Patent Grant
6997818
The present invention relates to a golf clubhead and a manufacturing method therefor, and more particularly to an internal structure of the hosel portion of the golf club head which is capable of providing greater flexibility in the designing of the golf clubhead.
In recent years, there is a tendency for the wood-type golf clubs to increase the size or volume of the clubhead. Although the volume of the clubhead is increased, the weight of the clubhead should not be increased. In designing such a wood-type golf clubhead, a target weight and target volume of the clubhead are usually first given, and the position of the center of gravity of the clubhead, which greatly affects the position of the sweet spot, moment of inertia, performance, feel and the like, must be determined relative to the club shaft. In a conventional wood-type metal head whose volume is not so large, an extension of the hosel which is usually provided in the clubhead is formed as a protuberance extending along the inside of the clubhead as shown in
It is therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a golf clubhead and a method of manufacturing the same, which can provide greater flexibility in designing the golf clubhead, and thus provide a clubhead of high-performance.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a golf clubhead comprises a main body and a face member, the main body comprising a main shell portion having a hollow and a tubular inner extension of a hosel protruding in the hollow, and at least a part of the tubular inner extension separating from the inner surface of the main shell portion. A method of making the golf clubhead comprises making a first lost form corresponding to the main shell portion, making a second lost form corresponding to the tubular inner extension, fixing the second lost form to the first lost form to make a third lost form corresponding to the main body, making a casting mold using the third lost form, and casting a metallic material into the main body using the casting mold.
Therefore, weight can be saved in the hosel part. As a result, greater flexibility in designing the clubhead can be obtained. For example, it becomes possible to shift the position of the center of gravity towards the toe. Further, the saved weight can be utilized for: lowering the position of the center of gravity; increasing the volume of the clubhead; increasing the moment of inertia of the clubhead; increasing the strength or durability by distributing to a weak part; and the like.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings, which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
a,
10
b and 10c are schematic cross sectional views for explaining a process of making the lost form.
a and 13b are schematic cross sectional views of a golf clubhead used in the undermentioned comparison tests taken along a vertical plane and a horizontal plane, respectively.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, golf clubhead 1 according to the present invention is a wood type metal head.
The clubhead 1 comprises: a face portion 2 whose outer surface defines a clubface F for striking a golf ball; a crown portion 3 defining an upper face of the clubhead meeting an upper edge of the clubface (F); a sole portion 4 defining the bottom face of the clubhead or sole meeting a lower edge of the clubface (F); a side portion 5 between the crown portion 3 and sole portion 4, which extends from a toe-side edge (t) of the clubface (F) to a heel-side edge (h) of the clubface (F) through a back (B) of the clubhead; and a protruding hosel portion 6 formed near a heel-side position at which the face portion 2, crown portion 3 and side portion 4 meet.
The clubhead 1 has a two-piece structure comprising two pieces or parts welded together.
In this example, as shown in
The face member 1a in this example comprises a flat main part forming the face portion 2 and a rim 6 extending backward from the edge of the face portion 2. The rim 6 in this example is provided along the entire length of the edge of the face portion 2 so as to form a crown-side rim portion 6a forming a part of the crown portion 3, a sole-side rim portion 6b forming a part of the sole portion 4, a toe-side rim portion 6c forming a toe-side part of the side portion 5, and a heel-side rim portion 6d forming a heel-side part of the side portion 5. However, it may be possible to form the rim 6 including at least one of the above-mentioned rim portions 6a, 6b, 6c and 6d.
Because the rim 6 provides a distance between the welded part (j) of the face member 1a and the main body 1b from the edge of the clubface F, the impulsive force transmitted to the welded part (j) at the time of striking a golf ball is dispersed and mitigated. As a result, the durability of the clubhead can be improved. Further, the working property and accuracy may be improved in comparison with the case where the welded part is formed at the edge of the clubface F.
If the width of the rim 6 or the measurement in the back and forth direction is less than 5 mm, it is difficult to obtain such advantageous effects. If the width of the rim 6 is more than 35 mm, it becomes difficult to make the face member 1a through plastic forming such as press forming and the like. Therefore, the width is preferably set in a range of from 5 to 35 mm.
For the face member 1a, various metallic materials such as aluminum alloy, titanium alloy, stainless and the like may be used. But, in order to make the face member 1a through plastic forming, materials suitable therefor are used.
A beta-type titanium alloy is preferably used because it becomes possible to employ cold forging and cold press forming, and thereby it becomes possible to improve the strength without increasing the production cost.
As the beta-type titanium alloy, for example, Ti-15V-3Cr-3Al-3Sn, Ti-22V-4Al, Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al, Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al, Ti-13V-11Cr-3Al, Ti-8Mo-8V-2Fe-3Al, Ti-3Al-8V-6Cu-4Mo-4Zr, Ti-11.5Mo-6Zr-4.5Sn, Ti-15Mo-5Zr and the like can be used.
On the other hand, the main body 1b is formed into a single piece by casting.
For the main body 1b, metallic materials suitable for casting such as aluminum alloy, titanium alloy, stainless and the like are used. In this example, a titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V is used.
The main body 1b comprises a main shell portion 11 having a hollow (i) therein having an opening (O) on the front thereof, and a tubular portion 12 for forming an inner extension of the hosel portion 6.
The main shell portion 11 comprises a crown wall 7, a sole wall 9, and a side wall 10 between the crown wall 7 and sole wall 9, extending from the heel-side to the toe-side. The crown wall 7 is welded to the crown-side rim portion 6a and they form the crown portion 3. The sole wall 9 is welded to the sole-side rim portion 6b and they form the sole portion 4. The side wall 10 is welded to the toe-side rim portion 6c and heel-side rim portion 6d and they form the side portion 5.
By welding the rim 6 to the edge of the opening O as above, the face member 1a is fixed to the main body 1b and the opening O is closed and the closed hollow (i) is formed.
The tubular portion 12 protrudes into the hollow (i) from the inner surface of the main shell portion 11 in the hosel portion 6, while forming a part separating from the inner surface 11a of the main shell portion 11 and having a certain length L1. The tubular portion 12 in this example is a circular cylinder having a substantially constant outside diameter and a substantially constant wall thickness. Specifically, the tubular portion 12 is united with the inside of the hosel portion 6, and a gap 14 is formed between the separating part and the inner surface 11a.
In
In
The bridge 13 has a thickness w less than the outside diameter of the tubular portion 12 which is usually set in a range of from 1 to 5 mm, preferably 1.5 to 4.0 mm, more preferably 2.5 to 3.0 mm. The total length L2 of the bridge 13 may be set in a range of from 5 to 30 mm, however, from a point of view of weight saving and durability improvement, it is preferably set in a range of from 7 to 20 mm, more preferably 10 to 15 mm in the axial direction of the shaft.
On the other hand, the length L1 of the separating part may be set in a range of from 5 to 40 mm, however, from a point of view of weight saving, it is preferably set in a range of from 20 to 38 mm, more preferably 30 to 35 mm in the axial direction of the club shaft.
In
In
The main body 1b, namely, the main shell portion 11, tubular portion 12 and the bridge 13 (if any) are integrally molded. In this embodiment, the main body 1b is formed by lost-wax precision casting using a ceramic casting mold.
In order to make the main body 1b by lost-wax casting, firstly a lost form M or duplication of the main body 1b is made. Secondly, using this lost form M, a casting mold is made. Then, using the casting mold, the main body 1b is made.
Here, the lost form is usually regarded as wax model formed by injecting wax into a mold.
The main-shell-portion form 15 comprises a crown wall M1a, a sole wall M1b, a side wall M1c between the crown wall M1a and sole wall M1b, extending from the heel-side to the toe-side, and a hosel portion M1d having a hole H.
As shown in
As shown in
Further, as shown in
Next, using the lost form M, a casting mold Y is made. As shown in
Then, molten metal is poured into the casting mold Y, using a sprue (not shown). After the metal is hardened, the casting mold is broken up by using shot blast, or hitting with a hammer to take out the main body 1b,
Comparison Tests
Wood type golf clubheads were made by way of test. The clubheads had a two-piece structure as shown in
In Ex.1 and Ex.2, in order to make the lost form of the main body, the main-shell-portion form and the tubular-portion form made separately by injection molding were assembled and fixed by fusion bonding using a soldering iron.
In Ref.1 and Ref.2, the lost form of the main body was integrally molded as shown in
Using the lost form, a ceramic casting mold was made, and using the ceramic casting mold the main body was made.
As the targeted values, the clubhead weight was 185 grams. The clubhead volume was 360 cc. The distance of the center of gravity of the clubhead from the axis of the shaft was 35 mm when viewed from the front of the clubface. The depth of the center of gravity of the clubhead from the leading edge was 35 mm when viewed from above the crown portion. The height of the sweet spot was 28 mm—the sweet spot is defined as a point of intersection of the clubface and a normal thereto drawn from the center of gravity of the clubhead.
In adjusting the above parameters to the targeted values, the highest priority was given to the position of the center of gravity in case of Ref.1. In case of Ref.2, the highest priority was given to the head volume.
Flexibility in designing: As the differences of the measurements from the respective targeted values are smaller, the structure can be regarded as being greater in the flexibility in designing.
Durability: The clubhead was attached to a shaft to make a golf club, and the golf club was mounted on a swing robot. The clubhead struck golf balls 3000 times at the head speed of 50 meter/second, and thereafter the clubface was checked for deformation and/or damage.
Variations of clubhead angles: With respect to each of the loft angle, lie angle and hook angle, the mean value for ten samples and their variation were obtained.
The test results are shown in Table 1.
As to Ex.1, the clubhead whose measurements were just the targeted values could be manufactured as the separating part was relatively long. With respect to the durability, a satisfactory result could be obtained.
As to Ex.2, although the depth and distance of the center of gravity became smaller than the targeted values as the separating part was shorter than Ex.1, the clubhead could be developed to a practical level. As a result of the highest priority given to the head volume, the thickness of the face portion was decreased and the dent was slightly increased when compared with Ex.1, but it was still a practical level.
In Ex.1 and Ex.2, it was confirmed that the variations of the measurements could be well controlled.
As to Ref.1, as a considerable weight was distributed to between the tubular portion 12 and main shell portion 11 and the overall clubhead weight was a given value and further the highest priority was given to the position of the center of gravity, the head volume was obliged to decrease. Thus, the head volume is sacrificed in this case. Under ordinary circumstances, when the weight increases on the heel-side and the clubhead size becomes small, the distance of the center of gravity becomes shorter. In this case, in order to avoid this, by increasing the thickness of each portion on the toe-side, the position of the center of gravity was adjusted.
As to Ref.2, as a considerable weight was distributed to between the tubular portion 12 and main shell portion 11 and the overall clubhead weight was a given value and further the highest priority was given to the head volume, the depth and distance of the center of gravity were obliged to decrease, and further, the thickness of each portion was decreased and the durability test results became worse. Thus, the position of the center of gravity and durability are sacrificed in this case.
In Ref.1 and Ref.2, the variations of the measurements became increased.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-261989 | Aug 2001 | JP | national |
This application is a Divisional of application Ser. No. 10/222,920, filed on Aug. 19, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,304, and for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 120; and this application claims priority of Application No. 2001-261989 filed in Japan on Aug. 30, 2001 under 35 U.S.C. § 119; the entire contents of all are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4326326 | MacDonald | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4417731 | Yamada | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4438931 | Motomiya | Mar 1984 | A |
| 5416968 | Okumoto et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5439218 | Gondeck | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5575723 | Take et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5651409 | Sheehan | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5709614 | Horiba | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5755627 | Yamazaki et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5769735 | Hosokawa | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5855526 | Honma | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5888148 | Allen | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888149 | Allen | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5931742 | Nishimura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5938541 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5961394 | Minabe | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6033318 | Drajan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6287214 | Satoh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6406654 | Perez et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6450896 | Chen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6478691 | Okoshi | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6514153 | Miyamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 61-51863 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| 2-88677 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040266552 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10222920 | Aug 2002 | US |
| Child | 10899174 | US |
