaft inserting hole 7a. Thus, the club head 1 has a shell structure with the thin wall and a hollow (i) behind the face portion 3. In this embodiment, the hollow (i) is void, but a filler, e.g. foamed plastic and the like can be disposed therein so as not to contact with the face portion 3.
Preferably, the volume of the head 1 is set in a range of not less than 380 cc, more preferably not less than 400 cc, still more preferably not less than 420 cc in order to increase the moment of inertia and the depth of the center of gravity to improve the directionality of the hit ball. However, to prevent an excessive increase in the club head weight and deteriorations of swing balance and durability and further in view of golf rules or regulations, the head volume is preferably set in a range of not more than 470 cc, more preferably not more than 460 cc.
The mass of the club head 1 is preferably set in a range of not less than 180 grams, more preferably not less than 185 grams in view of the strength and swing balance, but not more than 220 grams, more preferably not more than 215 grams in view of the directionality and traveling distance of the ball.
The club head 1 can be a two- or three- or four-piece structure.
In this embodiment, a two-piece structure is adopted, which comprises: a main body 1B made of at least one kind of metal material; and a face plate 1A made of a metal material and attached to the front of the main body 1B by welding so as to cover the front opening O of the main shell 1B.
For example, as shown in
Since the turnbacks 9a, 9b, 9c and 9d form the front zones of the respective portions 3, 4 and 5, the main body 1B forms the remainder of the club head. Namely, the main body 1B is integrally made up of: a major posterior part 4b of the crown portion 4; a major posterior part 5b of the sole portion 5; a major posterior part 6b of the side portion 6; and the hosel portion 7.
In any case, the face plate 1A and main body 1B are preferably made of metal materials having large specific tensile strength. Specifically, stainless steels, maraging steels, pure titanium, titanium alloys, magnesium alloys, aluminum alloys can be preferably used. As to the titanium alloys, Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn, Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al or the like can be preferably used.
The face plate 1A and the main shell 1B can be made of the same metal materials, but it is also possible that these are made out of different metal materials.
Incidentally, in order to reduce the weight of the club head 1, a fiber reinforced resin may be used to form a part of the main shell 1B. The face plate 1A can be made through a plastic deformation process, for example, hot forging of a round bar of the metal material, or mold pressing of a rolled sheet of the metal material or the like. As to the welding, plasma welding, Tig welding and laser welding are preferably used.
The face portion 3 has, as usual, a contour shape longer in the toe-heel direction than in the crown-sole direction. The front surface of the face portion 3 is flat excepting small grooves or punch marks (not shown) provided in the clubface 2. The back surface 3B of the face portion 3 is provided with a patterned indentation in order to provide a specific thickness distribution for the face portion 3.
The face portion 3 is therefore, provided with:
The thickness Tc of the central thick part 10, the thickness Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12, the thickness TT of the toe-side thinner part 13, and the thickness TH of the heel-side thinner part 14 satisfy the following conditional expressions (1) and (2):
Tc>=Tr>TT (1)
Tr>TH (2)
The central thick part 10 has an outline shape which is generally an ellipse or oval long in the toe-heel direction and roughly similar to but smaller than the contour shape of the clubface 2. The central thick part 10 is, as shown in
The central region of the face portion 3 receives large impulsive forces on sweet-spot shots, therefore, in order to provide sufficient durability for the face portion 3, the central thick part 10 is provided with the largest thickness Tc. Preferably, the thickness Tc is not less than 3.10 mm, more preferably not less than 3.25 mm, but not more than 4.00 mm, more preferably not more than 3.85 mm.
The thickness Tc is substantially constant.
If the thickness Tc is more than 4.00 mm, the coefficient of restitution and the depth of the center of gravity of the head are liable to decrease, and deterioration in directionality of hit balls tends to occur.
If the area Ac of the central thick part 10 is very small, the durability of the face portion 3 deteriorates, therefore, the area Ac is preferably not less than 13%, more preferably not less than 15% of the overall area of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3. However, if the area Ac is very large, it is difficult to improve the coefficient of restitution and the directionality of the hit ball, therefore, the area Ac is preferably not more than 30%, more preferably not more than 25%, still more preferably not more than 23% of the overall area of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3.
Here, the overall area of the back surface 3B is preferably set in a range of not less than 36 sq·cm, more preferably not less than 38 sq·cm, but not more than 47 sq·cm, more preferably not more than 45 sq·cm.
The overall area of the back surface 3B is almost same as the overall area of the clubface.
The thicknesses Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 and the sole-side thick part 12 are equal to or less than the thickness Tc of the central thick part 10.
The thickness Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 can be differed from the thickness Tr of the sole-side thick part 12, for example, the sole-side thick part 12 can be thicker than the crown-side thick part 11. In this embodiment, however, the thickness Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 is substantially same as the thickness Tr of the sole-side thick part 12.
In either case, each of the thicknesses Tr is substantially constant.
If the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12 are thicker than the central thick part 10, then the coefficient of restitution of the face portion 3 is greatly decreased, thus it is not preferable. Especially, the rigidity of the peripheral part of the central thick part 10 is increased, and thereby the carry distance on miss shots is decreased remarkably. On the other hand, if the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12 are too thin, then there is a possibility that the durability of the face portion 3 decreases. In this light, the thicknesses Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 and the sole-side thick part 12 are preferably not less than 90%, more preferably not less than 93% of the thickness Tc of the central thick part 10.
In the front view of the head under the standard state as shown in
the extension K2 of the widthwise center line of the sole-side thick part 12 towards the crown portion 4 passes through on the toe-side of the centroid Zc of the central thick part 10.
In other words, the centroid Zc of the central thick part 10 is positioned on the toe-side of the extension K1 and on the heel-side of the extension K2.
As shown in
The edge 3e of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3 is, as shown in
The horizontal distance L1 between the extension K1 of the crown-side thick part 11 and the centroid Zc of the central thick part 10, and the horizontal distance L2 between the extension K2 of the sole-side thick part 12 and the centroid Zc of the central thick part 10 are each set in a range of not less than 3 mm, preferably not less than 4 mm, more preferably not less than 5 mm, but not more than 12 mm, preferably not more than 11 mm, more preferably not more than 10 mm.
If the distance L1 and/or distance L2 are/is more than 12 mm, there is a possibility that the face portion 3 can not be reinforced effectively. If less than 3 mm, the carry distance on miss shots is liable to decrease.
In the front view of the head under the standard state as shown in
the widthwise center line (extension K2) of the sole-side thick part 12 is also inclined to the toe from the crown towards the sole at an angle θ2 in a range of from 10 to 40 degrees with respect to the vertical direction.
More preferably, the angles θ1 and θ2 are not less than 15 degrees, still more preferably not less than 20 degrees, but not more than 35 degrees, still more preferably not more than 33 degrees, most preferably not more than 30 degrees. As a result, the durability of the face portion 3 can be further improved.
If the angles θ1 and θ2 are less than 10 degrees or more than 40 degrees, the effect to reinforce the face portion 3 decreases.
Preferably, the absolute value |θ1−θ2| of the difference between the angles θ1 and θ2 is not more than 10 degrees, more preferably not more than 5 degrees, still more preferably not more than 3 degrees. In other words, the two widthwise center lines are substantially parallel with each other.
In the front view under the standard state, the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12 each have a width Wr of less than the maximum width Wc of the central thick part 10. As a result, the improvement in the durability and the weight reduction of the face portion 3 are compatible with each other.
Here, the width Wr of the crown-side thick part 11 is defined by a value measured at the position of its centroid Zu perpendicularly to the widthwise center line.
The width Wr of the sole-side thick part 12 is defined by a value measured at the position of its centroid Zd perpendicularly to the widthwise center line.
The maximum width Wc of the central thick part 10 is defined by a maximum width measured perpendicularly to the direction inclined at the mean value {(θ1+θ2)/2} of the angles θ1 and θ2 of the two widthwise center lines.
The ratio (Wr/Wc) is preferably set in a range of not less than 0.18, more preferably not less than 0.23, but not more than 0.35, more preferably not more than 0.30.
As a result, an excessive increase in the coefficient of restitution can be prevented, while maintaining the strength of the central region of the face portion 3.
Each of the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12 is arranged such that the minimum distance between its centroid Zu, Zd and the extension K1,K2 becomes not more than 5 mm, preferably not more than 3 mm, more preferably not more than 1 mm.
In each of the thick parts 11 and 12, the width Wr is substantially constant along the widthwise center line, and smaller than the length of the widthwise center line.
But, it is also possible to vary the width Wr, for example, the thick part 11 and/or thick part 12 can be gradually increased in the width Wr towards the central thick part 10 and/or toward the edge 3e of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3.
In this embodiment, the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12 have the same width Wr. However, for example, the sole-side thick part 12 can be formed as being wider than the crown-side thick part 11 in order to improve the durability or strength.
The total area (Sru+Srd) of the thick parts 11 and 12 is preferably not less than 4%, more preferably not less than 6%, but not more than 12%, more preferably not more than 10% of the overall area of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3.
If the total area is less than 4%, it becomes difficult to effectively increase the durability of the face portion 3 in the crown-sole direction. If the total area is more than 12%, there is a possibility that the coefficient of restitution and the directionality of hit balls deteriorate.
The above-mentioned toe-side thinner parts 13 in this example comprises: a toe-side-middle minimum-thickness part 13a disposed on the toe-side of the central thick part 10; a toe-side-upper medium-thickness part 13b disposed between the part 13a and the crown-side thick part 11; and a toe-side-lower medium-thickness part 13c disposed between the part 13a and the sole-side thick part 12.
The above-mentioned heel-side thinner parts 14 in this example compress:
The thickness Tc of the central thick part 10, the thicknesses Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 and sole-side thick part 12, the thickness Tt of the toe-side-middle minimum-thickness part 13a, the thickness Th of the heel-side-middle minimum-thickness part 14a, the thicknesses Tto of the toe-side-upper medium-thickness part 13b and toe-side-lower medium-thickness part 13c, and the thicknesses Tho of the heel-side-upper medium-thickness part 14b and heel-side-lower medium-thickness part 14c satisfy the following conditional expressions (3) and (4):
Tc>=Tr>Tto>Tt (3)
Tr>Tho>Th (4)
The thicknesses Tt and Th of the minimum-thickness part 13a and 14a are preferably not less than 1.70 mm, more preferably not less than 1.85 mm, but not more than 2.30 mm, more preferably not more than 2.15 mm.
As a result, the weight of the face portion 3 can be reduced. Further, the deflection of the face portion 3 at the time of off-center shot towards toe or heel, is increased and the deterioration in the rebound performance is lessened.
If less than 1.70 mm, the durability of the face portion 3 is liable to become insufficient. If more than 2.30 mm, the deflection of the face portion 3 decreases, and the loss of the carry distance tends to increase.
The thicknesses Tr and Tr are each substantially constant.
The ratio (Tc/Tt) of the thickness Tc to the thickness Tt is preferably set in a range of from 1.40 to 2.00.
The ratio (Tc/Th) of the thickness Tc to the thickness Th is preferably set in a range of from 1.40 to 2.00.
If the ratios are increased, then the coefficient of restitution becomes increased, but there is a tendency that stress concentration occurs between the central thick part 10 and minimum-thickness parts 13a, 14a. If the ratios are decreased, then the coefficient of restitution tends to decrease.
The minimum-thickness parts 13a and 14a extend along the above-mentioned straight line N around which ball hitting positions of the average golfers concentrate.
For that purpose, in the front view of the head under the standard state as shown in
The width Wu of each of the minimum-thickness parts 13a and 14a measured at the centroid SU1, SU2 perpendicularly to the straight line K3 is preferably set in a range of not less than 7 mm, more preferably not less than 10 mm, but not more than 25 mm, more preferably not more than 20 mm.
As a result, the face portion is effectively deflected even when missed shot, and the loss of the carry distance is minimized.
If the width Wu is less than 7 mm, then stress is liable to concentrate on the minimum-thickness part, and the durability is greatly decreased. If the width Wu is more than 25 mm, then the strength and durability are decreased at the interface between the minimum-thickness part 13a, 14a and the edge 3e of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3.
The total area (St+Sh) of the minimum-thickness parts 13a and 14a is preferably not less than 8%, more preferably not less than 9%, but not more than 20%, more preferably not more than 18% of the overall area of the back surface 3B of the face portion 3.
The ratio (St/Sh) is preferably in a range of from 0.8 to 1.2. If the total area is less than 8%, the deflection of the face portion 3 becomes insufficient when off-center shot toward the toe or heel is made and the coefficient of restitution is decreased. If the total area is more than 20%, the durability of the face portion 3 tends to deteriorate.
The thicknesses Tto of the toe-side medium-thickness parts 13b and 13c are more than the thickness Tt of the minimum-thickness part 13a, and less than the thicknesses Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 and the sole-side thick part 12.
The thicknesses Tho of the heel-side medium-thickness parts 14b and 14c are more than the thickness Th of the minimum-thickness part 14a, and less than the thicknesses Tr of the crown-side thick part 11 and the sole-side thick part 12.
The medium-thickness parts 13b, 13c, 14b and 14c can decrease the stress concentrated on the minimum-thickness part and improve the durability of the face portion 3.
If the thickness Tto and Tho of the medium-thickness parts are decreased, then the durability of the club head tends to decrease, and further, there is a possibility that the coefficient of restitution is excessively increased and it becomes difficult to comply with golf rules.
If the thickness Tto and Tho are increased, then the coefficient of restitution is decreased, and the weight of the face portion 3 is increased.
Therefore, the thickness Tto and Tho of the medium-thickness parts are preferably not less than 1.90 mm, more preferably not less than 2.00 mm, but not more than 2.50 mm, more preferably not more than 2.35 mm.
In order to enhance the above-explained effects, the ratio (Tr/Tto) is preferably not less than 1.22, more preferably not less than 1.25, but not more than 1.50, more preferably not more than 1.45.
The ratio (Tr/Tho) is preferably not less than 1.22, more preferably not less than 1.25, but not more than 1.50, more preferably not more than 1.45.
The ratio (Tto/Tt) is preferably not less than 1.08, more preferably not less than 1.10, but not more than 1.24, more preferably not more than 1.21.
The ratio (Tho/Th) is preferably not less than 1.08, more preferably not less than 1.10, but not more than 1.24, more preferably not more than 1.21.
In order to improve the durability and coefficient of restitution of the face portion 3 in a well balanced manner, the total area (Stu+Std+Shu+Shd) of the area Stu of the toe-side-upper medium-thickness parts 13b, the area Std of the toe-side-lower medium-thickness parts 13c, the area Shu of the heel-side-upper medium-thickness parts 14b, and the area Shd of the heel-side-lower medium-thickness parts 14c is preferably not less than 28%, more preferably not less than 30%, but not more than 51%, more preferably not more than 49% of the overall area of the back surface 3e of the face portion 3.
Furthermore, in order to prevent stress concentration and improve the durability of the face portion 3, thickness transitional parts are provided.
As shown in
On the toe-side and heel-side of the crown-side thick part 11, there are provided a second thickness transitional part 21 whose thickness is decreased continuously from the crown-side thick part 11 to the medium-thickness part 13b, 14b.
On the toe-side and heel-side of the sole-side thick part 12, there are provided a third thickness transitional part 22 whose thickness is decreased continuously from the sole-side thick part 12 to the medium-thickness part 13c, 14c.
Further, as shown in
On the upper side and lower side of the heel-side-middle minimum-thickness parts 14a, there is provided a fifth thickness transitional part 24 whose thickness is increased continuously from the part 14a to the medium-thickness part 14b, 14c.
Further, the maximum variation of the thickness, namely, the difference between the thickness Tc of the central thick part 10 and the thickness Tt, Th of the minimum-thickness part 13a, 14a is preferably less than 2.5 mm, more preferably less than 2.0 mm, still more preferably less than 1.7 mm.
Comparison Tests
Wood-type golf club heads were manufactured and tested for the durability and coefficient of restitution.
All of the heads had identical structures shown in
The specifications of the patterned indentations are shown in Table 1.
The main body was a lost-wax precision casting of a titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. The face plate was made by hot forging a titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. The face plate was fixed to the main body by Tig welding. The head volume was 460 cc. The overall area of the back surface of the face portion was 42.0 sq·cm.
Restitution Coefficient Test:
According to the “procedure for Measuring the velocity Ratio of a club Head for conformance to Rule 4-1e, Appendix II, Revision 2 (Feb. 8, 1999), United States Golf Association”, the coefficient of restitution COR of each club head was obtained with respect to five hitting positions.
The five hitting positions were: the sweet spot SS; a top-side position and a sole-side position at a distance of 10 mm from the sweet spot along the clubface toward the upside and downside, respectively; and a toe-side position and a heel-side position at a distance of 20 mm from the sweet spot along the clubface toward the toe and heel, respectively.
The results are shown in Table 1, wherein the obtained OCR values of each head are indicated by an index for the head based on the value of the COR at the sweet spot being 100, and the larger value is better.
Durability Test:
The club heads were attached to identical carbon shafts (“SV-3003J”, flex X manufactured by SRI Sports Limited) to make 45-inch wood clubs, and each club was mounted on a swing robot and hit golf balls 10,000 times (maximum) at the sweet spot at the head speed of 54 m/s, while visually checking the club head every 100 times. If any damage was observed, the number of hits was recorded. The test results are shown in Table 1.
From the test results, it was confirmed that, in the golf club heads Exs. 1, 2 and 3, the decrease in the coefficient of restitution from the value measured at the sweet spot to the values measured at the toe-side position and heel-side position was lessened, therefore, if ball hitting positions are off centered, loss of the carry distance can be lessened.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-097402 | Apr 2008 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2087685 | Hackney | Jul 1937 | A |
| 6899638 | Iwata et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6997820 | Willett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7220190 | Hirano | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7481717 | Knuth | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7578755 | Oyama | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7607992 | Nishio | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7614964 | Matsunaga | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7618331 | Hirano | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7713140 | Gibbs et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7749102 | Nakamura | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 20030144079 | Yoneyama | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20080248896 | Hirano | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 08155060 | Jun 1996 | JP |
| 10137372 | May 1998 | JP |
| 2001286586 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2002045445 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2003154040 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003245384 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2006-175135 | Jul 2006 | JP |
| 2007097647 | Apr 2007 | JP |
| 2009247497 | Oct 2009 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090253533 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |
