The present disclosure relates to a golf club head, and more specifically to a wood-type club head such as a driver.
Golfers prefer golf clubs that exhibit performance characteristics such as forgiveness and playability. One measure of “forgiveness” can be defined as the ability of a golf club head to reduce the effects of mis-hits, e.g., hits resulting from striking the golf ball at a less than ideal impact location on the golf club head, on flight trajectory and shot distance. Greater forgiveness of the golf club head generally equates to a higher probability of hitting a straight golf shot. “Playability” can be defined as the ease with which a golfer can use the golf club head for producing accurate golf shots.
Golf club forgiveness is directly affected by the moments of inertia of the golf club head. A moment of inertia is a measure of the club head's resistance to twisting about the golf club head's center-of-center gravity, for example on impact with a golf ball. In general, a moment of inertia of a mass about a given axis is proportional to the square of the distance of the mass away from the axis. In other words, increasing the distance of a mass from a given axis results in an increased moment of inertia of the mass about that axis. Higher golf club head moments of inertia result in lower golf club head rotation on impact with a golf ball, particularly on off-center impacts with a golf ball, e.g., mis-hits. Lower rotation in response to a mis-hit results in a player's perception that the club head is forgiving. Moreover, higher moments of inertia typically result in greater ball speed on impact with the golf club head, which can translate to increased golf shot distance.
The application describes a metal wood-type (or hybrid-type) golf club having a highly positioned upper surface to provide a favorable aerodynamic profile and counterbalancing features to maintain a relatively low CG and high MOI.
Different features and embodiments are described including a crown having a peripheral edge in relative close proximity to a ground plane reference, crown made as a separate piece from a lighter weight material than the rest of the club head body, inverted aft cavity, flatter sole, extension member attached to an underside of a rear portion of the sole to add mass low and back on the club body, stepped down crown in combination with an overlying lightweight shroud to maintain a favorable aerodynamic profile, shroud that is cantilevered along at least a portion of its length and creates an open cavity between the shroud and stepped down crown, and/or one or more ribs in the interior of the body to provide selective reinforcement and tune acoustic properties of the club head body.
Other features and embodiments include a golf club head having one or more of the following features in combination:
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The present disclosure is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements.
Various embodiments and aspects of the disclosure will be described with reference to details discussed below, and the accompanying drawings will illustrate the various embodiments. The following description of the drawings is illustrative of the disclosed embodiments and not to be construed as limiting the disclosure. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments of the present disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to provide a concise discussion of embodiments of the present disclosure.
A typical metal-wood golf club such as a fairway wood or driver includes a hollow shaft having a lower end to which a hollow club head is attached.
The body may be made of a metal alloy (e.g., an alloy of titanium, an alloy of steel, an alloy of aluminum, and/or an alloy of magnesium), but also can be made of a composite material, such as a graphitic composite, a ceramic material, or any combination thereof. The crown, sole and skirt can be integrally formed using a technique such as molding, cold forming, casting, and/or forging. The strike plate can be integrally formed with the body or may be a separate piece attached to the body. The strike plate can be made of a composite material, metal alloy (e.g., titanium, steel, aluminum, and/or magnesium), ceramic material or a combination of composite, metal alloy and/or ceramic materials. Strike plates made at least partially of a composite material are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,267,620, 7,140,974, 7,874,936, 7,874,937, and 7,874,938, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Further, the strike plate can have a variable thickness, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,997,820, 6,800,038, 6,824,475, and 7,066,832, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. See, for example, the strike plate 14k in
The mass of the club head is distributed so as to improve the forgiveness and other characteristics of the head. Forgiveness on a golf shot is generally maximized by configuring the golf club head such that the center of gravity (“CG”) of the golf club head is optimally located and the MOI of the golf club head is maximized. For example, it can be desirable to configure the CG lower on the club head, nearer the sole. One countervailing factor however is that a relatively high crown provides a more desirable aerodynamic profile for the club. But a high crown, though desirable, also works against efforts to maintain a lower CG. The aerodynamics of golf club heads are discussed in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,777,773, 8,088,021, 8,540,586, 8,858,359, 8,597,137, 8,771,101, 8,083,609, 8,550,936, 8,602,909, and 8,734,269, the teachings of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Various different MOI values may be used to characterize the golf club. For example, MOI about the vertical axis (Izz) and MOI about the heel toe axis (Ixx). Golf club head moments of inertia are typically defined about 3 axes extending through the golf club head CG: (1) a CG z-axis extending through the CG in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground; (2) a CG x-axis extending through the CG in a heel-to-toe direction generally parallel to the strike plate and generally perpendicular to the CG z-axis; and (3) a CG y-axis extending through the CG in a front-to-back direction and generally perpendicular to the CG x-axis and the CG z-axis. The CG x-axis and the CG y-axis both extend in a generally horizontal direction relative to the ground when the club head is at the normal address position. Typically, however, the MOI about z-axis (Izz) is most relevant to club head forgiveness. The MOI about the x-axis (Ixx) also is important, especially at higher club head volumes, while the MOI about the y-axis has less influence on golf club forgiveness.
To achieve higher MOI's, the mass of the club head can be distributed, as much as possible, strategically around the periphery of the club head. The total mass of the club head can be considered the club head's “mass budget.” It is axiomatic that at least some of the mass be dedicated to achieving the required strength and structural support of the club head. This is termed “structural” mass. Any mass remaining in the budget is called “discretionary” or “performance” mass, which can be distributed about the club head to maximize performance. Mass shift, properly executed, may be able to maximize Izz and Ixx together, rather than sacrificing one for the sake of the other.
The conventional metal-wood driver illustrated in
The embodiment of
It also means that the crown's peripheral edge (and thus a portion of the crown's surface area, especially in the rear or aft region) is positioned relatively low with respect to a reference ground plane. In one embodiment, the distance from the ground plane to the lowest point on crown 24a in a mid-face cross-section, referred to as GPD in
The embodiment of
The extension 28 adds mass low and aft on the club head and thereby shifts the CG of the club head in a direction that is lower and more rearward. A CG shifted lower on the CG z-axis and more rearward on the CG y-axis can help improve forgiveness and playability of the club head in many designs.
The crown 24c is extended downwardly compared to typical crowns, such that the crown's peripheral edge drops down to a lower point before joining the upturned sole 22c. This configuration promotes a flatter sole and moves a portion of the crown's peripheral edge closer to the bottom of the sole. The distance between the crown's peripheral edge and the closest point to a ground plane on which the club head rests in an address position is designated GPD for “ground plane distance.” The GPD preferably is no greater than about 11.9 mm in one embodiment, as measured from the crown's lowest point in a mid-face cross-section as shown in
The aft cavity 30d has an opening or mouth that projects (at least in part) generally rearwardly. The aft cavity itself is relatively shallow compared to the size and volume of the club head body's large hollow interior. The aft cavity projects into the hollow interior a modest fraction of the head's depth from front to back as, for example, about ⅛ of the depth. The geometry and position of the aft cavity allows a large surface area of the sole 22d to remain relatively flat and close to the ground plane. The flatter sole contributes to a lower CG for the head body, promoting better performance. In addition, the configuration shown allows the trailing edge of the crown to terminate closer to the ground plane (i.e., smaller GDP) in a way that also promotes ease of manufacture.
Like the
The step down crown 24g and shroud 30g create a large cavity 32g that defines a much larger volume than prior embodiments and preferably projects far more deeply into what would otherwise be the hollow interior of the club head body. The cavity 32g preferably projects inwardly over 50% of the depth of the club head, as measured from the club head body's leading edge to trailing edge. In other embodiments, the aft cavity may project inwardly about 20%, about 30%, about 40% or about 60% of the depth of the club head.
In some embodiments, the open aft cavity 32g defines a volume (using an imaginary plane to close the opening between the rearmost point on the sole and rearmost point on the shroud) that is at least 10% of the volume of the club head's enclosed interior, at least 20% of the volume of the club head's enclosed interior, at least 30% of a club head's enclosed interior, at least 40% of the club head's enclosed interior or at last 50% of the club head's enclosed interior.
The club head body of
As with the
The club head preferably includes ribs 34h, 36h, 40h and 42h. The rib 36h is coupled at one end to a relatively flat aft portion of the crown 24h and at its other end to a steeply inclined forward portion of the crown 24h. The rib 34h preferably is coupled at one end to an aft portion of the rib 36h and at its other end to an aft portion of the cantilevered shroud 30h. The ribs 34h and 36h are located in the aft cavity 32h. The rib 40h preferably is located in the head's main interior chamber, and is coupled at one end to a steep forward portion of the crown 24h and at its other end to a location proximate to where the crown 24h joins the faceplate 14h. The rib 42h likewise is located in the head's main interior chamber, and preferably is coupled at one end to a relatively flat centrally-located portion of the crown 24h and at its other end to the sole 22h. It will be appreciated that the ribs 34h, 36h, 40h, 42h may have varying physical attributes, such as shape, material, strength, flexibility, damping properties and other material properties, and may be coupled at their ends to alternate locations on various structural components of the club head. For example, in
The ribs provide a way to easily and flexibly reinforce certain parts of the club head and, equally important, adjust or fine tune the acoustic properties of the club head to approximate the acoustic properties of a traditional driver-type club. In addition, the shroud 30h gives the club head a look similar to traditional driver-type clubs, especially when viewed from the top, while allowing the mass associated with the crown 24h to be lowered considerably, thereby lowering the CG of the club head and improving the club head's forgivability and playability.
In the area where the crown 24i joins the strike plate 14i, an annular recess or ledge is formed in the crown to receive an upper crown 46 (or shroud) which provides a smooth, arcuate surface extending rearwardly from the strike plate 14i. The upper crown 46 preferably is made of a composite or other lightweight material and generally occupies the position of a conventionally situated crown. The upper crown 46 also may be considered a shroud because it hides or covers the space overlying the stepped-down crown 24i. Unlike the shroud 30g or 30h, however, the upper crown or shroud 46 is not cantilevered, but rather has an aft section that is turned back on itself by about 180 degrees to form an inverted aft skirt portion 26i and is secured by adhesion or otherwise to the crown 24i at an internal lap joint 48.
The upper crown or shroud 46 cooperates with the crown 24i to define an aft or upper chamber 50. The upper chamber 50 overlies a substantial portion of the club head's main interior chamber as, for example, at least 50% of the front to back length of the main interior chamber. Unlike the aft cavities described above, the upper chamber 50 is fully enclosed and does not have an external rearwardly facing opening or mouth.
The club head may have one or more interior ribs of varying physical or other properties/characteristics, as described above, including, for example, a single arcuate rib 52 joined at one end to the upper crown 46 and at its other end to a location proximate to the lap joint (either by attaching to the turned back portion of the upper crown 46 itself or to the crown 24i). It will be appreciated that the rib 52 can be coupled to the club head at other locations or to other structural members as part of a fine-tuning process.
The crown 24i′ s stepped down or drop-down configuration lowers the CG of the club head and enhances performance. The stepped down crown 24i presents a convex surface to the main interior chamber of the club head. The composite upper crown or shroud 46 and its inverted configuration creates a second fully enclosed interior space, cavity or chamber that provides an alternative way of adjusting the acoustic properties of the club head because the club head no longer has a cavity or bay that is open on one or more sides. The holes 44 and variations thereof provide yet another way to flexibly and easily alter the acoustic properties of the club head as well as create discretionary mass savings that can be strategically located elsewhere on the club head body to increase MOI and enhance performance.
It will be appreciated that the inverted aft skirt portion 26j may be modified to have various configurations. For example, in
For example, in certain embodiments of the present invention the golf club head may be attached to the shaft via a removable head-shaft connection assembly as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,431, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Further in certain embodiments, the golf club head may also incorporate features that provide the golf club heads and/or golf clubs with the ability not only to replaceably connect the shaft to the head but also to adjust the loft and/or the lie angle of the club by employing a removable head-shaft connection assembly. Such an adjustable lie/loft connection assembly is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,025,587, 8,235,831, 8,337,319, as well as U.S. Publication No. 2011/0312437A1, U.S. Publication No. 2012/0258818A1, U.S. Publication No. 2012/0122601A1, U.S. Publication No. 2012/0071264A1 as well as U.S. application Ser. No. 13/686,677, filed on Nov. 27, 2012, the entire contents of which patent, publications and application are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
The foregoing embodiments provide a highly-positioned crown or shroud to provide a desirable aerodynamic profile for the club head, while maintaining a relatively low CG despite the high crown's (or shroud's) influence on the CG to the contrary. The modest mass of the highly-located shroud/upper crown is offset or countered by providing a lightweight shroud having a mass less than a traditional crown, extending the shroud or crown to have a peripheral edge with a low GPD value such that a portion of the shroud/crown's peripheral surface area is nearer to the ground plane at address position than traditional crowns, providing a flatter sole such that a larger portion of the sole's expanse is maintained in contact with or nearer the ground plane at address position, and/or providing a (lower) crown that steps down such that a large portion of the lower crown's mass is positioned much lower relative to the ground plane compared to traditional crowns. In this way, a relatively low and desirable CG can be achieved even with a highly situated upper crown or shroud in place to promote desirable air flow and aerodynamic properties during the golf swing.
While the foregoing description has been provided in the context of a driver-type golf club head, it will be appreciated that the principles and teachings herein may be applied to other types of “metal-woods,” such as fairway wood or hybrid club heads.
It also will be appreciated that each of the disclosed embodiments can be used in combination with other club head features such as sole channels, movable weights, adjustable shafts and the like. For example, the embodiments disclosed may be used in combination with slidable repositionable weights positioned in the sole and/or skirt.
Among other advantages, a slidably repositionable weight facilitates the ability of the end user of the golf club to adjust the location of the CG of the club head over a range of locations relating to the position of the repositionable weight. Further detail concerning the slidably repositionable weight feature is provided in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,775,905 and 8,444,505 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/898,313 filed on May 20, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 62/020,972, filed Jul. 3, 2014, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/047,880 filed on Oct. 7, 2013, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as well the contents of U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014/0080622 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2014/0080628, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
By way of example,
A composite shroud 60 extends rearwardly from a turned upper edge of the strike plate 14k to provide a smooth, continuous and relatively high surface to give the club head a desirable aerodynamic profile. The shroud 60 is inverted at the aft end and its end is attached to the crown 24k at an internal lap joint. The inverted shroud 60 defines an enclosed secondary interior chamber 64 that at least partially overlies the primary interior chamber 62. The sole 22k may be provided with a thickened aft portion 66 to provide additional mass low and aft in the club head and thereby desirably shift the overall CG of the club head still lower and more rearward.
The intermediate and/or rear section may be perforated to remove mass from the crown 90 while maintaining the crown's integrity as a structural support member of the club head. The perforations (not shown) can have various sizes, shapes and locations to free up discretionary mass that can be allocated elsewhere.
The forward crown section 90a preferably is an integral extension of the strike plate frame 70, and is secured by adhesion or otherwise to a forward segment of the shroud 74. The rear section 90c of the crown 90 preferably is joined by adhesion or otherwise to a rear portion of the shroud 74 which is bent backwardly on itself (i.e., inverted) to form a cavity or recess at the aft skirt portion 78. The shroud may have other shapes and configurations and may not have an inverted skirt section at all.
The head may be provided with interior ribs in the primary or secondary interior chambers to provide enhanced structural support and rigidity and/or desirable acoustic properties. For example, ribs 94a, 94b preferably are joined as part of the original cast piece (or alternatively by welding or other fastening techniques) to different portions of the crown 90, such as intermediate section 90b and rear section 90c. As such, the ribs 94a, 94b are located in the secondary interior chamber 93. However, ribs in various shapes and sizes may be located in the primary interior chamber and/or at other sites in the secondary interior chamber. Also, the ribs may be perforated to free up mass that may be allocated elsewhere.
As shown in
In some embodiments at least a portion of the shroud overlies at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or 90% of the crown's length (or depth) in the front to back direction (i.e., Y axis).
In some preferred embodiments, the golf club head preferably has a Delta 1 of about 8 to 28 mm, preferably about 11 to 25 mm, and more preferably about 14 to 22 mm. As one example, the head may have a Delta 1 of 16.1 mm. Delta 1 is a measure of how far rearward the head's CG is located in the “y” axis. The Delta 1 distance is measured along the “y” axis from a vertical plane passing through the hosel axis. Put another way, Delta 1 is the distance between the CG and hosel axis along the “y” axis (in a direction straight toward the back of the body of the club face from the geometric center of the striking face).
In some embodiments, the head preferably has a CG Projection of about −3 to 7 mm, more preferably about −1 to 5 mm, and most preferably about 0 to 4 mm. As one example, the head may have a CG Projection of 0.45 mm. CG Projection is a projection of the head's CG on to the head's striking surface that intersects with a line that is normal to the tangent line of the ball striking surface and passes through the CG. A positive number indicates that the CG Projection is above the geometric center of the face, and a negative number indicates that the CG Projection is below the geometric center of the face.
In some embodiments, the head has a CGz of about 2 to −10 mm, preferably about 0 to −8 mm, and most preferably about −2 to −6 mm. In one example, the head has a CGz of about −5.2 mm. CGz is the location of the head's CG on the “z” axis.
In some embodiments, the head has a Z-up of about 20 to 36 mm, preferably about 23 to 33 mm, and most preferably about 25 to 31 mm. In one example, the head may have a Z-up of about 24.7 mm. Z-up is a measure of the CG's distance from the ground plane (GP).
In some embodiments, the head may have Ixx and Izz of about 200 to 450 kg·mm2 and 300 to 600 kg·mm2 respectively; more preferably 230 to 390 kg·mm2 and 330 to 530 kg·mm2 respectively; and most preferably 260 to 320 kg·mm2 and 360 to 490 kg·mm2 respectively. In one example, the head may have respective Ixx and Izz of about 283 kg·mm2 and 385 kg·mm2. As described above, Ixx and Izz are measures of the club head's MOI relative to respective X and Z axes.
In summary, the CA is a relatively flat portion of the crown surrounding the apex of the crown (i.e., highest point of the crown in a certain orientation) and aids in keeping airflow attached to the club head (i.e., laminar flow) once it flows over the crown prior to and past the drop contour crown apex. The CA is determined by slicing the crown with a horizontal plane spaced 8 mm below the apex of the crown when the crown is pitched upward about a centerface tangent to a pitch angle of 12 degrees, as described more fully in U.S. Pat. No. 8,858,359. As so oriented, the peak height or apex of the crown is located, and a horizontal drop plane is located parallel to and 8 mm below the crown apex. An area CA (96 in
In some embodiments, the head has a CA of 1600 to 7800 mm2, more preferably 3000 to 6000 mm2, and most preferably 4000 to 5000 mm2.
In one example, the CA may be 4724 mm2, the CGZ is −5.2 mm, the Z-up is 24.7 mm, Ixx is 283 kg-mm2, and Izz 385 kg-mm2
It has been discovered that favorable CA properties in combination with a low strategically placed CG and one or more other features described herein provide a club head with very favorable aerodynamic and ball striking performance, including favorable forgiveness characteristics on mishits.
The components of the embodiments disclosed herein can be formed from any of various suitable metals, metal alloys, polymers, composites, or various combinations thereof.
In addition to those noted elsewhere herein, examples of metals and metal alloys that can be used to form the components include, without limitation, carbon steels (e.g., 1020 or 8620 carbon steel), stainless steels (e.g., 304 or 410 stainless steel), PH (precipitation-hardenable) alloys (e.g., 17-4, C450, or C455 alloys), titanium alloys (e.g., 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), aluminum/aluminum alloys (e.g., 3000 series alloys, 5000 series alloys, 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6, and 7000 series alloys, such as 7075), magnesium alloys, copper alloys, nickel alloys, and tungsten.
Examples of composites that can be used to form the components include, without limitation, glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP), carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP), metal matrix composites (MMC), ceramic matrix composites (CMC), and natural composites (e.g., wood composites).
Examples of polymers that can be used to form the components include, without limitation, thermoplastic materials (e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, acrylic, PVC, ABS, polycarbonate, polyurethane, polyphenylene oxide (PPO), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polyether block amides, nylon, and engineered thermoplastics), thermosetting materials (e.g., polyurethane, epoxy, and polyester), copolymers, and elastomers (e.g., natural or synthetic rubber, EPDM, and Teflon®).
The designs, embodiments and features described herein may be combined with other club head features and technologies including:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/975,117, which was filed on Dec. 18, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/096,605, which was filed on Dec. 24, 2014, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4431192 | Stuff, Jr. et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4444392 | Duclos | Apr 1984 | A |
4653756 | Sato | Mar 1987 | A |
4762322 | Molitor et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
D412729 | Woodward | Aug 1999 | S |
6315678 | Termoto | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6623374 | Helmstetter et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6800038 | Willett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824475 | Burnett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
D506518 | Jones | Jun 2005 | S |
6997820 | Willett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7066832 | Willett et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128660 | Gillig | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140974 | Chao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7166040 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186190 | Beach et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7223180 | Willett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7407447 | Beach et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410426 | Willett et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419441 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7448963 | Beach et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452285 | Chao et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7530904 | Beach et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540811 | Beach et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568985 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591738 | Beach et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621823 | Beach et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628707 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632194 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7713142 | Hoffman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717804 | Beach et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717805 | Beach et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744484 | Chao | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7775905 | Beach et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7874936 | Chao | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874937 | Chao | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874938 | Chao | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7963861 | Beach et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
RE42544 | Chao et al. | Jul 2011 | E |
7985146 | Lin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8012038 | Beach et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8025587 | Beach et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8070621 | Nakano | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083609 | Burnett et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088021 | Albertsen et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096897 | Beach et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8162775 | Tavares et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8272974 | Mickelson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8303431 | Beach et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8337319 | Sargent et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8353786 | Beach et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8444505 | Beach et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8540586 | Albertsen et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8550936 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8597137 | Albertsen et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8602909 | Burnett et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8628434 | Chao | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8734269 | Burnett et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8734271 | Beach et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753224 | Kim | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8771101 | Albertsen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8858359 | Willett et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870678 | Beach et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8979671 | Demille et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9033821 | Beach et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9149693 | Stites et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9393471 | Beno et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9421438 | Beno et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9452327 | Willett et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9914030 | Cleghorn | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9937390 | Luttrell | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9950219 | Larson | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10046211 | Franklin | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20010041625 | Satoh et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051548 | Iwata | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020065146 | Kusumoto | May 2002 | A1 |
20030050130 | Wade | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050075185 | Green | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050277486 | Hyman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070004534 | Lee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070054751 | Breier et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070117648 | Yokota | May 2007 | A1 |
20080149267 | Chao | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080182681 | Yokota | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090163289 | Chao | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163292 | Chao | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090247313 | Nakano | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100273566 | Matsunaga | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110053703 | Stites | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110152000 | Sargent et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110281664 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120071264 | Beach et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120122601 | Beach et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120258818 | Beach et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289360 | Breier | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130109500 | Boyd | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123040 | Willett et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130217513 | Amano | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225319 | Kato | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130288820 | Shimahara | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130331201 | Wahl | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140080622 | Sargent et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140080628 | Sargent et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140080634 | Golden | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150005095 | Ehlers | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160001146 | Sargent et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160059093 | Nielson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160250534 | Solheim | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160375321 | Greaney | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20190060719 | Greaney | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190091526 | Bacon | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170368428 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62096605 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14975117 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 15699895 | US |