This disclosure relates generally to quantum and classical circuit systems, and specifically to a gradiometric flux qubit system.
Superconducting qubits can take the form of an oscillator that can transfer energy between some combination of an electric field of a capacitor, a magnetic field of an inductor, and a superconducting phase difference, such as from a Josephson junction. One example of a qubit is a flux qubit (e.g., persistent current qubits). A flux qubit can be configured as a micrometer sized loop of superconducting metal interrupted by a number of Josephson junctions. The junction parameters can be designed during fabrication so that a persistent current can flow continuously when an external magnetic flux is applied. As only an integer number of flux quanta is allowed to penetrate the superconducting ring, a clockwise or a counter-clockwise current is developed in the loop to compensate a non-integer external flux bias. When the applied flux through the loop area is close to a half-integer number of flux quanta, the two lowest energy eigenstates of the loop can correspond to a quantum superposition of the clockwise and counter-clockwise currents.
One example includes a flux qubit readout circuit. The circuit includes a gradiometric superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) that is configured to inductively couple with a gradiometric flux qubit to modify flux associated with the gradiometric SQUID based on a flux state of the flux qubit. The circuit also includes a current source configured to provide a readout current through the gradiometric SQUID during a state readout operation to determine the flux state of the gradiometric flux qubit at a readout node.
Another example includes a method for reading a flux-state of a gradiometric flux qubit. The method includes providing a tuning voltage to a gradiometric superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) to set a flux state of at least one readout flux loop associated with the gradiometric SQUID. The gradiometric SQUID can be inductively coupled with the gradiometric flux qubit. The method also includes providing a readout current through the gradiometric SQUID during a state readout operation. The method further includes detecting a voltage state at a readout node coupled to the gradiometric SQUID to determine the flux state of the gradiometric flux qubit based on the flux state of the at least one readout flux loop.
Another example includes a flux qubit system. The system includes a gradiometric flux qubit comprising a first qubit flux loop and a second qubit flux loop. The system also includes a flux qubit readout circuit. The flux qubit readout circuit includes a first readout flux loop inductively coupled to the first qubit flux loop. The flux qubit readout circuit also includes a second readout flux loop inductively coupled to the second qubit flux loop and being arranged in parallel with the first flux loop in a gradiometric flux configuration between a readout node and a voltage reference node. The flux qubit readout circuit further includes a current source configured to provide a readout current to the first and second readout flux loops during a state readout to determine a flux state of the gradiometric flux qubit. The flux state can be determined at the readout node.
This disclosure relates generally to quantum and classical circuit systems, and specifically to a gradiometric flux qubit system. The gradiometric flux qubit readout system can include a gradiometric flux qubit and a gradiometric flux readout circuit that includes a gradiometric SQUID. As described herein, the term “gradiometric” refers to a symmetric arrangement of flux loops in which the persistent current flows in opposite orientations to provide differential flux of opposing polarity (e.g., Δ-flux, or ΦΔ) through the respective flux loops of the gradiometric device (e.g., the gradiometric flux qubit and the gradiometric SQUID). Therefore, the flux states of the respective gradiometric devices are superpositions of persistent currents in the differential mode of the respective gradiometric device so that the respective energy levels of the gradiometric device are insensitive to changes in common mode flux (e.g., α-flux, or Φα).
The gradiometric SQUID includes a first readout flux loop and a second readout flux loop that are inductively coupled, respectively, to a first qubit flux loop and a second qubit flux loop associated with the respective gradiometric flux qubit. As an example, the gradiometric SQUID and the gradiometric flux qubit can be fabricated in a planar arrangement on a substrate, and thus without any signal crossover associated with the respective persistent currents. For example, the gradiometric SQUID can also include at least one tuning input configured to receive a tuning voltage to set a flux state associated with the gradiometric SQUID, and thus opposing flux associated with each of the first and second readout flux loops. The gradiometric flux readout circuit can also include a current source configured to generate a readout current that is provided through the gradiometric SQUIDs. Based on the inductive coupling of the gradiometric SQUID to the gradiometric flux qubit, the flux state of the gradiometric SQUID can be modified, such that the readout current can be configured to trigger at least one Josephson junction associated with the gradiometric SQUID. For example, the readout current can be generated as a current ramp, such that the flux state can be determined based on an elapsed time during a state readout operation before a readout node associated with the gradiometric flux readout circuit is in a voltage state in response to the triggering of the Josephson junction(s).
The gradiometric readout circuit 14 can be configured to read the quantum flux state of the gradiometric flux qubit 12 based on an interaction of the flux of the gradiometric SQUID 16 and the gradiometric flux qubit 12 via the inductive coupling 18. For example, the flux associated with the flux loops of the gradiometric flux qubit 12 can modify the flux associated with the flux loops of the gradiometric SQUID 16, such that the persistent currents flowing about the respective flux loops of the gradiometric SQUID 16 can either increase or decrease to affect a triggering threshold of at least one Josephson junction associated with the gradiometric SQUID 16. In the example of
The gradiometric readout circuit 50 includes a gradiometric SQUID 52 that includes a first readout flux loop 54 and a second readout flux loop 56 that are arranged in parallel. The first readout flux loop 54 includes a first Josephson junction J1 and a second Josephson junction J2 arranged in parallel. Similarly, the second readout flux loop 56 includes the first Josephson junction J1 and a third Josephson junction J3 arranged in parallel, such that the first, second, and third Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 are all arranged in parallel between a readout node 58 and a node 60 that is coupled to a low voltage rail (e.g., ground). The first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56 are configured to propagate currents in response to a flux state that corresponds to flux of opposite polarity being provided through the first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56, as described in greater detail herein.
The gradiometric readout circuit 50 also includes a first tuning input 62 and a second tuning input 64 that are coupled to the node 60. The first tuning input 62 is configured to receive a first tuning voltage VΦ1 and the second tuning input 64 is configured to receive a second tuning voltage VΦ2 to set a flux state of the gradiometric SQUID 52. In the example of
The gradiometric readout circuit 50 further includes a current source 66 that is configured to generate a readout current IB. As an example, the readout current IB can be generated as a current ramp, and thus having an amplitude that increases as a function of time. The current source 66 is arranged between the low voltage rail and the readout node 58, and can thus provide the readout current IB through the first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56, and thus through the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3. In response, the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 are configured to trigger to set the readout node 58 to a voltage state, and thus to assert a readout signal RO. For example, based on the interaction of the flux associated with the gradiometric flux qubit 12 with respect to the opposite-polarity flux of the first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56, the currents propagating about the first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56 are either increased or decreased to likewise increase or decrease the thresholds of the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3. As described herein, the “threshold” of the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 refers to the amplitude of the readout current IB that is required to trigger the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3, either based on the sum of the currents in the first and second flux loops 54 and 56 flowing through the Josephson junction J1 or the currents in the first and second flux loops 54 and 56 flowing through the Josephson junctions J2 and J3. Accordingly, the amplitude of the readout current IB, and thus the time elapsed during the state readout operation, can determine the time at which the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 trigger to provide the voltage state, and thus the assertion of the readout signal RO at the readout node 58. As a result, the time of assertion of the readout signal RO can be determinative of the flux state of the associated gradiometric flux qubit.
The gradiometric flux qubit 102 includes a first qubit flux loop 104 and a second qubit flux loop 106 that are arranged in parallel with each other, and which each include a first Josephson junction J4 and a second Josephson junction J5. The gradiometric flux qubit 102 also includes a parallel set of Josephson junctions J6 and J7, such that the Josephson junction J6 is associated with the first qubit flux loop 104 and the Josephson junction J7 is associated with the second qubit flux loop 106. In the example of
The gradiometric flux qubit system 150 demonstrates the gradiometric flux qubit 102 and the gradiometric readout circuit 50. The gradiometric flux qubit 102 is demonstrated as having the first flux state 108, with the first qubit flux loop 104 propagating a counter-clockwise current 112 and the second qubit flux loop 106 propagating a clockwise current 114. The gradiometric readout circuit 50 is demonstrated in proximity to the gradiometric flux qubit 102 to facilitate a readout of the flux state of the gradiometric flux qubit 102. For example, the gradiometric readout circuit 50 and the gradiometric flux qubit 102 can be fabricated in a planar arrangement on a substrate (not shown). The gradiometric readout circuit 50 is demonstrated as receiving the tuning voltages VΦ1 and VΦ2 at the respective tuning inputs 62 and 64 to provide differential flux, and thus counter-propagating currents, demonstrated at 152 and 154, about the respective readout flux loops 54 and 56.
For example, based on the application of the tuning voltages VΦ1 and VΦ2, a current can propagate along the tuning inputs 62 and 64 to induce the respective currents 152 and 154 in response to an inductive coupling of the tuning inputs 62 and 64 to a portion of the respective first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56, demonstrated at 156. While the currents 152 and 154 are demonstrated in the example of
Based on the proximity of the gradiometric flux qubit 102 with the gradiometric SQUID 52 of the gradiometric readout circuit 50, the first qubit flux loop 104 is inductively coupled to the first readout flux loop 54 and the second qubit flux loop 106 is inductively coupled to the second readout flux loop 56, demonstrated in the example of
In the example of
As another example, the second amplitude ITΦ2 can correspond to the threshold associated with the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 in the first flux state 108 of the gradiometric flux qubit 102, resulting from the currents 112 and 114 propagating in the opposite direction with respect to the currents 152 and 154. As a result, if the gradiometric flux qubit 102 is in the first flux state 108, the threshold of the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 is increased based on the modification of the flux of the first and second readout flux loops 54 and 56 via the inductive coupling 158, resulting in a decrease in the amplitude of the currents 152 and 154. Accordingly, if the gradiometric flux qubit 102 is in the first flux state 108, the Josephson junctions J1, J2, and J3 begin to trigger at a time T2, corresponding to a relatively longer elapsed time from initiation of the state readout operation. Therefore, the readout signal RO being asserted (e.g., having a rising-edge) at approximately the time T2 after initiation of the state readout operation can indicate that the gradiometric flux qubit 102 is in the first flux state 108.
Therefore, the examples of
In view of the foregoing structural and functional features described above, a methodology in accordance with various aspects of the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to
What have been described above are examples of the present invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This invention was made with Government support under Contract No. 30059298. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6320369 | Hidaka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
20020180006 | Franz | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040012407 | Amin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20090167342 | Van Den Brink et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2015035129 | Feb 2015 | JP |
2017083154 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kakuyanagi K et al: “Experimental analysis of the measurement strength dependence of superconducting qubit readout using a Josephson bifurcation readout method”, Apr. 17, 2013, New Journal of Physics, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB, vol. 15, No. 043028, abstract, figures 1, 2, section 2. |
Schwarz, et al.: “Gradiometric Flux Qubits with a Tunable Gap”: New Journal of Physics 15 (2013) 045001 (21pp) Received Sep. 25, 2012; Published Apr. 4, 2013; Online at http://www.njp.org/; doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/045001. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2018/040611 dated Dec. 4, 2018. |
Deng, H. et al. “Working Point Adjustable DC-SQUID for the Readout of Gap Tunable Flux Qubit” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US, vol. 2. No. 3, Jun. 1, 2015 (Jun. 1, 2015), pp. 1-4, XP011574861, ISSN: 1051-8223, DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2015.2399272 [retrieved on Mar. 5, 2015] abstract; figures 1,3 Section II (Experimental). |
Schwarz M J et al. “Paper; Gradiometric flux qubits with a tunable gap; Gradiometric flux qubits with a tunable gap”,New Journal of Physics, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB,vol. 15, No. 4, Apr. 4, 2013 (Apr. 4, 2013), p. 45001, XP020240001, ISSN: 1367-2630, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/045001. abstract; figures 4, 5. 4. Experimental results and discussion. |
Harris R et al: “Experimental Demonstration of a Robust and Scalable Flux Qubit”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca , NY 14853,Sep. 24, 2009 (Sep. 24, 2009), XP080368167, 001 : 10.1103/PHYSREVB.81.134510 abstract; figure 5 111. Device Architecture, Fabrication and Readout Operation. |
Chiarello F et al: “of a Double SQUID Device for Quantum Computing Experiments”,IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Service Center,Los Alamitos, CA, US,vol. 17, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2007 (Jun. 1, 2007), pp. 124-127, XP011188133,ISSN: 1051-8223, DOI:10 . 1109/TASC.2007.897367 abstract; figure 1 section III. Qubit readout. |
Fabio Chiarello et al: “Superconducting tunable flux qubit with direct readout scheme; Superconducting tunable flux qubit with direct readout scheme”,Superconductor Science and Technology, IOP Publishing, Techno House, Bristol, GB,vol. 18, No. 10, Oct. 1, 2005 (Oct. 1, 2005), pp. 1370-1373, XP020087996, ISSN : 0953 -204.8, DOI:10.1088/0953-2048/18/10/021 abstract; figure 2 Section 3. Integrated direct readout. |
Shao-Xiong Li et al: “Efficiency of underdamped de SQUIDS as readout devices for flux qubits”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US,vol. 13, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2003 (Jun. 1, 2003), pp. 982-985, XP011097942,ISSN: 1051-8223, DOI:10 .1109/TASC.2003.814119 abstract; figure 1 p. 982-p. 983. |
Berggren K K et al: “Resonant Readout of a Persistent Current Qubit”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos, CA, US,vol. 15, No. 2, Jun. 1, 2005 (Jun. 1, 2005), pp. 841-844, XP011133957,ISSN: 1051-8223, DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2005.850077 abstract; figures 1-5 Sections II and III. |
Georg M Reuther et al: “Time-resolved qubit readout via nonlinear Josephson inductance”, arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, May 5, 2011 (May 5, 2011), XP080505689,DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093022 abstract Sections 3 and 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190013065 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |