Aspects of this disclosure generally relate to golf clubs and golf club heads. More particularly, aspects of this disclosure relate to golf clubs and golf club heads having a plurality of sensors for detecting one or more swing parameters.
Golf is enjoyed by a wide variety of players—players of different genders and dramatically different ages and/or skill levels. Golf is somewhat unique in the sporting world in that such diverse collections of players can play together in golf events, even in direct competition with one another (e.g., using handicapped scoring, different tee boxes, in team formats, etc.), and still enjoy the golf outing or competition. These factors, together with the increased availability of golf programming on television (e.g., golf tournaments, golf news, golf history, and/or other golf programming) and the rise of well-known golf superstars, at least in part, have increased golf's popularity in recent years, both in the United States and across the world.
Golfers at all skill levels seek to improve their performance, lower their golf scores, and reach that next performance “level.” Manufacturers of all types of golf equipment have responded to these demands, and in recent years, the industry has witnessed dramatic changes and improvements in golf equipment. For example, a wide range of different golf ball and club models now are available, with balls designed to complement specific swing speeds and/or other player characteristics or preferences, e.g., with some balls designed to fly farther and/or straighter; some designed to provide higher or flatter trajectories; some designed to provide more spin, control, and/or feel (particularly around the greens); some designed for faster or slower swing speeds; etc. Additionally, the market has seen dramatic changes and improvements in putter designs, golf club head designs, shafts, and grips in recent years. Further, other technological advancements have been made in an effort to better match the various elements and/or characteristics of the golf club and characteristics of a golf ball to a particular user's swing features or characteristics
In addition to the golf equipment, the mechanics of the golf swing itself are also of interest to the player eager to improve his/her performance. Qualitative evaluation of a user's swing by a trained golfing professional has traditionally been helpful in correcting certain errors and honing skills of players of all experience levels.
As technology has evolved, the capability to mount sensors onto a golf club or other swinging device has become available. However, the speed at which a golfer may swing a golf club can generate motions that may not be measured accurately because the forces created by the swing may exceed the sensor's measurement capability. Thus, a means to increase the measurement capability and increase accuracy of the measurements would be welcome in the art.
In light of the foregoing background, the following presents a simplified summary of the present disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the various implementations of this disclosure. This summary is not an extensive overview of the embodiments described herein. It is not intended to identify key or critical elements, or to delineate the scope of the embodiments described in this disclosure. The following summary merely presents some concepts of the embodiments of this disclosure in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description provided below.
In one aspect, this disclosure may relate to a golf club comprising: a shaft having a first end connected to a golf club head and a second end connected to a grip; a sensor connected to the golf club, where the sensor comprises a first inertial measurement unit and a second inertial measurement unit. The first inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in a first axis, a second axis, and a third axis and angular rates of rotation about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis, where the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis are orthogonally oriented. The second inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in a fourth axis, a fifth axis, and a sixth axis and angular rates of rotation about the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis, where the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis are orthogonally oriented. The first axis and the second axis of the first inertial measurement unit are oriented at an angle to the fourth axis and the fifth axis of the second inertial measurement unit. The first axis and the second axis of the first inertial measurement unit may be oriented at an angle of 45 degrees from the sixth axis of the second inertial measurement unit.
In another aspect, this disclosure may include at least one axis of the first inertial measurement unit oriented in the same direction as at least one axis of the second inertial measurement unit. Also, the sensor may be positioned near the grip end of the golf club or may be connected to the golf club head. Additionally, a plurality of sensors, each having at least one inertial measurement unit, may be positioned on the golf club. The sensor may be releasably connected to the golf club.
Another aspect may also relate to the sensor having the first inertial measurement unit mounted to a first circuit card assembly and the second inertial measurement unit mounted to a second circuit card assembly. The first circuit card assembly is perpendicularly oriented to the second circuit card assembly. In addition, the first circuit card assembly may comprise a processor and a power source. Lastly, a housing may be provided, which has a first mounting surface, and a second mounting surface oriented perpendicular to the first mounting surface, where the first circuit card assembly may be connected to the first mounting surface and the second circuit card assembly may be connected to the second mounting surface.
In yet another aspect, this disclosure relates to a golf club comprising: a shaft and a golf club head, the shaft having a first end connected to the golf club head and a second end connected to a grip; a sensor connected to a golf club, where the sensor comprises a first inertial measurement unit, a second inertial measurement unit, and a processor; and a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to at least: receive angular rate of rotation measurements about a first axis, a second axis, and a third axis from the first inertial measurement unit; where the first inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis and angular rates of rotation about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis, where the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis are orthogonally oriented; compare the angular rate of rotation measurements from the first inertial measurement unit to a predetermined set of parameters; receive angular rate of rotation measurements about a fourth axis, a fifth axis, and a sixth axis from the second inertial measurement unit; where the second inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis and angular rates of rotation about the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis, wherein the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis are orthogonally oriented; calculate angular rate of rotation measurements about a first virtual axis, a second virtual axis, and a third virtual axis, wherein the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis may be the same orientation as the first axis, the second axis and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit; and output the angular rate of rotation measurements of the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis. The first axis and the second axis of the first inertial measurement unit may be oriented at an angle of 45 degrees from the sixth axis of the second inertial measurement unit. Also, at least one axis of the first inertial measurement unit may be oriented in the same direction as at least one axis of the second inertial measurement unit. The predetermined set of parameters may include a saturation limit for the angular rate of rotation measurement.
Yet another aspect of this disclosure may relate to a golf club comprising: a shaft and a golf club head, the shaft having a first end connected to the golf club head and a second end connected to a grip; a sensor connected to the golf club, where the sensor comprises a first inertial measurement unit, a second inertial measurement unit, and a processor; and a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that when executed by the processor, causes the processor to at least: receive angular rate of rotation measurements about a first axis, a second axis, and a third axis from a first inertial measurement unit; where the first inertial measurement unit is capable of measuring linear accelerations in the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis and angular rates of rotation about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis, wherein the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis are orthogonally oriented; receive angular rate of rotation measurements about a fourth axis, a fifth axis, and a sixth axis from a second inertial measurement unit; wherein the second inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis and angular rates of rotation about the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis, where the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis are orthogonally oriented; calculate angular rate of rotation measurements about a first virtual axis, a second virtual axis, and a third virtual axis, where the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis may have the same orientation as the first axis, the second axis and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit; and calculate a divergence of the angular rate of rotation about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit and the angular rate of rotation about the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis; calculate a gyroscopic bias drift of the angular rate of rotation measurement about the first axis, the second axis and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit; and output the gyroscopic bias drift of the first axis, the second axis and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit.
Still another aspect of this disclosure may relate to a golf club comprising: a shaft and a golf club head, the shaft having a first end connected to the golf club head and a second end connected to a grip; a sensor connected to the golf club, where the sensor comprises a first inertial measurement unit, a second inertial measurement unit, and a processor; and a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that when executed by the processor, causes the processor to at least: receive linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about a first axis, a second axis, and a third axis from the first inertial measurement unit; where the first inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis and angular rates of rotation about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis, where the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis are orthogonally oriented; receive linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about a fourth axis, a fifth axis, and a sixth axis from the second inertial measurement unit; where the second inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis and angular rates of rotation about the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis, where the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis are orthogonally oriented; calculate linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about a first virtual axis, a second virtual axis, and a third virtual axis, where the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis may have the same orientation as the first axis, the second axis and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit; and calculate an average of the linear acceleration and the angular rate of rotation measurements about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit with the linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis; and output the average of the linear acceleration and the angular rate of rotation measurements.
In addition, another aspect of this disclosure may relate to a golf club comprising: a shaft and a golf club head, the shaft having a first end connected to the golf club head and a second end connected to a grip; a sensor connected to the golf club, where the sensor comprises a first inertial measurement unit, a second inertial measurement unit, and a processor; and a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to at least: receive linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about a first axis, a second axis, and a third axis from the first inertial measurement unit, where the first inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis and angular rates of rotation about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis; receive linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about a fourth axis, a fifth axis, and a sixth axis from the second inertial measurement unit, where the second inertial measurement unit may be capable of measuring linear accelerations in the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis and angular rates of rotation about the fourth axis, the fifth axis, and the sixth axis; calculate linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about a first virtual axis, a second virtual axis, and a third virtual axis, where the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis may be the same orientation as the first axis, the second axis and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit; and calculate a first noise value about of the linear acceleration and the angular rate of rotation measurements about the first axis, the second axis, and the third axis of the first inertial measurement unit with and calculate a second noise value about the linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation measurements about the first virtual axis, the second virtual axis, and the third virtual axis; and output an average noise of the first noise value and the second noise value about the linear acceleration and the angular rate of rotation measurements.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. The Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and is not limited in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements.
In the following description of various example structures according to the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration various example devices, systems, and environments in which aspects of the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other specific arrangements of parts, example devices, systems, and environments may be utilized and structural and functional modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. Also, while the terms “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “side,” “rear,” and the like may be used in this specification to describe various example features and elements of the invention, these terms are used herein as a matter of convenience, e.g., based on the example orientations shown in the figures or the orientation during typical use. Additionally, the term “plurality,” as used herein, indicates any number greater than one, either disjunctively or conjunctively, as necessary, up to an infinite number. Nothing in this specification should be construed as requiring a specific three dimensional orientation of structures in order to fall within the scope of this invention. Also, the reader is advised that the attached drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The following terms are used in this specification, and unless otherwise noted or clear from the context, these terms have the meanings provided below.
“Ball striking device” means any device constructed and designed to strike a ball or other similar objects (such as a hockey puck). In addition to generically encompassing “ball striking heads,” which are described in more detail below, examples of “ball striking devices” include, but are not limited to: golf clubs, putters, croquet mallets, polo mallets, baseball or softball bats, cricket bats, tennis rackets, badminton rackets, field hockey sticks, ice hockey sticks, and the like.
“Ball striking head” (or “head”) means the portion of a “ball striking device” that includes and is located immediately adjacent (optionally surrounding) the portion of the ball striking device designed to contact the ball (or other object) in use. In some examples, such as many golf clubs and putters, the ball striking head may be a separate and independent entity from any shaft member, and it may be attached to the shaft in some manner.
The terms “shaft” or “handle” include the portion of a ball striking device (if any) that the user holds during a swing of a ball striking device.
“Substantially perpendicular” means that two elements are oriented at an angle of 90 degrees or within +/−2 percent of 90 degrees.
In general, aspects of this invention relate to sensors relating to golf swing analysis systems or any type of swing analysis system such as baseball, tennis, racquetball, hockey, or any sport that requires a user to have a swinging motion. In general, the swing analysis systems can help a user or coach better by using various numerical analysis, and optionally, computer visualization, of a person's swing may be utilized to identify inefficiencies, or errors, in a user's swing motion. In order to analyze a user's swinging motion, a sensor or plurality of sensors may be positioned on the ball striking device. The sensor may include an inertial measurement unit, or IMU, capable of measuring linear accelerations and angular rates of rotation along and around three orthogonal (mutually-perpendicular) axes. The IMU may comprise a single accelerometer capable of measuring linear accelerations along three orthogonal axes or three accelerometers oriented to measure linear accelerations along three orthogonal axes, and a single gyroscope sensitive to angular velocities about same the three orthogonal axes as the accelerometer, or three gyroscopes sensitive to angular velocities about same the three orthogonal axes as the accelerometer. As discussed in further detail below, output data from one or more of these three accelerometers and/or three gyroscopes may be processed, in order to calculate and describe a motion of a ball striking device during a swing.
However, the dynamic range of acceleration and angular rate data experienced by sporting equipment or people during athletic movements can be quite large. For instance, a golf club during a slow back swing can rotate at approximately 10 degrees per second, while during the down swing the golf club may rotate at approximately 2800 degrees per second. This angular rate range of rotation may exceed the maximum range of the current state of low cost gyroscopes causing the sensor to be “saturated” for a period of time leaving the measurement incomplete. Additionally, a golf swing or a baseball swing typically may move in a primary swing plane, but other planes may see significant rotation as well. The swing planes may be different for different users making it difficult if not impossible to mount a single sensor in an orientation to reduce the risk of saturation.
While it may be possible to increase the range of the sensors, the noise and accuracy of the sensor may be degraded. However, as will be described in further detail below, by adding a redundant set of sensors, mounted off-axis such that each measurement axes is 45 degrees from the other set of sensor's measurement axes, the effective range may be increased without increasing the noise or decreasing the resolution of the sensors. This increased range may be accomplished because the axis that experiences the movement that saturates the measurement will have redundant sensors that measure the same rotation on two other axes oriented at 45 degree angles to the saturated axis. By applying a coordinate transfer rotation matrix to the redundant sensors axis, the range of the axis experiencing the saturation may be increased by creating this virtual axis. Thus, when a movement is sensed that may cause saturation of the axis measurement, the motion processing algorithm can switch to using a virtual sensor axis from the two redundant axes. The measurement range on the virtual axis may be increased by up to 40 percent.
The sensor may include at least two inertial measurement units (IMUs). An individual IMU may be a single a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) chip/circuit containing an accelerometer sensitive to linear accelerations along three orthogonal axes, and a gyroscope sensitive to angular rates of rotation or angular velocities about same the three orthogonal axes. Alternatively, the IMU may comprise a plurality of chips/circuits comprising an accelerometer capable of measuring linear accelerations along three orthogonal axes, and a gyroscope capable of measuring angular rates of rotation or angular velocities about same the three orthogonal axes.
The various figures in this application illustrate examples of ball striking devices according to this invention. When the same reference number appears in more than one drawing, that reference number is used consistently in this specification and the drawings refer to the same or similar parts throughout.
Data from these sensor or sensors 104 may be processed on-board the golf club 102 such that raw sensor data may be transformed into data describing of one or more motions of a golf club through a swing. Subsequently, this processed data may be communicated to a remote computing device for review and/or further processing. Alternatively, data from the sensors 104 may be communicated as raw sensor data to be processed by a remote computing device, such as devices 106 and/or 108. Accordingly, the golf club 102 may comprise a transceiver configured to allow for wired and/or wireless communication of data between the one or more sensors 104, and the devices 106 and/or 108. In one example, devices 106 and 108 may comprise consumer electronic equipment, such that device 106 may be a personal computer 106 and device 108 may be a mobile communication device 108, such as a tablet computer, a personal data assistant (PDA), a smartphone, and/or combinations thereof. Further, personal computer 106 may include one or more laptop computers or desktop computers. Devices 106 and 108 may be connected, via network 110, to a variety of other devices and destinations, including server 112. As such, devices 106 and 108 may include network interfaces that are either wired or wireless or may have both wired and wireless connection interfaces. Wireless connections may be short range or long range, and may include Wi-Fi, BLUETOOTH, infrared, satellite communications, cellular communications and the like. Some devices (e.g., mobile communication device 108) may include multiple network interfaces and have the capability of transmitting and receiving information over different interfaces depending on a destination/source, time of day, type of information being sent/received and the like. In one example, server 112 may be configured to collect data from various user devices as well as to distribute information such as fitness challenges, golf recommendations, product offers and the like.
As discussed above, the sensor 104 may comprise a plurality of IMUs that each may have a plurality of accelerometers configured to detect linear accelerations along one or more axes, and/or a plurality of gyroscopes, configured to detect angular rates of rotation or angular velocities about one or more axes. Each accelerometer may be able to measure along three orthogonal axes as well as each gyroscope may be able to measure angular rates of rotation or angular velocities about each of same the three orthogonal axes of the accelerometer.
As shown in
The housing 120 may enclose and protect the sensor's components from exposure to the external environment. As such, the housing 120 may comprise any shape, size and/or material configured to protect the sensor components. In one specific example, the housing 120 may comprise a material (e.g. a polymer) configured to allow transmission of radio waves, and such that wireless communication between the sensor 104, and an external computing device, such as device 106 and/or device 108, may be facilitated. In other examples, wired communication between the sensor 104 and another computing device, such as devices 106 and 108, may be facilitated.
As discussed above and shown in
The first CCA 140 may have any shape and size, but may be preferably sized to have a width and length that may enable the sensor 104 to be small enough to fit within the butt end of a golf shaft 116. The first CCA 140 may have electronic components mounted on both sides to keep the size of the sensor 104 minimized. For example, the first CCA 140 may have a width of less than 13 mm. The length may be longer than the width and may have a length that at least twice as long as the width. Also, the first CCA 140 may have a surface area larger than the second CCA 160. Alternatively, the first CCA 140 may have a circular shape and have a diameter of less than 16 mm to fit near the end of the golf grip 118.
Additionally, the second CCA 160 may have any shape and size, but may be preferably sized to have a width and length that may enable the sensor 104 to be small enough to fit within the butt end of a golf shaft 116. The second CCA 160 may have electronic components mounted on both sides similar to the first CCA 140 to keep the size of the sensor 104 minimized. The second CCA 160 may have a width of less than 13 mm and may be circular in shape having a diameter less than 13 mm to complement the shape of the first CCA 140, such that the sensor 104 may fit into the butt end of a golf shaft 116 as shown in
Keeping a proper alignment between the first IMU 150 and the second IMU 170 may help to ensure the sensor's accuracy. While it is possible to calibrate the sensor 104 after installation to minimize any misalignment errors between the first IMU 150 and the second IMU 170, in a mass production environment, it may be more cost effective to have a precisely controlled and repeatable mechanical assembly to ensure proper alignment and to ensure the accuracy of the sensor 104.
Orienting a first IMU 150 and second IMU 170 perpendicular to one another on a first CCA 140 and a second CCA 160 may require each CCA to be precisely mounted into a housing 120. The housing 120 may have substantially perpendicular surfaces that are manufactured with very tight tolerances. The first CCA 140 may be connected to a first surface and the second CCA 160 may be connected to the second surface oriented substantially perpendicular to each other. The first CCA 140 and the second CCA 160 may be then connected to each other using a flexible connector to transmit the electrical signals. By precisely mounting each CCA 140, 160 to different surfaces, the orientation between the IMUs 150, 170 may be precisely controlled and minimize the chance for misalignment. Alternatively, the first CCA 140 may be mounted to a housing surface and the second CCA 160 mounted directly to the first CCA 140 using a separate fixture to maintain the orientation or possible a rigid connector to both maintain the orientation and transmit the electrical signals. The CCAs 140, 160 may be connected to the housing 120 using mechanical means such as pins, fasteners, Wedge-Loks™, etc. Alternatively, the CCAs 140, 160 may be held in place with a potting compound or adhesive, or a combination of the two. Other connection means and mechanical means may be utilized without departing from these embodiments.
The processor 142 may be utilized to process data received from the first IMU 150 and the second IMU 170. The processor 142 may be a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor, or any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. The processor 142 may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration. The one or more implementations described throughout this disclosure may utilize logical blocks, modules, and circuits that may be implemented or performed with a processor.
The processor 142 may be used to implement various aspects and features described herein. As such, the processor 142 may be configured to perform any desired operation on one or more data streams received from the plurality of IMUs 150, 170. Further, it will be appreciated that the processor 142 may execute multiple calculations, in parallel or serial, at a very high throughput frequency using the received data from the sensor's components, in order to analyze a golf swing. As such, processor 142 may be configured to execute hundreds of thousands, millions, or billions or more calculations per second using the linear acceleration and angular rate data received from the IMUs 150, 170. Processor 142 may execute coordinate transformations, curve smoothing, noise filtering, outlier removal, amplification, and summation processes, and the like. In some examples, the sensor 104 may not utilize the processor 142 to process the data received from the IMUs 150, 170. Instead, the raw data from the sensor 104 may be communicated to one or more remote computing devices, such as devices 106 and 108, among others. The processor 142 may include a processing unit and system memory to store and execute software instructions.
The power source 144 may provide power to the sensor 104 including the processor 142, the first IMU 150, and the second IMU 170. The power source 144 may comprise, for example, a battery. The battery may be rechargeable and possibly removable.
As an alternate embodiment, the sensor 104 may have a single IMU 150 and an additional accelerometer or gyroscope oriented to measure about an axis oriented at an angle to at least one axis of the axes of the IMU 150. For example, the sensor 104 may have a first IMU 150 and at least one additional accelerometer oriented to measure linear accelerations in at least one axis oriented at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to at least one axis of the first IMU 150. As another alternate embodiment, sensor 104 may have a first IMU 150 and at least one additional gyroscope oriented to measure angular rates of rotation in an at least one axis oriented at an angle of approximately 45 degrees to at least one axis of the first IMU 150.
When the sensor 104 is positioned within the club head 114, the sensor 104 may be positioned so as to not interfere with the aerodynamics of the club 102. Moreover, club head 114 may be configured so that the masses and arrangement of the included components do not change the balance or center of gravity of the club head 114. In one implementation, the mass of the sensor 104 may be less than 7 grams, which may be less than 4% from the mass of an unmodified club head.
As discussed above, a sensor 104 may comprise a first IMU 150 and a second IMU 170 employed to generate data corresponding to the motion of a golf club 102 throughout a golf swing motion between a first time instant and a second time instant. In one example, the first time instant may correspond to a start of a golf swing motion, or may correspond to a predetermined instant prior to, or after, a detected start of a golf swing motion. Further, the second time instant may correspond to an end of a golf swing motion, or may correspond to a predetermined instant after, or before, a detected end of a golf swing motion, among others. As such, these predetermined times may include any time values, without departing from the scope of these disclosures. In turn, the IMU data may be processed to determine information about the motion of the golf club 102 throughout a swing.
The sensor 104 may have a primary coordinate system corresponding to the first axis 152, the second axis 154, and the third axis 156. Depending upon the location and orientation of the sensor 104 on the golf club 102, the linear accelerations and angular rate data of the sensor 104 may be transformed into a Cartesian axes with an x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis, based around the orientation of golf club head to the ground.
Data from the sensor 104 may be utilized to mathematically describe the motion of a golf club 102 during a golf swing. This mathematical description may include one or more functions (e.g. functions with respect to time) that may be utilized to calculate the position of a golf club 102 at any given instant in time between defined start and end points of a golf swing. As such, these functions may be used to graphically plot a swing arc, among others (e.g. plot in three dimensions for display on a computer, such as one or more of devices 106 and 108). A graphical representation of a golf swing motion may be generated for display which may be a monitor display of device 106 or device 108. In one example, the calculated golf club location in the global coordinate system may be utilized to plot a graphical representation of the golf swing. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize specific processes for generating a graphical display, as well as specific hardware elements (GPUs, and the like), any of which may be utilized with the disclosures described herein. Further, various examples of specific graphics, such as swing path coloring and shading, among others, may be utilized without departing from these disclosures. In one example, the calculated golf swing data may be utilized to compare a user's golf swing to a database of stored swing data. This stored swing data may include previous swings from the user, or model swing data. As such, in one example, this model swing data may be based upon a golf swing of a professional level golfer, among others. Accordingly, the model swing data may be compared to the calculated swing data. The comparison may indicate one or more differences between the model swing data and the calculated swing data such that a user may be provided with feedback about his/her swing.
Accordingly, one or more processes may be executed to calculate a golf club 102 location as where the processor 142 or other device 106 or device 108 may receive the linear acceleration data and angular rate data generated by the IMUs. As discussed previously, the movements of the golf swing may sometimes cause one of the accelerometers or gyroscopes to reach the maximum measurement limit, or become “saturated.” If the sensors 104 become saturated, the accuracy of the golf analysis system 100 is decreased.
The 3×3 coordinate transformation may be represented by the equation below where xr, yr, and zr represent either the linear acceleration data or the angular rate data from the second IMU 170 depending upon which data from the first IMU 150 has become saturated. The xb, yb, and zb represent either the linear acceleration data or the angular rate data of the second IMU 170 transformed to a virtual axis oriented in the same direction as the axes 152, 154, and 156 of the first IMU150, where (xr, xb), (yr, yb), and (zr, zb) constitute the angle formed between the xr axis and the xb axis, yr axis and the yb axis, and zr axis and zb axis, respectively.
In addition to increasing the range of the sensors 104, the error caused by the gyroscopic bias drift may be reduced. MEMS-type gyroscopes may have a bias drift where the measurement may vary slightly over time. The gyroscopic bias drift is difficult to predict, which makes reducing this bias drift difficult. However, by using the measurements from the second IMU 170, and comparing these measurements of the first IMU 150, the bias drift may be easier estimated and thus accounted for to remove this error making the sensor's measurement more accurate.
The gyroscopic bias drift may be calculated using a filtering method. The angular rate of rotation data from the gyroscopes of IMUs 150 and 170 may be used to create two virtual gyroscopes that are then optimally filtered to create a single virtual gyroscope with angular rate of rotation measurements about the first, second, and third axes 152, 154, 156 or a first, second, and third axes of a coordinate system different than the coordinate systems of the IMUs 150, 170. Using this method, the sensor 104 may have less gyroscopic bias drift than if the sensor 104 only had a single IMU.
Additionally, the filtering method may be a Kalman filter applied over a discrete time to continually update the bias drift of the gyroscope. The Kalman filter may have gains derived from the specific characteristics of the IMUs 150, 170 implementation.
Another problem that can affect the accuracy of the sensor 104 is noise within the linear acceleration and angular rate measurements. The noise within the sensor 104 may be reduced by a factor of the square root of 2 using an average value of the linear acceleration and angular rate data of the first IMU 150 and the linear acceleration and angular rate data of the second IMU 170 transformed to the coordinate system of the first IMU 150.
Similar to the gyroscopic bias drift, the noise may be calculated using a filtering method, such as a Kalman filter applied over a discrete time to continually update the noise on the signals. The Kalman filter may have gains derived from the specific characteristics of the IMUs 150, 170 implementation. The linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation data from the multiple IMUs 150, 170 may be used to create linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation data for two virtual IMUs. This virtual IMU data may then be filtered to create the linear accelerations and angular rate of rotation measurements about the first, second, and third axes 152, 154, 156 that have less noise than using a single IMU.
As an alternate embodiment, the linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation data for the first IMU 150 may be transformed into a third coordinate system that is different than the axes 152, 154, 156 and the linear acceleration and angular rate of rotation data for second IMU 170 may be transformed into the third coordinate system that is different than the axes 172, 174, and 176. The data from each IMU 150, 170 may be then be combined using the techniques described above to find the linear accelerations and angular rates of rotation for a third coordinate system. The gyroscopic bias drift and noise may also be calculated for the third coordinate system using the same techniques described above.
An alternate embodiment to the embodiment shown in
Similar to the embodiment shown in
The various embodiments described herein may be implemented by general-purpose or specialized computer hardware. In one example, the computer hardware may comprise one or more processors, otherwise referred to as microprocessors, having one or more processing cores configured to allow for parallel processing/execution of instructions. As such, the various disclosures described herein may be implemented as software coding, wherein those of skill in the art will recognize various coding languages that may be employed with the disclosures described herein. Additionally, the disclosures described herein may be utilized in the implementation of application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or in the implementation of various electronic components comprising conventional electronic circuits (otherwise referred to as off-the-shelf components). Furthermore, those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the various descriptions included in this disclosure may be implemented as data signals communicated using a variety of different technologies and processes. For example, the descriptions of the various disclosures described herein may be understood as comprising one or more streams of data signals, data instructions, or requests, and physically communicated as bits or symbols represented by differing voltage levels, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields, optical fields, or combinations thereof.
One or more of the disclosures described herein may comprise a computer program product having computer-readable medium/media with instructions stored thereon/therein that, when executed by a processor, are configured to perform one or more methods, techniques, systems, or embodiments described herein. As such, the instructions stored on the computer-readable media may comprise actions to be executed for performing various steps of the methods, techniques, systems, or embodiments described herein. Furthermore, the computer-readable medium/media may comprise a storage medium with instructions configured to be processed by a computing device, and specifically a processor associated with a computing device. As such, the computer-readable medium may include a form of persistent or volatile memory such as a hard disk drive (HDD), a solid state drive (SSD), an optical disk (CD-ROMs, DVDs), tape drives, floppy disk, ROM, RAM, EPROM, EEPROM, DRAM, VRAM, flash memory, RAID devices, remote data storage (cloud storage, and the like), or any other media type or storage device suitable for storing data thereon/therein. Additionally, combinations of different storage media types may be implemented into a hybrid storage device. In one implementation, a first storage medium may be prioritized over a second storage medium, such that different workloads may be implemented by storage media of different priorities.
Further, the computer-readable media may store software code/instructions configured to control one or more of a general-purpose, or a specialized computer. Said software may be utilized to facilitate interface between a human user and a computing device, and wherein said software may include device drivers, operating systems, and applications. As such, the computer-readable media may store software code/instructions configured to perform one or more implementations described herein.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, techniques, or method steps of those implementations described herein may be implemented as electronic hardware devices, computer software, or combinations thereof. As such, various illustrative modules/components have been described throughout this disclosure in terms of general functionality, wherein one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the described disclosures may be implemented as hardware, software, or combinations of both.
The one or more implementations described throughout this disclosure may utilize logical blocks, modules, and circuits that may be implemented or performed with a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor, or any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.
The techniques or steps of a method described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in software executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. In some embodiments, any software module, software layer, or thread described herein may comprise an engine comprising firmware or software and hardware configured to perform embodiments described herein. Functions of a software module or software layer described herein may be embodied directly in hardware, or embodied as software executed by a processor, or embodied as a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An example storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read data from, and write data to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user device. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user device.
Accordingly, it will be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the embodiments disclosed herein, but is to be understood from the following claims, which are to be interpreted as broadly as allowed under the law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3270564 | Evans | Sep 1966 | A |
3788647 | Evans | Jan 1974 | A |
3792863 | Evans | Feb 1974 | A |
3806131 | Evans | Apr 1974 | A |
3945646 | Hammond | Mar 1976 | A |
4898389 | Plutt | Feb 1990 | A |
4940236 | Allen | Jul 1990 | A |
4991850 | Wilhlem | Feb 1991 | A |
5221088 | McTeigue et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5233544 | Kobayashi | Aug 1993 | A |
5245537 | Barber | Sep 1993 | A |
5332225 | Ura | Jul 1994 | A |
5354063 | Curchod | Oct 1994 | A |
5364093 | Huston et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372365 | McTeigue et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5413345 | Nauck | May 1995 | A |
5429327 | Adams | Jul 1995 | A |
5441269 | Henwood | Aug 1995 | A |
5478082 | De Knight et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5507485 | Fisher | Apr 1996 | A |
5524081 | Paul | Jun 1996 | A |
5616832 | Nauck | Apr 1997 | A |
5634855 | King | Jun 1997 | A |
5681993 | Heitman | Oct 1997 | A |
5718641 | Lin | Feb 1998 | A |
5724265 | Hutchings | Mar 1998 | A |
5728006 | Teitell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5779555 | Nomura et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792000 | Weber et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792001 | Henwood | Aug 1998 | A |
5826874 | Teitell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5951410 | Butler et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955667 | Fyfe | Sep 1999 | A |
5973596 | French et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012988 | Burke | Jan 2000 | A |
6018705 | Gaudet et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6044704 | Sacher | Apr 2000 | A |
6045364 | Dugan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052654 | Gaudet et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6196932 | Marsh et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6224493 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248021 | Ognjanovic | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261102 | Dugan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270422 | Fisher | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299553 | Petuchowski et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6402634 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6413167 | Burke | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430843 | Potter et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431990 | Manwaring | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441745 | Gates | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456938 | Barnard | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6561917 | Manwaring | May 2003 | B2 |
6579190 | Yamamoto | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6607450 | Hackman | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6638175 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648769 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6697820 | Tarlie | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6757572 | Forest | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6802772 | Kunzle et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819247 | Bimbach et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821209 | Manwaring et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6876947 | Darley et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882955 | Ohlenbusch et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6900759 | Katayama | May 2005 | B1 |
6923729 | McGinty et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6929558 | Manwaring et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6991552 | Burke | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7004848 | Konow | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021140 | Perkins | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037198 | Hameen-Anttila | May 2006 | B2 |
7041014 | Wright et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7118498 | Meadows et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121962 | Reeves | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7125340 | Priester et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7160200 | Grober | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175177 | Meifu et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175511 | Ueda et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214138 | Stivers et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7234351 | Perkins | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235020 | Christensen | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7264554 | Bentley | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7264555 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7310895 | Whittlesey et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7602301 | Stirling et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7627451 | Vock et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647071 | Rofougaran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7691004 | Lueders | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7736242 | Stites et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771263 | Telford | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780535 | Hagood et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789742 | Murdock et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7800480 | Joseph et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7801575 | Balardeta et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7804404 | Balardeta et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7811182 | Ligotti, III et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7821407 | Shears et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7825815 | Shears et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831212 | Balardeta et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7837574 | Brunner | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837575 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853211 | Balardeta et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7857705 | Galloway | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7881499 | Bissonnette et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7883428 | Balardeta et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7887440 | Wright et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7892102 | Galloway | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7941097 | Balardeta et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7946926 | Balardeta et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7957767 | Rofougaran | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7978081 | Shears et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8025586 | Teramoto | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8052539 | Kimber | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8117903 | Golden et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8226495 | Savarese et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8330284 | Weston et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337335 | Dugan | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8342978 | Tamura | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8430770 | Dugan | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8465376 | Bentley | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8593286 | Razoumov et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8696450 | Rose et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8715096 | Cherbini | May 2014 | B2 |
8784228 | Morin et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801532 | Katayama | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8840483 | Steusloff et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8894502 | Rose | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8941723 | Bentley et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8994826 | Bentley | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010005695 | Lee et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010035880 | Musatov et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010053720 | Lee et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020004723 | Meifu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019677 | Lee | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049507 | Hameen-Anttila | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052246 | Burke | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052750 | Hirooka | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072815 | McDonough et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077189 | Tuer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082775 | Meadows et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107085 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123386 | Perlmutter | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151994 | Sisco | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160848 | Burke | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173364 | Boscha | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173365 | Boscha | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183657 | Socci et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030008722 | Konow | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009913 | Potter et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014134 | Morgan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036436 | Casanova et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040380 | Wright et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030132844 | Walker | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030191547 | Morse | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207718 | Perlmutter | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040067797 | Knecht | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106460 | Lee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040142603 | Walker | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040177531 | DiBenedetto et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204257 | Boscha et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225199 | Evanyk et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259651 | Storek | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050017454 | Endo et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032582 | Mahajan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037862 | Hagood et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043109 | Buckley et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054457 | Eyestone et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079922 | Priester et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096761 | Hanover et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050188566 | Whittlesey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215340 | Stites et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227775 | Cassady et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240294 | Jones et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261073 | Farrington et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050282650 | Miettinen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288119 | Wang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060025229 | Mahajan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029916 | Boscha | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040757 | Rosselli | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052173 | Telford | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063600 | Grober | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084516 | Eyestone et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089845 | Marcell et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094520 | Kostuj | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105849 | Brunner | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105853 | Glass | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109116 | Keays | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122002 | Konow | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060166737 | Bentley | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166738 | Eyestone et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184336 | Kolen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194178 | Goldstein | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199659 | Caldwell | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224306 | Workman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060276256 | Storek | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287118 | Wright et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006489 | Case et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010341 | Miettinen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011919 | Case | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070087866 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111811 | Grober | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129178 | Reeves | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135225 | Nieminen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135237 | Reeves | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191126 | Mandracken | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070238538 | Priester | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270214 | Bentley | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080039222 | Kiraly | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051208 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080076580 | Murdock et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085778 | Dugan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080085788 | Rainer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125288 | Case | May 2008 | A1 |
20080188310 | Murdock | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200275 | Wagen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080218343 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242354 | Rofougaran | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287205 | Katayama | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080318703 | Mooney | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018795 | Priester et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048070 | Vincent et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090111602 | Savarese et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120197 | Golden et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131190 | Kimber | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131191 | Priester et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090163285 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165530 | Golden et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090165531 | Golden et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090203460 | Clark | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209358 | Niegowski | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090247312 | Sato et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254204 | Kostuj | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090260426 | Lieberman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270743 | Dugan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100048314 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049468 | Papadourakis | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063778 | Schrock et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063779 | Schrock et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100067566 | Rofougaran et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100093457 | Ahem et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100093458 | Davenport et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099509 | Ahem et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113174 | Ahem | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117837 | Stirling et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121227 | Stirling et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121228 | Stirling et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130298 | Dugan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100144455 | Ahem | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100144456 | Ahem | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100154255 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201512 | Stirling et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210371 | Sato et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216563 | Stites et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216564 | Stites et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216565 | Stites et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222152 | Jaekel et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100255922 | Lueders | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100304877 | Iwahashi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308105 | Savarese et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028230 | Balardeta et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053698 | Stites et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110081978 | Murdock et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082571 | Murdock et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087344 | Murdock et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092260 | Murdock et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110130223 | Murdock et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151977 | Murdock et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110212757 | Murdock et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224011 | Denton et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224025 | Balardeta et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230273 | Niegowski et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110281621 | Murdock et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110306435 | Seo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120019140 | Maxik et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052972 | Bentley | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120120572 | Bentley | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191405 | Molyneux et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120289354 | Cottam et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130041590 | Burich et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130065711 | Ueda et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130260922 | Yontz et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130324274 | Stites | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140228649 | Rayner et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140323235 | Stites et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140364246 | Davenport | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379295 | Sato | Dec 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2139690 | Jul 1996 | CA |
2411030 | Dec 2000 | CN |
2487416 | Apr 2002 | CN |
2688331 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1984698 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101352609 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101918090 | Dec 2010 | CN |
101927084 | Dec 2010 | CN |
202007013632 | Dec 2007 | DE |
2332619 | Jun 2011 | EP |
S62176470 | Aug 1987 | JP |
H03-60680 | Mar 1991 | JP |
H0355077 | Mar 1991 | JP |
H06237 | Jan 1994 | JP |
H08000785 | Jan 1996 | JP |
H08131599 | May 1996 | JP |
H08173586 | Jul 1996 | JP |
2001264016 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2006247023 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2008506421 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008073210 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008289866 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009534546 | Sep 2009 | JP |
06000237 | Sep 2016 | JP |
20060090501 | Aug 2006 | KR |
1020060114969 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070095407 | Sep 2007 | KR |
20090129246 | Dec 2009 | KR |
20100020131 | Feb 2010 | KR |
20100051153 | May 2010 | KR |
20100095917 | Sep 2010 | KR |
101002846 | Dec 2010 | KR |
20110005247 | Jan 2011 | KR |
1999065574 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0215993 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2004056425 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005094953 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005118086 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006014459 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2012027726 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012138543 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2012149385 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2016054249 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jul. 6, 2017—WO (ISR)—App. No. PCT/US17/030028. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170312609 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |