Patent Grant
10646755
With the ever-increasing popularity and competitiveness of golf, substantial effort and resources are currently being expended to improve golf clubs. Much of the recent improvement activity has involved the combination of the use of new and increasingly more sophisticated materials in concert with advanced club-head engineering. For example, modem “wood-type” golf clubs (notably, “drivers,” “fairway woods,” and “utility or hybrid clubs”), with their sophisticated shafts and non-wooden club-heads, bear little resemblance to the “wood” drivers, low-loft long-irons, and higher numbered fairway woods used years ago. These modem wood-type clubs are generally called “metalwoods” since they tend to be made of strong, lightweight metals, such as titanium.
An exemplary metalwood golf club such as a driver or fairway wood typically includes a hollow shaft having a lower end to which the club-head is attached. Most modern versions of these club-heads are made, at least in part, of a lightweight but strong metal such as titanium alloy. In most cases, the club-head comprises a body to which a face plate (used interchangeably herein with the terms “face” or “face insert” or “striking plate” or “strike plate”) is attached or integrally formed. The strike plate defines a front surface or strike face that actually contacts the golf ball.
Some current approaches to reducing structural mass of a metalwood club-head are directed to making at least a portion of the club-head of an alternative material. Whereas the bodies and face plates of most current metalwoods are made of titanium alloy, several club-heads are available that are made, at least in part, of components formed from either graphite/epoxy-composite (or other suitable composite material) and a metal alloy. Graphite composites have a density of approximately 1.5 g/cm3, compared to titanium alloy which has a density of 4.5 g/cm3, which offers tantalizing prospects for providing more discretionary mass in the club-head.
The ability to utilize such materials to increase the discretionary mass available for placement at various points in the club-head allows for optimization of a number of physical properties of the club-head which can greatly impact the performance obtained by the user. Forgiveness on a golf shot is generally maximized by configuring the golf club head such that the center of gravity (“CG”) of the golf club head is optimally located and the moment of inertia (“MOI”) of the golf club head is maximized.
However, to date there have been relatively few golf club head constructions involving a polymeric material as an integral component of the design. Although such materials possess the requisite light weight to provide for significant weight savings, it is often difficult to utilize these materials in areas of the club head subject to stresses resulting from the high speed impact of the golf ball.
For example, some current metalwoods incorporate weight tracks in the sole to support slidable weights which allow the golfer to adjust the performance characteristics of the club by changing the weight position and effective center of gravity (CG) of the club head. The weight track is generally made from cast titanium to handle the high stress resulting from the high speed impact of the golf ball. Although titanium and titanium alloys are comparatively light in the context of other metals, titanium is still relatively heavy, requires a number of reinforcing ribs and produces undesirably low first modal frequencies (when the ball is struck). A heavier construction for the weight track and ribs means less discretionary weight is available for placement in strategic locations that benefit club performance.
Another recent trend in the industry is to make the club head out of strong, yet lightweight materials such as, for example, titanium, titanium alloys, steel alloys or a carbon fiber composite material. Of these materials, carbon fiber composites are particularly interesting to golf club designers because it has a density that is roughly one third of the density of titanium but is almost as strong as titanium.
Despite the strength and low density of carbon fiber composites, club heads that are made entirely of carbon fiber composites are generally not popular. This is due, in part, to the relatively high stiffness that is typical of carbon fiber composites. Moreover, carbon fiber composites are not particularly durable. Thus, composite club heads have a tendency to wear out in the areas that are subjected to large amounts of wear and friction (e.g., the sole of the club head).
To overcome the above-identified issues, a variety of multi-material metal-composite club heads have been developed. In one example, a metal-composite golf club head has a main metal body with a cast opening located on top of the metal body opposite the sole of the club head. The periphery of the opening includes an inner peripheral flange configured to mate with a peripheral edge of a top cover or “crown plate” or shell made of a composite material (e.g., carbon fiber or graphite). The crown plate is sized and shaped to fit within the top opening such that the peripheral edge of the crown plate mates with the inner peripheral flange of the opening along the entire periphery of the crown plate. In this way, the crown plate completely covers and seals the cast opening. During manufacturing, however, tolerance variations in the dimensions of the main metal body, the cast opening and/or the crown plate can cause the adjoining surfaces at the interface or joint between the crown plate and metal body to be uneven (i.e., not flush). Such fluctuations at these joints cause serious cosmetic defects that must be corrected, resulting in higher manufacturing times and costs and reduced yield of finished products.
When manufacturing conventional multi-material metal-composite club heads, in order to achieve a flush fit between the main body and the crown plate, one or both of the components (e.g., a top plate of the main body and/or the crown plate), is typically made thicker than necessary so that one or both components can be ground down to achieve a flush fit at the joint. Alternatively, or additionally, an extra amount of epoxy or other bonding material can be applied between adjoining surfaces at the joint between the mating components such that a significant amount of epoxy/bonding material will typically accumulate over the joint. This excess epoxy or bonding material, after it is cured, must then be ground down to achieve a flush surface at the joint, and thereafter painted to achieve a desired finished appearance. Needless to say, grinding down one or both components and/or grinding down excess epoxy increases the amount of time and labor necessary to manufacture a finished multi-material metal-composite club head.
In addition to the above problems associated with conventional multi-material metal-composite club heads, the above-described processes of grinding down extra component material and/or grinding down excess bonding material adds an undesired variability in the final weight of the club head, which can adversely affect the performance or “feel” of the club to a user. Furthermore, since any areas that must be ground down must be painted over to achieve a finished appearance, the amount of composite material surface area that remains visible to a user is significantly decreased. Additionally, even after grinding of excess material and/or bonding material is performed, as described above, if there is still a small amount of unevenness at the joint due to the top surface of the crown plate being slightly higher or lower than an adjacent top surface of the main body, the paint covering the joint will show a faint line where the unevenness exists. This faint line is referred to as “ghosting” and is undesirable because it imparts an aesthetic of “cheapness” or “poor design” to a user of the golf club.
In view of the above-described problems associated with conventional multi-material material golf club heads and their methods of manufacture, there is a need for improved golf club head designs and methods of manufacture that address one or more of the above-identified problems.
In one embodiment, the golf club head may include a sole insert made of a material suitable to have a part injection molded thereto, and a thermoplastic composite head component overmolded on the sole insert to create a sole insert unit. The sole insert unit is joined to the frame and overlies the sole opening.
The composite head component overmolded on the sole insert may include one or more ribs to reinforce the head, one or more ribs to tune acoustic properties of the head, one or more weight ports to receive a fixed weight in a sole portion of the head, one or more weight tracks to receive one or more slidable weights, any combinations thereof, and other features.
The sole insert may be made from a thermoplastic composite material, thermoplastic carbon composite material, a continuous fiber thermoplastic composite material suitable for thermoforming, as well as other materials.
The weight track may be made from a thermoplastic composite material including a matrix compatible for binding with the sole insert material.
The golf club head may include a sole insert and weight track, each of which is made from a thermoplastic composite material having a compatible matrix to facilitate injection molding the weight track over the sole insert.
The sole insert and weight track each may be made from a thermoplastic carbon composite material having a compatible matrix selected from the group consisting of, for example, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), nylon, polyamides, polypropylene, thermoplastic polyurethanes, thermoplastic polyureas, polyamide-amides (PAD, polyether amides (PEI), polyetheretherketones (PEEK), and any combination thereof.
The sole insert may also be made from a thermoset composite material suitable for thermosetting and coated with a heat activated adhesive to facilitate the weight track being injection molded over the sole insert.
The frame may be made from a metal material such as, for example, titanium, one or more titanium alloys, aluminum, one or more aluminum alloys, steel, one or more steel allows, and any combination thereof.
The sole and crown inserts may be made of a thermoplastic composite material including fibers such as, for example, glass fibers, aramide fibers, carbon fibers and any combination thereof, and include a thermoplastic matrix selected from the group consisting of polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polyamides, polypropylene, thermoplastic polyurethanes, thermoplastic polyureas, polyamide-amides (PAI), polyether amides (PEI), polyetheretherketones (PEEK), and any combinations thereof.
The sole insert and/or crown insert may be thermoformed from a continuous fiber composite material.
The golf club head may include a metal frame having a sole opening, a composite laminate crown insert joined to the frame, a composite laminate sole insert joined to the frame and overlying the sole opening, and a thermoplastic composite weight track overmolded on the sole insert.
A method of making the golf club head may include forming a frame having a sole opening, forming a composite laminate sole insert, injection molding a thermoplastic composite head component over the sole insert to create a sole insert unit, and joining the sole insert unit to the frame.
The sole and crown inserts may be formed by thermoforming using composite materials suitable for thermoforming.
The sole and/or crown inserts may be formed by thermosetting using materials suitable for thermosetting.
The thermoset sole and/or crown insert may be coated with a heat activated adhesive to facilitate injection molding a thermoplastic composite component over the sole and/or crown insert, such as one or more weight tracks, weight ports, ribs, supports or other features for strengthening, adding rigidity, acoustic tuning or other purposes. In a further embodiment, a golf club head includes; a main body comprising an opening and a recessed flange formed along at least a portion of a peripheral edge defining the opening; at least one compressible shim disposed on a top surface of the flange, the at least one compressible shim being compressible to at least 50% of its original uncompressed thickness; and a crown plate shaped and sized to fit within the opening, wherein a first portion of a bottom surface of the crown plate is affixed to the top surface of the flange and a second portion of the bottom surface is disposed on top of the at least one compressible shim, wherein the compressible shim is in a compressed state such that a top surface of the crown plate is flush with an adjacent top surface of the main body.
In another embodiment, a golf club head includes: a main body comprising an opening and a recessed flange formed along at least a portion of a peripheral edge defining the opening; at least one compressible shim disposed on a surface of the flange, the at least one compressible shim wherein the at least one compressible shim having a shim area that is 1% to 50% of an available area on the surface of the flange; and a cover plate shaped and sized to fit within the opening, wherein a first portion of a mating surface of the cover plate is affixed to the surface of the flange and a second portion of the mating surface is disposed on top of the at least one compressible shim, wherein the compressible shim is in a compressed state such that an outer surface of the cover plate is flush with an adjacent surface of the main body.
In another embodiment, a method for manufacturing a golf club head is disclosed. The method includes: providing a main body of the golf club head, the main body having an opening; attaching at least one compressible shim to a flange within the opening; placing a cover plate within the opening on top of the at least one compressible shim and the flange, wherein the cover plate covers the entirety of the opening; adjusting an amount of compression of the at least one compressible shim so that an outer surface of the cover plate is flush with an adjacent outer surface of the main body; and applying a bonding material between the cover plate and the flange so as to permanently affix the cover plate to the main body while the outer surface of the cover plate is flush with the adjacent outer surface of the main body.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The following describes embodiments of golf club heads in the context of a driver-type golf club, but the principles, methods and designs described may be applicable in whole or in part to fairway woods, utility clubs (also known as hybrid clubs) and the like.
The following inventive features include all novel and non-obvious features disclosed herein both alone and in novel and non-obvious combinations with other elements. As used herein, the phrase “and/or” means “and,” “or” and both “and” and “or.” As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” refer to one or more than one, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, the term “includes” means “comprises.”
The following also makes reference to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof. The drawings illustrate specific embodiments, but other embodiments may be formed and structural changes may be made without departing from the intended scope of this disclosure. Directions and references (e.g., up, down, top, bottom, left, right, rearward, forward, heelward, toeward, etc.) may be used to facilitate discussion of the drawings but are not intended to be limiting. For example, certain terms may be used such as “up,” “down,” “upper,” “lower,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left,” “right” and the like. These terms are used where applicable, to provide some clarity of description when dealing with relative relationships, particularly with respect to the illustrated embodiments. Such terms are not, however, intended to imply absolute relationships, positions and/or orientations. For example, with respect to an object, an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning the object over. Nevertheless, it is still the same object. Accordingly, the following detailed description shall not be construed in a limiting sense and the scope of property rights sought shall be define by the appended claims and their equivalents.
In one example, a driver-type club head 10 is shown in
The sole of the frame 24 preferably is integrally formed with a lateral weight track 36, which extends generally parallel to and near the face of the club head and generally perpendicular to the weight track 30. The lateral weight track 36 defines a track or port for mounting (in one exemplary embodiment) one or more slidable weights that are fastened to the weight track. In the example shown in
Unlike
The lateral weight track of
With the single lateral weight design shown in
The frame 24 preferably has a lower sole opening sized and configured to receive the sole insert 28, and an upper crown opening sized and configured to receive the crown insert 26. More specifically, the sole opening receives a sole insert unit including the sole insert 28 and weight track 30 joined thereto (as described below). The sole and crown openings are each formed to have a peripheral edge or recess to seat, respectively, the sole insert unit and crown insert 26, such that the sole and crown inserts are either flush with the frame 24 to provide a smooth seamless outer surface or, alternatively, slightly recessed.
Though not shown, the frame 24 preferably has a face opening to receive a face plate or strike plate 42 that is attached to the frame by welding, braising, soldering, screws or other fastening means.
The frame 24 may be made from a variety of different types of materials but in one example is made of a metal material such as a titanium or titanium alloy (including but not limited to 6-4 titanium, 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), or aluminum and aluminum alloys (including but not limited to 3000 series alloys, 5000 series alloys, 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6, and 7000 series alloys, such as 7075). The frame may be formed by conventional casting, metal stamping or other known processes. The frame also may be made of other metals as well as non-metals. The frame provides a framework or skeleton for the club head to strengthen the club head in areas of high stress caused by the golf ball's impact with the face, such as the transition region where the club head transitions from the face to the crown area, sole area and skirt area located between the sole and crown areas.
In one exemplary embodiment, the sole insert 28 and/or crown insert 26 may be made from a variety of composite and polymeric materials, and preferably from a thermoplastic material, more preferably from a thermoplastic composite laminate material, and most preferably from a thermoplastic carbon composite laminate material. For example, the composite material may be an injection moldable material, thermoformable material, thermoset composite material or other composite material suitable for golf club head applications. One exemplary material is a thermoplastic continuous carbon fiber composite laminate material having long, aligned carbon fibers in a PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) matrix or base. One commercial example of this type of material, which is manufactured in sheet form, is TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 manufactured by Lanxess.
TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 is a high strength, lightweight material having multiple layers of continuous carbon fiber reinforcement in a PPS thermoplastic matrix or polymer to embed the fibers. The material may have a 54% fiber volume but other volumes (such as a volume of 42 to 57%) will suffice. The material weighs 200 g/m2.
Another similar exemplary material which may be used for the crown and sole inserts is TEPEX® DYNALITE 208. This material also has a carbon fiber volume range of 42 to 57%, including a 45% volume in one example, and a weight of 200 g/m2. DYNALITE 208 differs from DYNALITE 207 in that it has a TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) matrix or base rather than a polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) matrix.
By way of example, the TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 sheet(s) (or other selected material such as DYNALITE 208) are oriented in different directions, placed in a two-piece (male/female) matched die, heated past the melt temperature, and formed to shape when the die is closed. This process may be referred to as thermoforming and is especially well-suited for forming the sole and crown inserts.
Once the crown insert and sole insert are formed (separately) by the thermoforming process just described, each is cooled and removed from the matched die. The sole and crown inserts are shown as having a uniform thickness, which lends itself well to the thermoforming process and ease of manufacture. However, the sole and crown inserts may have a variable thickness to strengthen select local areas of the insert by, for example, adding additional plies in select areas to enhance durability, acoustic or other properties in those areas.
As shown in
In an alternative embodiment, the sole insert 28 and/or crown insert 26 can be made by a process other than thermoforming, such as injection molding or thermosetting. In a thermoset process, the sole insert and/or crown insert may be made from prepreg plies of woven or unidirectional composite fiber fabric (such as carbon fiber) that is preimpregnated with resin and hardener formulations that activate when heated. The prepreg plies are placed in a mold suitable for a thermosetting process, such as a bladder mold or compression mold, and stacked/oriented with the carbon or other fibers oriented in different directions. The plies are heated to activate the chemical reaction and form the sole (or crown) insert. Each insert is cooled and removed from its respective mold.
The carbon fiber reinforcement material for the thermoset sole/crown insert may be a carbon fiber known as “34-700” fiber, available from Grafil, Inc., of Sacramento, Calif., which has a tensile modulus of 234 Gpa (34 Msi) and tensile strength of 4500 Mpa (650 Ksi). Another suitable fiber, also available from Grafil, Inc., is a carbon fiber known as “TR50S” fiber which has a tensile modulus of 240 Gpa (35 Msi) and tensile strength of 4900 Mpa (710 Ksi). Exemplary epoxy resins for the prepreg plies used to form the thermoset crown and sole inserts are Newport 301 and 350 and are available from Newport Adhesives & Composites, Inc., of Irvine, Calif.
In one example, the prepreg sheets have a quasi-isotropic fiber reinforcement of 34-700 fiber having an areal weight of about 70 g/m2 and impregnated with an epoxy resin (e.g., Newport 301), resulting in a resin content (R/C) of about 40%. For convenience of reference, the primary composition of a prepreg sheet can be specified in abbreviated form by identifying its fiber areal weight, type of fiber, e.g., 70 FAW 34-700. The abbreviated form can further identify the resin system and resin content, e.g., 70 FAW 34-700/301, R/C 40%.
In a preferred embodiment, the weight track 30 which has more details and 3-D features than the sole insert 28, is made from the same, similar or at least compatible material as the sole insert to allow the weight track to be injection molded, overmolded, or insert molded over the sole insert to bond the two parts together to form the sole insert unit. The weight track 30 preferably is made from a polymeric material suitable for injection molding, preferably a thermoplastic material, more preferably a thermoplastic composite laminate material, and most preferably a thermoplastic carbon composite laminate material. One exemplary material suitable for injection molding is a thermoplastic carbon fiber composite material having short, chopped fibers in a PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) base or matrix. For example, the weight track material may include 30% short carbon fibers (by volume) having a length of about 1/10 inch, which reinforces the PPS matrix.
One example of a commercial material that may be used for the weight track is RTP 1385 UP, made by RTP Company. Other examples include nylon, RTP 285, RTP 4087 UP and RTP 1382 UP. In a preferred example, the crown insert, sole insert and weight track 30 are made from compatible materials capable of bonding well to one another such as polymeric materials having a common matrix or base, or at least complementary matrices. For example, the crown insert and sole insert may be made from continuous fiber composite material well suited for thermoforming while the weight track is made of short fiber composite material well suited for injection molding (including insert molding and overmolding), with each having a common PPS base.
The sole insert unit is formed by placing the thermoplastic composite sole insert 28 in a mold and injection molding the thermoplastic weight track 30 over the sole insert (as, for example, by insert molding or overmolding). The injection molding process creates a strong fusion-like bond between the sole insert and weight track due to their material compatibility, which preferably includes a compatible polymer/matrix (PPS in one preferred example). The terms injection molding (over), insert molding and overmolding generally refer to the same process, but to the extent there are differences, all such processes are believed to be sufficiently similar as to be suitable for forming the sole insert unit.
In the alternative process in which the sole insert 28 is formed using a thermosetting material, the thermoset sole insert and thermoplastic weight track 30 are not compatible materials and will not bond well if left untreated. Accordingly, before the injection molding, insert molding, or overmolding step, the thermoset sole insert 28 preferably is coated with a heat activated adhesive as, for example, ACA 30-114 manufactured by Akron Coating & Adhesive, Inc. ACA 30-114 is a heat-activated water-borne adhesive having a saturated polyurethane with an epoxy resin derivative and adhesion promoter designed from non-polar adherents. It will be appreciated that other types of heat-activated adhesives also may be used.
After the coating step, the coated thermoset sole insert is then placed in a mold and the thermoplastic composite weight track material is overmolded (or injection molded) over the sole insert as described above. During the injection molding step, heat activates the adhesive coating on the sole insert to promote bonding between the sole insert and the weight track material.
Notably, though not necessary, the alternative thermoplastic composite sole insert made using a thermoforming process, as described above, also may be coated with a heat-activated adhesive prior to the overmolding step to promote an even stronger bond with the main body, notwithstanding that the thermoplastic sole insert and weight track thermoplastic material already are compatible for bonding if they have common or at least complementary matrices.
If the crown insert is made from a thermoset material and process, there is no need to coat the crown insert because no thermoplastic material is overmolded to the crown insert in the exemplary embodiments described herein. In the event additional thermoplastic features or 3-D details are overmolded on the crown insert, the same bonding principles discussed with respect to the weight track and sole insert apply.
Once the sole insert unit (sole insert 28 and weight track 30) and crown insert 26 are formed, they are joined to the frame 24 in a manner that creates a strong integrated construction adapted to withstand normal stress, loading and wear and tear expected of commercial golf clubs. For example, the sole insert unit and crown insert each may be bonded to the frame using epoxy adhesive, with the crown insert seated in and overlying the crown opening and the sole insert unit seated in and overlying the sole opening. Alternative attachment methods include bolts, rivets, snap fit, adhesives, other known joining methods or any combination thereof.
Equally important, since the ribs are injection molded they can have a wide variety of shapes, sizes, orientations, and locations on the sole insert to adjust and fine tune acoustic properties of the club head. It can be seen in
The composite sole and weight track disclosed in various embodiments herein overcome manufacturing challenges associated with conventional club heads having titanium or other metal weight tracks, and replace a relatively heavy weight track with a light composite material (freeing up discretionary mass which can be strategically allocated elsewhere within the club head). For example, additional ribs can be strategically added to the hollow interior of the club head and thereby improve the acoustic properties of the head. Ribs can be strategically located to strengthen or add rigidity to select locations in the interior of the head. Discretionary mass in the form of ribs or other features also can be strategically located in the interior to shift the effective CG fore or aft, toeward or heelward or both (apart from any further CG adjustments made possible by slidable weight features).
Also, embodiments described herein having continuous fiber composite sole and crown inserts are especially effective in providing improved structural support and stiffness to the club head, as well as freeing up discretionary mass that can be allocated elsewhere.
In the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Though not shown, the frame 224 preferably has a face opening to receive a face plate or strike plate 242 that is attached to the frame by welding, braising, soldering, screws or other fastening means.
The sole of the frame 324 preferably is integrally formed with a lateral weight track 336, which extends generally parallel to and near the face of the club head and generally perpendicular to the weight track 330. The lateral weight track 336 defines a track or port for mounting (in one exemplary embodiment) one or more slidable weights that are fastened to the weight track. In the present embodiment the lateral weight track 336 slideably mounts only on one lateral weight 341. The weight 341 may comprise a single weight element, multiple weight elements or two stacked weight elements fastened together by a screw 340.
The lateral weight track of
The frame 324 preferably has two lower sole openings 329a and 329b sized and configured to receive the sole inserts 328a and 328b respectively, and an upper crown opening 331 sized and configured to receive the crown insert 326. The sole and crown openings are each formed to have a peripheral edges or recess 352 as shown in
Though not shown, the frame 324 preferably has a face opening to receive a face plate or strike plate 342 that is attached to the frame by welding, braising, soldering, screws or other fastening means.
In the golf club heads of the present invention, the ability to adjust the relative magnitude of the slidably adjusted weights and rearward weights coupled with the weight saving achieved by incorporation of the composite sole and crown inserts allows for a large range of variation of a number properties of the club-head all of which affect the ultimate club-head performance including both the position of the CG of the club-head and its various MOI values.
Generally, the center of gravity (CG) of a golf club head is the average location of the weight of the golf club head or the point at which the entire weight of the golf club-head may be considered as concentrated so that if supported at this point the head would remain in equilibrium in any position. A club head origin coordinate system can be defined such that the location of various features of the club head, including the CG can be determined with respect to a club head origin positioned at the geometric center of the striking surface and when the club-head is at the normal address position (i.e., the club-head position wherein a vector normal to the club face substantially lies in a first vertical plane perpendicular to the ground plane, the centerline axis of the club shaft substantially lies in a second substantially vertical plane, and the first vertical plane and the second substantially vertical plane substantially perpendicularly intersect).
The head origin coordinate system defined with respect to the head origin includes three axes: a z-axis extending through the head origin in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground; an x-axis extending through the head origin in a toe-to-heel direction generally parallel to the striking surface (e.g., generally tangential to the striking surface at the center) and generally perpendicular to the z-axis; and a y-axis extending through the head origin in a front-to-back direction and generally perpendicular to the x-axis and to the z-axis. The x-axis and the y-axis both extend in generally horizontal directions relative to the ground when the club head is at the normal address position. The x-axis extends in a positive direction from the origin towards the heel of the club head. The y axis extends in a positive direction from the head origin towards the rear portion of the club head. The z-axis extends in a positive direction from the origin towards the crown. Thus for example, and using millimeters as the unit of measure, a CG that is located 3.2 mm from the head origin toward the toe of the club head along the x-axis, 36.7 mm from the head origin toward the rear of the clubhead along the y-axis, and 4.1 mm from the head origin toward the sole of the club head along the z-axis can be defined as having a CGx of −3.2 mm, a CGy of −36.7 mm, and a CGz of −4.1 mm.
Further as used herein, Delta 1 is a measure of how far rearward in the club head body the CG is located. More specifically, Delta 1 is the distance between the CG and the hosel axis along the y axis (in the direction straight toward the back of the body of the golf club face from the geometric center of the striking face). It has been observed that smaller values of Delta 1 result in lower projected CGs on the club head face. Thus, for embodiments of the disclosed golf club heads in which the projected CG on the ball striking club face is lower than the geometric center, reducing Delta 1 can lower the projected CG and increase the distance between the geometric center and the projected CG. Recall also that a lower projected CG creates a higher dynamic loft and more reduction in backspin due to the z-axis gear effect. Thus, for particular embodiments of the disclosed golf club heads, in some cases the Delta 1 values are relatively low, thereby reducing the amount of backspin on the golf ball helping the golf ball obtain the desired high launch, low spin trajectory.
Similarly Delta 2 is the distance between the CG and the hosel axis along the x axis (in the direction straight toward the back of the body of the golf club face from the geometric center of the striking face).
Adjusting the location of the discretionary mass in a golf club head as described above can provide the desired Delta 1 value. For instance, Delta 1 can be manipulated by varying the mass in front of the CG (closer to the face) with respect to the mass behind the CG. That is, by increasing the mass behind the CG with respect to the mass in front of the CG, Delta 1 can be increased. In a similar manner, by increasing the mass in front of the CG with the respect to the mass behind the CG, Delta 1 can be decreased.
In addition to the position of the CG of a club-head with respect to the head origin another important property of a golf club-head is a projected CG point on the golf club head striking surface which is the point on the striking surface that intersects with a line that is normal to the tangent line of the ball striking club face and that passes through the CG. This projected CG point (“CG Proj”) can also be referred to as the “zero-torque” point because it indicates the point on the ball striking club face that is centered with the CG. Thus, if a golf ball makes contact with the club face at the projected CG point, the golf club head will not twist about any axis of rotation since no torque is produced by the impact of the golf ball. A negative number for this property indicates that the projected CG point is below the geometric center of the face.
In terms of the MOI of the club-head (i.e., a resistance to twisting) it is typically measured about each of the three main axes of a club-head with the CG as the origin of the coordinate system. These three axes include a CG z-axis extending through the CG in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground when the club head is at normal address position; a CG x-axis extending through the CG origin in a toe-to-heel direction generally parallel to the striking surface (e.g., generally tangential to the striking surface at the club face center), and generally perpendicular to the CG z-axis; and a CG y-axis extending through the CG origin in a front-to-back direction and generally perpendicular to the CG x-axis and to the CG z-axis. The CG x-axis and the CG y-axis both extend in generally horizontal directions relative to the ground when the club head is at normal address position. The CG x-axis extends in a positive direction from the CG origin to the heel of the club head. The CG y-axis extends in a positive direction from the CG origin towards the rear portion of the golf club head. The CG z-axis extends in a positive direction from the CG origin 150 towards the crown 112. Thus, the axes of the CG origin coordinate system are parallel to corresponding axes of the head origin coordinate system. In particular, the CG z-axis is parallel to z-axis, the CG x-axis is parallel to x-axis, and CG y-axis is parallel to y-axis.
Specifically, a club head as a moment of inertia about the vertical axis (“Izz”), a moment of inertia about the heel/toe axis (“Ixx”), and a moment of inertia about the front/back axis (“Iyy”). Typically, however, the MOI about the z-axis (Izz) and the x-axis (Ixx) is most relevant to club head forgiveness.
A moment of inertia about the golf club head CG x-axis (Ixx) is calculated by the following equation:
Ixx=∫(y2+z2)dm (1)
where y is the distance from a golf club head CG xz-plane to an infinitesimal mass dm and z is the distance from a golf club head CG xy-plane to the infinitesimal mass dm. The golf club head CG xz-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG x-axis and the golf club head CG z-axis. The CG xy-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CGx-axis and the golf club head CG y-axis.
Similarly, a moment of inertia about the golf club head CG z-axis (Izz) is calculated by the following equation:
Izz=∫(x2+y2)dm (2)
where x is the distance from a golf club head CG yz-plane to an infinitesimal mass dm and y is the distance from the golf club head CG xz-plane to the infinitesimal mass dm. The golf club head CG yz-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG y-axis and the golf club head CG z-axis.
A further description of the coordinate systems for determining CG positions and MOI can be found US Patent Publication No. 2012/0172146 A1 publishing on Jul. 5, 2012, the entire contents of which is incorporated by reference herein.
As shown in Table 1 below, the clubs of the present invention are able to achieve extremely high ranges of CGx, CGy, Delta 1 and Delta 2 and lxx, Iyy and projected CG position “BP” within the adjustability ranges of the club head. The values measured in Table 1 where obtained for a club-head having a volume of 452 cm3 when measured with an open front track and varying the distribution of the total discretionary weight as represented by the total; weight of the slidably adjusted weight 236 and the rearward weight 262 (which in the below example totals 44 g) by distributing it between the “front position ie the center point of the weight track 236 and the back position ie the location of the weight port of rearward weight 262.
The overmolded thermoplastic component described herein, exemplified by the weight track and ribs/support matrix incorporated into the weight track, illustrates the possibilities for adding design complexities and intricacies to the sole and crown portions of the club head, by overmolding or injection molding 3-dimensional or other features while integrating large composite portions of the head with metal portions. In addition to the one or more weight tracks, and support members and ribs described herein, incorporation of other features may also be facilitated to differing degrees by their overmolding or injection molding over a composite laminate sole and/or crown insert or, alternatively, over a composite laminate shell forming the crown, sole and/or skirt of the club head, as described herein, such features including;
For example, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,540,811 a golf club head may have a volume equal to the volumetric displacement of the club head body. In other words, for a golf club head with one or more weight ports within the head, it is assumed that the weight ports are either not present or are “covered” by regular, imaginary surfaces, such that the club head volume is not affected by the presence or absence of ports. A golf club head of the present application can be configured to have a head volume between about 110 cm3 and about 600 cm3. In more particular embodiments, the head volume is between about 250 cm3 and about 500 cm3. In yet more specific embodiments, the head volume is between about 300 cm3 and about 500 cm3, between 300 cm3 and about 360 cm3, between about 300 cm3 and about 420 cm3 or between about 420 cm3 and about 500 cm3.
The designs, embodiments and features described herein may also be combined with other features and technologies in the club-head including;
An additional embodiment of a golf club head 400 is shown in
The lateral weight track 430 is very similar to the weight track discussed above. Like the weight track 36, the weight track 430 spans much of the width of the sole and allows the weight 432 to be positioned proximate to the toe of the club head at one end of the track or proximate to the heel (and hosel) at the other end of the track. Likewise, the lateral (or heel-toe) weight track also is located forward on the sole, proximate to the club head's ball-striking surface or face area 412. In modest contrast, the weight track 430 has enlarged ends at the toe side and heel side. The weight track 430 also connects with a heel-side shaft connection port used to provide a fastener opening for connecting a removable shaft and/or FCT component to the club head.
The frame 424 may be made from a variety of different types of materials but in one example is made of a metal material such as a titanium or titanium alloy (including but not limited to 6-4 titanium, 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), or aluminum and aluminum alloys (including but not limited to 3000 series alloys, 5000 series alloys, 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6, and 7000 series alloys, such as 7075). The frame may be formed by conventional casting, metal stamping or other known processes. The frame also may be made of other metals as well as non-metals. The frame provides a framework or skeleton for the club head to strengthen the club head in areas of high stress caused by the golf ball's impact with the face, such as the transition region where the club head transitions from the face to the crown area, sole area and skirt area located between the sole and crown areas.
In one exemplary embodiment, the sole insert 28 and/or crown insert 26 may be made from a variety of composite and polymeric materials, preferably from a thermoplastic material, more preferably from a thermoplastic composite laminate material, and most preferably from a thermoplastic carbon composite laminate material. For example, the composite material may be an injection moldable material, thermoformable material, thermoset composite material or other composite material suitable for golf club head applications. One exemplary material is a thermoplastic continuous carbon fiber composite laminate material having long, aligned carbon fibers in a PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) matrix or base. One commercial example of this type of material, which is manufactured in sheet form, is TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 manufactured by Lanxess.
Additional information regarding materials and properties suitable for the sole and crown inserts is discussed above.
As shown in
The tie rib 444 preferably extends in a generally lateral heel-toe direction and is positioned generally midway between fore and aft ends of the opening 442. The tie rib 444 preferably has one or more raised portions 448 along its length, with channels or recesses therebetween, to create an undulating profile that preferably mates or nests with a complementary profile in the underside (i.e., interior) surface of the sole insert 428. The sole insert 428 preferably is adhered to the tie rib 444 and to a complementary sized and shaped recessed shelf 450 extending along the periphery of the sole insert opening 442. The sole insert may be secured to the main body 424 in other ways including the use of fasteners or other bonding techniques besides adhesion mentioned above.
A threaded weight 454 is shown threadably received in one of the fixed weight ports 446, which provides a complementary shaped threaded opening to receive the weight. Fixed weight(s) 454 may be removably fastened to the toe-side aft weight port, heel-side aft weight port, or both.
As shown in Table 2 below, one or more embodiments of the present disclosure are able to achieve high MOI (Ixx and Izz), relatively low CG (CGz) and a desirable Center of Gravity projection on the club face, also known as “balance point on the face” (BP Proj.). “Front d mass” denotes the mass of the slidable weight 432 in the lateral weight track 430. For example, the front slidable weight may be 10 g, 20 g or 15 g, as well as other values. “Back d mass” denotes the mass of the fixed aft weight(s), and includes the combined mass of weights in both weight ports 446a, b if two weights are installed. The back d mass (one or two weights), for example, may be 20 g, 10 g, 15 g or some other value. CGx and CGz represent center of gravity locations on the x and z coordinate axes, respectively.
Delta 1 (D1) represents the distance between the club head's CG and its hosel axis along the Y axis (in a direction straight toward the back of the body of the club head face from the geometric center of the face). Thus, for embodiments disclosed herein in which the projected CG (BP Proj.) on the ball striking face is lower than the geometric center, reducing Delta 1 produces a lower projected CG and a lower dynamic loft and creates a desirable further reduction in backspin due to the Z-axis gear effect. Thus, the embodiment of
“Mass” denotes the mass of the club head in grams. Ixx and Izz denote the moment of inertia of the club head about the x and z axes, respectively.
The values in Table 2 below represent club heads having a composite crown/composite sole and volume of about 460 cm3.
In this instance the foregoing properties and values are achieved with a laterally adjustable, forward-located weight and a pair of fixed weight ports located centrally and rearwardly on the club head, both of which may be integrally formed and cast as part of the main body or frame. The foregoing properties and values may also be achieved with relatively light polymer (or composite) sole and crown inserts.
A method of making a golf club may include one or more of the following steps:
In certain implementations of foregoing and later embodiments disclosed herein, the golf club head 10, 100, 300, 400, etc., may include alternative slidable weight features similar to those described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,775,905 and 8,444,505; 8,734,271 filed on May 20, 2013; U.S. Pat. No. 8,870,678, filed on Oct. 7, 2013; U.S. Patent Application No. 61/702,667, filed on Sep. 18, 2012; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/841,325, filed on Mar. 15, 2013; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/946,918, filed on Jul. 19, 2013; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/789,838, filed on Jul. 1, 2015; U.S. Patent Application No. 62/020,972, filed on Jul. 3, 2014; Patent Application No. 62/065,552, filed on Oct. 17, 2014; and Patent Application No. 62/141,160, filed on Mar. 31, 2015, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The metal wood club head 10, 100, 300, 400, etc. of foregoing and later embodiments disclosed herein has a volume, typically measured in cubic-centimeters (cm3), equal to the volumetric displacement of the club head 10, assuming any apertures are sealed by a substantially planar surface. (See United States Golf Association “Procedure for Measuring the Club Head Size of Wood Clubs,” Revision 1.0, Nov. 21, 2003). In other words, for a golf club head with one or more weight ports within the head, it is assumed that the weight ports are either not present or are “covered” by regular, imaginary surfaces, such that the club head volume is not affected by the presence or absence of ports. In several embodiments, a golf club head of the present application can be configured to have a head volume between about 110 cm3 and about 600 cm3. In more particular embodiments, the head volume is between about 250 cm3 and about 500 cm3. In yet more specific embodiments, the head volume is between about 300 cm3 and about 500 cm3, between 300 cm3 and about 360 cm3, between about 360 cm3 and about 420 cm3 or between about 420 cm3 and about 500 cm3.
In the case of a driver, the golf club head may have a volume between about 300 cm3 and about 460 cm3, and a total mass between about 145 g and about 245 g. In the case of a fairway wood, the golf club head may have a volume between about 100 cm3 and about 250 cm3, and a total mass between about 145 g and about 260 g. In the case of a utility or hybrid club the golf club head 10 may have a volume between about 60 cm3 and about 150 cm3, and a total mass between about 145 g and about 280 g.
Exemplary polymers for the embodiments described herein may include without limitation, synthetic and natural rubbers, thermoset polymers such as thermoset polyurethanes or thermoset polyureas, as well as thermoplastic polymers including thermoplastic elastomers such as thermoplastic polyurethanes, thermoplastic polyureas, metallocene catalyzed polymer, unimodalethylene/carboxylic acid copolymers, unimodal ethylene/carboxylic acid/carboxylate terpolymers, bimodal ethylene/carboxylic acid copolymers, bimodal ethylene/carboxylic acid/carboxylate terpolymers, polyamides (PA), polyketones (PK), copolyamides, polyesters, copolyesters, polycarbonates, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), cyclic olefin copolymers (COC), polyolefins, halogenated polyolefins [e.g. chlorinated polyethylene (CPE)], halogenated polyalkylene compounds, polyalkenamer, polyphenylene oxides, polyphenylene sulfides, diallylphthalate polymers, polyimides, polyvinyl chlorides, polyamide-ionomers, polyurethane ionomers, polyvinyl alcohols, polyarylates, polyacrylates, polyphenylene ethers, impact-modified polyphenylene ethers, polystyrenes, high impact polystyrenes, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers, styrene-acrylonitriles (SAN), acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylonitriles, styrene-maleic anhydride (S/MA) polymers, styrenic block copolymers including styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene, (SEBS) and styrene-ethylene-propylene-styrene (SEPS), styrenic terpolymers, functionalized styrenic block copolymers including hydroxylated, functionalized styrenic copolymers, and terpolymers, cellulosic polymers, liquid crystal polymers (LCP), ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymers (EPDM), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA), ethylene-propylene copolymers, propylene elastomers (such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,157, to Kim et al, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference), ethylene vinyl acetates, polyureas, and polysiloxanes and any and all combinations thereof.
Of these preferred are polyamides (PA), polyphthalimide (PPA), polyketones (PK), copolyamides, polyesters, copolyesters, polycarbonates, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), cyclic olefin copolymers (COC), polyphenylene oxides, diallylphthalate polymers, polyarylates, polyacrylates, polyphenylene ethers, and impact-modified polyphenylene ethers. Especially preferred polymers for use in the golf club heads of the present invention are the family of so called high performance engineering thermoplastics which are known for their toughness and stability at high temperatures. These polymers include the polysulfones, the polyetherimides, and the polyamide-imides. Of these, the most preferred are the polysufones.
Aromatic polysulfones are a family of polymers produced from the condensation polymerization of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone with itself or one or more dihydric phenols. The aromatic polysulfones include the thermoplastics sometimes called polyether sulfones, and the general structure of their repeating unit has a diaryl sulfone structure which may be represented as -arylene-SO2-arylene-. These units may be linked to one another by carbon-to-carbon bonds, carbon-oxygen-carbon bonds, carbon-sulfur-carbon bonds, or via a short alkylene linkage, so as to form a thermally stable thermoplastic polymer. Polymers in this family are completely amorphous, exhibit high glass-transition temperatures, and offer high strength and stiffness properties even at high temperatures, making them useful for demanding engineering applications. The polymers also possess good ductility and toughness and are transparent in their natural state by virtue of their fully amorphous nature. Additional key attributes include resistance to hydrolysis by hot water/steam and excellent resistance to acids and bases. The polysulfones are fully thermoplastic, allowing fabrication by most standard methods such as injection molding, extrusion, and thermoforming. They also enjoy a broad range of high temperature engineering uses.
The three must commercially important polysulfones are;
Particularly important and preferred aromatic polysulfones are those comprised of repeating units of the structure —C6H4SO2—C6H4—O— where C6H4 represents a m- or p-phenylene structure. The polymer chain can also comprise repeating units such as —C6H4—, C6H4—O—, —C6H4-(lower-alkylene)-C6H4—O—, —C6H4—O—C6H4—O—, —C6H4—S—C6H4—O—, and other thermally stable substantially-aromatic difunctional groups known in the art of engineering thermoplastics. Also included are the so called modified polysulfones where the individual aromatic rings are further substituted in one or substituents including
wherein R is independently at each occurrence, a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom or a hydrocarbon group or a combination thereof. The halogen atom includes fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine atoms. The hydrocarbon group includes, for example, a C1-C20 alkyl group, a C2-C20 alkenyl group, a C3-C20 cycloalkyl group, a C3-C20 cycloalkenyl group, and a C6-C20 aromatic hydrocarbon group. These hydrocarbon groups may be partly substituted by a halogen atom or atoms, or may be partly substituted by a polar group or groups other than the halogen atom or atoms. As specific examples of the C1-C20 alkyl group, there can be mentioned methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, amyl, hexyl, octyl, decyl and dodecyl groups. As specific examples of the C2-C20 alkenyl group, there can be mentioned propenyl, isopropepyl, butenyl, isobutenyl, pentenyl and hexenyl groups. As specific examples of the C3-C20 cycloalkyl group, there can be mentioned cyclopentyl and cyclohexyl groups. As specific examples of the C3-C20 cycloalkenyl group, there can be mentioned cyclopentenyl and cyclohexenyl groups. As specific examples of the aromatic hydrocarbon group, there can be mentioned phenyl and naphthyl groups or a combination thereof.
Individual preferred polymers, include,
having the abbreviation PSF and sold under the tradenames Udel®, Ultrason® S, Eviva®, RTP PSU,
having the abbreviation PPSF and sold under the tradenames RADEL® resin; and
having the abbreviation PPSF and sometimes called a “polyether sulfone” and sold under the tradenames Ultrason® E, LNP™, Veradel®PESU, Sumikaexce, and VICTREX® resin, “.and any and all combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, a composite material, such as a carbon composite, made of a composite including multiple plies or layers of a fibrous material (e.g., graphite, or carbon fiber including turbostratic or graphitic carbon fiber or a hybrid structure with both graphitic and turbostratic parts present. Examples of some of these composite materials for use in the metalwood golf clubs and their fabrication procedures are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/442,348 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,267,620), Ser. No. 10/831,496 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,140,974), Ser. Nos. 11/642,310, 11/825,138, 11/998,436, 11/895,195, 11/823,638, 12/004,386, 12,004,387, 11/960,609, 11/960,610, and 12/156,947, which are incorporated herein by reference. The composite material may be manufactured according to the methods described at least in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/825,138, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Alternatively, short or long fiber-reinforced formulations of the previously referenced polymers. Exemplary formulations include a Nylon 6/6 polyamide formulation which is 30% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 285. The material has a Tensile Strength of 35000 psi (241 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 638; a Tensile Elongation of 2.0-3.0% as measured by ASTM D 638; a Tensile Modulus of 3.30×106 psi (22754 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 638; a Flexural Strength of 50000 psi (345 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 790; and a Flexural Modulus of 2.60×106 psi (17927 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 790.
Also included is a polyphthalamide (PPA) formulation which is 40% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 4087 UP. This material has a Tensile Strength of 360 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1.4% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 41500 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 580 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 34500 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Also included is a polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) formulation which is 30% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 1385 UP. This material has a Tensile Strength of 255 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1.3% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 28500 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 385 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 23,000 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Especially preferred is a polysulfone (PSU) formulation which is 20% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 983. This material has a Tensile Strength of 124 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 2% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 11032 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 186 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 9653 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Also preferred is a polysulfone (PSU) formulation which is 30% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 985. This material has a Tensile Strength of 138 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1.2% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 20685 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 193 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 12411 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Also preferred is a polysulfone (PSU) formulation which is 40% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 987. This material has a Tensile Strength of 155 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 24132 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 241 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 19306 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
An additional embodiment of a golf club head 500 is shown in
The bottom perspective view of
As described above, the lateral weight track 536 defines a track proximate and generally parallel to the face 502 for mounting one or more one-piece or multi-piece slidable weights 541. The weight(s) may be laterally adjusted in the heel-toe direction to modify the performance characteristics of the head as previously described. Similarly, the weight track 530 defines a front-to-back weight track for mounting one or more one-piece or multi-piece slidable weight(s) 531. The weight(s) 531 may be slidably adjusted fore and aft to shift the CG of the club head in the front-to-rear direction, as previously described, and thereby modify the performance characteristics of the head (especially spin characteristics and height of golf balls launched by the head).
The periphery of opening 548 is proximate to and closely tracks the periphery of the crown on the toe-, aft-, and heel-sides of the head. The face-side of the opening 548 preferably is spaced farther from the face 502 (i.e., forwardmost region of the head) than the heel-, toe- and aft-sides of the opening are spaced from the skirt of the head. In this way, the head has additional frame mass and reinforcement in the crown area just rearward of the face 502. This area and other areas adjacent to the face along the toe, heel and sole support the face and are subject to the highest impact loads and stresses due to ball strikes on the face. As previously described, the frame may be made of a wide range of materials, including high strength titanium, titanium alloys, or other metals.
The opening 548 has a notch 554 which matingly corresponds to the crown insert notch 518 to help align and seat the crown insert on the crown.
In
The head's sole has a centrally-located fore-aft extending section 570 adjacent the weight track 558, which may be marked with weight track indicia (such as “high” to “low” ball flight) as shown in
Referring to
In one embodiment, the drop distance “D” may be in the range of about 2-12 mm, preferably about 3-9 mm, more preferably about 4-7 mm, and most preferably about 4.5-6.5 mm. In one example, the drop distance “D” is about 5.5 mm.
The bi-level or drop sole described is counterintuitive because the raised portion of the sole is tends to raise the CG of the club, which generally is disadvantageous. However, by using a sole insert made of a relatively light material such as composite material or other polymeric material (polysulfone for example), the higher CG effect is mitigated while maintaining a stronger, heavier material on the heel side of the sole to promote a lower CG and provide added strength in the area of the sole where it is most needed (i.e., in a sole region proximate to the hosel, shaft connection and FCT components where stress is high). Additionally, the drop sole allows for a smaller radius for a portion of the sole resulting in better acoustic properties due to the increased stiffness from the geometry. This stiffness increase means less ribs or even no ribs are needed to achieve a first mode frequency at 3400 Hz or above. Less ribs provides a weight savings which allows for more discretionary mass that can be strategically placed elsewhere in the club head or incorporated into a user adjustable movable weight.
In accordance with various embodiments, the golf club head 1100 can further include one or more adjustable weight features in a sole portion (not shown) opposite the top surface 106, and/or additional features, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,878,078 and 8,888,607, and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/789,838, entitled “Golf Club Head,” filed on Jul. 1, 2015, and U.S. application Ser. No. 14/855,190, entitled “Golf Club Heads,” filed on Sep. 15, 2015, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Generally, a lightweight material (e.g., a composite material) is selected to form the crown plate 1104, which is different from a material (e.g., a metal material) used to form the main body 1102 of the golf club head 1100. For example, the main body 1102 may be made from titanium or steel alloy and the crown plate 1104 may be made from a composite material such as a carbon fiber or graphite material. Carbon fiber and graphite composites typically have a density of about 1.5 g/cm3, compared to titanium alloy which typically has a density of about 4.5 g/cm3. Thus, the ability to manufacture a golf club head using a combination of titanium alloy and carbon fiber, for example, offers a wide range of possibilities for varying the mass of the club head, as well as distributing the mass within the club head. For example, considerable weight savings may be achieved by making, at least, the crown and/or other components (e.g., a sole, and/or a face plate) of the golf club head 1100 from one or more light-weight composite materials.
As discussed above, when the top surface 1204 of the crown plate 1104 is not flush with the top surface 1106 of the main body 1102, a number of problems can arise. Typically, one or both of the top surfaces 1204 and 1106 must be ground down to desired levels so that they become flush with one another. Such grinding takes additional time and resources and significantly impacts the production yield and costs when manufacturing a large number of golf club heads. Additionally, the grinding process mars or defaces the finish of the top surface 1204 and 1106 such that the marred portions of the top surface must be painted over to achieve a finished appearance. Thus, portions of the top surfaces 1204 and 1106 that are ground down must be concealed by paint, resulting in a smaller surface area of the natural finish of the respective surfaces 1204 and 1106 that remains visible to a user. This is undesirable for many types of materials such as carbon fiber, for example, which have an aesthetically pleasing surface appearance.
Alternative or additional techniques for achieving a flush fit or appearance at the joint 1202 include applying extra epoxy or bonding material (collectively referred to herein as “bonding material”) in the seam of the joint 1202 such that an excess amount of bonding material, indicated by dashed line 1208, remains present above the joint 1202 after curing. Typically, the bonding material is cured at a predetermined temperature for a predetermined duration of time so that it becomes hardened. The bonding material can be any suitable bonding material such as 3M™ Scotch-Weld™ DP 420 epoxy, which comes in various colors. The excess bonding material 1208 can then be ground down using traditional grinding techniques and equipment to achieve a flat, smooth surface above the joint 1202. After grinding down the excess bonding material 208, at least the area that is ground down must be painted to achieve a finished appearance. Thus, as shown in
As shown in
The following table provides examples A-I showing an example initial uncompressed shim height, a final compressed shim height, the delta between the uncompressed and compressed shim heights, and the percent the shim was compressed. In this example, an uncompressed height of 1.5 mm is used, however this is purely an example and several other heights could be used ranging from about 0.8 mm to about 2.0 mm depending on the application.
The percent the shim is compressed is calculated by subtracting the initial uncompressed shim thickness from the final compressed shim thickness, dividing the result by the initial uncompressed shim thickness, and finally multiplying by 100 percent. See equation (3) below for further clarification. The equation yields a negative percent change because the shim is being compressed i.e. the final thickness is less than the uncompressed shim thickness.
Percent Change=100%*(Tfinal−Tinitial)/Tinitial (3)
Additionally or alternatively, the percent change could also be expressed as an absolute percent change along with the word compression or tension to indicate the sign. In tensions the sign is positive and in compression the sign is negative. For example, a shim that is compressed at least 10% is the same as a shim that has a percent change of at least −10%.
Various elastomeric or spring materials having desired compression and rebound characteristics may be utilized in accordance with the present invention such as, for example, polymer springs, a plate spring, or Belleville spring, etc. In one embodiment, each compressible shim 1402 is made from PORON® 4701-30 material manufactured by Rogers Corporation. As described in further detail below, the rebound characteristics of the compressible shims 1402 push the crown plate 1104 upwardly away from the flange 1112, while the compressibility of the shims 1402 allow the top surface of the crown plate 1104 to be pushed down and held at a desired level such that it is flush with the adjoining top surfaces of the main body 1102 while bonding material in the joint 1202 cures and hardens to permanently hold the crown plate 1104 and main body 1102 together in flush relationship with one another.
In some embodiments, each compressible shim 1402 may be shaped as a dot with a diameter of between about 1.5 millimeters (mm) to about 8 millimeters (mm), preferably about 2.0 mm to about 6 mm, and even more preferably about 2.5 mm to about 4 mm. In some embodiments, each compressible shim may have and a thickness of between about 0.8 mm to about 2.0 mm, preferably about 1.0 mm to about 1.8 mm, even more preferably about 1.2 mm to about 1.6 mm. In alternative embodiments, the compressible shim 1402 may be formed in any of a variety of shapes (e.g., a square, a rectangle, a triangle, a polygon, etc.) with particular lateral and vertical dimensions while remaining within the scope of the present disclosure. It is desirable to achieve an optimum amount of rebound and compressibility provided by the shims 1402 depending on one or more factors such as weight of the crown plate, forces applied to hold down the crown plate in a flush relationship with adjoining surfaces, duration of cure, etc. In some embodiments, any number of shims 1402 may be disposed on the top surface of the flange 1112. In some embodiments, a total of 3 to 20 shims 1402 may be disposed in spaced relationship to one another on the top surface of the flange 1112. Alternatively, the number of the compressible shims 1412 may be determined based on a predefined percentage of an “available area” of the top surface of the flange 1406. As used herein, “available area” refers to an area of the top surface of the flange that is available to be bonded to another component (e.g., a crown plate). For example, if an available area of the top surface of the flange is “A,” an area possessed by the compressible shims (hereinafter “shim area”) may range between 0.5%-50% of A, preferably 0.5%-25% of A, more preferably 0.5%-15% of A, even more preferably 0.5%-10% of A, most preferably 0.5%-5% of A.
Additionally, the number of compressible shims may be accordingly determined based on the size of the compressible shims and the shim area (e.g., 1%-50% of A). In alternative embodiments, a plurality of spaced compressible shims may be replaced by a single continuous compressible gasket 1402 having desired compression and rebound characteristics, as discussed above, and sized to have a total shim area that is within a desired percentage of the available area of the flange 1112. In one embodiment, the total shim area may be 80% or less of the available area. In further embodiments, the total shim area may be 50% or less of the available area.
Typically, the flange 1112 is made from the same metal material (e.g., titanium alloy) as the main body 1102 and, therefore, can add significant mass to the golf club head 1400. In some embodiments, in order to control the mass contribution of the flange 1112 to the golf club head 1400, the width W can be adjusted to achieve a desired mass contribution. In some embodiments, if the flange 1112 adds too much mass to the golf club head 1400, it can take away from the decreased weight benefits of a crown plate 1104 made from a lighter composite material (e.g., carbon fiber or graphite). In some embodiments, the width of the flange 1112 may range from about 3 mm to about 8 mm, preferably from about 4 mm to about 7 mm, and more preferably from about 5.5 mm to about 6.5 mm. In some embodiments, the width of the flange is at least four times as wide as a thickness of the shell. In some embodiments, the thickness of the flange 1112 may range from about 0.4 mm to about 1 mm, preferably from about 0.5 mm to about 0.8 mm, and more preferably from about 0.6 mm to about 0.7 mm. In some embodiments, the depth of the flange 1112 may range from about 0.5 mm to about 1.75 mm, preferably from about 0.7 mm to about 1.2 mm, and more preferably from about 0.8 mm to about 1.1 mm. Although the flange 1112 may extend or run along the entire interface boundary between the crown plate 1104 and the main body 1102, in alternative embodiments, it can extend only partially along the interface boundary.
As further shown in
It is appreciated that since the crown plate 1104 no longer has to be made extra thick to be ground down to be flush with the top surface 1106 of the main body 1102, the mass of the thinner crown plate 1104 is reduced, resulting in a reduction in overall mass of the club head 1400. In some embodiments, the thickness T of the crown plate 104 may range from 0.4 mm to 1.4 mm, preferably between about 0.85 mm and about 1.25 mm, even more preferably between about 0.60 mm and about 0.90 mm, and most preferably between about 0.50 mm and about 0.75 mm.
Next, at step 706, the crown plate 1104 is placed on top of the shim 1402 within the cast opening 1110 of the main body 1102, and the resulting assembly is placed in an adjustable fixture for achieving a flush fit between the crown plate 1104 and main body 1102. In some embodiments, the adjustable fixture includes a plurality (e.g., seven) adjustable screws that apply point load pressure along corresponding predetermined peripheral areas of the crown plate 1104. Each of the adjustable screws are adjusted to compress a corresponding one or more of the compressible shims 1402 to achieve a flush fit between the top surface of the crown plate 1104 and adjacent adjoining top surfaces of the main body 1102. It is appreciated that since the top surface 1204 of the crown plate 1104 and the top surface 1106 of the main body 1102 may be each formed as a curved surface, different amounts of adjustment may be necessary at each adjustment point to achieve a flush surface across the entire joint 1202. Thus, the plurality of shims 1402 disposed over the flange 1112 may be individually tuned (i.e., compressed) to achieve a flush surface across the entire joint 1202.
Next, at step 708, the main body 1102 and crown plate 1104 assembly is removed from the fixture while maintaining the settings of the adjustable screws that achieved the flush fit. At step 710, a bonding material (e.g., Scotch-Weld™ DP 420 epoxy) is applied to mating surfaces of the main body 1102 and crown plate 1104, as described above. Next, at step 712, the assembly is re-inserted and re-clamped within the fixture that was pre-set to achieve a flush fit between the top surface of the crown plate 1104 and adjacent adjoining top surfaces of the main body 1102. While the assembly is clamped within the fixture in the flush-fit setting, at step 714, the bonding material is allowed to cure or dry, thereby permanently affixing the crown plate 1104 to the main body 1102, in the desired flush fit relationship. In one embodiment, the bonding material is allowed to cure at a temperature of 85 degrees Celsius for thirty minutes. After the bonding material is completely cured or dried, at step 716, the assembly is removed from the fixture and any excess bonding material is wiped or ground away, as necessary or desired. Finally, at step 718, the joint interface 1202 between the crown plate 1104 and main body 1102 is painted, as desired.
As described above, in some embodiments, the invention provides a method of manufacturing a golf club head having two or more rigid adjoining structures to easily render the top surfaces of the adjoining structures flush with one another, thereby achieving a cosmetically seamless joint or interface between the adjoining structures. Thus, the method eliminates or substantially reduces grinding away excess material from one or more of the adjoining structures, and/or bonding material, resulting in increased production yield and decreased production time and costs. As used herein, the terms “a”, “an”, and “at least one” encompass one or more of the specified element. That is, if two of a particular element are present, one of these elements is also present and thus “an” element is present. The terms “a plurality of” and “plural” mean two or more of the specified element. As used herein, the term “and/or” used between the last two of a list of elements means any one or more of the listed elements. For example, the phrase “A, B, and/or C” means “A”, “B,”, “C”, “A and B”, “A and C”, “B and C”, or “A, B, and C.
While various exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not by way of limitation. For example, it should be understood that the various features and functionalities described in connection with one or more individual embodiments are not limited in their applicability to the particular embodiment(s) with which they are described, but instead can be applied, alone or in some combination, with one or more other embodiments of the invention described herein, whether or not such combination of features are explicitly described as being a part of a described embodiment. Thus the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
Likewise, the various figures or diagrams depict exemplary configurations of the invention, which are provided to illustrate various features and functionalities that can be provided by various embodiments of the invention. The invention is not restricted to the illustrated example architectures or configurations, but can be implemented using a variety of alternative architectures and configurations. For example, although the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein are directed to a “driver” type of golf club head, principles of the present invention may be applied to any type of golf club head (e.g., fairway woods, hybrid wood-iron, irons, putters) having two or more rigid adjoining surfaces that are intended to be flush with one another, while remaining within the scope of the present disclosure. In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/233,805, filed on Sep. 10, 2016, which claims the benefit of continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/087,002, filed on Mar. 31, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/205,601, filed on Aug. 14, 2015, both of which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4895371 | Bushner | Jan 1990 | A |
| 6364789 | Kosmatka | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6525157 | Cozewith et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6672975 | Galloway | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6773360 | Willett et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6800038 | Willett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6824475 | Burnett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6878078 | Swanson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6945876 | Nakahara | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6955612 | Lu | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6964617 | Williams | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6997820 | Willett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7094159 | Takeda | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7140974 | Chao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7166040 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166041 | Evans | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7186190 | Beach et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7214142 | Meyer | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7223180 | Willett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7226366 | Galloway | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7297072 | Meyer | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7367900 | Kumamoto | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7407447 | Beach et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7410425 | Willett et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7410426 | Willett et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7419441 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7448963 | Beach et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7452285 | Chao et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7530903 | Imamoto | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7530904 | Beach et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7540811 | Beach et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7553242 | Meyer | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7568985 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7572193 | Yokota | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7578753 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7591738 | Beach et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7611424 | Nagai | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7621823 | Beach et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7628707 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7628712 | Chao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632194 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7691008 | Oyama | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7713142 | Hoffman et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7717804 | Beach et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7717805 | Beach et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7731603 | Beach | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7744484 | Chao et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7775905 | Beach et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7806782 | Stites | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7846041 | Beach et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7850544 | Meyer | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7874936 | Chao et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874937 | Chao et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874938 | Chao et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7963861 | Beach et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| RE42544 | Chao et al. | Jul 2011 | E |
| 7985146 | Lin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7993216 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8025587 | Beach et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8096897 | Beach et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8147354 | Hartwell | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8235831 | Beach et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8303431 | Beach et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8337319 | Sargent et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8353786 | Beach et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8444505 | Beach et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8628434 | Chao et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8721472 | Kuan | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8734271 | Beach et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8870678 | Beach et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8888607 | Harbert et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8894506 | Myers | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 9033821 | Beach et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9174096 | Sargent et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9238162 | Breier | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9259625 | Sargent et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9278262 | Sargent et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9387376 | Hall | Jul 2016 | B1 |
| 9440126 | Boyd | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9504889 | Mitzel | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9561413 | Nielson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9597563 | Voshall | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9636556 | Beck | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9682298 | Kingston | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9724577 | Kingston | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9914027 | Harbert | Mar 2018 | B1 |
| 20050020379 | Kumamoto | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266933 | Galloway | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060122004 | Chen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287129 | Billings | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293118 | Meyer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20080149267 | Chao | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261715 | Carter | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090163289 | Chao | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100075773 | Casati, Jr. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20110152000 | Sargent et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110312437 | Sargent et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120071264 | Beach et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122601 | Beach et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129621 | Boyd | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258818 | Beach et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130123040 | Willett et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130137533 | Franklin | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20140080628 | Sargent | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20150297961 | Voshall | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150306473 | Breier | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160001146 | Sargent et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160008687 | Sargent et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160136490 | Sargent et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160271464 | Murphy | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287954 | Sargent et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170072277 | Mata et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170087429 | Nielson et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62205601 | Aug 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15233805 | Aug 2016 | US |
| Child | 15849477 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15087002 | Mar 2016 | US |
| Child | 15233805 | US |
