The present invention relates generally to a golf club with improved weighting characteristics. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club wherein the improved weighting distribution stems from an increase in the mass of the golf club at a specific distance away from the butt end or proximal end of the golf club head to help increase the feel and minimize the dispersion of the golf shot by minimizing the push, fade, and slice tendencies of a golf shot.
In order to create golf clubs that help the golfer achieve a better score, golf club designers have made numerous technological advancements in creating a golf club that is easier to hit. Technological advances such as metalwood drivers, cavity back irons, and even graphite shafts have all made the game of golf easier for the average golfers by helping them hit the golf ball longer and straighter. However, despite all the technical advancements in the game of golf, the biggest variation in a golf swing is often produced by the golfer himself or herself. In fact, a golf swing is so unique to each individual golfer; it can be argued that no two golfers have identical golf swings.
In order to address the often diverging needs of the different swings associated with different golfers, golf club designers make different models of golf clubs that have different performance characteristics to help golfers get more performance out of their particular golf swing. More specifically, golf club designers often create different models of golf club heads having different sizes, shapes, weight, and geometry, allowing various golfers to select from the model that suits their game the most. Although many believe the golf club head to be the most important component of a golf club, golf club designers cannot expect a golf club to perform well if they completely ignore other components of the golf club. One of these key components is the shaft of the golf club head, which can often have different weights, flexes, and materials to provide the golfer even more precision to help them further create the best golf club for their needs. In addition the shaft, the grip portion of the golf club head often forms another important component of the golf club itself. By adjusting the material, weight, feel, tactility of the grip portion of the golf club, the performance of the golf club can once again be significantly affected.
It can be seen from above that although there are several key components to a golf club, the weight of each of the components play a key role in adjusting the overall performance of the golf club itself. In one example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,979,122 to Belmont illustrates one of the way to improve the performance of a golf club head by adjusting the weight at the club head portion of the golf club head. In another example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,051,083 to Hart illustrates one of the earlier examples of adjusting the weight of the golf club head at the grip end of the golf club.
While the prior art has explored many different ways to adjust the weight of the golf club by focusing on the club head portion and the grip portion of the golf club, there has been relatively little advancements in the shaft technology, especially when compared to other components such as the club head. Moreover, there is even less advancement when it comes to focusing the weight adjustment on specific regions of the shaft. Hence it can be seen that there is a need for a technology that can help improve the overall performance of the golf club head by focusing on adjusting the weight of the golf club head at the shaft portion of the golf club.
One aspect of the present invention is a golf club comprising a club head located at a distal end of the golf club, a grip located at a proximal end of the golf club, and a shaft juxtaposed between the club head and the grip, connecting the club head to the grip. The shaft further comprises a heavy weighted section, located at a distance of between exactly 10 and exactly 15 inches away from the proximal end of the golf club, and wherein the heavy weighted section has a mass of greater than about 9 grams.
In another aspect of the present invention is a golf club shaft comprising of a first lightweight section located at a proximal end of the golf shaft, wherein the first lightweight section is defined as a portion of the golf club shaft encompassing a distance of 0 inches to 5 inches from the proximal end of the shaft. The golf club shaft also comprises of a second lightweight section located adjacent to the first lightweight section, wherein the second lightweight section is defined as a portion of the golf club shaft encompassing a distance of 5 inches to 10 inches from the proximal end of the shaft. Finally, the golf club shaft also comprises of a heavy weighted section located adjacent to the second lightweight section, wherein the heavy weighted section is defined as a portion of the golf club shaft encompassing a distance of 10 inches to 15 inches from the proximal end of the shaft, wherein a mass of the heavy weighted section is greater than about 140% of a mass of the second lightweight section.
In a further aspect of the present invention, is a golf club comprising a club head located at a distal end of the golf club, a grip located at a proximal end of the golf club, and a shaft juxtaposed between the club head and the grip, connecting the club head to the grip. The shaft further comprises of a first lightweight section located at a proximal end of the golf shaft, wherein the first lightweight section is defined as a portion of the golf club shaft encompassing a distance of 0 inches to 5 inches from the proximal end of the shaft. The golf club shaft also comprises of a second lightweight section located adjacent to the first lightweight section, wherein the second lightweight section is defined as a portion of the golf club shaft encompassing a distance of 5 inches to 10 inches from the proximal end of the shaft. Finally, the golf club shaft also comprises of a heavy weighted section located adjacent to the second lightweight section, wherein the heavy weighted section is defined as a portion of the golf club shaft encompassing a distance of 10 inches to 15 inches from the proximal end of the shaft, wherein a mass of the heavy weighted section is greater than about 14% of a mass of the shaft.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, description and claims.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
The following detailed description describes the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention, since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
Various inventive features are described below and each can be used independently of one another or in combination with other features. However, any single inventive feature may not address any or all of the problems discussed above or may only address one of the problems discussed above. Further, one or more of the problems discussed above may not be fully addressed by any of the features described below.
In addition to the above,
Although the above discussion focuses on the absolute mass of the heavy weighted section 214, it should be appreciated that the relative dramatic increase in the mass of the golf club shaft 204 at the heavy weighted section 214 compared to the second lightweight section 212 could be another good indicator of the performance enhancement of the present invention. Due to the fact that most carbon fiber golf clubs are constructed by rolling layers of composite on a mandrel, having a highly concentrated location for a heavy weighted section 214 when the neighboring portions have a relatively low mass is an important feature to identify. Hence, it can be understood that in addition to the mass articulated above, the heavy weighted section 214 may generally have a mass that is greater than about 140% than the mass of the second lightweight section 212, more preferably greater than about 145% than the mass of the second lightweight section 212, and most preferably greater than about 150% than the mass of the second lightweight section 212.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the first lightweight section 210 and the second lightweight section 212 may be lumped together, creating a different ratio with the heavy weighted section 214. In this embodiment, the relationship between the heavy weight section 214 may have a mass that is greater than about 50% of the mass of the first lightweight section 210 and the second lightweight section 212, more preferably greater than about 55% of the mass of the first lightweight section 210 and the second lightweight section 212, and most preferably greater than about 60% of the mass of the first lightweight section 210 and the second lightweight section 212.
Finally, it is worth noting that in addition recognizing the extreme mass concentration of the golf club shaft 204 in the heavy weighted section 214, as well as the dramatic increase in mass from the second lightweight section 212 to the heavy weighted section 214; the ratio of the mass of the heavy weighted section 214 relative to the overall mass of the shaft 204 is also elevated. In the current exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the ratio of the mass of the heavy weighted section 214 divided by the overall mass of the shaft 204 may generally be greater than about 14%, more preferably greater than about 15%, and most preferably greater than about 17%. In this embodiment of the present invention, the cut weight of the shaft may generally be between about 45 grams to about 65 grams, more preferably between about 50 grams and about 60 grams, and most preferably about 55 grams.
In addition to illustrating the concentration of the mass of the shaft within the heavy weighted section 214 and its ratio relative to other portions of the golf club shaft 200,
Although the cross-sectional view of the golf club shaft 202, 302, and 402 shows the profile of the heavy weighted section 214, 314, and 414 along the length of the golf club shaft 202, 302, and 402, it does not paint a complete picture of how the current invention works. To do that,
Finally,
It is worth nothing that although the proceeding discussion regarding golf club shafts have been focused on carbon fiber shafts, the same technology could be applied towards steel shafts as well without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
Other than in the operating example, or unless otherwise expressly specified, all of the numerical ranges, amounts, values and percentages such as those for amounts of materials, moment of inertias, center of gravity locations, loft, draft angles, various performance ratios, and others in the aforementioned portions of the specification may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” even though the term “about” may not expressly appear in the value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the above specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Furthermore, when numerical ranges of varying scope are set forth herein, it is contemplated that any combination of these values inclusive of the recited values may be used.
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the present invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Any definitions, terminology, or characterizations of the invention included herein shall take precedence over any conflicting information provided in any material incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1167387 | Daniel | Jan 1916 | A |
1831255 | Menzies | Nov 1931 | A |
2051083 | Hart | Aug 1936 | A |
2782035 | East | Feb 1957 | A |
2992828 | Stewart | Jul 1961 | A |
3075768 | Karns | Jan 1963 | A |
3270564 | Evans | Sep 1966 | A |
3606327 | Gorman | Sep 1971 | A |
3792863 | Evans | Feb 1974 | A |
3945646 | Hammond | Mar 1976 | A |
3963236 | Mann | Jun 1976 | A |
3979122 | Belmont | Sep 1976 | A |
4461479 | Mitchell | Jul 1984 | A |
4674746 | Benoit | Jun 1987 | A |
4690407 | Reisner | Sep 1987 | A |
4887815 | Hughes et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4936586 | Van Raemdonck | Jun 1990 | A |
4988102 | Reisner | Jan 1991 | A |
5049422 | Honma | Sep 1991 | A |
5152527 | Mather et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5244209 | Benzel | Sep 1993 | A |
5297791 | Negishi | Mar 1994 | A |
5351952 | Hackman | Oct 1994 | A |
5465967 | Boeckenhaupt | Nov 1995 | A |
5474298 | Lindsay | Dec 1995 | A |
5569099 | Jackson | Oct 1996 | A |
5575722 | Saia et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591091 | Hackman | Jan 1997 | A |
5632691 | Hannon | May 1997 | A |
5638300 | Johnson | Jun 1997 | A |
5711721 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716289 | Okoneski | Feb 1998 | A |
5792000 | Weber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803823 | Gobush et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810676 | Bird | Sep 1998 | A |
5823878 | Welch | Oct 1998 | A |
5984804 | Berg | Nov 1999 | A |
6007431 | Bloom, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6083123 | Wood | Jul 2000 | A |
6302802 | Pao | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6364787 | Huiskamp | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6441745 | Gates | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6514081 | Mengoli | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6572490 | Ashida | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6626768 | Roelke | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6966846 | Bloom, Jr. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6988968 | Okamoto | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7041000 | Galloway | May 2006 | B1 |
7041014 | Wright et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7154100 | Spartiotis et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171027 | Satoh | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175538 | Miller | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195565 | White et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7219033 | Kolen | May 2007 | B2 |
7261641 | Lindner | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264554 | Bentley | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264555 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267619 | Pettis | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7381139 | Weeks et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399235 | Gill et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7399236 | Takeuchi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7458902 | Gill | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7481716 | Johnson | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7500921 | Cheng | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7545434 | Bean et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7635310 | Keough | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686701 | Hasegawa | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693415 | Shiohara | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699718 | Lindner | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704157 | Shirai et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704160 | Lindner | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7704161 | Lindner | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7744480 | Gobush | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798911 | Gill | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7804998 | Mündermann et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7870790 | Sato et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874944 | LoVine | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7887440 | Wright et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7909705 | Gill et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7997997 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8118687 | Galloway | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8150248 | Woodman | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8177658 | Johnson | May 2012 | B1 |
8216085 | Fujimoto | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221257 | Davenport | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257191 | Stites et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8313392 | White | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8335669 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8444502 | Karube | May 2013 | B2 |
8475300 | Ueda | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491408 | Beach | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8556267 | Gobush | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595312 | Daellenbach et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8636605 | Rose | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8657707 | Ueda et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668595 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20020082105 | Foresi | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020173364 | Boscha | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030109335 | Dineen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040138000 | Braly et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050054459 | Oldenburg | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060084516 | Eyestone et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060166737 | Bentley | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20100323810 | Kaneko | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120052973 | Bentley | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120100923 | Davenport | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120157241 | Nomura et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120214606 | Ueda | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120277016 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277017 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277018 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286114 | Jertson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120289354 | Cottam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120302364 | Boccieri | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130041590 | Burich et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130143687 | Stafford | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165249 | Margoles et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130324289 | Matsunaga | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344973 | Margoles et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012-016560 | Jan 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
http://www.aerotechgolfshafts.com/playerssami99—spec—iron.php (Feb. 24, 2015). |
http://www.golfwrx.com/281885/spotted-true-temper-dynamic-gold-amt-shaft/ (Feb. 17, 2015). |
GoPro Hero HD Club Cam (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBC3D2xOgHI), posted Mar. 8, 2011, 6 pages. |