Patent Grant
8496543
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a golf club with a golf club head having a single keel point. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club having a golf club head with a single keel point and a stable face angle.
2. Description of the Related Art
Appearance is everything. This is especially true when it comes to the appearance of a golf club at address. Perceived face angle affects marketability as some golfers are very sensitive to the look of an “open” or especially “closed” club face at address, and this factor may weigh heavily in a purchase decision. Some golfers will not even try a golf club that has a face angle they consider unappealing, regardless of the performance of the club.
The face angle of a golf club is defined as the angle of the face to the grounded sole line with the shaft hole perpendicular to the line of flight. Maltby, Golf Club Design, Fitting, Alteration, & Repair, The Principles & Procedures, 4th Edition, Ralph Maltby Enterprises, (1995). The perceived face angle is different than the measured face angle as would be measured on a device such as a CMM or De La Cruz gage. The measured face angle is based on the orientation of the face normal vector at a point in the center of the face. The perceived face angle is generally influenced by factors such as head outline shape at address and paint edge along the top of the face.
Alternative solutions to overcome the problem of variability of face angle at address include use of a dual keel point or multi-keel point sole shape, however these sole shapes have undesired affects on styling and on sound from striking the ball. Other inventions that allow for adjustments in the lie angle and face angle are also available. One such example is Callaway Golf, U.S. Pat. No. 7,281,985 for a Golf Club Head. The Callaway patent describes a golf club head which allows for the face angle, lie angle, loft angle, and shaft diameter of the golf club to be customized to a golfer. The customization of the face angle is accomplished by providing a golf club head with an insert for orientation of the golf club face angle following the manufacture of the golf club head.
Another example is Ralph Maltby Enterprises, Inc, U.S. Pat. No. 4,80,484 for Method of Fitting Golf Club to Golfer, which discloses the use of a soleplate which discloses a spherical roll sole toward the toe of a head and a runner toward the heel of the head. The face angle can be adjusted by grinding the runner to slope toward or away from the ball striking face of the head.
A further example is The Yokohama Rubber Co,. Ltd., U.S. Pat. No. 5,333,862, for a Wood Type Golf Club. The Yokohama patent discloses ideal ranges of angles for the face angle, lie angle, and angle of center of gravity, such that having a combination of such angles reduces the slice effect.
A further example is Callaway Golf, U.S. Pat. No. 6,475,100 for a Golf Club Head with Adjustable Face Angle. The Callaway Golf patent discloses a club head with an internal hosel and an insert disposed within that internal hosel. The insert allows for the face angle of the golf club to be oriented after manufacturing of the golf club head.
Yet a further example is Callaway Golf, U.S. Pat. No. 6,964,617 for a golf club head with gasket. This patent discloses a golf club head with a gasket. The gasket controls the face angle of the club head. The width of the gasket varies to provide an open face angle club head, a closed face angle club head, or a neutral face angle club head.
Still another example is Callaway Golf, U.S. Pat. No. 7,377,862 for a method for fitting a golf club. The Callaway patent discloses a golf club head that has different hosel section orientations which allow for different face angles.
Woods, and in particular drivers, have historically been designed such that the sole shape (surface contour) is defined for styling or turf interaction purposes. Further, the center of gravity has been positioned in a location relative to the face in order to preferentially affect trajectory of the golf ball. The relationship between the sole shape and center of gravity of the golf club determines the face angle at address (natural sole) for a sole shape having a single contact point at equilibrium. This relationship has not been fully understood and as a result the face angle at address may often be different than intended in the design model. Some golfers are very sensitive to the look of an “open” or especially “closed” club face at address and this factor may weigh heavily in a purchase decision.
The club head design in CAD may orient the head in CAD space such that the face angle is at the desired value. This orientation is arbitrarily constrained and is not necessarily representative of the orientation when a player addresses the club and allows it to find an equilibrium orientation.
Some wood heads may overcome this limitation by use of a dual keel point or multi-keel point sole shape. Sole shapes of this type often have undesired affects on styling and on sound from striking a ball.
As a driver is rotated thru a range of address lie angles the measured face angle will generally change by an amount related to the loft of the face at initial orientation and the range of lie angles rotated thru. For instance, a driver having a 10 degrees loft and 0 degree face angle (also known as “Square”) at a design lie angle of 56 degrees, will have a measured face angle that changes significantly (see
However, depending on the relative orientation of the club center of gravity (“CG”) and the sole surface in the vicinity of contact with the ground, the measured and perceived face angles may vary unexpectedly at different address lie angles. This is a problem with many current woods which can result in problems with acceptance in the market place. Some golfers won't even try a club that has a face angle they consider unappealing, regardless of the performance of the club. An example of the face angle behavior of such a club is shown in
It is apparent that the need exists for a golf club head with a stable face angle. Golfers want a golf club with an appealing face angle while golf equipment manufacturers need to provide as much standardization as possible in order to prevent escalation of manufacturing costs. Therefore, although prior art has presented many inventions for providing customization, the prior art has failed to provide a cost effective method for customization.
The present invention seeks to overcome the variability and uncertainty of face angle at address (natural sole) for a wood having a single keel point. Further, the club head design seeks to provide the intended perceived face angle regardless of the lie angle at which the player addresses the club, within a range of 40-55 degrees.
The present invention allows for a golf club head with a keel zone that affects the appearance of the face angle of the golf club. For example, the golf club has a measured face angle that changes significantly as lie angles change from 40 degrees to 60 degrees. However, because of the keel zone, the measured face angle is not perceived by the golfer as there is no rotation of the club head.
One aspect of the present invention is a golf club head. The golf club head includes a body and a keel zone. The body has a front portion, a crown portion and a sole portion. The body also has a heel end, a toe end and an aft end. The sole portion has a single keel point. The keel zone is located in the sole portion. The keel zone is located in the fore-aft direction by the equilibrium line. The keel zone is located in the heel-toe direction by the target lie angle. The keel zone preferably has a width of 0.50 inch in the fore-aft direction and 1.00 inch in the heel-toe direction.
Another aspect of the present invention is a golf club. The golf club includes a golf club head, a keel zone and a shaft. The golf club head includes a body having a front portion, a crown portion and a sole portion. The body also has a heel end, a toe end and an aft end. The sole portion has a single keel point. The keel zone is located in the fore-aft direction by the equilibrium line. The keel zone is located in the heel-toe direction by the target lie angle. The size of the keel zone is preferably 0.5 inch wide in the fore-aft direction and 1.0 inch wide in the heel-toe direction. The shaft is connected to the golf club head. The equilibrium line is defined as a line that runs from a point on the underside of the grip five inches below the butt end of the shaft through the club center of gravity and extending through the club head.
The golf club head preferably has a volume ranging from 200 cubic centimeters to 600 cubic centimeters, more preferable from 300 cubic centimeters to 500 cubic centimeters, and most preferably from 350 cubic centimeters to 480 cubic centimeters.
Having briefly described the present invention, the above and further objects, features and advantages thereof will be recognized by those skilled in the pertinent art from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The address lie angle may be very different for different golfers as shown in
As shown in
The sole surface within a defined proximity of the natural sole keel point (“keel zone”) is such that even if the club is addressed at different lie angles (40-60 degrees) the resulting perceived face angle will be constant within +/−0.5 degrees.
The “line of equilibrium” is preferably defined as a line that runs from a point on the underside of the grip at five inches below the butt end thru the club center of gravity and extending thru the head. The keel zone is defined relative to this line.
As shown in
This invention describes a keel zone on the sole of a club head located preferentially with respect to the club CG. Within this local prismatic surface the club head will contact the ground for any of a wide range of practical orientations (lie angles) at address. This causes the club to appear to have a stable face angle even when addressed at different lie angles.
As shown in
As shown in
In one embodiment, as shown in
The golf club head 20, when designed as a driver, preferably has a volume from 200 cubic centimeters to 600 cubic centimeters, more preferably from 300 cubic centimeters to 500 cubic centimeters, and most preferably from 350 cubic centimeters to 480 cubic centimeters. The volume of the golf club head 20 will also vary between fairway woods (preferably ranging from 3-woods to eleven woods) with smaller volumes than drivers. The golf club head 20 preferably has a mass no more than 225 grams, and most preferably a mass of 180 to 215 grams.
Preferably the golf club head 20 has a body 22 that is composed of titanium, titanium alloy, stainless steel or other iron-alloys. Alternatively, the body 22 may be composed of a lightweight metallic material, such as magnesium alloys, aluminum alloys, magnesium, aluminum or other low density metals.
Another embodiment of the golf club head 20 has a body 22 that is preferably composed of a face component, a body, and a gasket such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,964,617, entitled Golf Club Head with Gasket, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Another embodiment of the golf club head 20 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,475,100, for a Golf Club Head with Adjustable Face Angle, and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
FIG. X illustrates a golf club with a closed face angle. The golf club has a club head, a shaft with a grip attached at a butt end of the shaft. The keel zone makes the face angle of the golf club appear consistent at various lie angles.
a) illustrates a cross-sectional view of the golf club head, with the keel zone. The keel zone has a raised surface that remains consistent in the heel- toe direction.
In some embodiments, the heel end of the keel zone has a higher raised surface than the toe end. In other embodiments, the toe end of the alignment line has a higher raised surface than the heel end of the alignment line.
From the foregoing it is believed that those skilled in the pertinent art will recognize the meritorious advancement of this invention and will readily understand that while the present invention has been described in association with a preferred embodiment thereof, and other embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings, numerous changes, modifications and substitutions of equivalents may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention which is intended to be unlimited by the foregoing except as may appear in the following appended claims. Therefore, the embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined in the following appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/692,447, filed on Jan. 22, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/147,552, filed on Jan. 27, 2009, now abandoned, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3815921 | Turner | Jun 1974 | A |
| 5346217 | Tsuchiya et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 7163468 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7273419 | Evans et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7399237 | Evans et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7934999 | Cackett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8012034 | Cackett et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8123626 | Cackett et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8221258 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8262496 | Cackett et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8303429 | Cackett et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130059677 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61147552 | Jan 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12692447 | Jan 2010 | US |
| Child | 13668462 | US |
