1. Field of the Invention
This application generally relates to golf clubs, and in particular to universal type hosels and spacers for golf clubs that can be used to accommodate a plurality of different sized shafts.
2. Description of the Related Art
Golf clubs and golf club heads can come in many different forms and makes, such as wood- or metalwood-type (including drivers and fairway woods), iron-type (including wedge-type club heads), utility or specialty-type, and putter-type club heads.
The design and manufacture of golf clubs can require careful attention to club head construction. Among the many factors that can be considered are material selection, material treatment, structural integrity, and overall geometric design, including but not limited to shaft attachment design.
An aspect of at least one of the embodiments disclosed herein includes the realization that it is becoming more common for golfers to want to use specially sized shafts for their golf clubs. Club head shafts commonly come in three standard tip diameters. These are 0.335 inch (typically used for metal woods (“metals”), 0.350 inch (typically used for metals and hybrids), and 0.370 inch (typically used for irons and wedges). Additionally, some club heads have a tapered tip shaft, having a diameter of approximately 0.355 inch, with a taper rate of 0.0075 in/in over approximately a one inch length. However, with advances in technology, and with a desire for greater precision and performance, club head shafts are becoming more and more optimized for particular golfer needs. For example, some golfers may want to use a particular sized club head shaft for a given club head, while other golfers may want to use a different sized club head shaft for the same club. Similarly, a golfer may want to use a club head shaft size that is not commonly made, and/or may want to use a club head shaft size that is not currently anticipated for use with a particular club head, or particular club head set.
Complicating the problem is that golf club head hosels, which are designed to receive club head shafts, are typically designed to accommodate only a single specific club head shaft size. For example, the hosels of a set of iron clubs may typically accommodate one shaft size, while hosels of a set of woods may accommodate another shaft size. It is difficult to meet the demands of golfers, who want to use various sized club head shafts, when a club head hosel is designed only to meet one specific shaft size.
Overall, therefore, it would be advantageous to have a universal type hosel and/or spacer that can be used to accommodate a variety of different club head shafts. The universal type hosel and/or spacer can be implemented on an iron set, a wood set, a hybrid set, etc., and/or can be implemented as a universal feature on all club heads, such that every type of club head includes the same universal type hosel and/or spacer. The universal type hosel and/or spacer can thus reduce or eliminate the need for the manufacture of a different hosel for every specialized club head shaft.
Thus, in accordance with at least one embodiment, a golf club head can comprise a ball striking face, a sole, a crown, a hosel comprising a first hosel section comprising a first outer diameter, a first inner diameter, and a first length, a second hosel section located below the first hosel section, the second hosel section comprising a second outer diameter, a second inner diameter tapered inwardly from the first inner diameter, and a second length, a third hosel section located below the second hosel section, the third hosel section comprising a third outer diameter, a third inner diameter less than the first inner diameter, and a third length, a fourth hosel section located below the third hosel section, the fourth hosel section comprising a fourth outer diameter, a fourth inner diameter less than the third inner diameter, and a fourth length, the fourth hosel section further comprising a first upper ledge configured to support the end of a club head shaft, a fifth hosel section located below the fourth hosel section, the fifth hosel section comprising a fifth outer diameter, a fifth inner diameter less than the fourth inner diameter, and a fifth length, the fifth hosel section comprising a second upper ledge configured to support the end of a club head shaft, and a third lower ledge configured to support the end of a club head shaft.
In accordance with at least another embodiment, a golf club head can comprise a ball striking face, a sole, a crown, a hosel comprising a hosel body and a hosel opening in the hosel body, a club head shaft having a distal end, the distal end of the club head shaft located within the hosel opening, and a hosel spacer surrounding the distal end of the club head shaft within the hosel opening, the hosel spacer comprising a self-expanding structure within the hosel opening.
These and other features and advantages of the present embodiments will become more apparent upon reading the following detailed description and with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments, in which:
A golf club universal hosel and/or spacer is disclosed herein. The embodiments disclosed herein are described in the context for use with any type of club head, including but not limited to woods, fairways, hybrids, and irons.
With reference to
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, the hosel body 12 can comprise first radius R1 along a top end of the hosel body 12. The radius R1 can be approximately 0.5 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the radius R1 can range from approximately 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm. In some embodiments, the radius R1 can range from approximately 0.3 mm to 0.7 mm. The radius R1 can act to further help guide a club head shaft into the hosel opening 14.
With continued reference to
In some embodiments the hosel body 12 can include a second radius R2 located at a bottom of the second hosel section. The second radius R2 can be approximately 4.8 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the radius R2 can range from approximately 4 mm to 6 mm. In other embodiments, the radius R2 can range from approximately 3.5 mm to 6.5 mm. The radius R2 can act to further help guide a club head shaft into the hosel opening 14.
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, the length L3 can be approximately 12.7 mm to 29.21 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the length L3 can range from approximately 10 mm to 35 mm. In some embodiments the length L3 can range from approximately 15 mm to 25 mm.
With continued reference to
As described above, the fourth hosel section can have a length L4. The length L4 can be approximately 1.3 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the length L4 can range from approximately 1.2 mm to 1.4 mm. In some embodiments the length L4 can range from approximately 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm.
In some embodiments, the fourth hosel section can be configured to receive the end of a club head shaft that is smaller in diameter than inner diameter d3. For example, the fourth hosel section can be configured to receive the end of a club head shaft that has a diameter equal to or less than the diameter d4.
In some embodiments, the fourth hosel section can have a radius R4 formed along the hosel body 12. The radius R4 can be approximately 0.25 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the radius R4 can range from approximately 0.23 mm to 0.27 mm. In other embodiments, the radius R4 can range from approximately 0.21 mm to 0.29 mm. The radius R4 can act to further help guide a club head shaft into the hosel opening 14.
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, for example where a shaft diameter is less than the inner diameter d3, a layer of epoxy-like substance can be inserted into the hosel opening 14 and/or applied to the club head shaft. For example, if the club head shaft has a diameter less than inner diameter d3, and the end of the club head shaft sits on a lower ledge 18 of hosel 10, an epoxy (or another suitable substance) can be inserted into the remaining void(s) in the hosel opening 14. The epoxy can help to secure the club head shaft in place within the hosel opening 14.
With reference to
As described above, the fifth hosel section can have a length L5 measured from a distal end of the fourth hosel section. The length L5 can be approximately 12.7 mm to 25 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the length L5 can range from approximately 10 mm to 30 mm. In some embodiments the length L5 can range from approximately 15 mm to 20 mm.
In some embodiments, the fifth hosel section can have a radius R5 formed along the hosel body 12. The radius R5 can be approximately 0.5 mm, though other values and ranges are also possible. For example, in some embodiments the radius R5 can range from approximately 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm. In some embodiments the radius R5 can range from approximately 0.3 mm to 0.7 mm. The radius R5 can act to further help guide a club head shaft into the hosel opening 14.
The fifth hosel section can be used to receive and/or accommodate a club head shaft. For example, a club head shaft having a diameter equal to or less than d5 can be inserted into hosel opening 14, and the end of the club head shaft can rest on a ledge 20 of the hosel 10. In some embodiments, the ledge 20 can extend along the entire inner diameter d5. In some embodiments, a remaining portion or portions of the hosel opening 14 can be filled, for example, with an epoxy-like substance to help hold the club head shaft in place inside the hosel 10. Thus, at least in some embodiments, the hosel 10 can be configured to receive and accommodate at least three different sized club head shafts, based on the three different inner diameters d3, d4, and d5, and the ledges 16, 18, and 20 described above.
With reference to
For example, and with reference to
Without a spacer 22, it can be difficult at times to properly align a club head shaft 24 inside the hosel opening 14 to achieve a desired loft and/or lie angle. This can especially be true if the hosel opening 14 is a simple cylindrical bore hole that is larger than the club head shaft 24, and the club head shaft 24 tilts and/or moves within the hosel opening 14 prior to curing of an epoxy inside the hosel 10. It has been found that bond gaps, which are gaps located between the club head shaft 24 and the inside of the hosel 10 defined by the hosel opening 14, which are greater than about 0.005 inch in width, can cause the epoxy to rapidly lose its effectiveness, and can result in unwanted movement or misalignment of the club head shaft 24. Thus, using a spacer 22 can advantageously reduce the bond gap size inside a hosel 10, and create a more stable environment for aligning a club head shaft 24.
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, an epoxy-coated spacer 22 can be held or protected prior to curing of the epoxy, so that the spacer 22 can be inserted between the end of the club head shaft 24 and an internal wall of the body of the hosel 10 in the hosel opening 14. Once the club head shaft 24 has been inserted into the hosel opening 14, the epoxy can be cured, for example by heat, light, chemical catalyst, etc., thereby facilitating fastening of the club head shaft 24 to the hosel 10.
In some embodiments, the spacer 22 can be self-adjusting. For example, as described above, the spacer 22 can comprise a self-expanding stent-like device. The spacer 22 can be comprised of flexible and/or compressible material, such that the spacer 22 can expand radially outwardly relative to the club head shaft 24. When the spacer 22 is compressible, if the size of the club head shaft 24 changes, the spacer 22 can still advantageously fill a remaining bond gap inside the hosel 10.
In some embodiments the spacer 22 can have varying lengths. For example, in some embodiments the spacer 22 can extend nearly the entire distance between a top of the hosel opening 14 and a bottom of the hosel opening 14. In some embodiments, the spacer 22 can extend approximately half of the length between a top of the hosel opening 14 and the bottom of the hosel opening 14. In some embodiments, the spacer 22 can extend past the tip of the club head shaft 24.
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
The self-expanding nature of the spacer 22, along with its ability to retain predetermined amounts of adhesive for dispersal within the hosel opening 14, can advantageously permit the spacer 22 to be used with a variety of different hosel openings 14, and further to be used for example with the universal hosels described above and illustrated in
Overall, inserting a hosel spacer 22 can be an efficient way to both reduce gaps and create a snug fit between the club head shaft 24 and the internal walls of the hose 10, as well as to self-dispense epoxy within the hosel 18. In some embodiments, and as described above, the structure of the spacer 22 can be pre-coated with an epoxy for precision in self-dispensing a proper amount of epoxy within the hosel 10. It has been found that an optimum thickness (i.e. thickness extending in a radial direction inside the hosel 10) for the coating of epoxy on a spacer 22 can range from between 0.001 to 0.003 inches, though other ranges and values are also possible. In some embodiments a spacer 22 can be pre-coated with a thickness of expoxy that ranges from 0.0005 to 0.0035 inches. It has been found in some embodiments that if the epoxy thickness is greater than 0.003 inches, the epoxy can lose its strength. Therefore, at least in some embodiments, the epoxy thickness can be less than 0.003 inches.
Another advantage of a spacer 22 is that the pre-dispensed epoxy on the spacer 22 can be better for the environment and safer for the environment, since there is minimal, if any, waste of epoxy. In contrast, when epoxy is added after a spacer 22 has been inserted, it can be easy to inadvertently use more epoxy than is necessary, and/or to thereby create a product that will cause greater harm to the environment than necessary.
Additionally, in some embodiments, a lattice-like structure on a spacer 22 can allow the spacer 22 to be more light-weight than other spacers, thereby reducing cost and time in manufacturing. The light-weight, latticed nature of a spacer 22 can make it easier to sell and ship the spacers 22, and can further make it easier to apply the epoxy or other types of adhesive directly onto the spacer.
Furthermore, by using the universal hosel and/or spacers described above, a hosel opening 14 can self-center a multitude of shaft sizes consistently and accurately. To manage issues of slop (i.e. excess epoxy or other material that may drip to the bottom of a hosel opening 14), in some embodiments, and as described above, a plug or some other structure can be inserted at the bottom of the hosel opening 14. The plug other structure can comprise a structure that is light and has a minimal rigidity. In some embodiments, the addition of this plug or other structure can provide vibration damping benefits to the club head.
The universal hosel and/or spacer 10, 22 described above can be used to accommodate ease of transition between certain clubs and club sets. For example, an iron set and hybrid set can include the same universal hosel and/or set of spacers, thereby making it easy to switch out club head shafts and transition from one type of club head to another. The universal hosel and/or spacer can offer a level of both precision and efficiency in accommodating club head shafts that is not found in current club heads. By using the universal hosel and/or spacer, the club heads of a particular set (e.g. an iron set, wood set, hybrid set, etc.), or of an entire set, can be manufactured to have the same pre-drilled dimensions to receive a variety of different club head shafts 24. Thus, the universal hosel and/or spacer can be used to reduce the need to specially bore out specific dimensions for specially made club head shafts 24.
Although these inventions have been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present inventions extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the inventions and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while several variations of the inventions have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of these inventions, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments can be made and still fall within the scope of the inventions. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed inventions. Thus, it is intended that the scope of at least some of the present inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1444842 | Lagerblade | Feb 1923 | A |
1480056 | Flint | Jan 1924 | A |
1882509 | Lagerblade | Oct 1932 | A |
1892482 | Cash, Jr. | Dec 1932 | A |
2039320 | Kraeuter | May 1936 | A |
2452890 | Wolfram | Nov 1948 | A |
3172667 | Baker et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
4534558 | Yoneyama | Aug 1985 | A |
4917384 | Caiati | Apr 1990 | A |
5335909 | Green, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5439218 | Gondeck | Aug 1995 | A |
5505447 | Mockovak | Apr 1996 | A |
5575723 | Take et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586944 | Nagamoto et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5607363 | Chou | Mar 1997 | A |
5643105 | Niswander | Jul 1997 | A |
5643110 | Igarashi | Jul 1997 | A |
5688186 | Michaels et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688188 | Chappell | Nov 1997 | A |
5769307 | Takeda | Jun 1998 | A |
5857922 | Delio | Jan 1999 | A |
5863260 | Butler, Jr. et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5906549 | Kubica | May 1999 | A |
5938541 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954596 | Noble et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6059670 | Mogan | May 2000 | A |
6102274 | Nagamoto | Aug 2000 | A |
6206788 | Krenzler | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6257991 | Ortiz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287214 | Satoh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6352482 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368230 | Helmstetter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6431993 | Dyer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6561919 | Edel | May 2003 | B2 |
6620053 | Tseng | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652391 | Kubica et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6669573 | Wood et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679786 | McCabe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6817953 | Farmer | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855067 | Solheim et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887163 | Blankenship | May 2005 | B2 |
6890269 | Burrows | May 2005 | B2 |
7014568 | Pelz | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029402 | Nakajima | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7192361 | Gilbert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201668 | Pamias | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7207897 | Burch et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226364 | Helmstetter | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7273418 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281985 | Galloway | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7326126 | Holt et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347796 | Takeda | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351159 | Lai | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377862 | Galloway | May 2008 | B2 |
7413518 | Cole et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7427239 | Hocknell et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7553240 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7594862 | Gilbert | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7653980 | Vokey et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7658685 | Vokey et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7758449 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780549 | Park et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7803062 | Gilbert et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7846037 | Burnett et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8192299 | Sato et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010029208 | Takeda | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040018886 | Burrows | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050085313 | Nishitani | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096148 | Noble et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070135229 | Lo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173344 | Burch | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080045351 | Vokey et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080146373 | Takeda | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080280693 | Chai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090181792 | Burch | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090264217 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286619 | Beach et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090305812 | Nakamura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318243 | Golden et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325727 | Takeuchi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022323 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100029405 | Gilbert | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100035701 | Kusumoto | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087270 | Ban et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113180 | Nakamura | May 2010 | A1 |
20100190572 | Vokey et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100234123 | Sato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100279791 | Park et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285898 | Gilbert et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130029777 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |