The present invention relates generally to a golf club with improved performance characteristics. More specifically, the present invention relates to a metal wood type golf club that is capable of achieving extreme distances similar to that of a driver type golf club head while having the controllability and accuracy of a fairway type golf club head. Even more specifically, the present invention relates to a metal wood type golf club wherein the club head has a height of center of gravity (CG) to face depth ratio of less than about 0.4, a volume of about 150 cubic centimeters (cc) to about 360 cubic centimeters (cc), a face depth of between about 30 millimeters (mm) to about 65 millimeters (mm), a coefficient of restitution (COR) of greater than about 0.790, and a CG location of about 10 mm to about 20 mm off the ground.
The complexities of golf club design are well known. The specifications for each component of a club (i.e. the club head, shaft, hosel, grip, and subcomponents thereof) directly impact the performance of the golf club. Thus, by varying the design specifications, a golf club can be tailored to have specific performance characteristics.
Players utilizing metal wood type golf clubs have generally desired a golf ball trajectory that is longer and straighter, especially when compared to their iron type golf clubs. However, when a metal wood type golf club head is designed to maximize distance, it can sometimes do so at the expense of sacrificing accuracy. Hence, finding the correct balance of length and accuracy in a metal wood type golf club may be difficult, as numerous factors affect the length and accuracy of a metal wood type golf club.
Generally, a specific type of metal wood type golf club head called a “driver” has been used to maximize distances of a golf shot. Driver type golf club heads may achieve maximum distance by utilizing a variety of factors such as a longer shaft, a face having a higher coefficient of restitution (COR), a larger volume that is generally greater than 400 cc, a lighter material such as titanium, and a deeper face depth; resulting in a higher CG location due in part to its physical shape. Driver type golf club heads, because of their higher CG location combined with a deeper face depth, generally perform better off a tee. The focus on performance off a tee for the driver type golf club generally makes it more difficult for the driver type golf club head to hit a golf ball sitting on the ground without a tee; as the higher CG location of a driver type golf club head makes the sweet spot higher off the ground. Moreover, driver type golf club heads, although capable of maximizing the distance of travel of a golf ball upon impact, may generally suffer in terms of accuracy due to the increased shaft length as well as the increased face volume.
It should also be noted that in this prior art driver type golf club head 100, the CG 108 location is relatively high off the ground level 110. This height distance d1 of CG 108 may generally be greater than about 20 mm off the ground 110, due to the large geometric shape of a driver type golf club head 100. A driver type golf club head 100 may generally have a club length of greater than about 44 inches, as the increased club length generally generates more distance through increased momentum. However, it is generally known in the art that increasing shaft length may generally have an adverse affect in decreasing the overall club accuracy for the golfer. Finally a golf ball 150 is shown in
Turning now to
Despite all the attempts to maximize distance of a golf shot, accuracy of a golf shot may be just as important; as golf balls that land in the rough areas of a golf course are more difficult to hit than those that land in the fairway areas of a golf course. Taller grass tends to push the club head off its intended path, and as blades of grass fall between the ball and the striking face, the added lubrication of the blades of grass decreases the friction and reduces the outgoing backspin of the golf ball. In order to address this differentiation in shot difficulty, many iron type golf club heads, especially wedge type golf club heads, have added aggressive groove configurations that help mitigate the loss in spin between a golf ball hit out of the rough when compared to a golf ball hit off of the fairway. Also, iron and wedge designs feature special sole widths and sole curvatures to help the golf club slide through the turf and keep the club head traveling along its intended path. However, despite all the advancements in iron type golf club heads to make shots out of the rough perform as well as shots hit out of the fairway, there still exists a dramatic difference in the shot difficulty; making accuracy of golf shots off the tee box an extremely desirable characteristic.
In order to address the decreased accuracy issue in driver type golf club head, some golfers use fairway type golf club heads to increase accuracy of their tee shots at the expense of sacrificing some distance when compared to a driver type golf club head. Fairway type golf club heads may generally achieve more accuracy than a driver type golf club head due in part to its shorter shaft, smaller volume of generally less than 400 cc, steel material, shallower face depth, and lower CG derived from its physical shape as well as higher lofts. Fairway type golf club heads, because of their lower CG location, shallower face depth, sharper leading edge, and forgiving sole curvatures, are generally capable of performing well when hitting a golf ball off the ground especially compared to a driver type golf club head. Despite their accuracy, fairway type golf club heads generally sacrifice significant distance when compared to driver type metal wood golf clubs due to their inherent properties such as being made out of a steel type material, having a lower COR, as well as having a shorter shaft.
Fairway type golf club head 300 may generally have a plurality of score lines 312 across the entire face 302, as durability of the face 302 of the fairway type golf club head 300 is generally less of a concern due to its steel construction. Although not shown in
It can be seen that both a driver type golf club head and a fairway wood type golf club head have their own separate and distinct advantages when compared to one another. However, both the driver type golf club head and a fairway wood type golf club have significant disadvantages associated with their inherent design, making the advantages of each almost mutually exclusive from one another. Hence it can be seen, there is tremendous advantage in the field for a metal wood type golf club head that can maintain the distance advantages of a driver type golf club head while having the accuracy and stability of a fairway type golf club head while also being capable of hitting a golf ball directly off the ground. More specifically, there is a need in the field for a metal wood type golf club head that has an increased performance characteristic that incorporates both the advantages of a driver type golf club head and a fairway type golf club head.
In one aspect of the present invention is a metal wood type golf club head comprising of a face portion and a body portion. The face portion of the head has a striking surface that has a measurable total face depth used for striking a golf ball. The body portion extends from the rear section of the face portion and has a crown portion and a sole portion. The metal wood type golf club head may have a volume of about 150 cc to about 360 cc as well as a CG location that is positioned at a measurable distance above the ground level; wherein the head has a CG to face depth ratio of less than about 0.40. The CG to face depth ratio is defined by the height of the CG location over the total face depth.
In another aspect of the present invention is a metal wood type golf club comprising of a shaft, a grip connected to a proximal end of the shaft, and a head connected to a distal end of the shaft. The head itself is further comprised of a face portion and a body portion. The face portion of the head has a striking surface that has a measurable total face depth used for striking a golf ball as well as a body portion. The body portion extends from the rear section of the face portion and has a crown portion and a sole portion. The head of the metal wood type golf club may have a volume of about 150 cc to about 360 cc as well as a CG location that is positioned at a measurable distance above the ground level; wherein the head has a performance factor of greater than about 2,900 g-cm2. This Performance Factor, as referred to above, may generally be defined as the product of the face depth, A COR value of the head, and a MOI value of the head about a y-axis all divided by the height of the CG location.
In a further aspect of the present invention is a metal wood type golf club comprising of a shaft, a grip connected to a proximal end of the shaft, and a head connected to a distal end of the shaft. The head itself is further comprised of a face portion and a body portion. The face portion of the head has a striking surface that has a measurable total face depth used for striking a golf ball. The body portion extends from the rear section of the face portion and has a crown portion and a sole portion. The head of the metal wood type golf club may have a volume of about 150 cc to about 360 cc as well as a CG location that is positioned at a measurable distance above the ground level. The face portion of the metal wood type golf club in accordance with this further aspect of the present invention may be further comprised of a top portion containing a first radius of curvature and a bottom portion containing a second radius of curvature, wherein the second radius of curvature is greater than the first radius of curvature.
In an even further aspect of the present invention is a metal wood type golf club comprising of a shaft, a grip connected to a proximal end of the shaft, and a head connected to a distal end of the shaft. The head itself is further comprised of a face portion and a body portion. The face portion of the head has a striking surface that has a measurable total face depth used for striking a golf ball as well as a body portion. The body portion extends from the rear section of the face portion and has a crown portion and a sole portion. The head of the metal wood type golf club may have a volume of about 150 cc to about 360 cc as well as a CG location that is positioned at a measurable distance above the ground level; wherein the head has an accuracy factor of less than about 550 g-cm2. This Accuracy Factor, as referred to above, may generally be defined as the product of a MOI value of the head about a shaft axis multiplied by the height of the CG location all divided by the product of the face depth and the COR value.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with references to the following drawings, description and claims.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
The following detailed description is of the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention, since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
Various inventive features are described below that can each be used independently of one another or in combination with other features. However, any single inventive feature may not address any or all of the problems discussed above or may only address one of the problems discussed above. Further, one or more of the problems discussed above may not be fully addressed by any of the features described below.
“Metal wood type golf club head”, as described in the current invention may generally relate to a hollowed body golf club that could be made out of various materials that may not be metal without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
Inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be comprised of a face portion 402 combined with a body portion extending from the rear of the face portion 402. This body portion may be further comprised of a crown portion and a sole portion as shown in
Inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, may generally have a total mass of about 195 grams to about 220 grams. The weight of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be due partially to the smaller volume of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 as well as the light weight material that is used. The weight of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be between the total weight of a fairway type golf club head 300 and a driver type golf club head 100, allowing it to take advantage of the enhanced performance capabilities of both the driver type golf club head 100 as well as the fairway type golf club head 300.
Face 402 of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be shallower than that of a driver type golf club head 100 (shown in
However, it should be noted that too much of an extended face depth d44 makes such an inventive metal woods type golf club 400 more difficult to hit off the ground 410. In order to capture the capability of such an inventive metal woods type golf club 400 to hit a golf ball 450 off the ground, a “Depth to Volume Ratio” may be used
“Depth to Volume Ratio”, as described above in Equation 1 may generally signify the ability of an inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 to hit a golf ball 450 off the ground 410. This is because a face depth d44 that is too tall may generally make the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 harder to hit a golf ball 450 sitting on the ground 410. Conversely, an inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 that has a volume that is too large may also face the same disastrous fate when trying to hit a golf ball 450 off the ground 410.
Face 402, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, based on the fact that it may be made out of titanium, may have a variable face thickness profile that increases the COR of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 without sacrificing durability of the face 402. Face 402 of the current invention, due partially to the increased surface area combined with the different material composition, may generally be able to achieve a COR value of between about 0.790 to about 0.830. This COR value of between about 0.790 to about 0.830 may generally resemble the COR values of a driver type golf club head 100 allowing the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 to achieve distance gains that are closer to that of a driver type golf club head 100.
It is worth noting that the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally have a CG location 408 that is significantly closer to the ground 410 at a distance d4 allowing for better performance capabilities when the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 is used to strike a golf ball 450 directly off the ground 410. Distance d4, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, may generally be between about 10 mm to about 20 mm off the ground 410, as such a lowered CG location 408 makes the club perform better off the ground 410. The current distance d4 may generally be significantly lower than the CG location 108 of a driver type golf club head 100 depicted as d1 in
In view of the CG location 408 above represented by distance d4 as well as the total face depth d44 of the face 402, a CG to face depth ratio may be calculated by dividing d4 by d44. This CG to face depth ratio, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, may generally be less than about 0.4, more preferably less than about 0.35, and most preferably less than about 0.3. The CG to face depth ratio is indicative of the ability of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 to perform off the ground while maintaining sufficient distance that was originally only capable in a driver type golf club head 100.
Inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, may generally have a moment of inertia (MOI) of between about 2,500 g-cm2 to about 4,500 g-cm2 about the x-axis, the y-axis, and the z-axis. The MOI ranges of the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be attributed to the increased volume of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, especially when compared to a fairway wood type golf club head 300. In addition to the increased volume of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, various other features such as titanium material composition, composite material composition, and/or the geometric shape of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may all help achieve the MOI ranges of between about 2,500 g-cm2 to about 4,500 g-cm2 along all of the axis of rotations of the golf club head 400. The MOI numbers of golf club head 400 about the y-axis is of particular interest in golf club head 400 as that number denotes the ability of a golf club head to resist twisting upon impact with a golf ball, creating straighter shots even when the golf ball 450 is struck off center. Because of the aforementioned reasons, the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may be capable of taking advantage of the increased MOI values similar to the MOI numbers that were originally only capable in a driver type golf club head 100.
In view of the CG location 408 above, the total face depth d44, as well as the increased MOI numbers about the y-axis for the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, a desirable “Performance Factor” can be derived. This desirable “Performance Factor” of the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be defined as the face depth d44 of the face 402 of the CG location 408 multiplied by the MOI number (about the y-axis of rotation) and then multiplied by the COR of the metal wood type golf club head 400 all divided by the height d4 of the CG location 408 as shown below in Equation 2.
The inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, may generally have a “Performance Factor” of greater than about 2,900 g-cm2. More specifically, the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may have a “Performance Factor” of between about 2,900 g-cm2 and about 22,410 g-cm2. This “Performance Factor” is indicative of the ability of an inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 to perform well hitting a golf ball 450 off the ground as well as the ability of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 off a tee, while maintaining a higher COR to result in a metal wood type golf club head 400 having increased distance.
In addition to the MOI numbers about the y-axis mentioned above, it is also worth nothing that the MOI of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 about the shaft axis may also be of concern. Shaft axis may be more easily understood as an axis of rotation about the shaft 406 of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400. The MOI of an inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 about the shaft axis represents the ability of the golf club head 400 to resist twisting about the shaft as it impacts a golf ball. The current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally have a MOI about the shaft axis of between about 3,000 g-cm2 to about 6,000 g-cm2. MOI range about the shaft axis of the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally resemble that of a fairway type golf club head 300 due to the decreased volume of the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, allowing the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 to be more accurate.
The MOI number about the shaft axis for the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may be combined with the various other factors such as depth d44 of face 402, COR of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 as well as the height d4 of the CG location 408 to yield an “Accuracy Factor.” This “Accuracy Factor” of the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may generally be defined as by the MOI about the shaft axis multiplied by the height d4 of the CG location 408 divided by the product of the face depth d44 of the face 402 and the COR of the metal wood type golf club head 400 as shown below in Equation 3.
The inventive metal wood type golf club head 400, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, may generally have an “Accuracy Factor” of less than about 550 g-cm2. More specifically, the inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 may have an “Accuracy Factor” of between about 55 g-cm2 and about 550 g-cm2. This “Accuracy Factor” is indicative of the ability of an inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 to resist twisting for off-center hits, resulting in a metal wood type golf club head 400 having increased accuracy.
Finally, the frontal view of an inventive metal wood type golf club head 400 shown in
Despite the score line patterns disclosed in
The side cross-sectional view of the inventive metal wood type golf club head 600 shown in
Top portion 722 of the face portion 702 may generally contain a roll having a first radius of curvature as shown in
Bottom portion 732, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, may generally have a second radius of curvature resembling the face characteristics of a fairway type golf club head 300. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the second radius of curvature of bottom portion 732 may generally be greater than about 15 degrees resembling, or even exceeding the roll radius of curvature of a fairway type golf club head 300. However, it should be noted that in an extreme situation, the radius of curvature of the bottom portion 732 may be so high that it creates a completely flat bottom portion 732 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. The higher radius of curvature in the bottom portion 732 is generally preferred in a fairway type golf club head 300 because they make the club easier to hit off the ground 710 by eliminating some undesirable leading edge 740 curvature. The current inventive metal wood type golf club head 700 may retain this vertical roll bottom portion 732 to resemble the face of a fairway type golf club head 300 to allow the inventive metal wood type golf club head 700 to be capable of hitting directly off the ground 710 without the need for a tee.
In the current exemplary embodiment shown in
The enlarged view of the face portion 702 of the inventive metal wood golf club head 700 shown in
As it can be seen from above, the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 900 incorporates both the performance advantages of a driver type golf club head 100 as well as the performance advantages of a fairway type golf club head 300. More specifically, inventive metal wood type golf club head 900 may be capable of achieving the distances of a driver type golf club head 100 through its volume range, light weight material characteristics, as well the variable face thickness profile that are similar to a driver type golf club head 100. Additionally, the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 900 may be able to achieve the accuracy and playability of a fairway type golf club head 300 through the lower center of gravity, shorter shaft length, shallower face curvature, and inertia numbers that are similar to a fairway type golf club head 300. Hence, the current inventive metal wood type golf club head 900 is capable of combining the performance advantages of both a driver type golf club head 100 and a fairway type golf club head 300, which have been mutually exclusive in the past.
Other than in the operating example, or unless otherwise expressly specified, all of the numerical ranges, amounts, values and percentages such as those for amounts of materials, moment of inertias, center of gravity locations, loft, draft angles, various performance ratios, and others in the following portions of the specification may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” even though the term “about” may not expressly appear in the value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting form the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Furthermore, when numerical ranges of varying scope are set forth herein, it is contemplated that any combination of these values inclusive of the recited values may be used.
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the present invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
This application is a Continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/490,635, filed on Jun. 24, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5190289 | Nagai et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5839975 | Lundberg | Nov 1998 | A |
5935020 | Stites et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6048278 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6254494 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299549 | Shieh | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6340337 | Hasebe et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6354962 | Galloway et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425832 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6454664 | Long et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6491592 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6530847 | Antonious | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6572491 | Hasebe et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6669577 | Hocknell et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676535 | Sheets et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6776726 | Sano | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6860824 | Evans | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875129 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7137905 | Kohno | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147572 | Kohno | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7354353 | Hocknell et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
8496544 | Curtis et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8591353 | Honea et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
20020193175 | Soracco et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20080161124 | Kajita | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090170632 | Beach et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-319166 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-210398 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002-239041 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-111874 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2011-253586 | Dec 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Jackson, Jeff, The Modern Guide to Golf Clubmaking, Ohio, Dyanacraft Golf Products, Inc., copyright 1994, pp. 236-237. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130303306 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12490635 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13938498 | US |