The present invention relates to a golf head made of multiple materials to achieve variable weight distribution, whereby the central area of the golf head has minimal mass, and the periphery has maximum mass distribution to maximize the rotational inertia of the golf head. In addition, the periphery is comprised of molded ports to facilitate weight adjustment means.
The performance of a golf head is determined by the physical characteristics of the head such as weight, weight distribution, and rotational moment of inertia. There are other geometric factors which play a role such as face size, face angle, offset, lie angle, etc., but these are not the purpose of the present invention.
The present invention can be applied to a “wood” type head such as a driver or fairway wood, and also a putter. The objective is to take advantage of light weight materials such as fiber reinforced composites, which can provide a reduced weight in the central region of the golf head, and allow molded in higher weight at the periphery, using ports to easily accommodate different weight distributions.
The modern golf club head has used composite materials to achieve different weight distributions. Composite materials, being lighter in weight than metal, can produce a lighter weight golf head with allows for greater weight to be focused in specific locations to achieve desired performance properties.
The below listed U.S. patents and patent applications to the Callaway Golf Company all discuss the use of different materials such as composites to achieve different performance characteristics:
In addition to concentrating weight at specific locations, it is also desirable to be able to easily adjust the location of weight to accommodate different player preferences. There are numerous patents on weight adjustment means.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,452 to Helmstetter, et. al., describes a multiple material golf head with an internal weighting strip to change the center of gravity of the golf head. However, this design does not allow for quick and easy weight adjustment.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,612 to Evans, et. al., discloses a golf head with a weighting device comprised of a polymer material, which has a plurality of cavities for placement of high density pellets within some or all of the cavities. This weighting device is removable from the golf head and not integrally molded in, meaning that weight is required for the weighting device which reduces the amount of weight available for adjustment.
U.S. Patent Application No. US2002/0137576 to Dammen discloses a golf club head with weight adjustment means using moveable screws of high specific gravity which are screwed into threaded sleeves inside the golf head. The amount of weight adjustment is limited because the club head is made of metal, which is heavy, as well as the threaded sleeves. It is also limited by the requirement of using threaded means to attach the adjustment weights.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,089,994 to Sun discloses a golf head with a receptacle in its sole with a plurality of apertures for receiving weights. The weight of the removable receptacle limits the amount of adjustment weight. In addition, this design is limited to the sole of the club head.
U.S. Patent Application US2006/0105856 to Lo describes a golf club head with recessed portions, into which are inserted weight members comprised of a lid portion, protrusions, and engaging means. The lid portions can change orientation in the recessed portion, which allows for rapid adjustment of the weight distribution of the club head. This is limited by the weight distribution within each lid portion, and the amount of adjustment weight is limited due to the weight of the lid and engaging means.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,004,852 to Billings describes a golf club head having a hollow cavity with a weighting port. The weighting port allows a user to place weighting material inside the golf head to adjust the center of gravity of the golf head. It is assumed the weighting material is bonded to the interior wall of the golf head, but exactly how to do this is not detailed. It is difficult to precisely locate the weighting material. It is also possible the weighting material may come loose over time and create a rattle noise.
U.S. Patents and patent applications which describe other weight adjustment means are listed below:
Pub. No. US2002/0022532; Pub. No. US2002/0032075; Pub. No. US2004/0132541; Pub. No. US2004/0138003; Pub. No. US2005/0107185
US2006/0035717; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,244,210; 5,385,348; 5,518,243; 5,533,730; 6,254,494; 6,270,422; 6,306,048; 6,364,788; and 6,530,848.
There exists a continuing need for an improved golf head that has the combined features of low central weight portion, a high perimeter weight portion, and adjustment means to change the weight distribution along the perimeter.
The present invention is a “wood” type golf club head, such as a driver, or a putter. The golf club head comprises a face, a hollow body having an outer surface, and a hosel. The hollow body has an upper surface and a sole. Viewed from above, the hollow body has an outer periphery and a peripheral region containing said outer periphery. The upper surface has a first center portion, located inwardly of the peripheral region, and the sole has a second center portion, located inwardly of the peripheral region. Finally, the outer peripheral region has an average weight-per-square centimeter of outer surface area which is substantially greater than the average weight-per-square centimeter of outer surface area of the center portions.
The face of the club head and the hosel are preferably formed of a heavier material such as steel or titanium.
The peripheral region of the club head body can be comprised of a metal material to increase the perimeter weighting, or weight inserts located inside a light weight material body to achieve a similar effect. Preferably, the light weight body has ports formed along the periphery to accommodate heavy inserts which can be easily inserted and removed to quickly adjust the weight distribution of the club head.
The light weight body is preferably made from fiber reinforced composite. The ports are formed in the composite shell by a molding process that forms at least one, and preferably a series, of “ports” that extend into the hollow club head. The ports provide a means to insert different weight plugs to change the weight distribution of the club head.
An alternative design is to have the peripheral wall of the port extend through the club head, between holes in opposing sides, to form a through passage. Each port is defined by a peripheral wall, the opposite ends of which are bonded to the walls of the club head. The wall forming the port, which extends between opposite sides of the club head, preferably is shaped to act as opposing arches which provide additional strength, stiffness, comfort, and aesthetic benefits.
The center portions of the club head are comprised of a light weight material such as carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin to minimize the weight in this area. An alternative design is to create a zero weight area in the central portion by forming a large port in this area.
The present invention applies preferably to wood type golf club heads and putter heads, or any golf club head which has a hollow body to it to take advantage of the improved stability resulting from improved perimeter weighting.
The present invention provides a high ratio of weight in the peripheral region to weight in the center regions.
The present invention provides easy adjustment means for distributing weight around the perimeter of the club head.
The present invention is provides a high ratio of weight adjustment means in proportion to total club head weight.
The present invention provides an option of tubular internal reinforcements by connecting ports on opposite sides of the club head.
The present invention provides a new and improved golf club head which may be easily and efficiently manufactured.
The present invention provides a new and improved golf club head which is of durable and reliable construction.
The present invention provides a new and improved golf club head which may be manufactured at low cost with regard to both materials and labor
The present invention provides an improved golf club head that has an improved sweet spot size resulting in reduced shot dispersion for off center hits, and greater shock absorption.
The present invention provides an improved golf club head where the stiffness of the body can be affected by the orientation of the through ports.
The present invention provides an improved golf shaft that has a unique look and improved aesthetics.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of descriptions and should not be regarded as limiting.
For a better understanding of the invention and its advantages, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which there are illustrated preferred embodiments of the invention.
a,b,c shows alternative designs of
The same reference numerals refer to the same parts throughout the various Figures.
The shell 10, viewed from above, has an outer periphery 13 which extends from the heel, around the rear of the shell 10, to the toe generally in a horizontal plane. A peripheral region 17, whose approximate boundary is defined by broken line 15, also extends above and below the periphery from the heel, around the rear of the shell 10, to the toe. Thus, a center portion 19 lies inside the boundary 15. A similar center portion is preferably present in the sole. However, if it is desired to lower the center of gravity, additional weight may be added to the center portion of the sole.
The peripheral region 17 can be molded as a one piece unit with the remainder of the shell 10 and optionally also the front face 18 and the hosel 20. The peripheral region 17 is preferably fabricated of a heavier material than the remainder of the shell 10 to increase the polar moment of inertia of the club head, so to resist off center hits. Thus, the center portion 19 of the club head and, if desired, the corresponding center portion on the sole, is fabricated of a light weight material such as carbon fiber reinforced composite to minimize weight in this area.
The shell 10 can be molded with “ports” around its perimeter 13 for receiving weight plugs 21.
A plurality of “ports” 24 are formed in the wall of the shell 10, preferably along the outer periphery 13, which connects between the toe region 16 and heel region 14. The ports 24 extend into the hollow cavity of the shell 10, or are molded as a ported ribbon, both options of which are described further below. Each port is preferably round or oval in cross-sectional shape, with the axis of the ports in line with the horizontal. Each port 24 can receive a weight plug 21, whose external shape corresponds to the interior shape of the port 24. The plugs 21 can be secured inside the ports 24 in any suitable manner.
Each port 24 includes a peripheral wall 26 that extends from the outer shell 10 to the closed end 28 of the port. The ports can be of any size and quantity depending on the amount of weight distribution desired. The ports, being fabricated of a light weight composite material, minimize the weight of the club head to allow for greater weight adjustment means.
An alternative way of molding ports into the club head is shown in
The design described in
Another option using the 2 tube molding process is to create at least one port which extends through the hollow interior of the club head, between opposite sides.
This option provides several advantages. As oriented in
The though port 24 can also affect the stiffness of the club head body. The location, orientation, size, and construction of the through port will determine the performance of the club head. This can affect how the ball rebounds off the face of the club head, as well as the sound of the ball impact.
Another design alternative is shown in
Alternatively, the weight savings from port 30 can be redistributed in the form of weight plugs located in ports molded around the perimeter 13 of the club head 10.
The port 30 can be of any shape and size. For example, the port 30 can be the approximate shape of a golf ball to aid the golfer in position and alignment.
In addition to traditional materials such as steel and titanium, the fabrication of the golf club head of the present invention is preferably made from a long fiber reinforced composite materials. Traditional lightweight composite structures have been made by preparing an intermediate material known as a prepreg which is used to mold the final structure.
A prepreg is formed by embedding the fibers, such as carbon, glass, and others, in resin. This is typically done using a prepreg machine, which applies the non-cured resin over the fibers so they are all wetted out. The resin is at an “B Stage” meaning that only heat and pressure are required to complete the cross linking and harden and cure the resin. Thermoset resins like epoxy are popular because they are available in liquid form at room temperature, which facilitates the embedding process.
A thermoset is created by a chemical reaction of two components, forming a material in a nonreversible process. Usually, the two components are available in liquid form, and after mixing together, will remain a liquid for a period of time before the cross-linking process begins. It is during this “B Stage” that the prepreg process happens, where the resin coats the fibers. Common thermoset materials are epoxy, polyester, vinyl, phenolic, polyimide, and others.
The prepreg sheets are cut and stacked according to a specific sequence, paying attention to the fiber orientation of each ply.
Each prepreg layer comprises an epoxy resin combined with unidirectional parallel fibers from the class of fibers including but not limited to carbon fibers, glass fibers, aramid fibers, and boron fibers.
The prepreg is cut into strips at various angles and laid up on a table. The strips are then stacked in an alternating fashion such that the fibers of each layer are different to the adjacent layers. For example, one layer may be +45 degrees, the next layer −45 degrees. If more bending stiffness is desired, a fiber angle such as zero degrees is used. If more torsional stiffness is desired, a higher proportion of higher angle strips such as ±45 degree strips are used. Other fiber angles may also be used.
This layup, which comprises various strips of prepreg material, is then prepared for molding. Referring to
An manufacturing method to produce a through port design such as shown in
The above method can also be used to fabricate the structure shown in
Referring again to
Next, a pair of inflatable bladders 40a, 40b, are inserted in the prepreg form 34 such that their facing walls 35a, 35b are aligned with the holes 37.
Referring to
The ends of the prepreg plugs 41 preferably extend beyond the outer surfaces of the prepreg form 34, as shown in
Air fittings are applied to the ends of each bladder. The mold is then closed over the prepreg form 34 and placed in a heated platen press. For epoxy resins, the temperature is typically around 350 degrees F. While the mold is being heated, the bladders 40a, 40b are internally pressurized, which compresses the prepreg material and forces the prepreg form 34 to assume the shape of the mold. At the same time, the heat cures the epoxy resin. The bladders also compress the peripheral walls of the plug 41, so that the inwardly facing surface of each plug conforms to the shape of the mold pin 43 (which is preferably oval). At the same time, the heat and pressure cause the ends of the plug walls to bond to the wall of the prepreg form 34.
Once cured, the mold is opened in the reverse sequence of packing. The pins 43 are typically removed first, followed by the mold halves.
The composite material used is preferably carbon fiber reinforced epoxy because the objective is to provide reinforcement at the lightest possible weight. Other fibers may be used such as fiberglass, aramid, boron and others. Other thermoset resins may be used such as polyester and vinyl ester. Thermoplastic resins may also be used such as nylon, ABS, PBT and others.
The size and spacing of the ports can affect weight distribution in a desirable way. A larger or longer port can accept a higher weight plug. Changing the weight distribution more toward the toe, or the heel, or the rear of the club head will affect performance to accommodate a variety of playing styles.
The ports can be designed to allow for rapid weight changes. The ports can be designed to accommodate a quick release mechanism, so that a weight may be added in rapid fashion. For example, a retaining ring could be located within the cylinder of the port to act as a retention device for the weight. Another option is to vary the diameter of the molded ports, so that the diameter near the exterior of the club head is greater than the interior, to lock in the weight plugs.
As to the manner of usage and operation of the present invention, the same should be apparent from the above description. Accordingly, no further discussion relating to the manner of usage and operation will be provided.
With respect to the above description then, it is to be realized that the optimum dimensional relationships for the parts of the invention, to include variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use, are deemed readily apparent and obvious to one skilled in the art, and all equivalent relationships to those illustrated in the drawings and described in the specification are intended to be encompassed by the present invention.
Therefore, the foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1960110 | Iles | May 1934 | A |
2056335 | Wettlaufer | Oct 1936 | A |
3708172 | Rango | Jan 1973 | A |
4032156 | Clarke | Jun 1977 | A |
D257869 | MacDougall | Jan 1981 | S |
D285231 | Solomon | Aug 1986 | S |
4944515 | Shearer | Jul 1990 | A |
5244210 | Au | Sep 1993 | A |
5385348 | Wargo | Jan 1995 | A |
5447309 | Vincent | Sep 1995 | A |
5518243 | Redman | May 1996 | A |
5533730 | Ruvang | Jul 1996 | A |
5570886 | Rigal et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
6059669 | Pearce | May 2000 | A |
6089994 | Sun | Jul 2000 | A |
6123627 | Antonious | Sep 2000 | A |
6248025 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254494 | Hasebe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270422 | Fisher | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6306048 | McCabe et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6364788 | Helmstetter et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386990 | Reyes et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406378 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406381 | Murphy et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6409612 | Evans et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6440008 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6471604 | Hocknell et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6491592 | Cackett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6530848 | Gillig | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6565452 | Helmstetter et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575845 | Galloway et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582323 | Soracco et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592466 | Helmstetter et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607423 | Arcayan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607623 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612938 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634955 | Middleton | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648772 | Vincent et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663504 | Hocknell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D486542 | Burrows | Feb 2004 | S |
6739982 | Murphy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6758763 | Murphy et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6881159 | Galloway et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6984181 | Hettinger et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994637 | Murphy et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004852 | Billings | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7147573 | DiMarco | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7166041 | Evans | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7314418 | Galloway et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351161 | Beach | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7416496 | Galloway et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7445563 | Werner | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7563178 | Rae et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020022532 | Tucker, Sr. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032075 | Vatsvog | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020137576 | Dammen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040132541 | MacIlraith | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138003 | Grace | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050107185 | Lu | May 2005 | A1 |
20060035717 | Cover et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060094528 | Murphy et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105856 | Lo | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070293344 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |