Patent Application
20080064533
The scoring system will further be described as a baseball golf scramble or “baseball” for short. Since a specific hitting order for the golfers participating is employed, this can be thought of as a batting order. In addition, each team has a manager who keeps the official score. There are hits and outs, and team outs. Each Player has an individual batting average, which is calculated by dividing an individuals total shots used by their total shots taken and the team can have combined batting average by adding up each of the individual batting averages. There is a leadoff hitter on each hole and the holes may be thought of as innings.
Compared to a traditional golf scramble, baseball golf presents the opportunity to have more individual hole winners; and with stats for batting averages, awards can be given for front, back, total, individual, and team batting titles, by way of non-limiting example.
The general rules of the game are set forth as follows:
1. Each team shall designate one of its members to be the manager with the manager establishing a batting order to be followed throughout the game.
2. Each Player shall hit in order with the order carrying over from the green to the next tee.
3. Points are awarded from the scoring tables for the least number of shots taken and used on each hole.
4. A team out is the failure to score par or better on any given hole. No points are awarded for holes where the team has made an out.
5. If a team includes a total of four Players and all four Players fail to put their shot in play, the team must take a penalty shot in order to continue play.
6. Any score off the scale of the scoring table, such as for a double eagle e.g., a score of two on a par five, or a hole in one on a par four, will be given the top score available on the scoring table.
7. You can use any previous shot but you must count all shots taken thereafter and include them when determining the points to be awarded for the hole.
8. The team with the highest point total for the entire game is the overall winner.
In view of the foregoing description and rules of the game, various examples of point scoring are set forth below by comparing the shots taken to the team score for the hole and comparing this factor to the scoring table which sets out the point possibilities per hole.
Team 1, Player 1 hits a great shot to the middle of the fairway. The team uses this shot, the count is 1/1.
Team 1, Player 2 hits a poor shot from the middle of the fairway. The team decides to hit again. The count is 2/1.
Team 1, Player 3 hits a bad shot also. The team decides to bat again. The count is 3/1.
Team 1, Player 4 hits on the green. The team uses this shot. The count is 4/2.
Now it is Player 1 who must hit again. Player 1 makes the putt. The count is 5/3.
Team 1—FINAL SCORE FOR THE HOLE: 5/3.
A 5/3 is worth 23 points. (See Par Four scoring table.)
Team 1, Player 2 would hit first on the next hole and the rotation would continue in order until the team is “out” with no possibility of scoring points on the hole or until a score for the hole is achieved and compared to the scoring table to determine the appropriate number of points to award for the hole. Keeping the appropriate hitting order (i.e., players' rotation) an example for a par 5 hole is also provided.
Team 1, Player 2 hits out of bounds. The team decides to bat again. The count is 1/0.
Team 1, Player 3 hits short. The team bats again. The count is 2/0.
Team 1, Player 4 hits a good tee shot. The team uses this shot. The count is 3/1.
Team 1, Player 1, who is the next player in the rotation after Player 4, hits poorly. The team wants to bat again. The count is 4/1.
Team 1, Player 2 hits in the water. The team bats again. The count is 5/1.
Team 1, Player 3 hits short of the green. The team decides to use this shot. The count is 6/2.
Team 1, Player 4 hits into the trees. The team chooses to bat again. The count is 7/2.
Team 1, Player 1, who is the next player in the rotation after Player 4, shanks one. The team bats again. The count is 8/2.
Team 1, Player 2 chips onto the green. The team uses this shot. The count is 9/3.
Team 1, Player 3 putts from position 3 on the green and misses. The count is 10/3. The team decides not to use this shot.
Team 1, Player 4 putts and misses. The count is 11/3.
Team 1, Player 1, who is the next player in the rotation after Player 4, putts up very close to the hole. The team uses this shot. The count is 12/4.
Team 1, Player 2 putts from position 4 and misses the putt. The count is 13/4. The team decides not to use this shot.
Team 1, Player 3 makes the putt. The count is 14/5.
Team 1—FINAL SCORE FOR THE HOLE: 14/5.
A 14/5 is worth 8 points. (See Par Five scoring table.)
Team 1, Player 4 bats first the next inning (i.e., on the next hole). Assuming for purposes of discussion that the next hole is a par 3, yet another example of awarding points for the hole is presented.
Team 1, Player 4 is the lead-off man. He hits one in the water. The count is 1/0.
Team 1, Player 1, who is the next player in the rotation after Player 4, hits a good shot on the green. The team decides to use this shot. The count is 2/1.
Team 1, Player 2 misses the putt. The count is 3/1.
Team 1, Player 3 misses the putt. The count is 4/1.
Team 1, Player 4 missed the putt. The count is 5/1.
Team 1, Player 1, who is the next player in the rotation after Player 4, batting clean-up from this position, misses the putt.
At this point, Team 1 takes the position of the best putt making the count 6/2 with scorer noting which player's putt was selected for purposes of calculating each player's batter average.
Team 1, Player 2 bats next and makes the putt. The count is 7/3.
Team 1—FINAL SCORE FOR THE HOLE: 7/3
A 7/3 is worth 6 points. (See Par Three scoring table.)
Team 1, Player 3 leads-off next inning.
In view of the above described rules and examples presented, a mock score card is presented in
While the above described method of scoring the subject golf game has been demonstrated with regard to teams comprising four players per team, it should be understood that the game can be easily modified to account for teams having any number of multiple players, e.g., two, three or four person teams, etc., with specific scoring tables provided for each combination of players per team. This game could also be played by individuals in a head-to-head competition or tournament play.
Further, while a scoring table such as that shown in
To facilitate one or more of the objectives of the golf game described herein, it is possible to employ electronic tablets (computer) having a specifically designed software program whereby the manager enters the scoring data for the holes into the computer and the computer in turn calculates the number of points to be awarded by comparing the data to a scoring table embedded in the software. As can be appreciated, the use of computers would allow for real-time scoring by remote transmission of the data to a central computer so that the results of the event could be available almost simultaneously with the entry of the last groups' data from the last hole played. As can be further appreciated, use of computerized scoring means will speed up the time needed to complete the golf event which is a common problem with golf outings generally.
Other examples of useful electronic scoring systems that may be employed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention are presented in the following list of patents: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,571,143; 5,949,679; 5,779,566; 5,779,549; 5,504,312; 5,283,733; and 4,910,677, each of which is freely incorporated by reference.
In order to allow for longest drive and closest to the pin contests which are traditional golf outing awards, a flex rule can be used. Under the flex rule, teams would count shots “taken” and “used” as normal by designating a shot to be “used” by the team prior to other teammates hitting from the tee box. This way, all team members are still eligible to qualify for the longest drive and closest to the pin awards even though they are ineligible for purposes of their shot being used by the team once the team has declared that a preceding shot is to be used as the team shot. Once the team shot is declared, the rotation for the next shot follows the original order even though all team members may participate in the closest to the pin and/or longest drive competitions.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60824928 | Sep 2006 | US |
