Golf club with curved shaft

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6514155
  • Patent Number
    6,514,155
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 10, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 4, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A golf club includes a clubhead and a curved or bent shaft which has a tip end which extends at an angle relative to the remainder of the shaft. The tip end of the shaft is attached to a hosel on the clubhead and extends upwardly and forwardly from the clubhead. The upper end of the shaft extends away from the clubhead to provide the lie angle of the club. The angled tip end moves the upper end of the shaft forwardly relative to the center of gravity of the clubhead, and increases the ability to rotate the face of the clubhead back to a square position during the golf swing.
Description




BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to golf clubs, and more particularly, to a golf club with a bent or curved shaft. Conventional golf club shafts are straight. A straight shaft has only one rotational axis. When a golf club impacts a golf ball, the clubhead and the shaft tend to rotate about the longitudinal axis of the shaft. Rotation of the clubhead decreases the accuracy of the shot.




The invention provides a golf club with a bent or curved shaft. The shaft includes a relative long butt portion and a relatively short tip portion which extends at an angle to the butt portion. The tip portion is attached to the hosel of the clubhead and extends forwardly and upwardly relative to the face of the clubhead. The butt portion extends away from the clubhead at an angle to a horizontal ground plane to establish the lie angle of the club.




The curved shaft has two axes, which increase the torsional stability of the clubhead. The axis of the tip extends forwardly from the face of the clubhead and therefore has a component which extends in the same direction as the impact force which is applied to the face by the golf ball. The tip portion therefore has less tendency to rotate about its axis and thereby reduces the twist or torque of the butt portion.




The angled tip portion also moves the axis of the butt portion forwardly relative to the center of gravity of the clubhead. It is therefore easier to rotate the clubface back to a square position during the golf swing.











DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The invention will be explained in conjunction with illustrative embodiments shown in the accompanying drawing, in which





FIG. 1

is a top view of a conventional prior art golf club with a straight shaft;





FIG. 2

is a top view of a golf club with a bent or curved shaft in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 3

is a diagrammatic illustration of twisting forces on a conventional straight shaft;





FIGS. 4-6

are diagrammatic illustrations of twisting forces on curved shafts;





FIG. 7

is a rear view illustrating both a golf club with a conventional straight shaft and a golf club with a curved shaft and a hosel designed for that shaft;





FIG. 8

is a toe end view of the golf clubs of

FIG. 7

;





FIG. 9

illustrates a curved shaft, partially broken away, in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 10

is a fragmentary sectional view taken along the line


10





10


of

FIG. 9

;





FIG. 11

is a fragmentary front view of an iron golf club formed in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 12

is a fragmentary front view of a wood-type golf club formed in accordance with the invention;





FIG. 13

is a bottom view of a golf club with a curved shaft showing the influence of the curved shaft on the angle of the center of gravity;





FIG. 14

is a view similar to

FIG. 13

of a golf club with a straight shaft;





FIGS. 15-17

are views similar to

FIGS. 13 and 14

;





FIGS. 18 and 19

illustrate tendency of a golf club with a curved shaft to square the club face during the downswing;





FIG. 20

is a dispersion plot of the landing points of golf balls which were struck with a 5 iron having a straight shaft;





FIG. 21

is a dispersion plot of landing points with golf balls which were struck with a 5 iron having a curved shaft;





FIG. 22

is a top view of a golf club with a curved shaft;





FIG. 23

is a front view of the golf club of

FIG. 22

;





FIG. 24

is a toe view of the golf club of

FIG. 22

; and





FIG. 25

is a heel view of the golf club of FIG.


22


.











DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

illustrates a conventional iron golf club


20


which includes a clubhead


21


and a straight shaft


22


. The shaft has a longitudinally extending axis of rotation


23


. When the clubhead impacts a golf ball, a force is imparted on the clubhead in the direction of arrow


24


.





FIG. 3

is a diagrammatic illustration of the forces of FIG.


1


. The shaft


22


includes a butt end


27


and a tip end


28


which is attached to a hosel of the clubhead


29


. The rotational forces


25


and


26


which are exerted on the tip and butt ends of the shaft are resisted by the torsional resistance of the shaft. For a straight shaft, the torsional resistance is similar at both the tip end and the butt end, although the larger diameter of the butt end provides greater torsional resistance.




The rotational forces cause the shaft to twist between the tip end and the butt end, which is held by the golfer. The amount of twist in degrees under a predetermined rotational force is referred to as the torque of the shaft. Higher torque numbers mean greater twist and less resistance to torsion.





FIG. 2

illustrates a golf club


31


which includes a clubhead


32


and a curved or bent shaft


33


. The curved shaft includes a short tip portion


34


which is attached to the hosel of the clubhead and which extends forwardly and upwardly relative to the front striking face


35


of the clubhead. A relatively long, straight butt portion


36


extends upwardly from the tip portion. The shaft


33


has multiple axes of rotation the axis


37


of the tip portion, the axis


38


of the butt portion and a combined axis


39


between the tip and butt ends.




A force


40


created by an impact with a golf ball creates force


41


on the tip portion


14


of the shaft and rotational force


42


on the butt portion. Since the axis


37


of the tip portion extends forwardly from the face


35


, the axis has a component which is aligned with the force


40


. The amount of rotational force which is transmitted to the butt portion


36


is thereby reduced.





FIGS. 4-6

are diagrammatic illustrations of the forces of FIG.


2


. In

FIGS. 4 and 5

the tip portion


34


is attached to the hosel of a golf club and extends at an acute angle A to the butt portion


36


. In

FIG. 6

the axis of the butt portion extends at a right angle relative to the axis of the butt portion. Upon rotational movement of the butt end


43


, the shaft rotates around its primary axis


38


. Rotational movement of the tip end


34


by force


41


creates a revolution around the tip axis


37


. With both the butt and tip ends in supported positions, the curved shaft will rotate around a combined axis CA, which extends between the butt and tip ends.





FIGS. 7 and 8

illustrate superimposed views of a golf clubhead


44


in solid outline which is formed in accordance with the invention and a conventional golf clubhead


45


in dotted outline. The clubhead


44


has a front face


47


, a sole


48


, a toe portion


49


, a heel portion


50


, and a topline


51


. A hosel


52


extends upwardly and forwardly from the face


47


. A curved shaft


53


includes a tip portion


54


having an axis


55


and a butt portion


56


having an axis


57


.




Golf clubheads are conventionally designed relative to a horizontal ground plane HP which is tangent to a midportion


58


of the sole when the sole is properly grounded at an address position. The conventional grooves in the face are horizontal when the clubhead is in the designed address position.




The front edge


59


of the clubhead which is formed by the intersection of the face


47


and the sole


48


is tangent at a midportion of the edge to a first vertical plane VP


1


. A second vertical plane VP


2


extends through the center of gravity CG


1


of the clubhead


44


perpendicularly to plane VP


1


.




The axis of the butt portion


56


of the shaft


53


lies in another vertical plane VP


3


which is parallel to vertical plane VP


1


. Referring to

FIG. 7

, the angle of the axis


57


of the butt portion relative to the horizontal ground plane HP defines the lie angle of the clubhead.




The conventional clubhead


45


is similar to the clubhead


44


except that its topline


62


is higher than topline


51


and the centerline of the hosel


63


extends in a vertical plane VP


4


which is spaced behind the plane VP


3


in which the axis of the butt portion of the curved shaft


53


lies. A straight shaft


64


is attached to the hosel


63


, and its axis lies in the plane VP


4


. The lie angles of the two clubs are substantially the same.




Both of the hosels


52


and


63


are male hosels, and the shafts


53


and


64


extend over the hosels. However, the invention can also be used with female hosels or other means for attaching the shaft to the clubhead.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, the forward extension of the tip portion


54


of the curved shaft


53


positions the butt portion


56


forwardly of the straight shaft


64


. The center of gravity CG


1


of the clubhead


44


is therefore positioned farther away from the butt portion


54


than the center of gravity CG


2


of the clubhead


45


is spaced from the straight shaft


64


.




Referring to

FIG. 7

, the tip portion


54


of the curved shaft


53


extends in a more upright direction than the straight shaft


64


. The axis


57


of the butt portion is thereby moved toward the center of the clubhead, which reduces the moment of inertia about an Axis


1


compared to a moment of inertia about Axis


2


, making it easier to rotate to clubface square. The clubhead


46


also has a lower topline


51


than the conventional topline


62


, which lowers the center of gravity CG


1


relative to the center of gravity CG


2


. In

FIG. 7

the axis


57


of the butt portion


52


extends at an angle C


1


from the vertical, and the axis


55


of the tip portion


54


extends at a smaller angle C


2


from the vertical.





FIGS. 9 and 10

illustrate one embodiment of a curved shaft


66


. The shaft includes a short tip portion


67


having an axis


68


and a long butt portion


69


having an axis


70


. The axes form an included angle B of 18°.




In the embodiment illustrated, the length L


1


of the tip portion was 2.00 inch. The overall length L


2


was 40 inches, and the length of the shaft for a particular club can be adjusted as desired by cutting off the butt end. The outside diameter of the tip portion was 0.480±0.005 inch, and the outside diameter of the butt end


71


was about 0.600±0.005 inch. The shaft was formed from unidirectional pre-preg graphite and epoxy composite material.




The shaft can be formed from other materials, e.g., metals such as stainless steel and aluminum, and the lengths and diameters of the tip and butt portions can vary. The angle B is preferably 18° but can vary between 1° and 90°.





FIG. 11

illustrates an iron golf club


75


which includes a clubhead


76


and a curved shaft


77


. The descriptive text in

FIG. 10

is based on Appendix II of the USGA Rules of Golf Equipment. The golf club


75


conforms to those Rules.





FIG. 12

illustrates a wood-type golf club


78


which includes a clubhead


79


and a curved shaft


80


. Wood-type clubheads are now conventionally formed of metal but can be formed of other materials. The golf club


78


also conforms to the Rules of Golf.





FIGS. 13 and 14

illustrate how the curve or bend of the shaft of a golf club influences the angle of the center of gravity. In

FIG. 13

the golf club


82


has a curved shaft as illustrated in

FIGS. 7-11

. The straight butt portion of the shaft is supported by a horizontal surface S, and the center of gravity CG of the clubhead causes the clubhead to rotate to the position illustrated in FIG.


13


.




The vertical plane VP is lined up with the centerline axis of butt portion of the shaft (primary axis). A tangent between the primary axis VP and the center of the club's leading edge C form the center of gravity (CG) Angle A. The curved shaft prevents the center of gravity CG from rotating counterclockwise to the right of the vertical plane. The angle of the center of gravity is the angle between the vertical plane VP and a line


83


which is tangent to the leading edge of the clubhead. The greater the CG angle A, the more stable the golf club remains on off-center hits. The higher CG angle also assists the clubface with squaring up at impact, assisting less skilled golfers with a tendency to leave the clubface open, which results in slicing the ball.





FIGS. 15-17

illustrate an iron golf club


85


with prior art golf clubs


86


and


87


with straight shafts. Golf club


86


is a utility club with face progression. Golf club


87


is an offset club. In each case the center of gravity CG of the clubhead is positioned to the right of vertical plane. The angle of the center of gravity for each club is less than for the club


82


with the curved shaft.




In the golf swing the face of the golf club is fanned open during the backswing. On the downswing the golfer must square the face of the clubhead by the time that the face contacts the golf club. If the face is still open at impact, the ball will slice.




The greater angle of the center of gravity which is provided by the curved shaft of the invention makes is easier for an average golfer to square the face at the moment of impact and thereby reduces the tendency to slice.




Table 1 provides information for four 5 iron golf clubs which included curved shafts and a conventional Wilson Fat Shaft 5 iron with a straight UST Fat Shaft (the control club). The clubhead for each shaft was a standard Wilson Fat Shaft 5 iron.












TABLE 1











SHAFT
















Manufacturer




Model




CPM




Deflection




Weight




Torque









HST




V2.0




226




4.3″




73




2.6






Aldila




Intermediate




232




4.4″




70




1.6







Modulus






Aldila




Low Modulus




238




4.1″




66




1.7






Aldila




High Modulus




242




4.0″




70




1.1






UST




Fat Shaft




248




3.8″




77




1.6














HEAD













Loft




Lie




Head Wt.









25




61




255






25




61




255






25




61




255






25




61




255






25




61




255














CLUB













Swing Wt.




Length




Frequency









D2




38.5




259






D1.5




38.5




249






D1.5




38.5




258






D1.5




38.5




270






D2




38.5




270














An Iron Byron mechanical golfer was set-up to nominal 5 iron launch conditions with the control club. A standard three point test (Heel/Center/Toe) was used to evaluate the stability aspects of the curved shaft designs as compared to the control club. The curved shaft clubs were placed in the machine after the control club was evaluated, and the face angle adjusted to achieve a straight ball flight. The tee was not adjusted forward/back in the stance, but slight adjustments were made in the up/down and in/out directions to achieve a central ball impact at the midpoint of the 5th scoreline. The three points were hit alternately in a line-by-line fashion (Center, Heel, Toe).




All of the Aldila shafts broke during the set-up portion of the testing. It was not the intention to continue to break all of the shafts, but a result of the sequence of testing (i.e., testing order 1. Control; 2. Aldila Low Mod; 3. Aldila Int. Mod; 4. HST V2.0; 5-Aldila High Mod). The failures of the Aldila shafts were quite peculiar and unexplainable in that they broke in the middle of the shaft and sometimes into multiple pieces. These Aldila shafts were observed to have an oval shaft cross-sectional as compared to the seemingly round cross-section shape of the HST V2.0.




The results of the tests for the control club and for the club with the HST V2.0 club are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3 and illustrated in

FIGS. 20 and 21

, respectively.












TABLE 2











Wilson Golf RTF Test Report






UST FS Control Club





















Carry




Left/Right








Launch




Ball




Back




Distance




of Center







Angle




Velocity




Spin




(yds)




(yds)




SAA






Location




(deg)




(fps)




(rpm)




Adj Center Line




Adj Center Line




(sq yds)






















CENTER CENTER




CC




Avg




14.8




189.2




3544




195.9




0.0




207






(0.000, 0.000)





St Dev




0.2




1.0




179




2.5




6.7






CENTER HEEL




CH




Avg




14.9




178.1




3084




179.4




3.0




230






(0.6875, 0.000)





St Dev




0.3




0.8




178




4.0




4.6






CENTER TOE




CT




Avg




15.0




184.6




3464




192.2




0.3




199






(−0.6875, 0.000)





St Dev




0.2




0.8




177




2.8




5.6






COMPOSITE




ALL




Avg




14.9




183.9




3364




189.1




1.1




183








St Dev




0.1




5.6




246




8.7




1.7











Set-Up Notes:










1. Average clubspeed = 128 ft/sec or 87.2 MPH










2. Smartcore Spin Distance Control Balls marked SET-UP (N = 12 per pt.)










3. 3 pt Test w/ Auto-Tee










4. CC located on mid point of 5th Scoreline










5. Grid Spacing: 0.6875″ Horizontal










6. Frezzi Lighting: 2nd WTAS System










7. Conditions: Afternoon, 95 degrees F., 4 to 9 mph Tail Right to Left.





















TABLE 3











Wilson Golf RTF Test Report






HST V2.0





















Carry




Left/Right








Launch




Ball




Back




Distance




of Center







Angle




Velocity




Spin




(yds)




(yds)




SAA






Location




(deg)




(fps)




(rpm)




Adj Center Line




Adj Center Line




(sq yds)






















CENTER CENTER




CC




Avg




14.4




187.7




3925




191.8




0.0




217






(0.000, 0.000)





St Dev




0.3




0.6




195




3.4




5.2






CENTER HEEL




CH




Avg




14.0




174.8




3523




175.7




1.1




121






(0.6875, 0.000)





St Dev




0.2




0.7




197




2.2




4.4






CENTER TOE




CT




Avg




14.4




183.8




4145




186.4




−0.9




173






(−0.6875, 0.000)





St Dev




0.2




0.8




225




2.7




5.1






COMPOSITE




ALL




Avg




14.3




182.1




3864




184.6




0.1




101








St Dev




0.2




6.6




316




8.2




1.0











Set-Up Notes:










1. Average clubspeed = 128.5 ft/sec or 87.6 MPH










2. Smartcore Spin Distance Control Balls marked SET-UP (N = 12 per pt.)










3. 3 pt Test w/ Auto-Tee










4. CC located on mid point of 5th Scoreline










5. Grid Spacing: 0.6875″ Horizontal










6. Frezzi Lighting: 2nd WTAS System










7. Conditions: Afternoon, 95 degrees F., 4 to 9 mph Tail Right to Left.













Comparing

FIGS. 20 and 21

, the narrower dispersion plot for the HST V2.0 curved shaft club indicates that that club has greater torsional stability than the control club. The curved shaft has greater torsional stability even though the torque of the curve shaft is greater than the torque of the control shaft (2.6 v. 1.8), which means that the curved shaft has less resistance to twisting than the control shaft.





FIGS. 22-25

illustrate a hybrid golf club


90


, i.e., a golf club which has attributes of both a wood an iron, with a curved shaft.

FIG. 22

is a top view of the club in the address position.

FIG. 23

is a front view, and

FIGS. 24 and 25

are toe and heel views, respectively.




While in the foregoing specification a detailed description of specific embodiments of the invention has been set forth for the purpose of illustration, it will be understood that many of the details hereingiven can be varied considerably by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A golf club comprising a clubhead and an elongated shaft attached to the clubhead,the clubhead having a center of gravity, a sole portion having a midportion which is adapted to contact a horizontal ground plane when the clubhead is soled in an address position on the ground plane, a front striking face with a bottom leading edge having a midportion which is tangent to a first vertical plane when the clubhead is in said address position, the front face having a center which lies in a second vertical plane which is perpendicular to said first vertical plane, a toe portion, a heel portion, and a hosel extending from the heel portion, the shaft having a relatively long butt portion having a butt end and a center axis and a relatively short tip portion having a tip end and a center axis which extends at an angle relative to the axis of the butt portion, the tip portion of the shaft being attached to the hosel and the axis of the tip portion extending at an acute angle relative to said first vertical plane forwardly from the center of gravity of the clubhead, the butt portion and tip portion of the shaft being positioned so that when the club is viewed from a vertical plane parallel to said first vertical plane, the axis of the butt portion extends at an angle from said second vertical plane and the axis of the tip portion extends at a smaller angle from said second vertical plane, the axis of the butt portion lying in a third vertical plane when the clubhead is in said address position.
  • 2. The golf club of claim 1 in which said third vertical plane is in front of and parallel to said first vertical plane.
  • 3. The golf club of claim 1 in which the angle between the axes of the butt portion and the tip portion is about 1 to 90°.
  • 4. The golf club of claim 1 in which the angle between the axes of the butt portion and the tip portion is about 18°.
US Referenced Citations (20)
Number Name Date Kind
2926913 Stecher Mar 1960 A
3166320 Onions Jan 1965 A
3539184 Koorland Nov 1970 A
D303132 Muta Aug 1989 S
5106088 Saito Apr 1992 A
5338029 Falzone Aug 1994 A
5465959 Cheng Nov 1995 A
5470070 Bendo Nov 1995 A
5497992 Ritke Mar 1996 A
5569098 Klein Oct 1996 A
5624329 Schneebeli Apr 1997 A
5720672 Smith Feb 1998 A
5746665 Wenker May 1998 A
5803824 Rollingson Sep 1998 A
5885166 Shiraishi Mar 1999 A
5928089 Smith Jul 1999 A
5931741 Fenton, Jr. Aug 1999 A
6033320 Bamberger Apr 2000 A
6083115 King Jul 2000 A
6358162 Piotrowski Mar 2002 B1