The present disclosure relates generally to handheld electronic devices equipped with digital cameras and, in particular, to geotagging techniques for such devices.
Some of the new generation of handheld electronic devices include both a camera and a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver chipset. Examples of these handheld electronic devices include GPS-enabled wireless communications devices, PDA Pocket PCs or tablets, GPS-enabled camera-phones or smart phones, and GPS-enabled cameras. These devices can be made “location-aware” by virtue of a GPS receiver that is either embedded as a GPS chipset or connected externally, e.g. a Bluetooth™-enabled GPS puck.
The combination of GPS and camera features enables “geotagging” {or “geocoding”) of digital photographs, i.e. tagging digital photos with geographical information indicative of the location at which the photo was taken. For example, the geotagging may involve appending coordinates of longitude and latitude to a metadata tag, e.g. an Exchangeable Image File Format (EXIF) tag, that is associated with the digital photo.
Conventionally, for geotagging to be accurate and meaningful, the GPS receiver should be locked at the time the photo is taken, i.e. the GPS receiver must have acquired a position fix, so that the current position data (e.g. position coordinates) can be written to the metadata tag associated with the digital photo.
As is known in the art, a GPS lock or position fix is acquired by synchronizing with at least four GPS satellite vehicles in orbit. The time required to compute the location on a new synchronization is known as the time-to-first-fix (TTFF). Unfortunately, the TTFF can be frustratingly long for various reasons, including poor sky access (e.g. the urban canyon effect or dense overhead foliage) or out-of-date almanac or ephemeris data on start-up.
In order to be able to find the satellites initially, a GPS receiver normally requires an almanac of satellite location data that is imprecise but valid for several months. If a full reset occurs, then downloading the full almanac takes 12.5 minutes, with a maximum wait of 25 minutes. The almanac serves as a rough approximation of satellite location. To acquire a precise fix, the device must also obtain ephemeris data from each satellite itself which consists of very precise orbital and clock correction data, at a slow 50 bytes per second for a total of 12 seconds for ephemeris and 6 seconds for clock corrections. When the device retrieves this data directly from a satellite broadcast, it is operating in autonomous or standalone GPS mode, the most common mode of operation. The ephemeris data is cached by the receiver, but it becomes stale and unusable within 3 to 4 hours due to satellite drift due to various sources of error. If the wireless handheld device loses synchronization because, for example, the user enters a building or subway and the ephemeris becomes stale, then a warm or cold start condition occurs and new ephemeris must be downloaded again through a full sky search.
In addition to the latency involved in the data download, obstructions in the signal path can further prolong the TTFF. Satellites broadcast their ephemeris every 30 seconds, 5 times per window. If the signal is interrupted, the receiver must wait for another cycle. Obtaining a fix can easily take several minutes or much longer if the user is travelling through an urban canyon or dense foliage. On a hot start, where current ephemeris data is still available, the time required to obtain a fix is reduced to seconds. However, on a warm start, if a user turns on the handheld device or emerges from a building so that the receiver has no valid ephemeris data in memory, then the user may typically need to wait a few minutes before a fix is established. Of course, if both the almanac and ephemeris is out-dated, i.e. a cold start, then the TTFF can be frustratingly long.
These TTFF delays preclude the immediate geotagging of photos. If the user wishes to take a geotagged photo, the camera either remains locked (“frozen’) until the GPS position fix is obtained, or the photo is taken without GPS lock, in which case the photo cannot be geotagged at that point because a GPS fix is unavailable. Thus, if, after the photo is taken, the user moves substantially away from the geographical location where the photo was taken, then any subsequent GPS position fix is potentially of limited positional accuracy in attempting to retroactively geotag the photograph.
Further features and advantages of the present technology will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
The present technology provides, in general, a handheld electronic device, such as, for example, a GPS-enabled wireless communications device with an embedded camera, a GPS-enabled camera-phone or a GPS-enabled digital camera, that is configured to pre-acquire a GPS position fix for geotagging photos. Pre-acquisition of a GPS position fix involves initiating acquisition of the GPS position fix in anticipation of the taking of a photo with the camera-enabled device so that geotagging of the photo can proceed expeditiously. In particular implementations, the device is configured to determine whether ephemeris data needs to be obtained for geotagging digital photos taken with the onboard camera of the device. By monitoring user activity with respect to the camera, such as activation of the camera by a user of the device, the device can begin pre-acquisition of a GPS position fix by obtaining any needed ephemeris data before the photograph is actually taken. This GPS pre-acquisition improves the likelihood that a position fix (GPS lock) is achieved by the time the photo is taken (to enable immediate geotagging of the digital photo). Alternatively, the photo can be geotagged retroactively by appending the GPS-determined current location to the metadata tag associated with the digital photo, An optional acquisition status indicator can be displayed on a user interface of the device to indicate that a position fix is being obtained, to indicate that accurate geotagging is being performed, or alternatively to warn the user that geotagging will be inaccurate or impossible because the time elapsed between the taking of the picture and the acquisition of the GPS position fix is too long.
Thus, a main aspect of the present technology is a method of geotagging using a handheld electronic device, the method comprising monitoring user activity with respect to a digital camera on the device, prior to the digital camera taking a digital photograph, initiating acquisition of current position data for a current position of the device, and geotagging the digital photograph with the current position data.
In one implementation of this aspect of the technology, the method involves obtaining ephemeris data for a GPS-enabled handheld electronic device. This particular implementation of the method includes steps of monitoring user activity with respect to a digital camera on the device, determining whether ephemeris data is needed for acquiring a GPS position fix, obtaining the ephemeris data in order to acquire the GPS position fix representative of a current location of the device, and geotagging a digital photo taken by the digital camera with the current location of the device.
Another main aspect of the present technology is a computer readable medium that includes code that causes the device to perform the foregoing method when the code on the computer readable medium is loaded into memory and executed on a processor of a handheld electronic device.
Yet another main aspect of the present technology is a handheld electronic device having a receiver for obtaining current position data for a current position of the device from signals received from a satellite-based navigation-signal broadcast system, a digital camera for taking a digital photograph, and a memory coupled to a processor that is configured to monitor user activity with respect to the digital camera, to cause the receiver to initiate acquisition the current position data prior to the digital camera taking the digital photograph, and to geotag the digital photograph using the current position data.
In one implementation of this aspect of the technology, the device has a GPS receiver or receiving GPS radio signals from orbiting GPS satellites and for further receiving ephemeris data for the GPS satellites, a camera for taking a digital photo, and a processor coupled to memory for monitoring user activity with respect to the camera and for determining whether ephemeris data needs to be obtained for geotagging the digital photo based on a GPS position fix acquired for a current location.
The details and particulars of these aspects of the technology will now be described below, by way of example, with reference to the attached drawings.
For the purposes of this specification, the expression “handheld electronic device” is meant to encompass a broad range of portable or mobile devices such as wireless communications devices, PDA Pocket PCs or tablets equipped with GPS, GPS-enabled camera-phones or smart phones, GPS-enabled cameras, etc. These devices can be made “location-aware” by virtue of a GPS receiver that is either embedded as a GPS chipset or connected externally, e.g. a Bluetooth™-enabled GPS puck.
Although the present disclosure refers to expressly to the “Global Positioning System”, it should be understood that this term and its abbreviation “GPS” are being used expansively to include any satellite-based navigation-signal broadcast system, and would therefore include other systems used around the world including the Beidou (COMPASS) system being developed by China, the multi-national Galileo system being developed by the European Union, in collaboration with China, Israel, India, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and South Korea, Russia's GLONASS system, India's proposed Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS), and Japan's proposed QZSS regional system.
As depicted in
If, at optional step 14, it is determined that a position fix is currently available, then operations proceed to step 20 wherein the device enables the user to take the photo. Thereafter, at step 22, the photo is geotagged by writing position data into the metadata tag associated with the photo, as will be elaborated below. On the other hand, if at step 14, a determination is made that the GPS receiver does not have a current position fix, e.g. that new ephemeris data is required in order to acquire a GPS fix, then the device optionally determines at step 16 whether it should wait for a GPS position fix to be acquired or whether it should proceed immediately to step 20 to enable the digital photo to be taken right away. Alternatively, instead of step 16, the device could immediately begin the process of acquiring the GPS fix (and optionally obtaining the ephemeris data, if needed, in order to acquire the GPS position fix) without making any explicit inquiry about the availability of a current GPS position fix. If, at step 16, a decision is made to await acquisition of the GPS position fix, the device then acquires the position fix at step 18, optionally by first obtaining any needed ephemeris data. Once the GPS position fix is acquired at step 18, operations proceed to step 20 at which point the device can take the digital photo and then, at step 22, geotag the digital photo taken by the digital camera with the current location of the device. In other words, as depicted in
Alternatively, instead of writing the location data to the metadata tag, such as an EXIF tag, the device can create a separate geotag file that stores all the geographical data and cross-references each set of geographical data with each of the digital photos stored in memory on the device. In other words, a dedicated geotag file would store each digital photo file name (e.g. Picture0001.jpg) with a set of GPS coordinates or other location data (e.g. Lat=xx.xx.xx, Lon=xx.xx.xx). Alternatively, two separate files could be used with an index, code or other means to associate the photo files with each set of position data (stored in a separate position data file).
The foregoing method steps can be implemented as coded instructions in a computer program product. In other words, the computes program product is a computer-readable medium upon which software code is recorded to perform the foregoing steps when the computer program product is loaded into memory and executed on the microprocessor of the handheld electronic device.
The foregoing method can also be implemented on one of the example networks shown in
The ephemeris data could be transferred to the handhelds in a number of standard ways, e.g. by downloading the data file using TCP/IP. For example, with support from the standards body, SUPL (Secure User Plane Location architecture) could allow extended ephemeris to be transferred directly from a location server, called Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC), to the mobile handset client using secure end-to-end IP connectivity. Providing timely ephemeris updates (“assistance data”) thus helps to efficiently overcome the performance limitations of conventional GPS, thus enhancing GPS sensitivity while enabling operation under difficult signal conditions, such as urban canyons or under dense foliage.
Although assistance data is very useful, it should be appreciated that the present technology can be implemented without any A-GPS assistance data. In other words, standalone GPS can be used to geotag photographs using the pre-acquisition or anticipatory techniques described herein without recourse to A-GPS.
As will be readily appreciated, a user of this device 100 can activate the camera by manipulating the keyboard 116 or the thumbwheel/trackball 114 to launch a camera application. Alternatively, the wireless handheld device may have a dedicated button to activate the camera. Once the camera is turned on, the viewfinder is presented on the LCD display 112 as part of a camera user interface. An example of a camera user interface is illustrated in
So if the user moves away from the spot where the quick snap was taken, the resultant positional error is minimized.
As further depicted in the particular implementation presented in
As shown in
In normal operation of this particular implementation of the technology, ephemeris data is downloaded pre-emptively based on any camera-related user activity, such as launching the camera application. Launching the camera application 160 would, for example, trigger a request into the API 152 (e.g. Java JSR 179) for GPS data. This request would be logged by the user activity monitoring application 170. The API 152 preferably resides between the operating system 150 and the camera application 160 so that all GPS requests go through this API. All location requests from the camera application 160 to the API 152 go to the GPS driver 154 via the OS 150, as shown in
Likewise, if a camera application is launched, or used repeatedly over a given period of time, the user activity monitoring application 170 will monitor the usage of the camera application 160 either directly or (indirectly) by the requests that the camera application 160 makes through the API 152 to the GPS driver 154 for GPS data. In other words, logging/monitoring requests through the API 152 for the GPS driver to obtain GPS fixes from the GPS chipset 110 provides an indication of user activity and allows the user activity monitoring application 170 to identify usage patterns for the camera application or for GPS requests in general.
For example, the user activity monitoring application 170 may compile behavioral data on the usage patterns of the camera. An algorithm (or even an artificial intelligence module) integrated within the monitoring application 170 could then attempt to develop correlations between camera usage (pictures taken) and date, time, and location parameters.
For example, analysis of historical usage of the camera might reveal that whenever the location of the device changes radically to a location where the user has never roamed to before, the user tends to take a photograph upon turning on the device (e-g. stepping off a plane on a vacation in a new country) but that this only occurs if the time of day is during daylight hours. As another example, the device might further observe that upon radically changing global locations, there is a delay (corresponding to arrival at the airport) where no pictures are taken, but that upon moving again to another location (e.g. beyond the airport) the picture-taking activity typically commences. This would provide a potential cue to the device to check its ephemeris and obtain a GPS fix.
As yet another example, the device might observe that photographs are often taken on Christmas Day, but always at the user's home address. Therefore, the device might deduce that while these are “family photo ops”, ephemeris data is unnecessary because the user will probably not be concerned about geotagging photos taken in his own home.
The User Activity Monitoring Application 170 can also, in a variant on this implementation, extract information from a calendaring application to keyword search for special events that might be “photo ops” requiring geotagging, such as “graduation”, “baptism”, “wedding”, “family picnic”, “trip”, “holiday”, “tour”, “vacation”, etc. In some of these instances, geotagging may or may not be appropriate or desirable, and the device's artificial intelligence can attempt to guess whether ephemeris should be obtained preemptively.
This new technology has been described in terms of specific implementations and configurations which are intended to be exemplary only. The scope of the exclusive right sought by the Applicant is therefore intended to be limited solely by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/930,589 filed Jun. 28, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/429,583 filed Mar. 26, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,477,066), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/914,189 filed Oct. 28, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,144,055), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/020,714 filed Jan. 28, 2008 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,847,729).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6321158 | DeLorme | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6434484 | Lee | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6995792 | Ogura | Feb 2006 | B1 |
20040130626 | Ouchi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174434 | Walker | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050210110 | Li | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050275726 | Abraham | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007315 | Singh | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060090359 | Bork | May 2006 | A1 |
20060187317 | Montulli | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070168376 | Luitjens | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070211143 | Brodie et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244634 | Koch et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080147730 | Lee | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080218407 | Norda et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080297409 | Klassen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301180 | Klassen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090102713 | Sanchez et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171568 | McQuaide, Jr. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0959418 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1720030 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1840763 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1879373 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2001166366 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2003244709 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2009116795 | May 2009 | JP |
2004059966 | Jul 2004 | WO |
2005001714 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office, Summons to Attend Oral Hearing for Application No. 12170972.9, issued on Mar. 18, 2016. |
European Patent Office, Examination Report for Application No. 12170972.9, issued on Apr. 1, 2015. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action on Application No. 2,651,421, Issued on Apr. 12, 2011. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report on Application No. 08150732.9, Issued on Oct. 9, 2008. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report on Application No. 08152102.3, Issued on Jun. 25, 2008. |
“The Ricoh 500SE GPS-ready Digital Camera-Capture Location Data with Your Images”, http://www.ricohsolutions.com/geo/ , accessed on Oct. 30, 2007. |
Juhong Liu, “Extracting Semantic Location from Outdoor Positioning Systems”, Mobile Data Management, 2006, MDM 2006 7th International Conference, XP010917947, May 10, 2006. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Office Action on Application No. 2,651,421, Issued on Mar. 14, 2012. |
European Patent Office, Office Action on Application No. 08150732.9, Issued on Jun. 7, 2010. |
European Patent Office, Office Action on Application No. 08150732.9, Issued on Nov. 17, 2010. |
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for Application No. 17160948.0, dated Jun. 16, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150061932 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13930589 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 14490004 | US | |
Parent | 13429583 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13930589 | US | |
Parent | 12914189 | Oct 2010 | US |
Child | 13429583 | US | |
Parent | 12020714 | Jan 2008 | US |
Child | 12914189 | US |