This invention relates to an apparatus used in railway grade crossings, specifically an interface pad to cushion the panels between and around the rails against impact and abrasion with the underlying ties and to provide uniform panel support. The invention also relates to simplifying installation of such interface pads in a railway grade crossing.
In a grade crossing (also called a level crossing), gaps in the roadway around the railway tracks are filled in with large panels, which rest on wood or concrete ties and are approximately flush with the railheads. As vehicles pass over the crossing, the panels experience significant loading and will deflect downwardly. If a panel is not resting directly on a tie, which happens in situations where tie dimensions are not uniform, that deflection may push the panel sharply against the top surface of the tie, possibly damaging the panel, the tie or both. Repeated uncushioned impacts can eventually cause failure of the panel or tie.
It is therefore preferable to have a protective cushioning means between the panels and the ties, to act as both a shock absorber and to help absorb normal support surface variations. An interface pad is designed to cushion and support the panels and to compensate for any irregularities in the top surface of the tie that might otherwise provide a point of impact when the panels deflect against the ties as vehicles pass over.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,626,289 to Demers Jr. et al. discloses a grade crossing, and briefly refers to “known” interface pads for use between the tie and the panels, without providing any real details of the pads. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,449,666 to Hales et al. discloses a layer of elastomeric compound to separate the panels of a grade crossing from the ties, to provide flexibility to the panels and allow to adjustment of the height of the panels relative to the rail heads. However, not much more detail about the pad itself is provided.
It is known to simply place an elongated (i.e. covering substantially all of the exposed areas of the tie) interface pad over a tie once the tie is in place under a track. The drawback to this is that it creates an additional step in the installation process, as each pad, known as a conformal pad, must be hand-placed on each tie during installation. Further, because there is no physical connection between the pad and the tie, it is is difficult to ensure that the pads stay in place as the ties are installed under the rails, or as panels are installed on the ties because these situations generally require the ties or panels to be moved sideways, such that the rails or panels slide over the top surface of the ties. These sliding motions will tend to scrape any loose pads off the top of the tie.
These drawbacks have been addressed by creating shaped interface pads that interact with multiple surfaces of the tie, providing an improved fit between the tie and the pad. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,422,478 to Lucas Jr. and Canadian Patent No. 2281110 to Bruyn both show tie pads that are carefully shaped and engineered not only to provide cushioning pockets within the body of the interface pads, but also to fit over the top chamfers of a concrete tie, keeping the pad in place through friction and cooperation with the tie. Similarly, US Pat. App. No. 2007/0200005 to Corbett Jr. et al. describes several means to attach the pads to the tie, such as wrapping around the chamfered edges of the tie, direct attachment to the panels, and physical abutment with rail attachment hardware, ballast or roadway, but does not discuss mechanically fastening the pads to the ties. The main drawback to these shaped interface pads is that they do not address the issues of increased installation time for placing one or more pads on each tie during installation or of potential loss of the unsecured pads during or after installation.
In order to directly deal with this issue, it is known to glue an elongated interface pad, or one or more smaller interface pads, on top of the tie before shipping the tie to the installation site. However, glued-on interface pads are still highly susceptible to displacement during shipping or at any one of several points in the process involved in constructing grade crossings, which wastes money and materials.
More secure methods of connecting interface pads to ties have not gained widespread use, possibly because of the difficulties or costs associated with placing mechanical fasteners, such as bolts, into the top of a concrete tie. Further, simply bolting a flat rubber pad into the top of a tie still may not ensure that the pad stays in place during is installation, as the rubber pad can be torn off over the fastener if it is pulled with sufficient force.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an interface pad, specifically for use at grade crossings that overcomes one or more of the foregoing difficulties.
In particular, it is an object of the invention to provide a pre-attached interface pad for a grade crossing that eliminates the need to ship loose conformal pads to the site as well as on-site handling and installation of those conformal pads.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an interface pad that is mechanically attached to a tie, in order to eliminate undesirable movement of the pad during shipping, installation and service.
It is a further object of the invention to provide an interface pad that is manufactured and shaped for secure installation on a tie in a grade crossing.
These and other objects of the invention will be appreciated by reference to the summary of the invention and to the detailed description of the preferred embodiment that follow.
The interface pad of the invention is a two-piece system comprising a stiffener supporting a resilient cushioning pad made of a durable, elastic material. Preferably the stiffener is manufactured first, and then the resilient pad is molded onto the stiffener. The resilient pad may be divided into discrete quarters or other fractions, which helps to eliminate undesirable pad deformation during manufacture. The outer edges and corners of the resilient pad are preferably given a chamfered, beveled or rounded shape, or any shape suitable to minimize sharp or protruding parts, in order to minimize the chance that a corner or edge of the interface pad will catch on something during is transport or installation and be torn or scraped off the tie.
In an alternative embodiment, the stiffener may be encompassed substantially within the resilient pad. Preferably the stiffener is manufactured first, and then the resilient material is molded around the stiffener. In this embodiment, the stiffener may be a plate, in which case the features and functions of this embodiment of the invention are similar to those described in relation to the first embodiment. Alternatively, the stiffener may be shaped, such as in a cupped piece substantially within the resilient pad, to provide different footprints for the interface pad, which may be useful in different grade crossing situations.
The interface pad is designed to be easily mechanically attached to a tie, such as with a fastener through a hole in the pad. The fastener hole is preferably located to accommodate a fastener that can be recessed substantially or completely within the interface pad to prevent the installed fastener from interfering with the panel. The tie itself preferably has a slight recess to accommodate the interface pad, reducing the overall profile of the interface pad once it is in place on a tie, thereby minimizing the potential for displacement of the pad during handling and installation, particularly by the rails or the grade crossing panels sliding over the top surface of the tie.
In one aspect, the invention comprises an interface pad for a tie in a railway grade crossing, the interface pad having an underside to be located proximate the tie and an upper side opposed to the underside, and further comprising a stiffener; a resilient pad supported by said stiffener; and at least one fastener passageway through said stiffener and said resilient pad to accommodate a fastener to secure said interface pad to said tie, wherein the passageway may be shaped to allow the fastener to recede substantially below the upper surface of the resilient pad. The stiffener may comprise a substantially flat plate, although the passageway may extend below the underside of the plate. The stiffener may comprise a plurality of pieces, each of the pieces comprising a substantially flat plate. Alternatively, the stiffener may be cupped and located proximate the fastener passageway in a smaller pad. The overall interface pad may be substantially flat, or may be convex in shape. At least one outside edge of said resilient pad may be chamfered, beveled or rounded, and if the interface pad is a shape, such as a quadrilateral, comprising edges separated by corners, the corners may be chamfered, beveled or rounded.
In a further aspect, the resilient pad on the interface pad may comprise a plurality of sections divided by at least one channel.
In a further aspect, the stiffener may comprise at least one aperture into which the resilient pad protrudes. The aperture may be taper towards the upper side of the resilient pad, relative to the underside of the resilient pad.
In another aspect of the invention, the resilient pad of the interface pad may substantially surround the stiffener. In an embodiment wherein the stiffener comprises a substantially flat plate, the resilient pad may comprise layers of resilient material on opposed sides of the plate. The underside of the passageway extending below the substantially flat plate may not be completely within the resilient material. In an embodiment wherein the stiffener is cupped proximate said fastener passageway, the underside of the stiffener may not be completely within the resilient pad.
In yet another aspect, the invention comprises a grade crossing tie comprising at least one interface pad as described herein, and further comprising a recess in the tie to accommodate each interface pad.
The foregoing was intended as a broad summary only and of only some of the aspects of the invention. It was not intended to define the limits or requirements of the invention. Other aspects of the invention will be appreciated by reference to the detailed description of the preferred embodiment and to the claims.
The preferred embodiment of the invention will be described by reference to the drawings in which:
Referring to
Referring now to
Preferably resilient pad 26 is made of a material such as rubber, artificial rubber, polyurethane, or any similarly durable and resilient material of approximately a 60-90 Shore A durometer hardness, such that the resilient pad 26 is durable enough to withstand scraping and pulling that might occur as the tie is being installed and as the grade crossing panels are being installed on the ties, while still being able to cushion and support the panels.
To manufacture the interface pad 22, the stiffener 28 may be produced first, in dimensions corresponding to the width of the rail tie 12 on which it will be disposed. The dimensions may further be selected based on the approximate shape and approximate depth of a recess 24 (shown in
To ensure durable contact between the resilient pad 26 and the stiffener 28, an adhesive or other suitable bonding agent may be applied between the resilient pad 26 and stiffener 28. Additionally or alternatively, the stiffener 28 may comprise apertures 34, best seen in
Interface pad 22 may be provided with a passageway 36 to accommodate a fastener at or near the centre of the interface pad, or at any point or points suitable to sufficiently fasten the interface pad 22 on a tie. Preferably the upper portion of the passageway 36 at the top of the resilient pad 26 has a somewhat larger diameter than the lower portion 40 of the passageway 36 where it passes through the stiffener 28. This change in diameter may be accomplished by any suitable method, such as the shoulder shown in
The recess 24 also allows a slightly thicker interface pad 22 to be installed, for example a ½″ pad instead of a more typical ¼″, providing better cushioning through the grade crossing without significantly increasing the overall height of a tie bearing the installed interface pads 22. This arrangement minimizes the chances that an interface pad 22 will be scraped off of a tie during shipping or installation of the grade crossing rails or is panels.
In an interface pad 22 shaped like a rectangle, as show in the figures, the corners separating the outer edges of the resilient pad 26 are preferably shaped to minimize or eliminate sharp or protruding edges, such as by providing chamfered, beveled or rounded corners, in order to minimize the chances that a corner of the interface pad 22 will catch on something during shipping or installation and be torn off the tie. It will be understood that an interface pad of a shape having corners, such as a triangle, or a square, rectangle or other quadrilateral shape, may preferably have similarly shaped corners. Further, it is preferred that all outer edges of the resilient pad 26 be similarly shaped, also in order to minimize the chances that the resilient pad 26 will catch on something.
A second embodiment of the interface pad 22A is shown in
In any of the foregoing embodiments, the interface pad 22 may be provided with some small degree of curvature, such that the pad 22 itself is slightly convex on the upper side, as best shown in
In some situations, it may be preferable to use an interface pad 22 having a smaller footprint. For example, a narrower tie would require a smaller interface pad. An is interface pad with a smaller footprint relative to the size of the fastener has less pad material located some distance away from the fastener. This can increase the inherent stability of the pad, making it more difficult to remove from the tie.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other variations to the preferred embodiments described herein may be practised without departing from the scope of the invention, such scope being properly defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2828080 | Rennels | May 1954 | A |
4117977 | Whitlock | Oct 1978 | A |
4421272 | Whitlock | Dec 1983 | A |
4445640 | Caillet | May 1984 | A |
4449666 | Hales et al. | May 1984 | A |
4846401 | Kennel | Jul 1989 | A |
5494212 | Owen | Feb 1996 | A |
5538182 | Davis et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5626289 | Demers, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
6422478 | Lucas, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20070200005 | Corbett et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080083835 | Girardi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2281110 | Aug 2007 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130026246 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |