Patent Grant
11013965
The present application concerns golf club heads, and more particularly, golf club heads for wood-type clubs including driver-type, fairway-type, and hybrid-type golf clubs.
In addition to the incorporations discussed further herein, other patents and patent applications concerning golf clubs, such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,753,806; 7,887,434; 8,118,689; 8,663,029; 8,888,607; 8,900,069; 9,186,560; 9,211,447; 9,220,953; 9,220,956; 9,848,405; and 9,700,763 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/859,071, are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Much of the recent improvement activity in the field of golf has involved the use of new and increasingly more sophisticated materials in concert with advanced club-head engineering. For example, modern “wood-type” golf clubs (notably, “drivers,” “fairway woods,” and “utility or hybrid clubs”), with their sophisticated shafts and non-wooden club-heads, bear little resemblance to the “wood” drivers, low-loft long-irons, and higher numbered fairway woods used years ago. These modern wood-type clubs are generally called “metalwoods” since they tend to be made primarily of strong, lightweight metals, such as titanium.
An exemplary metalwood golf club such as a driver or fairway wood typically includes a hollow shaft having a lower end to which the golf club head is attached. Most modern versions of these golf club heads are made, at least in part, of a lightweight but strong metal such as titanium alloy. In many cases, the golf club head comprises a body made primarily of such strong metals.
Some current approaches to reducing structural mass of a metalwood club-head are directed to making one or more portions of the golf club head of an alternative material. Whereas the bodies and face plates of most current metalwoods are made of titanium alloys, some golf club heads are made, at least in part, of components formed from either graphite/epoxy-composite (or other suitable composite material) and a metal alloy. Graphite composites have a much lower density compared to titanium alloys, which offers an opportunity to provide more discretionary mass in the club-head.
The ability to utilize such materials to increase the discretionary mass available for placement at various points in the club-head allows for optimization of a number of physical properties of the club-head which can greatly impact the performance obtained by the user. Forgiveness on a golf shot is generally maximized by configuring the golf club head such that the center of gravity (“CG”) of the golf club head is optimally located and the moment of inertia (“MOI”) of the golf club head is maximized. CG and MOI can also critically affect a golf club head's performance, such as launch angle and flight trajectory on impact with a golf ball, among other characteristics.
In addition to the use of various materials to optimize the strength-to-weight properties and acoustic properties of the golf club heads, advances have been made in the mass distribution properties provided by using thicker and thinner regions of materials, raising and lowering certain portions of the sole and crown, providing adjustable weight members and adjustable head-shaft connection assemblies, and many other golf club head engineering advances.
This application discloses, among other innovations, wood-type golf club heads that provide, among other attributes, improved forgiveness, ball speed, adjustability and playability, while maintaining durability.
The following describes wood-type golf club heads that include a body defining an interior cavity, a sole positioned at a bottom portion of the golf club head and a crown positioned at a top portion. The body also has a face defining a forward portion extending between a heel portion of the golf club head and a toe portion of the golf club head, a rearward portion opposite the face, and a hosel.
Certain of the described golf club heads have a weight channel formed in the sole and defining a path along the sole. In certain instances, a weight member is positioned in or on the weight channel, and may be configured to be adjusted along the path to any of a range of selectable positions in the weight channel to adjust mass properties of the golf club head. In particular instances, a fastener is configured to secure the weight member to the golf club head body in any of the selectable positions along the path. In certain examples, there are at least five, or in some cases at least ten such selectable positions. The fastener may be secured to the golf club head body at a fixed location that is independent of the position of the weight member along the path, so that this position does not change, regardless of where the weight member is positioned along the path.
In certain instances, the path may comprise a substantially linear path extending in a substantially heel-toe direction, or, alternatively, in a substantially forward-rearward direction. In other instances, the path comprises a curved path extending in a substantially heel-toe direction. In some instances, the weight channel is positioned in a forward portion of the sole, and, in particular instances, the channel comprises a toe and a heel end, and wherein the channel curves rearwardly at the toe and heel ends, away from the face. In other instances, the channel is positioned in a rearward portion of the sole, and, in particular instances, the channel comprises a toe end and a heel end, and wherein the channel curves forwardly at the toe and heel ends. In some instances, the weight channel comprises an outer arc that extends at least half of a length of the golf club head from a heel of the golf club head to a toe of the golf club head, or half of a depth of the golf club head from the face to a trailing edge of the golf club head.
The weight member may comprise a forward side and a rearward side. In particular instances, the forward side of the weight member is curved parallel to a corresponding curved forward edge of the weight channel. In some cases, the rearward side is also curved parallel to a corresponding curved rearward edge of the weight channel. In particular instances, the weight member is positioned entirely external to the interior cavity. In some instances, a lower surface of the weight member is approximately parallel to the sole to serve as a ground contact point when the golf club head is soled.
The golf club may comprise a front channel in the sole positioned forward of the weight channel and extending into the interior cavity of the golf club head, the front channel extending substantially in a heel-toe direction. The front channel, or a similar slot channel in addition to the weight channel may increase or enhance the perimeter flexibility of the striking face of the golf club head in order to increase the coefficient of restitution and/or characteristic time of the golf club head and frees up additional discretionary mass which can be utilized elsewhere in the golf club head. In some instances, the front channel, or similar slot or other mechanism is located in the forward portion of the sole of the golf club head, adjacent to or near to the forwardmost edge of the sole. Also, in some instances, the front channel extends into the interior cavity of the golf club head, and in particular cases extends substantially in a heel-toe direction.
In particular instances, the weight member comprises an elongated weight slot that extends through an interior of the weight member, the fastener extends through the weight slot, and is configured to permit the weight member to translate along the path while the fastener is stationary. In some instances, the fastener comprises a fastener head that is recessed within the weight slot and a threaded fastener shaft that extends from the fastener head and is secured to the body at a fastener port in the body. In certain instances, the fastener port is forward of the fastener head. The fastener may be configured to, in a loosened position, allow the weight member to translate along the path as the fastener remains stationary relative to the fastener port. The fastener may further be configured to, in a secured position, retain the weight member in a selected position. In some instances, the fastener may comprise two or more fasteners each passing through the weight slot and secured to the golf club head body at different locations. In some instances, the fastener may itself comprise a removable weight, which mass can be adjusted as desired to adjust mass properties of the golf club head. In some instances, the fastener at least partially covers the weight member. In particular instances, the fastener does not extend through the weight member. In certain cases, the fastener comprises a tab that extends below at least a portion of either a forward edge or a rearward edge of the weight member, and may in particular instances further comprise a removable screw or bolt that extends through the tab and into the body of the golf club head.
The weight channel may have a path dimension representing a distance of travel for the weight member, wherein the distance comprises the distance between a first path end positioned proximate to a first end of the channel and a second path end positioned proximate to a second end of the channel. In particular instances, the weight member may have a first dimension that is normal to the path dimension and a second dimension that is parallel to the path dimension, and in some cases the second dimension is at least 50 percent of the path dimension. In some cases, the second dimension may be at least 70 percent of the path dimension.
In some cases, translating the weight member from a first position adjacent a first end of the channel to a second position adjacent a second end of the channel provides a golf club head center of gravity movement along an x-axis (CGx) of at least 3 mm, at least 4 mm or at least 5 mm. In certain instances, the weight member has a mass of at least 40 grams, or at least 60 grams. In particular instances, the weight member comprises at least 25 percent, or in some cases at least 30 percent, of a total mass of the golf club head. The weight member may comprise a forward side and a rearward side, and have a center of mass that is nearer the forward side than the rearward side. In particular examples, a height of the weight member at the forward side is greater than a height of the weight member at the rearward side. The weight member may in some instances be tapered down from the forward side to the rearward side. Additionally or alternatively, the weight member may comprise two or more stepped portions. In particular cases, a first stepped portion at the forward side has a first height that is greater than a second height of a second stepped portion at the rearward side. In some cases, wherein the rearward side of the weight member comprises a chamfered edge. In particular instances, the golf club head further comprises a polymeric pad positioned between the chamfered edge and the body. The rearward end of the weight member may comprise a recessed ledge portion that corresponds to a protruding ledge portion on the golf club head body, such as in the weight channel. In some cases, a polymeric pad may be positioned between the recessed ledge portion and the protruding ledge portion.
In particular instances, the weight member is configured to move in an arcuate path defined by a center axis of curvature located rearward of the face, rearward of the weight channel, and/or rearward of a center of gravity of the golf club head. In some cases, the weight member is configured to move in an arc of less than 90 degrees, or less than 180 degrees around the center axis of curvature. In particular cases, the weight member may be configured to move around the center axis of curvature in an arc of between 5 degrees and 90 degrees, between 10 degrees and 30 degrees, or between 15 degrees and 45 degrees. Additionally or alternatively, the weight member may be configured to move around a center axis of curvature, wherein the center axis of curvature is not collocated with a position of the fastener.
In some instances, the golf club head may have a balance point up (BP Up) value of less than 23 mm, less than 22 mm, or less than 20 mm.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the disclosed technology will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The following describes embodiments of golf club heads for metalwood type golf clubs, including drivers, fairway woods, rescue clubs, hybrid clubs, and the like. Several of the golf club heads incorporate features that provide the golf club heads and/or golf clubs with increased moments of inertia and low centers of gravity, centers of gravity located in preferable locations, improved golf club head and face geometries, increased sole and lower face flexibility, higher coefficients or restitution (“COR”) and characteristic times (“CT”), and/or decreased backspin rates relative to fairway wood and other golf club heads that have come before.
This disclosure describes embodiments of golf club heads in the exemplary context of fairway wood-type golf clubs, but the principles, methods and designs described may be applicable in whole or in part to other wood-type golf clubs, such as drivers, utility clubs (also known as hybrid clubs), rescue clubs, and the like.
The disclosed inventive features include all novel and non-obvious features disclosed herein, both alone and in novel and non-obvious combinations with other elements. As used herein, the phrase “and/or” means “and,” “or” and both “and” and “or.” As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” refer to one or more than one, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, the terms “including” and “having” (and their grammatical variants) mean “comprising.”
This disclosure also refers to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. The drawings illustrate specific embodiments, but other embodiments may be formed and structural changes may be made without departing from the intended scope of this disclosure and the technology discussed herein. Directions and references (e.g., up, down, top, bottom, left, right, rearward, forward, heelward, toeward, etc.) may be used to facilitate discussion of the drawings but are not intended to be limiting. For example, certain terms may be used such as “up,” “down,” “upper,” “lower,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left,” “right” and the like. These terms are used where applicable, to provide some clarity of description when dealing with relative relationships, particularly with respect to the illustrated embodiments. Such terms are not, however, intended to imply absolute relationships, positions and/or orientations, unless otherwise indicated. For example, with respect to an object, an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning the object over. Nevertheless, it is still the same object. Accordingly, the following detailed description shall not be construed in a limiting sense and the scope of property rights sought shall be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Golf club head “forgiveness” generally describes the ability of a golf club head to deliver a desirable golf ball trajectory despite a miss-hit (e.g., a ball struck at a location on the face plate other than an ideal impact location, e.g., an impact location where coefficient of restitution is maximized). Large mass moments of inertia contribute to the overall forgiveness of a golf club head. In addition, a low center-of-gravity improves forgiveness for golf club heads used to strike a ball from the turf by giving a higher launch angle and a lower spin trajectory (which improves the distance of a fairway wood golf shot). Providing a rearward center-of-gravity reduces the likelihood of a slice or fade for many golfers. Accordingly, forgiveness of fairway wood golf club heads, can be improved using the techniques described above to achieve high moments of inertia and low center-of-gravity compared to conventional fairway wood golf club heads.
For example, a golf club head with a crown thickness less than about 0.65 mm throughout at least about 70% of the crown can provide significant discretionary mass. A 0.60 mm thick crown formed from steel can provide as much as about 8 grams of discretionary mass compared to a 0.80 mm thick crown. Alternatively, a 0.80 mm thick crown formed from a composite material having a density of about 1.5 g/cc can provide as much as about 26 grams of discretionary mass compared to a 0.80 mm thick crown formed from steel. The large discretionary mass can be distributed to improve the mass moments of inertia and desirably locate the golf club head center-of-gravity. Generally, discretionary mass should be located sole-ward rather than crown-ward to maintain a low center-of-gravity, forward rather than rearward to maintain a forwardly positioned center of gravity, and rearward rather than forward to maintain a rearwardly positioned center-of-gravity. In addition, discretionary mass should be located far from the center-of-gravity and near the perimeter of the golf club head to maintain high mass moments of inertia.
Another parameter that contributes to the forgiveness and successful playability and desirable performance of a golf club is the coefficient of restitution (COR) of the golf club head. Upon impact with a golf ball, the golf club head's face plate deflects and rebounds, thereby imparting energy to the struck golf ball. The golf club head's coefficient of restitution is the ratio of the velocity of separation to the velocity of approach. A thin face plate generally will deflect more than a thick face plate. Thus, a properly constructed club with a thin, flexible face plate can impart a higher initial velocity to a golf ball, which is generally desirable, than a club with a thick, rigid face plate. In order to maximize the moment of inertia (MOI) about the center of gravity (CG) and achieve a high COR, it typically is desirable to incorporate thin walls and a thin face plate into the design of the golf club head. Thin walls afford the designers additional leeway in distributing golf club head mass to achieve desired mass distribution, and a thinner face plate may provide for a relatively higher COR.
Thus, thin walls are important to a club's performance. However, overly thin walls can adversely affect the golf club head's durability. Problems also arise from stresses distributed across the golf club head upon impact with the golf ball, particularly at junctions of golf club head components, such as the junction of the face plate with other golf club head components (e.g., the sole, skirt, and crown). One prior solution has been to provide a reinforced periphery about the face plate, such as by welding, in order to withstand the repeated impacts. Another approach to combat stresses at impact is to use one or more ribs extending substantially from the crown to the sole vertically, and in some instances extending from the toe to the heel horizontally, across an inner surface of the face plate. These approaches tend to adversely affect club performance characteristics, e.g., diminishing the size of the sweet spot, and/or inhibiting design flexibility in both mass distribution and the face structure of the golf club head. Thus, these golf club heads fail to provide optimal MOI, CG, and/or COR parameters, and as a result, fail to provide much forgiveness for off-center hits for all but the most expert golfers.
Thus, the golf club heads of this disclosure are designed to allow for introduction of a face which can be adjusted in thickness as needed or desired to interact with the other disclosed aspects, such as a channel or slot positioned behind the face, as well as increased areas of mass and/or removable weights. The golf club heads of this disclosure may utilize, for example, the variable thickness face features described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,353,786, 6,997,820, 6,800,038, and 6,824,475, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Additionally, the mass of the face, as well as other of the above-described properties can be adjusted by using different face materials, structures, and features, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. RE 42,544; 8,096,897; 7,985,146; 7,874,936; 7,874,937; 8,628,434; and 7,267,620; and U.S. Patent Pub. Nos. 2008/0149267 and 2009/0163289, which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. Additionally, the structure of the front channel, club head face, and surrounding features of any of the embodiments herein can be varied to further impact COR and related aspects of the golf club head performance, as further described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,662,545; and U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2016/0023062, which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Golf club heads and many of their physical characteristics disclosed herein will be described using “normal address position” as the golf club head reference position, unless otherwise indicated. The normal address position of the club head is defined as the angular position of the head relative to a horizontal ground plane when the shaft axis lies in a vertical plane that is perpendicular to the centerface target line vector and when the shaft axis defines a lie angle relative to the ground plane such that the scorelines on the face of the club are horizontal (if the club does not have scorelines, then the normal address position lie angle shall be defined as 60-degrees). The centerface target line vector is defined as a horizontal vector that points forward (along the Y-axis) from the centerface point of the face. The centerface point (axis origin point) can be defined as the geometric center of the striking surface and/or can be defined as an ideal impact location on the striking surface.
In addition to the thickness of the face plate and the walls of the golf club head, the location of the center of gravity also has a significant effect on the COR and other properties of a golf club head. For example, as illustrated in
When the projected CG point 255 is well above the center 105 of the face, impact efficiency, which is measured by COR, is not maximized. It has been discovered that a fairway wood with a relatively lower CG projection or a CG projection located at or near an ideal impact location on the striking surface of the club face, as described more fully below, improves the impact efficiency of the golf club head as well as initial ball speed. One important ball launch parameter, namely ball spin, is also improved.
The distance from the ground plane 210 to the Projected CG point 255 may also be an advantageous measurement of golf head playability, and may be represented by a CG plane 250 that is parallel to the ground plane 210. The distance 260 from the ground plane 210 to this CG plane 250 representing CG projection on the face plate 111 may be referred to as the balance point up (BP Up), as also illustrated in
Additionally, “Zup,” as further described herein, may also provide an advantageous measurement of golf club head playability. Zup generally refers to the height of the CG above the ground plane as measured along the z-axis. For example, as illustrated in
Fairway wood shots typically involve impacts that occur below the center of the face, and ball speed and launch parameters are often less than ideal. This results because most fairway wood shots are from the ground and not from a tee, and most golfers have a tendency to hit their fairway wood ground shots low on the face of the golf club head. Maximum ball speed is typically achieved when the ball is struck at a location on the striking face where the COR is greatest.
For traditionally designed fairway woods, the location where the COR is greatest is the same as the location of the CG projection on the striking surface. This location, however, is generally higher on the striking surface than the below center location of typical ball impacts during play. In contrast to these conventional golf clubs, it has been discovered that greater shot distance is achieved by configuring the golf club head to have a CG projection that is located near to the center of the striking surface of the golf club head.
It is known that the coefficient of restitution of a golf club may be increased by increasing the height Hss of the face plate—illustrated in
The United States Golf Association (USGA) regulations constrain golf club head shapes, sizes, and moments of inertia. Due to these constraints, golf club manufacturers and designers struggle to produce golf club heads having maximum size and moment of inertia characteristics while maintaining all other golf club head characteristics. For example, one such constraint is a volume limitation of 460 cm3. In general, volume is measured using the water displacement method. However, the USGA will fill any significant cavities in the sole or series of cavities which have a collective volume of greater than 15 cm3.
To produce a more forgiving golf club head, designers struggle to maximize certain parameters such as face area, moment of inertia about the z-axis and x-axis, and address area. A larger face area makes the golf club head more forgiving. Likewise, higher moment of inertia about the z-axis and x-axis makes the golf club head more forgiving. Similarly, a larger front to back dimension will generally increase moment of inertia about the z-axis and x-axis because mass is moved further from the center of gravity and the moment of inertia of a mass about a given axis is proportional to the square of the distance of the mass away from the axis. Additionally, a larger front to back dimension will generally lead to a larger address area which inspires confidence in the golfer when s/he addresses the golf ball.
However, when designers seek to maximize the above parameters it becomes difficult to stay within the volume limits and golf club head mass targets. Additionally, the sole curvature begins to flatten as these parameters are maximized. A flat sole curvature provides poor acoustics. To counteract this problem, designers may add a significant amount of ribs to the internal cavity to stiffen the overall structure and/or thicken the sole material to stiffen the overall structure. See for example
A golf club head Characteristic Time (CT) can be described as a numerical characterization of the flexibility of a golf club head striking face. The CT may also vary at points distant from the center of the striking face, but may not vary greater than approximately 20% of the CT as measured at the center of the striking face. The CT values for the golf club heads described in the present application were calculated based on the method outlined in the USGA “Procedure for Measuring the Flexibility of a Golf Clubhead,” Revision 2.0, Mar. 25, 2005, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Specifically, the method described in the sections entitled “3. Summary of Method,” “5. Testing Apparatus Set-up and Preparation,” “6. Club Preparation and Mounting,” and “7. Club Testing” are exemplary sections that are relevant. Specifically, the characteristic time is the time for the velocity to rise from 5% of a maximum velocity to 95% of the maximum velocity under the test set forth by the USGA as described above.
The front end 104 includes a face plate 111 (
Near the face plate 111, a front channel 114 is formed in the sole 103. As illustrated in
As best illustrated in
The body 102 can further include a raised sole portion 160 that is recessed up from the rear sole surface 118. The raised sole portion 160 can span over any portion of the sole 103, and in the illustrated embodiment the raised sole portion 160 spans over most of the rearward portion of the sole. The sole 103 can include a sloped transition portion where the intermediate ground contact surface 116 transitions up to the raised sole portion 160. The sole can also include other similar sloped portions (not shown), such as around the boundary of the raised sole portion 160. In some embodiments (not shown), one or more cantilevered ribs or struts can be included on the sole that span from the sloped transition portion to the raised sole portion 160, to provide increased stiffness and rigidity to the sole.
The raised sole portion 160 can optionally include grooves, channels, ridges, or other surface features that increase its rigidity. Similarly, the intermediate ground contact surface 116 can include stiffening surface features, such as ridges, though grooves or other stiffening features can be substituted for the ridges.
A sole such as the sole 103 of the golf club head 100 may be referred to as a two-tier construction, bi-level construction, raised sole construction, or dropped sole construction, in which one portion of the sole is raised or recessed relative to the other portion of the sole. The terms raised, lowered, recessed, dropped, etc. are relative terms depending on perspective. For example, the intermediate ground contact surface 116 could be considered “raised” relative to the raised sole portion 160 and the weight channel 130 when the head is upside down with the sole facing upwardly as in
Additional disclosure regarding the use of recessed or dropped soles is provided in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/515,401, filed on Jun. 5, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The raised sole constructions described herein and in the incorporated references are counterintuitive because the raised portion of the sole tends to raise the Iyy position, which is sometimes considered disadvantageous. However, the raised sole portion 160 (and other raised sole portions disclosed herein) allows for a smaller radius of curvature for that portion of the sole (compared to a conventional sole without the raised sole portion) resulting in increased rigidity and better acoustic properties due to the increased stiffness from the geometry. This stiffness increase means fewer ribs or even no ribs are needed in that portion of the sole to achieve a desired first mode frequency, such as 3000 Hz or above, 3200 Hz or above, or even 3400 Hz or above. Fewer ribs provides a mass/weight savings, which allows for more discretionary mass that can be strategically placed elsewhere in the golf club head or incorporated into user adjustable movable weights.
Furthermore, sloped transition portions around the raised sole portion 160, as well as optional grooves and ridges associated therewith can provide additional structural support and additional rigidity for the golf club head, and can also modify and even fine tune the acoustic properties of the golf club head. The sound and modal frequencies emitted by the golf club head when it strikes a golf ball are very important to the sensory experience of a golfer and provide functional feedback as to where the ball impact occurs on the face (and whether the ball is well struck).
In some embodiments, the raised sole portion 160 can be made of a relatively thinner and/or less dense material compared to other portions of the sole and body that take more stress, such as the ground contact surfaces 112, 116, 118, the face region, and the hosel region. By reducing the mass of the raised sole portion 160, the higher CG effect of raising that portion of the sole is mitigated while maintaining a stronger, heavier material on other portions of the sole and body to promote a lower CG and provide added strength in the area of the sole and body where it is most needed (e.g., in a sole region proximate to the hosel and around the face and shaft connection components where stress is higher).
The body 102 can also include one or more internal ribs, such as ribs 192, as best shown in
Generally, the center of gravity (CG) of a golf club head is the average location of the weight of the golf club head or the point at which the entire weight of the golf club-head may be considered as concentrated so that if supported at this point the head would remain in equilibrium in any position. A golf club head origin coordinate system can be defined such that the location of various features of the golf club head, including the CG, can be determined with respect to a golf club head origin positioned at the geometric center of the striking surface and when the club-head is at the normal address position (i.e., the club-head position wherein a vector normal to the club face substantially lies in a first vertical plane perpendicular to the ground plane, the centerline axis of the club shaft substantially lies in a second substantially vertical plane, and the first vertical plane and the second substantially vertical plane substantially perpendicularly intersect).
The head origin coordinate system defined with respect to the head origin includes three axes: a head origin z-axis (or simply “z-axis”) extending through the head origin in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground; a head origin x-axis (or simply “x-axis”) extending through the head origin in a toe-to-heel direction generally parallel to the striking surface (e.g., generally tangential to the striking surface at the center) and generally perpendicular to the z-axis; and a head origin y-axis (or simply “y-axis”) extending through the head origin in a front-to-back direction and generally perpendicular to the x-axis and to the z-axis. The x-axis and the y-axis both extend in generally horizontal directions relative to the ground when the golf club head is at the normal address position. The x-axis extends in a positive direction from the origin towards the heel of the golf club head. The y axis extends in a positive direction from the head origin towards the rear portion of the golf club head. The z-axis extends in a positive direction from the origin towards the crown. Thus for example, and using millimeters as the unit of measure, a CG that is located 3.2 mm from the head origin toward the toe of the golf club head along the x-axis, 36.7 mm from the head origin toward the rear of the clubhead along the y-axis, and 4.1 mm from the head origin toward the sole of the golf club head along the z-axis can be defined as having a CGx of −3.2 mm, a CGy of +36.7 mm, and a CGz of −4.1 mm.
Further as used herein, Delta 1 is a measure of how far rearward in the golf club head body the CG is located. More specifically, Delta 1 is the distance between the CG and the hosel axis along the y axis (in the direction straight toward the back of the body of the golf club face from the geometric center of the striking face). It has been observed that smaller values of Delta 1 result in lower projected CGs on the golf club head face. Thus, for embodiments of the disclosed golf club heads in which the projected CG on the ball striking club face is lower than the geometric center, reducing Delta 1 can lower the projected CG and increase the distance between the geometric center and the projected CG. Note also that a lower projected CG can promote a higher launch and a reduction in backspin due to the z-axis gear effect. Thus, for particular embodiments of the disclosed golf club heads, in some cases the Delta 1 values are relatively low, thereby reducing the amount of backspin on the golf ball helping the golf ball obtain the desired high launch, low spin trajectory.
Similarly, Delta 2 is the distance between the CG and the hosel axis along the x axis (in the direction straight toward the back of the body of the golf club face from the geometric center of the striking face).
Adjusting the location of the discretionary mass in a golf club head as described herein can provide the desired Delta 1 value. For instance, Delta 1 can be manipulated by varying the mass in front of the CG (closer to the face) with respect to the mass behind the CG. That is, by increasing the mass behind the CG with respect to the mass in front of the CG, Delta 1 can be increased. In a similar manner, by increasing the mass in front of the CG with the respect to the mass behind the CG, Delta 1 can be decreased.
In addition to the position of the CG of a club-head with respect to the head origin another important property of a golf club-head is the projected CG point, e.g., projected CG point 255 discussed above. This projected CG point (also referred to as “CG Proj”) can also be referred to as the “zero-torque” point because it indicates the point on the ball striking club face that is centered with the CG. Thus, if a golf ball makes contact with the club face at the projected CG point, the golf club head will not twist about any axis of rotation since no torque is produced by the impact of the golf ball. A negative number for this property indicates that the projected CG point is below the geometric center of the face. So, in the exemplary golf club head illustrated in
In terms of the MOI of the club-head (i.e., a resistance to twisting) it is typically measured about each of the three main axes of a club-head with the CG as the origin of the coordinate system. These three axes include a CG z-axis extending through the CG in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground when the golf club head is at normal address position; a CG x-axis extending through the CG origin in a toe-to-heel direction generally parallel to the striking surface (e.g., generally tangential to the striking surface at the club face center), and generally perpendicular to the CG z-axis; and a CG y-axis extending through the CG origin in a front-to-back direction and generally perpendicular to the CG x-axis and to the CG z-axis. The CG x-axis and the CG y-axis both extend in generally horizontal directions relative to the ground when the golf club head is at normal address position. The CG x-axis extends in a positive direction from the CG origin to the heel of the golf club head. The CG y-axis extends in a positive direction from the CG origin towards the rear portion of the golf club head. The CG z-axis extends in a positive direction from the CG origin towards the crown. Thus, the axes of the CG origin coordinate system are parallel to corresponding axes of the head origin coordinate system. In particular, the CG z-axis is parallel to the z-axis, the CG x-axis is parallel to the x-axis, and CG y-axis is parallel to the y-axis.
Specifically, a golf club head has a moment of inertia about the vertical CG z-axis (“Izz”), a moment of inertia about the heel/toe CG x-axis (“Ixx”), and a moment of inertia about the front/back CG y-axis (“Iyy”). Typically, however, the MOI about the CG z-axis (Izz) and the CG x-axis (Ixx) is most relevant to golf club head forgiveness.
A moment of inertia about the golf club head CG x-axis (Ixx) is calculated by the following Equation 1:
Ixx=∫(y2+z2)dm (1)
where y is the distance from a golf club head CG xz-plane to an infinitesimal mass dm and z is the distance from a golf club head CG xy-plane to the infinitesimal mass dm. The golf club head CG xz-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG x-axis and the golf club head CG z-axis. The CG xy-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CGx-axis and the golf club head CG y-axis.
Similarly, a moment of inertia about the golf club head CG z-axis (Izz) is calculated by the following Equation 2:
Izz=∫(x2+y2)dm (2)
where x is the distance from a golf club head CG yz-plane to an infinitesimal mass dm and y is the distance from the golf club head CG xz-plane to the infinitesimal mass dm. The golf club head CG yz-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG y-axis and the golf club head CG z-axis.
A further description of the coordinate systems for determining CG positions and MOI can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,358,430, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
An alternative, above ground, club head coordinate system places the head origin at the intersection of the z-axis and the ground plane, providing positive z-axis coordinates for every club head feature. As used herein, “Zup” means the CG z-axis location determined according to this above ground coordinate system. Zup generally refers to the height of the CG above the ground plane 210 as measured along the z-axis, which is illustrated, e.g., by Zup line 232 extending from the CG 230 illustrated in
As described herein, desired golf club head mass moments of inertia, golf club head center-of-gravity locations, and other mass properties of a golf club head can be attained by distributing golf club head mass to particular locations. Discretionary mass generally refers to the mass of material that can be removed from various structures providing mass that can be distributed elsewhere for tuning one or more mass moments of inertia and/or locating the golf club head center-of-gravity.
Golf club head walls provide one source of discretionary mass. In other words, a reduction in wall thickness reduces the wall mass and provides mass that can be distributed elsewhere. Thin walls, particularly a thin crown 109, provide significant discretionary mass compared to conventional golf club heads. For example, a golf club head made from an alloy of steel can achieve about 4 grams of discretionary mass for each 0.1 mm reduction in average crown thickness. Similarly, a golf club head made from an alloy of titanium can achieve about 2.5 grams of discretionary mass for each 0.1 mm reduction in average crown thickness. Discretionary mass achieved using a thin crown, e.g., less than about 0.65 mm, can be used to tune one or more mass moments of inertia and/or center-of-gravity location.
To achieve a thin wall on the golf club head body 102, such as a thin crown 109, a golf club head body 102 can be formed from an alloy of steel or an alloy of titanium. For further details concerning titanium casting, please refer to U.S. Pat. No. 7,513,296, incorporated herein by reference.
Additionally, the thickness of the hosel 162 may be varied to provide for additional discretionary mass, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,731,176, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Various approaches can be used for positioning discretionary mass within a golf club head. For example, golf club heads may have one or more integral mass pads (not shown in the illustrated embodiments) cast into the head at predetermined locations that can be used to lower, to move forward, to move rearward, or otherwise to adjust the location of the golf club head's center-of-gravity, as further described herein. Also, epoxy can be added to the interior of the golf club head, such as through an epoxy port 115 (illustrated in
Alternatively, weights can be attached in a manner which allows adjustment of certain mass properties of the golf club head. For example,
As shown in
As best illustrated in
A wood-type golf club head, such as golf club head 100 and the other wood-type club heads disclosed herein have a volume, typically measured in cubic-centimeters (cm3) equal to the volumetric displacement of the club head, assuming any apertures are sealed by a substantially planar surface. (See United States Golf Association “Procedure for Measuring the Club Head Size of Wood Clubs,” Revision 1.0, Nov. 21, 2003). In other words, for a golf club head with one or more weight ports within the head, it is assumed that the weight ports are either not present or are “covered” by regular, imaginary surfaces, such that the club head volume is not affected by the presence or absence of ports.
In some embodiments, as in the case of a fairway wood (as illustrated), the golf club head may have a volume between about 100 cm3 and about 300 cm3, such as between about 150 cm3 and about 250 cm3, or between about 130 cm3 and about 190 cm3, or between about 125 cm3 and about 240 cm3, and a total mass between about 125 g and about 260 g, or between about 200 g and about 250 g. In the case of a utility or hybrid club (analogous to the illustrated embodiments), the golf club head may have a volume between about 60 cm3 and about 150 cm3, or between about 85 cm3 and about 120 cm3, and a total mass between about 125 g and about 280 g, or between about 200 g and about 250 g. In the case of a driver (analogous to the illustrated embodiments), any of the disclosed golf club heads can have a volume between about 300 cm3 and about 600 cm3, between about 350 cm3 and about 600 cm3, and/or between about 350 cm3 and about 500 cm3, and can have a total mass between about 145 g and about 260 g, such as between about 195 g and about 205 g.
In some of the embodiments described herein, a comparatively forgiving golf club head for a fairway wood can combine an overall golf club head height (Hch)—illustrated in
The crown insert 168, disclosed in various embodiments herein, can help overcome manufacturing challenges associated with conventional golf club heads having normal continuous crowns made of titanium or other metals, and can replace a relatively heavy component of the crown with a lighter material, freeing up discretionary mass which can be strategically allocated elsewhere within the golf club head. In certain embodiments, the crown may comprise a composite material, such as those described herein and in the incorporated disclosures, such as a composite material having a density of less than 2 grams per cubic centimeter. In still further embodiments, the material has a density of no more than 1.5 grams per cubic centimeter, or a density between 1 gram per cubic centimeter and 2 grams per cubic centimeter. Providing a lighter crown further provides the golf club head with additional discretionary mass, which can be used elsewhere within the golf club head to serve the purposes of the designer. For example, with the discretionary mass, additional ribs 192 can be strategically added to the hollow interior of the golf club head and thereby improve the acoustic properties of the head. Discretionary mass in the form of ribs, mass pads or other features also can be strategically located in the interior, or even on the exterior of the golf club head to shift the effective CG fore or aft, toeward or heelward or both (apart from any further CG adjustments made possible by adjustable weight features) or to improve desirable MOI characteristics, as further described herein.
Methods of making any of the golf club heads disclosed herein, or associated golf clubs, may include one or more of the following steps:
The bodies of the golf club heads disclosed herein, and optionally other components of the club heads as well, serve as frames and may be made from a variety of different types of suitable materials. In some embodiments, for example, the body and/or other head components can be made of a metal material such as steel and steel alloys, a titanium or titanium alloy (including but not limited to 6-4 titanium, 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), or aluminum and aluminum alloys (including but not limited to 3000 series alloys, 5000 series alloys, 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6, and 7000 series alloys, such as 7075). The body may be formed by conventional casting, metal stamping or other known processes. The body also may be made of other metals as well as non-metals. The body can provide a framework or skeleton for the club head to strengthen the club head in areas of high stress caused by the golf ball's impact with the face, such as the transition region where the club head transitions from the face to the crown area, sole area and skirt area located between the sole and crown areas.
In some embodiments, the sole insert and/or crown insert of the club head may be made from a variety of composite materials and/or polymeric materials, such as from a thermoplastic material, preferably from a thermoplastic composite laminate material, and most preferably from a thermoplastic carbon composite laminate material. For example, the composite material may comprise an injection moldable material, thermoformable material, thermoset composite material or other composite material suitable for golf club head applications. One exemplary material is a thermoplastic continuous carbon fiber composite laminate material having long, aligned carbon fibers in a PPS (polyphenylene sulfide) matrix or base. One commercial example of this type of material, which is manufactured in sheet form, is TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 manufactured by Lanxess.
TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 is a high strength, lightweight material having multiple layers of continuous carbon fiber reinforcement in a PPS thermoplastic matrix or polymer to embed the fibers. The material may have a 54% fiber volume but other volumes (such as a volume of 42% to 57%) will suffice. The material weighs about 200 g/m2.
Another similar exemplary material which may be used for the crown insert and/or sole insert is TEPEX® DYNALITE 208. This material also has a carbon fiber volume range of 42% to 57%, including a 45% volume in one example, and a weight of 200 g/m2. DYNALITE 208 differs from DYNALITE 207 in that it has a TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) matrix or base rather than a polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) matrix.
By way of example, the TEPEX® DYNALITE 207 sheet(s) (or other selected material such as DYNALITE 208) are oriented in different directions, placed in a two-piece (male/female) matched die, heated past the melt temperature, and formed to shape when the die is closed. This process may be referred to as thermoforming and is especially well-suited for forming sole and crown inserts.
Once the crown insert and/or sole insert are formed (separately) by the thermoforming process just described, each is cooled and removed from the matched die. The sole and crown inserts are shown as having a uniform thickness, which lends itself well to the thermoforming process and ease of manufacture. However, the sole and crown inserts may have a variable thickness to strengthen select local areas of the insert by, for example, adding additional plies in select areas to enhance durability, acoustic or other properties in those areas.
A crown insert and/or sole insert can have a complex three-dimensional curvature corresponding generally to the crown and sole shapes of a fairway wood-type club head and specifically to the design specifications and dimensions of the particular head designed by the manufacturer. It will be appreciated that other types of club heads, such as drivers, utility clubs (also known as hybrid clubs), rescue clubs, and the like may be manufactured using one or more of the principles, methods and materials described herein.
In an alternative embodiment, the sole insert and/or crown insert can be made by a process other than thermoforming, such as injection molding or thermosetting. In a thermoset process, the sole insert and/or crown insert may be made from prepreg plies of woven or unidirectional composite fiber fabric (such as carbon fiber) that is preimpregnated with resin and hardener formulations that activate when heated. The prepreg plies are placed in a mold suitable for a thermosetting process, such as a compression mold, e.g., a metal matched compression mold, or a bladder mold, and stacked/oriented with the carbon or other fibers oriented in different directions. The plies are heated to activate the chemical reaction and form the sole (or crown) insert. Each insert is cooled and removed from its respective mold. Additional disclosure regarding methods of forming sole and/or crown inserts can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,579,549, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
The carbon fiber reinforcement material for the thermoset sole/crown insert may be a carbon fiber known as “34-700” fiber, available from Grafil, Inc., of Sacramento, Calif., which has a tensile modulus of 234 Gpa (34 Msi) and tensile strength of 4500 Mpa (650 Ksi). Another suitable fiber, also available from Grafil, Inc., is a carbon fiber known as “TR50S” fiber which has a tensile modulus of 240 Gpa (35 Msi) and tensile strength of 4900 Mpa (710 Ksi). Exemplary epoxy resins for the prepreg plies used to form the thermoset crown and sole inserts are Newport 301 and 350 and are available from Newport Adhesives & Composites, Inc., of Irvine, Calif.
In one example, the prepreg sheets have a quasi-isotropic fiber reinforcement of 34-700 fiber having an areal weight of about 70 g/m2 and impregnated with an epoxy resin (e.g., Newport 301), resulting in a resin content (R/C) of about 40%. For convenience of reference, the primary composition of a prepreg sheet can be specified in abbreviated form by identifying its fiber areal weight, type of fiber, e.g., 70 FAW 34-700. The abbreviated form can further identify the resin system and resin content, e.g., 70 FAW 34-700/301, R/C 40%.
Once the sole insert and crown insert are formed, they can be joined to the body in a manner that creates a strong integrated construction adapted to withstand normal stress, loading and wear and tear expected of commercial golf clubs. For example, the sole insert and crown insert each may be bonded to the frame using epoxy adhesive, such as an adhesive applied between an interior surface of each respective insert and a corresponding exterior surface of the body, with the crown insert seated in and overlying the crown opening and the sole insert seated in and overlying the sole opening. Alternatively, a sole insert or crown insert may be attached inside an internal cavity of the body and then subsequently attached by securing an exterior surface of the insert to an interior surface of the body. Alternative attachment methods for bonding an insert to either an internal or an external surface of the body include bolts, rivets, snap fit, adhesives, other known joining methods or any combination thereof.
Exemplary polymers for the embodiments described herein may include without limitation, synthetic and natural rubbers, thermoset polymers such as thermoset polyurethanes or thermoset polyureas, as well as thermoplastic polymers including thermoplastic elastomers such as thermoplastic polyurethanes, thermoplastic polyureas, metallocene catalyzed polymer, unimodalethylene/carboxylic acid copolymers, unimodal ethylene/carboxylic acid/carboxylate terpolymers, bimodal ethylene/carboxylic acid copolymers, bimodal ethylene/carboxylic acid/carboxylate terpolymers, polyamides (PA), polyketones (PK), copolyamides, polyesters, copolyesters, polycarbonates, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), cyclic olefin copolymers (COC), polyolefins, halogenated polyolefins [e.g. chlorinated polyethylene (CPE)], halogenated polyalkylene compounds, polyalkenamer, polyphenylene oxides, polyphenylene sulfides, diallylphthalate polymers, polyimides, polyvinyl chlorides, polyamide-ionomers, polyurethane ionomers, polyvinyl alcohols, polyarylates, polyacrylates, polyphenylene ethers, impact-modified polyphenylene ethers, polystyrenes, high impact polystyrenes, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers, styrene-acrylonitriles (SAN), acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylonitriles, styrene-maleic anhydride (S/MA) polymers, styrenic block copolymers including styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene, (SEBS) and styrene-ethylene-propylene-styrene (SEPS), styrenic terpolymers, functionalized styrenic block copolymers including hydroxylated, functionalized styrenic copolymers, and terpolymers, cellulosic polymers, liquid crystal polymers (LCP), ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymers (EPDM), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA), ethylene-propylene copolymers, propylene elastomers (such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,157, to Kim et al, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference), ethylene vinyl acetates, polyureas, and polysiloxanes and any and all combinations thereof.
Of these preferred are polyamides (PA), polyphthalimide (PPA), polyketones (PK), copolyamides, polyesters, copolyesters, polycarbonates, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), cyclic olefin copolymers (COC), polyphenylene oxides, diallylphthalate polymers, polyarylates, polyacrylates, polyphenylene ethers, and impact-modified polyphenylene ethers. Especially preferred polymers for use in the golf club heads of the present invention are the family of so called high performance engineering thermoplastics which are known for their toughness and stability at high temperatures. These polymers include the polysulfones, the polyetherimides, and the polyamide-imides. Of these, the most preferred are the polysufones.
Aromatic polysulfones are a family of polymers produced from the condensation polymerization of 4,4′-dichlorodiphenylsulfone with itself or one or more dihydric phenols. The aromatic polysulfones include the thermoplastics sometimes called polyether sulfones, and the general structure of their repeating unit has a diaryl sulfone structure which may be represented as -arylene-SO2-arylene-. These units may be linked to one another by carbon-to-carbon bonds, carbon-oxygen-carbon bonds, carbon-sulfur-carbon bonds, or via a short alkylene linkage, so as to form a thermally stable thermoplastic polymer. Polymers in this family are completely amorphous, exhibit high glass-transition temperatures, and offer high strength and stiffness properties even at high temperatures, making them useful for demanding engineering applications. The polymers also possess good ductility and toughness and are transparent in their natural state by virtue of their fully amorphous nature. Additional key attributes include resistance to hydrolysis by hot water/steam and excellent resistance to acids and bases. The polysulfones are fully thermoplastic, allowing fabrication by most standard methods such as injection molding, extrusion, and thermoforming. They also enjoy a broad range of high temperature engineering uses.
Three commercially significant polysulfones are:
Particularly important and preferred aromatic polysulfones are those comprised of repeating units of the structure —C6H4SO2—C6H4—O— where C6H4 represents an m- or p-phenylene structure. The polymer chain can also comprise repeating units such as —C6H4—, C6H4—O—, —C6H4-(lower-alkylene)-C6H4—O—, —C6H4—O—C6H4—O—, —C6H4—S—C6H4—O— and other thermally stable substantially-aromatic difunctional groups known in the art of engineering thermoplastics. Also included are the so called modified polysulfones where the individual aromatic rings are further substituted in one or substituents including
wherein R is independently at each occurrence, a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom or a hydrocarbon group or a combination thereof. The halogen atom includes fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine atoms. The hydrocarbon group includes, for example, a C1-C20 alkyl group, a C2-C20 alkenyl group, a C3-C20 cycloalkyl group, a C3-C20 cycloalkenyl group, and a C6-C20 aromatic hydrocarbon group. These hydrocarbon groups may be partly substituted by a halogen atom or atoms, or may be partly substituted by a polar group or groups other than the halogen atom or atoms. As specific examples of the C1-C20 alkyl group, there can be mentioned methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, amyl, hexyl, octyl, decyl and dodecyl groups. As specific examples of the C2-C20 alkenyl group, there can be mentioned propenyl, isopropepyl, butenyl, isobutenyl, pentenyland hexenyl groups. As specific examples of the C3-C20 cycloalkyl group, there can be mentionedcyclopentyl and cyclohexyl groups. As specific examples of the C3-C20 cycloalkenyl group, there can be mentioned cyclopentenyl and cyclohexenyl groups. As specific examples of the aromatic hydrocarbon group, there can be mentioned phenyl and naphthyl groups or a combination thereof.
Individual preferred polymers, include, the polysulfone made by condensation polymerization of bisphenol A and 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone in the presence of base, and having the main repeating structure
having the abbreviation PSF and sold under the tradenames Udel®, Ultrason® S, Eviva®, RTP PSU, the polysulfone made by condensation polymerization of 4,4′-dihydroxydiphenyl and 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone in the presence of base, and having the main repeating structure
having the abbreviation PPSF and sold under the tradenames RADEL® resin; and a condensation polymer made from 4,4′-dichlorodiphenyl sulfone in the presence of base and having the principle repeating structure
having the abbreviation PPSF and sometimes called a “polyether sulfone” and sold under the tradenames Ultrason® E, LNP™, Veradel® PESU, Sumikaexce, and VICTREX® resin, and any and all combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, a composite material, such as a carbon composite, made of a composite including multiple plies or layers of a fibrous material (e.g., graphite, or carbon fiber including turbostratic or graphitic carbon fiber or a hybrid structure with both graphitic and turbostratic parts present. Examples of some of these composite materials for use in the metalwood golf clubs and their fabrication procedures are described in U.S. Reissue Pat. No. RE 41,577; U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,267,620; 7,140,974; 8,096,897; 7,628,712; 7,985,146; 7,874,936; 7,874,937; 8,628,434; and 7,874,938; and U.S. Patent Pub. Nos. 2008/0149267 and 2009/0163289, which are all incorporated herein by reference. The composite material may be manufactured according to the methods described at least in U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2008/0149267, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Alternatively, short or long fiber-reinforced formulations of the previously referenced polymers. Exemplary formulations include a Nylon 6/6 polyamide formulation which is 30% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 285. The material has a Tensile Strength of 35000 psi (241 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 638; a Tensile Elongation of 2.0-3.0% as measured by ASTM D 638; a Tensile Modulus of 3.30×106 psi (22754 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 638; a Flexural Strength of 50000 psi (345 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 790; and a Flexural Modulus of 2.60×106 psi (17927 MPa) as measured by ASTM D 790.
Also included is a polyphthalamide (PPA) formulation which is 40% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 4087 UP. This material has a Tensile Strength of 360 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1.4% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 41500 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 580 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 34500 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Also included is a polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) formulation which is 30% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 1385 UP. This material has a Tensile Strength of 255 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1.3% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 28500 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 385 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 23,000 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
An example is a polysulfone (PSU) formulation which is 20% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 983. This material has a Tensile Strength of 124 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 2% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 11032 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 186 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 9653 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Another example is a polysulfone (PSU) formulation which is 30% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 985. This material has a Tensile Strength of 138 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1.2% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 20685 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 193 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 12411 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
Also an option is a polysulfone (PSU) formulation which is 40% Carbon Fiber Filled and available commercially from RTP Company under the trade name RTP 987. This material has a Tensile Strength of 155 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Elongation of 1% as measured by ISO 527; a Tensile Modulus of 24132 MPa as measured by ISO 527; a Flexural Strength of 241 MPa as measured by ISO 178; and a Flexural Modulus of 19306 MPa as measured by ISO 178.
The foregoing materials are well-suited for composite, polymer and insert components of the embodiments disclosed herein, as distinguished from components which preferably are made of metal or metal alloys.
Additional details regarding providing composite soles and/or crowns and crown layups are provided in U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2016/0001146, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
As described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,623,378, filed Jun. 11, 2001, entitled “METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AND GOLF CLUB HEAD” and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, the crown or outer shell of the golf club head 100 may be made of a composite material, such as, for example, a carbon fiber reinforced epoxy, carbon fiber reinforced polymer, or a polymer. Additionally, U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2004/0116207 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,969,326, also incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, describe golf club heads with lightweight crowns. Furthermore, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/974,437 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,608,591), also incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, describes golf club heads with lightweight crowns and soles.
In some embodiments, composite materials used to construct the crown and/or sole insert should exhibit high strength and rigidity over a broad temperature range as well as good wear and abrasion behavior and be resistant to stress cracking. Such properties include (1) a Tensile Strength at room temperature of from about 7 ksi to about 330 ksi, preferably of from about 8 ksi to about 305 ksi, more preferably of from about 200 ksi to about 300 ksi, even more preferably of from about 250 ksi to about 300 ksi (as measured by ASTM D 638 and/or ASTM D 3039); (2) a Tensile Modulus at room temperature of from about 0.4 Msi to about 23 Msi, preferably of from about 0.46 Msi to about 21 Msi, more preferably of from about 0.46 Msi to about 19 Msi (as measured by ASTM D 638 and/or ASTM D 3039); (3) a Flexural Strength at room temperature of from about 13 ksi to about 300 ksi, from about 14 ksi to about 290 ksi, more preferably of from about 50 ksi to about 285 ksi, even more preferably of from about 100 ksi to about 280 ksi (as measured by ASTM D 790); and (4) a Flexural Modulus at room temperature of from about 0.4 Msi to about 21 Msi, from about 0.5 Msi to about 20 Msi, more preferably of from about 10 Msi to about 19 Msi (as measured by ASTM D 790).
In certain embodiments, composite materials that are useful for making club-head components comprise a fiber portion and a resin portion. In general, the resin portion serves as a “matrix” in which the fibers are embedded in a defined manner. In a composite for club-heads, the fiber portion is configured as multiple fibrous layers or plies that are impregnated with the resin component. The fibers in each layer have a respective orientation, which is typically different from one layer to the next and precisely controlled. The usual number of layers for a striking face is substantial, e.g., forty or more. However, for a sole or crown, the number of layers can be substantially decreased to, e.g., three or more, four or more, five or more, six or more, examples of which will be provided below. During fabrication of the composite material, the layers (each comprising respectively oriented fibers impregnated in uncured or partially cured resin; each such layer being called a “prepreg” layer) are placed superposedly in a “lay-up” manner. After forming the prepreg lay-up, the resin is cured to a rigid condition. If interested a specific strength may be calculated by dividing the tensile strength by the density of the material. This is also known as the strength-to-weight ratio or strength/weight ratio.
In tests involving certain club-head configurations, composite portions formed of prepreg plies having a relatively low fiber areal weight (FAW) have been found to provide superior attributes in several areas, such as impact resistance, durability, and overall club performance. FAW is the weight of the fiber portion of a given quantity of prepreg, in units of g/m2. Crown and/or sole panels may be formed of plies of composite material having a fiber areal weight of between 20 g/m2 and 200 g/m2 and a density between about 1 g/cc and 2 g/cc. However, FAW values below 100 g/m2, and more desirably 75 g/m2 or less, can be particularly effective. A particularly suitable fibrous material for use in making prepreg plies is carbon fiber, as noted. More than one fibrous material can be used. In other embodiments, however, prepreg plies having FAW values below 70 g/m2 and above 100 g/m2 may be used. Generally, cost is the primary prohibitive factor in prepreg plies having FAW values below 70 g/m2.
In particular embodiments, multiple low-FAW prepreg plies can be stacked and still have a relatively uniform distribution of fiber across the thickness of the stacked plies. In contrast, at comparable resin-content (R/C, in units of percent) levels, stacked plies of prepreg materials having a higher FAW tend to have more significant resin-rich regions, particularly at the interfaces of adjacent plies, than stacked plies of low-FAW materials. Resin-rich regions tend to reduce the efficacy of the fiber reinforcement, particularly since the force resulting from golf-ball impact is generally transverse to the orientation of the fibers of the fiber reinforcement. The prepreg plies used to form the panels desirably comprise carbon fibers impregnated with a suitable resin, such as epoxy. An example carbon fiber is “34-700” carbon fiber (available from Grafil, Sacramento, Calif.), having a tensile modulus of 234 Gpa (34 Msi) and a tensile strength of 4500 Mpa (650 Ksi). Another Grafil fiber that can be used is “TR50S” carbon fiber, which has a tensile modulus of 240 Gpa (35 Msi) and a tensile strength of 4900 Mpa (710 ksi). Suitable epoxy resins are types “301” and “350” (available from Newport Adhesives and Composites, Irvine, Calif.). An exemplary resin content (R/C) is between 33% and 40%, preferably between 35% and 40%, more preferably between 36% and 38%.
Some of the embodiments of the golf club head 100 discussed throughout this application may include a separate crown, sole, and/or face that may be a composite, such as, for example, a carbon fiber reinforced epoxy, carbon fiber reinforced polymer, or a polymer crown, sole, and/or face. Alternatively, the crown, sole, and/or face may be made from a less dense material, such as, for example, Titanium or Aluminum. A portion of the crown may be cast from either steel (˜7.8-8.05 g/cm3) or titanium (˜4.43 g/cm3) while a majority of the crown may be made from a less dense material, such as for example, a material having a density of about 1.5 g/cm3 or some other material having a density less than about 4.43 g/cm3. In other words, the crown could be some other metal or a composite. Additionally or alternatively, the face may be welded in place rather than cast as part of the sole.
By making the crown, sole, and/or face out of a less dense material, it may allow for weight to be redistributed from the crown, sole, and/or face to other areas of the club head, such as, for example, low and forward and/or low and back. Both low and forward and low and back may be possible for club heads incorporating a front to back sliding weight track.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,119 discloses composite articles and methods for making composite articles, which disclosure is incorporated by reference herein in the entirety. U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,452,325 and 7,279,963 disclose various composite crown constructions that may be used for golf club heads, which disclosures are also incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. The techniques and layups described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,163,119; 9,452,325; and 7,279,963, incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, may be employed for constructing a composite crown panel, composite sole panel, composite toe panel located on the sole, and/or composite heel panel located on the sole.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,163,119 discloses the usual number of layers for a striking plate is substantial, e.g., fifty or more. However, improvements have been made in the art such that the layers may be decreased to between 30 and 50 layers. Additionally, for a panel located on the sole and/or crown the layers can be substantially decreased down to three, four, five, six, seven, or more layers.
Table 1 below provides examples of possible layups. These layups show possible crown and/or sole construction using unidirectional plies unless noted as woven plies. The construction shown is for a quasi-isotropic layup. A single layer ply has a thickness ranging from about 0.065 mm to about 0.080 mm for a standard FAW of 70 g/m2 with about 36% to about 40% resin content, however the crown and/or sole panels may be formed of plies of composite material having a fiber areal weight of between 20 g/m2 and 200 g/m2. The thickness of each individual ply may be altered by adjusting either the FAW or the resin content, and therefore the thickness of the entire layup may be altered by adjusting these parameters.
The Area Weight (AW) is calculated by multiplying the density times the thickness. For the plies shown above made from composite material the density is about 1.5 g/cm3 and for titanium the density is about 4.5 g/cm3. Depending on the material used and the number of plies the composite crown and/or sole thickness ranges from about 0.195 mm to about 0.9 mm, preferably from about 0.25 mm to about 0.75 mm, more preferably from about 0.3 mm to about 0.65 mm, even more preferably from about 0.36 mm to about 0.56 mm. It should be understood that although these ranges are given for both the crown and sole together it does not necessarily mean the crown and sole will have the same thickness or be made from the same materials. In certain embodiments, the sole may be made from either a titanium alloy or a steel alloy. Similarly, the main body of the golf club head 100 may be made from either a titanium alloy or a steel alloy. The titanium will typically range from 0.4 mm to about 0.9 mm, preferably from 0.4 mm to about 0.8 mm, more preferably from 0.4 mm to about 0.7 mm, even more preferably from 0.45 mm to about 0.6 mm. In some instances, the crown and/or sole may have non-uniform thickness, such as, for example varying the thickness between about 0.45 mm and about 0.55 mm.
A lot of discretionary mass may be freed up by using composite material in the crown and/or sole especially when combined with thin walled titanium construction (0.4 mm to 0.9 mm) in other parts of the golf club head 10. The thin walled titanium construction increases the manufacturing difficulty and ultimately fewer parts are cast at a time. In the past, 100+ golf club heads could be cast at a single time, however due to the thinner wall construction fewer golf club heads are cast per cluster to achieve the desired combination of high yield and low material usage.
An important strategy for obtaining more discretionary mass is to reduce the wall thickness of the golf club head 10. For a typical titanium-alloy “metal-wood” club-head having a volume of 460 cm3 (i.e., a driver) and a crown area of 100 cm2, the thickness of the crown is typically about 0.8 mm, and the mass of the crown is about 36 g. Thus, reducing the wall thickness by 0.2 mm (e.g., from 1 mm to 0.8 mm) can yield a discretionary mass “savings” of 9.0 g.
The following examples will help to illustrate the possible discretionary mass “savings” by making a composite crown rather than a titanium-alloy crown. For example, reducing the material thickness to about 0.73 mm yields an additional discretionary mass “savings” of about 25.0 g over a 0.8 mm titanium-alloy crown. For example, reducing the material thickness to about 0.73 mm yields an additional discretionary mass “savings” of about 25 g over a 0.8 mm titanium-alloy crown or 34 g over a 1.0 mm titanium-alloy crown. Additionally, a 0.6 mm composite crown yields an additional discretionary mass “savings” of about 27 g over a 0.8 mm titanium-alloy crown. Moreover, a 0.4 mm composite crown yields an additional discretionary mass “savings” of about 30 g over a 0.8 mm titanium-alloy crown. The crown can be made even thinner yet to achieve even greater weight savings, for example, about 0.32 mm thick, about 0.26 mm thick, about 0.195 mm thick. However, the crown thickness must be balanced with the overall durability of the crown during normal use and misuse. For example, an unprotected crown i.e. one without a head cover could potentially be damaged from colliding with other woods or irons in a golf bag.
For example, any of the embodiments disclosed herein may have a crown or sole insert formed of plies of composite material having a fiber areal weight of between 20 g/m2 and 200 g/m2, preferably between 50 g/m2 and 100 g/m2, the weight of the composite crown being at least 20% less than the weight of a similar sized piece formed of the metal of the body. The composite crown may be formed of at least four plies of uni-tape standard modulus graphite, the plies of uni-tape oriented at any combination of 0° (forward to rearward of the club head), +45°, −45° and 90° (heelward to toeward of the golf club head). Additionally or alternatively, the crown may include an outermost layer of a woven graphite cloth. Carbon crown panels or inserts or carbon sole panels as disclosed herein and in the incorporated applications may be utilized with any of the embodiments herein, and may have a thickness between 0.40 mm to 1.0 mm, preferably 0.40 mm to 0.80 mm, more preferably 0.40 mm to 0.65 mm, and a density between 1 gram per cubic centimeter and 2 grams per cubic centimeter, though other thicknesses and densities are also possible.
One potential embodiment of a carbon sole panel that may be utilized with any of the embodiments herein weighs between 1.0 grams and 5.0 grams, such as between 1.25 grams and 2.75 grams, such as between 3.0 grams and 4.5 grams. In other embodiments, the carbon sole panel may weigh less than 3.0 grams, such as less than 2.5 grams, such as less than 2.0 grams, such as less than 1.75 grams. The carbon sole panel may have a surface area of at least 1250 mm2, 1500 mm2, 1750 mm2, or 2000 mm2.
One potential embodiment of a carbon crown panel that may be utilized with any of the embodiments herein weighs between 3.0 grams and 8.0 grams, such as between 3.5 grams and 7.0 grams, such as between 3.5 grams and 7.0 grams. In other embodiments, the carbon crown panel may weigh less than 7.0 grams, such as less than 6.5 grams, such as less than 6.0 grams, such as less than 5.5 grams, such as less than 5.0 grams, such as less than 4.5 grams. The carbon crown panel may have a surface area of at least 3000 mm2, 3500 mm2, 3750 mm2, 4000 mm2.
As already discussed, and making reference to the embodiment illustrated in
During development, it was discovered that a ratio of COR feature length to the offset distance may be preferably greater than 4, and even more preferably greater than 5, and most preferably greater than 5.5. However, the ratio of COR feature length to offset distance also has an upper limit and is preferably less than 15, and even more preferably less than 14, and most preferably less than 13.5. For example, for a COR feature length of 30 mm the offset distance from the face would preferably be less than 7.5 mm, and even more preferably 6 mm or less from the face. Additional disclosure about the relationship between COR feature length and offset, and related effects are provided in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/859,071, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The offset distance is highly dependent on the slot length. As slot length increases so do the stresses in the club head, as a result the offset distance must be increased to manage stress. Additionally, as slot length increases the first mode frequency is negatively impacted.
Exemplary embodiments of the structure of the weight channel 130 are further described herein. As best illustrated in
The rearward edge 134 of the weight channel may drop down to a lower channel surface 131 that is raised up from the sole of the golf club. Lower channel surface 131 may be substantially parallel to, or as illustrated, slightly angled away from the sole 103 of the golf club head, so that the weight channel 130 may be deeper at the forward edge 132 than it is at the rearward edge 134. As illustrated in
In certain embodiments, this compressible material may comprise an elastically compressible material that can be compressed down to, e.g., less than 90% of its original uncompressed thickness, down to less than 50% of its original uncompressed thickness, down to less than 20% of its original uncompressed thickness, or, in particular embodiments, down to less than 10% of its original uncompressed thickness, while typically being able to rebound substantially to its uncompressed thickness upon removal of a compression force. In some embodiments, the material may be compressed down to less than 50% of its original uncompressed thickness when a compression force is applied and rebound to more than 90% of its original uncompressed thickness upon removal of the compression force.
The following table provides examples A-I showing an example initial uncompressed material depth, a final compressed material depth, the delta between the uncompressed and compressed material depths, and the percent the material was compressed. In this example, an uncompressed depth of 1.5 mm is used, however this is purely an example and several other depths could be used for the compressible material within indentation 176, ranging from about 0.25 mm to about 5 mm, preferably from about 0.5 mm to about 3.5 mm, more preferably from about 0.8 mm to about 2.0 mm depending on the application.
The percent the material is compressed is calculated by subtracting the initial uncompressed thickness from the final compressed thickness, dividing the result by the initial uncompressed shim thickness, and finally multiplying by 100 percent. See Equation 3 below for further clarification. The equation yields a negative percent change because the shim is being compressed i.e. the final thickness is less than the uncompressed shim thickness.
Percent Change=100%*(Tfinal−Tinitial)/Tinitial (3)
Additionally or alternatively, the percent change could also be expressed as an absolute percent change along with the word compression or tension to indicate the sign. In tensions the sign is positive and in compression the sign is negative. For example, a material that is compressed at least 10% is the same as a shim that has a percent change of at least −10%.
Additional disclosure regarding the use of compressible material is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 9,868,036, issued on Jan. 16, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Within lower channel surface 131 is positioned a fastener port 152. The fastener port 152 may be configured to receive a fastener 150. As such, fastener port 152 may be threaded so that fastener 150 can be loosened or tightened either to allow movement of, or to secure in position, weight member 140, as further described herein. The fastener may comprise a head 151 with which a tool (not shown) may be used to tighten or loosen the fastener, and a fastener body 153 that may, e.g., be threaded to interact with corresponding threads on the fastener port 152 to facilitate tightening or loosening the fastener 150. The fastener port 152 can have any of a number of various configurations to receive and/or retain any of a number of fasteners, which may comprise simple threaded fasteners, such as described below, or which may comprise removable weights or weight assemblies, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,773,360, 7,166,040, 7,452,285, 7,628,707, 7,186,190, 7,591,738, 7,963,861, 7,621,823, 7,448,963, 7,568,985, 7,578,753, 7,717,804, 7,717,805, 7,530,904, 7,540,811, 7,407,447, 7,632,194, 7,846,041, 7,419,441, 7,713,142, 7,744,484, 7,223,180, 7,410,425 and 7,410,426, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein. As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The weight member 140, which may comprise a steel weight member or other suitable material, has a length 147 (as illustrated in
In the illustrated example shown in
As shown in
As illustrated in
The golf club head is removably attached to the shaft by shaft sleeve 302 (which is mounted to the lower end portion of a golf club shaft (not shown)) by inserting the shaft sleeve 302 into the hosel bore 163 and a hosel insert 164 (which is mounted inside the hosel bore 163), and inserting a screw 310 (or other suitable fixation device) upwardly through a recessed port 166 in the sole 103 and, in the illustrated embodiment, tightening the screw 310 into a threaded opening of the shaft sleeve 302, thereby securing the golf club head to the shaft sleeve 302. A screw capturing device, such as in the form of an O-ring or washer 312, can be placed on the shaft of the screw 310 to retain the screw in place within the golf club head when the screw is loosened to permit removal of the shaft from the golf club head.
The recessed port 166 extends from the bottom portion of the golf club head into the interior of the outer shell toward the top portion of the golf club head 200 at the location of hosel 162, as seen in
The shaft sleeve 302 has a lower portion 306 including splines that mate with mating splines of the hosel insert 164, an intermediate portion 308 and an upper head portion 314. The intermediate portion 308 and the upper head portion 314 define an internal bore 316 for receiving the tip end portion of the shaft 300. In the illustrated embodiment, the intermediate portion 308 of the shaft sleeve has a cylindrical external surface that is concentric with the inner cylindrical surface of the hosel bore 163. As described in more detail in U.S. Patent Application Pub. No. 2010/0197424, which is hereby incorporated by reference, inserting the shaft sleeve 302 at different angular positions relative to the hosel insert 164 is effective to adjust the shaft loft and/or the lie angle. For example, the loft angle may be increased or decreased by various degrees, depending on the angular position, such as +/−1.5 degrees, +/−2.0 degrees, or +/−2.5 degrees. Other loft angle adjustments are also possible.
In the embodiment shown, because the intermediate portion 308 is concentric with the hosel bore 163, the outer surface of the intermediate portion 308 can contact the adjacent surface of the hosel bore 163, as depicted in
In certain embodiments, the golf club head may be attached to the shaft via a removable head-shaft connection assembly as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,431, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. Further in certain embodiments, the golf club head may also incorporate features that provide the golf club heads and/or golf clubs with the ability not only to replaceably connect the shaft to the head but also to adjust the loft and/or the lie angle of the club by employing a removable head-shaft connection assembly. Such an adjustable lie/loft connection assembly is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,025,587; 8,235,831; 8,337,319; 8,758,153; 8,398,503; 8,876,622; 8,496,541; and 9,033,821, the entire contents of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
Similar to weight channel 130, weight channel 430 is configured to define a path 437 for and to at least partially contain adjustable weight member 440 that is both configured to translate along the path 437 and sized to be slidably retained, or at least partially retained, within the footprint of the weight channel 430 by fastener 450. Fastener 450 may be removable, and may comprise a screw, bolt, or other suitable device for fastening as described herein and in the incorporated applications. Fastener may be moved between or among the fastener ports 452 to further adjust mass properties of the golf club head 400. Fastener 450 may extend through an elongated weight slot 454 passing through the body of the weight member 440. Weight slot 454 may extend through weight member 440 from a lower surface 441 of the weight member that is substantially parallel to the sole 403—and may serve as an additional ground contact point when the golf club head is soled—through an upper surface 445 of the weight member that is positioned against the lower channel surface 431 of the weight channel and into a fastener port 452 in the weight channel 430. The weight member 440 is positioned within the weight channel 430 and may have a greater height at a forward side 442 than at a rearward side 444, and may taper down from the forward side 442 to the rearward side 444. In particular cases, the weight member 440 may be configured so that the center of mass is positioned closer to the forward side 442 than to the rearward side 444. In the illustrated example, this is aided by the fact that the weight slot 454 and fastener 450 are positioned at the rearward side 444 of the weight member, such that the rearward side 444 of the weight member at least partially surrounds weight slot 454. The weight slot may further comprise an interior fastener ledge 455 to support the head 451 of fastener 450. In the illustrated example, this fastener ledge is coextensive with much of the rearward side 444 of the weight member 440, and the rearward side of the weight member curves around to bound the fastener 450 at a forward edge 457, at a heelward end 456, and at a toeward end 458 of the weight slot 454. In the illustrated example, the rearward edge 434 of weight channel 430 bounds the fastener 450 to the rear, and may comprise a ledge 474 (as shown in
Similar to weight channel 130, weight channel 630 is configured to define a path 637 for and to at least partially contain adjustable weight member 640 that is both configured to translate along the path 637 and sized to be slidably retained, or at least partially retained, within the footprint of the weight channel 630 by fastener 650. The path 637 may run the length of the weight channel 630, or may, in some embodiments, comprise only a portion of the weight channel 630. Fastener 650 may be removable, and may comprise a screw, bolt, or other suitable device for fastening as described herein and in the incorporated applications. Fastener 650 may extend through an elongated weight slot 654 passing through the body of the weight member 640. Weight slot 654 may extend through weight member 640 from a lower surface 641 of the weight member that is substantially parallel to the sole 603—and may serve as an additional ground contact point when the golf club head is soled—through an upper surface of the weight member (not shown) that is positioned against the lower channel surface 631 of the weight channel and into the fastener port in the weight channel 630. The weight slot may further comprise an interior fastener ledge (not shown) to support the head 651 of fastener 650. The weight member may have additional discretionary mass positioned proximate to its ends, such as within a first discretionary mass portion positioned at a heelward end 646 and a second discretionary mass portion positioned at a toeward end 648. The weight slot may further comprise an interior fastener ledge (not shown) to support the head 651 of fastener 650. Alternatively, the lower surface 641 of the portion of weight member 640 containing the weight slot may be slightly recessed between heelward end 646 and toeward end 648 so that the head 651 of the fastener 650 is lower than, or no higher than, or substantially similar in height to the remainder of the lower surface 641 of the weight member, as described further herein. When tightened, the fastener 650 retains the weight member 640 in place. When fastener 650 is loosened, the fastener may be configured to remain stationary relative to the fastener port 652, while the position of the weight member 640 may be adjusted. In the illustrated example, weight member 640 may be translated laterally along the path 637 in a heelward or toeward direction to adjust, for example, golf club center of gravity movement along an x-axis (CGx), such as to control left or right tendency of a golf swing.
Weight member 640 may have a mass that is between 10 to 50 grams, or in some particular instances, a mass that is above 10 grams, or a mass that is below 40 grams, or a mass in the range of 12 to 38 grams.
Within lower channel surface 731 is positioned at least one fastener port (not shown)—which may be similar to the fastener ports described herein and in the incorporated patents and/or applications—that may be configured to receive a fastener 750. The fastener may comprise a head 751 with which a tool (not shown) may be used to tighten or loosen the fastener, and a fastener body (not shown) that may, e.g., be threaded to interact with corresponding threads on the fastener port to facilitate tightening or loosening the fastener 750.
Similar to weight channel 130, weight channel 730 is configured to define a path 737 for and to at least partially contain adjustable weight member 740 that is both configured to translate along the path 737 and sized to be slidably retained, or at least partially retained, within the footprint of the weight channel 730 by fastener 750. In the illustrated embodiment, the path 737 may run the length of the weight channel 730, or may, in some embodiments, comprise only a portion of the weight channel 730. Fastener 750 may be removable, and may comprise a screw, bolt, or other suitable device for fastening as described herein and in the incorporated patents and applications. Fastener 750 may extend through an elongated weight slot 754 passing through the body of the weight member 740. Weight slot 754 may extend through weight member 740 from a lower surface 741 of the weight member that is substantially parallel to the sole 703—and may serve as an additional ground contact point when the golf club head is soled—through an upper surface of the weight member (not shown) that is positioned against the lower channel surface 731 of the weight channel and into the fastener port in the weight channel 730. The weight member may have additional discretionary mass positioned proximate to its ends, such as within a first discretionary mass portion positioned at a heelward end 746 and a second discretionary mass portion positioned at a toeward end 748. The weight slot may further comprise an interior fastener ledge (not shown) to support the head 751 of fastener 750. Alternatively, the portion of the lower surface 641 of the portion of weight member 740 containing the weight slot may be slightly recessed between heelward end 746 and toeward end 748 so that the head 751 of fastener 750 is lower than, or no higher than, or substantially similar in height to the remainder of the lower surface 741 of the weight member, as described further herein. When tightened, the fastener 750 retains the weight member 740 in place. When fastener 750 is loosened, the fastener may be configured to remain stationary relative to the fastener port 752, while the position of the weight member 740 may be adjusted. In the illustrated example, weight member 740 may be translated laterally along the path 737 in a heelward or toeward direction to adjust, for example, golf club center of gravity movement along an x-axis (CGx), such as to control left or right tendency of a golf swing.
Weight member 740 may have a mass that is between 10 to 50 grams, or in some particular instances, a mass that is above 10 grams, or a mass that is below 40 grams, or a mass in the range of 12 to 38 grams.
In some embodiments, the weight member 800 may be formed from a single piece of material, such as by casting, injection molding, machining, or other suitable methods, with first end portion 846 and the second end portion 848 formed to have a greater thickness than the middle portion 840. In other embodiments, additional material, such as additional layers of material, or additional discretionary mass elements may be added to the first end portion 846 and/or the second end portion 848 to add additional mass to the ends. In particular embodiments, this may be achieved by welding an additional thickness of mass to the weight member 800 at one or both of the ends. It is to be understood, however, that additional mass could be added by other methods, such as bolting, adhering, or braising additional mass, or by introducing removable discretionary mass elements, such as described herein.
In some embodiments, weight member 800 may be formed of a first material, such as titanium. In other embodiments, steel, tungsten or another suitable material or combination of materials may be used. In particular embodiments, higher density materials may be used in certain portions of the weight member 800 to add additional mass, such as, e.g., at first end portion 846 and/or second end portion 848. For example, steel or tungsten or other suitable higher density materials could be used at first end portion 846 and the second end portion 848 to add additional discretionary mass to the ends of the weight member 800 relative to the middle portion 840, or additional higher density elements, e.g., plates, could be added at first end portion 846 and/or second end portion 848 to add additional discretionary mass.
“Split mass” configurations such as those described herein potentially allow for several high MOI positions and allow greater weight to be moved to the outside of the club head while minimizing the overall weight added to the club head. Additionally, providing the added weight along the perimeter of the golf club may have additional benefits for maximizing MOI. And, providing a curved shape weight member, combined with a split mass configuration as described herein also may provide for additional mass to be positioned more forward than in a configuration without a split mass configuration, which provides improved CG projection. Additionally, providing the slidable rear weight as illustrated in
The fastener may comprise a head 951 with which a tool (not shown) may be used to tighten or loosen the fastener, and a fastener body 953 that may, e.g., be threaded to interact with corresponding threads on the fastener port 952 to facilitate tightening or loosening the fastener 950. Further, fastener 950 is configured to retain a discretionary mass element between the lower surface 941 of the weight member 940 and the head of the fastener 950, such as first discretionary mass element 946 positioned at a first end (such as a heelward end) of the weight member 940 and second discretionary mass element 948 positioned at a second end (such as a toeward end) of the weight member 940. Discretionary mass elements 946 and 948 may further contain internal apertures, portions of which may be threaded to interact with threads on the fastener body 953 and other portions which may or may not be threaded and are configured to retain some or all of the fastener head 951.
In some embodiments, weight member 900 may be formed of a first material, such as titanium. In other embodiments, steel, tungsten or another suitable material or combination of materials may be used. In particular embodiments, higher density materials may be used in certain portions of the weight member 900 to add additional mass. For example, steel or tungsten or other suitable higher density materials could be used, e.g., in discretionary mass elements 946 and 948 or in fasteners 950 to add additional discretionary mass to the ends of the weight member 900.
In some embodiments, weight member 1000 may be formed of a first material, such as titanium. In other embodiments, steel, tungsten or another suitable material or combination of materials may be used. In particular embodiments, higher density materials may be used in certain portions of the weight member 1000 to add additional mass. For example, steel or tungsten or other suitable higher density materials could be used, e.g., in fasteners 1050 or for forming them in or adhering them to the ends of the weight member, such as in the manner further described above and in the incorporated patents and applications, to add additional discretionary mass to the ends of the weight member 1000.
Similar to weight channel 130, weight channel 1130 is configured to define a path 1137 for and to at least partially contain adjustable weight member 1140 that is both configured to translate along the path 1137 and sized to be slidably retained, or at least partially retained, within the footprint of the weight channel 1130 by fastener assembly 1160. Unlike the previous examples, which relied on fasteners passing through at least a portion of the weight member, golf club head 1100 comprises a fastener assembly 1160 comprising a fastener tab 1165 that may extend from a rear ground contact surface 1118 proximate to the rear end 1110 of the golf club head to a weight overhang or ledge 1174 that may at least partially cover the weight member 1140, such as its rearward side 1144, as best illustrated in
As illustrated in
When tightened, the removable fastener 1150 presses down on fastener tab 1165 so that the ledge 1174 retains the weight member 1140 in place. Once removable fastener 1150 is loosened, the fastener is configured to remain stationary relative to the fastener port 1152, while the position of the weight member 1140 may be adjusted relative to the fastener port. In the illustrated example shown in
Design Parameters for Golf Club Heads with Slidably Repositionable Weight(s)
Although the following discussion cites features related to golf club head 100 and its variations (e.g. 400, 500, 1100), the many design parameters discussed below substantially apply to golf club heads 600 and 700 due to the common features of the club heads. With that in mind, in some embodiments of the golf clubs described herein, the location, position or orientation of features of the golf club head, such as the golf club head 100, 400, 500, 600, 700 and 1100, can be referenced in relation to fixed reference points, e.g., a golf club head origin, other feature locations or feature angular orientations. The location or position of a weight or weight assembly, such as the weight member 140, 440, 640, 740, and 1140 is typically defined with respect to the location or position of the weight's or weight assembly's center of gravity. When a weight or weight assembly is used as a reference point from which a distance, i.e., a vectorial distance (defined as the length of a straight line extending from a reference or feature point to another reference or feature point) to another weight or weight assembly location is determined, the reference point is typically the center of gravity of the weight or weight assembly.
The location of the weight assembly on a golf club head can be approximated by its coordinates on the head origin coordinate system. The head origin coordinate system includes an origin at the ideal impact location of the golf club head, which is disposed at the geometric center of the striking surface 105 (see
As described above, in some of the embodiments of the golf club head 100 described herein, the weight channel 130 extends generally from a heelward end 136 oriented toward the heel side 106 of the golf club head to a toeward end 138 oriented toward the toe side 108 of the golf club head, with both the heelward end 136 and toeward end 138 being at or near the same distance from the front portion of the club head. As a result, in these embodiments, the weight member 140 that is slidably retained within the weight channel 130 is capable of a relatively large amount of adjustment in the direction of the x-axis, while having a relatively small amount of adjustment in the direction of the y-axis. In some alternative embodiments, the heelward end 136 and toeward end 138 may be located at varying distances from the front portion, such as having the heelward end 136 further rearward than the toeward end 138, or having the toeward end 138 further rearward than the heelward end 136. In these alternative embodiments, the weight member 140 that is slidably retained within the weight channel 130 is capable of a relatively large amount of adjustment in the direction of the x-axis, while also having from a small amount to a larger amount of adjustment in the direction of the y-axis.
For example, in some embodiments of a golf club head 100 having a weight member 140 that is adjustably positioned within a weight channel 130, the weight member 140 can have an origin x-axis coordinate between about −40 mm and about 40 mm, depending upon the location of the weight assembly within the weight channel 130. In specific embodiments, the weight member 140 can have an origin x-axis coordinate between about −35 mm and about 35 mm, or between about −30 mm and about 30 mm, or between about −25 mm and about 25 mm, or between about −20 mm and about 20 mm, or between about −15 mm and about 15 mm, or between about −13 mm and about 13 mm. Thus, in some embodiments, the weight member 140 is provided with a maximum x-axis adjustment range (Max Δx) that is less than 80 mm, such as less than 70 mm, such as less than 60 mm, such as less than 50 mm, such as less than 40 mm, such as less than 30 mm, such as less than 26 mm.
On the other hand, in some embodiments of the golf club head 100 having a weight member 140 that is adjustably positioned within a weight channel 130, the weight member 140 can have an origin y-axis coordinate between about 5 mm and about 80 mm. More specifically, in certain embodiments, the weight member 140 can have an origin y-axis coordinate between about 5 mm and about 50 mm, between about 5 mm and about 45 mm, or between about 5 mm and about 40 mm, or between about 10 mm and about 40 mm, or between about 5 mm and about 35 mm. Additionally or alternatively, in certain embodiments, the weight member 140 can have an origin y-axis coordinate between about 35 mm and about 80 mm, between about 45 mm and about 75 mm, or between about 50 mm and about 70 mm. Thus, in some embodiments, the weight member 140 is provided with a maximum y-axis adjustment range (Max Δy) that is less than 45 mm, such as less than 30 mm, such as less than 20 mm, such as less than 10 mm, such as less than 5 mm, such as less than 3 mm. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments having a rearward channel, the weight member is provided with a maximum y-axis adjustment range (Max Δy) that is less than 110 mm, such as less than 80 mm, such as less than 60 mm, such as less than 40 mm, such as less than 30 mm, such as less than 15 mm.
In some embodiments, a golf club head can be configured to have a constraint relating to the relative distances that the weight assembly can be adjusted in the origin x-direction and origin y-direction. Such a constraint can be defined as the maximum y-axis adjustment range (Max Δy) divided by the maximum x-axis adjustment range (Max Δx). According to some embodiments, the value of the ratio of (Max Δy)/(Max Δx) is between 0 and about 0.8. In specific embodiments, the value of the ratio of (Max Δy)/(Max Δx) is between 0 and about 0.5, or between 0 and about 0.2, or between 0 and about 0.15, or between 0 and about 0.10, or between 0 and about 0.08, or between 0 and about 0.05, or between 0 and about 0.03, or between 0 and about 0.01.
As discussed above, in some driver-type golf club head embodiments, the mass of the weight member, e.g. weight member 640 and/or weight member 740, is between about 1 g and about 50 g, such as between about 3 g and about 40 g, such as between about 5 g and about 25 g. In some alternative embodiments, the mass of the weight member 640 and/or 740 is between about 5 g and about 45 g, such as between about 9 g and about 35 g, such as between about 9 g and about 30 g, such as between about 9 g and about 25 g.
As discussed above, in some fairway-type golf club head embodiments, the mass of the weight member, e.g., weight member 140, is between about 50 g and about 90 g, such as between about 55 g and about 80 g, such as between about 60 g and about 75 g. In some alternative embodiments, the mass of the weight member 140 is between about 5 g and about 45 g, such as between about 9 g and about 35 g, such as between about 9 g and about 30 g, such as between about 9 g and about 25 g.
In some embodiments, a golf club head can be configured to have constraints relating to the product of the mass of the weight assembly and the relative distances that the weight assembly can be adjusted in the origin x-direction and/or origin y-direction. One such constraint can be defined as the mass of the weight assembly (MWA) multiplied by the maximum x-axis adjustment range (Max Δx). According to some embodiments, the value of the product of MWA×(Max Δx) is between about 250 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm. In specific embodiments, the value of the product of MWA×(Max Δx) is between about 500 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 1000 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 1500 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 2000 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 2500 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 3000 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 3500 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm, or between about 4000 g·mm and about 4950 g·mm.
According to some embodiments, the value of the product of MWA×(Max Δx) is between about 250 g·mm and about 2500 g·mm. In specific embodiments, the value of the product of MWA×(Max Δx) is between about 350 g·mm and about 2400 g·mm, or between about 750 g·mm and about 2300 g·mm, or between about 1000 g·mm and about 2200 g·mm, or between about 1100 g·mm and about 2100 g·mm, or between about 1200 g·mm and about 2000 g·mm, or between about 1200 g·mm and about 1950 g·mm, or between about 1250 g·mm and about 1900 g·mm, or between about 1250 g·mm and about 1750 g·mm.
Another constraint relating to the product of the mass of the weight assembly and the relative distances that the weight assembly can be adjusted in the origin x-direction and/or origin y-direction can be defined as the mass of the weight assembly (MWA) multiplied by the maximum y-axis adjustment range (Max Δy). According to some embodiments, the value of the product of MWA×(Max Δy) is between about 0 g·mm and about 1800 g·mm. In specific embodiments, the value of the product of MWA×(Max Δy) is between about 0 g·mm and about 1500 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 1000 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 500 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 250 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 150 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 100 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 50 g·mm, or between about 0 g·mm and about 25 g·mm.
As noted above, one advantage obtained with a golf club head having a repositionable weight, such as the golf club head 100 having the weight member 140, is in providing the end user of the golf club with the capability to adjust the location of the CG of the club head over a range of locations relating to the position of the repositionable weight. In particular, the present inventors have found that there is a distance advantage to providing a center of gravity of the club head that is lower and more forward relative to comparable golf clubs that do not include a weight assembly such as the weight member 140 described herein.
In some embodiments, the golf club head 100 has a CG with a head origin x-axis coordinate (CGx) between about −10 mm and about 10 mm, such as between about −4 mm and about 9 mm, such as between about −3 mm and about 8 mm, such as between about −2 mm to about 5 mm, such as between about −0.8 mm to about 8 mm, such as between about 0 mm to about 8 mm. In some embodiments, the golf club head 100 has a CG with a head origin y-axis coordinate (CGy) greater than about 15 mm and less than about 50 mm, such as between about 22 mm and about 43 mm, such as between about 24 mm and about 40 mm, such as between about 26 mm and about 35 mm. In some embodiments, the golf club head 100 has a CG with a head origin z-axis coordinate (CGz) greater than about −8 mm and less than about 3 mm, such as between about −6 mm and about 0 mm. In some embodiments, the golf club head 100 has a CG with a head origin z-axis coordinate (CGz) that is less than 0 mm, such as less than −2 mm, such as less than −4 mm, such as less than −5 mm, such as less than −6 mm.
As described herein, by repositioning the weight member 140 within the weight channel 130 of the golf club head 100, the location of the CG of the club head is adjusted. For example, in some embodiments of a golf club head 100 having a weight member 140 that is adjustably positioned within a weight channel 130, the club head is provided with a maximum CGx adjustment range (Max ΔCGx) attributable to the repositioning of the weight member 140 that is greater than 1 mm, such as greater than 2 mm, such as greater than 3 mm, such as greater than 4 mm, such as greater than 5 mm, such as greater than 6 mm, such as greater than 8 mm, such as greater than 10 mm, such as greater than 11 mm.
Moreover, in some embodiments of the golf club head 100 having a weight member 140 that is adjustably positioned within a weight channel 130, the club head is provided with a CGy adjustment range (Max ΔCGy) that is less than 6 mm, such as less than 3 mm, such as less than 1 mm, such as less than 0.5 mm, such as less than 0.25 mm, such as less than 0.1 mm.
Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments of the golf club head 100 having a weight member 140 that is adjustably positioned within a rearward channel, the club head is provided with a CGy adjustment range (Max ΔCGy) that is less than 10 mm, such as less than 5 mm, such as less than 3 mm, such as less than 1 mm, such as less than 0.5 mm, such as less than 0.25 mm, such as less than 0.1 mm.
In some embodiments, a golf club head can be configured to have a constraint relating to the relative amounts that the CG is able to be adjusted in the origin x-direction and origin y-direction. Such a constraint can be defined as the maximum CGy adjustment range (Max ΔCGy) divided by the maximum CGx adjustment range (Max ΔCGx). According to some embodiments, the value of the ratio of (Max ΔCGy)/(Max ΔCGx) is between 0 and about 0.8. In specific embodiments, the value of the ratio of (Max ΔCGy)/(Max ΔCGx) is between 0 and about 0.5, or between 0 and about 0.2, or between 0 and about 0.15, or between 0 and about 0.10, or between 0 and about 0.08, or between 0 and about 0.05, or between 0 and about 0.03, or between 0 and about 0.01.
In some embodiments, a golf club head can be configured such that only one of the above constraints apply. In other embodiments, a golf club head can be configured such that more than one of the above constraints apply. In still other embodiments, a golf club head can be configured such that all of the above constraints apply.
Table 3 below lists various properties of an exemplary golf club head, which may be similar to golf club head 100, having a weight assembly retained within a front channel.
Table 4 below lists various properties of an exemplary golf club head, which may be similar to golf club head 100, having a weight assembly retained within a front channel, and located at center, toe, and heel positions, respectively:
In table 4 above, BP Delta or Balance Point Up Delta represents the change in the Balance Point Up relative to the Balance Point Up when the weight is in the center position. For example, when the weight is in toewardmost position the Balance Point Up is 19.684 mm compared to 19.532 mm in the center position resulting in a delta or change of 0.152 mm. Similarly, in the heel position the BP Delta is 0.200 mm (19.732 mm-19.532 mm). BP Delta/CGx Delta (mm/mm) is again calculated relative to the center position. For example, BP Delta for the heelwardmost position relative to center is 0.200 mm and the CGx delta from center to heel is 2.5 mm (5.3 mm-2.8 mm) resulting in a ratio of 0.08. It was found that this track configuration produced a very large CGx movement with very little impact to Balance Point Up, which was lacking in earlier designs.
In some embodiments described herein, BP Delta in a toewardmost position is no more than 0.50 mm, and is between 0.12 mm and 0.50 mm, such as between 0.13 mm and 0.40 mm, such as between 0.14 mm and 0.30 mm. In some embodiments described herein, BP Delta in a heelwardmost position is no more than 0.30 mm, and is between 0.12 mm and 0.30 mm, such as between 0.13 mm and 0.25 mm, such as between 0.15 mm and 0.25 mm.
In some embodiments described herein, a BP Delta/CGx Delta (mm/mm) when the weight is in the toewardmost position is no more than 0.170 (absolute value). More specifically, the BP Delta/CGx Delta for the toewardmost position relative the center position can be between 0.170 (absolute value) and 0.040 (absolute value). In some embodiments described herein, a BP Delta/CGx Delta (mm/mm) when the weight is in the heelwardmost position is no more than 0.120 (absolute value). More specifically, the BP Delta/CGx Delta for the heelwardmost position relative the center position can be between 0.120 (absolute value) and 0.060 (absolute value). In some embodiments described herein, the summation of the BP Delta/CGx Delta (mm/mm) in the toewardmost position (absolute value) and the BP Delta/CGx Delta (mm/mm) in the heelwardmost position (absolute value) is no more than 0.29, and is between 0.11 and 0.29, such as between 0.12 and 0.28, such as between 0.13 and 0.25. Unexpectedly, the location of the weight bearing channel in the front portion of the club head can lead to synergies in golf club performance. First, because Δ1 (delta 1) is relatively small, dynamic lofting is reduced; thereby reducing spin that otherwise may reduce distance. Additionally, because the projection of the CG is below the center-face, the gear effect biases the golf ball to rotate toward the projection of the CG—or, in other words, with forward spin. This is countered by the loft of the golf club head imparting back spin. The overall effect is a relatively low spin profile. However, because the CG is below the center face (and, thereby, below the ideal impact location) as measured along the z-axis, the golf ball will tend to rise higher on impact. The result is a high launching but lower spinning golf shot on purely struck shots, which leads to better ball flight (higher and softer landing) with more distance due to less energy loss from spin.
The distance between weight channels/weight ports and weight size can contribute to the amount of CG change made possible in a golf club head, particularly in a golf club head used in conjunction with a removable sleeve assembly, as described above.
In some exemplary embodiments of a golf club head having two, three or four weights, a maximum weight mass multiplied by the distance between the maximum weight and the minimum weight is between about 100 g·mm and about 3,750 g·mm or about 200 g·mm and 2,000 g·mm. More specifically, in certain embodiments, the maximum weight mass multiplied by the weight separation distance is between about 500 g·mm and about 1,500 g·mm, between about 1,200 g·mm and about 1,400 g·mm.
When a weight or weight port is used as a reference point from which a distance, i.e., a vectorial distance (defined as the length of a straight line extending from a reference or feature point to another reference or feature point) to another weight or weights port is determined, the reference point is typically the volumetric centroid of the weight port. When a movable weight club head and sleeve assembly are combined, it is possible to achieve the highest level of club trajectory modification while simultaneously achieving the desired look of the club at address. For example, if a player prefers to have an open club face look at address, the player can put the club in the “R” or open face position. If that player then hits a fade (since the face is open) shot but prefers to hit a straight shot, or slight draw, it is possible to take the same club and move the heavy weight to the heel port to promote draw bias. Therefore, it is possible for a player to have the desired look at address (in this case open face) and the desired trajectory (in this case straight or slight draw).
In yet another advantage, by combining the movable weight concept with an adjustable sleeve position (effecting loft, lie and face angle) it is possible to amplify the desired trajectory bias that a player may be trying to achieve.
For example, if a player wants to achieve the most draw possible, the player can adjust the sleeve position to be in the closed face position or “L” position and also put the heavy weight in the heel port. The weight and the sleeve position work together to achieve the greater draw bias possible. On the other hand, to achieve the greatest fade bias, the sleeve position can be set for the open face or “R” position and the heavy weight is placed in the top port.
As described above, the combination of a large CG change (measured by the heaviest weight multiplied by the distance between the ports) and a large loft change (measured by the largest possible change in loft between two sleeve positions, Aloft) results in the highest level of trajectory adjustability. Thus, a product of the distance between at least two weight ports, the maximum weight, and the maximum loft change is important in describing the benefits achieved by the embodiments described herein.
In one embodiment, the product of the distance between at least two weight ports, the maximum weight, and the maximum loft change is between about 50 mm·g·deg and about 8,000 mm·g·deg, preferably between about 2000 mm·g·deg and about 6,000 mm·g·deg, more preferably between about 2500 mm·g·deg and about 4,500 mm·g·deg, or even more preferably between about 3000 mm·g·deg and about 4,100 mm·g·deg. In other words, in certain embodiments, the golf club head satisfies the following expressions in Equations 4-7. Notably, the maximum loft change may vary between 2-4 degrees, and the preferred embodiment having a maximum loft change of 4 degrees or +2 degrees.
50 mm·g·degrees<Dwp·Mhw·Aloft<8,000 mm·g·degrees (4)
2000 mm·g·degrees<Dwp·Mhw·Aloft<6,000 mm·g·degrees (5)
2500 mm·g·degrees<Dwp·Mhw·Aloft<4,500 mm·g·degrees (6)
3000 mm·g·degrees<Dwp·Mhw·Aloft<4,100 mm·g·degrees (7)
In the above expressions, Dwp, is the distance between two weight port centroids (mm), Mhw, is the mass of the heaviest weight (g), and Aloft is the maximum loft change (degrees) between at least two sleeve positions. A golf club head within the ranges described above will ensure the highest level of trajectory adjustability.
Additional disclosure regarding providing both a movable weight and an adjustable shaft assembly to a golf club head can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 8,622,847, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
According to some exemplary embodiments of a golf club head described herein, head an areal weight, i.e., material density multiplied by the material thickness, of the golf club head sole, crown and skirt, respectively, is less than about 0.45 g/cm2 over at least about 50% of the surface area of the respective sole, crown and skirt. In some specific embodiments, the areal weight is between about 0.05 g/cm2 and about 0.15 g/cm2, between about 0.10 g/cm2 and about 0.20 g/cm2 between about 0.15 g/cm2 and about 0.25 g/cm2, between about 0.25 g/cm2 and about 0.35 g/cm2 between about 0.35 g/cm2 and about 0.45 g/cm2, or between about 0.45 g/cm2 and about 0.55 g/cm2.
According to some exemplary embodiments of a golf club head described herein, the head comprises a skirt with a thickness less than about 0.8 mm, and the head skirt areal weight is less than about 0.41 g/cm2 over at least about 50% of the surface area of the skirt. In specific embodiments, the skirt areal weight is between about 0.15 g/cm2 and about 0.24 g/cm2, between about 0.24 g/cm2 and about 0.33 g/cm2 or between about 0.33 g/cm2 and about 0.41 g/cm2.
Some of the exemplary golf club heads described herein can be configured to have a constraint defined as the moment of inertia about the golf club head CG x-axis (Ixx) multiplied by the total movable weight mass. According to some embodiments, the second constraint is between about 1.4 kg2·mm2 and about 40 kg2·mm2. In certain embodiments, the second constraint is between about 1.4 kg2·mm2 and about 2.0 kg2·mm2, between about 2.0 kg2·mm2 and about 10 kg2·mm2 or between about 10 kg2·mm2 and about 40 kg2·mm2.
Some of the exemplary golf club heads described herein can be configured to have another constraint defined as the moment of inertia about the golf club head CG z-axis (Izz) multiplied by the total movable weight mass. According to some embodiments, the fourth constraint is between about 2.5 kg2·mm2 and about 72 kg2·mm2. In certain embodiments, the fourth constraint is between about 2.5 kg2·mm2 and about 3.6 kg2·mm2 between about 3.6 kg2·mm2 and about 18 kg2·mm2 or between about 18 kg2·mm2 and about 72 kg2·mm2.
In some embodiments described herein, a moment of inertia about a golf club head CG z-axis (Izz) can be greater than about 190 kg·mm2. More specifically, the moment of inertia about head CG z-axis 203 can be between about 190 kg·mm2 and about 300 kg·mm2, between about 300 kg·mm2 and about 350 kg·mm2, between about 350 kg·mm2 and about 400 kg·mm2, between about 400 kg·mm2 and about 450 kg·mm2, between about 450 kg·mm2 and about 500 kg·mm2 or greater than about 500 kg·mm2.
In some embodiments described herein, a moment of inertia about a golf club head CG x-axis (Ixx) can be greater than about 80 kg·mm2. More specifically, the moment of inertia about the head CG x-axis 201 can be between about 80 kg·mm2 and about 180 kg·mm2, between about 180 kg·mm2 and about 250 kg·mm2 between about 250 kg·mm2 and about 300 kg·mm2, between about 300 kg·mm2 and about 350 kg·mm2, between about 350 kg·mm2 and about 400 kg·mm2, or greater than about 400 kg·mm2.
Additional disclosure regarding areal weight and calculating values for moments of inertia providing both a movable weight and an adjustable shaft assembly to a golf club head can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,963,861, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/042,902, filed Jul. 23, 2018. The prior application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 411000 | Anderson | Sep 1889 | A |
| 1133129 | Govan | Mar 1915 | A |
| 1135621 | Roberts et al. | Apr 1915 | A |
| 1320163 | Maurice | Oct 1919 | A |
| 1518316 | Ellingham | Dec 1924 | A |
| 1526438 | Scott | Feb 1925 | A |
| 1538312 | Beat | May 1925 | A |
| 1555425 | Mckenzie | Sep 1925 | A |
| 1592463 | Marker | Jul 1926 | A |
| 1658581 | Tobia | Feb 1928 | A |
| 1697846 | Anderson | Jan 1929 | A |
| 1704119 | Buhrke | Mar 1929 | A |
| 1705997 | Quynn | Mar 1929 | A |
| 1854548 | Hunt | Apr 1932 | A |
| 1970409 | Wiedemann | Aug 1934 | A |
| D107007 | Cashmore | Nov 1937 | S |
| 2214356 | Wettlaufer | Sep 1940 | A |
| 2225930 | Sexton | Dec 1940 | A |
| 2257575 | Reach | Sep 1941 | A |
| 2328583 | Reach | Sep 1943 | A |
| 2360364 | Reach | Oct 1944 | A |
| 2375249 | Richer | May 1945 | A |
| 2460435 | Schaffer | Feb 1949 | A |
| 2652256 | Thomas | Sep 1953 | A |
| 2681523 | Sellers | Jun 1954 | A |
| 2691525 | Callaghan | Oct 1954 | A |
| 3064980 | Steiner | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3084940 | Cissel | Apr 1963 | A |
| 3466047 | Rodia et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3486755 | Hodge | Dec 1969 | A |
| 3556533 | Hollis | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3589731 | Chancellor | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3606327 | Gorman | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3610630 | Glover | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3652094 | Glover | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3672419 | Fischer | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3680868 | Jacob | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3692306 | Glover | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3743297 | Dennis | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3810631 | Braly | May 1974 | A |
| 3860244 | Cosby | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3897066 | Belmont | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3976299 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3979122 | Belmont | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3979123 | Belmont | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3997170 | Goldberg | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4008896 | Gordos | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4021047 | Mader | May 1977 | A |
| 4043563 | Churchward | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4052075 | Daly | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4076254 | Nygren | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4085934 | Churchward | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4121832 | Ebbing | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4150702 | Holmes | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4189976 | Becker | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4214754 | Zebelean | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4262562 | MacNeill | Apr 1981 | A |
| D259698 | MacNeill | Jun 1981 | S |
| 4322083 | Imai | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4340229 | Stuff, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4398965 | Campau | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4411430 | Dian | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4423874 | Stuff, Jr. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4438931 | Motomiya | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4471961 | Masghati et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4489945 | Kobayashi | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4530505 | Stuff | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4553755 | Yamada | Nov 1985 | A |
| D284346 | Masters | Jun 1986 | S |
| 4602787 | Sugioka et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4607846 | Perkins | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4712798 | Preato | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4730830 | Tilley | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4736093 | Braly | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4754974 | Kobayashi | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4754977 | Sahm | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4762322 | Molitor et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4795159 | Nagamoto | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4803023 | Enomoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4809983 | Langert | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4867457 | Lowe | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4867458 | Sumikawa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4869507 | Sahm | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4890840 | Kobayashi | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4895371 | Bushner | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4915558 | Muller | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4962932 | Anderson | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4994515 | Washiyama et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5006023 | Kaplan | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5020950 | Ladouceur | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5028049 | McKeighen | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5039267 | Wollar | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042806 | Helmstetter | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5050879 | Sun et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5058895 | Igarashi | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5067715 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5076585 | Bouquet | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5078400 | Desbiolles et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5121922 | Harsh, Sr. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122020 | Bedi | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5193810 | Antonious | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5213328 | Long et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5219408 | Sun | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5221086 | Antonious | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5232224 | Zeider | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5244210 | Au | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5251901 | Solheim et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5253869 | Dingle et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255913 | Tsuchida | Oct 1993 | A |
| D343558 | Latraverse et al. | Jan 1994 | S |
| 5297794 | Lu | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5301941 | Allen | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306008 | Kinoshita | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5316305 | McCabe | May 1994 | A |
| 5320005 | Hsiao | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328176 | Lo | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330187 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5346216 | Aizawa | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5346217 | Tsuchiya et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5385348 | Wargo | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395113 | Antonious | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5410798 | Lo | May 1995 | A |
| 5419556 | Take | May 1995 | A |
| 5421577 | Kobayashi | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429365 | McKeighen | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5439222 | Kranenberg | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441274 | Clay | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5447309 | Vincent | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5449260 | Whittle | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5451056 | Manning | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5467983 | Chen | Nov 1995 | A |
| D365615 | Shimatani | Dec 1995 | S |
| 5472201 | Aizawa et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5472203 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480152 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5511786 | Antonious | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5518243 | Redman | May 1996 | A |
| 5533730 | Ruvang | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538245 | Moore | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5564705 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571053 | Lane | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573467 | Chou et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582553 | Ashcraft et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5603668 | Antonious | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5613917 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616088 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620379 | Borys | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624331 | Lo et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629475 | Chastonay | May 1997 | A |
| 5632694 | Lee | May 1997 | A |
| 5658206 | Antonious | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5669827 | Nagamoto | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5681228 | Mikame et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683309 | Reimers | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5688189 | Bland | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5709613 | Sheraw | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5718641 | Lin | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5720674 | Galy | Feb 1998 | A |
| D392526 | Nicely | Mar 1998 | S |
| 5735754 | Antonious | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746664 | Reynolds, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
| 5749795 | Schmidt | May 1998 | A |
| 5755627 | Yamazaki et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762567 | Antonious | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766095 | Antonious | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769737 | Holladay et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776010 | Helmstetter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5776011 | Su et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788584 | Parente et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5788587 | Tseng | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5798587 | Lee | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5803829 | Hayashi | Sep 1998 | A |
| RE35955 | Lu | Nov 1998 | E |
| 5851160 | Rugge et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5873791 | Allen | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888148 | Allen | Mar 1999 | A |
| D409463 | McMullin | May 1999 | S |
| 5908356 | Nagamoto | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5911638 | Parente et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913735 | Kenmi | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916042 | Reimers | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5924938 | Hines | Jul 1999 | A |
| D412547 | Fong | Aug 1999 | S |
| 5935019 | Yamamoto | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935020 | Stites et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941782 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947840 | Ryan | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5967904 | Nagai | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5967905 | Nakahara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971867 | Galy | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976033 | Takeda | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997415 | Wood | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6015354 | Ahn et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017177 | Lanham | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019686 | Gray | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023891 | Robertson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032677 | Blechman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6033318 | Drajan, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6033321 | Yamamoto | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042486 | Gallagher | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6056649 | Imai | May 2000 | A |
| 6062988 | Yamamoto | May 2000 | A |
| 6074308 | Domas | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6077171 | Yoneyama | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086485 | Hamada | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6089994 | Sun | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6120384 | Drake | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123627 | Antonious | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139445 | Werner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6149533 | Finn | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162132 | Yoneyama | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162133 | Peterson | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6171204 | Starry | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6186905 | Kosmatka | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6190267 | Marlowe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193614 | Sasamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6203448 | Yamamoto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206789 | Takeda | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206790 | Kubica et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210290 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217461 | Galy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6238303 | Fite | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6244974 | Hanberry, Jr. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248025 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254494 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264414 | Hartmann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270422 | Fisher | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6277032 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6290609 | Takeda | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296579 | Robinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6299546 | Wang | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6299547 | Kosmatka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306048 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319149 | Lee | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319150 | Werner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6334817 | Ezawa et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6338683 | Kosmatka | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6340337 | Hasebe et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
| 6344000 | Hamada | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6344001 | Hamada et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6344002 | Kajita | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6348012 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6348013 | Kosmatka | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6348014 | Chiu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6354961 | Allen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364788 | Helmstetter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379264 | Forzano | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379265 | Hirakawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383090 | O'Doherty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6386987 | Lejeune, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6386990 | Reyes et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390933 | Galloway | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6409612 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6422951 | Burrows | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425832 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6434811 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436142 | Paes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440009 | Guibaud et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6440010 | Deshmukh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6443851 | Liberatore | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6447405 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458044 | Vincent et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461249 | Liberatore | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6471604 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6475101 | Burrows | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6475102 | Helmstetter et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6478692 | Kosmatka | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6491592 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6508978 | Deshmukh | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6514154 | Finn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6524197 | Boone | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6524198 | Takeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6527649 | Neher et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530847 | Antonious | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530848 | Gillig | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6533679 | McCabe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6547676 | Cackett et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6558273 | Kobayashi et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565448 | Cameron et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6565452 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6569029 | Hamburger | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6569040 | Bradstock | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6572489 | Miyamoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6575845 | Galloway et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6575854 | Yang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6582323 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6592468 | Vincent et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6602149 | Jacobson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6604568 | Bliss et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6605007 | Bissonnette et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6607452 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6612938 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6616547 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6623378 | Beach | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6638180 | Tsurumaki | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6638183 | Takeda | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| D482089 | Burrows | Nov 2003 | S |
| D482090 | Burrows | Nov 2003 | S |
| D482420 | Burrows | Nov 2003 | S |
| 6641487 | Hamburger | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6641490 | Ellemor | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648772 | Vincent et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648773 | Evans | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652387 | Liberatore | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| D484208 | Burrows | Dec 2003 | S |
| 6663506 | Nishimoto et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669571 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6669578 | Evans | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6669580 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676536 | Jacobson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6679786 | McCabe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6695712 | Iwata et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6716111 | Liberatore | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6716114 | Nishio | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6719510 | Cobzaru | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6719641 | Dabbs et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6739982 | Murphy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6739983 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743118 | Soracco | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6749523 | Forzano | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6757572 | Forest | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6758763 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6773360 | Willett et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6773361 | Lee | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6776726 | Sano | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6800038 | Willett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6805643 | Lin | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6808460 | Namiki | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6824475 | Burnett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6835145 | Tsurumaki | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| D501036 | Burrows | Jan 2005 | S |
| 6855068 | Antonious | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860818 | Mahaffey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6860823 | Lee | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6860824 | Evans | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875124 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6875129 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6881158 | Yang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6881159 | Galloway et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6887165 | Tsurumaki | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6890267 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6902497 | Deshmukh | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6904663 | Willett et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6923734 | Meyer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6926619 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6929565 | Nakahara | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6939247 | Schweigert et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6960142 | Bissonnette et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6964617 | Williams | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6969326 | De Shiell et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974393 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6988960 | Mahaffey et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991558 | Beach et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| D515165 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
| 6997820 | Willett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004852 | Billings | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7025692 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7029403 | Rice et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7063629 | Nakahara | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7077762 | Kouno et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7086964 | Chen et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7108614 | Lo | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7128662 | Kumamoto | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128664 | Onoda | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7134971 | Franklin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7137905 | Kohno | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7137906 | Tsunoda et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7140974 | Chao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7147572 | Kohno | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7147573 | DiMarco | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7153220 | Lo | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7163468 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166038 | Williams et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166040 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166041 | Evans | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7169060 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7179034 | Ladouceur | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7186190 | Beach et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7189169 | Billings | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198575 | Beach et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201669 | Stites et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7223180 | Willett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7252600 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7255654 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7273423 | Imamoto | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7278926 | Frame | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7278927 | Gibbs et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7294064 | Tsurumaki et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7294065 | Liang et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7350903 | Silverbrook | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7351161 | Beach | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7371191 | Sugimoto | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7377860 | Breier et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7396293 | Soracco | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7407447 | Beach et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7419441 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7445563 | Werner | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7448963 | Beach et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7462109 | Erickson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| D588223 | Kuan | Mar 2009 | S |
| 7500924 | Yokota | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7500926 | Rae et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7520820 | Dimarco | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7530901 | Imamoto et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7530904 | Beach et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7540811 | Beach et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7563175 | Nishitani et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568985 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7572193 | Yokota | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7578753 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7582024 | Shear | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7585233 | Horacek | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7591737 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7591738 | Beach et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7621823 | Beach et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7628707 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632193 | Thielen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632194 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632196 | Reed et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7641569 | Best et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| D612440 | Oldknow | Mar 2010 | S |
| 7670235 | Lo | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7674189 | Beach et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7682264 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7695378 | Nakano | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7699719 | Sugimoto | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7717803 | DiMarco | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7744484 | Chao | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7749101 | Imamoto et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7753806 | Beach et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7758451 | Liang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7771291 | Willett et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7775907 | Hirano | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7798914 | Noble et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7824277 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7854364 | DeShiell | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7857711 | Shear | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7857713 | Yokota | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7867105 | Moon | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7887431 | Beach et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7887434 | Beach et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7896753 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7914393 | Hirsch et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7934999 | Cackett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7946931 | Oyama | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7988565 | Abe | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7993216 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8012038 | Beach et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8012039 | Greaney et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8016694 | Llewellyn et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8025587 | Beach et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8070623 | Stites et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8083609 | Burnett et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8088021 | Albertsen et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8105175 | Breier et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8118689 | Beach et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8133128 | Boyd | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8147350 | Beach et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8157672 | Greaney et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8167737 | Oyama | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8177661 | Beach et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8182364 | Cole et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8197358 | Watson et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
| 8206244 | Honea et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8235831 | Beach et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8235841 | Stites et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8235844 | Albertsen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8241143 | Albertsen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8241144 | Albertsen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8257195 | Erickson | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8257196 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8262498 | Beach et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8262506 | Watson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8277337 | Shimazaki | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8292756 | Greaney et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8303431 | Beach et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8328659 | Shear | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8337319 | Sargent et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8353786 | Beach et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| D675692 | Oldknow et al. | Feb 2013 | S |
| D678964 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678965 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678968 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678969 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678970 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678971 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678972 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| D678973 | Oldknow et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
| 8398503 | Beach et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8403771 | Rice et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| D679354 | Oldknow et al. | Apr 2013 | S |
| 8430763 | Beach et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435134 | Tang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8496541 | Beach et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8496544 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8517855 | Beach et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8517860 | Albertsen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8529368 | Rice et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8562453 | Sato | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8579728 | Morales et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8591351 | Albertsen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8602907 | Beach et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8616999 | Greaney et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| D697152 | Harbert et al. | Jan 2014 | S |
| 8622847 | Beach et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8628433 | Stites et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8632419 | Tang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8641555 | Stites et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8663029 | Beach et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8678949 | Shimazaki | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8690704 | Thomas | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8695487 | Sakane et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8696487 | Beach et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8696491 | Myers | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8702531 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8721471 | Albertsen et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8727900 | Beach et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8734271 | Beach et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| D707768 | Oldknow et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
| D707769 | Oldknow et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
| D707773 | Oldknow et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
| 8753222 | Beach et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8753226 | Rice et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8753229 | Rae | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8758153 | Sargent et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| D708281 | Oldknow et al. | Jul 2014 | S |
| 8783086 | Hirano | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8790195 | Myers et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8795101 | Nishio | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8821312 | Burnett et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8827831 | Burnett et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8834289 | de la Cruz et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8834290 | Bezilla et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845450 | Beach et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845454 | Boyd et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| D714893 | Atwell | Oct 2014 | S |
| 8876622 | Beach et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8876627 | Beach et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8888607 | Beach et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8900069 | Beach et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| D722122 | Greensmith | Feb 2015 | S |
| 8956240 | Beach et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8956244 | Westrum et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8986133 | Bennett et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9033821 | Beach et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9180349 | Seluga et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9186560 | Harbert | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9199145 | Myers | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9205312 | Zimmerman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9211447 | Harbert | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9220953 | Beach | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9220955 | Hayase | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9227115 | Cameron | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9259627 | Myers et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9295885 | Matsunaga et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9364728 | Myers et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
| 9381406 | Boggs | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9381410 | Golden et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9403069 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9498688 | Galvan | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9561405 | Rae | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9597558 | Seluga et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9597561 | Seluga et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9623291 | Greensmith et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9623294 | Kingston et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
| 9630069 | Foster et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9636522 | Cleghorn et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9636553 | Myers | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9662545 | Beach et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9687701 | Seluga et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9687702 | Seluga et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
| 9694257 | Seluga et al. | Jul 2017 | B1 |
| 9694261 | Nunez et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9700763 | Harbert et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9700769 | Beach et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9717962 | Seluga et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9724577 | Kingston et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
| 9776058 | Seluga et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9795840 | Greensmith et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9814954 | Westrum et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9855476 | Seluga et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9861864 | Beach | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9901794 | Beno et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9908017 | Seluga et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9914027 | Harbert et al. | Mar 2018 | B1 |
| 9914030 | Cleghorn et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9931549 | Seluga et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 10076688 | Harbert et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
| 10183202 | Harbert et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
| 10478679 | Harbert et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10639524 | Penney et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10653926 | Story | May 2020 | B2 |
| 20010049310 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020022535 | Takeda | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020025861 | Ezawa | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020032075 | Vatsvog | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055396 | Nishimoto et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072434 | Yabu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123394 | Tsurumaki | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020137576 | Dammen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142859 | Galloway | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160854 | Beach et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169036 | Boone | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183134 | Allen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030013545 | Vincent et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032500 | Nakahara et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036442 | Chao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130059 | Billings | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040023729 | Nagai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040034986 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087388 | Beach et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121852 | Tsurumaki | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157678 | Kohno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157680 | Chen | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176180 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176183 | Tsurumaki | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180730 | Franklin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192463 | Tsurumaki et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192468 | Onoda | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040214660 | Chen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235584 | Chao et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040242343 | Chao | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050049075 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050070371 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096151 | Hou et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096154 | Chen | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101404 | Long et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124435 | Gambetta et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137024 | Stites et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181884 | Beach et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209024 | Oyama | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227781 | Huang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239575 | Chao et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239576 | Stites et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050266933 | Galloway | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019768 | Lo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019770 | Meyer | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060035722 | Beach et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058112 | Haralason et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068932 | Rice et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073910 | Imamoto et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060084525 | Imamoto et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122004 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060128500 | Tavares | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154747 | Beach et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060172821 | Evans | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060189407 | Soracco | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240908 | Adams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070021234 | Tsurumaki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026961 | Hou | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049400 | Imamoto et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049415 | Shear | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049417 | Shear | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070054750 | Rice | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105646 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105647 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105648 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105649 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105650 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105651 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105652 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105653 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105654 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070105655 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117648 | Yokota | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070117652 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080020861 | Adams et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146370 | Beach et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161127 | Yamamoto | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261715 | Carter | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261717 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280698 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090062029 | Stites et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088269 | Beach et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090088271 | Beach et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096688 | Akiyama et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090137338 | Kajita | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090170632 | Beach et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090221383 | Ban | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090264214 | De La Cruz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286611 | Beach et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318245 | Yim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100016095 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100029404 | Shear | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100029408 | Abe | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100035701 | Kusumoto | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048316 | Honea et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100048321 | Beach et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100113176 | Boyd et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100144461 | Ban | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167837 | Ban | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197423 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197426 | De La Cruz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234127 | Snyder et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100331103 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110014995 | Wada | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110021284 | Stites et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098127 | Yamamoto | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151989 | Golden et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151997 | Shear | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110195798 | Sander et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110218053 | Tang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110294599 | Albertsen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120083359 | Stites | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120083362 | Albertsen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120083363 | Albertsen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122601 | Beach et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120142452 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149491 | Beach et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165110 | Cheng | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120165111 | Cheng | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120196701 | Stites et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120202615 | Beach et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120220387 | Beach et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120244960 | Tang et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120270676 | Burnett et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277029 | Albertsen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120277030 | Albertsen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120289361 | Beach et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302366 | Murphy | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130065705 | Morales et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130102410 | Stites et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130165254 | Rice et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130210542 | Harbert et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130324284 | Stites et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140080629 | Sargent et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20150011328 | Harbert et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150065265 | Motokawa et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150105177 | Beach et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150217167 | Frame et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150231453 | Harbert et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150297961 | Voshall et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150306475 | Curtis et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160023060 | Harbert et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160250525 | Motokawa et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160271464 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20170304692 | Beach et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2436182 | Jun 2001 | CN |
| 201353407 | Dec 2009 | CN |
| 9012884 | Sep 1990 | DE |
| 0470488 | Mar 1995 | EP |
| 0617987 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 1001175 | May 2000 | EP |
| 2377586 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 194823 | Dec 1921 | GB |
| 57-157374 | Oct 1982 | JP |
| 4180778 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 05-317465 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 06-126004 | May 1994 | JP |
| 6190088 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 06-238022 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 6-304271 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| 09-028844 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| 03035480 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 09-308717 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 09-327534 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 10-234902 | Aug 1998 | JP |
| 10-277187 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 11114102 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 2000014841 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000197718 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2001054595 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2001-129130 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001170225 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2001204856 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001346918 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002003969 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002017910 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2002052099 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002248183 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002253706 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2003038691 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003093554 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2003126311 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003226952 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2004174224 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004183058 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004222911 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2004-261451 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2004267438 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2004313762 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2004351054 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2004351173 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005028170 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 05-296582 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2005-296458 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 05-323978 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006231063 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2006-320493 | Nov 2006 | JP |
| 2008515560 | May 2008 | JP |
| 4128970 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 2008200118 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2009000281 | Jan 2009 | JP |
| 2010279847 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2011024999 | Feb 2011 | JP |
| WO8802642 | Apr 1988 | WO |
| WO1999020358 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO2001049376 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO0166199 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO02062501 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO03061773 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO2004043549 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2006044631 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO2014070343 | May 2014 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adams Golf Speedline F11 Ti 14.5 degree fairway wood (www.bombsquadgolf.com, posted Oct. 18, 2010). |
| Callaway Golf, World's Straightest Driver: FT-i Driver downloaded from www.callawaygolf.com/ft%2Di/driver.aspx?lang=en on Apr. 5, 2007. |
| Declaration of Tim Reed, VP of R&D, Adams Golf, Inc., dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
| Jackson, Jeff, The Modern Guide to Golf Clubmaking, Ohio: Dynacraft Golf Products, Inc., copyright 1994, p. 237. |
| Nike Golf, Sasquatch 460, downloaded from www.nike.com/nikegolf/index.htm on Apr. 5, 2007. |
| Nike Golf, Sasquatch Sumo Squared Driver, downloaded from www.nike.com/nikegolf/index.htm on Apr. 5, 2007. |
| Office action from the Japanese Patent Office in Patent Application No. 2008-264880, dated Nov. 21, 2012. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 12/781,727, dated Aug. 5, 2010. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/338,197, dated Jun. 5, 2014. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,690, dated May 23, 2012. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/401,690, dated Feb. 6, 2013. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/469,023, dated Jul. 31, 2012. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/469,031, dated Oct. 9, 2014. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/469,031, dated May 20, 2015. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/975,106, dated Feb. 24, 2014. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 13/828,675, dated Jun. 30, 2014. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,795, dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
| Office action from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in U.S. Appl. No. 14/701,476, dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
| Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Press Release, Burner Fairway Wood, www.tmag.com/media/pressreleases/2007/011807_burner_fairway_rescue.html, Jan. 26, 2007. |
| Taylor Made Golf Company Inc., R7 460 Drivers, downloaded from www.taylormadegolf.com/product_detail.asp?pID=14section=overview on Apr. 5, 2007. |
| Titleist 907D1, downloaded from www.tees2greens.com/forum/Uploads/Images/7ade3521-192b-4611-870b-395d.jpg on Feb. 1, 2007. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200346079 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16042902 | Jul 2018 | US |
| Child | 16875802 | US |
