Patent Grant
9962581
The invention relates to a golf club, golf clubs, a set of golf clubs and a training golf club.
In the game of golf the player is said to “address” the ball at set up and the set up is known as the address position. To play the ball, the player swings the club behind their upper back and uses a combination of a back swing and a down swing to bring the club head into contact (or “impact”) with the ball.
For a given shot, a target line is defined between the golf ball and the target, for example the hole. There are two orthogonal angles of the shaft of a golf club that must be optimised in order to obtain the optimal shaft orientation: (i) the lean angle of the shaft relative to the vertical axis in a direction perpendicular to the target; and (ii) the lean angle of the shaft relative to the vertical axis in a direction parallel to the target line.
The first of the above-described angles is predominantly associated with the trajectory of the golf ball in the horizontal plane. The optimal angle is defined largely by the lie angle of the club. It will be appreciated that the term “lie angle” will be familiar to those skilled in the art. If lean angle of the shaft is too steep for the lie angle of the club i.e. too close to vertical then the toe of the club face may drag on the ground. This causes the club head to pivot and hence causes the plane of the face to tilt towards the right, thereby driving the ball in this direction. Conversely, if the lean angle of the shaft is too shallow for the lie angle of the club, the heel of the golf club may drag along the ground and cause the plane of the face to tilt towards the left.
The second of the above-described angles is predominantly associated with the launch angle of the golf ball, namely the angle of ascent of the golf ball immediately after impact. If the lean angle of the shaft is too steep i.e. too close to vertical then the ball will be directed upwardly and hence the distance of travel of the ball may suffer. Conversely, if the lean angle of the shaft is too shallow then the ball will travel close to the ground and may, for example, not achieve any flight at all. The optimal angle is defined largely by the loft angle and/or sole angle of the club. It will be appreciated that the terms “loft angle” and “sole angle” will be familiar to those skilled in the art.
It has been found that the centre of the club head arc in the golf swing is the player's lead shoulder not, as conventionally thought, be the centreline of the player's body. The main lever in the golf swing consists of the player's lead arm and the club shaft. Therefore the biomechanically optimised position to strike the golf ball is a position in which the main lever of the golf swing is aligned with the centre of the club head arc. This aligns the shaft with the lead shoulder; position in which the butt end of the club is approximately 15 cm towards the target.
It is often difficult for players to identify when this optimal impact position is achieved. A major reason for this difficulty is that the golf club is moving at high speed during impact and hence is only in the optimal position for a fraction of a second.
It has been found that the best golfers replicate or virtually replicate the orientation of the club at address at impact. In a conventional set up position, the shaft of the golf club is not aligned with the centre of the club head arc but the centreline of the player's body. This means the player has to perform additional complex movements during the backswing and downswing in order to lean the club shaft towards the centre of the club head arc and hence achieve an optimal impact position. This complicates the swing and forces the player to undertake these movements whilst the body is in motion. A complex swing such as this is difficult to achieve consistently.
I have realised that an effective way for a player to learn the correct impact position is to focus on the address position: assisting a player to identify the optimal position of the club at address will also assist the player in optimally positioning the club at impact.
In accordance with the present invention, as seen from a first aspect there is provided a golf club comprising:
As used herein, a plane defined by first and second vectors is a plane in which both the first and second vectors lie. In other words, the normal to the plane is found by taking the vector cross product of the first and second vectors.
It will be appreciated that the present invention utilises the principle of triangulation to assist a golfer in optimising the position of the golf club.
The above-described golf club is configured to assist a player in optimising the first of the above-described angles, namely the angle of the shaft relative to said plane. It will be appreciated that this optimal angle is predominantly dictated by the lie angle of the club and will hence the orientation of the longitudinal marker relative to the shaft may vary substantially from club to club.
In addressing the ball, the player's line of sight is in a direction that lies in said plane. The above-described orientation of the marker is such that the player is able to recognise when the longitudinal axis of the marker also extends along said plane due to the apparent foreshortening of the marker in this position. In recognising that the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker extends in said plane, the player identifies the optimal lean angle of the shaft of the club relative to said plane. The pre-setting of the hands at address into a position that closely resembles an optimal impact position removes complex movements that are required when a player starts from a conventional set up position and tries to obtain an optimal impact position. This new set-up position also builds muscle memory of the position the player is trying to re-obtain at impact.
Preferably the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker is orientated such that, when a tangent to the mid-point of the sole intermediate the toe and heel lies substantially parallel to the plane of the ground, the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker extends in the plane defined by the first and second vectors.
The shaft of the golf club may be at an angle that is between 0 and 30 degrees to said plane when the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker lies in said plane. Preferably the shaft of the golf club is at an angle that is between 0 and 22 degrees to said plane when the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker lies in said plane.
Preferably the golf club is further configured to assist a player in optimising the second of the above-described angles at address, namely the angle of the shaft within said plane relative to the vertical direction. It has been found that the conventional set up position, in which the player's stance is symmetrical and the player sets the head of the golf club behind the ball ready to play, is not the same as the optimum impact position when impacting with and hitting the ball during play. The optimal position is in fact one in which the hands are ahead of the centre-line of the body, towards the direction of the target. This position is known as the “hands ahead” or “delayed strike” position. A position in which the distal end of the shaft at the grip end (also known as the butt end of the golf club) is approximately 15 cm from the centreline of the player's body, in the direction of the target, is generally considered optimal. It will be appreciated that this address position is different to the conventional address position, in which the butt end of the golf club is approximately aligned with the centreline of the player's body.
Preferably the golf club is configured to bias a player to a position in which the player's hands are displaced by approximately 10 to 15 cm from the centreline of the player's body, in the direction of the target.
The elongate marker is preferably orientated such that, when the sole of the golf club lies substantially parallel to the plane of the ground, the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker is substantially parallel to the player's line of sight. It will be appreciated that the marker will appear maximally foreshortened when in this orientation. The above-described orientation of the marker is therefore such that the player is able to recognise when the golf club is optimally positioned due to the apparent foreshortening of the marker in this position.
The optimal position of the centre-line of the player's body relative to the ball at address may vary according to the type of club. For example, the ball may be positioned equidistant between the lead foot and the centre-line of the player's body when the player is using a long to mid iron. The ball may be approximately aligned with the mid or the centre-line of the player's body, away from the target, when using a short iron. Conversely, the ball may be positioned adjacent the player's lead foot when using a driver, such that the golf club makes contact with the ball during the upswing. It will be appreciated that variations in the position of the ball relative to the centre-line of the body generates variations in the line of sight of the player at address and impact. It is therefore difficult to precisely define the direction of the player's line of sight. It will, however, be appreciated that the line of sight at address and impact is a line from a first location to a second location on the leading edge of the head of the golf club, the first location being between approximately 150 cm and 210 cm upwardly and up to approximately 15 cm leftwardly or rightwardly of the second location.
Preferably the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker is arranged to extend in a direction substantially parallel to the first vector when the second angle of the shaft is between approximately 3 degrees and approximately 30 degrees. More preferably, the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker is arranged to extend in a direction substantially parallel to the first vector when the second angle of the shaft of the golf club is between approximately 5 degrees and approximately 22 degrees.
The club head may be coupled to the second longitudinal end of the elongate shaft by a shaft connection member, which may comprise a hosel. Preferably the elongate marker is located at least partially on the shaft connection member. More preferably, the marker is located wholly on the shaft connection member. The elongate marker may be located on a leading side of the shaft connection member so that the marker is easily visible when the golf club is inclined to the vertical within said plane. A hosel or hosel extension is convenient for marking without damaging the club head and is within a player's eye line during set up or address.
The ball striking face may comprise a leading edge and a trailing edge, defined in terms of the direction of swing of the golf club. Preferably the longitudinal axis of the elongate marker is directed towards the leading edge of the ball striking face, more preferably directed towards a leading groove on the ball striking face, namely the groove closest to the target
The ball striking face may be inclined at an angle relative to the sole of the golf club. The ball striking face is positioned with respect to the shaft at an angle in the range of 0 degrees to 65 degrees.
In an embodiment the striking face is planar. An iron has a flat or planar striking face. In another embodiment the striking face is convex. Woods and rescue type clubs have a convex striking face. The ball striking face may comprise a series of grooves or ridges.
The elongate marker may comprise a line.
The elongate marker preferably comprises a mark from the range of; painted, forged, milled, cast, scored, dyed and molded.
Preferably the golf head comprises a sole angle of at least 0 to 30 degrees, when the measurement is taken whilst the shaft centreline is in said plane. Advantageously, the player is directed towards the optimal address position due to a combination of the angle of the shaft and the enhanced sole angle of the club. The angle of the head has the effect of pushing the ball through to the target, whilst the elongate marker gives feedback and instruction to the player.
Preferably the sole of the golf club comprises a substantially planar portion. Advantageously, this assists the natural orientation of the club to a position in which the substantially planar portion lies flat on the ground.
The golf club may be a training club comprising a curved shaft. The shaft is preferably concave if viewed from above when in use. Preferably the shaft is configured to curve outwardly away from the direction of the target when in use. This can assist a player to become accustomed to the lateral body movement required to achieve an optimum impact position and hands ahead position and can be used as a coaching tool illustrating the forwards effective impact position required.
The curvature on the shaft imitates the shape of a conventional shaft when it is under full compression with the ball and ground. In this embodiment, due to the curved nature of the shaft, the club head is approximately 15 cm behind the straight line axis of the shaft at the butt end of the club. The combination of the curved shaft and the elongate marker encourages the player to lead his hands into a position in front of the line of tension before the clubface makes contact with the ball. As used herein, “line of tension” is defined as a reference line between the lead shoulder and the ball, the line of tension being perpendicular to the line of compression, which is well known in the art. The line of tension is important for maintaining contact with the ball to urge the ball forwards towards the target, rather than to swing the club in a pendulum swing path. Additionally and importantly, the hands have to hold the clubface square to the target line whilst the hands are in this forward leaning position until the ball has been struck. The curved shaft encourages the player to maintain the relationship between the lead arm and shaft for 15 cm in order to get the club head to make contact with the ball, whilst the hands are still holding the club face square to the target line. This movement prevents the player from rolling his hands over and releasing the club head too early. The club therefore forces the player to swing the club head down the target line for an elongated period of time during the impact area. Since the club head and face stay square to the target for a fraction longer, a greater degree of accuracy is achieved. This movement is called “Sustaining the line of Compression” or a “Delayed Strike or Lag Impact”. A training club comprising a curved shaft therefore forces the player to feel the sensation of a delayed strike and all of the benefits that go with sustaining the line of compression.
In accordance with the present invention, as seen from a second aspect, there is provided a method for modifying a golf club to assist in training, the method comprising:
Step (b) may comprise aligning a tangent to a mid-point of the sole with said first plane. Alternatively or additionally, step (b) may comprise aligning a substantially planar portion of the sole of the golf club with said first plane.
Step (c) may comprise marking a shaft connection member configured to couple the second longitudinal end portion of the shaft with the club head.
It will be appreciated that a golf club in accordance with the present invention assists a player in obtaining the optimal lean angle of the shaft during address in a direction perpendicular to the target line, thereby assisting a player to avoid hooking or slicing the ball during the impact phase.
In a preferred embodiment, the marker may also be configured to assist the player in identifying the optical lean angle of the shaft in a direction parallel to the target line. In this embodiment, the method preferably further comprises identifying a line of sight of a player stood on said first plane and holding the club such that the sole is aligned with the first face. The method preferably further comprises positioning the player in an optimal address position. Step (c) may comprise marking the golf club with an elongate marker having a longitudinal axis substantially parallel to the player's line of sight to the head of the golf club when in said optimal address position.
The method may be implemented for an individual player, thereby providing a golf club that is specific to the body of that player. Alternatively, the method may be implemented for an “average” body, or a plurality of bodies of differing heights.
The elongate marker may be as hereinbefore described.
In accordance with the present invention, as seen from a third aspect, there is provided a method for manufacturing a golf club, the method comprising:
Step (b) may comprise aligning a tangent to a mid-point of the sole with said first plane. Alternatively or additionally, step (b) may comprise aligning a substantially planar portion of the sole of the golf club with said first plane.
Step (c) may comprise marking a shaft connection member configured to couple the second longitudinal end portion of the shaft with the club head.
In a preferred embodiment, the marker may also be configured to assist the player in identifying the optical lean angle of the shaft in a direction parallel to the target line. In this embodiment, the method preferably further comprises identifying a line of sight of a player stood on said first plane and holding the club such that the sole is aligned with the first face. The method preferably further comprises positioning the player in an optimal address position. Step (c) may comprise marking the golf club with an elongate marker having a longitudinal axis substantially parallel to the player's line of sight to the head of the golf club when in said optimal address position.
The method may be implemented for an individual player, thereby providing a golf club that is specific to the body of that player. Alternatively, the method may be implemented for an “average” body, or a plurality of bodies of differing heights.
The elongate marker may be as hereinbefore described.
Examples of a golf club in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, when in use, will now be described.
When striking a golf ball, a player moves laterally from the address position towards the target to which the player is aiming and into the impact position after completing the backswing and downswing. It can be said that the purpose of the backswing and downswing is twofold. Firstly, it achieves a forward momentum in the direction of the target by generating club head speed at impact and secondly the swing delivers the club head to the ball in a so called minutely open or square to target position at impact. The swing should also deliver the player and club to the ball with the optimum impact position: with weight predominantly on the lead foot, with hands ahead of the club head and thus creating a “Hands Ahead Angle” i.e. the angle generated between the centreline of the shaft at impact and a vertical line to the ground from the end of the butt end of the shaft. Most professionals would concur that the main purpose of the golf swing is to create a Hands Ahead Angle at impact, this is otherwise known as a Delayed Strike or lag. Most players however, are not aware of the importance of the hands ahead angle and the benefits of delayed strike. If a golfer instead tries to replicate the address position at the point of impact with the ball he will find that the hands will be behind the club face and the ball at the point of impact. This leads to their weight being on the back foot or centre of the stance, leading to a reduction in the power of the swing and bad body position. This leads to inconsistent ball striking, ball flight and ball direction.
A golf club face has a loft angle defined by a measurement in an apparatus known as a loft and lie device in which the shaft is locked into a vertical plane and where the club face is set with the leading edge of the clubface at 90 degrees to the target line. The sole of the club is arranged to sit midway between heel and toe and the loft angle is measured from the club face to the vertical. The club may have a design bounce angle measured as the angle of the lowest face of the flange or sole of the club back to the leading edge. The flange and the angle of the sole with respect the horizontal acts to avoid the leading edge of the club digging into the ground at impact.
With the Design Loft Angle known and the shaft in a vertical plane, then the Design Lean Angle or hands forward angle is the difference between, the actual angle between the club face and the vertical line, and the Design Loft Angle. This is illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
At impact, a player achieving optimum or close to optimum impact position will have necessarily shifted their weight and hands forward, in front of the ball at the address position. The shift and the hands forward angle that this creates will have the effect of reducing the loft angle of the club head design and reducing any bounce angle of the sole with respect to the sole horizontal at impact. This can mean impaired performance from the club and in some cases means that the leading edge of the club head and the planar striking face will come into contact with the ground before the flange or sole and dig in, resulting in a less effective shot.
An increase in the shaft angle creates a hands ahead angle for improved performance at impact and the increased bounce angle also assists in ensuring that the leading edge of the clubhead does not dig into the ground. This is suitable, for example, for an iron type club with a straight shaft known as a conforming club (a club conforming to the R&A rules of golf club construction).
Advantages of the golf club of the present invention include; that it forces the hands into the impact position during set up, therefore eliminating difficult hand/wrist/arm and body manoeuvres in the backswing and downswing to achieve the desired position at impact. The invention makes it very easy to have a one piece take away because the shaft and lead arm are in alignment with the centre of the club head arc (i.e. with the lead shoulder) and this is pre-set in the address position. The golf club simplifies the entire swing by eliminating the need to create a lag angle in the backswing and downswing. This also acts to engender a feeling that the player must utilise a lateral move with the hips towards the target to start the downswing. In addition the club ensures the player holds the hands off (ahead) the entire way through the impact zone. So casting and flipping/rolling the hands is not an option, if the player is to hit a straight shot. The club also promotes a good weight shift due to the lateral hip move in the direction of the target, this ensures the players hands are in the correct position at impact, promotes a full extension after impact and enables the player to swing to a balanced finish due to weight being firmly on the lead foot during the impact zone. Finally the golf club promotes a positive strike through the impact zone because the hands are ahead of the club head. This is especially pertinent in the short game (chipping, pitching and putting). This promotes a feeling of “swinging through the impact zone” not hitting at the ball.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described in detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In all of
The golf club of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In
It has been found that the optimum impact position for an iron type club is with a lean angle, or hands forward angle of around 7 to 10 degrees. This has been found to be when the butt end of the shaft is around 10 to 15 cm forward of the club face 14.
The address marker 20 is important due to inconsistencies with the ground surface of play and unfamiliarity of the player with the hands forward position, as described below. The exact forward hand position (lean angle) is determined by the sole of the club when the club head sits on the ground. The club head invariably sits close to square to the ground, however, certain golf clubs incorporate a “bounce angle” on the sole of the club to prevent the leading edge digging into the ground (if the player presents the clubface at too steep an angle in the impact zone). The lean angle is easy to locate under laboratory type conditions when the club is locked into loft and lie machine. However, because golf clubs are designed to be used on grass, where the club head doesn't necessarily orientate to a position where the club head sits in the intended manner/position, (and because the clubs differ from conventional clubs where the player aligns the shaft directly under the eye line to achieve the correct conventional address position) It is necessary to incorporate a hand position alignment marking on the club head hosel to enable the player to identify and pre-set the hands in the exact hand position required. This hand position alignment line will be at very specific angles for differing clubs (metal woods, rescue type clubs, iron type clubs and putters). The angle/s of the hand position alignment marking change minutely between iron type clubs where the ball position is relatively constant and only varies due to the length of the club. Whereas the rescue type clubs and metal wood type clubs have a different angle of marking due to the ball position being further forward in the stance and those clubs being longer than iron type clubs.
The hand position alignment marking (address marker 20) enables the player to identify and locate the correct forward hand position for all of the differing clubs in relation to the conventional (and unchanged) optimum ball position for the selected club. This alignment address marker 20 will be painted, forged, cast or molded into the hosel 6 of the club head 4. The hand position alignment marking may be known as HPAM. The address marking should be located on the hosel or connecting member of the club head. This should be positioned on the connecting member in a fashion that an extension of the marking would extend and point to the leading edge of the clubface starting at the lowest point on the hosel or connection member directly above the leading edge of the clubface and heading up the connecting member in line with the player's eye line.
In a preferred embodiment the address marker is located between 5 and 20 degrees from the centreline of the hosel 6 at the bottom of the club to just above the leading edge of the clubface to the player's nose when viewed on a vertical plane. The address marker alignment line markings on the metal woods, rescue and the iron type clubs will be marked on the hosel of the club head. Due to the hosel of club heads being tubular the markings will be curved around the hosel but when viewed from the player's eye line the marking will be foreshortened and viewed as a straight line when the hands are in the correct hands forward position.
The angle of the address alignment marker (also known as HPAM) is to be measured backwards from the centreline of the shaft. The centre line of the shaft is chosen because the player's eye line is not always on a vertical plane above the ball position. The marking angle (the angle) is made up of two angles added together these angles are; the lean angle measured in degrees back from the centreline of the shaft to the vertical plane and then the vertical plane backwards to the players eye line when the player is using various different clubs.
In a preferred embodiment of a putter illustrated in
An alternative embodiment provides a training club comprising a curved shaft.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1301254.7 | Jan 2013 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/GB2014/050180 | 1/23/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014/114940 | 7/31/2014 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1603850 | Keating | Oct 1926 | A |
| 2865635 | Jessen | Dec 1958 | A |
| 3079157 | Turner | Feb 1963 | A |
| 4140318 | Izett et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4157830 | Taylor et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4222567 | Shabala | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4240636 | Swenson | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4753440 | Chorne | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4809981 | Doran et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4852879 | Collins | Aug 1989 | A |
| 5158297 | Johnson | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5209474 | Voyer | May 1993 | A |
| 5234217 | Johnson | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5308068 | Strand | May 1994 | A |
| 5348295 | Phillips | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5494282 | Pranio | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5709612 | Salado | Jan 1998 | A |
| 6780118 | McCartney | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 7976399 | Pritchett | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 20010009872 | Patsky | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20020160849 | Thomas | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20050075185 | Green | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20100041491 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 204 500 | Nov 1988 | GB |
| 52146354 | Apr 1951 | JP |
| 3006951 | Nov 1994 | JP |
| H10192452 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| H1133148 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| H11-114104 | Apr 1999 | JP |
| 2003-135628 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2007-75278 | Mar 2007 | JP |
| WO 9409865 | May 1994 | WO |
| WO 0064543 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0174456 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 2006136048 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007106095 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2009035345 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150360090 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
