The present disclosure relates to a golf club head having one or more components comprising a thermoplastic composite material.
In an ideal club design, the amount of structural mass would be minimized (without sacrificing resiliency) to provide additional discretionary mass that can be strategically positioned to customize club performance. In general, the total of all club head mass is the sum of the structural mass and the discretionary mass. Structural mass generally refers to the mass of the materials that are required to provide the club head with the structural resilience needed to withstand repeated impacts. Structural mass is highly design-dependent, and provides little design control over specific mass distribution. Conversely, discretionary mass is any additional mass (beyond the minimum structural requirements) that may be added to the club head design for the sole purpose of customizing the performance and/or forgiveness of the club. Current golf club heads comprise metallic materials for at least a portion of the structural mass of the club head (for example, in the strike face and/or at least a portion of the rear body). There is a need in the art for alternative designs to golf club heads having structural mass comprising metal, to provide a means for maximizing discretionary weight to maximize club head moment of inertia (MOI) and lower/back center of gravity (CG).
While this provided background description attempts to clearly explain certain club-related terminology, it is meant to be illustrative and not limiting. Custom within the industry, rules set by golf organizations such as the United States Golf Association (USGA) or The R&A, and naming convention may augment this description of terminology without departing from the scope of the present application.
The present disclosure generally relates to embodiments of a golf club head having one or more injection molded thermoplastic composite materials incorporated into the club head face and/or body to form a structural aspect of the club head. In doing so, the present designs effect a reduction in structural mass of the head when compared to an all-metal club head of a similar size, shape, and outward appearance. The additional discretionary mass that these designs provide is then available to a club head designer to be strategically placed around the head, for example, to increase the moment of inertia of the club head and/or to alter the relative location of the club head's center of gravity.
Since thermoplastic polymers have considerably lower strengths than most metals used in golf clubs, special attention must be paid to the design, material selection, and reinforcement within polymeric portions to avoid unexpected failure while still maintaining a dynamic response, sound, and feel that is expected by the golfer.
Embodiments discussed below further recognize that filled polymers can have anisotropic structural qualities, which are dependent on the typical or average orientation of the embedded, discontinuous fibers. More specifically, a filled polymeric component will generally have greater strength to loads aligned with the longitudinal axis of the embedded fibers, and comparatively less strength to loads applied laterally. Because fiber orientation within a filled polymer is highly dependent on mold flow during the initial part formation, embodiments described below utilize mold and part designs that aid in orienting the embedded fiber along the most likely force/stress propagation paths.
“A,” “an,” “the,” “at least one,” and “one or more” are used interchangeably to indicate that at least one of the item is present; a plurality of such items may be present unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. All numerical values of parameters (e.g., of quantities or conditions) in this specification, including the appended claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about” whether or not “about” actually appears before the numerical value. “About” indicates that the stated numerical value allows some slight imprecision (with some approach to exactness in the value; about or reasonably close to the value; nearly). If the imprecision provided by “about” is not otherwise understood in the art with this ordinary meaning, then “about” as used herein indicates at least variations that may arise from ordinary methods of measuring and using such parameters. In addition, disclosure of ranges includes disclosure of all values and further divided ranges within the entire range. Each value within a range and the endpoints of a range are hereby all disclosed as separate embodiment. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated items, but do not preclude the presence of other items. As used in this specification, the term “or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the listed items. When the terms first, second, third, etc. are used to differentiate various items from each other, these designations are merely for convenience and do not limit the items.
The terms “loft” or “loft angle” of a golf club, as described herein, refers to the angle formed between the club face and the shaft, as measured by any suitable loft and lie machine.
The terms “first,” “second,” “third,” “fourth,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments described herein are, for example, capable of operation in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms “include,” and “have,” and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to those elements, but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, system, article, device, or apparatus.
The terms “left,” “right,” “front,” “back,” “top,” “bottom,” “over,” “under,” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes with general reference to a golf club held at address on a horizontal ground plane and at predefined loft and lie angles, though are not necessarily intended to describe permanent relative positions. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the apparatus, methods, and/or articles of manufacture described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein.
The terms “couple,” “coupled,” “couples,” “coupling,” and the like should be broadly understood and refer to connecting two or more elements, mechanically or otherwise. Coupling (whether mechanical or otherwise) may be for any length of time, e.g., permanent or semi-permanent or only for an instant.
Other features and aspects will become apparent by consideration of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. Before any embodiments of the disclosure are explained in detail, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details or construction and the arrangement of components as set forth in the following description or as illustrated in the drawings. The disclosure is capable of supporting other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. It should be understood that the description of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the disclosure from covering all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
General Club Head Structure
Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to identify like or identical components in the various views,
The front body 12 generally includes a strike face 30 that has a forward ball-striking surface 32, which is intended to impact a golf ball during a conventional swing. In some embodiments, the front body 12 may also include a frame 34 that surrounds and extends rearward from a perimeter 36 of the strike face 30 to provide the front body 12 with a cup-shaped appearance, and may further include a hosel 38 for receiving a golf club shaft or shaft adapter.
In a playable, completed club head 10, the front body 12 and the rear body 14 are integrally coupled at a joint 40, such as through one or more adhering, bonding, mechanical affixing, welding, or fusing operations. In one particular configuration, such as shown in
The bonded interface 46 may be formed when a bond surface 50 of the front body 12 (front bond surface 50) abuts and is secured to a mating bond surface 52 of the rear body 14 (rear bond surface 52). In the embodiment shown, the front bond surface 50 surrounds and is radially exterior to the rear bond surface 50, with both surfaces 50, 52 being flush with each other and extending in a generally front/back direction. The front bond surface 50 may be coupled to the rear bond surface 52 through any of the means listed above, however, in a particular embodiment, the two surfaces may each comprise and/or may be formed from a common thermoplastic polymer that may facilitate a material bond or weld to the adjoining surface. Structurally, because the interface between the front and rear bond surfaces 50, 52 is generally parallel to the direction of insertion/extraction of the front body 12 onto the rear body 14, the bond/coupling between surfaces more effectively resist extraction of the front body 12 via sheer engagement of the interface. Specifically, the sheer bond tends to distribute stresses more effectively across the entire bond surface, rather than inducing non-uniform stresses due to, for example, cantilevering.
The mechanical interface may be formed when the rear-most surface 54 of the front body 12 (i.e., the rear end of the frame 34) contacts a mating surface 56 of the rear body 14 that is in line with the outer wall 58 or other structure of the rear body 14. This alignment allows impact loads to be directly transferred from the frame 34 to the rear body 14 and the transition surface 58 via direct contact between the materials, and is not as reliant on the strength of the bond or intermediate adhesive.
In some embodiments, the rear body 14 can further include one or more metallic weight structures to aid in positioning the club head center of gravity low and back. In the embodiment provided in
In some embodiments, the weight structure 60 and/or weight can comprise a mass between 50 grams and 80 grams. Further, the weight structure 60 and/or weight can comprise a metallic material including but not limited to steel, tungsten, aluminum, titanium, bronze, brass, copper, gold, platinum, lead, silver, or zinc. Further, in these embodiments, the weight structure 60 and/or weight can comprise a specific gravity between 2.5 and 18.
As further illustrated in
Polymeric Face Constructions
One suitable thermoplastic resin may include a thermoplastic polyamide (e.g., PA6 or PA66), and it may be filled with chopped carbon fiber (i.e., a carbon-filled polyamide). Other resins may include certain polyimides, polyamide-imides, polyphenylene sulfides (PPS), polyetheretherketones (PEEK), polycarbonates, engineering polyurethanes, and/or other similar materials.
While the use of polymer composites within a club head 10 can result in an overall (structural) weight savings, their use in high stress areas of the club head 10 is complicated by their comparatively lower strength than typical metals and their highly anisotropic nature. This anisotropic nature is demonstrated by a considerably greater tensile strength of the composite when measured along an average longitudinal fiber direction than when measured perpendicular to this average fiber direction. These differences are more evident as the embedded fibers become more uniformly oriented. Depending on the design and materials chosen, certain composites may possess sufficient strength to withstand repeated ball strikes only if the embedded fibers are properly oriented.
One attribute of injection molded fiber-filled polymers is that fiber orientation tends to follow the flow of polymer/flow front within the mold during creation.
Because the strike face 30, frame 34, and hosel 38 are generally the highest-stress portions of the club head 10, particular attention must be paid to the design if attempting to use filled polymer composites in the front body 12. Poorly oriented fiber content may result in a strike face 30 that lacks sufficient structure to withstand repeated impact forces. During an impact, stresses tend to radiate outward from the impact location while propagating toward the rear of the club head 10. Additionally, bending moments are imparted about the shaft, which induces material stresses between the impact location and the hosel 38, and along the hosel 38/parallel to a hosel axis 90. Therefore, in an ideal design, it is preferable for the embedded fibers to generally follow these same directions; namely: within the hosel 38 parallel to the hosel axis 90; across at least the center of the face 30 (represented by the horizontal face axis 92); and, generally outward from the face center with the fibers turning largely rearward within the frame 34 (i.e., parallel to a fore-rear axis 94).
Because the discontinuous fibers are mixed within the flowable polymer prior to forming the part, it is impossible to guarantee perfect alignment. With that said, however, the design of the front body 12 and manner of injection molding (e.g., fill rate, gating/venting, and temperature) may be controlled to align as many of the embedded fibers with these axes as possible. For example, within the hosel, it is preferable if greater than about 50% of the fibers are aligned within 30 degrees of the hosel axis 90. Between the center of the face and the hosel 38, it is preferable if greater than about 50% of the fibers are aligned within 30 degrees of the horizontal face axis 92, and within the frame 34, it is preferable if greater than about 50% of the fibers are aligned within 30 degrees of the fore-rear axis 94. In another embodiment, greater than about 60% of the fibers within the hosel 38 are aligned within 25 degrees of the hosel axis 90, greater than about 60% of the fibers between the center of the face and the hosel 38 are aligned within 25 degrees of the horizontal face axis 92, and greater than about 60% of the fibers within the frame 34 are aligned within 25 degrees of the fore-rear axis 94. In still another embodiment, greater than about 70% of the fibers within the hosel 38 are aligned within 20 degrees of the hosel axis 90, greater than about 70% of the fibers between the center of the face and the hosel 38 are aligned within 20 degrees of the horizontal face axis 92, and greater than about 70% of the fibers within the frame 34 are aligned within 20 degrees of the fore-rear axis 94.
To encourage the polymer to fill the hosel 38 from bottom to top, it may be desirable to fill the face from a location near the toe 26 and that is at or preferably above the horizontal centerline 104 of the face 30 (i.e., between the crown 20 and a line drawn through the center of the face 106 and parallel to a ground plane when the club is held at address). This may encourage the flow 108 and corresponding fiber alignment to follow a generally downward slant from above the horizontal centerline 104 at the toe 26 toward the center of the face 106 while between the toe and the center 106. Following this, at the center 106, the flow 110 and corresponding fiber alignment may generally be parallel to the horizontal centerline 104 at or immediately surrounding the center of the face 106. Finally, the flow 112 may arc upward and fill the hosel 38 largely from the bottom toward the neck. The general directional references illustrated at 108, 110, and 112 are generally intended to indicate that greater than about 50% of the fibers within the polymer are aligned within about 30 degrees of the indicated direction, or more preferably that more than about 60% of the fibers are aligned within about 25 degrees of the indicated direction, or even more preferably that more than about 70% of the fibers are aligned within about 20 degrees of the indicated direction.
As shown in
As further shown in
As noted above,
In many embodiments, the face thickness may vary such that the minimum face thickness ranges from 0.114 inch and 0.179 inch, and the maximum face thickness ranges from 0.160 inch to 0.301 inch. The minimum face thicknesses can be 0.110 inches, 0.114 inches, 0.115 inches, 0.120 inches, 0.125 inches, 0.130 inches, 0.135 inches, 0.140 inches, 0.145 inches, 0.150 inches, 0.155 inches, 0.160 inches, 0.165 inches, 0.170 inches, 0.175 inches, 0.179 inches, or 0.180 inches. The maximum face thickness can be 0.160 inches, 0.165 inches, 0.170 inches, 0.175 inches, 0.180 inches, 0.185 inches, 0.190 inches, 0.195 inches, 0.200 inches, 0.205 inches, 0.210 inches, 0.215 inches, 0.220 inches, 0.225 inches, 0.230 inches, 0.235 inches, 0.240 inches, 0.245 inches, 0.250 inches, 0.255 inches, 0.260 inches, 0.265 inches, 0.270 inches, 0.275 inches, 0.280 inches, 0.285 inches, 0.290 inches, 0.300 inches, 0.301 inches, 0.305 inches, or 0.310 inches.
The reinforcing elements 202 may comprise a plurality of continuous fibers, wires, or other elongate elements that extend across a substantial portion of the face (i.e., more than about 25 mm, or more than about 30 mm, or more than about 35 mm, or more than about 40 mm). In some embodiments, these elements 202 may include a first plurality of elements 204 that extend generally parallel to each other in a first spaced arrangement. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the reinforcing elements 202 may include a second plurality of elements 206 that extend generally parallel to each other in a second spaced arrangement, where the first and second plurality of elements 204, 206 are not parallel. As shown in
To ensure that the reinforcing elements 202 are adequately embedded within the composite and that they do not simply create a weakened internal boundary plane, it may be necessary to ensure a minimum spacing between adjacent elements. For example, as generally illustrated in the cross-sectional view provided in
The continuous reinforcing elements 202 may be formed from any high strength material including carbon fiber, glass fiber, aramid fiber, or the like. In some embodiments, however, the reinforcing elements 202 may be formed from metal, with each reinforcing element being a wire or plurality of bundled wires. In one configuration, the metal may be a metal that is traditionally used to form golf club faces such as, for example, a stainless steel or steel alloy (e.g., C300, C350, Ni (Nickel)-Co (Cobalt)-Cr (Chromium)-Steel Alloy, 565 Steel, AISI type 304 or AISI type 630 stainless steel), a titanium alloy (e.g., a Ti-6-4, Ti-3-8-6-4-4, Ti-10-2-3, Ti 15-3-3-3, Ti 15-5-3, Ti185, Ti 6-6-2, Ti-7s, Ti-92, or Ti-8-1-1 Titanium alloy), or other similar materials.
In one configuration, such as shown in
Thermoplastic Composite Materials
As mentioned above, the molded front body 12 may be formed from a thermoplastic composite material that comprises a thermoplastic polymer matrix material and a filler. Exemplary thermoplastic polymer matrix materials include polycarbonate (PC), polyester (PBT), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polyamide (PA) (e.g. polyamide 6 (PA6), polyamide 6-6 (PA66), polyamide-12 (PA12), polyamide-612 (PA612), polyamide 11 (PA11)), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), polyphthalamide (PPA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polyethylene (PE), polyphenylene ether/oxide (PPE), polyoxymethylene (POM), polypropylene (PP), styrene acrylonitrile (SAN), polymethylpentene (PMP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA), polyetherimide (PEI), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyether ketone (PEK), polyetherimide (PEI), polyethersulfone (PES), polyphenylene oxide (PPO), polystyrene (PS), polysulfone (PSU), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), liquid crystal polymer (LCP), thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), or alloys of the above described thermoplastic materials, such as an alloy of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC) or an alloy of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polyamide (PA).
For example, in some embodiments, the thermoplastic composite material can include thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) as the thermoplastic polymer matrix material. TPU comprises a chemical structure consisting of linear segmented block copolymers having hard and soft segments. In some embodiments, the hard segments comprise aromatic or aliphatic structures, and the soft segments comprise polyether or polyester chains. In other embodiments, the thermoplastic polymer matrix material comprising TPU can have a hard and soft segments with different chemical structures.
For further example, in some embodiments, the thermoplastic composite material can include polyamine 6-6 (PA66) or polyamide 6 (PA6) as the thermoplastic polymer matrix material.
The fillers of the thermoplastic composite material can include fibers, beads, or other structures comprising various materials (described below) that are mixed with the thermoplastic polymer. The fillers can provide structural reinforcement, weighting, lightening, or various other characteristics to the thermoplastic composite material. In many embodiments, the fillers can comprise carbon or glass. However, in other embodiments, the fillers can comprise other suitable materials. For example, the fillers of one or more lamina layer can comprise aramid fibers (e.g. Nomex, Vectran, Kevlar, Twaron), bamboo fibers, natural fibers (e.g. cotton, hemp, flax), metal fibers (e.g. titanium, aluminum), glass beads, tungsten beads, or ceramic fibers (e.g. titanium dioxide, granite, silicon carbide).
The fillers or fibers can be short (less than approximately 0.5 mm in length or diameter), long (ranging in length or diameter between approximately 0.5 mm to approximately 40 mm, or more preferably between approximately 5 mm and approximately 12 mm), or continuous (greater than approximately 40 mm in length). In many embodiments, the front body 12 and the rear body 14 comprise short and/or long fibers. In other embodiments, the front body 12 and the rear body 14 can comprise continuous fibers instead of, or in addition to the short and long fibers.
In many embodiments, the thermoplastic composite material can comprise 30-40% fillers by volume. In other embodiments, the thermoplastic composite material can comprise up to 55%, up to 60%, up to 65%, or up to 70% fillers by volume.
In many embodiments, the thermoplastic composite comprises a specific gravity of approximately 1.0-2.0, which is significantly lower than the specific gravity of metallic materials used in golf (e.g. the specific gravity of titanium is approximately 4.5 and the specific gravity of aluminum is approximately 3.5). Further, in many embodiments, the thermoplastic composite material comprises a strength to weight ratio or specific strength greater than 1,000,000 PSI/(lb/in3), and a strength to modulus ratio or specific flexibility greater than 0.009. The specific gravity, specific strength, and specific flexibility of the thermoplastic composite material enable significant weight savings in the club head 10, while maintaining durability.
Methods of Forming Golf Club Heads Having Thermoplastic Composite Materials
In the illustrated embodiment of
As discussed above, the front body 12 may be formed, for example, using an injection molding process. In such a process, a flowable thermoplastic polymer is injected into a cavity of a mold, where the cavity is the negative of the part to-be-formed. Prior to injecting the flowable polymer, a plurality of discontinuous fibers are mixed into the polymer such that they are generally dispersed in a consistent manner. The flowable polymer is then injected into the mold, where it fills the cavity and solidifies.
In an embodiment such as shown in
In some embodiments, the rear body 14 may be formed from one or more thermoplastic composite materials to facilitate the fusion bond with the front body 12 (i.e., via the joint 40 described above). In one configuration, the rear body 14 may be constructed from injection molded and compression molded thermoplastic composites, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,925,432, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. By incorporating a common, or otherwise miscible thermoplastic polymer in both the rear body 14 and front body 12, the fusion joint may be made feasible and more robust.
Advantages of Club Heads Comprising Thermoplastic Composite Materials
The thermoplastic composite material enables heating and reforming (due to the thermoplastic matrix material). Accordingly, an entire hollow body club head can be molded in pieces and then fused together without the need for intermediate adhesives. This is generally contrary to many current club heads that have structural metal frames and composite panel inserts (comprising thermoset matrices, which cannot be reformed upon heating).
Further, the thermoplastic composite material reduces the structural mass of the club head beyond what is possible with traditional metal and composite forming techniques used in golf club heads. The structural weight savings accomplished through this design may be used to either reduce the entire weight of the club head 10 (which may provide faster club head speeds and/or longer hitting distances) or to increase the amount of discretionary mass that is available for placement on the club head (i.e., for a constant club head weight). In a preferred embodiment, the additional discretionary mass is incorporated in the final club head design via one or more metallic weights 60 that are coupled with the sole 22 and/or rear-most portion of the club head 10.
The thermoplastic composite material provides the structural integrity necessary to withstand impact forces, while saving weight as described above. In many embodiments, the fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite can comprise a strength to weight ratio and a strength to modulus ratio (as described above) greater than ratios achievable with metallic materials.
According to one example, a golf club head has a strike face 30 comprising a thermoplastic composite material. The thermoplastic composite material comprises TPU as a thermoplastic polymer matrix material, with 40% fill of long carbon fibers. The strike face 30 comprises a thickness of 0.265 inch, resulting in an average coefficient of restitution (COR) between 0.821 and 0.826. As a comparative, a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy resulted in a coefficient of restitution of approximately 0.828. Accordingly, the coefficient of restitution of the exemplary strike face 30 comprising TPU with 40% fill of long carbon fibers, and having a thickness of 0.265 inch, maintained a similar coefficient of restitution (within 0.85%) compared to a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy. Further, the exemplary strike face 30 maintained durability during testing. The results described herein were obtained by testing COR plates per USGA methods.
According to another example, a golf club head has a strike face 30 comprising a thermoplastic composite material. The thermoplastic composite material comprises TPU as a thermoplastic polymer matrix material, with 50% fill of long carbon fibers. The strike face 30 comprises a thickness of 0.265 inch, resulting in an average coefficient of restitution (COR) of 0.815. As a comparative, a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy resulted in a coefficient of restitution of approximately 0.828. Accordingly, the coefficient of restitution of the exemplary strike face 30 comprising TPU with 50% fill of long carbon fibers, and having a thickness of 0.265 inch, maintained a similar coefficient of restitution (within 1.6%) compared to a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy. Further, the exemplary strike face 30 maintained durability during testing. The results described herein were obtained by testing COR plates per USGA methods.
According to one example, a golf club head has a strike face 30 comprising a thermoplastic composite material. The thermoplastic composite material comprises TPU as a thermoplastic polymer matrix material, with 50% fill of long carbon fibers. The strike face 30 comprises a thickness of 0.275 inch, resulting in an average coefficient of restitution (COR) of 0.814. As a comparative, a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy resulted in a coefficient of restitution of approximately 0.828. Accordingly, the coefficient of restitution of the exemplary strike face 30 comprising TPU with 50% fill of long carbon fibers, and having a thickness of 0.275 inch, maintained a similar coefficient of restitution (within 1.7%) compared to a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy. Further, the exemplary strike face 30 maintained durability during testing. The results described herein were obtained by testing COR plates per USGA methods.
According to one example, a golf club head has a strike face 30 comprising a thermoplastic composite material. The thermoplastic composite material comprises TPU as a thermoplastic polymer matrix material, with 40% fill of long carbon fibers. The strike face 30 comprises a thickness of 0.266 inch, resulting in an average coefficient of restitution (COR) of 0.808. As a comparative, a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy resulted in a coefficient of restitution of approximately 0.828. Accordingly, the coefficient of restitution of the exemplary strike face 30 comprising TPU with 40% fill of long carbon fibers, and having a thickness of 0.266 inch, maintained a similar coefficient of restitution (within 2.4%) compared to a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy. Further, the exemplary strike face 30 maintained durability during testing. The results described herein were obtained by testing COR plates per USGA methods.
According to one example, a golf club head has a strike face 30 comprising a thermoplastic composite material. The thermoplastic composite material comprises TPU as a thermoplastic polymer matrix material, with 50% fill of long carbon fibers. The strike face 30 comprises a thickness of 0.272 inch, resulting in an average coefficient of restitution (COR) of 0.802. As a comparative, a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy resulted in a coefficient of restitution of approximately 0.828. Accordingly, the coefficient of restitution of the exemplary strike face 30 comprising TPU with 50% fill of long carbon fibers, and having a thickness of 0.272 inch, maintained a similar coefficient of restitution (within 3.1%) compared to a similar strike face comprising a titanium alloy. Further, the exemplary strike face 30 maintained durability during testing. The results described herein were obtained by testing COR plates per USGA methods.
Replacement of one or more claimed elements constitutes reconstruction and not repair. Additionally, benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described with regard to specific embodiments. The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element or elements that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced, however, are not to be construed as critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all of the claims.
As the rules to golf may change from time to time (e.g., new regulations may be adopted or old rules may be eliminated or modified by golf standard organizations and/or governing bodies such as the United States Golf Association (USGA), the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews (R&A), etc.), golf equipment related to the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be conforming or non-conforming to the rules of golf at any particular time. Accordingly, golf equipment related to the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be advertised, offered for sale, and/or sold as conforming or non-conforming golf equipment. The apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein are not limited in this regard.
While the above examples may be described in connection with a driver-type golf club, the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be applicable to other types of golf club such as a fairway wood-type golf club, a hybrid-type golf club, an iron-type golf club, a wedge-type golf club, or a putter-type golf club. Alternatively, the apparatus, methods, and articles of manufacture described herein may be applicable other type of sports equipment such as a hockey stick, a tennis racket, a fishing pole, a ski pole, etc.
Moreover, embodiments and limitations disclosed herein are not dedicated to the public under the doctrine of dedication if the embodiments and/or limitations: (1) are not expressly claimed in the claims; and (2) are or are potentially equivalents of express elements and/or limitations in the claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Various features and advantages of the disclosure are set forth in the following clauses:
Clause 1: A golf club head comprising: a front body including a strike face defining a ball striking surface, a hosel, and a frame that at least partially surrounds the strikeface and extends rearward from a perimeter of the strikeface away from the ball striking surface; a rear body coupled to the front body to define a hollow cavity therebetween; and wherein: the strike face and frame are formed from a thermoplastic composite comprising a thermoplastic polymer having a plurality of discontinuous fibers embedded therein; each of the plurality of discontinuous fibers have a length of less than about 40 mm; and between a center of the strike face and the hosel, greater than about 50% of the plurality of discontinuous fibers are aligned within about 30 degrees of parallel to a horizontal axis extending from the center of the strike face to the hosel.
Clause 2: The golf club head of clause 1, wherein the front body comprises a rear edge that abuts the rear body when the rear body is coupled to the front body; and wherein within the frame, greater than about 50% of the plurality of discontinuous fibers are aligned within about 30 degrees of parallel to an axis extending from the ball striking surface to the rear edge and perpendicular to the horizontal axis.
Clause 3: The golf club head of clause 2, wherein the axis extending from the ball striking surface to the rear edge is perpendicular to the rear edge.
Clause 4: The golf club head of any of clauses 1-3, wherein the front body includes: a toe portion on an opposite side of the strike face from the hosel; the frame defining a portion of a crown and a sole; the horizontal axis extending between the crown and the sole and through the center of the strike face; a rear surface on an opposite side of the strike face from the ball striking surface; and wherein the strike face includes a flow leader protruding from the rear surface away from the ball striking surface, the flow leader extending from the toe portion between the crown and the horizontal axis toward the center of the strike face.
Clause 5: The golf club head of clause 4, further comprising a thickened center region protruding from the rear face surface away from the ball striking surface and centered about the center of the strike face.
Clause 6: The golf club head of any of clauses 1-5, wherein the thermoplastic composite is a polyamide and each of the plurality of discontinuous fibers are carbon fibers.
Clause 7: The golf club head of any of clauses 1-6, further comprising a plurality of continuous reinforcing elements embedded within the thermoplastic polymer of the strike face.
Clause 8: The golf club head of clause 7, wherein the plurality of continuous reinforcing elements comprise an orthogonal mesh.
Clause 9: The golf club head of any of clauses 7-8, wherein the plurality of reinforcing elements comprise metallic wires.
Clause 10: The golf club head of any of clauses 7-9, wherein each of the plurality of reinforcing elements have a diameter and at least a first subset of the plurality of reinforcing elements are arranged in a parallel arrangement; wherein adjacent reinforcing elements of the first subset of the plurality of reinforcing elements are spaced apart from each other by a minimum distance; and wherein the minimum distance is at least two times an average diameter of the first subset of reinforcing elements.
Clause 11: A polymeric front body of a golf club head comprising: a strike face defining a ball striking surface, the strike face having a geometric center and defining a horizontal axis extending through the geometric center; a frame that at least partially surrounds the strikeface and extends rearward from a perimeter of the strikeface away from the ball striking surface, the frame defining a crown portion and a sole portion; a hosel, wherein the horizontal axis extends between the geometric center and the hosel and between the crown and at least a portion of the sole; a fan gate extending from the frame between the horizontal axis and the crown.
Clause 12: The polymeric front body of clause 11, wherein the strike face further defines a rear surface opposite the ball striking surface, the front body further comprising: a flow leader protruding from the rear surface away from the ball striking surface, the flow leader extending from a portion of the strike face nearest to the fan gate toward the center of the strike face.
Clause 13: The polymeric front body of clause 12, further comprising a thickened center region protruding from the rear face surface away from the ball striking surface and centered about the geometric center of the strike face.
Clause 14: The polymeric front body of any of clauses 11-13, wherein the strike face and frame comprise a thermoplastic composite comprising a thermoplastic polymer having a plurality of discontinuous fibers embedded therein, each of the plurality of discontinuous fibers have a length of less than about 40 mm.
Clause 15: The polymeric front body of clause 14, wherein between the center of the strike face and the hosel, greater than about 50% of the plurality of discontinuous fibers are aligned within about 30 degrees of parallel to the horizontal axis.
Clause 16: The polymeric front body of any of clauses 14-15, wherein the frame defines a rear edge opposite the strike face, and wherein within the frame, greater than about 50% of the plurality of discontinuous fibers are aligned within about 30 degrees of parallel to an axis extending from the ball striking surface to the rear edge and perpendicular to the horizontal axis.
Clause 17: The polymeric front body of clause 16, wherein the axis extending from the ball striking surface to the rear edge is perpendicular to the rear edge.
Clause 18: The polymeric front body of any of clauses 11-17, further comprising a plurality of reinforcing elements embedded within the strike face.
Clause 19: The polymeric front body of clause 18, wherein the plurality of reinforcing elements comprise an orthogonal mesh.
Clause 20: The polymeric front body of any of clauses 18-19, wherein each of the plurality of reinforcing elements have a diameter and at least a first subset of the plurality of reinforcing elements are arranged in a parallel arrangement; wherein adjacent reinforcing elements of the first subset of the plurality of reinforcing elements are spaced apart from each other by a minimum distance; and wherein the minimum distance is at least two times an average diameter of the first subset of reinforcing elements.
Clause 21: The polymeric front body of any of clauses 18-20, wherein the plurality of reinforcing elements comprise metallic wires.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/949,224, patented as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/235,210, filed Oct. 20, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/252,317, patented as U.S. Pat. No. 10,806,977, filed Jan. 18, 2019, which claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Nos. 62/619,631 filed 19 Jan. 2018; 62/644,319 filed 16 Mar. 2018; 62/702,996 filed 25 Jul. 2018; 62/703,305 filed 25 Jul. 2018; 62/718,857 filed 14 Aug. 2018; 62/770,000 filed 20 Nov. 2018; and 62/781,509 filed 18 Dec. 2018; the disclosure of each of the above-referenced applications and patents are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4581190 | Nagamoto et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4664383 | Aizawa | May 1987 | A |
5068281 | Okumura | Nov 1991 | A |
5080366 | Okumoto et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5193811 | Okumoto et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5328176 | Lo | Jul 1994 | A |
5377986 | Viollaz | Jan 1995 | A |
5445382 | Pearce | Aug 1995 | A |
5586949 | Aizawa | Dec 1996 | A |
5614143 | Hager | Mar 1997 | A |
5624331 | Lo et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5669827 | Nagamoto | Sep 1997 | A |
6354962 | Galloway et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354963 | Kodama et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368234 | Galloway | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381828 | Boyce et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390933 | Galloway et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6435977 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440011 | Hocknell et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471604 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491592 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6565452 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575845 | Galloway et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582323 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6602149 | Jacobson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605007 | Bissonnette et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6648774 | Lee | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6663504 | Hocknell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6739982 | Murphy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6739983 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743118 | Soracco | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758763 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6860823 | Lee | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6926619 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929565 | Nakahara et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6994637 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025692 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029403 | Rice et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7059973 | Erickson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066835 | Evans et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7101289 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108614 | Lo | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115047 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118493 | Galloway | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121955 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121957 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125344 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128661 | Soracco et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137907 | Gibbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144333 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147576 | Imamoto et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163470 | Galloway et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166038 | Williams et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169060 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175541 | Lo | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214142 | Meyer et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7252600 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255654 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258624 | Kobayashi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258625 | Kawaguchi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261645 | Oyama | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7278927 | Gibbs et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297072 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303487 | Kumamoto | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311613 | Stevens et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7318782 | Imamoto et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320646 | Galloway | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338390 | Lindsay | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7344452 | Imamoto et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7367900 | Kumamoto | May 2008 | B2 |
7377860 | Breier et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7387577 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402112 | Galloway | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407448 | Stevens et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7438647 | Hocknell | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7438649 | Ezaki et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448964 | Schweigert et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455600 | Imamoto et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468005 | Kouno et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7488261 | Cackett et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491134 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494424 | Williams et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497788 | Imamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7497789 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510485 | Yamamoto | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7520822 | Yamagishi et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7524249 | Breier et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530901 | Mamoto et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530903 | Imamoto et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540812 | Imamoto et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549935 | Foster et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559851 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568982 | Cackett et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7582248 | Reyes et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591737 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601078 | Mergy et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607992 | Nishio | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632193 | Thielen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658686 | Soracco | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674187 | Cackett et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691008 | Oyama | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708652 | Cackett et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7749096 | Gibbs et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749103 | Nakano | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775903 | Kawaguchi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785212 | Lukasiewicz, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7803065 | Breier et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7854364 | DeShiell et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7922604 | Roach et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7931546 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7938740 | Breier et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7946929 | Wahlin | May 2011 | B2 |
7959523 | Rae et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967591 | Reyes et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7993216 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007371 | Breier et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8025591 | De La Cruz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8197357 | Rice et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8197358 | Watson et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8221261 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8267808 | De La Cruz et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8303433 | Roach et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8308582 | Tanimoto | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8376876 | Gibbs et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8414422 | Peralta et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419569 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425827 | Lee | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435137 | Hirano | May 2013 | B2 |
8444506 | Watson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460123 | Demille et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8491416 | Demille et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8506421 | Stites et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8517859 | Golden et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523705 | Breier et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540588 | Rice et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556746 | DeMille et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8608591 | Chao et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8628434 | Chao | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632419 | Tang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632420 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8696489 | Gibbs et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702534 | DeMille et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8715109 | Bennett et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727911 | DeMille et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8753226 | Rice et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8790196 | Solheim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814723 | Tavares et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8858362 | Leposky et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8870680 | Yamamoto | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8870683 | Hettinger et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8876629 | Deshmukh et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8926450 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938871 | Roach et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8979671 | DeMille et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9033818 | Myrhum et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9033822 | DeMille et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9079368 | Tavares et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9168435 | Boggs et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9174098 | Tayase et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9192826 | Golden et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9199137 | Deshmukh et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9320949 | Golden et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9352198 | Roach et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9393465 | Stokke et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9399157 | Greensmith et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9427631 | Larson et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9457245 | Lee | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9504883 | DeMille et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9526955 | DeMille et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9579548 | Boyd et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9682291 | Chao | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9682299 | Tang et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9717960 | Deshmukh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9724573 | Kawaguchi et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9833666 | Boggs et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9861866 | DeMille et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9908014 | Wester et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
9925432 | Morales et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10016662 | Wester | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10046212 | Sargent et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10143898 | Cornelius et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10300354 | Morales et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10357901 | Deshmukh et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10806977 | Spackman et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11235210 | Spackman | Feb 2022 | B2 |
20020045491 | Reyes | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030134692 | Nakahara et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030186760 | Lee | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040033844 | Chen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040116207 | De Shiell et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040142761 | Evans | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050026719 | Yang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043115 | Lin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050119068 | Onoda et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143189 | Lai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159239 | Imamoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050215351 | Hasegawa | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233831 | Ezaki et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060052177 | Nakahara et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060052181 | Serrano et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079349 | Rae et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060148588 | Gibbs et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060229141 | Galloway | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070060414 | Breier et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070155533 | Solheim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080293512 | Chen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090203465 | Stites et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100137074 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178996 | Chao | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178997 | Gibbs | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234134 | Ulahlin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110028239 | Galloway et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110086723 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20130165258 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130225320 | Woolley et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140128176 | Chao | May 2014 | A1 |
20140243111 | DeMille | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150045130 | Roach | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150108681 | Deshmukh et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150231458 | Petersen et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160016052 | Dolezel et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160310809 | Boggs | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160332040 | Lafortune et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346630 | Sander | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160346644 | Larson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170128792 | Hope et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170340932 | Morales et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0891790 | Jan 1999 | EP |
2004024734 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2006271770 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2013009713 | Jan 2013 | JP |
398984 | Jul 2000 | TW |
2007076304 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2017205699 | May 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
E9 Face Technology With Dual Roll—Multi-material Construction, Cobra Golf, accessed Oct. 19, 2017; https://www.cobragolf.com/pumagolf/tech-overview. |
Taylormade M1 Driveer, Multi-material Construction, accessed Jun. 7, 2016; http://www.intheholegolf.com/TM15-M1D/TaylorMade-M1-Driver.html. |
Adams Men's Golf Speedling Super XTD Fairway Wood; Amazon, accessed Oct. 19, 2017; https://www.amazon.com/Adams-Golf-Speedline-SUPER-Fairway/dp/B007LI2S04. |
Callaway Womens Great Big Bertha Driver, Amazon, accessed Oct. 19, 2017; https:///www.amazon.com/Callaway-Womens-Great-Bertha-Driver/dp/B013SYR0VQ. |
Nike Vapor Flex 440 Driver Adjustable Loft Golf Club Left-Hand, accessed Jun. 7, 2016; http://www.globalgolf.com/golf-clubs/1034365-nike-vapor-flex-440-driver-left-hand/. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT Application No. PCT/US19/14321, dated May 9, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT Application No. PCT/US19/14326, dated May 23, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority from PCT Application No. PCT/US17/034807, dated Aug. 2, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220219051 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62781509 | Dec 2018 | US | |
62770000 | Nov 2018 | US | |
62718857 | Aug 2018 | US | |
62703305 | Jul 2018 | US | |
62702996 | Jul 2018 | US | |
62644319 | Mar 2018 | US | |
62619631 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16949224 | Oct 2020 | US |
Child | 17649314 | US | |
Parent | 16252317 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16949224 | US |