Graft fixation using a plug against suture

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10709436
  • Patent Number
    10,709,436
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 20, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 14, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method for securing soft tissue to bone which does not require the surgeon to tie suture knots to secure the tissue to the bone. Suture is passed through the graft at desired points. A cannulated plug or screw is pre-loaded onto the distal end of a driver provided with an eyelet implant at its distal end. Suture attached to the graft is passed through the eyelet of the implant located at the distal end of the driver. The distal end of the driver together with the eyelet implant is inserted into the bone. Tension is applied to the suture to position the graft at the desired location relative to the bone. The screw or plug is advanced into the pilot hole by turning the interference screw or tapping the plug until the cannulated screw or plug securely engages and locks in the eyelet implant, so that the cannulated plug or screw with the engaged eyelet implant is flush with the bone. Once the screw or plug is fully inserted and the suture is impacted into the bone, the driver is removed and any loose ends of the sutures protruding from the anchor site are then clipped short.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods and instruments for fixation of sutures and tissue to bone.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

When soft tissue such as a ligament or a tendon becomes detached from a bone, surgery is usually required to reattach or reconstruct the tissue. Often, a tissue graft is attached to the bone to facilitate regrowth and permanent attachment. Various fixation devices, including sutures, screws, staples, wedges, and plugs have been used in the past to secure soft tissue to bone. For example, in typical interference screw fixation, the graft is fixed to the bone by driving the screw into a blind hole or a tunnel in the bone while trapping the end of the graft between the screw and the bone tunnel. In other methods, the graft is simply pinned against the bone using staples or sutures tied around the end of the graft to the bone.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,281, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, discloses a surgical technique and associated instruments for securing soft tissue to bone which does not require the surgeon to tie suture knots to secure the tissue to the bone. According to the technique, a cannulated plug or screw is pre-loaded onto the distal end of a cannulated driver, and a suture or wire loop is passed through the cannula of the driver so that a looped end of the suture or wire is exposed at the distal end of the driver. Suture strands attached to a graft are fed through the loop at the end of the driver, and the driver is inserted into the bottom of the hole, with the screw or plug disposed just outside the hole. With tension applied to the suture or wire loop to keep the graft at the desired location relative to the bone hole, the screw or plug is then fully advanced into the hole using the driver to frictionally secure either the suture attached to the graft or the graft itself into the bone hole.


Although the above-described technique provides an improved method of graft fixation to bone, the flexible loop configuration at the end of the driver disadvantageously impedes sliding of the suture or graft which is fed through the suture loop. In addition, because the cannulated driver of U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,281 is provided with a flexible loop at its distal end, placement of the suture or graft at the bottom of the blind hole or socket and the cortical bone must be approximated, thus sometimes necessitating additional removal, tapping and insertion steps to ensure full insertion of the plug or screw into the blind hole or socket. This, in turn, may abrade the adjacent tissue and/or damage the bone or cartilage.


Accordingly, a need exists for an improved surgical technique and associated device for securing soft tissue to bone which allows the free sliding of the suture ends attached to a graft to ensure the positioning of the graft at an appropriate distance from the device. A fixation device and associated surgical technique that allow precise advancement and guiding of the plug or screw into the blind hole or socket are also needed.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The instruments and methods of the present invention overcome the disadvantages of the prior art, such as those noted above, by providing an eyelet implant at the distal end of a driver that securely engages and locks into a cannulated ribbed body of an interference plug or screw. The eyelet implant includes a fixed aperture for receiving a suture attached to a graft, such that the suture is able to freely slide through the aperture.


In one embodiment of the invention, suture is passed through the graft at desired points. A cannulated plug or screw is pre-loaded onto a driver provided with an eyelet implant at its distal end. Suture attached to the graft is passed through an aperture of the eyelet implant located at the distal end of the driver. The distal end of the driver together with the eyelet implant is inserted directly into the bone. The screw or plug is fully advanced into the pilot hole by tapping the interference screw or plug until the cannulated plug or screw securely engages and locks in the eyelet implant. Once the screw or plug is fully inserted and the suture is impacted into the bone, the driver is removed.


Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention, which refers to the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a distal end of a push lock driver of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of a push lock driver of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a surgical site undergoing a graft fixation technique according to a method of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of the surgical site of FIG. 3 undergoing a graft fixation technique with the push lock driver of FIGS. 1-2.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of the surgical site of FIG. 3 undergoing a graft fixation technique with the push lock driver of FIGS. 1-2 and at a stage subsequent to that shown in FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of the surgical site of FIG. 3 undergoing a graft fixation technique with the push lock driver of FIGS. 1-2 and at a stage subsequent to that shown in FIG. 5.



FIG. 7 is a schematic view of the surgical site of FIG. 3 undergoing a graft fixation technique with the push lock driver of FIGS. 1-2 and at a stage subsequent to that shown in FIG. 6.



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of an eyelet implant of the present invention secured by and locked into an interference device, and in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 9 illustrates a perspective view of a distal end of a push lock driver in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 10 illustrates a perspective view of a distal end of a push lock driver in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11 illustrates a perspective view of a distal end of a push lock driver in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 12 illustrates another perspective view of the push lock driver of FIG. 11 with a strand passed through an aperture of the push lock.



FIG. 13 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a surgical site undergoing a graft fixation technique with the push lock driver of FIGS. 11 and 12.



FIGS. 14 and 14A are schematic views of the surgical site of FIG. 13 at a graft fixation stage subsequent to that shown in FIG. 13.



FIGS. 15 and 15A are schematic views of the surgical site of FIG. 13 at a graft fixation stage subsequent to that shown in FIGS. 14 and 14A.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to the drawings, where like elements are designated by like reference numerals, FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate an implant driver 100 of the present invention. Driver 100 includes a body 4, preferably in the form of a cylinder, and having a distal end 12 (FIG. 1) and a proximal end 13 (FIG. 2). The body 4 of driver 100 includes an outer shaft 17 and an inner shaft 19. The outer shaft 17 is cannulated for receiving inner shaft 19.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, driver 100 is pre-loaded with an interference device 20. Preferably, the interference device 20 is a screw or an interference plug, preferably formed of a bioabsorbable material such as PLLA. If a screw is employed, the screw may be provided with a cannulated body provided with a continuous thread having rounded outer edges. The head of the screw may be rounded to minimize abrasion or cutting of tissue. The cannulation formed through the screw is preferably hex-shaped and accepts the correspondingly shaped inner shaft 19 of driver 100. If an interference plug is desired, the plug is provided with rounded annular ribs separated by rounded annular grooves. The outer diameter of the ribs and grooves is substantially constant. The plug tapers significantly toward the distal end. The plug also comprises a cannula, preferably hex-shaped, for accommodating the inner correspondingly shaped shaft 19 of the corresponding driver 100.


As also shown in FIG. 1, an eyelet implant 50 is provided at the distal end 12 of driver 100. The eyelet implant 50 is releasably attached to the distal end 12 of driver 100 by means of a connector 57. The eyelet implant 50 is formed of a transparent polymer material, and is preferably made of a bioabsorbable material such as PLLA, polyglycolic or polylactic acid polymers. Advantageously, the eyelet implant 50 is made of a material similar to that of the interference device 20. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the eyelet implant 50 is provided with aperture 55 for receiving a suture attached to a graft to pass through the eyelet implant 50, as described in more detail below. The width “w” (FIG. 1) of the eyelet implant 50 is about equal the diameter of the inner shaft 19 and slightly smaller than the diameter of the outer shaft 17 and of the cannula of the interference device 20.



FIG. 2 illustrates proximal end 13 of driver 100, showing a handle 15 disposed coaxially with the body 4 and outer shaft 17 and provided with handle slots or protuberances 16. As described below, handle slots or protuberances 16 allow a suture strand to be wrapped around the handle 15 and be subsequently tensioned prior to the impaction of the interference device 20 into the pilot hole. In this manner, the graft is precisely positioned at an appropriate distance from the pilot hole, and the suture with the attached graft is secured at the bottom of the pilot hole and prevented from exiting the pilot hole.


A method of a graft fixation technique according to the present invention is now described with reference to FIGS. 3-8. The present invention may be used to secure any type of soft tissue, graft, or tendon, such as, for example, a biceps tendon or a rotator cuff. FIG. 3 illustrates at least one suture 80 passed though the graft 70 at desired points. FIG. 3 also illustrates a pilot hole or socket 90 formed in the bone or cartilage 93 using a drill or punch, at the location where the tissue is to be secured. A punch provides the advantages of rounding the opening edge of the bone socket to protect the sutures 80 attached to the graft 70 from being sheared during the insertion process, and also compacts the bone at the punch site for better attachment of the bone by the anchor in cases where the bone is a soft bone.


Next, as shown in FIG. 4, driver 100 with a pre-loaded interference device 20 and with the outer shaft 17 in the retracted position is provided in the proximity of the bone socket 90. Sutures 80 attached to the graft 70 are subsequently passed through the aperture 55 of the eyelet implant 50 at the end of driver 100, as shown in FIG. 4.


Referring now to FIG. 5, driver 100 is held with gentle pressure so that the eyelet implant 50 at the distal end 12 is held at the bottom of the hole 90, keeping the interference device 20 just outside the pilot hole 90. Tension is then applied to the suture 80 by wrapping the suture 80 around the slots 16 of the handle 15 and tensioning it, as shown in FIGS. 6-7. The suture 80 freely slides through aperture 55 of the eyelet implant 50, allowing the graft 70 to be positioned close to the edge of the pilot hole 90. Once tensioning of the suture 80 has been completed, the interference device 20 is then impacted into the pilot hole 90 so that the interference device 20 advances toward the distal end 12 of driver 100 and securely engages and locks in the eyelet implant 50 with the sutures 80, as shown in FIGS. 7-8. After the interference device 20 is fully inserted, the driver is removed and the ends of the sutures can be removed by clipping them short, leaving the graft 70 securely fastened to bone 93.


A significant advantage of the present invention is that the sutures attached to the graft or the graft itself can be securely attached to the bone without the need to tie knots. Additionally, the suture attached to the graft is secured both by the eyelet implant and by the interference device, along the bottom and sidewalls of the pilot hole between the bone and the screw or plug, conferring a much stronger fixation of the graft to the bone than is achievable with prior art procedures and devices. More importantly, the suture attached to the graft is allowed to freely slide though the aperture of the eyelet implant to allow precise advancement and guiding of the plug or screw into the blind hole or socket.


In another embodiment of the present invention illustrated in FIG. 9, driver 200 is provided with a horseshoe-shaped implant 250 (i.e., an implant with an open distal end) at the distal end of the driver in lieu of the eyelet implant. The horseshoe-shaped implant 250 is provided in the form of a wedge 255 that allows the suture attached to a graft to be securely contained within the wedge, yet be capable to freely slide within the wedge. The horseshoe-shaped implant 250 is formed of a transparent polymer material, and is preferably made of a bioabsorbable material such as PLLA, polyglycolic or polylactic acid polymers. Advantageously, the horseshoe-shaped implant 250 is made of a material similar to that of the interference device 20.


The horseshoe-shaped implant 250 may be detachable from the distal end 12 of the driver 200, similar to the eyelet implant described in detail above. In this embodiment, the detachable horseshoe-shaped implant 250 is securely engaged within the cannulated ribbed body of the interference plug or screw 20. Alternatively, the horseshoe-shaped implant 250 may be integral with the distal end 12 of the driver 200 and, after the interference screw or plug 20 is fully inserted into the pilot hole, the horseshoe-shaped implant 250 is removed from the site together with the driver 200.


In yet another embodiment of the present invention and as illustrated in FIG. 10, driver 300 of the present invention is provided with a metal tubing 350 at the distal end of a driver, which in turn, is provided with a cut or pair of protuberances 355 at its most distal end to allow at least one end of a suture attached to a graft to be securely contained within the cut, yet be capable to freely slide within the cut. Preferably, the metal tubing 350 is integral with the distal end 12 of the driver 300 and, subsequent to the full insertion of the interference screw or plug 20 into the pilot hole, the metal tubing 350 is removed from the site together with the driver 300.



FIGS. 11-15 illustrate another embodiment of the present invention, according to which driver 400 is provided with a pointed tip implant 450 at the distal end of the driver, which is also an eyelet implant but which, because of its pointed tip, does not require the pre-drilling or pre-formation of a hole for fixating the device (implant with suture attached to graft) in the bone. The conical configuration of the most distal end of the pointed tip implant 450 allows the driver 400 with the attached implant to undergo a self-punching operation during graft fixation, eliminating any need to pre-drill a hole in the bone and providing increased fixation of the overall operation of securing the soft tissue. The conical configuration of the most distal end of the pointed tip implant 450 also provides suture fixation strength, as well as accelerated graft/tendon healing to bone. The pointed tip implant 450 may be detachable from the driver.


As illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12, pointed tip implant 450 is provided with an eyelet or aperture 455 for receiving at least one strand (for example, a suture strand) attached to a graft to pass through the eyelet implant 450. Pointed tip implant 450 is also provided, at its most distal end, with a conical portion 451 which allows direct advancement of the implant (by simply tapping the device with a mallet, for example) without the formation of a bone hole. Preferably, the conical portion 451 of the implant is formed of titanium or titanium alloy. In a preferred embodiment, eyelet or aperture 455 is also formed of titanium or similar material, to withstand impaction forces during the graft fixation procedure.


As in the previously-described first embodiment, strand 80 (attached to graft 70) is passed through the aperture 455 of the implant 450 at the end of the driver 400, as shown in FIGS. 11 and 12. Although FIG. 12 illustrate two strands 80 (i.e., two suture strands 80) passed through the aperture 455, the invention is not limited to this exemplary embodiment and contemplates additional embodiments wherein one strand or any number of strands are passed through the aperture 455. Preferably, at least one of the strands is formed of a high strength suture material such as FiberWire® suture, sold by Arthrex, Inc. of Naples, Fla., and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,716,234, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. The high strength suture may be available in various lengths and widths. FiberWire® suture is formed of an advanced, high-strength fiber material, namely ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), sold under the tradenames Spectra (Honeywell) and Dyneema (DSM), braided with at least one other fiber, natural or synthetic, to form lengths of suture material. The preferred FiberWire® suture includes a core within a hollow braided construct, the core being a twisted yarn of UHMWPE. The suture may optionally include filaments of various colors.


An exemplary method of graft fixation using the pointed tip implant 450 of the present invention is illustrated with reference to FIGS. 13-15. This exemplary method illustrated in FIGS. 13-15 relates to a specific graft fixation technique (i.e., SutureBridge Lateral Row fixation); however, the invention is not limited to this exemplary embodiment and applies to any other method of soft tissue fixation known in the art.


Referring to FIG. 13, an Arthrex SutureBridge® medial row is completed as known in the art and the strands 80 (suture strands 80) are threaded through the titanium eyelet 455. As shown in FIG. 14A, a protective cap 94 (or other device that prevents anchor deployment) is malleted to advance the PushLock® until the anchor contacts bone 93. The suture is then tensioned, as shown in FIG. 14. The protective cap 94 is subsequently removed (FIG. 15A) and the plug 420 is malleted until a mark (for example, a predefined laser line) is flush with the bone (FIG. 15). The ribbed, spiked configuration of plug 420 facilitates the insertion of the device 400 into the bone by simply exerting force upon the device, without the need to drill or form a hole in the bone.


Although the above embodiments have been described with reference to an implant, such as eyelet implant 50, 450 (FIGS. 1 and 11) or horseshoe-shaped implant 250 (FIG. 9), for example, having an aperture of a predefined configuration (i.e., eyelet or horseshoe configuration), it should be understood that the invention is not limited to these embodiments. Accordingly, the present invention also contemplates implants affixed to or detachable from a preloaded driver and having an aperture of any configuration or geometrical shape, as long as it captures suture and allows the captured suture to freely slide within the aperture.


Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is preferred, therefore, that the present invention be limited not by the specific disclosure herein, but only by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of soft tissue repair, comprising the steps of: attaching at least one suture to a soft tissue to be affixed at a bone location, the bone location having a hole;feeding the suture through an aperture of an implant, the implant being releasably attached to a driver at a distal end of the driver, while an interference device that is cannulated is preloaded on a shaft of the driver in a configuration where the entire interference device and the entire implant are completely spaced apart from one another by the driver;inserting the suture and the implant into the hole by inserting the distal end of the driver into the hole;pulling on one end of the suture to draw the suture through the aperture of the implant such that the soft tissue is drawn toward the hole;inserting the interference device into the hole so that the interference device is advanced distally toward the implant to secure the suture in the hole between the interference device and the bone such that a proximal end of the interference device is within the hole; andreleasing the attachment between the implant and the driver and removing the driver from the hole while the implant and the interference device remain implanted in the hole.
  • 2. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the interference device is a screw.
  • 3. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the interference device is a plug.
  • 4. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the aperture has an eyelet configuration.
  • 5. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the aperture has a horseshoe-shaped configuration.
  • 6. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the aperture is provided with at least one protuberance at its distal end.
  • 7. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the driver includes an outer shaft disposed around an inner shaft and movable between a proximal position and a distal position along the inner shaft, and wherein the interference device is preloaded onto the inner shaft by inserting the inner shaft through a cannula of the interference device with the outer shaft retracted to the proximal position so that the proximal end of the interference device abuts the distal end of the outer shaft.
  • 8. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 7, wherein the interference device is a screw having a hex-shaped cannula and at least a portion of the implant at the distal end of the driver is hex-shaped to be matingly insertable into the hex-shaped cannula of the screw.
  • 9. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the soft tissue is drawn into the hole by pulling on the suture, and the interference device secures the suture and the soft tissue in the hole.
  • 10. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the interference device is inserted into the hole by impaction.
  • 11. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the interference device has a cannulated body with a closed annular cross-section extending continuously from a proximal end thereof to a distal end thereof.
  • 12. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein the entire interference device is configured to be advanced toward the implant without expanding.
  • 13. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein when the suture and the implant are inserted into the hole, the distal end of the driver is positionable in the hole while the entire interference device remains outside of the hole.
  • 14. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein when the suture is fed through the aperture of the implant, the suture extends proximally from the implant around an outside of the interference device.
  • 15. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 1, wherein when the implant is attached to the distal end of the driver, at least part of the implant extends distally from a distalmost portion of the driver.
  • 16. A method of soft tissue repair, comprising the steps of: providing a hole in a bone at a location at which a soft tissue is to be affixed;attaching at least one suture to the soft tissue to be affixed;capturing the suture attached to the soft tissue by feeding the suture through an aperture of an implant, the implant being releasably attached at a distal end of a driver, wherein an interference device that is cannulated is preloaded on a shaft of the driver;inserting the suture into the hole by inserting the distal end of the driver into the hole;pulling on one end of the suture to draw the suture through the aperture of the implant such that the soft tissue attached to the suture is drawn toward the hole; andinserting the interference device into the hole so that the interference device is advanced toward the implant to secure the suture in the hole,wherein the interference device is a screw having a hex-shaped cannula and at least a portion of the distal end of the driver is hex-shaped to be matingly insertable into the hex-shaped cannula of the screw.
  • 17. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the aperture has an eyelet configuration.
  • 18. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the aperture has a horseshoe-shaped configuration.
  • 19. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the aperture is provided with at least one protuberance at its distal end.
  • 20. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the driver includes an outer shaft disposed around an inner shaft and movable between a proximal position and a distal position along the inner shaft, and wherein the interference device is preloaded onto the inner shaft by inserting the inner shaft through a cannula of the interference device with the outer shaft retracted to the proximal position so that the proximal end of the interference device abuts the distal end of the outer shaft.
  • 21. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the interference device is inserted into the hole by impaction.
  • 22. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the interference device has a cannulated body with a closed annular cross-section extending continuously from a proximal end thereof to a distal end thereof.
  • 23. The method of soft tissue repair according to claim 16, wherein the interference device is advanced toward the implant without expanding the interference device.
  • 24. A method of soft tissue repair, comprising the steps of: attaching at least one suture to a soft tissue to be affixed at a bone location, the bone location having a hole;feeding the suture through an aperture of an implant, the implant being releasably attached to a driver at a distal end of the driver, while an interference device that is cannulated is preloaded on a shaft of the driver in a configuration where the entire interference device and the entire implant are completely spaced apart from one another by the driver;inserting the suture and the implant into the hole by inserting the distal end of the driver into the hole;pulling on one end of the suture to draw the suture through the aperture of the implant such that the soft tissue is drawn toward the hole; andinserting and advancing the interference device distally into the hole toward the implant while the implant is held at a same axial position in the hole to secure the suture in the hole between the interference device and the bone such that a proximal end of the interference device is within the hole.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/765,218, filed Feb. 12, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/182,893, filed Jul. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,430,909, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/022,868, filed Jan. 30, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,993,369, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/405,707, filed Apr. 3, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/886,280, filed Jun. 22, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,544,281, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/213,263, filed Jun. 22, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (385)
Number Name Date Kind
2121193 Hanicke Jun 1938 A
2329398 Duffy Sep 1943 A
2381050 Hardinge Aug 1945 A
2472103 Giesen Jun 1949 A
2490364 Livingston Dec 1949 A
2562419 Ferris Jul 1951 A
2570465 Lundholm Oct 1951 A
2699774 Livingston Jan 1955 A
2787186 Antonin Apr 1957 A
3143916 Rice Aug 1964 A
3575080 Hannay Apr 1971 A
3584667 Reiland Jun 1971 A
3664400 Moore May 1972 A
3716058 Tanner, Jr. Feb 1973 A
3768635 Eggert Oct 1973 A
3842825 Wagner Oct 1974 A
3910281 Kletschka et al. Oct 1975 A
3951261 Mandel Apr 1976 A
3990438 Pritchard Nov 1976 A
4006747 Kronenthal Feb 1977 A
4013071 Rosenberg et al. Mar 1977 A
4135623 Thyen Jan 1979 A
4244370 Furlow et al. Jan 1981 A
4275717 Bolesky et al. Jun 1981 A
4301551 Dore et al. Nov 1981 A
4351069 Ballintyn et al. Sep 1982 A
4406623 Grafelmann et al. Sep 1983 A
4424898 Thyen et al. Jan 1984 A
4454875 Pratt et al. Jun 1984 A
4467478 Jurgutis et al. Aug 1984 A
4483023 Hoffman, Jr. et al. Nov 1984 A
4507817 Staffeld Apr 1985 A
4519100 Wills et al. May 1985 A
4520511 Gianezio et al. Jun 1985 A
4537185 Stednitz Aug 1985 A
4539981 Tunc Sep 1985 A
4569338 Edwards Feb 1986 A
4590928 Hunt et al. May 1986 A
4597776 Ullman et al. Jul 1986 A
4601625 Emst et al. Jul 1986 A
4605414 Czajka et al. Aug 1986 A
4632100 Goble et al. Dec 1986 A
4633869 Schmieding et al. Jan 1987 A
4640271 Lower et al. Feb 1987 A
4672957 Hourahane Jun 1987 A
4712542 Daniel et al. Dec 1987 A
4723541 Reese Feb 1988 A
4738255 Goble et al. Apr 1988 A
4741330 Hayhurst et al. May 1988 A
4750492 Jacobs et al. Jun 1988 A
4784126 Hourahane Nov 1988 A
4870957 Goble et al. Oct 1989 A
4892429 Giannuzzi Jan 1990 A
4898156 Gatturna et al. Feb 1990 A
4946467 Ohi et al. Aug 1990 A
4946468 Li Sep 1990 A
4961741 Hayhurst Oct 1990 A
4963144 Huene Oct 1990 A
4976715 Bays et al. Dec 1990 A
4988351 Paulos et al. Jan 1991 A
5002550 Li Mar 1991 A
5019079 Ross May 1991 A
5037422 Hayhurst et al. Aug 1991 A
5041129 Hayhurt et al. Aug 1991 A
5047030 Draenert Sep 1991 A
5078731 Hayhurst Jan 1992 A
5084050 Draenert Jan 1992 A
5100415 Hayhurst Mar 1992 A
5100417 Cerier et al. Mar 1992 A
5100471 Winnik et al. Mar 1992 A
5102421 Anspach, Jr. Apr 1992 A
5108399 Eitenmuller et al. Apr 1992 A
5116337 Johnson May 1992 A
5120171 Lasner Jun 1992 A
5129904 Illi Jul 1992 A
5139499 Small et al. Aug 1992 A
5139520 Rosenberg Aug 1992 A
5141520 Goble et al. Aug 1992 A
5152790 Rosenberg et al. Oct 1992 A
5156616 Meadows et al. Oct 1992 A
D330951 Kamata Nov 1992 S
D331463 Rosenberg et al. Dec 1992 S
5176682 Chow et al. Jan 1993 A
5207679 Li May 1993 A
5211647 Schmieding May 1993 A
5217486 Rice et al. Jun 1993 A
5224946 Hayhurst et al. Jul 1993 A
5236431 Gogolewski et al. Aug 1993 A
5236445 Hayhurst et al. Aug 1993 A
5246441 Ross et al. Sep 1993 A
5258016 Dipoto et al. Nov 1993 A
5261914 Warren Nov 1993 A
5268001 Nicholson et al. Dec 1993 A
5269809 Hayhurst et al. Dec 1993 A
5275176 Chandler Jan 1994 A
5285016 Narizuka et al. Feb 1994 A
5312438 Johnson May 1994 A
5320626 Schmieding Jun 1994 A
5324308 Pierce Jun 1994 A
5330468 Burkhart Jul 1994 A
5336240 Metzler et al. Aug 1994 A
5350383 Schmieding et al. Sep 1994 A
5354298 Lee et al. Oct 1994 A
5356435 Thein et al. Oct 1994 A
5360448 Thramann Nov 1994 A
5364400 Rego, Jr. et al. Nov 1994 A
5370662 Stone et al. Dec 1994 A
5375956 Pennig Dec 1994 A
5376119 Zimmermann et al. Dec 1994 A
5380334 Torrie et al. Jan 1995 A
5383905 Golds Jan 1995 A
D357534 Hayes Apr 1995 S
5403136 Mathys et al. Apr 1995 A
5411523 Goble May 1995 A
5417533 Lasner May 1995 A
5417691 Hayhurst May 1995 A
D359557 Hayes Jun 1995 S
5423860 Lizardi et al. Jun 1995 A
5441502 Bartlett et al. Aug 1995 A
5441508 Gazielly et al. Aug 1995 A
5443482 Stone et al. Aug 1995 A
5456685 Huebner Oct 1995 A
5464427 Curtis et al. Nov 1995 A
5466243 Schmieding et al. Nov 1995 A
5470334 Ross et al. Nov 1995 A
5474572 Hayhurst Dec 1995 A
5486197 Le et al. Jan 1996 A
5496348 Bonutti Mar 1996 A
5501695 Anspach et al. Mar 1996 A
5501696 Trott et al. Mar 1996 A
5520692 Ferrante et al. May 1996 A
5522843 Zang Jun 1996 A
5522844 Johnson Jun 1996 A
5527342 Pietrzak et al. Jun 1996 A
5534011 Greene et al. Jul 1996 A
5540718 Bartlett Jul 1996 A
5545180 Le et al. Aug 1996 A
5562664 Durlacher et al. Oct 1996 A
5569305 Bonutti et al. Oct 1996 A
5569306 Thal Oct 1996 A
5573547 Leveen et al. Nov 1996 A
5573548 Nazre et al. Nov 1996 A
5575801 Habermeyer et al. Nov 1996 A
5575819 Amis et al. Nov 1996 A
5578057 Wenstrom Nov 1996 A
5584695 Lal Sachdeva et al. Dec 1996 A
5584835 Greenfield et al. Dec 1996 A
5584839 Gieringer Dec 1996 A
5591207 Coleman Jan 1997 A
5593425 Bonutti et al. Jan 1997 A
5601557 Hayhurst et al. Feb 1997 A
5607432 Fucci Mar 1997 A
5618314 Harwin et al. Apr 1997 A
5624446 Harryman, II Apr 1997 A
5626613 Schmieding May 1997 A
5628766 Johnson May 1997 A
5634926 Jobe et al. Jun 1997 A
5643273 Clark Jul 1997 A
5643320 Lower et al. Jul 1997 A
5643321 McDevitt Jul 1997 A
5645545 Bryant Jul 1997 A
5645547 Coleman et al. Jul 1997 A
5645589 Li Jul 1997 A
5647874 Hayhurst et al. Jul 1997 A
5649963 McDevitt Jul 1997 A
5658313 Thal Aug 1997 A
5662658 Wenstrom, Jr. Sep 1997 A
5665112 Thal Sep 1997 A
5667509 Westin et al. Sep 1997 A
D385352 Bales et al. Oct 1997 S
5681318 Pennig et al. Oct 1997 A
5681333 Burkhart et al. Oct 1997 A
5683401 Schmieding et al. Nov 1997 A
5683419 Thal Nov 1997 A
5685313 Mayevsky Nov 1997 A
5690649 Li Nov 1997 A
5690676 Dipoto et al. Nov 1997 A
5690677 Schmieding et al. Nov 1997 A
5697950 Fucci et al. Dec 1997 A
5702397 Goble et al. Dec 1997 A
5702398 Tarabishy Dec 1997 A
5707394 Miller et al. Jan 1998 A
5707395 Li Jan 1998 A
5709708 Thal et al. Jan 1998 A
5720765 Thal Feb 1998 A
5720766 Zang et al. Feb 1998 A
5725529 Nicholson et al. Mar 1998 A
5725541 Anspach, III et al. Mar 1998 A
5728136 Thal Mar 1998 A
5733307 Dinsdale Mar 1998 A
5741300 Li Apr 1998 A
5749878 Bracy et al. May 1998 A
5755721 Hearn May 1998 A
5782864 Lizardi Jul 1998 A
5782865 Grotz Jul 1998 A
5792142 Galitzer Aug 1998 A
5797963 McDevitt Aug 1998 A
5791899 Sachdeva et al. Sep 1998 A
5810854 Beach Sep 1998 A
5814070 Borzone et al. Sep 1998 A
5814071 McDevitt et al. Sep 1998 A
5814073 Bonutti Sep 1998 A
5824011 Stone et al. Oct 1998 A
5827285 Bramlet Oct 1998 A
5827291 Fucci et al. Oct 1998 A
5843087 Jensen et al. Dec 1998 A
5843127 Li Dec 1998 A
5860978 McDevitt et al. Jan 1999 A
5860983 Wenstrom, Jr. Jan 1999 A
5868762 Cragg et al. Feb 1999 A
5868789 Huebner Feb 1999 A
5879372 Bartlett et al. Mar 1999 A
5891146 Simon Apr 1999 A
5891168 Thal et al. Apr 1999 A
5893850 Cachia et al. Apr 1999 A
5899920 DeSatnick et al. May 1999 A
5902321 Caspari et al. May 1999 A
5904704 Goble et al. May 1999 A
5906624 Wenstrom, Jr. May 1999 A
5911721 Nicholson Jun 1999 A
5931844 Thompson et al. Aug 1999 A
5935129 McDevitt Aug 1999 A
5944739 Zlock Aug 1999 A
5946326 Rinne Aug 1999 A
5948000 Larsen et al. Sep 1999 A
5948001 Larsen et al. Sep 1999 A
5951559 Burkhart Sep 1999 A
5957953 DiPoto Sep 1999 A
5964764 West et al. Oct 1999 A
5964783 Grafton et al. Oct 1999 A
5968044 Nicholson et al. Oct 1999 A
5980558 Wiley et al. Nov 1999 A
5993451 Burkhart Nov 1999 A
5993459 Larsen et al. Nov 1999 A
6007567 Bonutti Dec 1999 A
6013083 Bennett Jan 2000 A
6022373 Li Feb 2000 A
6024758 Thal et al. Feb 2000 A
6027523 Schmieding Feb 2000 A
6030162 Huebner Feb 2000 A
6036694 Goble et al. Mar 2000 A
6045554 Grooms Apr 2000 A
6045573 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Apr 2000 A
6045574 Thal et al. Apr 2000 A
6056751 Fenton et al. May 2000 A
6083522 Chu et al. Jul 2000 A
6086608 Ek et al. Jul 2000 A
6096041 Gellman et al. Aug 2000 A
6099547 Gellman et al. Aug 2000 A
6117162 Schmieding et al. Sep 2000 A
6129762 Li Oct 2000 A
6143017 Thal Nov 2000 A
6149669 Li Nov 2000 A
6156039 Thal Dec 2000 A
6159235 Kim Dec 2000 A
6200329 Fung et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214031 Schmieding et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221107 Steiner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231592 Bonutti et al. May 2001 B1
6267766 Burkhart Jul 2001 B1
6280474 Cassidy et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287324 Yarnitsky et al. Sep 2001 B1
6319270 Grafton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6355053 Li Mar 2002 B1
6368322 Luks et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368326 Dakin Apr 2002 B1
6387129 Rieser et al. May 2002 B2
6436142 Paes et al. Aug 2002 B1
RE37963 Thal Jan 2003 E
6517542 Papay et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517564 Grafton et al. Feb 2003 B1
6520980 Foerster Feb 2003 B1
6524317 Ritchart et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527794 McDevitt et al. Mar 2003 B1
6527795 Lizardi Mar 2003 B1
6540750 Burkhart Apr 2003 B2
6544281 ElAttrache Apr 2003 B2
6551330 Bain et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558389 Clark et al. May 2003 B2
6562044 Cooper May 2003 B1
6585730 Foerster Jul 2003 B1
6592609 Bonutti Jul 2003 B1
6635074 Bartlett Oct 2003 B2
6641596 Lizardi et al. Nov 2003 B1
6641597 Burkhart et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648903 Pierson Nov 2003 B1
6652561 Tran Nov 2003 B1
6656183 Colleran et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660008 Foerster et al. Dec 2003 B1
6660023 McDevitt et al. Dec 2003 B2
6673094 McDevitt et al. Jan 2004 B1
6692516 West, Jr. et al. Feb 2004 B2
6770076 Foerster Aug 2004 B2
6770084 Bain et al. Aug 2004 B1
6780198 Gregoire et al. Aug 2004 B1
6818010 Eichhorn et al. Nov 2004 B2
6840953 Martinek Jan 2005 B2
6857520 Salazar et al. Feb 2005 B2
7037324 Martinek May 2006 B2
7081126 McDevitt et al. Jul 2006 B2
7083638 Foerster Aug 2006 B2
7090690 Foerster et al. Aug 2006 B2
7204839 Dreyfuss et al. Apr 2007 B2
7211088 Grafton et al. May 2007 B2
7247164 Ritchart et al. Jul 2007 B1
7322978 West, Jr. Jan 2008 B2
7329272 Burkhart Feb 2008 B2
7491217 Hendren et al. Feb 2009 B1
7517357 Abrams et al. Apr 2009 B2
7556640 Foerster Jul 2009 B2
7637949 Hart Dec 2009 B2
7651495 McDevitt et al. Jan 2010 B2
7695494 Foerster Apr 2010 B2
7695495 Dreyfuss Apr 2010 B2
7713285 Stone et al. May 2010 B1
7780701 Meridew et al. Aug 2010 B1
7785347 Harvie et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803173 Burkhart et al. Sep 2010 B2
7828820 Stone et al. Nov 2010 B2
7867251 Colleran et al. Jan 2011 B2
7887551 Bojarski et al. Feb 2011 B2
7959649 Burhkart Jun 2011 B2
7976565 Meridew Jul 2011 B1
7981140 Burkhart Jul 2011 B2
7993369 Dreyfuss Aug 2011 B2
8105343 White et al. Jan 2012 B2
8133258 Foerster et al. Mar 2012 B2
8137381 Foerster et al. Mar 2012 B2
8317829 Foerster et al. Nov 2012 B2
8430909 Dreyfuss Apr 2013 B2
8444672 Foerster May 2013 B2
8696703 Anspach, III et al. Apr 2014 B2
8764797 Dreyfuss et al. Jul 2014 B2
9706986 ElAttrache Jul 2017 B2
20020013608 ElAttrache et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020052629 Morgan et al. May 2002 A1
20020111653 Foerster Aug 2002 A1
20020128684 Foerster Sep 2002 A1
20020188305 Foerster et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004545 Burkhart et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030065332 TenHuisen Apr 2003 A1
20030065361 Dreyfuss Apr 2003 A1
20030069604 Schmieding et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030144696 Sinnott et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149448 Foerster et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030187444 Overaker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191498 Foerster et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195563 Foerster Oct 2003 A1
20040030354 Leung et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040093031 Burkhart et al. May 2004 A1
20040106950 Grafton et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138683 Shelton Jul 2004 A1
20040138706 Abrams et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040267316 Powell et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050222618 Dreyfuss et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245932 Fanton et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050277986 Foerster et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283156 Schmieding et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004364 Green et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060074434 Wenstrom et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079904 Thal Apr 2006 A1
20060100630 West May 2006 A1
20060235413 Denham et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060271060 Gordon Nov 2006 A1
20070142838 Jordan Jun 2007 A1
20070156148 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156149 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156150 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156176 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070191849 ElAttrache et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225719 Stone et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070255317 Fanton et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260259 Fanton et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080004659 Burkhart et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090187216 Schmieding et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090281581 Berg Nov 2009 A1
20090287259 Trenhaile Nov 2009 A1
20100248888 Hamperl Sep 2010 A1
20100249854 Thomas Sep 2010 A1
20110015674 Howard et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110106252 Barwood May 2011 A1
20130150885 Dreyfuss Jun 2013 A1
20130158597 Hernandez Jun 2013 A1
20130345750 Sullivan Dec 2013 A1
20140364906 Palese Dec 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
2045903 Nov 2001 CA
0574707 Dec 1993 EP
0686373 Dec 1995 EP
1016377 Apr 2006 EP
1797826 Dec 2009 EP
2622430 May 1989 FR
2717070 Sep 1995 FR
1600713 Oct 1990 SU
WO 9516398 Jun 1995 WO
WO 9522930 Aug 1995 WO
WO 9614798 May 1996 WO
WO 9937217 Jul 1999 WO
WO 0110312 Feb 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (124)
Entry
Arthrex, Inc., “PushLock SP”, screenprints, pp. 1/8 to 8/8 and animations, Oct. 15, 2007. http://www.arthrex.com/resources/animation/sjjil.fkEEeCRTQBQVoRHOw/pushlock-sp.
Wikipedia, Wikipedia “Osseointegration” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osseonintegration.
Acufex ACL Reconstructions, SNN0021768-SN0021769, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Ahmad, et al., Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis, Orthopedic Clinics of North America 34 (2003) 499-506; SNN0021244-SNN0021251, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Lo, et al., “Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis: Indications and Technique,” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 10, No. 2 Apr. 2002; pp. 105-112; SNN0021269-SNN0021276; Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Richards, et al., “Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis With Interference Screw Fixation: The Lateral Decubitus Position,” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 11, No. 1 Jan. 2003; pp. 15-23; SNN0021289-SNN0021291, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
McGuire, “The Bioscrew Fixation System, Surgical Technique,” 1995 Linvatec Corporation; SNN0020665-SNN0020666, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Weiler., et al., “Hamstring Tendon Fixation Using Interference Screws: A Biomechanical Study in Calif Fibial Bone”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 14, No. 1 Jan.-Feb. 1998; pp. 29-37; SNN0020823-SNN0020831, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Snyder, “The Min-Revo Labral, Repair System, Surgical Technique,” 1994 Linvatec Corporation; SNN0020512-SNN0020513, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Mazzocca, et al., “Single Incision Technique Using an Interference Screw for the Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures,” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 11, No. 1 Jan. 2003, pp. 36-41; SNN0021277-SNN0021282, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, “Arthroscopic Repair of a Bankart Lesion Using Tag® Suture Anchors,” SNN0020454-SN0020465, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP.
Smith & Nephew 1997 Products Catalog, SNN0021521-SNN021522, Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-CV-1047-RSP.
The Complete Arthrex Information System; ESP_Expanding_Suture_Plug_Insertion_Guide; 11 pages.
“The AutoCuffTM System,” Optus Medical, 2003.
Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 2, 2016, 72 pages.
Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-1.
Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al. v Arthrex, Inc., Case IPR2017-00275, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907, Patent Owner Arthrex, Inc.'s Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.120 dated Aug. 18, 2017.
Disclaimer in Patent Under 37 CFR 1.321(a), U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907, dated Feb. 28, 2017 (Arthrex Exhibit 2001, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR2017-00275).
Declaration of Dr. Geoffrey B. Higgs dated Aug. 18, 2017 (Arthrex Exhibit 2037, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR2017-00275).
Excerpt of 1999 Oxford Dictionary (Arthrex Exhibit 2009, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR2017-00275).
Arthrex Bio-Corkscrew Suture Anchor Brochure (2000) (Arthrex Exhibit 2014, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR2017-00275).
Arthrex Corkscrew Rotator Cuff Repair Technique Guide (1998) (Arthrex Exhibit 2017, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR2017-00275).
Transcript of Jul. 21, 2017, Deposition of Dr. David McAllister (Arthrex Exhibit 2022, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR2017-00275).
US Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Case No. IPR2017-00275, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907B2, Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al. v Arthrex, Inc., Paper 7, Entered May 10, 2017, “Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, 37 C.F.R. § 42.108”.
Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strengths of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2011 Update, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 27, No. 7 Jul. 2011: pp. 895-905.
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Suture Anchor Properties, Modes of Failure and Technical Considerations, By: Richard Ma, et al., Expert Rev. Med. Devices 8(3), 377-387 (2011).
Applications of Polyetheretherketone in Trauma, Arthroscopy, and Cranial Defect Repair, By: Scott Lovald Ph.D., and Steven M. Kurtz, Ph.D., Chapter 15, PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4377-4463.7.10015-6, Copyright 2012 Elsevier Inc, pp. 243-259.
The Evolution of Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, By: Patrick J. Denard, M.D. and Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 29, No. 9 Sep. 2013; pp. 1589-1595.
The Autocuff System, Opus Medical, four pages, Copyright 2003, www.opusmedical.com.
Current Concept of Rotator Cuff Repair, By: Stephen S. Burkhart and Wesley M. Nottage, Chapter 4, pp. 81-88.
501(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, By: Carol A. Weideman, Ph.D., six pages, Linvatek, Mar. 21, 1997.
501(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, one page, DePuy, Inc., Feb. 6, 1997.
Failure of Suture Material at Suture Anchor Eyelets, By: Dominik C. Meyer, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 18, No. 9 Nov.-Dec. 2002; pp. 1013-1019.
Arthroscopic Management of Partial, Full-Thickness, and Complex Rotator Cuff Tears: Indications, Techniques, and Complications, By: Eric S. Millstein, M.D., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 19, No. 10 (December, Suppl 1), 2003: pp. 189-199.
Suture Anchor Failure Strength—an In Vivo Study, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy, vol. 9, No. 6, 1993.
Sutures and Suture Anchors: Update 2003, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 19, No. 9 Nov. 2003: pp. 985-990.
Sutures and Suture Anchors—Update 2006, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 22, No. 10 Oct. 2006; pp. 1063-1069.
Arthrex Is Reaching New Heights in Rotator Cuff Repair, eight pages, Copyright Arthrex, Inc., 2007.
Biodegradable Shoulder Anchors Have Unique Modes of Failure, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 23, No. 3 Mar. 2007; pp. 316-320.
Practical Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy, By: Donald H. Johnson, MD, FRCS, et al., 2007 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Klewer business, Chapter 20: Thermal Treatment, Sutures, Knots and Bone Anchors, pp. 303-305.
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery, A Practical Approach to Management, By: Jeffrey S. Abrams and Robert H. Bell, ISBN: 978-0-387-39340-7.
Suture Anchor Materials, Eyelets, and Designs: Update 2008, By: F. Alan Barber, MD, et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 24, No. 8 Aug. 2008: pp. 859-867.
Biomechanical Stability of Knotless Suture Anchors Used in Rotator Cuff Repair in Healthy and Osteopenic Bone, By: Matthias F. Pietschmann, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 26, No. 8 Aug. 2010: pp. 1035-1044.
Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears, A Biomechanical Comparison of Suture Versus Bone Anchor Techniques, By: Stephen C. Reed, et al., The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 46-48.
Fixation Strength of Rotator Cuff Repairs With Suture Anchors and the Transosseous Suture Technique, By: David V. Craft, MD, et al., 1996 by Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees, pp. 32-40.
Suture Anchor Strength Revisited, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 12, No. 1 Feb. 1996; pp. 32-38.
Technique of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Implantable 4-MM Revo Suture Anchors, Suture Shuttle Relays, and No. 2 Nonabsorbable Mattress Sutures, By: Stephen J. Snyder, MD, The Rotator Cuff, Part II, vol. 28, No. 2, Apr. 1997, pp. 267-275.
Internal Fixation Strength of Suture Anchors—Update 1997, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 3 Jun. 1997; pp. 355-362.
Cyclic Loading of Anchor-Based Rotator Cuff Repairs: Confirmation of the Tension Overload Phenomenon and Comparison of Suture Anchor Fixation With Transosseous Fixation, By: Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 6 Dec. 1997; pp. 720-724.
Suture Anchors—Update 1999, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D. and Morley A. Herbert, PhD., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 15, No. 7 Oct. 1999; pp. 719-725.
Evaluation of a High Density Polyethylene Fixing System for Hydroxyapatite Ceramic Implants, By: Ichiro Ono, et al., Biomaterials 21 (2000) 143-151.
Knotless Suture Anchor, Arthroscopic Bankard Repair Without Tying Knots, by: Raymond Thal, MD, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 390, pp. 42-51.
Bioknotless Anchor, Mitek Products.
Fatigue Testing of Suture Anchors, By: Stefan Rupp, MD, et al., The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 30, No. 2, 2002, pp. 239-247.
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Suture Anchors, By: Eugene M. Wolf, MD, et al., Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, vol. 1, No. 2 (April), 191; pp. 184-191.
Repairs of the Rotator Cuff, Correlation of Functional Results with Integrity of the Cuff, By: Douglas T. Harryman II, M.D., et al., from the Shoulder and Elbow Service, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle; Copyright 1991 by the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated, pp. 982-989.
Modification of the Bankart Reconstruction With a Suture Anchor, By: John C. Richmond, M.D., et al., The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 19, No. 4, 1991 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, pp. 343-346.
Slap Lesions in Association With Complete Tears of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: A Report of Two Cases, By: Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., and David L. Fox, M.D., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 8(1):31-35, Published by Raven Press, Ltd. @1992 Arthroscopy Association of North America.
Pull-Out Strength of Suture Anchors for Rotator Cuff and Bankart Lesion Repairs, By: Aaron T. Hecker, MS, et al., The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 21, No. 6, @1993 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, pp. 874-879.
Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair Using Suture Anchors, By: Eugene M. Wolf, MD; from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 1993; pp. 59-69.
Mechanical Strength of Repairs of the Rotator Cuff, By: Christian Gerber, et al., From the Hopital Cantonal, Fribourg, the University of Berne and the AO Research Institute, Davos, Switzerland, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 76-B, No. 3, May 1994; pp. 371-380.
Partial Repair of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears, By: Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Arthroscopy, vol. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 363-370.
The In Vivo Histology of an Absorbable Suture Anchor: A Preliminary Report, By; A. Alan Barber, M.D. and Michael A. Deck, M.D., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 1 Feb. 1995; pp. 77-81.
The Deadman Theory of Suture Anchors: Observations Along a South Texas Fence Line, By: Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 1 Feb. 1995; pp. 119-123.
The Ultimate Strength of Suture Anchors, By: F. Alan Barber, M.D., et al., Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 1 Feb. 1995; pp. 21-28.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-14.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-15.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-16.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-17.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-18.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-19.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-20.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-21.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-22.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-23.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-24.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-3.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-4.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-5.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-6.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-7.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-8.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-9.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-10.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-11.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-12.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-13.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Smith & Nephew, Inc. & Arthrocare Corporation v Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR201700275, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907; Declaration of Dr. David R. McAllister dated Nov. 13, 2016, 127 pages. (S&N Exhibit 1019; S&N v Arthrex).
Correspondence to Mr. Mark Ritchart, President and CEO, Opus Medical, Inc., from Celia Witten, M.D., Director, Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices, Department of Health & Human Services, dated Sep. 17, 2001; 3 pages (S&N Exhibit 1016; S&N v Arthrex).
Mitek Products, 510(k) Summary for K974345 dated Feb. 13, 1998, 5 pages (S&N Exhibit 1015; S&N v Arthrex).
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Smith & Nephew, Inc. & Arthrocare Corporation v Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR201700275, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907; Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-19 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.1 et seq., dated Nov. 15, 2016, 75 pages.
Barber, et al.; Suture Anchors—Update 1999; Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 15, No. 7 Oct. 1999; pp. 719-725 (S&N Exhibit 1025; S&N v. Arthrex).
Barber, et al.; Suture Anchor Strength Revisited; Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 12, No. 1 Feb. 1996; pp. 32-38 (S&N Exhibit 1024; S&N v. Arthrex).
Barber, et al.; Suture Anchor Failure Strength—An In Vivo Study; Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 9(6):647-652; Published by Raven Press, Ltd., 1993 Arthroscopy Association of North America (S&N Exhibit 1023; S&N v. Arthrex).
Parisien, “Current Techniques in Arthroscopy,” Third Edition, 1998, 19 pages.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-1.
Arthrex v. S&N, 2:15-cv-1047-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,329,272—Ex I-2.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-2.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-4.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-6.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-7.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-9.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-11.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-14.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-16.
Arthrex v Smith & Nephew, 2:15-cv-1756-RSP, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907 dated Mar. 4, 2016, Exhibit M-17.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Smith & Nephew, Inc. & Arthrocare Corporation v Arthrex, Inc., Case IPR2017-00275, U.S. Pat. No. 9,179,907; Patent Owner Arthrex, Inc.'s Preliminary Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.107.
Hecker, et al.; Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs; The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 21, No. 6, 1993 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; pp. 874-879 (S&N Exhibit 1022; S&N v. Arthrex).
CanMed Orthopedi “Artroskopi Katagorisindeki Videolar” http://www.canmedortopedi.com/tr/videolar.html.
Meeks & Zilberarb Orthopedis., “Patent Education” 2007. http://www.mzortho.com/pted/videos.htm.
Wikipedia, “Wikipedia Osseointegration” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osseointegration.
Philip Bacilla, et al., “Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in a High Demand Patient Population,” Arthroscope: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 1 Feb. 1997, pp. 51-60.
Laurence D. Higgins, et al., “Athroscopic Bankart Repair, Operative Technique and Surgical Pitfalls,” Management of the Unstable Shoulder: Arthroscopic Approaches for the Next Millennium, Clinics in Sports Medicine, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 2000.
Brian J. Cole, et al., “Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization With Suture Anchors; Technique, Technology, and Pitfalls,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 390, Sep. 2001, pp. 17-30.
F. Alan Barber, et al., “Internal Fixation Strength of Suture Anchors—Updated 1997,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 3 Jun. 1997: pp. 355-362.
Rudy Robbe, et al., “Knotless Suture-Based Anchors,” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 12:221-224 @ 2004 Elsevier Inc.
Raymond Thal, “Knotless Suture Anchor—Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Without Tying Knots,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 390, pp. 42-51 @2001 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Inc.
Robert L. Waltrip, et al., “Rotator Cuff Repair; A Biomechanical Comparison of Three Techniques,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, pp. 493-497, http://ajs.sagepub.com.
Edward Yian, et al., “Arthroscopic Repair of Slap Lesions With a Bioknotless Suture Anchor,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 5 May-Jun. 2004: pp. 547-551.
Matthias Zumstein, et al., “In Vitro Comparison of Standard and Knotless Metal Suture Anchors,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 5 May-Jun. 2004: pp. 517-520.
Michael S. George, et al., “Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair,” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine 12:210-214 @ 2004 Elsevier Inc.
Maria Apreleva, et al., “Rotator Cuff Tears: The Effect of the Reconstruction Method on Three-Dimensional Repair Site Area,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 18, No. 5 May-Jun. 2002: pp. 519-526.
Peter J. Millett, et al., “Mattress Double Anchor Footprint Repair: A Novel, Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Technique,” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 8 Oct. 2004: pp. 875-879.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180235599 A1 Aug 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60213263 Jun 2000 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13182893 Jul 2011 US
Child 13765218 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13765218 Feb 2013 US
Child 15958837 US
Parent 12022868 Jan 2008 US
Child 13182893 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10405707 Apr 2003 US
Child 12022868 US
Parent 09886280 Jun 2001 US
Child 10405707 US