Patent Grant
11541295
This invention was not made as part of a federally sponsored research or development project.
The present invention relates to the field of golf training systems; particularly, to a golf swing speed training system.
In the game of golf, it is desirable for a golfer to make the longest drives possible while maintaining consistency and accuracy. However, many golfers try to force the drive, swinging harder than they normally would; and as a result, both consistency and accuracy of the golf drives decrease. To try to overcome the limitations of trying of increasing the swing speed by brute force, various golf swing training devices have entered the market. Unfortunately, they prove to be limiting in weight customization, simulated shaft length and feel, and simulating the functional physics of a real golf club. As a result, the unfortunate golfer may learn bad habits from the poorly designed golf swing speed training devices.
The present invention advances the art by providing a highly customizable golf swing speed trainer that more accurately mimics the feel of a real club as they work to increase their swing speed, without introducing any new bad habits. Furthermore, the present invention allows a golfer to use their “gamer” shaft and grip during speed training, thereby increasing the user's familiarity with the trainer, which should result not only in increased swing speed but also improved consistency and accuracy.
Without limiting the scope of the present invention as claimed below and referring now to the drawings and figures:
These drawings are provided to assist in the understanding of the exemplary embodiments as described in more detail below and should not be construed as unduly limiting the present invention. In particular, the relative spacing, positioning, sizing and dimensions of the various elements illustrated in the drawings are not drawn to scale and may have been exaggerated, reduced or otherwise modified for the purpose of improved clarity. Those of ordinary skill in the art will also appreciate that a range of alternative configurations have been omitted simply to improve the clarity and reduce the number of drawings.
The swing speed trainer (50) of the instant invention enables a significant advance in the state of the art. The preferred embodiments of the device accomplish this by new and novel arrangements of elements and methods that are configured in unique and novel ways and which demonstrate previously unavailable but preferred and desirable capabilities. The detailed description set forth below in connection with the drawings is intended merely as a description of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and is not intended to represent the only form in which the present invention may be constructed or utilized. The description sets forth the designs, functions, means, and methods of implementing the invention in connection with the illustrated embodiments. It is to be understood, however, that the same or equivalent functions and features may be accomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to be encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention.
In the sport of golf, a golfer's swing speed is a major factor that determines how far a golf ball travels. However, many errant golf-swings are made because the golfer tries to over swing the club, thereby sacrificing consistency and accuracy. The current invention is designed to help a golfer increase their swing speed while maintaining club control.
The swing speed trainer (50) includes a head (100), a sleeve (200), a retainer (300), and a weighting system (400), as illustrated in
A benefit of the present swing speed trainer (50) is that it is designed to be installed on a golfer's existing golf club shaft. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, majority of drivers sold today include club head adjustability features, which generally consist of a sleeve mounted on the end of a shaft and configured such that a user can adjust the position of the sleeve within the golf club head to adjust the orientation of the club head with respect to the shaft, thereby changing the loft, face angle, and/or lie angle. Generally a golfer has made a significant investment in the purchase of their driver, often having also invested even more for a custom fitting service to determine the best club head and shaft configuration for the individual golfer's swing. Further, golfers are often very particular about the golf grip that they prefer, including the look, style, and size of the grip, as some golfers prefer mid-size grips, others prefer oversized grips, and still others may utilize orthopedic grips, which are often referred to as arthritic grips. Therefore, it only makes sense that the golfer would ideally use the shaft that they know and love when practicing their golf swing, which includes what is commonly referred to as speed training. After all, the feel and flex of a shaft influences the golf swing, particularly if it varies significantly from that which is comfortable, or known, to the golfer; and the same is also true with respect to the grip.
The head (100) may include a spindle (110), a spindle bore (130), a support plate (140), a retainer recess (150), a spindle bore flange (160), and/or a spindle bore flange aperture (170), as seen in
The spindle bore (130) may include a spindle bore depth (132), a spindle bore proximal diameter (134), a spindle bore distal diameter (136), a spindle bore to spindle sidewall thickness (138), and a spindle bore to feed region thickness (139), as illustrated in
Some embodiments of the head (100) include a support plate (140), as seen in
The retainer recess (150) has a retainer recess depth (152), and a retainer recess diameter (154), illustrated in
The head (100) may incorporate other features designed to retain the weights on the head (100) in lieu of, or in addition to, the support plate (140). For example, the spindle side wall (116) may include one or more channels that cooperate with and receive a projection extending from an internal opening in a weight, such as a weight indexing boss (407) illustrated in
Now referring to the sleeve (200) as seen in
In one embodiment, the sleeve bore depth (212) falls within the range of 30-60 mm. In another embodiment, the sleeve bore depth (212) falls within the range of 35-55 mm. In still yet another embodiment, the sleeve bore depth (212) falls within the range of 40-50 mm. Furthermore, at least a portion of the sleeve bore diameter, whether it be the sleeve bore proximal diameter (214), the sleeve bore distal diameter (216), or somewhere in between, is equal to, or less than, a dimension of a portion of the shaft sleeve (700), thereby ensuring a tight fit and reducing stress on the shaft sleeve (700) during use. At least a portion of the sleeve (200) is composed of compressible material so that the shaft sleeve (700) may be forced into the sleeve (200) despite having a cross-sectional dimension larger than the sleeve bore diameter to achieve a tight fit. While a portion of the sleeve (200) is compressible, it is not so compliant that it compresses significantly during use and allows the shaft axis to deviate significantly from the axis of the spindle bore (130), because doing would place high stress on the shaft sleeve insert threaded portion (745) of the shaft sleeve (700), the spindle bore flange aperture (170), and the retainer (300). In one embodiment the compressible portion of the sleeve (200) has a durometer of 50-100 Shore A, and 60-90 Shore A in a further embodiment, and 65-85 Shore A in still another embodiment. Another embodiment has the compressible portion of the sleeve (200) with a durometer of 20-80 Shore D, and 30-70 Shore D in a further embodiment, and 40-60 Shore D in yet another embodiment. In one embodiment the sleeve (200) is formed of a single homogenous material, while in another embodiment the sleeve (200) contains a compressible liner having the previously disclosed properties and a thickness of at least 2 mm, and at least 4 mm in a further embodiment. In an embodiment the hardness preferably allows a user to force the shaft sleeve (700) into the sleeve (200) under an axial load of 20 lbf or less, and 15 lbf or less in a further embodiment, and 10 lbf or less in yet another embodiment. In one embodiment the spindle bore proximal diameter (134) is less than the spindle bore distal diameter (136) to facilitate the aforementioned attributes.
The sleeve (200) may include a sleeve bore flange (220) having a sleeve bore flange thickness (222), as seen in
The retainer (300) may include a retainer head (310) and a retainer shank (320). The retainer head (310) has a retainer head diameter (312) and a retainer head length (314). The retainer shank (320) has a retainer shank length (322), a retainer shank diameter (324), and retainer threads (326), as seen in
As seen in
The weight inner diameter (402) is slightly larger than the spindle diameter (120) to allow the spindle (110) to pass through the weight inner diameter (402) aperture, while at the same time preventing excess movement of the weights on the spindle (110) during a practice swing. The weights of the weighting system (400) may be composed of, but not limited to polymers, plastic, rubber, composites such as composite materials, metal, alloys, wood, stone, leather; or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, the weighting system (400) may be further composed of magnetic rubber material that may be attracted to one another and/or the head (100), or may simply incorporate a distinct magnet(s) within the weight(s), thereby preventing excess movement of the weights during usage.
In one embodiment using paired weights, the first weight (410) may have a weight in the range of 16-30 grams, and 18-26 grams in another embodiment, and 19-24 grams in yet a further embodiment. Similarly, the second weight (420) may have a weight in the range of 11-24 grams, and 13-20 grams in another embodiment, and 15-18 grams in yet a further embodiment. Likewise, the third weight (430) may have a weight in the range of 7-15 grams, and 8-12 grams in another embodiment, and 9-12 grams in yet a further embodiment. Further, the fourth weight (440) may have a weight in the range of 3-10 grams, and 4-9 grams in another embodiment, and fourth3-7 grams. Lastly, the fifth weight (450) may have a weight in the range of 0.5-5 grams, and 1-4 grams in another embodiment, and 1.5-3 grams in yet a further embodiment.
In one embodiment using non-paired weights, the first weight (410) may have a weight in the range of 32-60 grams, and 36-52 grams in another embodiment, and 38-48 grams in yet a further embodiment. Similarly, the second weight (420) may have a weight in the range of 22-48 grams, and 26-40 in another embodiment, and 30-36 grams in yet a further embodiment. Likewise, the third weight (430) may have a weight in the range of 14-30 grams, and 16-24 grams in another embodiment, and 18-24 grams in yet a further embodiment. Further, the fourth weight (440) may have a weight in the range of 6-20 grams, and 8-18 grams in another embodiment, and 6-22 grams in yet a further embodiment. Lastly, the fifth weight (450) may have a weight in the range of 1-10 grams, and 2-8 grams in another embodiment, and 3-6 grams in yet a further embodiment.
The swing speed trainer (50) may be configured to achieve the goals associated with several distinct training levels. Generally speed training of the golf swing is associated with tee shots hit with a driver, therefore the bulk of this disclosure will focus on drivers and the configurations in Table 1 below, however one skilled in the art will appreciate how the disclosure is applicable to all other golf clubs including, but not limited to, 3-woods, 5-woods, and 3-hybrid, and their related disclosure in the table below. As previously disclosed with respect to ranges for the various weights, the mass of the head (100), the sleeve (200), and the retainer (300) also fall into preferred ranges, also disclosed in Tables 2 and 3, to achieve the desired configurability of the system to achieve the necessary flexibility to address multiple desired system mass ranges.
Now referring to Table 1 and using the “driver” row as an example, the typical head weight of a driver is 180-215 grams. In order to safely and effectively increase a golfer's swing speed the golfer should practice with the swing speed trainer (50) configured to achieve two distinctly different weight configurations, and in a further embodiment—three distinctly different weight configurations. The first configuration, namely “configuration A” in the Table 1, is intended to be significantly lighter than the head weight of the driver that has become familiar to the user, which in one embodiment means approximately 15-30% less. In this configuration the load is significantly reduced and the golfers swing speed should increase in proportion to the % reduction in mass; specifically, in one embodiment the practice swing speed should increase over the user's original swing speed (using their driver) according to the following:
(a) % increase of new configuration A swing speed>0.75 times the % of mass reduction
(b) % increase of new configuration A swing speed<1.25 times the % of mass reduction Therefore, if configuration A is 20% less, then the practice swing speed associated with this configuration should be 15-25% higher than the original swing speed.
Next, the second configuration, namely “configuration B” in Table 1, is intended to be heavier than the head weight of the driver that has become familiar to the user, which in one embodiment means approximately 5-25% more. In this embodiment the load is increased and strength is built as the golfer tries to maintain the swing speed developed while training with configuration A, however doing do will be difficult or impossible. However, the user will still be able to achieve a reliable swing that is under control with a swing speed that is higher than the user's original swing speed. In one embodiment the practice swing speed should increase over the user's original swing speed (using their driver) according to the following:
(a) % increase of new configuration B swing speed>0.25 times the % of mass increase (b) % increase of new configuration B swing speed<1.00 times the % of mass increase Therefore, if configuration B is 10% more than the head weight of the driver, then the practice swing speed associated with this configuration should be 2.5-10% higher than the original swing speed.
Further, another embodiment incorporates a “configuration C”, which as seen in Table 1, is intended to be lighter than the head weight of the driver that has become familiar to the user, but heavier than configuration A. Thus, in one embodiment the weight of configuration C is approximately 5-14% less than the head weight of the driver that has become familiar to the user. In this configuration the load is reduced and the golfers swing speed should increase in proportion to the % reduction in mass; specifically, in one embodiment the practice swing speed should increase over the user's original swing speed (using their driver) according to the following:
(a) % increase of new configuration C swing speed >0.95 times the % of mass reduction
(b) % increase of new configuration C swing speed <1.75 times the % of mass reduction Therefore, if configuration C is 10% less, then the practice swing speed associated with this configuration should be 9.5-17.5% higher than the original swing speed.
The total system weight of swing speed trainer (50) includes the sum of the individual weights of the head (100), sleeve (200), retainer (300), and all of the weight (410, 420, 430, 440, and/or 450) mounted on the head (100). In one embodiment the swing speed trainer (50) is a kit and includes at least 3 weights that may be interchangeably placed on, or taken off, the head (100) to achieve the weight ranges illustrated in Table 1 for embodiment “a” of both configuration A and configuration B, while in a further embodiment the ranges are narrowed in embodiment “b” of both configuration A and configuration B, in yet another embodiment the ranges are further narrowed in embodiment “c” of both configuration A and configuration B, while a final embodiment narrows the ranges even further in embodiment “d” of both configuration A and configuration B.
In another embodiment the swing speed trainer (50) is a kit and includes at least 4 weights that may be interchangeably placed on, or taken off, the head (100) to also achieve the weight ranges illustrated in Table 1 for embodiment “a” of configuration C, while in a further embodiment the ranges are narrowed in embodiment “b” of configuration C, in yet another embodiment the ranges are further narrowed in embodiment “c” of configuration C, while a final embodiment narrows the ranges even further in embodiment “d” of configuration C.
While the above disclosure was associated with the “driver” row of Table 1, it is not necessary to repeat the analogous disclosure associated with the other rows of Table 1 directed to 3-wood, 5-wood, and 3-hybrid. As previously noted, swing speed training is generally associated with the goal of increasing the length of tee shots, the same concept, disclosure, and procedure applies to the other clubs because a golfer may want to increase the distance associated with one of these other clubs in an effort to achieve desirable gapping distances among the clubs throughout the set.
The above disclosure mentions at least 3 weights in a kit or system achieve the desired ranges of configuration A and B, and at least 4 weights achieve the desired ranges of configuration C, more weights are often preferred and provide significantly greater fine tuning of the mass associated with the desired total system weight of swing speed trainer (50). Therefore, one embodiment includes at least 5 weights, and in a further embodiment all 5 weights are different. Another embodiment includes at least 6 weights, which in a further embodiment includes at least 3 different weights. Likewise for embodiments including 7 weights, 8 weights, 9 weights, and even 10 weights, as illustrated in
Table 2 shows embodiments utilizing weights in which each weight has a unique mass, in other words none of the weights have the same mass as another weight in the kit or system, and the combination is capable of achieving the previously discussed configuration A and B utilizing 3, or more, weights, and also achieves configuration C with 4, or more, weights. Table 3 shows embodiments utilizing weights in which each weight is part of a matching pair of identical weights, and a combination is capable of achieving the previously discussed configuration A and B utilizing 2, or more, pairs of weights, and also achieves configuration C with 3, or more, pairs of weights.
The golf swing speed trainer (50) is configured such that no combination of the weights available in the kit can produce an Izz greater than about 590 kg-mm2. The Izz of configuration B is no more than 30% greater than the Izz of configuration A, and no more than 25% in another embodiment, and no more than 20% in still a further embodiment, and no more than 15% in a final embodiment. Similarly, the Izz of configuration C is no more than 20% greater than the Izz of configuration A, and no more than 15% in another embodiment, and no more than 10% in still a further embodiment, and no more than 5% in a final embodiment.
Now examining the embodiment of Example 1 from Table 2 for golf swing trainers having single weights, the head (100) has a weight that ranges from 45-185 grams, the sleeve (200) has a weight that ranges from 4-50 grams, and the retainer (300) has a weight that ranges from 0.5-5 grams. The first weight (410) has a weight range from 30-60 grams, the second weight (420) has a weight range from 22-42 grams, the third weight (430) has a weight range from 14-30 grams, the fourth weight (440) has a weight range from 6-20 grams, and the fifth weight (450) has a weight range from 2-10 grams. In other words for the embodiment in Example 1, the golf swing speed trainer (50) has a 123.5 gram minimum weight, and a 402 gram maximum weight if all weights were utilized, however the ranges of configuration A and B from Table 1 may be achieved without the need to utilize each of the weights of Table 2. The ranges just disclosed are further narrowed in additional embodiments presented in Table 2 as example 2, example 3, and example 4, which need no further explanation.
As one can see from the embodiment of Example 1 from Table 3 for golf swing trainers having paired weights, the head (100) has a weight that ranges from 45-185 grams, the sleeve (200) has a weight that ranges from 4-50 grams, the retainer (300) has a weight that ranges 0.5-5 grams, the first weight (410) has a weight range from 15-30 grams, the second weight (420) has a weight range from 11-21 grams, the third weight (430) has a weight range from 7-15 grams, the fourth weight (440) has a weight range from 3-10 grams, and the fifth weight (450) has a weight range from 1-5 grams. In other words for the embodiment in Example 1, the golf swing speed trainer (50) has a 123.5 gram minimum weight, and a 402 gram maximum weight if all weights were utilized, however the ranges of configuration A and B from Table 1 may be achieved without the need to utilize each of the weights of Table 3. The ranges just disclosed are further narrowed in additional embodiments presented in Table 3 as example 2, example 3, and example 4, which need no further explanation.
In a still further embodiment, the mass of the head (100) is greater than the mass of the sleeve (200), which is greater than the mass of the retainer (300). Additionally, in another embodiment the mass of the head (100) is greater than the sum of the weights that may be attached to the head (100). In yet a further embodiment the mass of the head (100) is 35-75% of the total system weight of swing speed trainer (50), and at least 45% in another embodiment, and at least 55% in yet a further embodiment. The mass of the sleeve (200) is less than 25% of the total system weight of swing speed trainer (50) in one embodiment, and less than 15% in another embodiment, and no more than 10% in still a further embodiment.
Conventional speed training devices use very high density materials to keep the size as small as possible. However, this means that such a high density speed training device is significantly smaller in volume than a modern driver club head, which are generally 420-460 cc. The impact of this is that such a high density speed training device does not present an aerodynamic drag profile that golfers are accustomed to and associated with the modern golf club head. Therefore, in one embodiment the swing speed trainer (50) utilizes materials that are significantly less dense than would be logical for such an application. In fact, in one embodiment the density of the head (100) is no more than 5 g/cc, while in an even further embodiment the density of the head (100) is no more than 3 g/cc. In fact, in such embodiments the head (100) may be formed of aluminum alloy, magnesium alloy, titanium alloy, or other non-metallic lightweight materials.
This is also true with respect to the actual weights (410, 420, 430, 440, 450), and accordingly in one embodiment the density of any one, or all of, the weights (410, 420, 430, 440, 450) is less than 8 g/cc, and less than 5 g/cc in another embodiment, and less than 3 g/cc in yet a further embodiment, and less than 2 g/cc in yet another embodiment, and less than 1.25 g/cc in a final embodiment. Using such low density materials for the weights is contrary to conventional thinking, as a very large volume must be used to achieve the target mass, which helps mimic the aerodynamic drag characteristics of a modern driver golf club head. In fact, in one embodiment the density of at least one of the weights has the lowest density of the head (100), sleeve (200), and retainer (300). In one embodiment the density of the sleeve (200) is no more than 8 g/cc, and no more than 6 g/cc in another embodiment, and no more than 4 g/cc in a further embodiment, and no more than 2 g/cc in a final embodiment. The retainer (300) has the highest density of the components of the swing speed trainer (50) in an embodiment. In an embodiment at least one of the weights is primarily composed of non-metallic material, and in a further embodiment the non-metallic material is compressible, and elastic in still a further embodiment. Such embodiments reduce the likelihood of rattling due to weight separation and contact during use.
In some embodiments, the weights of the weighting system (400) have a non-symmetric shape about the center of the weight inner diameter (402), as seen in
c show embodiments wherein the weights of the weighting system (400) are not symmetrical.
In the most basic embodiments such as that in
These figures also illustrate the value of having an asymmetric support plate (140) and asymmetric weights. In one such embodiment the asymmetric support plate (140) has a plate long flange length (149A) and a plate short flange length (149B), wherein the plate long flange length (149A) is at least twice the plate short flange length (149B). The difference between the plate long flange length (149A) and plate short flange length (149B) is at least 5 mm, and at least 10 mm in another embodiment, and at least 15 mm in still a further embodiment. The retainer recess depth (152) is at least 20% of the spindle bore depth (132), and at least 40% in another embodiment, and at least 60% in still a further embodiment. However, another series of embodiments recognizes the retainer recess depth (152) is no more than 120% of the spindle bore depth (132), and no more than 100% in another embodiment, and no more than 80% in still a further embodiment.
The system CG to sleeve bore flange distance (62), shown in
In some embodiments, such as those of
Just as the system CG to sleeve bore flange distance (62) plays a significant role in mimicking the CG location of an actual club head, so too is the system CG from central axis dimension (66), seen in
Additional embodiments also take into consideration (a) the “depth of gravity center” seen in
As for repeatably positioning and securing the head (100) to the shaft sleeve (700), in one embodiment the sleeve (200) is specifically configured to cooperate with the shaft sleeve (700), essentially mimicking the cooperating structure and surfaced found in the bore of the associated golf club head. In other words, in this embodiment the sleeve (200) is designed to be specific to a golf club head manufacturer and cooperate with their proprietary shaft sleeves (700). A very basic example is found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,530,900, whereby the sleeve (200) of the present invention may be formed to contain the features of the tube, element 44 of the '900 patent, so that it prevents relative rotation of the shaft sleeve (700) and the sleeve (200), and then the exterior surface of the sleeve (200) includes a sleeve cooperating structure to engage a spindle cooperating structure, formed in the spindle bore (130) or the opening to the spindle bore (130), and may contain indicia to indicate a “home” position, which would be the equivalent to the standard loft and lie position of the club head. Examples of spindle cooperating structures include, but are not limited to, those found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,096,895, 9,174,097, 7,344,449, 7,566,279, 9,849,350, 2008/0254909, 7,931,542, 7,997,997, 7,980,959, 7,530,900, 9,320,947, 8,353,781, 7,736,243, 9,320,947, 7,955,182, 8,235,836, 9,782,641, 8,747,248, 9,144,720, 9,908,010, 9,901,787, 8,235,835, 8,616,995, 9,868,035, 9,868,035, as well as universal systems intended to cooperate with the shaft sleeves (700) of numerous different manufacturers such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,046,899, and any of their related family members, all of which are incorporated by reference herein, and any of the features may be incorporated into the present sleeve (200). Specifically, in one embodiment at least a portion of the sleeve bore (210) has a non-circular cross-sectional shape, when the cross-section is taken in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the sleeve bore (210).
In the preceding paragraph the sleeve (200) was essentially specific to the shaft sleeve (700) of a particular club head manufacturer, or alternatively included at least one non-rotational feature associated with the shaft sleeve (700) design of multiple manufacturers so it could accommodate more than a single manufacturer, or alternatively included multiple non-rotational features (internally and, in some embodiments, along the entry edge of the spindle bore (130)) to be “universal” an accommodate at least 3 of the shaft sleeves associated with the top 10 selling golf clubs for a particular calendar year. However, an alternative embodiment eliminates the sleeve (200) altogether and the disclosed non-rotation features are formed in the spindle (110). These embodiments highlight the benefits associated with the previously disclosed sleeve (200) that is formed of a material having elastic properties and thereby accepting the shapes of multiple shaft sleeves (700) of different manufacturers. In fact, in one embodiment the kit may include at least two sleeves (200) each having different sleeve bore (210) attributes. In one embodiment a sleeve bore proximal diameter (214) of a second sleeve (200) is at least 10% larger than a sleeve bore proximal diameter (214) of a first sleeve (200). In another embodiment at least a portion of a first sleeve bore (210) has a first cross sectional shape that is different from a second cross sectional shape associated with a portion of a second sleeve bore (210).
In a further embodiment the swing speed trainer (50) includes an app for mobile devices, or a web interface, that allows the user to select the manufacturer and model of their golf club head from a list of options, the app or interface accesses a file containing the appropriate combination of the weighting system (400) including the quantity, size, and placement of the weights needed to achieve a location of the system center of gravity (60) relative to the shaft sleeve distal side (720), or other predefined reference frame, that is no more than ½ from a center of gravity of the selected golf club head relative to the same predefined reference frame. Therefore, the user is instructed on the appropriate combination and orientation to best mimic the user's golf club head. In a further embodiment the ½″ is reduced to ¼″, and in yet another embodiment it is further reduced to ⅛″. A further embodiment incorporates a printed table, or series of tables, to allow a user to look-up the relevant combination.
As seen in
Numerous alterations, modifications, and variations of the preferred embodiments disclosed herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art and they are all anticipated and contemplated to be within the spirit and scope of the instant invention. For example, although specific embodiments have been described in detail, those with skill in the art will understand that the preceding embodiments and variations can be modified to incorporate various types of substitute and or additional or alternative materials, relative arrangement of elements, and dimensional configurations. Accordingly, even though only few variations of the present invention are described herein, it is to be understood that the practice of such additional modifications and variations and the equivalents thereof, are within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or acts for performing the functions in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/118,686, filed on Dec. 11, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/947,095, filed on Dec. 12, 2019, all of which are incorporated by reference as if completely written herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1167387 | Daniel | Jan 1916 | A |
| 2002108 | Child | May 1935 | A |
| 2715026 | Cadman | Aug 1955 | A |
| 2950919 | Cadman | Aug 1960 | A |
| 3136546 | Connolly | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3190651 | Thomas | Jun 1965 | A |
| 3351346 | Strahan | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3414260 | Gust | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3606327 | Gorman | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3677498 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3743297 | Dennis | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3759527 | Witherspoon | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3817534 | Carlino | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3874660 | Brethen | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4052075 | Daly | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4195842 | Coleman | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4444396 | Wendt | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4602788 | Wendt | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4809975 | Lee | Mar 1989 | A |
| 5121925 | Blundo | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5209481 | DeBack | May 1993 | A |
| 5215307 | Huffman | Jun 1993 | A |
| 7344449 | Hocknell et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7530900 | Holt et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7557286 | Capotosto | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7566279 | Nakashima | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7736243 | Sanchez et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7931542 | Kusumoto | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7955182 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7980959 | Morris et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7997997 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8046899 | Burch | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8096895 | Hocknell et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8235835 | Soracco | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8235836 | Soracco et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8353781 | DeShiell et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8491422 | Deschesnes et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8529365 | Davis | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8540584 | Sorenson | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8616995 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8747248 | Harvell et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 9144720 | Vrska et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9174097 | Dacey et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9320947 | Yamamoto | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9782641 | Boggs et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9844707 | Davis | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9849350 | Dacey et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9868035 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9895570 | Shah | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9901787 | Boggs et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9908010 | Boggs et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 10213665 | Day et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10994184 | Snyder | May 2021 | B1 |
| 20040009826 | Aisenberg | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20050261070 | Jeong | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060142095 | Glickman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154740 | Liu | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070129164 | Shimazaki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298904 | Dworzan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080202317 | Capotosto | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254909 | Callinan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20120233838 | Swist | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20150005090 | Parker | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150005091 | Phillips | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20170252627 | Rosberger et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170291090 | Wang | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20210154551 | Christiansen | May 2021 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Diamond Tour Golf website; Accelerator Swing Speed Training System; https://www.diamondtour.com/accelerator-swing-speed-training-system.html, Oct. 28, 2019. |
| Kickstarter; Unlocked Golf; Swing Speed Trainer & Tripod by Patrick Rients; https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/hitbombs/unlocked-golf-swing-speed-trainer-and-tripod?ref=discovery&term=unlocked%20golf, Oct. 28, 2019. |
| Super Speed Golf trainer instruction manual. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210245029 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62947095 | Dec 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17118686 | Dec 2020 | US |
| Child | 17243644 | US |
