Patent Grant
12128279
This disclosure relates to golf club heads having cast components and related methods for manufacturing such golf club heads.
With the ever-increasing popularity and competitiveness of golf, substantial effort and resources are currently being expended to improve golf clubs. Much of the recent improvement activity has involved the combination of the use of new and increasingly more sophisticated materials in concert with advanced club-head engineering. For example, modern “wood-type” golf clubs (e.g., “drivers,” “fairway woods,” “rescues,” and “utility or hybrid clubs”), with their sophisticated shafts and non-wooden club-heads, bear little resemblance to the “wood” drivers, low-loft long-irons, and higher numbered fairway woods used years ago. These modern wood-type clubs are generally called “metalwoods” or simply “woods.”
The current ability to fashion metalwood club-heads of strong, light-weight metals and other materials has allowed the club-heads to be made hollow. Use of materials of high strength and high fracture toughness has also allowed club-head walls to be made thinner, which reduces total weight and allows increases in club-head size, compared to earlier club-heads without the swing speed penalty resulting from increased weight. Larger club-heads tend to have a larger face plate area and can also be made with high club-head inertia, thereby making the club-heads more “forgiving” than smaller club-heads. Characteristics such as size of the optimum impact location (also known as the “sweet spot”) are determined by many variables including the shape, profile, size and thickness of the face plate as well as the location of the center of gravity (CG) of the club-head.
An exemplary metalwood golf club typically includes a shaft having a lower end to which the club-head is attached. Most modern versions of these club-heads are made, at least in part, of a light-weight but strong metal such as titanium alloy. In some cases, the club-head comprises a body to which a face plate (used interchangeably herein with the terms “face” or “face insert” or “striking plate” or “strike plate”) is later attached, while in other cases the body and face place are cast together as a unitary structure, such that the face plate does not have to be later attached to the body. The face plate defines a front surface or strike face that actually contacts the golf ball.
Regarding the total mass of the metalwood club-head as the club-head's mass budget, at least some of the mass budget must be dedicated to providing adequate strength and structural support for the club-head. This is termed “structural” mass. Any mass remaining in the budget is called “discretionary” or “performance” mass, which can be distributed within the metalwood club-head to address performance issues, for example. Thus the ability to reduce the structural mass of the metalwood club-head without compromising strength and structural support provides the potential for increasing discretionary mass and hence improved club performance.
One opportunity to reduce the total mass of the club head is to lower the mass of the face plate by reducing its thickness; however opportunities to do this are somewhat limited given that the face absorbs the initial impact of the ball and thus has quite rigorous requirements on its physical and mechanical properties. Club manufacturers have used titanium and titanium alloys for face plate manufacture as well as whole club head manufacture, given their lightness and high strength. Typically for the club head given its relatively complex 3-D structure, casting processes have been used for its manufacture. Many such face plates are made by the investment casting process wherein an appropriate metal melt is cast into a preheated ceramic investment mold formed by the lost wax process. Investment casting has also been used to prepare the face plate either as a unitary structure cast with the rest of the club head body or as separately formed face plate which is then attached to the front of the club head body, usually by welding. Although widely used, investment casting of complex shaped components of such reactive materials can be characterized by relatively high costs and low yields. Low casting yields are attributable to several factors including surface or surface-connected void type defects and/or inadequate filling of certain mold cavity regions, especially thin mold cavity regions, and associated internal void, shrinkage and like defects.
To further compound the deficiencies of investment casting the face plate, club head manufacturers often also introduce curvature onto the face of the club to help compensate for directional problems caused by shots hit other than where the center of gravity is located. Thus rather than planar face plate manufacturers may wish to form the face with both a heel-to-toe convex curvature (referred to as “bulge”) and a crown-to-sole convex curvature (referred to as “roll”). In addition manufacturers may also introduce variable face thickness profiles across the face plate. Varying the thickness of a faceplate may increase the size of a club head COR zone, commonly called the sweet spot of the golf club head, which, when striking a golf ball with the golf club head, allows a larger area of the face plate to deliver consistently high golf ball velocity and shot forgiveness. Also, varying the thickness of a faceplate can be advantageous in reducing the weight in the face region for re-allocation to another area of the club head.
In order to make up for the deficiencies of investment casting these more complex face plate structures, manufacturers have turned to alternative methods of forming the face plate including laser cutting the face plate shape from a rolled titanium sheet followed by subsequent forging to impart any desired bulge and roll followed by a machining step on a lathe to introduce any desired face thickness profile. Disadvantages of these steps include the fact that three separate forming steps are needed and the machining process on a lathe to form variable thickness profiles is not only wasteful but also limits the profiles to circular shaped areas as a result of the circular motion of the lathe.
Thus it would be highly desirable to have club head face plates with sufficient physical properties to allow reduction in thickness to result in more available discretionary weight in a club head. It would also be desirable if the face plates were also able to exhibit any desired bulge and roll curvature in addition to any variable thickness profile having any shape-circular, oval, asymmetrical or otherwise. It would also be desirable if a simplified process for manufacture of such face plates could be employed which would result in face plate with the required thickness and physical strength properties which process would also result in a face plate with any desired bulge and roll and variable thickness profile while requiring a minimum of processing steps and minimizing any waste produced in the process. It would also be desirable if the club head body and the face could be cast at the same time from the same material as a single unitary body, rather than two pieces that must be later attached together. It would also be desirable if the cast face plate did not require chemical etching to remove or reduce the thickness of the alpha case to provide adequate durability properties for the face plate.
Some golf club head bodies disclosed herein can be cast of 9-1-1 titanium with the face plate being cast as a unitary part of the body along the with crown, sole, skirt and hosel. Due to the 9-1-1 titanium material, the face plate and other portions of the body acquire less oxygen from the mold and can have a reduced alpha case thickness, resulting in greater ductility and durability. This can eliminate the need to reduce the alpha case thickness after casting using hydrofluoric acid or other dangerous chemical etchants. Casting methods can include preheating the casting mold to a lower than normal temperature and/or coating an inner surface of the mold, to further reduce the amount of oxygen transferred from the mold to the 9-1-1 titanium during casting.
In some embodiments, a wood-type golf club head body comprises a crown, a sole, skirt, a face plate, and a hosel; the body defines a hollow interior region; the body is cast substantially entirely of 9-1-1 titanium; and the body is cast as a single unitary casting, with the face plate being formed integrally with the crown, sole, skirt, and hosel. The body may comprise trace fluorine atoms as alloying impurities found in the titanium alloy, but due to the absence of etching the face with hydrofluoric acid after casting, the content of fluorine present in the body can be very low. In some embodiments, the face plate can have substantially no fluorine atoms, such as less than 1000 ppm, less than 500 ppm, less than 200 ppm, and or less than 100 ppm. In some embodiments, the body can have an alpha case thickness of 0.150 mm or less, 0.100 mm or less, and/or 0.070 mm or less.
Some exemplary methods comprise preparing a mold for casting and then casting a golf club head body substantially entirely of 9-1-1 titanium using the mold, wherein the cast body includes a crown, a sole, skirt, a face plate, and a hosel, wherein the cast body defines a hollow interior region; and wherein the body is cast as a single unitary casting, with the face plate being formed integrally with the crown, sole, skirt, and hosel during the casting. Some such methods do not include etching the face plate after the casting. In some methods, preparing the mold comprises preheating the mold such that the mold is at a temperature of 800 C or less, 700 C or less, 600 C or less, and/or 500 C or less, when the casting occurs.
Also disclosed herein are golf club head embodiments comprising a metallic cast cup forming a forward portion of the club head, including a hosel, a face portion, a forward portion of a crown, and a forward portion of a sole. A metallic rear ring can be formed separately from the cast cup and coupled to heel and toe portions of the cast cup to form a club head body, such that the metallic club head body defines a hollow interior region, a crown opening, and a sole opening. A composite crown insert can then be coupled to the crown opening. A sole insert made of composite, metal, or other material can be coupled to the sole opening. In some embodiments, there is no sole opening or sole insert. The cast cup and rear ring can be cast of a titanium alloy, and can be welded together to form the club head body. In some embodiments, the ring and cup are comprised of different metallic materials, such as two different titanium alloys, or a titanium allow and steel. The cast cup can include a face portion that has an intricate geometry to provide desirable performance properties. The face portion can have a twisted front surface and/or the rear surface of the face can have a geometry that provides an asymmetric variable thickness profile across the face. The rear surface of the face portion of the cast cup can be machined and/or otherwise modified before the rear ring is attached such that there is increased room to access the entire rear surface of the face with tools.
Also disclosed are methods of forming a wax cup from a wax cup frame and a separately formed wax face, using a wax welding process. Such a wax cup can then be used to create a mold for casting the metallic cup that forms the front portion of a golf club head. The two piece wax welding process can provide manufacturing, prototyping, and testing advantages.
Also disclosed are cast face plates, such as comprising titanium alloys, which have novel geometries.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the disclosed technology will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The following describes embodiments of golf club heads for metalwood type golf clubs, including drivers, fairway woods, rescue clubs, utility clubs, hybrid clubs, and the like.
The inventive features disclosed herein include all novel and non-obvious features disclosed herein both alone and in combinations with any other features. As used herein, the phrase “and/or” means “and”, “or”, and both “and” and “or”. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” refer to one or more than one, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, the term “includes” means “comprises.”
The following also makes reference to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof. The drawings illustrate specific embodiments, but other embodiments may be formed and structural changes may be made without departing from the intended scope of this disclosure. Directions and references (e.g., up, down, top, bottom, left, right, rearward, forward, heelward, toeward, etc.) may be used to facilitate discussion of the drawings but are not intended to be limiting. For example, certain terms may be used such as “up.” “down,”, “upper,” “lower.” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left.” “right,” and the like. These terms are used, where applicable, to provide some clarity of description when dealing with relative relationships, particularly with respect to the illustrated embodiments. Such terms are not, however, intended to imply absolute relationships, positions, and/or orientations. For example, with respect to an object, an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning the object over. Nevertheless, it is still the same object. Accordingly, the following detailed description shall not be construed in a limiting sense and the scope of property rights sought shall be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could.” “might.” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more particular embodiments or that one or more particular embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
It should be emphasized that the herein-described embodiments are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the present disclosure. Any process descriptions or blocks in flow diagrams should be understood as representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process, and alternate implementations are included in which functions may not be included or executed at all, may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those reasonably skilled in the art of the present disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the present disclosure. Further, the scope of the present disclosure is intended to cover any and all combinations and sub-combinations of all elements, features, and aspects discussed above. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of the present disclosure, and all possible claims to individual aspects or combinations of elements or steps are intended to be supported by the present disclosure.
For reference, within this disclosure, reference to a “driver type golf club head” means any metalwood type golf club head intended to be used primarily with a tee. In general, driver type golf club heads have lofts of 15 degrees or less, and, more usually, of 12 degrees or less. Reference to a “fairway wood type golf club head” means any wood type golf club head intended to be used to strike a ball off the ground, while also being usable to strike a ball off a tee as well. In general, fairway wood type golf club heads have lofts of 15 degrees or greater, and, more usually, 16 degrees or greater. In general, fairway wood type golf club heads have a length from leading edge to trailing edge of 73-97 mm. Various definitions distinguish a fairway wood type golf club head from a hybrid type golf club head, which tends to resemble a fairway wood type golf club head but be of smaller length from leading edge to trailing edge. In general, hybrid type golf club heads are 38-73 mm in length from leading edge to trailing edge. Hybrid type golf club heads may also be distinguished from fairway wood type golf club heads by weight, by lie angle, by volume, and/or by shaft length. Driver type golf club heads of the current disclosure may be 15 degrees or less in various embodiments or 10.5 degrees or less in various embodiments. In various embodiments, fairway wood type golf club heads of the current disclosure may be from 13-26 degrees.
As illustrated in
The body may further include openings in the crown and/or sole that are overlaid or covered by inserts formed of lighter-weight material, such as composite materials. For example, the crown of the body can comprise a composite crown insert that covers a large portion of the area of the crown and has a lower density that the metal the body is made out of, thereby saving weight in the crown. Similarly, the sole can include one or more openings in the body that are covered by sole inserts. The sole insert can be made of composite material, metallic material, or other material. In embodiments where the body includes openings in the crown or sole, such openings can provide access to the inner cavity of the club head during manufacturing, especially where the face plate is formed as an integral part of the body during casting (and there is not a face opening in the body to provide access during manufacturing). The club heads disclosed herein in relation to
In some embodiments, the club head can comprise adjustable weights, such as one or more weights movable along weight tracks formed in the sole and/or perimeter of the club head. Other exemplary weights can be adjusted by rotating the weights within threaded weight ports. Various ribs, struts, mass pads, and other structures can be included inside the body to provide reinforcement, adjust mass distribution and MOI properties, adjust acoustic properties, and/or for other reasons.
Wood-type club heads, such as the club head 2, have a volume, typically measured in cubic-centimeters (cm3), equal to the volumetric displacement of the club head, assuming any apertures are sealed by a substantially planar surface. (See United States Golf Association “Procedure for Measuring the Club Head Size of Wood Clubs,” Revision 1.0, Nov. 21, 2003). In the case of a driver, the golf club head can have a volume between approximately 250 cm3 and approximately 600 cm3, such as between approximately 300 cm3 and approximately 500 cm3, and can have a total mass between approximately 145 g and approximately 260 g. In the case of a fairway wood, the golf club head can have a volume between approximately 120 cm3 and approximately 300 cm3, and can have a total mass between approximately 115 g and approximately 260 g. In the case of a utility or hybrid club, the golf club head can have a volume between approximately 80 cm3 and approximately 140 cm3, and can have a total mass between approximately 105 g and approximately 280 g.
The sole 14 is defined as a lower portion of the club head 2 extending upwards from a lowest point of the club head when the club head is ideally positioned, i.e., at a proper address position relative to a golf ball on a level surface. In some implementations, the sole 14 extends approximately 50% to 60% of the distance from the lowest point of the club head to the crown 12, which in some instances, can be approximately 15 mm for a driver and between approximately 10 mm and 12 mm for a fairway wood.
Materials which may be used to construct the body 10, including the face plate 18, can include composite materials (e.g., carbon fiber reinforced polymeric materials), titanium or titanium alloys, steels or alloys of steel, magnesium alloys, copper alloys, nickel alloys, and/or any other metals or metal alloys suitable for golf club head construction. Other materials, such as paint, polymeric materials, ceramic materials, etc., can also be included in the body. In some embodiments, the body including the face plate can be made of a metallic material such as titanium or titanium alloys (including but not limited to 9-1-1 titanium, 6-4 titanium, 3-2.5, 6-4, SP700, 15-3-3-3, 10-2-3, or other alpha/near alpha, alpha-beta, and beta/near beta titanium alloys), or aluminum and aluminum alloys (including but not limited to 3000 series alloys, 5000 series alloys, 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6, and 7000 series alloys, such as 7075), Ti Grade 9 (Ti-3Al-2.5V) having a chemical composition of ≤3.5-2.5% Al; ≤3.0-2.0% V; ≤0.02% N; ≤0.013% H; ≤0.12 Fe.
Aspects of Investment Casting
Injection molding is used to form sacrificial “initial” patterns (e.g., made of casting “wax”) of the desired castings. A suitable injection die can be made of aluminum, or other suitable metal or metal alloy, or other material, e.g., by a computer-controlled machining process using a casting master. CNC (computer numerical control) machining can be used to form the intricacies of the mold cavity in the die. The cavity dimensions are established so as to compensate for linear and volumetric shrinkage of the casting wax encountered during casting of the initial pattern and also to compensate for any similar shrinkage phenomena expected to be encountered during actual metal casting performed later using an investment-casting “shell” formed from the initial pattern.
Usually, a group of initial patterns is assembled together and attached to a central wax sprue to form a casting “cluster.” Each initial pattern in the cluster forms a respective mold cavity in the casting shell formed later around the cluster. The central wax sprue defines the locations and configurations of runner channels and gates for routing molten metal, introduced into the sprue, to the mold cavities in the casting shell. The runner channels can include one or more filters (made, e.g., of ceramic) for enhancing smooth laminar flow of molten metal into and in the casting shell and for preventing entry of any dross, that may be trapped in the mold, into the shell cavities.
The casting shell is constructed by immersing the casting cluster into a liquid ceramic slurry, followed by immersion in a bed of refractory particles. This immersion sequence is repeated as required to build up a sufficient wall thickness of ceramic material around the casting cluster, thereby forming an investment-casting shell. An exemplary immersion sequence includes six dips of the casting cluster in liquid ceramic slurry and five dips in the bed of refractory particles, yielding an investment-casting shell comprising alternating layers of ceramic slurry and refractory material. The first two layers of refractory material desirably comprise fine (300 mesh) zirconium oxide particles, and the third to fifth layers of refractory material can comprise coarser (200 mesh to 35 mesh) aluminum oxide particles. Each layer is dried under controlled temperature (25±5° C.) and relative humidity (50±5%) before applying the subsequent layer.
The investment-casting shell is placed in a sealed steam autoclave in which the pressure is rapidly increased to 7-10 kg/cm2. Under such a condition, the wax in the shell is melted out using injected steam. The shell is then baked in an oven in which the temperature is ramped up to 1000-1300° C. to remove residual wax and to increase the strength of the shell. The shell is now ready for use in investment casting.
After the club-head is designed and the initial pattern is made, the manufacturing effort is shifted to a metal caster. To make the investment-casting shell, the metal caster first configures the cluster comprising multiple initial patterns for individual club-heads. Configuring the cluster also involves configuring the metal-delivery system (gates and runners for later delivery of molten metal). After completing these tasks, the caster tools up to fabricate the casting shells.
An important aspect of configuring the cluster is determining the locations at which to place the gates. A mold cavity for an individual club-head usually has one main gate, through which molten metal flows into the mold cavity. Additional auxiliary (“assistant”) gates can be connected to the main gate by flow channels. During investment casting using such a shell, the molten metal flows into each of the mold cavities through the respective main gates, through the flow channels, and through the auxiliary gates. This manner of flow requires that the mold for forming the initial pattern of a club-head also define the main gate and any assistant gates. After molding the wax initial pattern of the club-head, the initial pattern is removed from the mold, and the locations of flow channels are defined by “gluing” (using the same wax) pieces of wax between the gates. Reference is made to
Multiple initial patterns for respective club-heads are then assembled into the cluster, which includes attaching the individual main gates to “ligaments.” The ligaments include the sprue and runners of the cluster. A “receptor,” usually made of graphite or the like, is placed at the center of the cluster where it later will be used to receive the molten metal and direct the metal to the runners. The receptor desirably has a “funnel” configuration to aid entry-flow of molten metal. Additional braces (made of, e.g., graphite) may be added to reinforce the cluster structure.
Usually, the overall wax-cluster is sufficiently large (especially if the furnace chamber that will be used for forming the shell is large) to allow pieces of wax to be “glued” to individual branches of the cluster first, followed by ceramic coating of the individual branches separately before the branches are assembled together into the cluster. Then, after assembling together the branches, the cluster is transferred to the shell-casting chamber.
Two exemplary clusters are shown in
The reinforced wax cluster is then coated with multiple layers of slurry and ceramic powders, with drying being performed between coats. After forming all the layers, the resulting investment-casting shell is autoclaved to melt the wax inside it (the ceramic and graphite portions are not melted). After removing the wax from the shell, the shell is sintered (fired), which substantially increases its mechanical strength. If the shell will be used in a relatively small metalcasting furnace (e.g., capable of holding a cluster of only one branch), the shell can now be used for investment casting. If the shell will be used in a relatively large metal-casting furnace, the shell can be assembled with other shell branches to form a large, multi-branched cluster.
Modern investment casting of metal alloys is usually performed while rotating the casting shell in a centrifugal manner to harness and exploit the force generated by the ω2r acceleration of the shell undergoing such motion, where ω is the angular velocity of the shell and r is the radius of the angular motion. This rotation is performed using a turntable situated inside a casting chamber under a sub atmospheric pressure. The force generated by the ω2r acceleration of the shell urges flow of the molten metal into the mold cavities without leaving voids. The investment-casting shell (including its constituent clusters and runners) is generally assembled outside the casting chamber and heated to a pre-set temperature before being placed as an integral unit on the turntable in the chamber. After mounting the shell to the turntable, the casting chamber is sealed and evacuated to a pre-set sub atmospheric-pressure (“vacuum”) level. As the chamber is being evacuated, the molten alloy for casting is prepared, and the turntable commences rotating. When the molten metal is ready for pouring into the shell, the casting chamber is at the proper vacuum level, the casting shell is at a suitable temperature, and the turntable is spinning at the desired angular velocity. Thus, the molten metal is poured into the receptor of the casting shell and flows throughout the shell to fill the mold cavities in the shell.
As molten metal flows into the shell cavity and makes contact with the cavity surface, the high temperature environment (from both the molten metal and the preheated shell) encourages diffusion of elements, such as oxygen, in the shell material. Although titanium casting is always carried out under the sub atmospheric-pressure (vacuum) and oxygen is not available in the ambient environment, oxygen can still be found in the shell (as the shell consists of multiple layers of “oxides”). Introducing oxygen to the molten titanium causes the formation of an oxygen-rich layer, the alpha-case, on the surface of the titanium object to be cast. Typically, the thickness of the alpha-case is on the order of 1-4% of the thickness of the object.
As the alpha-case is “enriched” with oxygen, it is brittle (oxygen is one of the most effective elements of increasing the strength of titanium alloys, but while the strength is increased the ductility is greatly reduced) and can easily crack upon loading. To reduce the propensity of forming alpha-case the diffusion rate of oxygen needs to be reduced, and to reduce the diffusion rate the temperature needs to be reduced. However, it is impossible to reduce the temperature of the molten titanium. Therefore, reducing the temperature of the pre-heated shell is one way of reducing the diffusion rate of oxygen, thus reducing the formation of the alpha-case.
Typically, before transferring to the casting furnace a casting shell will be heated (called pre-heating) to aid the flow of molten titanium. The higher the pre-heat temperature of the shell, the easier the flow of titanium. This is essential for thin-wall titanium casting and the pre-heat temperature can be as high as 1100-1200 C. On the other hand, such high temperatures tend to produce thick alpha-case layers (towards the higher end of the 1-4% wall thickness range). Therefore, the pre-heat temperature of a casting shell can be lowered if the formation of alpha-case is a concern. Typically, the pre-heat temperature of a casting shell is lower than 1000 C or, preferably, lower than 900 C for non-flow-critical titanium castings where formation of alpha-case is undesirable.
Cluster Casting Methods
As seen with reference to
In some embodiments, step 363 includes heating metal to molten state. In various embodiments, heating temperatures may be higher or lower depending on application. In some embodiments, step 362 includes accelerating the cluster angularly to an angular velocity, e.g., about 360 revolutions per minute. In various embodiments, angular speeds may range from 250-450 revolutions per minute. In various embodiments, angular speeds as low as 150 rpm and as high as 600 rpm may be suitable.
Because of lower casting temperatures, the step of allowing molten metal to cool in the mold cluster includes a reduced waiting time as compared to traditional investment-casting processes. The result is improved yield and better cycle times. In various traditional investment casting methods that rely on gravity, casting of only 6-8 maximum parts was possible. Using centrifugal casting, 18-25 parts or more may be cast in one cycle, thereby increasing production capacity for a single casting cycle. Additionally, yield per gram of pour is also increased. For traditional investment casting methods, a certain mass of metal is used to cast a certain number golf club heads. With spin casting techniques of the current disclosure, the same mass of metal can be used to produce more golf club heads. Improvements and honing of the techniques in the current disclosure can reduce this mass of metal/per head even further. Reduced cycle times can also be present depending on particular methodology. Additionally, the methods described herein lead to reduced tooling and capital expenditure required for the same production demand. As such, methods described herein reduce cost and improve production quality.
Additionally, casting according to the method described herein leads to a savings in material and achieve greater throughput because material can be more easily flowed to a greater number of heads given the increased acceleration and, thereby, force applied to the casting. Finally, alloys that typically are manufactured using other methods may be more easily cast to similar geometries.
Gating and Cluster Configurations
Configuring the gates and the cluster(s) involves consideration of multiple factors. These include (but are not necessarily limited to): (a) the dimensional limitations of the casting chamber of the metal-casting furnace, (b) handling requirements, particularly during the slurry-dipping steps that form the investment-casting shell, (c) achieving an optimal flow pattern of the molten metal in the investment-casting shell, (d) providing the cluster(s) of the investment-casting shell with at least minimum strength required for them to withstand rotational motion during metal casting, (e) achieving a balance of minimum resistance to flow of molten metal into the mold cavities (by providing the runners with sufficiently large cross-sections) versus achieving minimum waste of metal (e.g., by providing the runners with small cross-sections), and (f) achieving a mechanical balance of the cluster(s) about a central axis of the casting shell. Item (e) can be important because, after casting, any metal remaining in the runners does not form product but rather may be “contaminated” (a portion of which is usually recycled). These configurational factors are coupled with metal-casting parameters such as shell-preheat temperature and time, vacuum level in the metal-casting chamber, and the angular velocity of the turntable to produce actual casting results. As club-head walls are made increasingly thinner, careful selection and balance of these parameters are essential to produce adequate investment-casting results.
Details of investment casting as performed at metal casters tend to be proprietary. But, experiments at various titanium casters have in the past revealed some consistencies and some general trends. For example, a particular club-head (having a volume of 460 cm3, a crown thickness of 0.6 mm, and a sole thickness of 0.8 mm) was fabricated at each of six titanium casters (having respective metal-casting furnaces ranging from 10 kg to 80 kg capacity), producing the data tabulated in
From the minimum-force requirement can be derived a lower threshold of the amount of molten metal necessary for pouring into the shell. Excluding unavoidable pouring losses, the best metal usage (as achieved by caster 1) was 386 g (0.386 kg) for club-heads each having a mass of approximately 200 g (including gate and some runner). This is equivalent to a material-usage ratio of 200/386=52 percent. The accelerations (max) applied to the investment-casting shell by the casters 2-6 were all higher than the acceleration applied by caster 1, but more molten metal was needed by each of casters 2-6 to produce respective casting yields that were equivalent to that achieved by caster 1.
Some process loss (splashing, cooled metal adhering to side walls of the crucible and coup supplying the liquid titanium alloy, revert cleaning loss, and the like) is unavoidable. Process loss imposes an upper limit to the efficiency that can be achieved by smaller casting furnaces. i.e., the percentage of process loss increases rapidly with decreases in furnace size, as illustrated in
On the other hand, smaller casting furnaces advantageously have simpler operation and maintenance requirements. Other advantages of smaller furnaces are: (a) they tend to process smaller and simpler clusters of mold cavities, (b) smaller clusters tend to have separate respective runners feeding each mold cavity, which provides better interface-gating ratios for entry of molten metal into the mold cavities, (c) the furnaces are more easily and more rapidly preheated prior to casting. (d) the furnaces offer a potentially higher achievable shell-preheat temperature, and (e) smaller clusters tend to have shorter runners, which have lower Reynolds numbers and thus pose reduced potentials for disruptive turbulent flow. While larger casting furnaces tend not to have these advantages, smaller casting furnaces tend to have more unavoidable process loss of molten metal per mold cavity than do larger furnaces.
In view of the above, the cost-effective casting systems (furnaces, clusters, yields, net material costs) appear to include medium-sized systems, so long as appropriate cluster- and gate-design considerations are incorporated into configurations of the investment-casting shells used in such furnaces. This can be seen from comparing casters 1, 4, and 5. The overall usages of material (without considering process losses) by these three casters are very close (664-667 g/cavity). Material usage (considering process loss) by caster 1 is 386 g, while that of casters 4 and 5 is 510 g. Thus, whereas casters 4 and 5 could still improve, it appears that caster 1 has reached its limit in this regard.
Flow-Field Considerations
At least the minimum threshold force applied to molten metal entering the investment-casting shell can be achieved by either changing the mass or increasing the velocity of the molten metal entering the shell, typically by decreasing one and increasing the other. There is a realistic limit to the degree to which the mass of “pour material” (molten metal) can be reduced. As the mass of pour material is reduced, correspondingly more acceleration is necessary to generate sufficient force to move the molten metal effectively into the investment-casting shell. But, increasing the acceleration increases the probability of creating turbulent flow of the molten metal entering the shell. Turbulent flow is undesirable because it disrupts the flow pattern of the molten metal. A disrupted flow pattern can require even greater force to “push” the metal though the main gate into the mold cavities.
The Reynolds number can be easily modified by changing the shape and/or dimensions of the runner(s). For example, changing R (flow radius) will affect the Reynolds number directly. The smaller R (flow radius) will result in less minimum force (the two almost having a reciprocal relationship). Hence, an advantageous consideration is first to reduce the Reynolds number to maintain a steady flow field of the molten metal, and then satisfy the requirement of minimum force by adjusting the amount of pour material.
Other Factors
One additional factors is preheating the investment-casting shell before introducing the molten metal to it. Caster 1 achieved 94% yield with the smallest Reynolds number and the minimum amount of pour material (and thus the lowest force) in part because caster 1 had the highest shell-preheat temperature. Another factor is the complexity of the cluster(s). Evaluating a complex cluster is very difficult, and the high Reynolds numbers usually exhibited by such clusters are not the only variable to be controlled to reduce disruptive turbulent flow of molten metal in such clusters. For example, the number of “sharp” turns (90-degree turns or greater) in runners and mold cavities of the cluster is also a factor. In regard to
Another factor is matching the runner and gates. The interface gating ratio for caster 1 is the closest to 100% (indicating optimal gating), compared to the substantially inferior data from the other casters. The “worst” was caster 3, whose investment-casting shell had a Reynolds number almost as low as that of caster 1, but caster 3 achieved a yield of only 78%, due to a poor interface gating ratio (approximately 23%). The low interface gating ratio exhibited by the shell of caster 3 increased the difficulty of determining whether the cause of caster 3's low yield was insufficient pour material to fill the gates or the occurrence of “two-phase flow-liquid and vacancy.” In any event, the overall cross-sectional areas of runners and gates may be kept as nearly equal (and constant) to each other as possible to achieve constant flow velocity of liquid metal throughout the shell at any moment during pouring. For thin-walled titanium alloy castings, this principle applies especially to the interfaces between the runner and the main gates, where the interface gating ratio should be no less than unity (1.0).
Yet another factor is the cross-sectional shape of the runner. Comparing casters 4 and 5, and casters 2 and 5, triangular-section runners appeared to produce lower Reynolds numbers than rounded or rectangular runners. Although using triangular-section runners can cause problems with interface gating ratio (as metal flows from such a runner into a rectilinear-section or round-section gate), the significant reduction in Reynolds numbers achieved using triangular-section runners is worth pursuing as the difference in pour material used by casters 2 and 5 indicates (39 kg versus 32 kg).
A flow-chart for configuring a cluster of an investment-casting shell is shown in
More information regarding investment casting methods and devices for casting thin-walled club heads using titanium alloys and other materials can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,513,296, issued Apr. 7, 2009, and in U.S. Publication No. 2016/0175666, published Jun. 23, 2016, both of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. While these incorporated references disclose methods and systems for casting club head bodies without the face plate included (face plate is later attached to body), the same or similar methods and systems can be used, with the same or similar benefits and advantages, to cast the herein disclosed club head bodies where the face in an integrally cast part of the body, not formed separately and later attached to the body.
More information regarding coatings on molds for casting titanium alloys, and methods for producing molds having a calcium oxide face coat for use in casting titanium alloys, can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,329, issued Jun. 16, 1998, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Club Heads Comprising Cast Titanium Alloy Body/Face
Compared to titanium golf club faces formed for sheet machining or forging processes, cast faces can have the advantage of lower cost and complete freedom of design. However, golf club faces cast from conventional titanium alloys, such as 6-4 Ti, need to be chemically etched to remove the alpha case on one or both sides so that the faces are durable. Such etching requires application of hydrofluoric (HF) acid, a chemical etchant that is difficult to handle, extremely harmful to humans and other materials, an environmental contaminant, and expensive.
Faces cast from titanium alloys comprising aluminum (e.g., 8.5-9.5% Al), vanadium (e.g., 0.9-1.3% V), and molybdenum (e.g., 0.8-1.1% Mo), optionally with other minor alloying elements and impurities, herein collectively referred to a “9-1-1 Ti”, can have less significant alpha case, which renders HF acid etching unnecessary or at least less necessary compared to faces made from conventional 6-4 Ti and other titanium alloys.
Further, 9-1-1 Ti can have minimum mechanical properties of 820 MPa yield strength, 958 MPa tensile strength, and 10.2% elongation. These minimum properties can be significantly superior to typical cast titanium alloys, such as 6-4 Ti, which can have minimum mechanical properties of 812 MPa yield strength, 936 MPa tensile strength, and ˜6% elongation.
Golf club heads that are cast including the face as an integral part of the body (e.g., cast at the same time as a single cast object) can provide superior structural properties compared to club heads where the face is formed separately and later attached (e.g., welded or bolted) to a front opening in the club head body. However, the advantages of having an integrally cast Ti face are mitigated by the need to remove the alpha case on the surface of cast Ti faces.
With the herein disclosed club heads comprising an integrally cast 9-1-1 Ti face and body unit, the drawback of having to remove the alpha case can be eliminated, or at least substantially reduced. For a cast 9-1-1 Ti face, using a conventional mold pre-heat temperature of 1000 C or more, the thickness of the alpha case can be about 0.15 mm or less, or about 0.20 mm or less, or about 0.30 mm or less, such as between 0.10 mm and 0.30 mm in some embodiments, whereas for a cast 6-4 Ti face the thickness of the alpha case can be greater than 0.15 mm, or greater than 0.20 mm, or greater than 0.30 mm, such as from about 0.25 mm to about 0.30 mm in some examples.
In some cases, the reduced thickness of the alpha case for 9-1-1 Ti face plates (e.g., 0.15 mm or less) may not be thin enough to provide sufficient durability needed for a face plate and to avoid needing to etch away some of the alpha case with a harsh chemical etchant, such as HF acid. In such cases, the pre-heat temperature of the mold can be lowered (such as to less than 800 C, less than 700 C, less than 600 C, and/or less than or equal to 500 C) prior to pouring the molten titanium alloy into the mold. This can further reduce the amount of oxygen transferred from the mold to the cast titanium alloy, resulting in a thinner alpha case (e.g., less than 0.15 mm, less than 0.10 mm, and/or less than 0.07 mm). This provides better ductility and durability for the cast body/face unit, which is especially important for the face plate.
The thinner alpha case in cast 9-1-1 Ti faces helps provide enhanced durability, such that the face is durable enough that the removal of part of the alpha case from the face via chemical etching is not needed. Thus, hydrofluoric acid etching can be eliminated from the manufacturing process when the body and face are unitarily cast using 9-1-1 Ti, especially when using molds with lower pre-heat temperatures. This can simplify the manufacturing process, reduce cost, reduce safety risks and operation hazards, and eliminate the possibility of environmental contamination by HF acid. Further, because HF acid is not introduced to the metal, the body/face, or even the whole club head, can comprise very little or substantially no fluorine atoms, which can be defined as less than 1000 ppm, less than 500 ppm, less than 200 ppm, and or less than 100 ppm, wherein the fluorine atoms present are due to impurities in the metal material used to cast the body.
Variable Face Thickness and Bulge & Roll Properties of Faces
In certain embodiments, a variable thickness face profile may be implemented on the face plate, for example as is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/006,060 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,997,820; 6,800,038; 6,824,475; 7,731,603; and 8,801,541; the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference. Varying the thickness of a face plate may increase the size of a club head COR zone, commonly called the sweet spot of the golf club head, which, when striking a golf ball with the golf club head, allows a larger area of the face plate to deliver consistently high golf ball velocity and shot forgiveness. Also, varying the thickness of a faceplate can be advantageous in reducing the weight in the face region for re-allocation to another area of the club head. For example, as shown in
In some embodiments, the cross-sectional profile of the face plate 18 along any axes extending perpendicular to the face plate at the ideal impact location 23 is substantially similar as in
In some embodiments of a golf club head having a face plate with a protrusion, the maximum face plate thickness is greater than about 4.8 mm, and the minimum face plate thickness is less than about 2.3 mm. In certain embodiments, the maximum face plate thickness is between about 5 mm and about 5.4 mm and the minimum face plate thickness is between about 1.8 mm and about 2.2 mm. In yet more particular embodiments, the maximum face plate thickness is about 5.2 mm and the minimum face plate thickness is about 2 mm. The face thickness should have a thickness change of at least 25% over the face (thickest portion compared to thinnest) in order to save weight and achieve a higher ball speed on off-center hits.
In some embodiments of a golf club head having a face plate with a protrusion and a thin sole construction or a thin skirt construction, the maximum face plate thickness is greater than about 3.0 mm and the minimum face plate thickness is less than about 3.0 mm. In certain embodiments, the maximum face plate thickness is between about 3.0 mm and about 4.0 mm, between about 4.0 mm and about 5.0 mm, between about 5.0 mm and about 6.0 mm or greater than about 6.0 mm, and the minimum face plate thickness is between about 2.5 mm and about 3.0 mm, between about 2.0 mm and about 2.5 mm, between about 1.5 mm and about 2.0 mm or less than about 1.5 mm.
As shown in
The method used to obtain the values in the present disclosure is the optical comparator method. Referring back to
To measure the roll, the club head 4 is rotated by 90 degrees such that the Z-axis Z of the club head is generally parallel to the X-axis of the machine. Measurements are taken at the geometric center point 5a of the club face. Further measurements are then taken 15 millimeters away from the geometric center point 5a and along the Z-axis Z of the club face 6 on either side of the center point 5a, and 20 millimeters away from the geometric center point and along the Z-axis of the club face on either side of the center point. An arc is fit through these five measurement points. This arc corresponds to the circumference of a circle with a given radius. This measurement of radius is what is meant by the roll radius.
Curvature is defined as 1/R wherein R is the radius of the circle which corresponds to the measurement arc of the bulge or the roll. As an example, a bulge with a curvature of 0.020 cm−1 corresponds to a bulge measured by a bulge measurement arc which is part of a circle with a radius of 50 cm. A roll with a curvature of 0.050 cm−1 corresponds to a roll measured by a roll measurement arc which is part of a circle with a radius of 20 cm.
In some embodiments, the face plates of the disclosed club heads can have the following properties:
Use of vacuum die casting to produce the club heads described herein results in improved quality and reduced scrap. In addition rejections due to high porosity are virtually eliminated as are rejections after any secondary processing. An excellent surface quality is produced while increasing product density and strength are increased and thus making possible larger, thinner, and more complex, castings. From a processing standpoint, less casting pressure is required, and tool life and mold life are extended. Also waste of the metal or alloy due to flash is reduced or eliminated.
By utilizing a vacuum die casting process, it has been surprisingly found that the titanium bodies and face plates of the disclosed club heads exhibit much smaller grain size than is typically observed for analogous titanium objects made by investment casting, with grains of about 100 μm (micrometers) in size versus about 750 μm grain size for investment cast titanium face plates. More specifically, the titanium bodies/face plates disclosed herein can have a grain size of less than about 400 μm, preferably less than about 300 μm, more preferably less than about 200 μm and even more preferably less than about 150 μm, and most preferably less than about 120 μm.
The titanium bodies/face plates disclosed herein can also exhibit much lower porosity than is typically observed for an analogous separately formed titanium face plate made by investment casting. More specifically, the titanium face plates disclosed herein can have a porosity of less than 1% preferably less than 0.5% more preferably less than 0.1%.
The titanium bodies/face plates disclosed herein can also exhibit much higher yield strength, as measured by ASTM E8, than is typically observed for an analogous titanium face plate made by investment casting.
The titanium face plates disclosed here can also exhibit similar fracture toughness to that typically observed for an analogous titanium face plates made by investment casting, and higher than an analogous face plate made from a wrought mill-annealed product.
The titanium face plates disclosed herein can also exhibit ductility as measured by the percent elongation reported in a tensile test which is defined as the maximum elongation of the gage length divided by the original gage length of from about 10% to about 15%.
The titanium face plates disclosed herein can also exhibit a Young's Modulus of 100 GPa+/−10%, preferably +/−5% and more preferably +/−2% as measured by ASTM E-111.
The titanium face plates disclosed herein can also exhibit an Ultimate Tensile Strength of 970 MPa+/−10%, preferably +/−5% and more preferably +/−2% as measured by ASTM E8.
Combination of the various properties described above allows fabrication of metalwood titanium club heads having titanium face plates that can be 10% thinner than the analogous face plates made by conventional investment casting while maintaining as good if not better strength properties.
In addition to the strength properties of the golf club heads of the present invention, in certain embodiments, the shape and dimensions of the golf club head may be formed so as to produce an aerodynamic shape as according to U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013/0123040 A1, filed on Dec. 18, 2012 to Willett et al., the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. The aerodynamics of golf club heads are also discussed in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,777,773; 8,088,021; 8,540,586; 8,858,359; 8,597,137; 8,771,101; 8,083,609; 8,550,936; 8,602,909; and 8,734,269; the teachings of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
In addition to the strength properties of the aft body, and the aerodynamic properties of the club head, another set of properties of the club head which must be controlled are the acoustical properties or the sound that a golf club head emits when it strikes a golf ball. At club head/golf ball impact, a club striking face is deformed so that vibrational modes of the club head associated with the club crown, sole, or striking face are excited. The geometry of most golf clubs is complex, consisting of surfaces having a variety of curvatures, thicknesses, and materials, and precise calculation of club head modes may be difficult. Club head modes can be calculated using computer-aided simulation tools. For the club heads of the present invention the acoustic signal produced with ball/club impact can be evaluated as described in in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/842,011 filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
In certain embodiments of the present invention the golf club head may be attached to the shaft via a removable head-shaft connection assembly as described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,431 issued on Nov. 6, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. Further in certain embodiments, the golf club head may also incorporate features that provide the golf club heads and/or golf clubs with the ability not only to replaceably connect the shaft to the head but also to adjust the loft and/or the lie angle of the club by employing a removable head-shaft connection assembly. Such an adjustable lie/loft connection assembly is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,025,587 issuing on Sep. 27, 2011, U.S. Pat. No. 8,235,831 issued on Aug. 7, 2012, U.S. Pat. No. 8,337,319 issued on Dec. 25, 2012, as well as copending US Publication No. 2011/0312437A1 filed on Jun. 22, 2011, US Publication No. 2012/0258818 A1 filed on Jun. 20, 2012, US Publication No. 2012/0122601A1 filed on Dec. 29, 2011, US Publication No. 2012/0071264 A1 filed on Mar. 22, 2011 as well as copending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/686,677 filed on Nov. 27, 2012, the entire contents of which patents, publications and applications are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
In certain embodiments the golf club head may feature an adjustable mechanism provided on the sole portion to “decouple” the relationship between face angle and hosel/shaft loft, to allow for separate adjustment of square loft and face angle of a golf club. For example, some embodiments of the golf club head may include an adjustable sole portion that can be adjusted relative to the club head body to raise and lower the rear end of the club head relative to the ground. Further detail concerning the adjustable sole portion is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 8,337,319 issued on Dec. 25, 2012, U.S. Patent Publication Nos. US2011/0152000 A1 filed on Dec. 23, 2009, US2011/0312437 filed on Jun. 22, 2011, US2012/0122601A1 filed on Dec. 29, 2011 and copending U.S. application Ser. No. 13/686,677 filed on Nov. 27, 2012, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In some embodiments movable weights can be adjusted by the manufacturer and/or the user to adjust the position of the center of gravity of the club to give the desired performance characteristics can be used in the golf club head. This feature is described in more detail in the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,773,360, 7,166,040, 7,452,285, 7,628,707, 7,186,190, 7,591,738, 7,963,861, 7,621,823, 7,448,963, 7,568,985, 7,578,753, 7,717,804, 7,717,805, 7,530,904, 7,540,811, 7,407,447, 7,632,194, 7,846,041, 7,419,441, 7,713,142, 7,744,484, 7,223,180, and 7,410,425, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
According to some embodiments of the golf club heads described herein, the golf club head may also include a slidably repositionable weight positioned in the sole and/or skirt portion of the club head. Among other advantages, a slidably repositionable weight facilitates the ability of the end user of the golf club to adjust the location of the CG of the club head over a range of locations relating to the position of the repositionable weight. Further detail concerning the slidably repositionable weight feature is provided in more detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,775,905 and 8,444,505 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/898,313 filed on May 20, 2013 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/047,880 filed on Oct. 7, 2013, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein as well the contents of paragraphs to and FIGS. 93-101 of US Patent Publication No. 2014/0080622 corresponding to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/956,046 filed on Jul. 31, 2013 as well as copending U.S. Patent Application Nos. 62/020,972 filed on Jul. 3, 2014 and 62/065,552 filed on Oct. 17, 2014, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
According to some embodiments of the golf club heads described herein, the golf club head may also include a coefficient of restitution feature which defines a gap in the body of the club, for example located on the sole portion and proximate the face. Such coefficient of restitution features are described more fully in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/791,025, filed Jun. 1, 2010, and Ser. No. 13/338,197, filed Dec. 27, 2011 and Ser. No. 13/839,727, filed Mar. 15, 2013 (US Publication No. 2014/0274457A1) and Ser. No. 14/457,883 filed Aug. 12, 2014 and Ser. No. 14/573,701 filed Dec. 17, 2014, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Additional Exemplary Club Heads
The head 200 comprises a body 202, an adjustable head-shaft connection assembly 204, the crown insert 206 attached to the upper portion of the body, the sole insert 208 mounted inside the body on top of the lower portion of the body, the front weight assembly 210 slidably mounted in the front weight track 214, and the rear weight assembly 212 slidably mounted in the rear weight track 216. The head 200 includes a front sit pad, or ground contact surface, 226 between the front track 214 and the face 270, and a rear sit pad, or ground contact surface, 224 at the rear of the body to the heel side of the rear track 216, with the rest of the sole elevated above the ground when in the normal address position.
The head 200 has a raised sole that is defined by a combination of the body 202 and the sole insert 208. As shown in
The head 200 also includes a toe-side cantilevered ledge 232 extending around the perimeter from the rear weight track 216 or rear sit pad 224 around to toe region adjacent the face, where the ledge 232 joins with a toe portion 230 of the body that extends toeward from the front sit pad 226. One or more optional ribs 236 can join the toe portion 230 to the raised sole adjacent a forward end of the toe-side opening 240 in the body. Three such triangular ribs are illustrated in
The head 200 also includes a heel-side cantilevered ledge 234 that extends from near the hosel region rearward to the rear sit pad 224 or to the rear end of the rear weight track 216. In some embodiments, the two cantilevered ledges 232 and 234 can meet and/or form a continuous ledge that extends around the rear of the head. The rear sit pad 224 can optionally include a recessed rear portion 222 (as shown in
The lower portion of the body 202 that forms part of the sole can include various features, thickness variations, ribs, etc, to provide enhanced rigidity where desired and weight saving when rigidity is less desired. The body can include thicker regions 238, for example, near the intersection of the two weight tracks 214, 216. The body can also include thin ledges or seats 260 around the openings 240, 242, with the ledges 260 configured to receive and mate with sole insert 208. The lower surfaces of the body can also include various internal ribs to enhance rigidity and acoustics, such as ribs 262, 263, 265, and 267 shown in
The upper portion of the body can also include various features, thickness variations, ribs, etc, to provide enhanced rigidity where desired and weight saving when rigidity is less desired. For example, the body includes a thinner seat region 250 around the upper opening to receive the crown insert 206. As shown in
The sole insert 208 has a geometry and size selected to at least cover the openings 240, 242, 244 in the bottom of the body, and can be secured to the frame by adhesion or other secure fastening technique. In some embodiments, the ledges 260 may be provided with indentations to receive matching protrusions or bumps on the underside of the sole insert to further secure and align the sole insert on the frame.
Like the sole, the crown also has an opening 246 that reduces the mass of the body 202, and more significantly, reduces the mass of the crown, a region of the head where increased mass has the greatest impact on raising (undesirably) the CG of the head. Along the periphery of the opening 246, the frame includes a recessed ledge 250 to seat and support the crown insert 206. The crown insert 206 (see
In various embodiments, the ledges of the body that receive the crown and sole inserts (e.g. ledges 250 and 260) may be made from the same metal material (e.g., titanium alloy) as the body and, therefore, can add significant mass to the golf club head. In some embodiments, in order to control the mass contribution of the ledge to the golf club head, the width of the ledges can be adjusted to achieve a desired mass contribution. In some embodiments, if the ledges add too much mass to the golf club head, it can take away from the decreased weight benefits of a sole and crown inserts, which can be made from a lighter materials (e.g., carbon fiber or graphite composites and/or polymeric materials). In some embodiments, the width of the ledges may range from about 3 mm to about 8 mm, preferably from about 4 mm to about 7 mm, and more preferably from about 4.5 mm to about 5.5 mm. In some embodiments, the width of the ledges may be at least four times as wide as a thickness of the respective insert. In some embodiments, the thickness of the ledges may range from about 0.4 mm to about 1 mm, preferably from about 0.5 mm to about 0.8 mm, and more preferably from about 0.6 mm to about 0.7 mm. In some embodiments, the thickness of the ledges may range from about 0.5 mm to about 1.75 mm, preferably from about 0.7 mm to about 1.2 mm, and more preferably from about 0.8 mm to about 1.1 mm. Although the ledges may extend or run along the entire interface boundary between the respective insert and the body, in alternative embodiments, the ledges may extend only partially along the interface boundaries.
The periphery of crown opening 246 can be proximate to and closely track the periphery of the crown on the toe-, rear-, and heel-sides of the head 200. In contrast, the face-side of the crown opening 246 can be spaced farther from the face 270 region of the head. In this way, the head can have additional frame mass and reinforcement in the crown area 252 just rearward of the face 270. This area and other areas adjacent to the face along the toe, heel and sole support the face and are subject to the relatively higher impact loads and stresses due to ball strikes on the face. As described elsewhere herein, the frame may be made of a wide range of materials, including high strength titanium, titanium alloys, and/or other metals. The opening 246 can have a notch at the front side which matingly corresponds to the crown insert projection 207 to help align and seat the crown insert on the body.
The front and rear weight tracks 214, 216 are located in the sole of the club head and define tracks for mounting two-piece slidable weight assemblies 210, 212, respectively, which may be fastened to the weight tracks by fastening means such as screws. The weight assemblies can take forms other than as shown in
The sole of the body 202 preferably is integrally formed with the front weight track 214 extending generally parallel to and near the face of the club head and generally perpendicular to the rear weight track 216, which extends rearward from near the middle of the front track toward the rear of the head.
In the illustrated embodiments, the weight tracks each only include one weight assembly. In other embodiments, two or more weight assemblies can be mounted in either or both of the weight tracks to provide alternative mass distribution capabilities for the club head.
By adjusting the CG forward or rearward via the rear weight track 216, the performance characteristics of the club head can be modified to affect the flight of the ball, especially the ball's tendency to move upwardly or resist falling during flight due to backspin. The use of two weights assemblies in either track can allow for alternative adjustment and interplay between the two weights. For example, with respect to the front track 214, two independently adjustable weight assemblies can be positioned fully on the toe side, fully on the heel side, spaced apart a maximum distance with one weight fully on the toe side and the other fully on the heel side, positioned together in the middle of the weight track, or in other weight location patterns. With a single weight assembly in a track, as illustrated, the weight adjustment options are more limited but the effective CG of the head still can be adjusted along a continuum, such as heelward or toeward or in a neutral position with the weight centered in the front weight track.
As shown in
The weight assemblies can be adjusted by loosening the screws and moving the weights to a desired location along the tracks, then the screws can be tightened to secure them in place. The weights assemblies can also be swapped out and replaced by other weight assemblies having different masses to provide further mass adjustment options. If a second or third weight is added to the weight track, many additional weight location and distribution options are available for additional fine tuning of the head's effective CG location in the heel-toe direction and the front-rear direction, and combinations thereof. This also provides great range of adjust of the club head's MOI properties.
Either or both of the weight assemblies 210, 212 can comprise a three piece assembly including an inner weight member, an outer weight member, and a fastener coupling the two weight members together. The assemblies can clamp onto front, back, or side ledges of the weight tracks by tightening the fastener such that the inner member contacts the inner side the ledge and the outer weight member contacts the outer side of the ledge, with enough clamping force to hold the assembly stationary relative to the body throughout a round of golf. The weight members and the assemblies can be shaped and/or configured to be inserted into the weight track by inserting the inner weight member into the inner channel past the ledge(s) at a usable portion of the weight track, as opposed to inserting the inner weight at an enlarged opening at one end of the weight track where the weight assembly is not configured to be secured in place. This can allow for elimination of such a wider, non-functional opening at the end of the track, and allow the track to be shorter or to have a longer functional ledge width over which the weight assembly can be secured. To allow the inner weight member to be inserted into the track in the middle of the track (for example) past the ledge, the inner weight member can be inserted at an angle that is not perpendicular to the ledge, e.g., an angled insertion. The weight member can be inserted at an angle and gradually rotated into the inner channel to allow insertion past the clamping ledge. In some embodiments, the inner weight member can have a rounded, oval, oblong, arcuate, curved, or otherwise specifically shaped structure to better allow the weight member to insert into the channel past the ledge at a useable portion of the track.
In the golf club heads of the present disclosure, the ability to adjust the relative positions and masses of the slidably adjusted weights and/or threadably adjustable weights, coupled with the weight saving achieved by titanium alloys material use and incorporation of the light-weight crown insert and/or sole insert, further coupled with the discretionary mass provided by the raised sole configurations, can allow for a large range of variation of a number properties of the club-head all of which affect the ultimate club-head performance including the position of the CG of the club-head, MOI values of the club head, acoustic properties of the club head, aesthetic appearance and subjective feel properties of the club head, and/or other properties.
In certain embodiments, the front weight track and the rear weight track have certain track widths. The track widths may be measured, for example, as the horizontal distance between a first track wall and a second track wall that are generally parallel to each other on opposite sides of the inner portion of the track that receives the inner weight member of the weight assembly. With reference to
Additionally, both the front track and rear track have a certain track length. Track length may be measured as the horizontal distance between the opposing longitudinal end walls of the track. For both the front track and the rear track, their track lengths may be between about 30 mm and about 120 mm, such as between about 50 mm and about 100 mm, or such as between about 60 mm and about 90 mm. Additionally, or alternatively, the length of the front track may be represented as a percentage of the striking face length. For example, the front track may be between about 30% and about 100% of the striking face length, such as between about 50% and about 90%, or such as between about 60% and about 80% mm of the striking face length.
The track depth, width, and length properties described above can also analogously also be applied to the front channel 36 of the club head 10.
In
Referring to
In one embodiment, the vertical distance between the level of the ground contact surfaces of the sit pads and the adjacent surfaces of the raised sole portions may be in the range of about 2-12 mm, preferably about 3-9 mm, more preferably about 4-7 mm, and most preferably about 4.5-6.5 mm. In one example, the vertical distance is about 5.5 mm.
In some embodiments, the joints 420 can be located a sufficient distance from the strike face to avoid potential failures due to the severe impacts undergone by the golf club when striking a golf ball. For example, in some embodiments, the joints 420 can be spaced at least 20 mm, at least 30 mm, at least 40 mm, at least 50 mm, at least 60 mm, and/or from 20 mm to 70 mm rearward of a center face 405 of the club head as measured along a y-axis (front-to-back direction). As best illustrated in, e.g.,
In some embodiments, the ring 404 can include a mass pad having increased thickness, such as in the projection 430 or elsewhere, to provide rear weighting for the golf club and move the center of mass rearward and increase MOI about the z and x axes. Such rear weighting can also be accomplished with an added weight member coupled to the rear ring, such as a removable, swappable, and/or adjustable weight member coupled to the rear part of the ring. For example, the projection 430 or other part of the ring 404 can include an opening, such as a threaded opening, a track, or other weight member receiving feature.
In some embodiments, the cup 402 can include a mass pad, such as the mass pad 432 shown in the drawings, at the bottom sole region to lower the center or mass and/or move the center of mass forward. In some embodiments, the cup 402 can include one or more added weight members coupled to the sole portion of the cup, such as in or near the mass pad 432 and/or rearward of the slot 418, such as one or more removable, swappable, and/or adjustable weight members coupled to the cup. For example, the mass pad 432 or other part of the cup 402 can include one or more openings, such as a threaded opening, a track, or other weight member receiving feature. Two or more weight members can also be coupled to the cup at the same time. The weight member(s) can comprise a relatively more dense material that the cast cup material, such as tungsten or steel. In some embodiments, the cup and the ring can have matching weight ports that can allow for swapping weight members between the rear ring locations and the lower cup locations, providing adjustability options to change the mass properties of the club head. In some such examples, a group of swappable weights can be provided with the club head, such as including a 1-3 g weight and a 8-15 g weight, which can be coupled to a weight port in the rear ring or to a weight port in the sole portion of the cup, which can allow for a higher MOI (heavier weight in rear) or lower spin (heavier weight in the low-forward location), or other combinations and mass properties.
The cup 402 is illustrated in more detail in
Forming the wax cup from two separate wax pieces (as in
Starting with two separate wax pieces also allows for efficiencies in forming large numbers of the wax pieces, as each wax piece is smaller and can be produced in greater numbers per batch on the same tree.
Once the wax cup (e.g., 500 or 510) is created, the wax cup can be used to form a mold for casting a metal cup (e.g., cup 402). The mold can comprise ceramic material and/or any other suitable material for casting a metal cup. Once the mold is formed around the wax cup, the wax can be melted and drained out of the mold. Various subsequent steps can then be applied to prepare the mold for casting, including adding gating and/or surface treatments to the mold. In addition, several cup molds can be combined into one mold tree for casting several metallic cups at the same time. After the mold is prepared, molten metal can then be introduced into the mold to cast the metal cup. The mold can then be opened/removed to access the cast metal cup. The cast metal cup can be formed of any suitable metal or metal alloy, including titanium alloys (any suitable metallic material disclosed herein can be used for the cast cup).
After the metal cup is cast, portions of the cast cup can be machined or modified to remove parts of the cast cup as desired. For one example, the front surface of the face portion of the cup can be machined to add horizontal score lines and/or to create a more precise texture, curvature, and twist. For another example, the rear surface of the face portion of the cup can be machined to modify the thickness profile across the height and width of the face portion, producing a desired variable thickness profile across the face portion. The front and/or rear surface of the face portion of the cast cup can also be machined or chemically etched (e.g., using hydrofluoric acid) to remove part or all of the alpha case layer formed during the casting process (e.g., for titanium alloys), such as to make the face portion less brittle and to increase durability of the face portion.
In anticipation of post-casting removal of material from the face portion of the cup, the face portion of the cup can be cast with extra thickness of material, such that a desired amount of material and a desired thickness profile is left after post-casting material removal.
As shown in
Another advantage of casting the cup and the ring separately is that it allows for efficiencies in casting large numbers of each of the ring and cup pieces, as each cast piece is smaller than the combined body and can be produced in greater numbers per batch on the same tree. Also, the same ring piece can be used with various differently shaped cup pieces, so only the tooling for the cup piece need be changed to accommodate a change to the club head body or making several different variations of the club head with different cup/face geometries.
In a traditional process, the face plate is formed from a flat sheet of metal having a uniform thickness. Such a sheet of metal is typically rolled along one axis to reduce the thickness to a certain uniform thickness across the sheet. This rolling process can impart a grain direction in the sheet that creates a different material properties in the rolling axis direction compared to the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction. This variation in material properties can be undesirable and can be avoided by using the disclosed casting methods instead to create face portion.
Furthermore, because a conventional face plate starts off as a flat sheet of uniform thickness, the thickness of the whole sheet has to be at least as great as the maximum thickness of the desired end product face plate, meaning much of the starting sheet material has to be removed and wasted, increasing material cost. By contrast, in the disclosed casting methods, the face portion is initially formed much closer to the final shape and mass, and much less material has to be removed and wasted. This saves time and cost.
Still further, in a conventional process, the initial flat sheet of metal has to be bent in a special process to impart a desired bulge and roll curvature to the face plate. Such a bending process is not needed when using the disclosed casting methods.
The unique thickness profiles illustrated in
By using the herein disclosed casting methods, large numbers of the disclosed club heads can be manufacture faster and more efficiently. For example, 50 or more of the cups 402 can be cast at the same time on a single casting tree, whereas it would take much longer and require more resources to create the novel face thickness profiles on face plates using a conventional milling methods using a lathe, one at a time.
In
The second ring 608 can itself have a variable thickness profile, such that the thickness of the second ring 608 varies as a function of the circumferential position around the center 602. Similarly, the variable blend zone 606 can have a thickness profile that varies as a function of the circumferential position around the center 602 and provides a transition in thickness from the maximum thickness ring 604 to the variable and less thicknesses of the second ring 608. For example, the variable blend zone 606 to a second ring 608 can be divided into eight sectors that are labeled A-H in
One example of the cast cup 600 can have the following thicknesses: 3.1 mm at center 602, 3.3 mm at ring 604, the second ring 608 can vary from 2.8 mm in zone A to 2.2 mm in zone C to 2.4 mm in zone E to 2.0 mm in zone G, and 1.8 mm in the heel and toe zones 610.
One example of the face portion 700 can have the following thicknesses: 3.9 mm at center 702, 4.05 mm at ring 704, 3.6 mm in zone A. 3.2 mm in zone B, 3.25 mm in zone C. 2.05 mm in zone D, 3.35 mm in zone E, 2.05 mm in zone F, 3.00 mm in zone G. 2.65 mm in zone H, and 1.9 mm at perimeter ring 710.
To the heel side, the thicknesses are offset by set amount (e.g., 0.15 mm) to be slightly thicker relative to their counterpart areas on the toe side. A thickening zone 820 (dashed lines) provides a transition where all thicknesses gradually step up toward the thicker offset zone 822 (dashed lines) at the heel side. In the offset zone 822, the ring 823 is thicker than the ring 806 on the heel side by a set amount (e.g., 0.15 mm), and the ring 825 is thicker that the ring 808 by the same set amount. Blend zones 824 and 826 gradually decrease in thickness moving radially outwardly, and are each thicker than their counterpart blend zones 807 and 810 on the toe side. In the thickening zone 820, the inner ring 804 gradually increases in thickness moving toward the heel.
One example of the face portion 800 can have the following thicknesses: 3.8 mm at the center 802, 4.0 mm at the inner ring 804 and thickening to 4.15 mm across the thickening zone 820, 3.5 mm at the second ring 806 and 3.65 mm at the ring 823, 2.4 mm at the third ring 808 and 2.55 mm at the ring 825, 2.0 mm at the fourth ring 811, and 1.8 mm at the perimeter ring 814.
The targeted offset thickness profile shown in
Various other varying face thickness profiles can be produced using the disclosed methods, including those disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/006,060 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,997,820; 6,800,038; 6,824,475; 7,731,603; 8,801,541; 9,943,743; and 9,975,018; the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 9,975,018 discloses examples of striking faces that include a localized stiffened region, such as an inverted cone or ‘donut’ shaped thickness profile that is offset from the center of the face, which alters the launch conditions of golf balls struck by the club head in a way that wholly or partially compensates for, overcomes, or prevents the occurrence of a rightward/leftward deviation. In particular, the localized stiffened region is located on the striking face such that a golf ball struck under typical conditions will not impart a left-tending and/or right-tending sidespin to the golf ball.
All of the disclosed face thickness profiles can be made possible by the casting methods disclosed herein. Such configurations would not be possible using a conventional turning process of removing material in concentric circle patterns from the rear of an originally flat face plate.
In some golf club head embodiments, the face plate can be cast individually, and then welded into a front opening in the frame of the club head. When a face plate is welded to the front opening of frame, extra material is typically produces around the weld zone, and this extra material has to be removed after the welding process to smooth out the transition between the face plate and the frame. This process can be avoided by casting the entire cup, including the face and the frontal frame, as a single cast unit, as disclosed herein.
However, casting the face plate separately can provide advantages over casting the entire cup as a unit. For example, post-processing of the cast face plate is much easier compared to post-processing the face surfaces when it is part of a cup.
Golf club heads that are cast including the face as an integral part of the body (e.g., cast at the same time as a single cast object) can provide superior structural properties compared to club heads where the face is formed separately and later attached (e.g., welded or bolted) to a front opening in the club head body. However, the advantages of having an integrally cast Ti face are mitigated by the need to remove the alpha case on the surface of cast Ti faces.
With the herein disclosed club heads comprising an integrally cast titanium alloy face and body unit (e.g., cast cup), the drawback of having to remove the alpha case can be eliminated, or at least substantially reduced. For a cast 9-1-1 Ti face, using a mold pre-heat temperature of 1000 C or more, the thickness of the alpha case can be about 0.10 mm or less, 0.15 mm or less, or about 0.20 mm or less, or about 0.30 mm or less, such as between 0.10 mm and 0.30 mm in some embodiments, whereas for a cast 6-4 Ti face the thickness of the alpha case can be greater than 0.10 mm, greater than 0.15 mm, or greater than 0.20 mm, or greater than 0.30 mm, such as from about 0.25 mm to about 0.30 mm in some examples. In some embodiments, the alpha case thickness can be as low as 0.1 mm and up to 0.15 mm while providing sufficiently durable products that have a desirably high CT time across the face. In some embodiments, the alpha case on the rear of the face at the geometric center of the face can have a thickness less than 0.30 mm and/or less than 0.20 mm, and this can be accomplished without chemically etching the surface after formation.
Other titanium alloys that can be used to form any of the striking faces and/or club heads described herein can comprise titanium, aluminum, molybdenum, chromium, vanadium, and/or iron. For example, in one representative embodiment the alloy may be an alpha-beta titanium alloy comprising 6.5% to 10% Al by weight, 0.5% to 3.25% Mo by weight, 1.0% to 3.0% Cr by weight, 0.25% to 1.75% V by weight, and/or 0.25% to 1% Fe by weight, with the balance comprising Ti (one example is sometimes referred to as “1300” titanium alloy).
In another representative embodiment, the alloy may comprise 6.75% to 9.75% Al by weight, 0.75% to 3.25% or 2.75% Mo by weight, 1.0% to 3.0% Cr by weight, 0.25% to 1.75% V by weight, and/or 0.25% to 1% Fe by weight, with the balance comprising Ti.
In another representative embodiment, the alloy may comprise 7% to 9% Al by weight, 1.75% to 3.25% Mo by weight, 1.25% to 2.75% Cr by weight, 0.5% to 1.5% V by weight, and/or 0.25% to 0.75% Fe by weight, with the balance comprising Ti.
In another representative embodiment, the alloy may comprise 7.5% to 8.5% Al by weight, 2.0% to 3.0% Mo by weight, 1.5% to 2.5% Cr by weight, 0.75% to 1.25% V by weight, and/or 0.375% to 0.625% Fe by weight, with the balance comprising Ti.
In another representative embodiment, the alloy may comprise 8% Al by weight, 2.5% Mo by weight, 2% Cr by weight, 1% V by weight, and/or 0.5% Fe by weight, with the balance comprising Ti. Such titanium alloys can have the formula Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe. As used herein, reference to “Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe” refers to a titanium alloy including the referenced elements in any of the proportions given above. Certain embodiments may also comprise trace quantities of K, Mn, and/or Zr, and/or various impurities.
Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe can have minimum mechanical properties of 1150 MPa yield strength, 1180 MPa ultimate tensile strength, and 8% elongation. These minimum properties can be significantly superior to other cast titanium alloys, including 6-4 Ti and 9-1-1 Ti, which can have the minimum mechanical properties noted above. In some embodiments, Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe can have a tensile strength of from about 1180 MPa to about 1460 MPa, a yield strength of from about 1150 MPa to about 1415 MPa, an elongation of from about 8% to about 12%, a modulus of elasticity of about 110 GPa, a density of about 4.45 g/cm3, and a hardness of about 43 on the Rockwell C scale (43 HRC). In particular embodiments, the Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe alloy can have a tensile strength of about 1320 MPa, a yield strength of about 1284 MPa, and an elongation of about 10%.
In some embodiments, striking faces and/or cups with a face portion can be cast from Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe. In some embodiments, striking surfaces and club head bodies can be integrally formed or cast together from Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe, depending upon the particular characteristics desired.
The mechanical parameters of Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe given above can provide surprisingly superior performance compared to other existing titanium alloys. For example, due to the relatively high tensile strength of Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe, cast striking faces comprising this alloy can exhibit less deflection per unit thickness compared to other alloys when striking a golf ball. This can be especially beneficial for metalwood-type clubs configured for striking a ball at high speed, as the higher tensile strength of Ti-8Al-2.5Mo-2Cr-1V-0.5Fe results in less deflection of the striking face, and reduces the tendency of the striking face to flatten with repeated use. This allows the striking face to retain its original bulge, roll, and “twist” dimensions over prolonged use, including by advanced and/or professional golfers who tend to strike the ball at particularly high club velocities.
Any of the herein disclosed embodiments can include face portion that has a striking surface that is twisted such that an upper toe portion of the striking surface is more open than a lower toe portion of the striking surface, and such that a lower heel portion of the striking surface is more closed than an upper heel portion of the striking surface. More information regarding golf club heads with twisted striking surfaces can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 9,814,944; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/687,143 filed Jun. 19, 2018; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/160,884 filed Oct. 15, 2018; all of which are herein incorporated by reference in there entireties. Any of these twisted face technologies disclosed in these incorporated references can be implemented in the herein disclosed club heads, in any combination with the herein disclosed technologies.
The herein disclosed technology can be implemented for any type of golf club head, not just the examples disclosed, including drivers, fairways, rescues, hybrids, utility clubs, irons, wedges, and putters.
For purposes of this description, certain aspects, advantages, and novel features of the embodiments of this disclosure are described herein. The disclosed methods, apparatus, and systems should not be construed as being limiting in any way. Instead, the present disclosure is directed toward all novel and nonobvious features and aspects of the various disclosed embodiments, alone and in various combinations and sub-combinations with one another. The methods, apparatus, and systems are not limited to any specific aspect or feature or combination thereof, nor do the disclosed embodiments require that any one or more specific advantages be present or problems be solved.
Although the operations of some of the disclosed embodiments are described in a particular, sequential order for convenient presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangement, unless a particular ordering is required by specific language set forth herein. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, the attached figures may not show the various ways in which the disclosed methods can be used in conjunction with other methods.
As used in this application and in the claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include the plural forms unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Additionally, the term “includes” means “comprises.” Further, the terms “coupled” and “associated” generally mean electrically, electromagnetically, and/or physically (e.g., mechanically or chemically) coupled or linked and does not exclude the presence of intermediate elements between the coupled or associated items absent specific contrary language.
In some examples, values, procedures, or apparatus may be referred to as “lowest,” “best,” “minimum,” or the like. It will be appreciated that such descriptions are intended to indicate that a selection among many alternatives can be made, and such selections need not be better, smaller, or otherwise preferable to other selections.
In the description, certain terms may be used such as “up,” “down,” “upper,” “lower,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left,” “right,” and the like. These terms are used, where applicable, to provide some clarity of description when dealing with relative relationships. But, these terms are not intended to imply absolute relationships, positions, and/or orientations. For example, with respect to an object, an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning the object over. Nevertheless, it is still the same object.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosure may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the disclosure. It will be evident that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the disclosure as set forth. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense. Accordingly, the scope of the disclosure is at least as broad as the following claims. We therefore claim all that comes within the scope of these claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/100,273, filed Nov. 20, 2020, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/161,337, filed Oct. 16, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,874,915, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/059,801 filed Aug. 9, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,780,327, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/543,778, filed Aug. 10, 2017, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 727819 | Mattern | May 1903 | A |
| 1337958 | Reach | Apr 1920 | A |
| 1396470 | Taylor | Feb 1921 | A |
| 1509429 | Hillerich | Jan 1924 | A |
| 1526438 | Scott | Feb 1925 | A |
| 1965954 | Davis | Apr 1930 | A |
| 2005401 | Storz | Jun 1935 | A |
| 2460435 | Schaffer | Feb 1949 | A |
| 3637218 | Carlino | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3941390 | Hussey | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4753440 | Chorne | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4811950 | Kobayashi | Mar 1989 | A |
| 5193811 | Okumoto et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5219408 | Sun | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5282624 | Viste | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5344140 | Anderson | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5437088 | Igarashi | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5499814 | Lu | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5527034 | Ashcraft et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5547427 | Rigal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5676606 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5720674 | Galy | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5785610 | Birmingham | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5930887 | Tomita et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5993329 | Shieh | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6001032 | Onuki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6001495 | Bristow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6017280 | Hubert | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6117023 | Onuki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6224497 | Antonious | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6248025 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6305063 | Ashcraft et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6309310 | Shira | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319148 | Tom | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6332848 | Long et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6348013 | Kosmatka | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6364789 | Kosmatka | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6398665 | Antonious | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6428426 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6471604 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6491592 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6497629 | Takeda | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6565452 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6575845 | Galloway et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582323 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6592466 | Helmstetter et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6604568 | Bliss et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6607452 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6623376 | Poyner | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6645086 | Chen | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6648773 | Evans | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652391 | Kubica et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6663504 | Hocknell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669578 | Evans | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676536 | Jacobson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6710287 | Lu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6713717 | Takeda | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6719644 | Beach | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6739376 | Cheng et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6739982 | Murphy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6739983 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6758763 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6789304 | Kouno | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800038 | Willett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6860818 | Mahaffey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6860824 | Evans | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875129 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6881159 | Galloway et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6890267 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6904663 | Willett et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6926619 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6929565 | Nakahara et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6929566 | Sano | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6955612 | Lu | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6966848 | Kusumoto | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6971436 | Huang | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6988960 | Mahaffey et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991558 | Beach et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994635 | Poyner | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6994637 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7025692 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7066833 | Yamamoto | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7066835 | Evans et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7070517 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7086962 | Galloway et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7097573 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7118493 | Galloway | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7121957 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7125344 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128661 | Soracco et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128664 | Onoda et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7144333 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152656 | Huang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7166038 | Williams et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166039 | Hettinger et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7189165 | Yamamoto | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7229362 | Tavares | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7258630 | Erickson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7258631 | Galloway et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7291074 | Kouno et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7291075 | Williams et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7306527 | Williams et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7338388 | Schweigert et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7338390 | Lindsay | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344452 | Imamoto et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7360578 | Tseng | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7371191 | Sugimoto | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7402113 | Mori et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7413520 | Hocknell et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7416496 | Galloway et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7431667 | Vincent et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7435190 | Sugimoto | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7448961 | Lin | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7452286 | Lin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7462109 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7470201 | Nakahara et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7476161 | Williams et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7481720 | Tavares | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7497789 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7503854 | Galloway et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513296 | Yu et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7524249 | Breier et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7540810 | Hettinger et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7549935 | Foster et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7584531 | Schweigert et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7594863 | Ban | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7607991 | Sorenson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7628713 | Tavares | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7632193 | Thielen | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7637822 | Foster et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7658686 | Soracco | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7674188 | Ban | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7674190 | Galloway et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7677990 | Ban | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7690098 | Chen | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7691008 | Oyama | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7695377 | Yamagishi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7749097 | Foster et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7758449 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7758454 | Burnett et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7785212 | Lukasiewicz, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7803065 | Breier et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7811178 | Davis | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7815521 | Ban et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7819756 | Ban et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7828671 | Ban | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7846038 | Foster et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7846040 | Ban | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7878923 | Yamagishi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7901297 | Ban et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7905798 | Petersen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7918747 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7931546 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7934998 | Yakota | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7976404 | Golden et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7976406 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7980964 | Soracco | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7993216 | Lee | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8012036 | Nakamura | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8020606 | Chao et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8033929 | Yamagishi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8038545 | Soracco | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8043167 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8062151 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8092320 | Yamagishi et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8100781 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8128511 | Golden et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8128513 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8133135 | Stites et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8147354 | Hartwell et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8167739 | Lukasiewicz, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8172699 | Nakamura | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8187119 | Rae et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8214992 | Hirano | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8216087 | Breier et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8221260 | Stites et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8226499 | Soracco | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8277336 | Hirano | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8337324 | Sander et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8337326 | Lukasiewicz, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8342981 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8376877 | Galloway | Feb 2013 | B1 |
| 8419569 | Bennett | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8475292 | Rahrig et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8506420 | Hocknell et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8506421 | Stites et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8517861 | Golden et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8523703 | Rife | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8523705 | Breier et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8550935 | Stites et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8585513 | Ban | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8684861 | Carlyle et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8696490 | Ban | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8715109 | Bennett et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8727908 | Goto | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8747252 | Lukasiewicz, Jr. et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8758162 | Ban | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8827832 | Breier et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8827833 | Amano et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8834291 | Ban | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845453 | Ehlers | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8858361 | Ripp et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8864601 | Ehlers | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8938871 | Roach et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8939192 | Solesbee et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8979670 | Aguayo et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9028340 | Ban | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9033820 | Kato | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9079079 | Fossum et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9089746 | Schweigert | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9149692 | Shimahara | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9162116 | Carlyle et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9162117 | Ehlers | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9308421 | Ban et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9308422 | Ripp et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9320949 | Golden et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9403068 | Golden et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9457245 | Lee | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9474946 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9480887 | Myrhum et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9486676 | Thall et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 9504885 | Ban | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9504889 | Mitzel et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9539477 | Ripp et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9545545 | Li | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9545546 | Li | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9545661 | Li | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9555298 | Carlyle et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9566480 | Voges | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9579550 | Aguayo et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9636559 | de la Cruz et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9636757 | Rice et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9687703 | Li | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9687704 | Li | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9782642 | DeMille | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9814944 | Greaney et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
| 9814951 | Ripp et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9844709 | Tassistro | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9868036 | Kleinert et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 9868037 | Ripp et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 9901789 | Kitagawa et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9908013 | Hettinger et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9914027 | Harbert | Mar 2018 | B1 |
| 9931550 | Seluga et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| 9937389 | Kitagawa et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9950225 | Aguayo et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9975014 | Carlyle et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9975015 | Ripp et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10004958 | Tang et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10076689 | de la Cruz et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10130855 | Stokke | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10155144 | Lee | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10183201 | Schweigert | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10195502 | Ripp et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10213660 | Beno et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10213663 | Goudarzi et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10238926 | Carlyle et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10835791 | Frederickson | Nov 2020 | B1 |
| 10874915 | Greensmith | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10881917 | Greensmith et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 11110325 | Spackman et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 20020091014 | Aldrich | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183134 | Allen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187853 | Beach et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193175 | Soracco et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193177 | Poyner | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030017886 | Hitoshi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060306 | Aldrich | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064823 | Yamamoto | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083151 | Nakahara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030092506 | Matsunaga | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040083596 | Willett et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040099538 | Chao et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116208 | De Shiell et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20050032586 | Willett | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050034834 | Huang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181310 | Yang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050209019 | Schweigert | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221915 | De Shiell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050224207 | Huang | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019770 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060025233 | Lin | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052177 | Norihiko et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100028 | Kuo | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070049410 | Matsunaga | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070049415 | Shear | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078028 | Huang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070079946 | Lin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173346 | Chiang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202963 | Oyama | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219018 | Hirano | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080139339 | Cheng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080171610 | Shin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090105010 | De La Cruz | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209364 | Lukasiewicz, Jr. et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286615 | De La Cruz | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293259 | Rice | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100105499 | Roach et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125000 | Lee | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100248860 | Guerrette et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100290944 | Lin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009211 | Chao et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110092311 | DeShiell et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110159986 | Chao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120225735 | Honea et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130123040 | Willett et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172103 | Greensmith et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130210542 | Harbert et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252755 | Soracco | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140011605 | Lee | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140080632 | Deshmukh et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140080633 | Bezilla et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140256464 | Chao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140283364 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140349780 | Fossum | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150000366 | Lo | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150018119 | Breier et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150072801 | Chang | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150148149 | Beach et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150190687 | Clausen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20160001140 | Lo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160067563 | Murphy et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160175666 | Chao et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160279489 | Seluga et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160361607 | Huang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20160375326 | Nunez et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170043222 | Stokke et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095711 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170246518 | Tang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20180001158 | Mizutani | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180056147 | Ripp et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180104548 | Ripp et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180111027 | Funaki et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180126228 | Penney et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180133566 | Kitagawa et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180169485 | Henrikson et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180236315 | Aguayo et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180243616 | Carlyle et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180311545 | Lambeth et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180369657 | Ban | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190009138 | Aguayo et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190022472 | Del Rosario et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190046844 | Chao et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190046845 | Greensmith et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190046847 | Stokke | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20200038721 | Greensmith et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20210069558 | Greensmith et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210113896 | Greensmith | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 201299943 | Sep 2002 | CN |
| 1395495 | Feb 2003 | CN |
| 1439439 | Sep 2003 | CN |
| 1248752 | Apr 2006 | CN |
| 1958106 | May 2007 | CN |
| 101018589 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 102209579 | Oct 2011 | CN |
| 103386184 | Nov 2013 | CN |
| 103842111 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 103877712 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 104043235 | Sep 2014 | CN |
| 104645569 | May 2015 | CN |
| 106457394 | Feb 2017 | CN |
| 211836196 | Nov 2020 | CN |
| 2002165903 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2002172187 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2003038690 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003275343 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 2005137940 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2006006975 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 3762906 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 200806359 | Feb 2008 | TW |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action (with English translation) for related Taiwanese Application No. 108136509, mailed May 9, 2023, 29 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230310954 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62543778 | Aug 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16161337 | Oct 2018 | US |
| Child | 17100273 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17100273 | Nov 2020 | US |
| Child | 18122487 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16059801 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Child | 16161337 | US |
