Graded spacers in spiral wound elements

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11612862
  • Patent Number
    11,612,862
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 13, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 28, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Embodiments of the present invention provide elements that are beneficial for use in fluid filtration. Embodiments provide elements that have variable feed spacer height, variable permeate spacer height, or both. The variable height allows flow properties to be matched to fluid volume as the filtration occurs.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The subject invention relates to a membrane or filtration system utilized for the separation of fluid components, specifically spiral-wound membrane elements and flat membrane elements.


BACKGROUND

Spiral-wound membrane filtration elements generally consist of a laminated structure comprised of a membrane sheet sealed to or around a porous permeate carrier which creates a path for removal, longitudinally to the axis of the center tube, of the fluid passing through the membrane to a central tube, while this laminated structure is wrapped spirally around the central tube and spaced from itself with a porous feed spacer to allow axial flow of the fluid through the element. Traditionally, a feed spacer is used to allow flow of the feed water, some portion of which will pass through the membrane, into the spiral wound element and allow reject water to exit the element in a direction parallel to the center tube and axial to the element construction.


An alternate design of a spiral wound element allows for the feed to reject stream to flow in the same longitudinal direction of the spiral would membrane as the permeate flow, either from the outside of the spiral to the center, or from the inside of the spiral to the outside. Such a design requires a specially modified divided center tube to allow two separate flow paths, and also requires that both axial ends of the element are fully sealed to create the longitudinal flow path. This design of a spiral would element can be advantageous in providing an increased flow velocity and fluid shear within the feed to reject stream when compared to the traditional cross-flow design. Increased flow velocity can be beneficial for the prevention of organic and inorganic fouling of the membrane and feed spacer, as well as reducing concentration polarization within the element as liquid passes through the membrane. Examples of such elements are those manufactured by Pentair Corporation under the trade name GRO.


It is also a source of flow restriction and pressure drop within the axial flow channel and also presents areas of restriction of flow and contact to the membrane that contribute significantly to membrane fouling via biological growth, scale formation, and particle capture.


SUMMARY

Embodiments of the present invention provide elements that are beneficial for use in fluid filtration. Embodiments provide elements that have variable feed spacer height, variable permeate spacer height, or both. The variable height allows flow properties to be matched to fluid volume as the filtration occurs.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a longitudinal flow spiral wound element.



FIG. 2 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled longitudinal flow element with height graded deposited feed spacer.



FIG. 3 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled longitudinal flow element with height graded deposited feed spacer and height graded deposited permeate carrier.



FIG. 4 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled longitudinal flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer and a height graded mesh permeate carrier.



FIG. 5 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled longitudinal flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer and a height graded deposited permeate carrier.



FIG. 6 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled axial flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer and a height graded mesh permeate carrier.



FIG. 7 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled axial flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer and a height graded deposited permeate carrier.



FIG. 8 is a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled axial flow element with deposited height graded feed spacer and a height graded deposited permeate carrier.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

Improvements to the design of spiral wound elements have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,357 to Barger et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,311,831 to Bradford et al., and patent application PCT/US14/18813 to Herrington et al. which replaces the feed spacer with islands or protrusions either deposited or embossed directly onto the inside or outside surface of the membrane. None of these patents or applications, however, teaches a graded feed spacer or permeate carrier pattern height perpendicular to the axis of the center tube. The inventors have discovered that this configuration can be advantageous in that it maintains spacing for axial flow through the element while minimizing obstruction within the flow channel. In a brine feed spacer, concentration polarization increases at the reject end of the feed space as water molecules go through the membrane and reject salt ions. By having a thinner feed channel height at the reject end of the feed space, fluid shear is increased, thereby reducing the negative effects of concentration polarization. A printed or deposited spacer also eliminates the porous brine feed spacer as a separate component, thus simplifying element manufacture. On the permeate side of the membrane, as more and more water passes through the membrane, the volume of water flow increases as the water approaches the center tube. By gradually increasing the height of the space in the permeate flow region as fluid approaches the center tube, more volume (or cross section) is available in the space to minimize fluid velocity and subsequently reduce back pressure in the permeate space.


Due to the nature of membrane filtration, the inlet flow volume is continuously reduced while it flows across the membrane, and the permeate flow volume increases down the length of the permeate carrier. The reject flow volume represents the difference between the inlet flow and the permeate flow, and comprises the full content of the dissolved or suspended materials which are not able to flow through the membrane, and are thus at a higher concentration in the reject stream than the inlet feed stream.


The present invention provides a gradation in the brine feed spacing height in longitudinal flow spiral wound elements such that the height of the brine feed spacing decreases from the flow stream to the reject stream, allowing for more consistent or increased flow velocity as the volumetric flow through the feed to reject stream is reduced due to flow across the membrane. FIG. 1 depicts a longitudinal flow spiral wound element comprising one layer of membrane sheet 1, graded height feed spacer features 2 deposited on a second layer of membrane sheet 9 with a fixed height permeate carrier 3. The direction of feed flow and permeate flow are concurrent inward from the outer edge. The height of the feed spacer decreases from the point most distant from the center tube 6 to the point closest to it. The reject flow and permeate flow are collected through separate openings in a divided center tube 6. Glue lines 7 seal the edges of the element and produce longitudinal feed to reject flow within the element. FIG. 2 shows the same element in an unwound configuration so that the height gradation in the feed spacer features 2 can be seen more clearly. In the remainder of the drawings, membrane sheet 1 is depicted above and below in the diagram to visually represent the flow paths of the feed and permeate streams, but in use is only a single membrane sheet which creates the 2nd flow channel when the spiral-wound element is rolled. As the brine flows from the feed end toward the reject stream at the center tube, volumetric flow in the feed channel is reduced as water passes through the membrane to the permeate carrier. Decreasing the height of the feed spacer allows for constant or increased flow velocity in the feed stream as the volumetric flow decreases, which can be advantageous in preventing scale formation in the element. Likewise, by decreasing the height of the feed spacer along its length, overall leaf length can be increased while keeping the element diameter constant, allowing for additional surface area within the element.


Similarly the height of the permeate carrier can be decreased at the longitudinal end of the element most distant from the center tube, where the volumetric flow is at its minimum, and increased as the volumetric flow increases towards the center tube. The height of the brine feed spacer can be increased at the longitudinal end of the element most distant from the center tube while the permeate carrier height is decreased commensurately so that the overall thickness of the feed spacer, membrane sheet, and permeate carrier are a constant thickness throughout the assembly. The heights can also be varied to achieve an increasing or decreasing overall thickness if desired. The variable height of both of these spacers can be achieved, as examples, by layering conventionally utilized mesh spacers of various heights or by depositing features on the membrane sheet whose height varies longitudinally directly onto one or both sides of the membrane sheet before element assembly. FIG. 3, depicts an unrolled longitudinal flow element with a deposited variable height feed spacer 2 which decreases in height from feed to reject flow between membrane sheets 1, 9. A height graded deposited permeate carrier 4 increases in height from the end most distant from the divided center tube 6 to the attachment to the divided center tube 6; in the example shown the increase in height matches the decrease in height of the feed spacer. The permeate carrier is bounded on 3 sides by glue lines 7, while the feed spacer is bounded only on the outer edges. The direction of feed flow and permeate flow are concurrent inward from the outer edge to the divided center tube 6. The combination of decreasing feed height and increasing permeate height optimizes the overall volume of the element, maintaining more constant longitudinal volumetric flow throughout both the feed spacer and the permeate carrier.


In traditional axial brine feed flow and in longitudinal flow elements, another example embodiment of the present invention employs a gradation in the height of only the permeate carrier, increasing in thickness longitudinally from the point most distant from the center tube to the point adjacent the center tube. An example industry standard permeate carrier can be 0.010″ in height throughout its length. By providing a permeate carrier which is thinner, for example 0.002″ at the edge most distant from the center tube, increasing in height to 0.010″ at the edge closest to the center tube, the length of the envelope comprising the membrane sheet and permeate carrier can be increased, providing additional surface area for filtration, while maintaining a constant volume of the element overall. The variable height of this spacer can be achieved, as examples, by layering conventionally utilized mesh spacers of various heights or by depositing features on the membrane sheet whose height varies radially directly onto one side of the membrane sheet before element assembly. In axial flow elements multiple leaves can be used, with each permeate carrier comprising a graded height spacer.



FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of an unrolled longitudinal flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer 5 between membrane sheets 1, 9. A height graded mesh permeate carrier 3, created from three separate sheets of thin mesh, increases in height from the end most distant from the divided center tube 6 to the attachment to the divided center tube 6 bounded, by glue lines 7. The direction of feed flow and permeate flow are concurrent inward from the outer edge to the divided center tube 6. In this embodiment, as well as those shown in FIG. 5-FIG. 7, the reduced thickness of permeate carrier at distal end enables longer leaf length in a given diameter element due to reduced overall permeate carrier volume, while maintaining sufficient cross sectional area for adequate permeate flow throughout.



FIG. 5 depicts a further embodiment of an unrolled longitudinal flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer 5 between membrane sheets 1, 9. Here, a height graded deposited permeate carrier 4 increases in height from the end most distant from the divided center tube 6 to the attachment to the divided center tube 6, bounded by glue lines 7. The direction of feed flow and permeate flow are concurrent inward from the outer edge to the divided center tube 6.


In an example embodiment shown in FIG. 6, an axial flow element employs a deposited fixed height feed spacer 5 between membrane sheets 1, 9 with a height graded mesh permeate carrier 3, created from three separate sheets of thin mesh, which increases in height from the end most distant from the center tube to the attachment to the center tube 8, bounded by glue lines 7. Permeate flows longitudinally inward towards the center tube while feed-to-reject flows axially, parallel to the axis of center tube 8.


In another example axial flow embodiment, FIG. 7 shows a longitudinal cross section illustration of an unrolled axial flow element with deposited fixed height feed spacer 5 between membrane sheets 1, 9 with a height graded deposited permeate carrier 4 which increases in height from the end most distant from the center tube to the attachment to the center tube 8, bounded by glue lines 7. Permeate flows longitudinally inward towards the center tube while feed-to-reject flows axially, parallel to the axis of center tube 8.


In another embodiment, the height of the brine feed spacer is decreased from the brine feed inlet to its outlet in an axial flow element. This configuration allows for more consistent or increased brine flow velocity as the volumetric flow through the feed to reject stream is reduced due to flow across the membrane. Maintaining more constant axial volumetric flow throughout the feed space can be advantageous in preventing scale formation in an axial flow element. In this case, the height of the permeate carrier must be decreased commensurately so that the overall thickness of the feed spacer, membrane sheet, and permeate carrier are a constant thickness throughout the assembly to allow for uniform rolling. The variable height of both of these spacers can be achieved, as examples, by layering conventionally utilized mesh spacers of various heights or by depositing features on the membrane sheet whose height varies spirally directly onto one or both sides of the membrane sheet before element assembly. FIG. 8 depicts such an embodiment with a section of an axial flow element with deposited variable height feed spacer 2 which decreases in height from feed to reject flow between membrane sheets 1, 9 with a height graded deposited permeate carrier 4 which increases in height in the direction from feed to reject flow, bounded by glue lines 7.


Some permeable membrane systems use flat sheets instead of spiral-wound configurations and it can be seen that using graded height feed spacers, decreasing in height from inlet to outlet, in conjunction with inversely graded permeate spacers, can optimize volumetric flow in such systems as well. The example embodiments described, left in their unrolled states as illustrated in FIG. 2-FIG. 8, illustrate use in flat sheet systems.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention can be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific example embodiments described and contemplated herein. Accordingly, departures in form and detail can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as described in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An element for use in fluid filtration, comprising: (a) a permeate spacer element, permeable to a fluid;(b) a membrane sheet disposed next to a first surface of the permeate spacer element;(c) a permeable sheet, permeable to a fluid, disposed next to a second surface, opposite the first surface, of the permeate spacer element; and(d) a feed-reject spacer element mounted on a surface of the membrane sheet and separated from the permeate spacer element by the membrane sheet, or mounted on the permeable sheet and separated from the permeate spacer element by the permeable sheet;(e) wherein, the permeate spacer element, permeable sheet, membrane sheet, and feed-reject spacer element are rolled around a central collection tube into a spiral wound element, and the permeate spacer element provides a permeate volume between the permeable sheet and the membrane sheet, and the feed-reject spacer element provides a feed-reject volume between the permeable sheet and the membrane sheet;(f) wherein the central collection tube defines an interior volume that is divided into a tube permeate volume and a tube reject volume, wherein the tube permeate volume is in communication with the exterior of the tube through one or more permeate openings, and the tube reject volume is in communication with the exterior of the tube through one or more reject openings;(g) wherein the permeate spacer element provides a separation that decreases from a first separation proximal the permeate openings to a second separation, lesser than the first separation, distal from the permeate openings.
  • 2. An element as in claim 1, wherein the permeate spacer element comprises an extruded or woven mesh with a varying thickness.
  • 3. An element as in claim 1, wherein the permeate spacer element comprises two or more layers of extruded mesh, woven mesh, or porous material, stacked to provide the varying thickness.
  • 4. An element as in claim 1, wherein the permeate spacer element comprises features deposited on the surface of the membrane sheet facing the permeate volume, or the surface of the permeable sheet facing the permeate volume, or both, where the features project from the surface on which they are deposited by a height that increases from a first height distal from permeate openings to a second height, greater than the first height, proximal to the permeate openings.
  • 5. An element as in claim 1, wherein the feed-reject spacer element comprises an extruded or woven mesh with a varying thickness.
US Referenced Citations (254)
Number Name Date Kind
3963621 Newman Jun 1976 A
4187173 Keefer Feb 1980 A
4208289 Bray Jun 1980 A
4222874 Connelly Sep 1980 A
4228014 Timm et al. Oct 1980 A
4230564 Keefer Oct 1980 A
4230579 Bray et al. Oct 1980 A
4235723 Bartlett, Jr. Nov 1980 A
4277340 Kanamaru et al. Jul 1981 A
4288326 Keefer Sep 1981 A
4309287 Roos et al. Jan 1982 A
4326960 Iwahori et al. Apr 1982 A
4341631 Hargitay Jul 1982 A
4347132 Davis Aug 1982 A
4354939 Pohl Oct 1982 A
4358377 Clark Nov 1982 A
4409849 Roos Oct 1983 A
4410429 Harvey et al. Oct 1983 A
4411785 Yu et al. Oct 1983 A
4426285 Davis Jan 1984 A
4434056 Keefer Feb 1984 A
4454891 Dreibelbis et al. Jun 1984 A
4461707 Thayer et al. Jul 1984 A
4476022 Doll Oct 1984 A
4482459 Shiver Nov 1984 A
4534713 Wanner Aug 1985 A
4556488 Timm et al. Dec 1985 A
4585554 Burrows Apr 1986 A
RE32144 Keefer May 1986 E
4595497 Burrows Jun 1986 A
4599171 Padilla et al. Jul 1986 A
4600512 Aid Jul 1986 A
4608140 Goldstein Aug 1986 A
4613436 Wight et al. Sep 1986 A
4623451 Oliver Nov 1986 A
4623467 Hamlin Nov 1986 A
4640774 Garcera et al. Feb 1987 A
4645601 Regunathan et al. Feb 1987 A
4652373 Trimmer Mar 1987 A
4657674 Burrows Apr 1987 A
4670144 McCausland et al. Jun 1987 A
4695375 Tyler Sep 1987 A
4704324 Davis et al. Nov 1987 A
4705625 Hart, Jr. Nov 1987 A
4735716 Petrucci et al. Apr 1988 A
4735718 Peters Apr 1988 A
4741823 Olsen et al. May 1988 A
4743366 Burrows May 1988 A
4744895 Gales et al. May 1988 A
4744900 Bratt May 1988 A
4756835 Wilson Jul 1988 A
4775465 Burrows Oct 1988 A
4781831 Goldsmith Nov 1988 A
4784771 Wathen et al. Nov 1988 A
4802982 Lien Feb 1989 A
4814079 Schneider Mar 1989 A
4820413 Lopez Apr 1989 A
4830744 Burrows May 1989 A
4832850 Cais et al. May 1989 A
4834873 Burrows May 1989 A
4842725 Blad et al. Jun 1989 A
4842736 Bray Jun 1989 A
4844805 Solomon Jul 1989 A
4855058 Holland et al. Aug 1989 A
4856559 Lipshultz et al. Aug 1989 A
4869821 Korin Sep 1989 A
4874514 Casey Jr. Oct 1989 A
4876002 Marshall et al. Oct 1989 A
4877521 Petrucci et al. Oct 1989 A
4882061 Petrucci et al. Nov 1989 A
4882223 Aptel et al. Nov 1989 A
RE33135 Wanner, Sr. et al. Dec 1989 E
4885092 Zwick Dec 1989 A
4886597 Wild et al. Dec 1989 A
4892657 Mohn et al. Jan 1990 A
4902417 Lien Feb 1990 A
4906372 Hopkins Mar 1990 A
4917847 Solomon Apr 1990 A
4937557 Tucci et al. Jun 1990 A
4944877 Maples Jul 1990 A
4988525 Gresch Jan 1991 A
4990248 Brown et al. Feb 1991 A
4992170 Menon et al. Feb 1991 A
4995977 Hilgendorff et al. Feb 1991 A
5002664 Clack et al. Mar 1991 A
5017284 Miler et al. May 1991 A
5043066 Miller et al. Aug 1991 A
5045197 Burrows Sep 1991 A
5057212 Burrows Oct 1991 A
5069789 Mohn et al. Dec 1991 A
5078876 Whittier et al. Jan 1992 A
5094749 Seita et al. Mar 1992 A
5096574 Birdsong et al. Mar 1992 A
5104532 Thompson et al. Apr 1992 A
5108604 Robbins Apr 1992 A
5128035 Clack et al. Jul 1992 A
5131277 Birdsong et al. Jul 1992 A
5132017 Birdsong et al. Jul 1992 A
5145575 Burrows Sep 1992 A
5167786 Eberle Dec 1992 A
5167826 Eaton Dec 1992 A
5183567 Mohn et al. Feb 1993 A
5194156 None Mar 1993 A
5198110 Hanai et al. Mar 1993 A
5204002 Belfort et al. Apr 1993 A
5232591 Solomon Aug 1993 A
5234583 Cluff Aug 1993 A
5240612 Grangeon et al. Aug 1993 A
5279732 Edens Jan 1994 A
5296148 Colangelo et al. Mar 1994 A
5354464 Slovak et al. Oct 1994 A
5362383 Zimmerman et al. Nov 1994 A
5462414 Permar Oct 1995 A
5466366 Chia-ching Nov 1995 A
5468387 Solomon Nov 1995 A
5507943 Labrador Apr 1996 A
RE35252 Clack et al. May 1996 E
5545320 Heine et al. Aug 1996 A
5573662 Abe et al. Nov 1996 A
5597487 Vogel et al. Jan 1997 A
5626752 Mohn et al. May 1997 A
5626758 Belfort May 1997 A
5628198 Permar May 1997 A
5681459 Bowman Oct 1997 A
5681467 Solie et al. Oct 1997 A
5788858 Acernese et al. Aug 1998 A
5795475 Luedke et al. Aug 1998 A
5811251 Hirose et al. Sep 1998 A
5824217 Pearl et al. Oct 1998 A
5914041 Chancellor Jun 1999 A
5944985 Bowman Aug 1999 A
5985146 Knappe et al. Nov 1999 A
6030535 Hayashi et al. Feb 2000 A
6071404 Tsui Jun 2000 A
6071414 Kishi Jun 2000 A
6099735 Kelada Aug 2000 A
6109029 Vowles et al. Aug 2000 A
6110360 Hart, Jr. Aug 2000 A
6117297 Goldstein Sep 2000 A
6120682 Cook Sep 2000 A
6126833 Stobbe et al. Oct 2000 A
6174437 Haney Jan 2001 B1
6190557 Hisada et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193879 Bowman Feb 2001 B1
6197191 Wobben Mar 2001 B1
6217773 Graham Apr 2001 B1
6258270 Hilgendorff et al. Jul 2001 B1
6277282 Kihara et al. Aug 2001 B1
6299766 Permar Oct 2001 B1
6345961 Oklejas, Jr. Feb 2002 B1
6348148 Bosley Feb 2002 B1
6379518 Osawa et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379548 Kurokawa et al. Apr 2002 B1
6383384 Anderson May 2002 B1
RE37759 Belfort Jun 2002 E
6402956 Andou et al. Jun 2002 B1
6423212 Bosko Jul 2002 B1
6423223 Northcut et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432301 Dengler Aug 2002 B1
6436282 Gundrum et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447259 Elliott-Moore Sep 2002 B2
6514398 DiMascio et al. Feb 2003 B2
6521124 Northcut et al. Feb 2003 B2
6521127 Chancellor Feb 2003 B1
6524478 Heine et al. Feb 2003 B1
6540915 Patil Apr 2003 B2
6575308 Fuls et al. Jun 2003 B1
6579451 Avero Jun 2003 B1
6607668 Rela Aug 2003 B2
6613231 Jitariouk Sep 2003 B1
6632357 Barger et al. Oct 2003 B1
6790345 Broussard Sep 2004 B2
6805796 Hirose et al. Oct 2004 B2
6830683 Gundrum et al. Dec 2004 B2
6866831 Nakao et al. Mar 2005 B2
6929743 Diel Aug 2005 B2
6929748 Avijit et al. Aug 2005 B2
7021667 Campbell et al. Apr 2006 B2
7186331 Maartens et al. Mar 2007 B2
7244357 Herrington et al. Jul 2007 B2
7297268 Herrington et al. Nov 2007 B2
7306437 Hauge Dec 2007 B2
7311831 Bradford et al. Dec 2007 B2
7351335 Broens et al. Apr 2008 B2
7387725 Choi et al. Jun 2008 B2
7416666 Gordon Aug 2008 B2
7449093 Dudziak et al. Nov 2008 B2
7455778 Gordon Nov 2008 B2
7501064 Schmidt et al. Mar 2009 B2
7514010 Salmon Apr 2009 B2
7520981 Barber Apr 2009 B2
7540956 Kurth et al. Jun 2009 B1
7650805 Nauseda et al. Jan 2010 B2
7733459 Dierichs et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736503 Kennedy et al. Jun 2010 B2
7862723 Cartwright Jan 2011 B2
7875184 Parker et al. Jan 2011 B2
7892429 Oklejas, Jr. Feb 2011 B2
7901580 Salyer Mar 2011 B2
7909998 Kennedy et al. Mar 2011 B2
7910004 Cohen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7927082 Haudenschild Apr 2011 B2
7981293 Powell Jul 2011 B2
8021550 Beauchamp et al. Sep 2011 B2
8101074 Larsen Jan 2012 B2
8114286 Kawakami Feb 2012 B2
8147699 Goldsmith Apr 2012 B2
8257594 Astle et al. Sep 2012 B2
8282823 Acernese et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292088 Francisco et al. Oct 2012 B2
8292492 Ho et al. Oct 2012 B2
8414767 Gaignet et al. Apr 2013 B2
8425734 Goel et al. Apr 2013 B2
8454829 Yaeger Jun 2013 B2
8506685 Taylor et al. Aug 2013 B2
8518225 Sumita et al. Aug 2013 B2
8628642 Goel et al. Jan 2014 B2
8652326 Johann et al. Feb 2014 B2
8685252 Vuong et al. Apr 2014 B2
8696904 Thiyagarajan et al. Apr 2014 B2
8771510 Takahashi et al. Jul 2014 B2
8778055 Taylor et al. Jul 2014 B2
8808538 Oklejas, Jr. Aug 2014 B2
8889009 Brausch et al. Nov 2014 B2
8944257 Eisen et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961790 Beauchamp et al. Feb 2015 B2
8968566 Beauchamp et al. Mar 2015 B2
8999162 Vuong et al. Apr 2015 B2
9011664 Takahashi et al. Apr 2015 B2
9011688 Takahashi et al. Apr 2015 B2
9108162 Takahashi et al. Aug 2015 B2
9114365 Schmitt Aug 2015 B2
9260325 Takahashi et al. Feb 2016 B2
9328743 Hirosawa et al. May 2016 B2
9387445 Kimura et al. Jul 2016 B2
9403125 Shaffer Aug 2016 B2
9475008 Salama et al. Oct 2016 B2
9492792 Tomescu et al. Nov 2016 B2
9546671 Hirosawa et al. Jan 2017 B2
9597640 Koiwa et al. Mar 2017 B2
9616390 Hirozawa et al. Apr 2017 B2
9617172 Baski Apr 2017 B1
9724646 Okamoto et al. Aug 2017 B2
9731984 Beall Aug 2017 B2
9758389 Rau, III Sep 2017 B2
9764291 Hirozawa et al. Sep 2017 B2
9808767 Tabayashi et al. Nov 2017 B2
20080290031 Popa Nov 2008 A1
20110036774 McGinnis Feb 2011 A1
20120103892 Beauchamp et al. May 2012 A1
20130334128 Takagi et al. Dec 2013 A1
20160008763 Roderick et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160059188 Liberman Mar 2016 A1
20160236132 Hara et al. Aug 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
2662925 Jan 2009 CA
2825674 Aug 2011 CA
2902094 Aug 2015 EP
H06 262026 Sep 1994 JP
2009 195871 Sep 2009 JP
2016 137462 Aug 2016 JP
WO2010047360 Apr 2010 WO
WO2015016253 Feb 2015 WO
WO2002055179 Aug 2015 WO
WO2016199272 Dec 2016 WO
WO2017087461 May 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Schwinge et al., “Spriral Wound Modules and Spaces”, 2004, Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 242, No. 1-2.
Evangelista et al., “Optimal Design and Performances of Spiral Wound Modules”, 1988, Chem. Eng. Comm., vol. 72, pp. 66-81.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210339203 A1 Nov 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62484562 Apr 2017 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16072852 US
Child 17374665 US