The present invention relates to a device that controls elevator car speeds. More particularly, the invention relates to a centrifugally actuated governor.
A common challenge in elevator design is engineering safety systems to prevent or react to elevator malfunction. One such safety system is the speed governor. Elevator speed governors are designed to prevent elevator cars from exceeding a set speed limit. The governor is a component in an automated safety system, which is actuated when the elevator car exceeds a set speed and either signals a control system to stop the car or directly engages safeties to stop the car. One commonly known governor is a centrifugally actuated governor.
A common design of centrifugal governors used in elevator systems employs two masses, sometimes referred to as flyweights, connected kinematically in an opposing configuration by links and pinned to a tripping sheave rotating about a common axis. These interconnected parts create a governor mechanism, which rotates at an angular velocity common with the angular velocity of the sheave. The angular velocity of the rotating masses results in a centrifugal force acting to propel the masses away from the sheave axis of rotation. The movement of the masses is essentially a cantilevering motion radially outward about their pinned attachments to the sheave. A coupler prevents the radial outward movement of the masses up to a set elevator car speed. The coupler commonly includes a spring connected between the sheave and one of the masses, which resists the centrifugal force generated by the angular velocity of the rotating sheave up to a set speed. When the elevator car meets or exceeds a set speed limit, sometimes referred to as an overspeed condition, the governor is actuated. In the overspeed condition, the force of the governor coupler, for example the spring coupler, is overcome by the centrifugal force acting on the masses. The two masses move radially outward and commonly engage a sensor, which in turn signals safeties in the elevator system to slow or stop the elevator car.
There are several limitations to prior centrifugal governor designs. The governor mechanism including only two cantilevering masses leaves circumferential dead spaces in which the masses may not immediately engage the sensor after the governor is actuated, which in turn may delay the engagement of elevator safeties. The dead spaces inherent in prior centrifugal governor mechanisms create the risk of large elevator car speed increases during the period after the car reaches an overspeed condition and before safeties are engaged to slow or stop the car. The risk of large elevator car speed increments caused by the dead spaces in prior governor mechanisms creates several problems in elevator car systems. For example, large car speed increments may increase the risk of damage to system components, such as guide rails or active components of elevator safeties. Additionally, large car speed increments may cause back-up safety components to be actuated, which in some cases may make passenger rescue more time consuming and complicated.
In light of the foregoing, the present invention aims to resolve one or more of the aforementioned issues that afflict conventional governors.
The present invention includes a mechanism for use in an elevator governor assembly including a ground configured to rotate about a ground axis, three or more circumferentially overlapping cams each pivotally attached to the ground at one of three or more ground pivot points radially spaced from the ground axis, and a plurality of links pivotally attaching the three or more cams to one another at a plurality of link pivot points. The circumferentially overlapping cams form a substantially contiguous circular ring about the ground axis. The interconnection of the ground, the cams, and the links form a generally circular mechanism.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not restrictive of the invention as claimed.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description, appended claims, and the accompanying exemplary embodiments shown in the drawings, which are hereafter briefly described.
Efforts have been made throughout the drawings to use the same or similar reference numerals for the same or like components.
In the elevator system 10 as shown in
In
The governor 20 also includes the coupler 38 between the mass support 34c and the tripping sheave 18. The coupler 38 provides a connection between the mass support 34c and the tripping sheave 18, which connection resists the centrifugal force created by the rotation of the sheave 18. As the sheave 18 rotates at angular velocities within a defined range, the mass support 34c, and thereby the two other interconnected mass supports 34a, 34b, does not substantially move radially outward about its pivot point 40c, and the governor 20 rotates with the sheave 18 without engaging the sensor 28.
The governor 20 may be configured to be actuated when the connection provided by the coupler 38 is overcome at a set angular velocity of the sheave 18, as shown in
Governors according to the present invention may also include a releasable non-elastic coupler, such as a permanent magnet coupler, for controlling actuation of the governor. An example of such an alternate embodiment governor 20′ is shown in
The governor 20′ also includes a releasable non-elastic coupler 38′ between one of the mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c and the sheave 18, or between two of the mass supports, for example between mass supports 34a and 34b. In this embodiment, the releasable non-elastic coupler 38′ is a permanent magnetic, which includes a first element 90 and a second element 92. The first element 90 may be a permanent magnet attached to the second mass support 34b. Similarly, the second element 92 may be a ferromagnetic material attached to the first mass support 34a. In such an embodiment, connector 38′ may provide a magnetic connection between first and second mass supports 34a and 34b, which resists the centrifugal force created by the rotation of the sheave (not shown). As the sheave rotates at angular velocities within a defined range, the mass supports 34a, 34b remain magnetically connected, and the governor 20′ rotates with the sheave 18 without engaging the sensor 28. The governor 20′ is actuated when the magnetic connection provided by coupler 38′ is overcome at a set angular velocity of the sheave 18, as the centrifugal force on masses 32a, 32b, and 32c exceeds the force created by the magnetic connection.
Connecting the masses 32a, 32b, 32c, supports 34a, 34b, 34c, and links 36a, 36b, 36c to form the generally circular governor mechanism 42 prescribes the motion of the mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c such that when in the non-actuated state, the mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c are radially spaced about the sheave axis of rotation 30 and, when actuated, the mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c move radially outward as a function of angular velocity to substantially create the circumference of a generally circular shape until the outer arcuate edges of the mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c engage the sensor 28. Because the mechanism 42 forms a substantially contiguous circle at the outer edges of mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c and provides the controlled motion previously described, once the governor 20, 20′ is actuated it will almost immediately engage the sensor 28 regardless of the angular position of the mechanism 42 about the sheave axis of rotation 30. In other words, the governor 20, 20′ greatly reduces the dead spaces associated with conventional governors.
The manufacturing costs of the governors 20 and 20′ shown in
The masses 32a, 32b, 32c, supports 34a, 34b, 34c, and links 36a, 36b, 36c can be constructed using manufacturing techniques well known to those ordinarily skilled in the art. For example, the masses 32a, 32b, 32c can be constructed from a variety of cast metal or stamped sheet metal materials. By way of another example, the mass supports 34a, 34b, 34c and the links 36a, 36b, 36c can be constructed from sheet metal, plastic, or a combination of metal and plastic and manufactured by stamping, casting, or injection molding.
Embodiments of the present invention eliminate many of the disadvantages of prior centrifugally actuated governors. Connecting the masses, mass supports, and links to form a governor mechanism according to the present invention prescribes the motion of the mass supports such that they form an adjustable generally circular ring that increases in diameter as a function of angular velocity until the outer arcuate edges of the mass supports engage a safety sensor. Because the mechanism forms a substantially contiguous circle at the outer edges of the mass supports and provides the controlled motion previously described, once the governor is actuated it will almost immediately engage the sensor regardless of the angular position of the mechanism about the sheave axis of rotation. In other words, governors according to the present invention are configured to remove dead spaces, which may otherwise delay signaling elevator safeties to slow or stop the elevator car. The removal of the dead spaces from centrifugal governors according to the present invention reduces the risk of large elevator car speed increases during the period after the car reaches an overspeed condition and before elevator safeties are engaged to slow or stop the car. Reducing the risk of large elevator car speed increments created by the dead spaces in prior governor mechanisms increases the overall safety of elevator car systems by, for example, reducing the risk of damage to system components.
The aforementioned discussion is intended to be merely illustrative of the present invention and should not be construed as limiting the appended claims to any particular embodiment or group of embodiments. For example, embodiments of governors according to the present invention may include more than three mass supports and masses arranged in a circumferentially overlapping configuration about the sheave axis of rotation. Thus, while the present invention has been described in particular detail with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof, it should also be appreciated that numerous modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader and intended scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow.
The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative manner and are not intended to limit the scope of the appended claims. In light of the foregoing disclosure of the present invention, one versed in the art would appreciate that there may be other embodiments and modifications within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, all modifications attainable by one versed in the art from the present disclosure within the scope of the present invention are to be included as further embodiments of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is to be defined as set forth in the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2007/003299 | 4/13/2007 | WO | 00 | 9/8/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/125133 | 10/23/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2072852 | Batten et al. | Mar 1937 | A |
2588482 | Chapman | Mar 1952 | A |
2673633 | Miller et al. | Mar 1954 | A |
2957565 | Brueder | Oct 1960 | A |
3024886 | Peras | Mar 1962 | A |
3208571 | Bochory | Sep 1965 | A |
3738456 | Russell et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
4246523 | Nagai | Jan 1981 | A |
5492200 | Korhonen | Feb 1996 | A |
20040104096 | Genise | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060003866 | Unno et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070275811 | Starik | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20110272217 | Niikawa | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130098711 | Aguado et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130306409 | Dube | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
934330 | Oct 1955 | DE |
2 251 124 | May 1973 | DE |
195 36 995 | Apr 1997 | DE |
226932 | Jan 1925 | GB |
719486 | Dec 1954 | GB |
1042553 | Jul 1964 | GB |
38-24341 | Nov 1938 | JP |
48-53454 | Jul 1973 | JP |
50-152456 | Dec 1975 | JP |
6408173 | Feb 1965 | NL |
0130680 | May 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
The Japanese Office Action Translation dated Mar. 27, 2012 for the Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-502423. |
International Search Report—EP20071003299—Dated Jul. 11, 2007—10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100059319 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |