The present application is based on Japanese Priority Document P2021-200497 filed on Dec. 10, 2021. The entire disclosure of the above application is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
The present disclosure relates to a golf club head.
Regardless of the skill level, increasing the flight distance is an endless challenge for golfers. In particular, differently from the other golf clubs, the improvement in the flight distance performance of the drivers always continues to be expected.
Various factors are involved in the improvement of the flight distance performance. One of the typical factors is the restitution performance of a golf club head. The restitution performance is closely related to the flight distance performance. In order to achieve a higher flight distance performance, attempts have been made so far to enhance the coefficient of restitution of a face that hits a ball.
Often employed for enhancing the coefficient of restitution of a face is a technique that reduces the thickness of the peripheral portion of a face (e.g., see paragraphs [0004], [0009], etc. of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 10-155943 (hereinafter referred to as “Okada et al.”)). The trampoline effect occurs on the face by reducing the thickness of the peripheral portion of the face so that the coefficient of restitution to a ball is enhanced.
On the other hand, since the strength is reduced in the thinned region provided to the face, it is not possible to reduce the thickness without limit. Therefore, in view of distributing the stress that is locally applied, attempts have been made to uniformly reduce the thickness of the entire face or to make the face partially thin. However, in terms of reducing the strength of the face, there is no difference from the technique of reducing the thickness of the face described in Okada et al.
Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2005-137940 (hereinafter referred to as “Nakahara et al.”) introduces a configuration example to enhance the coefficient of restitution without changing the thickness of a face. This is a technique to use fiber reinforced plastic or the like in at least two of a crown, a heel, a sole, and a toe of a golf club head. More specifically, a cut-out portion is provided in each of regions of the crown and the sole along the edges of the face or in each of regions of the heel and the toe along the edges of the face, and these cut-out portions are each closed by a closing member made of the fiber reinforced plastic or the like (see paragraph [0018] of Nakahara et al.). For the former regions, see paragraphs [0016] and [0017] in the specification and FIG. 1 (a) to (c) of Nakahara et al. For the latter regions, see paragraph [0022] in the specification and FIG. 3 (a) and (b) of Nakahara et al.
Nakahara et al. describes that “the flexural rigidity in the portion provided with the fiber reinforced plastic or the like can be made lower than the flexural rigidity in the face and this makes it possible to increase the deformation of the face upon impact of a golf ball so that it is possible to enhance the coefficient of restitution to the golf ball launched and thus to increase the flight distance of the golf ball” (see paragraph [0009] of Nakahara et al.).
When the structure described in Nakahara et al. is put into practice, since the cut-out portion is a hole passing through a thick wall portion of the golf club head, it is necessary to completely close the cut-out portion with the closing member made of the fiber reinforced plastic or the like. Further, due to the need to hide the presence of the closing member from the outside, the closing member should be joined to the outer surface of the golf club head without a level difference or a seam and finished with painting. The manufacture is complicated.
In addition, the durability is also required so that even when a shock upon hitting a ball is transmitted, no cracks occur in the painting between the golf club head and the closing member, and therefore, the degree of difficulty of the manufacture becomes high.
For a golf club head that is able to enhance the coefficient of restitution with durability, it is a task to facilitate the manufacture.
One aspect of a golf club head includes a head shell made of metal, a face provided to the head shell, a sole provided to the head shell so as to be continuous with the face through a leading edge, a concave slot provided to the sole along the leading edge and configured to bend in a target direction upon hitting a ball with the face, and a reinforcing member made of fiber reinforced plastic and bonded in the slot, the reinforcing member configured to apply a resistance to bending of the slot.
An embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. This embodiment is an example of application to a golf club head 11 (hereinafter may also be referred to simply as a “club head 11”) having a hollow structure and made of metal. A description will be given along the items listed below.
(1) Basic Structure
As illustrated in
A material of the head shell 21 can be selected from various metals. Among them, it is preferable to use a titanium alloy, an aluminum alloy, a magnesium alloy, or the like with a high specific strength.
A crown 51 that is seen in front as viewed from the player holding a golf club is provided with a crown member 71 (see
As illustrated in
In
In
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The head shell 21 has a leading edge 55 in a region between the face 31 and the sole 52 (see
A shaft hole 58 for inserting the shaft (not illustrated) passes through the first boss 56. The shaft hole 58 passes through to the sole 52 so as to support the shaft attaching/detaching work from the sole 52 side.
The second boss 57 is provided with a bolt hole (not illustrated) exposed to the sole 52. A toe weight 92 to be attached to the toe 54 side is fixedly screwed into this bolt hole.
(2) Slot and Reinforcing Member
The club head 11 of this embodiment has a concave slot 81 provided to the sole 52, and a reinforcing member 82 is fixed to the slot 81 by an adhesive.
The slot 81 is provided along the leading edge 55 (see
The sole 52 of the head shell 21 is formed with a recess 59 along the leading edge 55. The recess 59 provides a passing-through region A for the shaft hole 58 on the heel 53 side and provides an attaching region B for attaching the toe weight 92 on the toe 54 side. The slot 81 is disposed in a disposition region C connecting the passing-through region A on the heel 53 side and the attaching region B on the toe 54 side. The disposition region C is formed shallower than the passing-through region A and the attaching region B and formed wider than the passing-through region A and the attaching region B in the target direction TD (see
The reinforcing member 82 is a plate-like member with its middle portion fitted to the slot 81 and with its both side portions fitted to the recess 59 and has a shape elongated in the direction connecting the heel 53 and the toe 54 (see
The slot 81 is formed thinner than the other portions of the head shell 21. The thickness of the slot 81 is, for example, 0.8 mm to 1.3 mm.
The thickness of the reinforcing member 82 is determined by its ratio to the groove width (the groove width in the target direction TD) of the slot 81. As a specific numerical value, the thickness of the reinforcing member 82 is set to about 10% to 20% of the groove width of the slot 81. For example, assuming that the groove width of the slot 81 is 7 mm to 8 mm, the thickness of the reinforcing member 82 is determined to be about 0.8 mm to 1.5 mm.
2. Actions
The golf club head of this embodiment acts as follows.
(1) Improvement in Restitution Performance
The club head 11 of this embodiment improves the restitution performance to a golf ball and contributes to an increase in flight distance.
The improvement in restitution performance is obtained by providing the slot 81. Upon hitting the ball with the face 31, the slot 81 bends in the target direction TD to generate the trampoline effect on the face 31, thereby contributing to enhancing the restitution performance.
The spring action of the reinforcing member 82 also contributes to the improvement in restitution performance. When the slot 81 bends in the target direction TD, the reinforcing member 82 also bends in the target direction TD, and the spring action occurs by its restoring force. This spring action helps to improve the restitution performance. The spring action of the reinforcing member 82 described above occurs effectively by setting the thickness of the reinforcing member 82 to about 10% to 20% of the groove width (the groove width in the target direction TD) of the slot 81.
(2) Compliance with SLE Rule
With respect to the coefficient of restitution (COR) of a golf club head, the SLE rule is regulated by the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of Saint Andrews (R & A) and the United States Golf Association (USGA). The COR is required to be within 0.830 obtained by adding a tolerance of 0.008 to 0.822.
On the other hand, in order to perform a COR test, it is necessary to use a designated ball and to measure the ratio of speeds of the ball before and after impact with a club head so that high accuracy is required at the time of the test. It takes time and effort to precisely measure all, and further, there is no 100% reproducibility. In view of this, a CT test was created. For a characteristic time (CT) value, it is possible to easily and accurately obtain a measured value based on a grounding time when a pendulum is dropped on a face. The limit of the CT value is 239 μs. Products within 257 μs obtained by adding a tolerance of 18 μs to 239 μs are determined to be the SLE rule compliant products.
In the product development, it is orthodox to establish a structure that increases the initial speed considered to be equated with the COR, and to employ a process to perform an adjustment while increasing the CT value as finishing. When applied to this embodiment, although roughly, the thinning by providing the slot 81 to the sole 52 corresponds to the establishment of the structure that increases the initial speed, and the thinning and the thickness adjustment of the slot 81 correspond to the process to perform the adjustment while increasing the CT value. In this event, as the thickness of the slot 81 decreases, the trampoline effect increases so that the initial speed and the CT value also increase.
Naturally, when the thickness of the slot 81 is made too thin, the strength is reduced, leading to damage. The lower limit value of the thickness that does not lead to damage is 0.8 mm. This is the critical significance of 0.8 mm.
On the other hand, when the thickness of the slot 81 exceeds 1.3 mm, the increasing action of the initial speed is weakened. The thickness of the slot 81 is desirably 1.3 mm or less. This is the critical significance of 1.3 mm.
However, if it is questioned whether the thickness of the slot 81 is always desired to be 0.8 mm, it cannot be said so. This is because there are cases where the CT value exceeds the upper limit target of 239 μs.
In this regard, according to this embodiment, while the thinning of the slot 81 acts in the direction to increase the initial speed (COR) and the CT value, the reinforcing member 82 acts in the direction to suppress the increase in CT value and does not largely affect the COR. That is, the configuration of bonding the reinforcing member 82 to the slot 81 makes it possible to increase the initial speed (COR) while suppressing the increase in CT value so as to make the CT value compliant with the SLE rule.
More specifically, the initial speed (COR) increases and the CT value also increases by thinning the slot 81. In this event, since the reinforcing member 82 suppresses the increase in CT value, further thinning of the slot 81 is made possible compared to the case where the reinforcing member 82 is not provided. Correspondingly, the initial speed can also be increased. A concern here may be whether the COR exceeds the target value of 0.822. However, there is no such a possibility. This is because while the COR also increases by the thinning of the slot 81, its increasing rate is not so high as that of the CT value.
As described above, with the club head 11 of this embodiment, it is possible to improve the initial speed performance while suppressing the increase in CT value so as to make the CT value compliant with the SLE rule, thereby achieving a further increase in flight distance.
(3) Improvement in Strength of Slot
The strength of the slot 81 can be reinforced by bonding the reinforcing member 82 made of the fiber reinforced plastic. As a result, it is possible to maintain the durability even when the slot 81 is thinned.
The improvement in the strength of the slot 81 can also be realized by forming the slot 81 in a cross-sectional shape forming a parabola, i.e., in a curved surface shape with no corners. This is because since a crack occurs in the slot 81 from a corner portion, it is possible to make a crack less prone to occur by eliminating the corner.
(4) Shock Damping Action
It is possible to obtain a shock damping action by bonding the reinforcing member 82 made of the fiber reinforced plastic in the slot 81. Consequently, the load to the face 31 upon hitting a ball is reduced, and therefore, the reduction in the thickness of the face 31 is made possible also from this aspect.
Further, the shock damping action by the reinforcing member 82 also generates an effect to stabilize the behavior of the club head 11. This is because when the hitting point deviates from the sweet spot on the face 31, the behavior of the club head 11 becomes unstable, but with the shock damping action, the degree of unstableness is relaxed. As a result, it is possible to stabilize the launch performance (launch angle, spin rate) of the ball.
(5) Club Performance Adjustment Function
By changing the thickness of the reinforcing member 82 in the range where the spring action occurs, the bending amount of the slot 81 changes so that it is possible to adjust the club performance. By adjusting the club performance to match the head speed of an individual player, it is possible to adjust the launch performance (launch angle, spin rate) to match a player with a specific head speed so that it is possible to provide a range of club selection optimal to an individual person.
(6) Fixing Strength of Reinforcing Member
The reinforcing member 82 is bonded and fixed in such a way as to extend even to the recess 59. This makes it possible to increase the fixing strength of the reinforcing member 82.
3. Modifications
When implementing the embodiment described above, various changes or modifications can be made.
For example, in the above-described embodiment, the configuration example in which the slot 81 is provided in the recess 59 is given by way of example, but the recess 59 is not necessarily required. The slot 81 may be provided directly on the surface of the sole 52.
Regardless of whether or not the recess 59 is provided, it is satisfactory for the reinforcing member 82 to be bonded in the slot 81, and therefore, the both side portions 84 are not necessarily essential.
The above-described numerical values of the thicknesses of the slot 81 and the reinforcing member 82, and so on are by way of example only, and these numerical value ranges do not constitute any limitation.
Besides, any changes or modifications are allowed.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2021-200497 | Dec 2021 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6102813 | Dill | Aug 2000 | A |
7435190 | Sugimoto | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7470201 | Nakahara et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7582024 | Shear | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8870679 | Oldknow | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9216324 | Shear | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9403070 | Stokke | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9925428 | Akiyama | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10343032 | Martens | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10343033 | Frame | Jul 2019 | B2 |
11266886 | Stokke | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20050026721 | Imamoto et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050119070 | Kumamoto | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060052177 | Nakahara | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058114 | Evans | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070049416 | Shear | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049417 | Shear | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080293512 | Chen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090042667 | Lin | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100041490 | Boyd | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041494 | Boyd | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120196701 | Stites | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130178306 | Beno | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140080624 | Galvan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140080634 | Golden | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150094163 | Motokawa | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150174461 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160158609 | Takagi | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160346632 | Akiyama | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170014690 | Morin | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100528268 | Aug 2009 | CN |
102007059339 | Jan 2009 | DE |
H10-155943 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2005-137940 | Jun 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Reasons for Rejection issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-200497 dated Feb. 22, 2023, with English translation (14 Pages). |
Extended European Search Report for corresponding Application No. 22181801.6 dated Dec. 7, 2022 (9 Pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230181977 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |