The present application concerns golf club heads, and more particularly, golf club heads having unique relationships between the club head's mass moments of inertia and center-of-gravity position.
Center-of-gravity (CG) and mass moments of inertia critically affect a golf club head's performance, such as launch angle and flight trajectory on impact with a golf ball, among other characteristics.
A mass moment of inertia is a measure of a club head's resistance to twisting about the golf club head's center-of-gravity, for example on impact with a golf ball. In general, a moment of inertia of a mass about a given axis is proportional to the square of the distance of the mass away from the axis. In other words, increasing distance of a mass from a given axis results in an increased moment of inertia of the mass about that axis. Higher golf club head moments of inertia result in lower golf club head rotation on impact with a golf ball, particularly on “off-center” impacts with a golf ball, e.g., mis-hits. Lower rotation in response to a mis-hit results in a player's perception that the club head is forgiving. Generally, one measure of “forgiveness” can be defined as the ability of a golf club head to reduce the effects of mis-hits on flight trajectory and shot distance, e.g., hits resulting from striking the golf ball at a less than ideal impact location on the golf club head. Greater forgiveness of the golf club head generally equates to a higher probability of hitting a straight golf shot. Moreover, higher moments of inertia typically result in greater ball speed on impact with the golf club head, which can translate to increased golf shot distance.
Most fairway wood club heads are intended to hit the ball directly from the ground, e.g., the fairway, although many golfers also use fairway woods to hit a ball from a tee. Accordingly, fairway woods are subject to certain design constraints to maintain playability. For example, compared to typical drivers, which are usually designed to hit balls from a tee, fairway woods often have a relatively shallow head height, providing a low center of gravity and a smaller top view profile for reducing contact with the ground. Such fairway woods inspire confidence in golfers for hitting from the ground. Also, fairway woods typically have a higher loft than most drivers, although some drivers and fairway woods share similar lofts. For example, most fairway woods have a loft greater than or equal to about 13 degrees, and most drivers have a loft between about 7 degrees and about 15 degrees.
Faced with constraints such as those just described, golf club manufacturers often must choose to improve one performance characteristic at the expense of another. For example, some conventional golf club heads offer increased moments of inertia to promote forgiveness while at the same time incurring a higher than desired CG-position and increased club head height. Club heads with high CG and/or large height might perform well when striking a ball positioned on a tee, such is the case with a driver, but not when hitting from the turf. Thus, conventional golf club heads that offer increased moments of inertia for forgiveness often do not perform well as a fairway wood club head.
Although traditional fairway wood club heads generally have a low CG, such clubs usually also suffer from correspondingly low mass moments of inertia. In part due to their low CG, traditional fairway wood club heads offer acceptable launch angle and flight trajectory when the club head strikes the ball at or near the ideal impact location on the ball striking face. But because of their low mass moments of inertia, traditional fairway wood club heads are less forgiving than club heads with high moments of inertia, which heretofore have been drivers. As already noted, conventional golf club heads that have increased mass moments of inertia, and thus are more forgiving, have been ill-suited for use as fairway woods because of their high CG.
Accordingly, to date, golf club designers and manufacturers have not offered golf club heads with high moments of inertia for improved forgiveness and low center-of-gravity for playing a ball positioned on turf.
This application discloses, among other innovations, fairway wood-type golf club heads that provide improved forgiveness and playability.
The following describes golf club heads that include a body defining an interior cavity, a sole portion positioned at a bottom portion of the golf club head, a crown portion positioned at a top portion, and a skirt portion positioned around a periphery between the sole and crown. The body also has a forward portion and a rearward portion and a maximum above ground height.
Golf club heads according to a first aspect have a body height less than about 46 mm and a crown thickness less than about 0.65 mm throughout more than about 70% of the crown. The above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less than about 19 mm and a moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity z-axis, Izz, is greater than about 300 kg-mm2.
Some club heads according to the first aspect provide an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 16 mm. Some have a loft angle greater than about 13 degrees. A moment of inertia about a golf club head center-of-gravity x-axis, Ixx, can be greater than about 170 kg-mm2. A golf club head volume can be less than about 240 cm3. A front to back depth (Dch) of the club head can be greater than about 85 mm.
Golf club heads according to a second aspect have a body height less than about 46 mm and the face has a loft angle greater than about 13 degrees. An above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less than about 19 mm, and satisfies, together with a moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity z-axis, Izz, the relationship Izz≧13·Zup+105.
According to the second aspect, the above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, can be less than about 16 mm. The volume of the golf club head can be less than about 240 cm3. A front to back depth (Dch) of the club head can be greater than about 85 mm. The crown can have a thickness less than about 0.65 mm over at least about 70% of the crown.
According to a third aspect, the crown has a thickness less than about 0.65 mm for at least about 70% of the crown, the golf club head has a front to back depth (Dch) greater than about 85 mm, and an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less than about 19 mm. A moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity z-axis, Izz, specified in units of kg-mm2, a moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity x-axis, Ixx, specified in units of kg-mm2, and, the above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units of millimeters, together satisfy the relationship Ixx+Izz≧20·Zup+165.
In some instances, the above ground center-of-gravity above ground location, Zup, and the moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, Izz, specified in units of kg-mm2, together satisfy the relationship Izz≧13·Zup+105. In some embodiments, the moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, Izz, exceeds one or more of 300 kg-mm2, 320 kg-mm2, 340 kg-mm2, and 360 kg-mm2. The moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity x-axis, Ixx, can exceed one or more of 150 kg-mm2, 170 kg-mm2, and 190 kg-mm2.
Some golf club heads according to the third aspect also include one or more weight ports formed in the body and at least one weight configured to be retained at least partially within one of the one or more weight ports. The face can have a loft angle in excess of about 13 degrees. The golf club head can have a volume less than about 240 cm3. The body can be substantially formed from a steel alloy, a titanium alloy, a graphitic composite, and/or a combination thereof. In some instances, the body is substantially formed as an investment casting. In some instances, the maximum height is less than one or more of about 46 mm, about 42 mm, and about 38 mm.
In golf club heads according to a fourth aspect, the crown has a thickness less than about 0.65 mm for at least about 70% of the crown, a front to back depth (Dch) is greater than about 85 mm, and an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, is less than about 19 mm. In addition, a moment of inertia about a center-of-gravity x-axis, Ixx, specified in units of kg-mm2, and the above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units of millimeters, together satisfy the relationship Ixx≧7·Zup+60.
In some instances, the above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, and the moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, specified in units of kg-mm2, together satisfy the relationship Izz≧13·Zup+105.
The moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity z-axis, Izz, can exceed one or more of 300 kg-mm2, 320 kg-mm2, 340 kg-mm2, and 360 kg-mm2. The moment of inertia about the center-of-gravity x-axis, Ixx, can exceed one or more of 150 kg-mm2, 170 kg-mm2, and 190 kg-mm2.
Some embodiments according to the fourth aspect also include one or more weight ports formed in the body and at least one weight configured to be retained at least partially within one of the one or more weight ports.
According to the fourth aspect, the face can have a loft angle in excess of about 13 degrees. The golf club head can have a volume less than about 240 cm3. The body can be substantially formed from a selected material from a steel alloy, a titanium alloy, a graphitic composite, and/or a combination thereof. In some instances, the body is substantially formed as an investment casting. The maximum height of some club heads according to the fourth aspect is less than one or more of about 46 mm, about 42 mm, and about 38 mm.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the golf club head will become more apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.
The following describes embodiments of golf club heads for fairway woods that incorporate increased moments of inertia and low centers of gravity relative to fairway wood golf club heads that have come before.
The following makes reference to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, wherein like numerals designate like parts throughout. The drawings illustrate specific embodiments, but other embodiments may be formed and structural changes may be made without departing from the intended scope of this disclosure. Directions and references (e.g., up, down, top, bottom, left, right, rearward, forward, heelward, etc.) may be used to facilitate discussion of the drawings but are not intended to be limiting. For example, certain terms may be used such as “up,” “down,”, “upper,” “lower,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “left,” “right,” and the like. These terms are used, where applicable, to provide some clarity of description when dealing with relative relationships, particularly with respect to the illustrated embodiments. Such terms are not, however, intended to imply absolute relationships, positions, and/or orientations. For example, with respect to an object, an “upper” surface can become a “lower” surface simply by turning the object over. Nevertheless, it is still the same object.
Accordingly, the following detailed description shall not to be construed in a limiting sense and the scope of property rights sought shall be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Normal Address Position
Club heads and many of their physical characteristics disclosed herein will be described using “normal address position” as the club head reference position, unless otherwise indicated.
As used herein, “normal address position” means the club head position wherein a vector normal to the club face 18 substantially lies in a first vertical plane (i.e., a vertical plane is perpendicular to the ground plane 17), the centerline axis 21 of the club shaft substantially lies in a second vertical plane, and the first vertical plane and the second vertical plane substantially perpendicularly intersect.
Club Head
A fairway wood-type golf club head, such as the golf club head 2, includes a hollow body 10 defining a crown portion 12, a sole portion 14 and a skirt portion 16. A striking face, or face portion, 18 attaches to the body 10. The body 10 can include a hosel 20, which defines a hosel bore 24 adapted to receive a golf club shaft. The body 10 further includes a heel portion 26, a toe portion 28, a front portion 30, and a rear portion 32.
The club head 2 also has a volume, typically measured in cubic-centimeters (cm3), equal to the volumetric displacement of the club head 2, assuming any apertures are sealed by a substantially planar surface. In some implementations, the golf club head 2 has a volume between approximately 120 cm3 and approximately 240 cm3, and a total mass between approximately 185 g and approximately 245 g. In a specific implementation, the golf club head 2 has a volume of approximately 181 cm3 and a total mass of approximately 216 g.
As used herein, “crown” means an upper portion of the club head above a peripheral outline 34 of the club head as viewed from a top-down direction and rearward of the topmost portion of a ball striking surface 22 of the striking face 18 (see e.g.,
As used herein, “sole” means a lower portion of the club head 2 extending upwards from a lowest point of the club head when the club head is at normal address position. In some implementations, the sole 14 extends approximately 50% to 60% of the distance from the lowest point of the club head to the crown 12, which in some instances, can be approximately 10 mm and 12 mm for a fairway wood. For example,
In other implementations, the sole 14 extends upwardly from the lowest point of the golf club head 10 a shorter distance than the sole 14 of golf club head 2. For example, in some implementations, the sole 14 extends upwardly approximately 50% to 60% of the distance from the lowest point of the club head 10 to the crown 12, which in some instances, can be between approximately 10 mm and approximately 12 mm for a fairway wood. Further, the sole 14 can define a substantially flat portion extending substantially horizontally relative to the ground 17 when in normal address position. In some implementations, the bottommost portion of the sole 14 extends substantially parallel to the ground 17 between approximately 5% and approximately 70% of the depth (Dch) of the golf club head 10.
As used herein, “skirt” means a side portion of the club head 2 between the crown 12 and the sole 14 that extends across a periphery 34 of the club head, excluding the striking surface 22, from the toe portion 28, around the rear portion 32, to the heel portion 26.
As used herein, “striking surface” means a front or external surface of the striking face 18 configured to impact a golf ball (not shown). In several embodiments, the striking face or face portion 18 can be a striking plate attached to the body 10 using conventional attachment techniques, such as welding, as will be described in more detail below. In some embodiments, the striking surface 22 can have a bulge and roll curvature. For example, referring to
The body 10 can be made from a metal alloy (e.g., an alloy of titanium, an alloy of steel, an alloy of aluminum, and/or an alloy of magnesium), a composite material, such as a graphitic composite, a ceramic material, or any combination thereof. The crown 12, sole 14, and skirt 16 can be integrally formed using techniques such as molding, cold forming, casting, and/or forging and the striking face 18 can be attached to the crown, sole and skirt by known means.
For example, the striking face 18 can be attached to the body 10 as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0239575 and 2004/0235584.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the striking face 18 is made of a composite material such as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2005/0239575 and 2004/0235584, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/642,310, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/877,336, which are incorporated herein by reference. In other embodiments, the striking face 18 is made from a metal alloy (e.g., an alloy of titanium, steel, aluminum, and/or magnesium), ceramic material, or a combination of composite, metal alloy, and/or ceramic materials.
When at normal address position, the club head 2 is disposed at a lie-angle 19 relative to the club shaft axis 21 and the club face has a loft angle 15 (
Golf Club Head Coordinates
Referring to
The head origin coordinate system defined with respect to the head origin 60 includes three axes: a z-axis 65 extending through the head origin 60 in a generally vertical direction relative to the ground 17 when the club head 2 is at normal address position; an x-axis 70 extending through the head origin 60 in a toe-to-heel direction generally parallel to the striking surface 22, e.g., generally tangential to the striking surface 22 at the ideal impact location 23, and generally perpendicular to the z-axis 65; and a y-axis 75 extending through the head origin 60 in a front-to-back direction and generally perpendicular to the x-axis 70 and to the z-axis 65. The x-axis 70 and the y-axis 75 both extend in generally horizontal directions relative to the ground 17 when the club head 2 is at normal address position. The x-axis 70 extends in a positive direction from the origin 60 to the heel 26 of the club head 2. The y-axis 75 extends in a positive direction from the origin 60 towards the rear portion 32 of the club head 2. The z-axis 65 extends in a positive direction from the origin 60 towards the crown 12.
An alternative, above ground, club head coordinate system places the origin 60 at the intersection of the z-axis 65 and the ground plane 17, providing positive z-axis coordinates for every club head feature.
As used herein, “Zup” means the CG z-axis location determined according to the above ground coordinate system. Zup generally refers to the height of the CG 50 above the ground plane 17.
In one embodiment, the golf club head can have a CG with an x-axis coordinate between approximately −2.0 mm and approximately 6.0 mm, a y-axis coordinate between approximately 20 mm and approximately 40 mm, a z-axis coordinate between approximately 0.0 mm and approximately −6.0 mm. In certain embodiments, a z-axis coordinate between about 0.0 mm and about −6.0 mm provides a Zup value of between approximately 10 mm and 16 mm. Referring to
Another alternative coordinate system uses the club head center-of-gravity (CG) 50 as the origin when the club head 2 is at normal address position. Each center-of-gravity axis passes through the CG 50. For example, the CG x-axis 90 passes through the center-of-gravity 50 substantially parallel to the ground plane 17 and generally parallel to the origin x-axis 70 when the club head is at normal address position. Similarly, the CG y-axis 95 passes through the center-of-gravity 50 substantially parallel to the ground plane 17 and generally parallel to the origin y-axis 75, and the CG z-axis 85 passes through the center-of-gravity 50 substantially perpendicular to the ground plane 17 and generally parallel to the origin z-axis 65 when the club head is at normal address position.
Mass Moments of Inertia
Referring to
For example, a moment of inertia about the golf club head CG z-axis 85 can be calculated by the following equation
Izz=∫(x2+y2)dm (2)
where x is the distance from a golf club head CG yz-plane to an infinitesimal mass, dm, and y is the distance from the golf club head CG xz-plane to the infinitesimal mass, dm. The golf club head CG yz-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG y-axis 95 and the golf club head CG z-axis 85.
The moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is an indication of the ability of a golf club head to resist twisting about the CG z-axis. Greater moments of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) provide the golf club head 2 with greater forgiveness on toe-ward or heel-ward off-center impacts with a golf ball. In other words, a golf ball hit by a golf club head on a location of the striking surface 18 between the toe 28 and the ideal impact location 23 tends to cause the golf club head to twist rearwardly and the golf ball to draw (e.g., to have a curving trajectory from right-to-left for a right-handed swing). Similarly, a golf ball hit by a golf club head on a location of the striking surface 18 between the heel 26 and the ideal impact location 23 causes the golf club head to twist forwardly and the golf ball to slice (e.g., to have a curving trajectory from left-to-right for a right-handed swing). Increasing the moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) reduces forward or rearward twisting of the golf club head, reducing the negative effects of heel or toe mis-hits.
A moment of inertia about the golf club head CG x-axis 90 can be calculated by the following equation
Ixx=∫(y2+z2)dm (1)
where y is the distance from a golf club head CG xz-plane to an infinitesimal mass, dm, and z is the distance from a golf club head CG xy-plane to the infinitesimal mass, dm. The golf club head CG xz-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG x-axis 90 and the golf club head CG z-axis 85. The CG xy-plane is a plane defined by the golf club head CG x-axis 90 and the golf club head CG y-axis 95.
As the moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is an indication of the ability of a golf club head to resist twisting about the CG z-axis, the moment of inertia about the CG x-axis (Ixx) is an indication of the ability of the golf club head to resist twisting about the CG x-axis. Greater moments of inertia about the CG x-axis (Ixx) improve the forgiveness of the golf club head 2 on high and low off-center impacts with a golf ball. In other words, a golf ball hit by a golf club head on a location of the striking surface 18 above the ideal impact location 23 causes the golf club head to twist upwardly and the golf ball to have a higher trajectory than desired. Similarly, a golf ball hit by a golf club head on a location of the striking surface 18 below the ideal impact location 23 causes the golf club head to twist downwardly and the golf ball to have a lower trajectory than desired. Increasing the moment of inertia about the CG x-axis (Ixx) reduces upward and downward twisting of the golf club head 2, reducing the negative effects of high and low mis-hits.
Discretionary Mass
Desired club head mass moments of inertia can be attained by distributing club head mass to particular locations. Discretionary mass generally refers to the mass of material that can be removed from various structures providing mass that can be distributed elsewhere for tuning one or more mass moments of inertia and/or locating the club head center-of-gravity.
Club head walls provide one source of discretionary mass. In other words, a reduction in wall thickness reduces the wall mass and provides mass that can be distributed elsewhere. For example, in some implementations, one or more walls of the club head can have a thickness less than approximately 0.7 mm, such as between about 0.55 mm and about 0.65 mm. In some embodiments, the crown 12 can have a thickness of approximately 0.65 mm throughout more than about 70% of the crown. See for example
Thin walls, particularly a thin crown 12, provide significant discretionary mass compared to conventional club heads. For example, a club head 2 made from an alloy of steel can achieve about 4 grams of discretionary mass for each 0.1 mm reduction in average crown thickness. Similarly, a club head 2 made from an alloy of titanium can achieve about 2.5 grams of discretionary mass for each 0.1 mm reduction in average crown thickness. Discretionary mass achieved using a thin crown 12, e.g., less than about 0.65 mm, can be used to tune one or more mass moments of inertia and/or center-of-gravity location.
For example,
To achieve a thin wall on the club head body 10, such as a thin crown 12, a club head body 10 can be formed from an alloy of steel or an alloy of titanium. Thin wall investment casting, such as gravity casting in air for alloys of steel (
Referring to
Alternatively, a thin crown made from an alloy of titanium. In some embodiments of a titanium casting process, modifying the gating provides improved flow of molten titanium, aiding in casting thin crowns. For further details concerning titanium casting, please refer to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/648,013, incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the casting mold can be heated (1006) to between about 620 degrees Fahrenheit and about 930 degrees, such as about 720 degrees. The casting can be rotated in a centrifuge (1004) at a rotational speed between about 200 RPM and about 800 RPM, such as about 500 RPM. Molten titanium can be heated (1002) to between about 3000 degrees Fahrenheit and about 3750 degrees Fahrenheit, such as between about 3025 degrees Fahrenheit and about 3075 degrees Fahrenheit. Molten titanium can be cast in the mold (1010) and the cast body can be cooled and/or heat treated (1012). The cast titanium body 10 can be extracted from the mold (1014) prior to applying secondary machining operations or attaching the striking face.
Weights and Weight Ports
Various approaches can be used for positioning discretionary mass within a golf club head. For example, many club heads have integral sole weight pads cast into the head at predetermined locations that can be used to lower the club head's center-of-gravity. Also, epoxy can be added to the interior of the club head through the club head's hosel opening to obtain a desired weight distribution. Alternatively, weights formed of high-density materials can be attached to the sole, skirt, and other parts of a club head. With such methods of distributing the discretionary mass, installation is critical because the club head endures significant loads during impact with a golf ball that can dislodge the weight. Accordingly, such weights are usually permanently attached to the club head and are limited to a fixed total mass, which of course, permanently fixes the club head's center-of-gravity and moments of inertia.
Alternatively, the golf club head 2 can define one or more weight ports 40 formed in the body 10 that are configured to receive one or more weights. For example, one or more weight ports can be disposed in the crown 12, skirt 16 and/or sole 14. The weight port 40 can have any of a number of various configurations to receive and retain any of a number of weights or weight assemblies, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/066,720 and 11/065,772, which are incorporated herein by reference. For example,
Inclusion of one or more weights in the weight port(s) 40 provides a customizable club head mass distribution, and corresponding mass moments of inertia and center-of-gravity 50 locations. Adjusting the location of the weight port(s) 40 and the mass of the weights and/or weight assemblies provides various possible locations of center-of-gravity 50 and various possible mass moments of inertia using the same club head 2.
As discussed in more detail below, a playable fairway wood club head can have a low, rearward center-of-gravity. Placing a weight port rearward in the sole helps desirably locate the center-of-gravity. Although other methods (e.g., using internal weights attached using epoxy or hot-melt glue) of adjusting the center-of-gravity can be used, use of a weight port reduces undesirable effects on the audible tone emitted during impact with a golf ball.
Club Head Height and Length
In addition to redistributing mass within a particular club head envelope as discussed immediately above, the club head center-of-gravity location 50 can also be tuned by modifying the club head external envelope. For example, the club head body 10 can be extended rearwardly, and the overall height can be reduced.
Referring now to
In some embodiments, the fairway wood golf club head 2 has a height (Hch) less than approximately 50 mm. In some embodiments, the club head 2 has a height (Hch) less than about 35 mm. For example, some implementations of the golf club head 2 have a height (Hch) less than about 38 mm. In other implementations, the golf club head 2 has a height (Hch) less than about 42 mm. Still other implementations of the golf club head 2 have a height (Hch) less than about 46 mm.
Some examples of the golf club head 2 have a depth (Dch) greater than approximately 75 mm. For example, as discussed in more detail below, the golf club head 2 can have a depth (Dch) greater than about 85 mm.
Forgiveness of Fairway Woods
Golf club head “forgiveness” generally describes the ability of a club head to deliver a desirable golf ball trajectory despite a mis-hit. As described above, large mass moments of inertia contribute to the overall forgiveness of a golf club head. In addition, a low center-of-gravity improves forgiveness for golf club heads used to strike a ball from the turf by giving a higher launch angle and a lower spin trajectory (which improves the distance of a fairway wood golf shot). Providing a rearward center-of-gravity reduces the likelihood of a slice or fade for many golfers. Accordingly, forgiveness of fairway wood club heads, such as the club head 2, can be improved using the techniques described above to achieve high moments of inertia and low center-of-gravity compared to conventional fairway wood golf club heads.
For example, a club head 2 with a crown thickness less than about 0.65 mm throughout at least about 70% of the crown can provide significant discretionary mass. A 0.60 mm thick crown can provide as much as about 8 grams of discretionary mass compared to a 0.80 mm thick crown. The large discretionary mass can be distributed to improve the mass moments of inertia and desirably locate the club head center-of-gravity. Generally, discretionary mass should be located sole-ward rather than crown-ward to maintain a low center-of-gravity, and rearward rather than forward to maintain a rearwardly positioned center-of-gravity. In addition, discretionary mass should be located far from the center-of-gravity and near the perimeter of the club head to maintain high mass moments of inertia.
For example, a comparatively forgiving golf club head 2 for a fairway wood can combine an overall club head height (Ho) of less than about 46 mm and an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 19 mm. Some examples of the club head 2 provide an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 16 mm.
In addition, a thin crown 12 as described above provides sufficient discretionary mass to allow the club head 2 to have a volume less than about 240 cm3 and/or a front to back depth (Dch) greater than about 85 mm. Without a thin crown 12, a similarly sized golf club head would either be overweight or would have an undesirably located center-of-gravity because less discretionary mass would be available to tune the CG location.
In addition, discretionary mass can be distributed to provide a mass moment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, Izz, greater than about 300 kg-mm2. In some instances, the mass moment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, Izz, can be greater than about 320 kg-mm2, such as greater than about 340 kg-mm2 or greater than about 360 kg-mm2. Distribution of the discretionary mass can also provide a mass moment of inertia about the CG x-axis 90, Ixx, greater than about 150 kg-mm2. In some instances, the mass moment of inertia about the CG x-axis 85, Ixx, can be greater than about 170 kg-mm2, such as greater than about 190 kg-mm2.
Alternatively, some examples of a forgiving club head 2 combine an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, less than about 19 mm and a high moment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, Izz. In such club heads, the moment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, Izz, specified in units of kg-mm2, together with the above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units of millimeters (mm), can satisfy the relationship
Izz≧13·Zup+105.
Alternatively, some forgiving fairway wood club heads have a moment of inertia about the CG z-axis 85, Izz, and a moment of inertia about the CG x-axis 90, Ixx, specified in units of kg-mm2, together with an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units of millimeters, that satisfy the relationship
Ixx+Izz≧20·Zup+165.
As another alternative, a forgiving fairway wood club head can have a moment of inertia about the CG x-axis, Ixx, specified in units of kg-mm2, and, an above ground center-of-gravity location, Zup, specified in units of millimeters, that together satisfy the relationship
Ixx≧7·Zup+60.
Table 1 summarizes characteristics of two exemplary 3-wood club heads that embody one or more of the above described aspects. In particular, the exemplary club heads achieve desirably low centers of gravity in combination with high mass moments of inertia.
Club heads formed according to the Example 1 embodiment are formed largely of an alloy of steel. As indicated by Table 1 and depending on the manufacturing tolerances achieved, the mass of club heads according to Example 1 is between about 210 g and about 220 grams and the Zup dimension is between about 13 mm and about 17 mm. As designed, the mass of the Example 1 design is 216.1 g and the Zup dimension 15.2 mm. The loft is about 16 degrees, the overall club head height is about 38 mm, and the head depth is about 87 mm. The crown is about 0.60 mm thick. The relatively large head depth in combination with a thin and light crown provides significant discretionary mass for redistribution to improve forgiveness and overall playability. For example, the resulting mass moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is about 325 kg-mm2.
Club heads formed according to the Example 2 embodiment are formed largely of an alloy of titanium. As indicated by Table 1 and depending on the manufacturing tolerances achieved, the mass of club heads according to Example 2 is between about 210 g and about 220 grams and the Zup dimension is between about 13 mm and about 17 mm. As designed, the mass of the Example 2 design is 213.8 g and the Zup dimension 14.8 mm. The loft is about 15 degrees, the overall club head height is about 40.9 mm, and the head depth is about 97.4 mm. The crown is about 0.80 mm thick. The relatively large head depth in combination with a thin and light crown provides significant discretionary mass for redistribution to improve forgiveness and overall playability. For example, the resulting mass moment of inertia about the CG z-axis (Izz) is about 302 kg-mm2.
Both of these examples provide improved playability compared to conventional fairway woods, in part by providing desirable combinations of low CG position, e.g., a Zup dimension less than about 16 mm, and high moments of inertia, e.g., Izz greater than about 300 kg-mm2, Ixx greater than about 170 kg-mm2, and a shallow head height, e.g., less than about 46 mm. Such examples are possible, in part, because they incorporate an increased head depth, e.g, greater than about 85 mm, in combination with a thinner, lighter crown compared to conventional fairway woods. These features provide significant discretionary mass for achieving desirable characteristics, such as, for example, high moments of inertia and low CG.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the disclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the illustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, the scope of the invention is defined by the following claims. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit of these claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/781,727, filed May 17, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,887,434 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/011,211, filed Jan. 23, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,753,806, which claims the benefit of provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 61/009,743, filed Dec. 31, 2007. These prior related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
411000 | Anderson | Sep 1889 | A |
1133129 | Govan | Mar 1915 | A |
1518316 | Ellingham | Dec 1924 | A |
1526438 | Scott | Feb 1925 | A |
1538312 | Beat | May 1925 | A |
1592463 | Marker | Jul 1926 | A |
1658581 | Tobia | Feb 1928 | A |
1704119 | Buhrke | Mar 1929 | A |
1970409 | Wiedemann | Aug 1934 | A |
D107007 | Cashmore | Nov 1937 | S |
2214356 | Wettlaufer | Sep 1940 | A |
2225930 | Sexton | Dec 1940 | A |
2360364 | Reach | Oct 1944 | A |
2375249 | Richer | May 1945 | A |
2460435 | Schaffer | Feb 1949 | A |
2681523 | Sellers | Jun 1954 | A |
3064980 | Steiner | Nov 1962 | A |
3466047 | Rodia et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3486755 | Hodge | Dec 1969 | A |
3556533 | Hollis | Jan 1971 | A |
3589731 | Chancellor | Jun 1971 | A |
3606327 | Gorman | Sep 1971 | A |
3610630 | Glover | Oct 1971 | A |
3652094 | Glover | Mar 1972 | A |
3672419 | Fischer | Jun 1972 | A |
3692306 | Glover | Sep 1972 | A |
3743297 | Dennis | Jul 1973 | A |
3897066 | Belmont | Jul 1975 | A |
3976299 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3979122 | Belmont | Sep 1976 | A |
3979123 | Belmont | Sep 1976 | A |
4008896 | Gordos | Feb 1977 | A |
4043563 | Churchward | Aug 1977 | A |
4052075 | Daly | Oct 1977 | A |
4076254 | Nygren | Feb 1978 | A |
4085934 | Churchward | Apr 1978 | A |
4121832 | Ebbing | Oct 1978 | A |
4150702 | Holmes | Apr 1979 | A |
4189976 | Becker | Feb 1980 | A |
4214754 | Zebelean | Jul 1980 | A |
4262562 | MacNeill | Apr 1981 | A |
D259698 | MacNeill | Jun 1981 | S |
4340229 | Stuff, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4411430 | Dian | Oct 1983 | A |
4423874 | Stuff, Jr. | Jan 1984 | A |
4438931 | Motomiya | Mar 1984 | A |
4489945 | Kobayashi | Dec 1984 | A |
4530505 | Stuff | Jul 1985 | A |
D284346 | Masters | Jun 1986 | S |
4602787 | Sugioka et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4607846 | Perkins | Aug 1986 | A |
4712798 | Preato | Dec 1987 | A |
4730830 | Tilley | Mar 1988 | A |
4736093 | Braly | Apr 1988 | A |
4754977 | Sahm | Jul 1988 | A |
4762322 | Molitor et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4795159 | Nagamoto | Jan 1989 | A |
4803023 | Enomoto et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4867457 | Lowe | Sep 1989 | A |
4867458 | Sumikawa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4869507 | Sahm | Sep 1989 | A |
4895371 | Bushner | Jan 1990 | A |
4915558 | Muller | Apr 1990 | A |
4962932 | Anderson | Oct 1990 | A |
4994515 | Washiyama et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5006023 | Kaplan | Apr 1991 | A |
5020950 | Ladouceur | Jun 1991 | A |
5028049 | McKeighen | Jul 1991 | A |
5039267 | Wollar | Aug 1991 | A |
5050879 | Sun et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058895 | Igarashi | Oct 1991 | A |
5078400 | Desbiolles et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5121922 | Harsh, Sr. | Jun 1992 | A |
5122020 | Bedi | Jun 1992 | A |
5244210 | Au | Sep 1993 | A |
5251901 | Solheim et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5253869 | Dingle et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
D343558 | Latraverse et al. | Jan 1994 | S |
5297794 | Lu | Mar 1994 | A |
5316305 | McCabe | May 1994 | A |
5320005 | Hsiao | Jun 1994 | A |
5328176 | Lo | Jul 1994 | A |
5346217 | Tsuchiya et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5385348 | Wargo | Jan 1995 | A |
5395113 | Antonious | Mar 1995 | A |
5410798 | Lo | May 1995 | A |
5421577 | Kobayashi | Jun 1995 | A |
5429365 | McKeighen | Jul 1995 | A |
5439222 | Kranenberg | Aug 1995 | A |
5441274 | Clay | Aug 1995 | A |
5447309 | Vincent | Sep 1995 | A |
5449260 | Whittle | Sep 1995 | A |
D365615 | Shimatani | Dec 1995 | S |
5518243 | Redman | May 1996 | A |
5533730 | Ruvang | Jul 1996 | A |
5564705 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571053 | Lane | Nov 1996 | A |
5582553 | Ashcraft et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613917 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620379 | Borys | Apr 1997 | A |
5624331 | Lo et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629475 | Chastonay | May 1997 | A |
5632694 | Lee | May 1997 | A |
5658206 | Antonious | Aug 1997 | A |
5669827 | Nagamoto | Sep 1997 | A |
5683309 | Reimers | Nov 1997 | A |
5688189 | Bland | Nov 1997 | A |
5709613 | Sheraw | Jan 1998 | A |
5718641 | Lin | Feb 1998 | A |
5720674 | Galy | Feb 1998 | A |
D392526 | Nicely | Mar 1998 | S |
5746664 | Reynolds, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5755627 | Yamazaki et al. | May 1998 | A |
5762567 | Antonious | Jun 1998 | A |
5766095 | Antonious | Jun 1998 | A |
5769737 | Holladay et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776010 | Helmstetter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776011 | Su et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788587 | Tseng | Aug 1998 | A |
5798587 | Lee | Aug 1998 | A |
RE35955 | Lu | Nov 1998 | E |
5851160 | Rugge et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
D409463 | McMullin | May 1999 | S |
5908356 | Nagamoto | Jun 1999 | A |
5911638 | Parente et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913735 | Kenmi | Jun 1999 | A |
5916042 | Reimers | Jun 1999 | A |
D412547 | Fong | Aug 1999 | S |
5935019 | Yamamoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5935020 | Stites et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941782 | Cook | Aug 1999 | A |
5947840 | Ryan | Sep 1999 | A |
5967905 | Nakahara et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971867 | Galy | Oct 1999 | A |
5976033 | Takeda | Nov 1999 | A |
5997415 | Wood | Dec 1999 | A |
6015354 | Ahn et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017177 | Lanham | Jan 2000 | A |
6019686 | Gray | Feb 2000 | A |
6023891 | Robertson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032677 | Blechman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033318 | Drajan, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6033321 | Yamamoto | Mar 2000 | A |
6056649 | Imai | May 2000 | A |
6062988 | Yamamoto | May 2000 | A |
6077171 | Yoneyama | Jun 2000 | A |
6089994 | Sun | Jul 2000 | A |
6123627 | Antonious | Sep 2000 | A |
6149533 | Finn | Nov 2000 | A |
6162132 | Yoneyama | Dec 2000 | A |
6162133 | Peterson | Dec 2000 | A |
6171204 | Starry | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186905 | Kosmatka | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190267 | Marlowe et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193614 | Sasamoto et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203448 | Yamamoto | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206789 | Takeda | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206790 | Kubica et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210290 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217461 | Galy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238303 | Fite | May 2001 | B1 |
6244974 | Hanberry, Jr. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248025 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254494 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264414 | Hartmann et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270422 | Fisher | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277032 | Smith | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290609 | Takeda | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296579 | Robinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299547 | Kosmatka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306048 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6334817 | Ezawa et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338683 | Kosmatka | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340337 | Hasebe et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6348012 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348014 | Chiu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364788 | Helmstetter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379264 | Forzano | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379265 | Hirakawa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383090 | O'Doherty et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6386987 | Lejeune, Jr. | May 2002 | B1 |
6386990 | Reyes et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390933 | Galloway | May 2002 | B1 |
6409612 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425832 | Cackett et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6434811 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436142 | Paes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440009 | Guibaud et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440010 | Deshmukh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443851 | Liberatore | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458044 | Vincent et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461249 | Liberatore | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471604 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475101 | Burrows | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6475102 | Helmstetter et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491592 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508978 | Deshmukh | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514154 | Finn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524197 | Boone | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524198 | Takeda | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527649 | Neher et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530848 | Gillig | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533679 | McCabe et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547676 | Cackett et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565448 | Cameron et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6565452 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6569029 | Hamburger | May 2003 | B1 |
6569040 | Bradstock | May 2003 | B2 |
6572489 | Miyamoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575845 | Galloway et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582323 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592468 | Vincent et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602149 | Jacobson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605007 | Bissonnette et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607452 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612938 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6616547 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638183 | Takeda | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641487 | Hamburger | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6641490 | Ellemor | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648772 | Vincent et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648773 | Evans | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652387 | Liberatore | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669571 | Cameron et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669578 | Evans | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669580 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676536 | Jacobson | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679786 | McCabe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6716111 | Liberatore | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6716114 | Nishio | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719510 | Cobzaru | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719641 | Dabbs et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739982 | Murphy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6739983 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743118 | Soracco | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749523 | Forzano | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757572 | Forest | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758763 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766726 | Schwarzkopf | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6773360 | Willett et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6773361 | Lee | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6800038 | Willett et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6805643 | Lin | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808460 | Namiki | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824475 | Burnett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6860818 | Mahaffey et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860823 | Lee | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6860824 | Evans | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875124 | Gilbert et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6875129 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881158 | Yang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881159 | Galloway et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890267 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6904663 | Willett et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6923734 | Meyer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926619 | Helmstetter et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6960142 | Bissonnette et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964617 | Williams | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974393 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988960 | Mahaffey et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991558 | Beach et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
D515165 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
6997820 | Willett et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004852 | Billings | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025692 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029403 | Rice et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7077762 | Kouno et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7137906 | Tsunoda et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140974 | Chao et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147573 | DiMarco | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153220 | Lo | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7163468 | Gibbs et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166038 | Williams et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166040 | Hoffman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166041 | Evans | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169060 | Stevens et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7179034 | Ladouceur | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186190 | Beach et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7189169 | Billings | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198575 | Beach et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201669 | Stites et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223180 | Willett et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7252600 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255654 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267620 | Chao et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278927 | Gibbs et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294065 | Liang et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7377860 | Breier et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7407447 | Beach et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419441 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7448963 | Beach et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7520820 | Dimarco | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530904 | Beach et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7540811 | Beach et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568985 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578753 | Beach et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591737 | Gibbs et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591738 | Beach et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7621823 | Beach et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628707 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632194 | Beach et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632196 | Reed et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674189 | Beach et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7744484 | Chao | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7753806 | Beach et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771291 | Willett et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7887434 | Beach et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20010049310 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020022535 | Takeda | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032075 | Vatsvog | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020072434 | Yabu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123394 | Tsurumaki | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137576 | Dammen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160854 | Beach et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030032500 | Nakahara et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030130059 | Billings | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040087388 | Beach et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040157678 | Kohno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040235584 | Chao et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242343 | Chao | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050101404 | Long et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137024 | Stites et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050181884 | Beach et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050239575 | Chao et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239576 | Stites et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060035722 | Beach et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058112 | Haralason et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060122004 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154747 | Beach | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172821 | Evans | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060240908 | Adams et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070105646 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105647 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105648 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105649 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105650 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105651 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105652 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105653 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105654 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105655 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117652 | Beach et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080146370 | Beach et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161127 | Yamamoto | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080261717 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080280698 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090088269 | Beach et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088271 | Beach et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090137338 | Kajita | May 2009 | A1 |
20090170632 | Beach et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100048316 | Honea et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048321 | Beach et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9012884 | Sep 1990 | DE |
0470488 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0617987 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1001175 | May 2000 | EP |
194823 | Dec 1921 | GB |
05-317465 | Dec 1993 | JP |
06-126004 | May 1994 | JP |
06-238022 | Aug 1994 | JP |
6-304271 | Nov 1994 | JP |
09-028844 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09-308717 | Dec 1997 | JP |
09-327534 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-234902 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-277187 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2004222911 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004267438 | Sep 2004 | JP |
05-296582 | Oct 2005 | JP |
05-323978 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006-320493 | Nov 2006 | JP |
WO8802642 | Apr 1988 | WO |
WO0166199 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO02062501 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO03061773 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO2004043549 | May 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110183775 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61009743 | Dec 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12781727 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13010579 | US | |
Parent | 12011211 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12781727 | US |