Grain-oriented electrical steel sheet and method for producing thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11603575
  • Patent Number
    11,603,575
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 19, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 14, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A grain-oriented electrical steel sheet includes: a silicon steel sheet including Si and Mn; a glass film arranged on a surface of the silicon steel sheet; and an insulation coating arranged on a surface of the glass film, wherein the glass film includes a Mn-containing oxide.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet and method for producing thereof.


Priority is claimed on Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-052898, filed on Mar. 20, 2018, and the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND ART
Background Art

A grain-oriented electrical steel sheet includes a silicon steel sheet for base sheet which is composed of grains oriented to {110}<001> (hereinafter, Goss orientation) and which includes 7 mass % or less of Si. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet has been mainly applied to iron core materials of transformer. When the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet is utilized for the iron core materials of transformer, in other words, when the steel sheets are laminated as the iron core, it is necessary to ensure interlaminar insulation (insulation between laminated steel sheets). Thus, in order to ensure the insulation for the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, it is needed to form a primary coating (glass film) and a secondary coating (insulation coating) on the surface of silicon steel sheet. In addition, the glass film and the insulation coating have effect of improving the magnetic characteristics by applying tension to the silicon steel sheet.


A method for forming the glass film and the insulation coating and a typical method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet are as follows. A silicon steel slab including 7 mass % or less of Si is hot-rolled, and is cold-rolled once or cold-rolled two times with intermediate annealing therebetween, whereby a steel sheet having a final thickness is obtained. Thereafter, an annealing in a wet hydrogen atmosphere (decarburization annealing) is conducted for decarburization and primary recrystallization. In the decarburization annealing, an oxide film (Fe2SiO4, SiO2, and the like) is formed on the surface of steel sheet. Then, an annealing separator containing MgO (magnesia) as a main component is applied to the decarburization annealed sheet. After drying the annealing separator, a final annealing is conducted. By the final annealing, secondary recrystallization occurs in the steel sheet, and the grains are aligned with {110}<001> orientation. Simultaneously, MgO in the annealing separator reacts with the oxide film of decarburization annealing, whereby the glass film (Mg2SiO4 and the like) is formed on the surface of steel sheet. Subsequently, a solution mainly containing a phosphate is applied onto the surface of final annealed sheet, namely on the surface of glass film, and then, baking is conducted, whereby the insulation coating (phosphate based coating) is formed.


The glass film is important for securing the insulation, but adhesion thereof is significantly affected by various factors. For example, when the sheet thickness of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet becomes thin, iron loss which is one of the magnetic characteristics improves, but the adhesion of glass film tends not to be secured. Thus, in regard to the glass film of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, the improvement in adhesion and the stable control have been issues. The glass film is derived from the oxide film formed by the decarburization annealing, and therefore, the glass film has been tried to be improved by controlling conditions of decarburization annealing.


Patent Document 1 discloses the technique to form the glass film excellent in adhesion by pickling the surface layer of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet which is cold-rolled to the final thickness before conducting the decarburization annealing, by removing the surface accretion and the surface layer of base steel, and by evenly proceeding the decarburization and oxide formation.


Patent Documents 2 to 4 disclose the technique to improve the coating adhesion by applying the fine roughness to the steel sheet surface during the decarburization annealing and by reaching the glass film to the deep area of steel sheet.


Patent Documents 5 to 8 disclose the technique to improve the adhesion of glass film by controlling the oxidation degree of decarburization annealing atmosphere. The technique is to accelerate the oxidation of decarburization-annealed sheet and thereby to promote the formation of glass film.


Further technical development has progressed, Patent Documents 9 to 11 disclose the technique to improve the adhesion of glass film and the magnetic characteristics by focusing the heating stage of decarburization annealing and by controlling the heating rate in addition to the atmosphere in the heating stage.


RELATED ART DOCUMENTS
Patent Documents



  • [Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S50-71526

  • [Patent Document 2] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S62-133021

  • [Patent Document 3] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S63-7333

  • [Patent Document 4] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S63-310917

  • [Patent Document 5] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H2-240216

  • [Patent Document 6] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H2-259017

  • [Patent Document 7] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H6-33142

  • [Patent Document 8] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H10-212526

  • [Patent Document 9] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H11-61356

  • [Patent Document 10] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2000-204450

  • [Patent Document 11] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2003-27194



Non-Patent Document



  • [Non-Patent Document 1] “Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Phases in Sinter Ore by Rietveld Method”, Toni Takayama et al., General incorporated association—The Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Tetsu-to-Hagane, Vol. 103 (2017) No. 6, p. 397-406, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2016-069.



SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem to be Solved

However, the techniques described in Patent Documents 1 to 4 require an additional step in the process, and thus the operation load becomes high. For that reason, the further improvement has been desired.


The techniques described in Patent Documents 5 to 8 improve the adhesion of glass film, but the secondary recrystallization may become unstable and the magnetic characteristics (magnetism) may deteriorate.


The techniques described in Patent Documents 9 to 11 improve the magnetic characteristics, but the improvement for film is still insufficient. For example, in the case of the base materials with sheet thickness of 0.23 mm or less (hereinafter, thin base sheet), the adhesion of glass film is insufficient. The adhesion of glass film becomes unstable with decrease in the sheet thickness. For that reason, the further improvement for the adhesion of glass film has been required.


The present invention has been made in consideration of the above mentioned situations. An object of the invention is to provide a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet excellent in the coating adhesion without deteriorating the magnetic characteristics, and method for producing thereof.


Solution to Problem

The present inventors have made a thorough investigation to solve the above mentioned situations. As a result, it is found that the adhesion of glass film is drastically improved when the Mn-containing oxide is included in the glass film. Moreover, the above effect obtained by the technique becomes remarkable in the thin base sheet.


In addition, the present inventors found that the Mn-containing oxide is preferably formed in the glass film by comprehensively and inseparably controlling the heating conditions and the atmosphere conditions in the decarburization annealing process and the insulation coating forming process.


An aspect of the present invention employs the following.


(1) A grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention includes:


a silicon steel sheet including, as a chemical composition, by mass %, 2.50 to 4.0% of Si, 0.010 to 0.50% of Mn, 0 to 0.20% of C, 0 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al, 0 to 0.020% of N, 0 to 0.080% of S, 0 to 0.020% of Bi, 0 to 0.50% of Sn, 0 to 0.50% of Cr, 0 to 1.0% of Cu, and a balance consisting of Fe and impurities;


a glass film arranged on a surface of the silicon steel sheet; and


an insulation coating arranged on a surface of the glass film,


wherein the glass film includes a Mn-containing oxide.


(2) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to (1), the Mn-containing oxide may include at least one selected from a group consisting of a Braunite and Mn3O4.


(3) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to (1) or (2), the Mn-containing oxide may be arranged at an interface with the silicon steel sheet in the glass film.


(4) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (3), 0.1 to 30 pieces/μm2 of the Mn-containing oxide may be arranged at the interface in the glass film.


(5) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (4),


when IFor is a diffracted intensity of a peak originated in a forsterite and ITiN is a diffracted intensity of a peak originated in a titanium nitride in a range of 41°<20<43° of an X-ray diffraction spectrum of the glass film measured by an X-ray diffraction method,


the IFor and the ITiN may satisfy ITiN<IFor.


(6) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (5), a number fraction of secondary recrystallized grains whose maximum diameter is 30 to 100 mm may be 20 to 80% as compared with entire secondary recrystallized grains in the silicon steel sheet.


(7) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (6), an average thickness of the silicon steel sheet may be 0.17 mm or more and less than 0.22 mm.


(8) In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (7), the silicon steel sheet may include, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one selected from a group consisting of 0.0001 to 0.0050% of C, 0.0001 to 0.0100% of acid-soluble Al, 0.0001 to 0.0100% of N, 0.0001 to 0.0100% of S, 0.0001 to 0.0010% of Bi, 0.005 to 0.50% of Sn, 0.01 to 0.50% of Cr, and 0.01 to 1.0% of Cu.


(9) A method for producing a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention, the method is for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (8), and the method may include:


a hot rolling process of heating a slab to a temperature range of 1200 to 1600° C. and then hot-rolling the slab to obtain a hot rolled steel sheet, the slab including, as the chemical composition, by mass %, 2.50 to 4.0% of Si, 0.010 to 0.50% of Mn, 0 to 0.20% of C, 0 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al, 0 to 0.020% of N, 0 to 0.080% of S, 0 to 0.020% of Bi, 0 to 0.50% of Sn, 0 to 0.50% of Cr, 0 to 1.0% of Cu, and a balance consisting of Fe and impurities;


a hot band annealing process of annealing the hot rolled steel sheet to obtain a hot band annealed sheet;


a cold rolling process of cold-rolling the hot band annealed sheet by cold-rolling once or by cold-rolling plural times with an intermediate annealing to obtain a cold rolled steel sheet;


a decarburization annealing process of decarburization-annealing the cold rolled steel sheet to obtain a decarburization annealed sheet;


a final annealing process of applying an annealing separator to the decarburization annealed sheet and then final-annealing the decarburization annealed sheet so as to form a glass film on a surface of the decarburization annealed sheet to obtain a final annealed sheet; and


an insulation coating forming process of applying an insulation coating forming solution to the final annealed sheet and then heat-treating the final annealed sheet so as to form an insulation coating on a surface of the final annealed sheet,


wherein, in the decarburization annealing process, when a dec-S500-600 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second and a dec-P500-600 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in a temperature range of 500 to 600° C. during raising a temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet and when a dec-S600-700 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second and a dec-P600-700 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in a temperature range of 600 to 700° C. during raising the temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet,


the dec-S500-600 may be 300 to 2000° C./second, the dec-S600-700 may be 300 to 3000° C./second, the dec-S500-600 and the dec-S600-700 may satisfy dec-S500-600<dec-S600-700, the dec-P500-600 may be 0.00010 to 0.50, and the dec-P600-700 may be 0.00001 to 0.50,


wherein, in the final annealing process, the decarburization annealed sheet after applying the annealing separator may be held in a temperature range of 1000 to 1300° C. for 10 to 60 hours, and


wherein, in the insulation coating forming process, when an ins-S600-700 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second in a temperature range of 600 to 700° C. and an ins-S700-800 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second in a temperature range of 700 to 800° C. during raising a temperature of the final annealed sheet,


the ins-S600-700 may be 10 to 200° C./second, the ins-S700-800 may be 5 to 100° C./second, and the ins-S600-700 and the ins-S700-800 may satisfy ins-S600-700>ins-S700-800.


(10) In the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to (9), in the decarburization annealing process, the dec-P500-600 and the dec-P600-700 may satisfy dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700.


(11) In the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to (9) or (10), in the decarburization annealing process,


a first annealing and a second annealing may be conducted after raising the temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet, and


when a dec-TI is a holding temperature in units of ° C., a dec-tI is a holding time in units of second, and a dec-PI is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere during the first annealing and when a dec-TII is a holding temperature in units of ° C., a dec-tII is a holding time in units of second, and a dec-PII is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere during the second annealing,


the dec-TI may be 700 to 900° C., the dec-tI may be 10 to 1000 seconds, the dec-PI may be 0.10 to 1.0, the dec-TII may be (dec-TI+50° C.) or more and 1000° C. or less, the dec-tII may be 5 to 500 seconds, the dec-PII may be 0.00001 to 0.10, and the dec-PI and the dec-PII may satisfy dec-PI>dec-PII.


(12) In the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (9) to (11), in the decarburization annealing process, the dec-P500-600, the dec-P600-700, the dec-PI, and the dec-PII may satisfy dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700<dec-PI>dec-PII.


(13) In the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (9) to (12), in the insulation coating forming process,


when an ins-P600-700 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. and an ins-P700-800 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in the temperature range of 700 to 800° C. during raising the temperature of the final annealed sheet,


the ins-P600-700 may be 1.0 or more, the ins-P700-800 may be 0.1 to 5.0, and the ins-P600-700 and the ins-P700-800 may satisfy ins-P600-700>ins-P700-800.


(14) In the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (9) to (13), in the final annealing process, the annealing separator may include a Ti-compound of 0.5 to 10 mass % in metallic Ti equivalent.


(15) In the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (9) to (14), the slab may include, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one selected from a group consisting of 0.01 to 0.20% of C, 0.01 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al, 0.0001 to 0.020% of N, 0.005 to 0.080% of S, 0.001 to 0.020% of Bi, 0.005 to 0.50% of Sn, 0.01 to 0.50% of Cr, and 0.01 to 1.0% of Cu.


Effects of Invention

According to the above aspects of the present invention, it is possible to provide the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet excellent in the coating adhesion without deteriorating the magnetic characteristics, and method for producing thereof.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional illustration of a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, a preferable embodiment of the present invention is described in detail. However, the present invention is not limited only to the configuration which is disclosed in the embodiment, and various modifications are possible without departing from the aspect of the present invention. In addition, the limitation range as described below includes a lower limit and an upper limit thereof. However, the value expressed by “more than” or “less than” does not include in the limitation range. “%” of the amount of respective elements expresses “mass %”.


The details which lead to the embodiment are described below.


1. Background Leading to this Embodiment

The present inventors investigate the morphology of glass film in order to secure the adhesion between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet (base steel sheet). To begin with, the adhesion between the glass film and the steel sheet strongly depends on the morphology of glass film. For example, in the case of the structure such that the glass film bites the silicon steel sheet (hereinafter, intruding structure), the adhesion of glass film is excellent.


However, it is not easy to secure the adhesion of glass film. In particular, when the sheet thickness becomes thin, it becomes more difficult to secure the adhesion of glass film. Although the cause is not completely clear, the present inventors assume that the formation behavior of oxide film in the decarburization annealing is peculiar to the thin base sheet.


For the above situations, the present inventors conceive the technique to secure the adhesion of glass film by forming the oxide as an anchor between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet. Moreover, in order to control the formation of anchor oxide, the present inventors focus on and investigate the annealing conditions (heat treatment conditions) in the decarburization annealing process and the insulation coating forming process. As a result, the present inventors found that the adhesion of glass film is drastically improved by comprehensively and inseparably controlling the heating conditions and the atmosphere conditions in the decarburization annealing process and the insulation coating forming process.


As a result of analyzing the material having excellent adhesion of glass film, it is confirmed that the Mn-containing oxide is included in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet. As a result of analyzing the oxide in detail by transmission electron microscope (hereinafter, TEM) and X-ray diffraction (hereinafter, XRD), it is found that the Mn-containing oxide includes preferably at least one selected from the group consisting of Braunite (Mn7SiO12) and Trimanganese tetroxide (Mn3O4) and that the Mn-containing oxide acts as the anchor oxide. Moreover, as a result of investigating the formation mechanism of Mn-containing oxide, it is found that the Mn-containing oxide is formed by the following mechanism.


First, when the heating rate and the atmosphere in the heating stage of decarburization annealing are controlled, a precursor of Mn-containing oxide (hereinafter, Mn-containing precursor) is formed near the surface of steel sheet. When the above decarburization annealed sheet is subjected to the final annealing, Mn segregates between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet (hereinafter, interfacial segregation Mn).


Secondly, when the above final annealed sheet is subjected to the insulation coating forming and when the heating rate in the heating stage of insulation coating forming is controlled, the Mn-containing oxide is formed from the Mn-containing precursor and the interfacial segregation Mn. The Mn-containing oxide (in particular, Braunite or Trimanganese tetroxide) acts as the anchor and contributes to the improvement of the adhesion of glass film.


As described above, the present inventors investigate the morphology of Mn-containing oxide in the glass film and the control technique thereof, and as a result, arrive at the embodiment.


2. Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet

The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment is described.


2-1. Main Features of Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional illustration of the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet 1 according to the embodiment includes a silicon steel sheet 11 (base steel sheet) having secondary recrystallized structure, a glass film 13 (primary coating) arranged on the surface of silicon steel sheet 11, and an insulation coating 15 (secondary coating) arranged on the surface of glass film 13. The glass film 13 includes the Mn-containing oxide 131. Although the glass film and the insulation coating may be formed on at least one surface of the silicon steel sheet, these are formed on both surfaces of the silicon steel sheet in general.


Hereinafter, the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment is explained focusing on characteristic features. The explanation of the known features and the features which can be controlled by the skilled person are omitted.


(Glass Film)


The glass film is an inorganic film which mainly includes magnesium silicate (MgSiO3, Mg2SiO4, and the like). In general, the glass film is formed during final annealing by reacting the annealing separator containing magnesia with the elements which is included in the silicon steel sheet or the oxide film such as SiO2 on the surface of silicon steel sheet. Thus, the glass film has the composition derived from the components of annealing separator and silicon steel sheet. For example, the glass film may include spinel (MgAl2O4) and the like. In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, the glass film includes the Mn-containing oxide.


As described above, in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, the Mn-containing oxide is purposely formed in the glass film, and thereby the coating adhesion is improved. Since the coating adhesion is improved in so far as the Mn-containing oxide is included in the glass film, the fraction of Mn-containing oxide in the glass film is not particularly limited. In the embodiment, the Mn-containing oxide only has to be included in the glass film.


However, in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, it is preferable that the Mn-containing oxide includes at least one selected from the group consisting of Braunite (Mn7SiO12) and Trimanganese tetroxide (Mn3O4). In other words, it is preferable that at least one selected from the group consisting of Braunite and Mn3O4 is included as the Mn-containing oxide in the glass film. When Braunite or Trimanganese tetroxide is included as the Mn-containing oxide in the glass film, it is possible to improve the coating adhesion without deteriorating the magnetic characteristics.


In addition, when the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is included in the glass film in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet, the anchor effect can be preferably obtained. Thus, it is preferable that the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is arranged at the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet in the glass film.


In addition to the fact that the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is arranged at the interface with the silicon steel sheet in the glass film, it is more preferable that 0.1 to 30 pieces/μm2 of the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) are arranged at the interface in the glass film. When the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) at the above-mentioned number density is included in the glass film in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet, it is possible to more preferably obtain the anchor effect.


In order to preferably obtain the anchor effect, the lower limit of number density of the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is preferably 0.5 pieces/μm2, more preferably 1.0 pieces/μm2, and most preferably 2.0 pieces/μm2. On the other hand, in order to avoid a decrease in magnetic characteristics caused by the unevenness of the interface, the upper limit of number density of the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is preferably 20 pieces/μm2, more preferably 15 pieces/μm2, and most preferably 10 pieces/μm2.


The method for confirming the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) in the glass film and the method for measuring the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) included at the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet in the glass film are described later in detail.


In addition, in the conventional grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, the glass film may include Ti. In the case, Ti included in the glass film reacts with N eliminated from the silicon steel sheet by purification during the final annealing to form TiN in the glass film. On the other hand, in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, even when the glass film includes Ti, almost no TiN is included in the glass film after the final annealing.


In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, N eliminated from the silicon steel sheet during the final annealing is trapped in the Mn-containing precursor or the interfacial segregation Mn in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet. Thus, even when the glass film includes Ti, N eliminated from the silicon steel plate during the final annealing tends not to react with Ti in the glass film, so that the formation of TiN is suppressed.


For example, in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, regardless of whether or not the glass film includes Ti, the forsterite (Mg2SiO4) which is the main component in the glass film and the titanium nitride (TiN) in the glass film satisfy the following conditions as final product.


When IFor is a diffracted intensity of a peak originated in the forsterite and ITiN is a diffracted intensity of a peak originated in the titanium nitride in a range of 41°<2θ<43° of an X-ray diffraction spectrum of the glass film measured by an X-ray diffraction method, IFor and ITiN satisfy ITiN<IFor. In the case where the glass film includes Ti in the conventional grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, the above-mentioned IFor and ITiN become ITiN>IFor as final product.


The method for measuring the X-ray diffraction spectrum of the glass film by the X-ray diffraction method is described later in detail.


(Secondary Recrystallized Grain Size of Silicon Steel Sheet)


In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet has the secondary recrystallized structure. For example, when the magnetic flux density B8 is 1.89 to 2.00 T, the silicon steel sheet is judged to have the secondary recrystallized structure. It is preferable that the secondary recrystallized grain size of silicon steel sheet is coarse. Thereby, it is possible to more preferably obtain the coating adhesion. Specifically, it is preferable that a number fraction of secondary recrystallized grains whose maximum diameter is 30 to 100 mm is 20% or more as compared with the entire secondary recrystallized grains in the silicon steel sheet. The number fraction is more preferably 30% or more. On the other hand, the upper limit of number fraction is not particularly limited. However, the upper limit may be 80% as the industrially controllable value.


As described above, in the embodiment, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is formed as the anchor in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet, and thereby the adhesion of glass film is improved. It is preferable that the anchor is formed not at the secondary recrystallized grain boundary but in the secondary recrystallized grain. Since the grain boundary is an aggregate of lattice defects, even when the Mn-containing oxide is formed at the grain boundary, the Mn-containing oxide tends not to be intruded into the silicon steel sheet as the anchor. In the silicon steel sheet in which coarse secondary recrystallized grains are mainly included, the possibility of forming the Mn-containing oxide inside the grain increases, and thereby the coating adhesion can be further improved.


In the embodiment, the secondary recrystallized grain and the maximum diameter of secondary recrystallized grain are defined as follows. In regard to the grain of silicon steel sheet, the maximum diameter of the grain is defined as the longest line segment in the grain among the line segments parallel to the rolling direction and parallel to the transverse direction (direction perpendicular to the rolling direction). Moreover, the grain with the maximum diameter of 15 mm or more is regarded as the secondary recrystallized grain.


The method for measuring the above-mentioned number fraction of coarse secondary recrystallized grains is described later in detail.


(Sheet Thickness of Silicon Steel Sheet)


In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, the sheet thickness of silicon steel sheet is not particularly limited. For example, the average thickness of silicon steel sheet may be 0.17 to 0.29 mm. However, in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, when the sheet thickness of silicon steel sheet is thin, the effect of improving the coating adhesion is remarkably obtained. Thus, the average thickness of silicon steel sheet is preferably 0.17 to less than 0.22 mm, and more preferably 0.17 to 0.20 mm.


The reason why the effect of improving the coating adhesion is remarkably obtained with the thin base sheet is not clear at present, but the following mechanism is considered. As described above, in the embodiment, it is necessary to form the Mn-containing oxide (particularly, Braunite or Mn3O4). The formation of Mn-containing oxide is limited by the situation where Mn in the steel diffuses to the surface of steel sheet. For example, the fraction of surface area as compared with volume with respect to the thin base sheet is larger than that with respect to thick base sheet. Thus, in the thin base sheet, the diffusion length of Mn from the inside to the surface of steel sheet is short. As a result, in the thin base sheet, Mn diffuses from the inside of steel sheet and reaches the surface of steel sheet in a substantially short time, and the Mn-containing oxide is easily formed as compared with the thick base sheet. For example, although the details are described later, in the thin base sheet, it is possible to efficiently form the Mn-containing precursor in low temperature range of 500 to 600° C. in the heating stage of decarburization annealing.


2-2. Chemical Composition


Next, the chemical composition of silicon steel sheet of the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment is explained. In the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet includes, as a chemical composition, base elements, optional elements as necessary, and a balance consisting of Fe and impurities.


In the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet includes Si and Mn as the base elements (main alloying elements).


(2.50 to 4.0% of Si)


Si (silicon) is the base element. When the Si content is less than 2.50%, the phase transformation occurs in the steel during the secondary recrystallization annealing, the secondary recrystallization does not sufficiently proceed, and the excellent magnetic flux density and iron loss are not obtained. Thus, the Si content is to 2.50% or more. The Si content is preferably 3.00% or more, and more preferably 3.20% or more. On the other hand, when the Si content is more than 4.0%, the steel sheet becomes brittle, and the possibility during the production significantly deteriorates. Thus, the Si content is to 4.0% or less. The Si content is preferably 3.80% or less, and more preferably 3.60% or less.


(0.010 to 0.50% of Mn)


Mn (manganese) is the base element. When the Mn content is less than 0.010%, it is difficult to include the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) in the glass film, even when the decarburization annealing process and the insulation coating forming process are controlled. Thus, the Mn content is set to 0.010% or more. The Mn content is preferably 0.03% or more, and more preferably 0.05% or more. On the other hand, when the Mn content is more than 0.5%, the phase transformation occurs in the steel during the secondary recrystallization annealing, the secondary recrystallization does not sufficiently proceed, and the excellent magnetic flux density and iron loss are not obtained. Thus, the Mn content is to 0.50% or less. The Mn content is preferably 0.2% or less, and more preferably 0.1% or less.


In the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet may include the impurities. The impurities correspond to elements which are contaminated during industrial production of steel from ores and scrap that are used as a raw material of steel, or from environment of a production process.


Moreover, in the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet may include the optional elements in addition to the base elements and the impurities. For example, as substitution for a part of Fe which is the balance, the silicon steel sheet may include the optional elements such as C, acid-soluble Al, N, S, Bi, Sn, Cr, and Cu. The optional elements may be included as necessary. Thus, a lower limit of the respective optional elements does not need to be limited, and the lower limit may be 0%. Moreover, even if the optional elements may be included as impurities, the above mentioned effects are not affected.


(0 to 0.20% of C)


C (carbon) is the optional element. When the C content is more than 0.20%, the phase transformation may occur in the steel during the secondary recrystallization annealing, the secondary recrystallization may not sufficiently proceed, and the excellent magnetic flux density and iron loss may be not obtained. Thus, the C content may be 0.20% or less. The C content is preferably 0.15% or less, and more preferably 0.10% or less. The lower limit of the C content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since C has the effect of improving the magnetic flux density by controlling the primary recrystallized texture, the lower limit of the C content may be 0.01%, 0.03%, or 0.06%. When C is excessively included as the impurity in the final product due to insufficient decarburization in the decarburization annealing, the magnetic characteristics may be adversely affected. Thus, the C content of silicon steel sheet is preferably 0.0050% or less. Although the C content of silicon steel sheet may be 0%, it is not industrially easy to control the C content to actually 0%, and thus the C content of silicon steel sheet may be 0.0001% or more.


(0 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al)


The acid-soluble Al (aluminum) (sol-Al) is the optional element. When the acid-soluble Al content is more than 0.070%, the steel sheet may become brittle. Thus, the acid-soluble Al content may be 0.070% or less. The acid-soluble Al content is preferably 0.05% or less, and more preferably 0.03% or less. The lower limit of the acid-soluble Al content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since the acid-soluble Al has the effect of favorably developing the secondary recrystallization, the lower limit of the acid-soluble Al content may be 0.01% or 0.02%. When Al is excessively included as the impurity in the final product due to insufficient purification during the final annealing, the magnetic characteristics may be adversely affected. Thus the acid-soluble Al content of silicon steel sheet is preferably 0.0100% or less. Although the Al content of silicon steel sheet may be 0%, it is not industrially easy to control the Al content to actually 0%, and thus the acid-soluble Al content of silicon steel sheet may be 0.0001% or more.


(0 to 0.020% of N)


N (nitrogen) is the optional element. When the N content is more than 0.020%, blisters (voids) may be formed in the steel sheet during the cold rolling, the strength of steel sheet may increase, and the possibility during the production may deteriorate. Thus, the N content may be 0.020% or less. The N content is preferably 0.015% or less, and more preferably 0.010% or less. The lower limit of the N content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since N forms AlN and has the effect as the inhibitor for secondary recrystallization, the lower limit of the N content may be 0.0001% or 0.005%. When N is excessively included as the impurity in the final product due to insufficient purification during the final annealing, the magnetic characteristics may be adversely affected. Thus the N content of silicon steel sheet is preferably 0.0100% or less. Although the N content of silicon steel sheet may be 0%, it is not industrially easy to control the N content to actually 0%, and thus the N content of silicon steel sheet may be 0.0001% or more.


(0 to 0.080% of S)


S (sulfur) is the optional element. When the S content is more than 0.080%, the steel sheet may become brittle in the higher temperature range, and it may be difficult to conduct the hot rolling. Thus, the S content may be 0.080% or less. The S content is preferably 0.04% or less, and more preferably 0.03% or less. The lower limit of the S content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since S forms MnS and has the effect as the inhibitor for secondary recrystallization, the lower limit of the S content may be 0.005% or 0.01%. When S is excessively included as the impurity in the final product due to insufficient purification during the final annealing, the magnetic characteristics may be adversely affected. Thus the S content of silicon steel sheet is preferably 0.0100% or less. Although the S content of silicon steel sheet may be 0%, it is not industrially easy to control the S content to actually 0%, and thus the S content of silicon steel sheet may be 0.0001% or more.


(0 to 0.020% of Bi)


Bi (bismuth) is the optional element. When the Bi content is more than 0.020%, the possibility during cold rolling may deteriorate. Thus, the Bi content may be 0.020% or less. The Bi content is preferably 0.0100% or less, and more preferably 0.0050% or less. The lower limit of the Bi content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since Bi has the effect of improving the magnetic characteristics, the lower limit of the Bi content may be 0.0005% or 0.0010%. When Bi is excessively included as the impurity in the final product due to insufficient purification during the final annealing, the magnetic characteristics may be adversely affected. Thus the Bi content of silicon steel sheet is preferably 0.0010% or less. Although the Bi content of silicon steel sheet may be 0%, it is not industrially easy to control the Bi content to actually 0%, and thus the Bi content of silicon steel sheet may be 0.0001% or more.


(0 to 0.50% of Sn)


Sn (tin) is the optional element. When the Sn content is more than 0.50%, the secondary recrystallization may become unstable and the magnetic characteristics may deteriorate. Thus, the Sn content may be 0.50% or less. The Sn content is preferably 0.30% or less, and more preferably 0.15% or less. The lower limit of the Sn content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since Sn has the effect of improving the coating adhesion, the lower limit of the Sn content may be 0.005% or 0.01%.


(0 to 0.50% of Cr)


Cr (chromium) is the optional element. When the Cr content is more than 0.50%, Cr may form the Cr oxide and the magnetic characteristics may deteriorate. Thus, the Cr content may be 0.50% or less. The Cr content is preferably 0.30% or less, and more preferably 0.10% or less. The lower limit of the Cr content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since Cr has the effect of improving the coating adhesion, the lower limit of the Cr content may be 0.01% or 0.03%.


(0 to 1.0% of Cu)


Cu (copper) is the optional element. When the Cu content is more than 1.0%, the steel sheet may become brittle during hot rolling. Thus, the Cu content may be 1.0% or less. The Cu content is preferably 0.50% or less, and more preferably 0.10% or less. The lower limit of the Cu content is not particularly limited, and may be 0%. However, since Cu has the effect of improving the coating adhesion, the lower limit of the Cu content may be 0.01% or 0.03%.


In the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet may include, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one selected from a group consisting of 0.0001 to 0.0050% of C, 0.0001 to 0.0100% of acid-soluble Al, 0.0001 to 0.0100% of N, 0.0001 to 0.0100% of S, 0.0001 to 0.0010% of Bi, 0.005 to 0.50% of Sn, 0.01 to 0.50% of Cr, and 0.01 to 1.0% of Cu.


In addition, in the embodiment, the silicon steel sheet may include, as the optional element, at least one selected from a group consisting of Mo, W, In, B, Sb, Au, Ag, Te, Ce, V, Co, Ni, Se, Ca, Re, Os, Nb, Zr, Hf, Ta, Y, La, Cd, Pb, and As, as substitution for a part of Fe. The silicon steel sheet may include the above optional element of 5.00% or less, preferably 3.00% or less, and more preferably 1.00% or less in total. The lower limit of the amount of the above optional element is not particularly limited, and may be 0%.


2-3. Measuring Method of Technical Features


Next, the method for measuring the above mentioned technical features of the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment is explained.


The layering structure of the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment may be observed and measured as follows.


A test piece is cut out from the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet in which the film and coating is formed, and the layering structure of the test piece is observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) or transmission electron microscope (TEM). For example, the layer whose thickness of 300 nm or more may be observed with SEM, and the layer whose thickness of less than 300 nm may be observed with TEM.


Specifically, at first, a test piece is cut out so that the cutting direction is parallel to the thickness direction (specifically, the test piece is cut out so that the in-plane direction of cross section is parallel to the thickness direction and the normal direction of cross section is perpendicular to the rolling direction), and the cross-sectional structure of this cross section is observed with SEM at a magnification at which each layer is included in the observed visual field (ex. magnification of 2000-fold). For example, in observation with a reflection electron composition image (COMP image), it can be inferred how many layers the cross-sectional structure includes. For example, in the COMP image, the silicon steel sheet can be distinguished as light color, the glass film as dark color, and the insulation coating as intermediate color.


In order to identify each layer in the cross-sectional structure, line analysis is performed along the thickness direction using SEM-EDS (energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), and quantitative analysis of the chemical composition of each layer is performed. The elements to be quantitatively analyzed are six elements Fe, P, Si, O, Mg, and Al. The analysis device is not particularly limited. In the embodiment, for example, SEM (JEOL JSM-7000F), EDS (AMETEK GENESIS 4000), and EDS analysis software (AMETEK GENESIS SPECTRUM Ver. 4.61J) may be used.


From the observation results in the COMP image and the quantitative analysis results by SEM-EDS, the silicon steel sheet is judged to be the area which is the layer located at the deepest position along the thickness direction, which has the Fe content of 80 atomic % or more and the O content of 30 atomic % or less excluding measurement noise, and which has 300 nm or more of the line segment (thickness) on the scanning line of the line analysis. Moreover, an area excluding the silicon steel sheet is judged to be the glass film and the insulation coating.


Regarding the area excluding the silicon steel sheet identified above, from the observation results in the COMP image and the quantitative analysis results by SEM-EDS, the phosphate based coating which is a kind of insulation coating is judged to be the area which has the Fe content of less than 80 atomic %, the P content of 5 atomic % or more, and the O content of 30 atomic % or more excluding the measurement noise, and which has 300 nm or more of the line segment (thickness) on the scanning line of the line analysis. Moreover, the phosphate based coating may include aluminum, magnesium, nickel, chromium, and the like derived from phosphate in addition to the above three elements which are utilized for the judgement of the phosphate based coating. Further, the phosphate based coating may include silicon derived from colloidal silica.


In order to judge the area which is the phosphate based coating, precipitates, inclusions, voids, and the like which are contained in the coating are not considered as judgment target, but the area which satisfies the quantitative analysis as the matrix is judged to be the phosphate based coating. For example, when precipitates, inclusions, voids, and the like on the scanning line of the line analysis are confirmed from the COMP image or the line analysis results, this area is not considered for the judgment, and the coating is determined by the quantitative analysis results as the matrix. The precipitates, inclusions, and voids can be distinguished from the matrix by contrast in the COMP image and can be distinguished from the matrix by the quantitative analysis results of constituent elements. When judging the phosphate based coating, it is preferable that the judgement is performed at the position which does not include precipitates, inclusions, and voids on the scanning line of the line analysis.


The glass film is judged to be the area which excludes the silicon steel sheet and the insulation coating (phosphate based coating) identified above and which has 300 nm or more of the line segment (thickness) on the scanning line of the line analysis. The glass film may satisfy, as a whole, the average Fe content of less than 80 atomic %, the average P content of less than 5 atomic %, the average Si content of 5 atomic % or more, the average O content of 30 atomic % or more, and the average Mg content of 10 atomic % or more. The quantitative analysis result of glass film is the analysis result which does not include the analysis result of precipitates, inclusions, voids, and the like included in the glass film and which is the analysis result as the matrix. When judging the glass film, it is preferable that the judgement is performed at the position which does not include precipitates, inclusions, and voids on the scanning line of the line analysis.


The identification of each layer and the measurement of the thickness by the above-mentioned COMP image observation and SEM-EDS quantitative analysis are performed on five places or more while changing the observed visual field. Regarding the thicknesses of each layer obtained from five places or more in total, an average value is calculated by excluding the maximum value and the minimum value from the values, and this average value is taken as the average thickness of each layer.


In addition, if a layer in which the line segment (thickness) on the scanning line of the line analysis is less than 300 nm is included in at least one of the observed visual fields of five places or more as described above, the layer is observed in detail by TEM, and the identification of the corresponding layer and the measurement of the thickness are performed by TEM.


A test piece including a layer to be observed in detail using TEM is cut out by focused ion beam (FIB) processing so that the cutting direction is parallel to the thickness direction (specifically, the test piece is cut out so that the in-plane direction of cross section is parallel to the thickness direction and the normal direction of cross section is perpendicular to the rolling direction), and the cross-sectional structure of this cross section is observed (bright-field image) with scanning-TEM (STEM) at a magnification at which the corresponding layer is included in the observed visual field. In the case where each layer is not included in the observed visual field, the cross-sectional structure is observed in a plurality of continuous visual fields.


In order to identify each layer in the cross-sectional structure, line analysis is performed along the thickness direction using TEM-EDS, and quantitative analysis of the chemical composition of each layer is performed. The elements to be quantitatively analyzed are six elements Fe, P, Si, O, Mg, and Al. The analysis device is not particularly limited. In the embodiment, for example, TEM (JEM-2100PLUS manufactured by JEOL Ltd.), EDS (JED-2100 manufactured by JEOL Ltd.), and EDS analysis software (Genesis Spectrum Version 4.61J) may be used.


From the observation results of the bright-field image by TEM described above and the quantitative analysis results by TEM-EDS, each layer is identified and the thickness of each layer is measured. The method for judging each layer using TEM and the method for measuring the thickness of each layer may be performed according to the method using SEM as described above.


In the method for judging each layer as described above, the silicon steel sheet is determined in the entire area at first, the insulation coating (phosphate based coating) is determined in the remaining area, and thereafter, the remaining area is determined to be the glass film. Thus, in the case of the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet satisfying the above features of the embodiment, there is no undetermined area other than the above-described layers in the entire area.


Whether or not the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is included in the glass film specified above may be confirmed by TEM.


Measurement points with equal intervals are set on a line along the thickness direction in the glass film specified by the above method, and electron beam diffraction is performed at the measurement points. When performing the electron beam diffraction, for example, the measurement points with equal intervals are set on the line along the thickness direction from the interface with the silicon steel sheet to the interface with the insulation coating, and the intervals between the measurement points with equal intervals are set to 1/10 or less of the average thickness of the glass film. Moreover, wide-area electron beam diffraction is performed under conditions such that diameter of electron beam is approximately 1/10 of the glass film.


When it is confirmed that the crystalline phase is present in the diffraction pattern obtained by the wide-area electron beam diffraction, the above crystalline phase is checked by the bright field image. For the above crystalline phase, the electron beam diffraction is performed under conditions such that the electron beam is focused so as to obtain the information of the above crystalline phase. The crystal structure, lattice spacing, and the like of the above crystalline phase are identified by the diffraction pattern obtained by the above electron beam diffraction.


The crystal data such as the crystal structure and the lattice spacing identified above are collated with PDF (Powder Diffraction File). By the collation, it is possible to confirm whether or not the Mn-containing oxide is included in the glass film. For example, Braunite (Mn7SiO12) may be identified by JCPDS No. 01-089-5662. Trimanganese tetroxide (Mn3O4) may be identified by JCPDS No. 01-075-0765. It is possible to obtain the effect of the embodiment when the Mn-containing oxide is included in the glass film.


The above-mentioned line along the thickness direction is set at equal intervals along the direction perpendicular to the thickness direction on the observation visual field, and the electron beam diffraction as described above is performed on each line. The electron beam diffraction is performed on at least 50 or more of the lines set at equal intervals along the direction perpendicular to the thickness direction and at at least 500 or more of the measurement points in total.


As a result of the identification by the above electron beam diffraction, when the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is detected on the line along the thickness direction and in the area from the interface with the silicon steel sheet to ⅕ of the thickness of glass film, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is judged to be arranged at the interface with the silicon steel sheet in the glass film.


In addition, on the basis of the identification by the above electron beam diffraction, a number of Mn-containing oxides (Braunite or Mn3O4) arranged in the area from the interface with the silicon steel sheet to ⅕ of the thickness of glass film is counted. By using the number of Mn-containing oxides and the area where the number of Mn-containing oxides is counted (area from the interface with the silicon steel sheet to ⅕ of the thickness of glass film to count the number of Mn-containing oxides), the number density of Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) arranged at the interface with the silicon steel sheet in the glass film is obtained in units of pieces/μm2. Specifically, the number density of the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) arranged at the interface in the glass film is regarded as the value obtained by dividing the number of the Mn-containing oxides (Braunite or Mn3O4) arranged in the area from the interface with the silicon steel sheet to ⅕ of the thickness of the glass film by the area of the glass film where the above number is counted.


Next, the X-ray diffraction spectrum of the above-mentioned glass film may be observed and measured as follows.


From the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, the glass film is extracted by removing the silicon steel sheet and the insulation coating. Specifically, at first, the insulating coating is removed from the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet by immersing in alkaline solution. For example, it is possible to remove the insulating coating from the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet by immersing the steel sheet in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution which includes 30 to 50 mass % of NaOH and 50 to 70 mass % of Hao at 80 to 90° C. for 5 to 10 minutes, washing it with water, and then, drying it. Moreover, the immersing time in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution may be adjusted depending on the thickness of insulating coating.


Next, a sample of 30×40 mm which is taken from the electrical steel sheet whose insulating film is removed is subjected to electrolysis treatment, the electrolysis extracted residue corresponding to the glass film is only collected, and the residue is subjected to the X-ray diffraction. For example, the electrolysis conditions may be constant current electrolysis at 500 mA, the electrolysis solution may be solution obtained by adding 1% of tetramethylammonium chloride methanol to 10% of acetylacetone, the electrolysis treatment may be conducted for 30 to 60 minutes., and the film may be collected as the electrolysis extracted residue by using sieving screen with mesh size Φ 0.2 μm.


The above electrolysis extracted residue (glass film) is subjected to the X-ray diffraction. For example, the X-ray diffraction is conducted by using CuKα-ray (Kα1) as an incident X-ray. The X-ray diffraction may be conducted by using a circular sample of Φ 26 mm and an X-ray diffractometer (RIGAKU RINT2500). Tube voltage may be 40 kV, tube current may be 200 mA, measurement angle may be 5 to 90°, stepsize may be 0.02°, scan speed may be 4°/minute, divergence and scattering slit may be ½°, length limiting slit may be 10 mm, and optical receiving slit may be 0.15 mm.


The obtained X-ray diffraction spectrum are collated with PDF (Powder Diffraction File). For example, Forsterite (Mg2SiO4) may be identified by JCPDS No. 01-084-1402, and Titanium nitride (TiN, specifically TiN0.90) may be identified by JCPDS No. 031-1403.


On the basis of the results of collation, IFor is the diffracted intensity of the peak originated in the forsterite and ITiN is the diffracted intensity of the peak originated in the titanium nitride in the range of 41°<2θ<43° of the X-ray diffraction spectrum.


The peak intensity of X-ray diffraction is defined as the area of the diffracted peak after removing the background. The removal of the background and the determination of the peak area may be performed by using typical software for XRD analysis. In determining the peak area, the spectrum after removing the background (experimental value) may be profile-fitted, and the peak area may be calculated from the fitting spectrum (calculated value) obtained above. For example, the profile fitting method of XRD spectrum (experimental value) by Rietveld analysis as described in Non-Patent Document 1 may be utilized.


Next, the maximum diameter and the number fraction of coarse secondary recrystallized grains in the silicon steel sheet may be observed and measured as follows.


From the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, the silicon steel sheet is taken by removing the glass film and the insulation coating. For example, in order to remove the insulation coating, the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet with film and coating may be immersed in hot alkaline solution as described above. Specifically, it is possible to remove the insulating coating from the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet by immersing the steel sheet in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution which includes 30 to 50 mass % of NaOH and 50 to 70 mass % of H2O at 80 to 90° C. for 5 to 10 minutes, washing it with water, and then, drying it. Moreover, the immersing time in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution may be adjusted depending on the thickness of insulating coating.


Moreover, for example, in order to remove the glass film, the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet in which the insulation coating is removed may be immersed in hot hydrochloric acid. Specifically, it is possible to remove the glass film by previously investigating the preferred concentration of hydrochloric acid for removing the glass film to be dissolved, immersing the steel sheet in the hydrochloric acid with the above concentration such as 30 to 40 mass % of HCl at 80 to 90° C. for 1 to 5 minutes, washing it with water, and then, drying it. In general, film and coating are removed by selectively using the solution, for example, the alkaline solution is used for removing the insulation coating, and the hydrochloric acid is used for removing the glass film.


By removing the insulating coating and the glass film, the metallographic structure of silicon steel sheet appears and becomes observable, and the maximum diameter of secondary recrystallized grain can be measured.


The metallographic structure of silicon steel sheet revealed above is observed. The grain with the maximum diameter of 15 mm or more is regarded as the secondary recrystallized grain, and the number fraction of coarse secondary recrystallized grains is regarded as a fraction of the grains with the maximum diameter of 30 to 100 mm in the entire secondary recrystallized grains. Specifically, the number fraction of coarse secondary recrystallized grains is regarded as the percentage of the value obtained by dividing the total number of the grains with the maximum diameter of 30 to 100 mm by the total number of the grains with the maximum diameter of 15 mm or more.


Next, the chemical composition of steel may be measured by typical analytical methods.


The steel composition of silicon steel sheet may be measured after removing the glass film and the insulation coating from the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet which the final product by the above method. Moreover, the steel composition of silicon steel slab (steel piece) may be measured by using a sample taken from molten steel before casting or a sample which is the silicon steel slab after casting but removing a surface oxide film. The steel composition may be measured by using ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer: inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy spectrometry). In addition, C and S may be measured by the infrared absorption method after combustion, N may be measured by the thermal conductometric method after fusion in a current of inert gas, and O may be measured by, for example, the non-dispersive infrared absorption method after fusion in a current of inert gas.


3. Method for Producing Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet

The method for producing grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment is described.


A typical method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet is as follows. A silicon steel slab including 7 mass % or less of Si is hot-rolled, and is hot-band-annealed. The hot band annealed sheet is pickled, and then is cold-rolled once or cold-rolled two times with intermediate annealing therebetween, whereby a steel sheet having a final thickness is obtained. Thereafter, an annealing in wet hydrogen atmosphere (decarburization annealing) is conducted for decarburization and primary recrystallization. In the decarburization annealing, an oxide film (Fe2SiO4, SiO2, and the like) is formed on the surface of steel sheet. Then, an annealing separator containing MgO (magnesia) as a main component is applied to the decarburization annealed sheet. After drying the annealing separator, a final annealing is conducted. By the final annealing, secondary recrystallization occurs in the steel sheet, and the grains are aligned with {110}<001> orientation. Simultaneously, MgO in the annealing separator reacts with the oxide film of decarburization annealing, whereby the glass film (Mg2SiO4 and the like) is formed on the surface of steel sheet. After washing with water or pickling, a solution mainly containing a phosphate is applied onto the surface of final annealed sheet, namely on the surface of glass film, and then, baking is conducted, whereby the insulation coating (phosphate based coating) is formed.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment mainly includes: a hot rolling process of hot-rolling a silicon steel slab (steel piece) including predetermined chemical composition to obtain a hot rolled steel sheet; a hot band annealing process of annealing the hot rolled steel sheet to obtain a hot band annealed sheet; a cold rolling process of cold-rolling the hot band annealed sheet by cold-rolling once or by cold-rolling plural times with an intermediate annealing to obtain a cold rolled steel sheet; a decarburization annealing process of decarburization-annealing the cold rolled steel sheet to obtain a decarburization annealed sheet; a final annealing process of applying an annealing separator to the decarburization annealed sheet and then final-annealing the decarburization annealed sheet so as to form a glass film on a surface of the decarburization annealed sheet to obtain a final annealed sheet; and an insulation coating forming process of applying an insulation coating forming solution to the final annealed sheet and then heat-treating the final annealed sheet so as to form an insulation coating on a surface of the final annealed sheet.


The above processes are respectively described in detail. In the following description, when the conditions of each process are not described, known conditions may be appropriately applied.


3-1. Hot Rolling Process


In the hot rolling process, the steel piece (ex. steel ingot such as slab) including predetermined chemical composition is hot-rolled. The chemical composition of steel piece may be the same as that of the silicon steel sheet described above.


For example, the silicon steel slab (steel piece) subjected to the hot rolling process may include, as the chemical composition, by mass %, 2.50 to 4.0% of Si, 0.010 to 0.50% of Mn, 0 to 0.20% of C, 0 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al, 0 to 0.020% of N, 0 to 0.080% of S, 0 to 0.020% of Bi, 0 to 0.50% of Sn, 0 to 0.50% of Cr, 0 to 1.0% of Cu, and a balance consisting of Fe and impurities.


In the embodiment, the silicon steel slab (steel piece) may include, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one selected from the group consisting of 0.01 to 0.20% of C, 0.01 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al, 0.0001 to 0.020% of N, 0.005 to 0.080% of S, 0.001 to 0.020% of Bi, 0.005 to 0.50% of Sn, 0.01 to 0.50% of Cr, and 0.01 to 1.0% of Cu.


In the hot rolling process, at first, the steel piece is heated. The heating temperature may be 1200 to 1600° C. The lower limit of heating temperature is preferably 1280° C. The upper limit of heating temperature is preferably 1500° C. Subsequently, the heated steel piece is hot-rolled. The thickness of hot rolled steel sheet after hot rolling is preferably within the range of 2.0 to 3.0 mm.


3-2. Hot Band Annealing Process


In the hot band annealing process, the hot rolled steel sheet after the hot rolling process is annealed. By the hot band annealing, the recrystallization occurs in the steel sheet, and finally, the excellent magnetic characteristics can be obtained. The conditions of hot band annealing are not particularly limited. For example, the hot rolled steel sheet may be subjected to the annealing in the temperature range of 900 to 1200° C. for 10 seconds to 5 minutes. Moreover, after the hot band annealing and before the cold rolling, the surface of hot band annealed sheet may be pickled.


3-3. Cold Rolling Process


In the cold rolling process, the hot band annealed sheet after the hot band annealing process is cold-rolled once or plural times with an intermediate annealing. Since the sheet shape of hot band annealed sheet is excellent due to the hot band annealing, it is possible to reduce the possibility such that the steel sheet is fractured in the first cold rolling. When the intermediate annealing is conducted at the interval of cold rolling, the heating method for intermediate annealing is not particularly limited. Although the cold rolling may be conducted three or more times with the intermediate annealing, it is preferable to conduct the cold rolling once or twice because the producing cost increases.


Final cold rolling reduction in cold rolling (cumulative cold rolling reduction without intermediate annealing or cumulative cold rolling reduction after intermediate annealing) may be within the range of 80 to 95%. By controlling the final cold rolling reduction to be within the above range, it is possible to finally increase the orientation degree of {110}<001> and to suppress the instability of secondary recrystallization. In general, the thickness of cold rolled steel sheet after cold rolling becomes the thickness (final thickness) of silicon steel sheet in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet which is finally obtained.


3-4. Decarburization Annealing Process


In the decarburization annealing process, the cold rolled steel after the cold rolling process is decarburization-annealed.


(1) Heating Conditions


In the embodiment, the heating conditions for heating the cold rolled steel sheet are controlled. Specifically, the cold rolled steel sheet is heated under the following conditions. When dec-S500-600 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second and dec-P500-600 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in a temperature range of 500 to 600° C. during raising a temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet and when dec-S600-700 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second and dec-P600-700 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in a temperature range of 600 to 700° C. during raising the temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet, the dec-S500-600 is 300 to 2000° C./second, the dec-S600-700 is 300 to 3000° C./second, the dec-S500-600 and the dec-S600-700 satisfy dec-S500-600<dec-S600-700, the dec-P500-600 is 0.00010 to 0.50, and the dec-P600-700 is 0.00001 to 0.50.


In the heating stage of decarburization annealing, SiO2 oxide film tends to be easily formed in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. It seems that the above reason is that the diffusion velocity of Si and the diffusion velocity of O in steel are balanced on the steel sheet surface in the temperature range. On the other hand, the precursor of Mn-containing oxide (Mn-containing precursor) tends to be easily formed in the temperature range of 500 to 600° C. The embodiment is directed to form the Mn-containing precursor during the decarburization annealing and thereby to improve the coating adhesion of final product. Thus, it is necessary to prolong the detention time in the range of 500 to 600° C. where the Mn-containing precursor forms, as compared with the detention time in the range of 600 to 700° C. where the SiO2 oxide film forms.


Thus, it is necessary to satisfy dec-S500-600<dec-S600-700, in addition to control the dec-S500-600 to be 300 to 2000° C./second and the dec-S600-700 to be 300 to 3000° C./second. The detention time in the range of 500 to 600° C. in the heating stage relates to the amount of formed Mn-containing precursor, and the detention time in the range of 600 to 700° C. in the heating stage relates to the amount of formed SiO2 oxide film. When the value of dec-S500-600 is more than that of dec-S600-700, the amount of formed Mn-containing precursor becomes less than that of formed SiO2 oxide film. In the case, it may be difficult to control the Mn-containing oxide in glass film of final product. The dec-S600-700 is preferably 1.2 to 5.0 times as compared with the dec-S500-600.


When the dec-S500-600 is less than 300° C./second, excellent magnetic characteristics is not obtained. The dec-S500-600 is preferably 400° C./second or more. On the other hand, when the dec-S500-600 is more than 2000° C./second, the Mn-containing precursor is not preferably formed. The dec-S500-600 is preferably 1700° C./second or less.


In addition, it is important to control the dec-S600-700. For example, when the amount of formed SiO2 oxide film is significantly insufficient, the formation of glass film may be unstable, and the defects such as holes may occur in the glass film. Thus, the dec-S600-700 is to be 300 to 3000° C./second. The dec-S600-700 is preferably 500° C./second or more. In order to suppress the overshoot, the dec-S600-700 is preferably 2500° C./second or less.


In the case where the isothermal holding is conducted at 600° C. in the heating stage of decarburization annealing, the dec-S500-600 and the dec-S600-700 may become unclear respectively. In the embodiment, in the case where the isothermal holding is conducted at 600° C. in the heating stage of decarburization annealing, the dec-S500-600 is defined as the heating rate on the basis of the point of reaching 500° C. and the point of starting the isothermal holding at 600° C. Similarly, the dec-S600-700 is defined as the heating rate on the basis of the point of finishing the isothermal holding at 600° C. and the point of reaching 700° C.


In the embodiment, in addition to the heating rate, the atmosphere is controlled in the decarburization annealing. As described above, the Mn-containing precursor tends to be easily formed in the temperature range of 500 to 600° C., and the SiO2 oxide film tends to be easily formed in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. The oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 in each of the temperature ranges affects the thermodynamic stability of formed Mn-containing precursor and formed SiO2 oxide film. Thus, in order to balance the amount of formed Mn-containing precursor and the amount of formed SiO2 oxide film, and to control the thermodynamic stability of formed Mn-containing precursor and formed SiO2 oxide film, it is necessary to control the oxidation degree in each of the temperature ranges.


Specifically, it is necessary to control the dec-P500-600 to be 0.00010 to 0.50 and the dec-P600-700 to be 0.00001 to 0.50. When the dec-P500-600 or the dec-P600-700 is out of the above range, it may be difficult to preferably control the amount and the thermodynamic stability of formed Mn-containing precursor and formed SiO2 oxide film, and to control the Mn-containing oxide in glass film of final product.


The oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 is defined as the ratio of water vapor partial pressure PH2O to hydrogen partial pressure PH2 in the atmosphere. When the dec-P500-600 is more than 0.50, the fayalite (Fe2SiO4) may be excessively formed, and thereby the formation of Mn-containing precursor may be suppressed. The upper limit of dec-P500-600 is preferably 0.3. On the other hand, the lower limit of dec-P500-600 is not particularly limited. However, the lower limit may be 0.00010. The lower limit of dec-P500-600 is preferably 0.0005.


When the dec-P600-700 is more than 0.50, Fe2SiO4 may be excessively formed, the SiO2 oxide film may tend not to be uniformly formed, and thereby the defects in the glass film may be formed. The upper limit of dec-P600-700 is preferably 0.3. On the other hand, the lower limit of dec-P600-700 is not particularly limited. However, the lower limit may be 0.00001. The lower limit of dec-P600-700 is preferably 0.00005.


In addition to control the dec-P500-600 and the dec-P600-700 to be the above ranges, it is preferable that the dec-P500-600 and the dec-P600-700 satisfy dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700. When the value of dec-P600-700 is less than that of dec-P500-600, it is possible to more preferably control the amount and the thermodynamic stability of formed Mn-containing precursor and formed SiO2 oxide film.


Although the precursor of Mn-containing oxide (Mn-containing precursor) which is formed in the decarburization annealing process of the embodiment is not clear at present, it seems that the Mn-containing precursor is composed of various manganese oxides such as MnO, Mn2O3, MnO2, MnO3, and Mn2O7, and/or various Mn—Si-based complex oxides such as tephroite (Mn2SiO4) and knebelite ((Fe, Mn)2SiO4).


In the case where the isothermal holding is conducted at 600° C. in the heating stage of decarburization annealing, the dec-P500-600 is defined as the oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 on the basis of the point of reaching 500° C. and the point of finishing the isothermal holding at 600° C. Similarly, the dec-P600-700 is defined as the oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 on the basis of the point of finishing the isothermal holding at 600° C. and the point of reaching 700° C.


(2) Holding Conditions


In the decarburization annealing process, it is important to satisfy the heating rate and the atmosphere in the above heating stage, and the holding conditions in the decarburization annealing temperature are not particularly limited. In general, in the holding stage of decarburization annealing, the holding is conducted in the temperature range of 700 to 1000° C. for 10 seconds to 10 minutes. Multi-step annealing may be conducted. In the embodiment, two-step annealing as explained below may be conducted in the holding stage of decarburization annealing.


For example, in the decarburization annealing process, the cold rolled steel sheet is held under the following conditions. The first annealing and the second annealing are conducted after raising the temperature of cold rolled steel sheet. When dec-TI is a holding temperature in units of ° C., dec-tI is a holding time in units of second, and dec-PI is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere during the first annealing and when dec-TII is a holding temperature in units of ° C., dec-tII is a holding time in units of second, and dec-PII is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere during the second annealing,


the dec-TI is 700 to 900° C.,


the dec-tI is 10 to 1000 seconds,


the dec-PI is 0.10 to 1.0,


the dec-TII is (dec-TI+50°) C. or more and 1000° C. or less,


the dec-tII is 5 to 500 seconds,


the dec-PII is 0.00001 to 0.10, and


the dec-PI and the dec-PII satisfy dec-PI>dec-PII.


In the embodiment, although it is important to control the formation of the precursor of Mn-containing oxide (Mn-containing precursor) in the heating stage of decarburization annealing, the formation of Mn-containing precursor may be preferably controlled by conducting the two-step annealing where the first annealing is conducted in lower temperature and the second annealing is conducted in higher temperature in the holding stage.


For example, in the first annealing, the dec-TI (sheet temperature) may be 700 to 900° C., and the dec-tI may be 10 seconds or more for improving the decarburization. The lower limit of dec-TI is preferably 780° C. The upper limit of dec-TI is preferably 860° C. The lower limit of dec-tI is preferably 50 seconds. The upper limit of dec-tI is not particularly limited, but may be 1000 seconds for the productivity. The upper limit of dec-tI is preferably 300 seconds.


In the first annealing, the dec-PI may be 0.10 to 1.0 for controlling the Mn-containing precursor. In addition to the above, it is preferable to control the dec-PI to be large value as compared with the dec-P500-600 and the dec-P600-700. In the first annealing, when the oxidation degree is sufficiently large, it is possible to suppress the replacement of the Mn-containing precursor with SiO2. Moreover, when the oxidation degree is sufficiently large, it is possible to sufficiently proceed the decarburization reaction. However, when the dec-PI is excessively large, the Mn-containing precursor may be replaced with the fayalite (Fe2SiO4). Fe2SiO4 deteriorates the adhesion of glass film. The lower limit of dec-PI is preferably 0.2. The upper limit of dec-PI is preferably 0.8.


Even when the first annealing is controlled, it is difficult to perfectly suppress the formation of Fe2SiO4. Thus, it is preferable to control the second-stage annealing. For example, in the second annealing, the dec-TII (sheet temperature) may be (dec-TI+50°) C. or more and 1000° C. or less, and the dec-tII may be 5 to 500 seconds. When the second annealing is conducted under the above conditions, Fe2SiO4 is reduced to the Mn-containing precursor during the second annealing, even if Fe2SiO4 is formed during the first annealing. The lower limit of dec-TII is preferably (dec-TI+100°) C. The lower limit of dec-tII is preferably 10 seconds. When the dec-tII is more than 500 seconds, the Mn-containing precursor may be reduced to SiO2. The upper limit of dec-tII is preferably 100 seconds.


In order to control the second annealing to be reducing atmosphere, it is preferable to satisfy dec-PI>dec-PII, in addition to control the dec-PII to be 0.00001 to 0.10. By conducting the second annealing under the above atmosphere conditions, it is possible to preferably obtain excellent coating adhesion as the final product.


In addition, in the embodiment, it is preferable to control the oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 through the heating stage and the holding stage of decarburization annealing. Specifically, in the decarburization annealing process, it is preferable that the dec-P500-600, the dec-P600-700, the dec-PI, and the dec-PII satisfy dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700<dec-PI>dec-PII. Namely, it is preferable that: the oxidation degree is changed to smaller value at the time of switching from the temperature range of 500 to 600° C. to the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. in the heating stage; the oxidation degree is changed to larger value at the time of switching from the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. in the heating stage to the first annealing in the holding stage; and the oxidation degree is changed to smaller value at the time of switching from the first annealing to the second annealing in the holding stage. By controlling the oxidation degree as described above, it is possible to preferably control the formation of Mn-containing precursor.


In addition, in the method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment, nitridation may be conducted after the decarburization annealing and before applying the annealing separator. In the nitridation, the steel sheet after the decarburization annealing is subjected to the nitridation, and then the nitrided steel sheet is obtained.


The nitridation may be conducted under the known conditions. For example, the preferable conditions for nitridation are as follows.


Nitridation temperature: 700 to 850° C.


Atmosphere in nitridation furnace (nitridation atmosphere): atmosphere including gas with nitriding ability such as hydrogen, nitrogen, and ammonia.


When the nitridation temperature is 700° C. or more, or when the nitridation temperature is 850° C. or less, nitrogen tends to penetrate into the steel sheet during the nitridation. When the nitridation is conducted within the temperature range, it is possible to preferably secure the amount of nitrogen in the steel sheet. Thus, the fine AlN is preferably formed in the steel sheet before the secondary recrystallization. As a result, the secondary recrystallization preferably occurs during the final annealing. The time for holding the steel sheet during the nitridation is not particularly limited, but may be 10 to 60 seconds.


3-5. Final Annealing Process


In the final annealing process, the annealing separator is applied to the decarburization annealed sheet after the decarburization annealing process, and then the final annealing is conducted. In the final annealing, the coiled steel sheet may be annealed for a long time. In order to suppress the seizure of coiled steel sheet during the final annealing, the annealing separator is applied to the decarburization annealed sheet and dried before the final annealing.


The annealing separator may include the magnesia (MgO) as main component. Moreover, the annealing separator may include the Ti-compound of 0.5 to 10 mass % in metallic Ti equivalent. During the final annealing, MgO in the annealing separator reacts with the oxide film of decarburization annealing, whereby the glass film (Mg2SiO4 and the like) is formed. In general, when the annealing separator includes Ti, TiN is formed in the glass film. On the other hand, in the embodiment, since the Mn-containing precursor and the interfacial segregation Mn are present, it is suppressed to form TiN in the glass film.


The annealing conditions of final annealing are not particularly limited, and known conditions may be appropriately applied. For example, in the final annealing, the decarburization annealed sheet after applying and drying the annealing separator may be held in the temperature range of 1000 to 1300° C. for 10 to 60 hours. By conducting the final annealing under the above conditions, the secondary recrystallization occurs, and Mn segregates between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet. As a result, it is possible to improve the coating adhesion without deteriorating the magnetic characteristics. The atmosphere during the final annealing may be nitrogen atmosphere or the mixed atmosphere of nitrogen and hydrogen. When the atmosphere during the final annealing is the mixed atmosphere of nitrogen and hydrogen, the oxidation degree may be adjusted to 0.5 or less.


By the final annealing, the secondary recrystallization occurs in the steel sheet, and the grains are aligned with {110}<001> orientation. In the secondary recrystallized structure, the easy axis of magnetization is aligned in the rolling direction, and the grains are coarse. Due to the secondary recrystallized structure, it is possible to obtain the excellent magnetic characteristics. After the final annealing and before the formation of the insulation coating, the surface of final annealed sheet may be washed with water or pickled to remove powder and the like.


In the embodiment, Mn in the steel diffuses during the final annealing, and Mn segregates in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet (interfacial segregation Mn). The reason why Mn segregates in the interface is not clear at present, it seems that the above Mn segregation is affected by the presence of the Mn-containing precursor near the surface of decarburization annealed sheet. In the case where the Mn-containing precursor does not exist near the surface of decarburization annealed sheet as the conventional technics, Mn tends not segregate in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet. Even when Mn segregates in the interface, it is difficult to obtain the interfacial segregation Mn as in the embodiment.


3-6. Insulation Coating Forming Process


In the insulation coating forming process, the insulation coating forming solution is applied to the final annealed sheet after the final annealing process, and then the heat treatment is conducted. By the heat treatment, the insulation coating is formed on the surface of the final annealed sheet. For example, the insulation coating forming solution may include colloidal silica and phosphate. The insulation coating forming solution also may include chromium.


(1) Heating Conditions


In the embodiment, the heating conditions for heating the final annealed sheet to which the insulation coating forming solution is applied are controlled. Specifically, the final annealed sheet is heated under the following conditions. When ins-S600-700 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second in a temperature range of 600 to 700° C. and ins-S700-800 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second in a temperature range of 700 to 800° C. during raising a temperature of the final annealed sheet,


the ins-S600-700 is 10 to 200° C./second,


the ins-S700-800 is 5 to 100° C./second, and


the ins-S600-700 and the ins-S700-800 satisfy ins-S600-700>ins-S700-800.


As described above, in the final annealed sheet, the Mn-containing precursor exists and Mn segregates in the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet (base steel sheet). At the time after the final annealing and before the formation of the insulation coating, Mn may exist in the interface with the Mn-containing precursor or as the interfacial segregation Mn (Mn atom alone). When the insulation coating is formed under the above heating conditions by using the above final annealed sheet, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Trimanganese tetroxide) is formed from the Mn-containing precursor and the interfacial segregation Mn.


In order to preferentially form the Mn-containing oxide, in particular Mn7SiO12 (Braunite) and Trimanganese tetroxide (Mn3O4), it is necessary to suppress the formation of SiO2 or Fe-based oxide during the heating stage for forming the insulating coating. SiO2 or Fe-based oxide has the highly symmetrical shape such as sphere or rectangle. Thus, SiO2 or Fe-based oxide does not sufficiently act as the anchor, and hard to contribute to the improvement of coating adhesion. SiO2 or Fe-based oxide preferentially forms in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. during the heating stage for forming the insulating coating. On the other hand, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) preferentially forms in the temperature range of 700 to 800° C. Thus, it is necessary to shorten the detention time in the range of 600 to 700° C. where SiO2 or Fe-based oxide forms, as compared with the detention time in the range of 700 to 800° C. where the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) forms.


Thus, it is necessary to satisfy ins-S600-700>ins-S700-800, in addition to control the ins-S600-700 to be 10 to 200° C./second and the ins-S700-800 to be 5 to 100° C./second. When the value of ins-S700-800 is more than that of ins-S600-700, the amount of formed SiO2 or Fe-based oxide becomes more than that of formed Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4). In the case, it may be difficult to improve the coating adhesion. The ins-S600-700 is preferably 1.2 to 20 times as compared with the ins-S700-800.


When the ins-S600-700 is less than 10° C./second, SiO2 or Fe-based oxide forms excessively, and then it is difficult to preferably control the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4). The ins-S600-700 is preferably 40° C./second or more. In order to suppress the overshoot, the ins-S600-700 may be 200° C./second.


In addition, it is important to control the ins-S700-800. In the temperature range, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) forms preferentially. Thus, in order to secure the detention time in the temperature range, it is necessary to decrease the value of ins-S700-800. When the ins-S700-800 is more than 100° C./second, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) does not form sufficiently. The ins-S700-800 is preferably 50° C./second or less. The lower limit of ins-S700-800 is not particularly limited, but may be 5° C./second for the productivity.


In the insulation coating forming process, it is preferable to control the oxidation degree of atmosphere in the heating stage, in addition to the above heating rate. Specifically, the final annealed sheet is preferably heated under the following conditions. When ins-P600-700 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. and ins-P700-800 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in the temperature range of 700 to 800° C. during raising the temperature of the final annealed sheet,


the ins-P600-700 is 1.0 or more,


the ins-P700-800 is 0.1 to 5.0, and


the ins-P600-700 and the ins-P700-800 satisfy ins-P600-700>ins-P700-800.


Although the insulation coating shows oxidation resistance, the structure thereof may be damaged in reducing atmosphere, and thereby it may be difficult to obtain the desired tension and coating adhesion. Thus, the oxidation degree is preferably higher value in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. where it seems that the insulation coating is started to be dried and be solidified. Specifically, the oxidation degree ins-P600-700 is preferably 1.0 or more.


On the other hand, the higher oxidation degree is unnecessary in the temperature range of 700° C. or more. Instead, when the heating is conducted in the higher oxidation degree such as 5.0 or more, it may be difficult to obtain the desired coating tension and coating adhesion. Although the detailed mechanism is not clear at present, it seems that: the crystallization of insulation coating proceeds; the grain boundaries are formed; the atmospheric gas passes through the grain boundaries; the oxidation degree increases in the glass film or the interface between the glass film and the silicon steel sheet; and the oxides harmful to the coating adhesion such as Fe-based oxide are formed. The oxidation degree in the temperature range of 700 to 800° C. is preferably smaller than that in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C.


Specifically, it is preferable to satisfy ins-P600-700>ins-P700-800, in addition to control the ins-P600-700 to be 1.0 or more and the ins-P700-800 to be 0.1 to 5.0.


In the case where the annealing is conducted in the atmosphere without hydrogen, the value of PH2O/PH2 diverges indefinitely. Thus, the upper limit of oxidation degree ins-P600-700 is not particularly limited, but may be 100.


When the ins-P700-800 is more than 5.0, SiO2 or Fe-based oxide may form excessively. Thus, the upper limit of ins-P700-800 is preferably 5.0. On the other hand, the lower limit of ins-P700-800 is not particularly limited, but may be 0. The lower limit of ins-P700-800 may be 0.1.


In the case where the holding at 700° C. or the primary cooling is conducted in the heating stage for forming the insulation coating, the ins-P600-700 is defined as the heating rate on the basis of the point of reaching 600° C. and the point of starting the holding at 700° C. or the point of starting the cooling. Similarly, the ins-P700-800 is defined as the heating rate on the basis of the point of finishing the holding at 700° C. or the point of reaching 700° C. by reheating after the cooling and the point of reaching 800° C.


(2) Holding Conditions


In the insulation coating forming process, the holding conditions in the insulation coating forming temperature are not particularly limited. In general, in the holding stage for forming the insulation coating, the holding is conducted in the temperature range of 800 to 1000° C. for 5 to 100 seconds. The holding time is preferably 50 seconds or less.


It is possible to produce the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to the embodiment by the above producing method. In the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet produced by the above producing method, the Mn-containing oxide (Braunite or Mn3O4) is included in the glass film, and thereby, the coating adhesion is preferably improved without deteriorating the magnetic characteristics.


EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the effects of an aspect of the present invention are described in detail with reference to the following examples. However, the condition in the examples is an example condition employed to confirm the operability and the effects of the present invention, so that the present invention is not limited to the example condition. The present invention can employ various types of conditions as long as the conditions do not depart from the scope of the present invention and can achieve the object of the present invention.


Example 1

A silicon steel slab (steel piece) having the composition shown in Tables 1 to 10 was heated in the range of 1280 to 1400° C. and then hot-rolled to obtain a hot rolled steel sheet having the thickness of 2.3 to 2.8 mm. The hot rolled steel sheet was annealed in the range of 900 to 1200° C., and then cold-rolled once or cold-rolled plural times with an intermediate annealing to obtain a cold rolled steel sheet having the final thickness. The cold rolled steel sheet was decarburization-annealed in wet hydrogen atmosphere. Thereafter, an annealing separator including magnesia as main component was applied, and then, a final annealing was conducted to obtain a final annealed sheet.


An insulation coating was formed by applying the insulation coating forming solution including colloidal silica and phosphate to the surface of final annealed sheet and then being baked, and thereby a grain-oriented electrical steel sheet was produced. The technical features of grain-oriented electrical steel were evaluated on the basis of the above method. Moreover, with respect to the grain-oriented electrical steel, the coating adhesion of the insulation coating and the magnetic characteristics (magnetic flux density) were evaluated.


The magnetic characteristics were evaluated on the basis of the epstein method regulated by JIS C2550: 2011. The magnetic flux density B8 was measured. B8 is the magnetic flux density along rolling direction under the magnetizing field of 800 A/m, and becomes the judgment criteria whether the secondary recrystallization occurs properly. When B8 is 1.89 T or more, the secondary recrystallization was judged to occur properly.


The coating adhesion of the insulation coating was evaluated by rolling a test piece around cylinder with 20 mm of diameter and by measuring an area fraction of remained coating after bending 180°. The area fraction of remained coating was obtained on the basis of an area of the steel sheet which contacted with the cylinder. The area of the steel sheet which contacted with the cylinder was obtained by calculation. The area of remained coating was obtained by taking a photograph of the steel sheet after the above test and by conducting image analysis on the photographic image. In regard to the area fraction of remained coating, the area fraction of 98% or more was judged to be “Excellent”, the area fraction of 95% to less than 98% was judged to be “Very Good (VG)”, the area fraction of 90% to less than 95% was judged to be “Good”, the area fraction of 85% to less than 90% was judged to be “Fair”, the area fraction of 80% to less than 85% was judged to be “Poor”, and the area fraction of less than 80% was judged to be “Bad”. When the area fraction of remained coating was 85% or more, the adhesion was judged to be acceptable.


The production conditions, production results, and evaluation results are shown in Tables 1 to 40. In the tables, “−” with respect to the chemical composition indicates that no alloying element was intentionally added or that the content was less than detection limit. In the tables, “−” other than the chemical components indicates that the test was not performed. Moreover, in the tables, the underlined value indicates out of the range of the present invention.


In the tables, “S1” indicates the dec-S500-600, “S2” indicates the dec-S600-700, “P1” indicates the dec-P500-600, “P2” indicates the dec-P600-700, “TI” indicates the dec-TI, “TII” indicates the dec-TII, “tI” indicates the dec-tI, “tII” indicates the dec-tII, “PI” indicates the dec-PI, “PII” indicates the dec-PII, “S3” indicates the ins-S600-700, “S4” indicates the ins-S700-800, “P3” indicates the ins-P600-700, and “P4” indicates the ins-P700-800. Moreover, in the tables, “OVERALL OXIDATION DEGREE CONTROL” indicates whether or not dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700<dec-PI>dec-PII is satisfied. In the tables, “NUMBER FRACTION OF COARSE SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS IN SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS” indicates the number fraction of secondary recrystallized grains with the maximum diameter of 30 to 100 mm in the entire secondary recrystallized grains. In the tables, type “B” of “Mn-CONTAINING OXIDE” indicates Braunite, type “M” of “Mn-CONTAINING OXIDE” indicates Mn3O4. Moreover, in the tables, “DIFFRACTED INTENSITY OF IFor AND ITiN BY XRD” indicates whether or not ITiN<IFor is satisfied.


In the test Nos. B4 and B48, the rupture occurred during cold rolling. In the test Nos. B11 and B51, the rupture occurred during hot rolling. In the test Nos. A131 to A133 and B43, the annealing separator included the Ti-compound of 0.5 to 10 mass % in metallic Ti equivalent. In the test No. A127, Braunite or Mn3O4 was not included as the Mn-containing oxide, and the Mn—Si-based complex oxides and the manganese oxides such as MnO were included. Moreover, the evaluation other than magnetic flux density was not performed for the steel sheet showing the magnetic flux density B8 of less than 1.89 T.


In the test Nos. A1 to A133 which are the inventive examples, the examples show excellent coating adhesion and excellent magnetic characteristics. On the other hand, in the test Nos. B1 to B53 which are the comparative examples, sufficient magnetic characteristics are not obtained, sufficient coating adhesion is not obtained, or the rupture occurred during cold rolling.











TABLE 1









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A1
2.65
0.030
0.012
0.019
0.017
0.009




800
1000
Good


A2
2.82
0.040
0.192
0.019
0.018
0.007




800
1000
Good


A3
2.65
0.040
0.035
0.018
0.018
0.008




800
1000
Good


A4
3.95
0.030
0.152
0.017
0.018
0.009




800
1000
Good


A5
2.91
0.040
0.122
0.011
0.019
0.008




800
1000
Good


A6
2.94
0.320
0.038
0.067
0.016
0.055




800
1000
Good


A7
2.90
0.450
0.187
0.061
0.018
0.045




800
1000
Good


A8
3.85
0.010
0.015
0.066
0.013
0.052




800
1000
Good


A9
3.81
0.490
0.036
0.064
0.014
0.051




800
1000
Good


A10
2.72
0.330
0.028
0.062
0.015
0.006




800
1000
Good


A11
2.95
0.170
0.121
0.014
0.011
0.078




800
1000
Good


A12
3.25
0.160
0.156
0.015
0.013
0.009

0.006


800
1000
Good


A13
3.21
0.120
0.171
0.017
0.011
0.009

0.48 


800
1000
Good


A14
3.30
0.180
0.186
0.055
0.015
0.041


0.01

800
1000
Good


A15
3.28
0.140
0.152
0.054
0.015
0.043


0.48

800
1000
Good


A16
3.25
0.160
0.122
0.062
0.014
0.008



0.01
800
1000
Good


A17
3.21
0.150
0.112
0.051
0.015
0.009



0.95
800
1000
Good


A18
3.25
0.180
0.116
0.055
0.012
0.008
0.018



800
1000
Good


A19
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




800
1000
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A1
0.1
0.1




A2
0.1
0.1




A3
0.1
0.1




A4
0.1
0.1




A5
0.1
0.1




A6
0.1
0.1




A7
0.1
0.1




A8
0.1
0.1




A9
0.1
0.1




A10
0.1
0.1




A11
0.1
0.1




A12
0.1
0.05
Good



A13
0.1
0.05
Good



A14
0.1
0.05
Good



A15
0.1
0.05
Good



A16
0.1
0.05
Good



A17
0.1
0.05
Good



A18
0.1
0.05
Good



A19
0.1
0.05
Good



















TABLE 2









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A20
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




800
1000
Good


A21
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




800
1000
Good


A22
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




800
1000
Good


A23
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


800
1000
Good


A24
3.27
0.075
0.051
0.047
0.005
0.022


0.06
0.15
800
1000
Good


A25
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
800
1000
Good


A26
3.25
0.091
0.052
0.022
0.005
0.038

0.14
0.02

800
1000
Good


A27
3.25
0.092
0.052
0.031
0.009
0.039

0.02
0.12
0.03
800
1000
Good


A28
3.35
0.078
0.056
0.046
0.006
0.032

0.33

0.11
800
1000
Good


A29
3.36
0.065
0.042
0.042
0.009
0.011
0.001

0.37

800
1000
Good


A30
3.39
0.092
0.041
0.048
0.005
0.017
0.007
0.28
 0.035

800
1000
Good


B1
3.23
0.060
0.007
0.023
0.008
0.013




800
1000
Good


B2
3.25
0.040

0.215

0.031
0.007
0.017




800
1000
Good


B3

2.45

0.060
0.042
0.045
0.007
0.015




800
1000
Good


B4

4.10

0.070
0.048
0.026
0.007
0.008









B5
3.20
0.080
0.056
0.008
0.006
0.008




800
1000
Good


B6
3.12
0.050
0.062

0.077

0.008
0.052




800
1000
Good


B7
3.20
0.480
0.055
0.022

0.025

0.045




800
1000
Good


B8
3.31

0.009

0.031
0.045
0.008
0.066




800
1000
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A20
0.1
0.05
Good



A21
0.1
0.05
Good



A22
0.1
0.05
Good



A23
0.1
0.05
Good



A24
0.1
0.05
Good



A25
0.1
0.05
Good



A26
0.1
0.05
Good



A27
0.1
0.05
Good



A28
0.1
0.05
Good



A29
0.1
0.05
Good



A30
0.1
0.05
Good



B1
0.1
0.05
Good



B2
0.1
0.05
Good



B3
0.1
0.05
Good



B4






B5
0.1
0.05
Good



B6
0.1
0.05
Good



B7
0.1
0.05
Good



B8
0.1
0.05
Good



















TABLE 3









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






B9
3.36

0.520

0.078
0.032
0.007
0.024




800
1000
Good


B10
3.34
0.440
0.062
0.020
0.008
0.004




800
1000
Good


B11
3.35
0.210
0.062
0.022
0.007

0.082










B12
2.65
0.030
0.012
0.019
0.017
0.009




620

3700

Good


B13
2.51
0.040
0.035
0.018
0.018
0.008




360

3500

Good


B14
2.91
0.040
0.122
0.011
0.019
0.008




1850

3150

Good


B15
2.90
0.450
0.187
0.061
0.018
0.045




310
310

Bad



B16
3.81
0.490
0.036
0.064
0.014
0.051




1880

3890

Good


B17
2.72
0.330
0.028
0.062
0.015
0.006




420
450
Good


A31
2.95
0.170
0.121
0.014
0.011
0.078




360
420
Good


B18
3.25
0.160
0.156
0.015
0.013
0.009

0.006


380
470
Good


B19
3.21
0.120
0.171
0.017
0.011
0.009

0.48 


390
480
Good


B20
3.30
0.180
0.186
0.055
0.015
0.041


0.01

400
490
Good


B21
3.21
0.150
0.112
0.051
0.015
0.009



0.95
1550

3900

Good


B22
3.25
0.180
0.116
0.055
0.012
0.008
0.018



410
1400
Good


A32
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




860
2700
Good


A33
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




410
700
Good


B23
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




490
980
Good


B24
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




770
1100
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










B9
0.1
0.05
Good



B10
0.1
0.05
Good



B11






B12

0.00007

0.00005
Good



B13

0.00009

0.00005
Good



B14
0.14
0.1
Good



B15
0.13
0.1
Good



B16

0.00009

0.00005
Good



B17

0.00001

0.00001




A31
0.49
0.49




B18

0.00007

0.00005
Good



B19

0.00009

0.00005
Good



B20

0.00007

0.00005
Good



B21
0.16
0.1
Good



B22

0.00007

0.00005
Good



A32
0.19
0.1
Good



A33
0.13
0.1
Good



B23

0.00008

0.00005
Good



B24

0.00006

0.00005
Good



















TABLE 4









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






B25
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




900
1450
Good


A34
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




550
2550
Good


A35
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




780
2600
Good


A36
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




720
1200
Good


A37
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




810
1180
Good


A38
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




1100
1590
Good


A39
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




1500
2100
Good


A40
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




820
990
Good


A41
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




520
1550
Good


A42
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




1700
2400
Good


A43
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


780
950
Good


A44
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


500
1600
Good


A45
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


1600
2500
Good


A46
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
810
1000
Good


A47
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
550
1600
Good


A48
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
1500
2200
Good


A49
3.25
0.091
0.052
0.022
0.005
0.038

0.14
0.02

1200
2550
Good


A50
3.25
0.091
0.052
0.022
0.005
0.038

0.14
0.02

780
2600
Good


A51
3.25
0.092
0.052
0.031
0.009
0.039

0.02
0.12
0.03
1550
1900
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










B25

0.00009

0.00005
Good



A34
0.0002
0.0001
Good



A35
0.085
0.05
Good



A36
0.0005
0.0001
Good



A37
0.0012
0.0005
Good



A38
0.0031
0.001
Good



A39
0.0012
0.0005
Good



A40
0.15
0.1
Good



A41
0.08
0.05
Good



A42
0.12
0.05
Good



A43
0.15
0.1
Good



A44
0.08
0.01
Good



A45
0.12
0.05
Good



A46
0.15
0.1
Good



A47
0.09
0.05
Good



A48
0.12
0.05
Good



A49
0.15
0.1
Good



A50
0.005
0.001
Good



A51
0.003
0.001
Good



















TABLE 5









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A52
3.25
0.092
0.052
0.031
0.009
0.039

0.02
0.12
0.03
410
1400
Good


A53
3.35
0.078
0.056
0.046
0.006
0.032

0.33

0.11
900
2700
Good


A54
3.36
0.065
0.042
0.042
0.009
0.011
0.001

0.37

410
800
Good


A55
3.36
0.065
0.042
0.042
0.009
0.011
0.001

0.37

800
2400
Good


A56
3.39
0.092
0.041
0.048
0.005
0.017
0.007
0.28
0.035

790
2500
Good


B26
3.28
0.140
0.152
0.054
0.015
0.043


0.48

590
450

Bad



B27
3.25
0.160
0.122
0.062
0.014
0.008



0.01

270

480
Good


B28
3.21
0.150
0.112
0.051
0.015
0.009



0.95

2200

2700
Good


B29
3.25
0.180
0.116
0.055
0.012
0.008
0.018



310

280


Bad



B30
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




460
880
Good


B31
3.28
0.140
0.152
0.054
0.015
0.043


0.48

620
1700
Good


B32
3.25
0.160
0.122
0.062
0.014
0.008



0.01
350
1500
Good


B33
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




550
2500
Good


A57
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




600
1300
Good


A58
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




600
1300
Good


A59
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




600
1300
Good


A60
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




600
1300
Good


A61
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




600
1300
Good


A62
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




600
1300
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A52
0.25
0.15
Good



A53
0.27
0.2
Good



A54
0.25
0.2
Good



A55
0.29
0.25
Good



A56
0.28
0.2
Good



B26
0.005
0.001
Good



B27
0.004
0.001
Good



B28
0.006
0.001
Good



B29
0.007
0.001
Good



B30

0.51

0.45
Good



B31
0.0009
0.0001
Good



B32
0.0008
0.0001
Good



B33
0.08
0.05
Good



A57
0.1
0.05
Good



A58
0.1
0.05
Good



A59
0.1
0.05
Good



A60
0.1
0.05
Good



A61
0.1
0.05
Good



A62
0.1
0.05
Good



















TABLE 6









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Or
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A63
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1300
Good


A64
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1300
Good


A65
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1300
Good


A66
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1300
Good


A67
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




600
1300
Good


A68
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




600
1300
Good


A69
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




600
1300
Good


A70
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




600
1300
Good


A71
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




600
1300
Good


A72
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




600
1300
Good


A73
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1300
Good


A74
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1300
Good


A75
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1300
Good


A76
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1300
Good


A77
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




600
1300
Good


A78
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1300
Good


A79
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1500
Good


A80
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1500
Good


A81
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




600
1500
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A63
0.1
0.05
Good



A64
0.1
0.05
Good



A65
0.1
0.05
Good



A66
0.1
0.05
Good



A67
0.1
0.05
Good



A68
0.1
0.05
Good



A69
0.1
0.05
Good



A70
0.1
0.05
Good



A71
0.1
0.05
Good



A72
0.1
0.05
Good



A73
0.1
0.05
Good



A74
0.1
0.05
Good



A75
0.1
0.05
Good



A76
0.1
0.05
Good



A77
0.1
0.05
Good



A78
0.1
0.05
Good



A79
0.1
0.05
Good



A80
0.1
0.05
Good



A81
0.1
0.05
Good



















TABLE 7









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A82
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1500
Good


A83
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1500
Good


A84
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


600
1500
Good


A85
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
600
1500
Good


A86
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
600
1500
Good


A87
3.25
0.091
0.052
0.022
0.005
0.038

0.14
0.02

600
1500
Good


A88
3.25
0.091
0.052
0.022
0.005
0.038

0.14
0.02

600
1500
Good


A89
3.25
0.092
0.052
0.031
0.009
0.039

0.02
0.12
0.03
600
1500
Good


A90
3.25
0.092
0.052
0.031
0.009
0.039

0.02
0.12
0.03
600
1500
Good


A91
3.35
0.078
0.056
0.046
0.006
0.032

0.33

0.11
600
1500
Good


A92
3.35
0.078
0.056
0.046
0.006
0.032

0.33

0.11
600
1500
Good


A93
3.36
0.065
0.042
0.042
0.009
0.011
0.001

0.37

600
1500
Good


A94
3.39
0.092
0.041
0.048
0.005
0.017
0.007
0.28
 0.035

600
1500
Good


A95
3.39
0.092
0.041
0.048
0.005
0.017
0.007
0.28
 0.035

600
1500
Good


A96
2.65
0.030
0.012
0.019
0.017
0.009




700
1100
Good


A97
2.82
0.040
0.192
0.019
0.018
0.007




700
1100
Good


A98
2.51
0.040
0.035
0.018
0.018
0.008




700
1100
Good


A99
3.95
0.030
0.152
0.017
0.018
0.009




700
1100
Good


A100
2.91
0.040
0.122
0.011
0.019
0.008




700
1100
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A82
0.1
0.05
Good



A83
0.1
0.05
Good



A84
0.1
0.05
Good



A85
0.1
0.05
Good



A86
0.1
0.05
Good



A87
0.1
0.05
Good



A88
0.1
0.05
Good



A89
0.1
0.05
Good



A90
0.1
0.05
Good



A91
0.1
0.05
Good



A92
0.1
0.05
Good



A93
0.1
0.05
Good



A94
0.1
0.05
Good



A95
0.1
0.05
Good



A96
0.05
0.01
Good



A97
0.05
0.01
Good



A98
0.05
0.01
Good



A99
0.05
0.01
Good



A100
0.05
0.01
Good



















TABLE 8









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 > S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A101
2.94
0.320
0.038
0.067
0.016
0.055




700
1100
Good


A102
2.90
0.450
0.187
0.061
0.018
0.045




700
1100
Good


A103
3.85
0.010
0.015
0.066
0.013
0.052




700
1100
Good


A104
3.81
0.490
0.036
0.064
0.014
0.051




700
1100
Good


A105
2.72
0.330
0.028
0.062
0.015
0.006




700
1100
Good


A106
2.95
0.170
0.121
0.014
0.011
0.078




700
1100
Good


A107
3.25
0.160
0.156
0.015
0.013
0.009

 0.006


700
1100
Good


A108
3.21
0.120
0.171
0.017
0.011
0.009

0.48


700
1100
Good


A109
3.30
0.180
0.186
0.055
0.015
0.041


0.01

700
1100
Good


A110
3.28
0.140
0.152
0.054
0.015
0.043


0.48

700
1100
Good


A111
3.25
0.160
0.122
0.062
0.014
0.008



0.01
700
1100
Good


A112
3.21
0.150
0.112
0.051
0.015
0.009



0.95
700
1100
Good


A113
3.25
0.180
0.116
0.055
0.012
0.008
0.018



700
1100
Good


A114
3.22
0.051
0.042
0.045
0.006
0.038




700
1100
Good


A115
3.26
0.052
0.091
0.042
0.006
0.017




700
1100
Good


A116
3.26
0.095
0.071
0.032
0.006
0.033




700
1100
Good


A117
3.28
0.081
0.081
0.022
0.007
0.023




700
1100
Good


A118
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


700
1100
Good


A119
3.27
0.075
0.051
0.047
0.005
0.022


0.06
0.15
700
1100
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A101
0.05
0.01
Good



A102
0.05
0.01
Good



A103
0.05
0.01
Good



A104
0.05
0.01
Good



A105
0.05
0.01
Good



A106
0.05
0.01
Good



A107
0.05
0.01
Good



A108
0.05
0.01
Good



A109
0.05
0.01
Good



A110
0.05
0.01
Good



A111
0.05
0.01
Good



A112
0.05
0.01
Good



A113
0.05
0.01
Good



A114
0.05
0.01
Good



A115
0.05
0.01
Good



A116
0.05
0.01
Good



A117
0.05
0.01
Good



A118
0.05
0.01
Good



A119
0.05
0.01
Good



















TABLE 9









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A120
3.25
0.085
0.060
0.025
0.008
0.028
0.002


0.08
700
1100
Good


A121
3.25
0.091
0.052
0.022
0.005
0.038

0.14
0.02

700
1100
Good


A122
3.25
0.092
0.052
0.031
0.009
0.039

0.02
0.12
0.03
700
1100
Good


A123
3.35
0.078
0.056
0.046
0.006
0.032

0.33

0.11
700
1100
Good


A124
3.36
0.065
0.042
0.042
0.009
0.011
0.001

0.37

700
1100
Good


A125
3.39
0.092
0.041
0.048
0.005
0.017
0.007
0.28
 0.035

700
1100
Good


B34
3.23
0.060
0.007
0.023
0.008
0.013




700
1100
Good


B35
3.25
0.040

0.215

0.031
0.007
0.017




700
1100
Good


B36

2.45

0.060
0.042
0.045
0.007
0.015




700
1100
Good


B37
3.20
0.080
0.056
0.008
0.006
0.008




700
1100
Good


B38
3.12
0.050
0.062

0.077

0.008
0.052




700
1100
Good


B39
3.20
0.480
0.055
0.022

0.025

0.045




700
1100
Good


B40
3.31

0.009

0.031
0.045
0.008
0.066




700
1100
Good


B41
3.36

0.520

0.078
0.032
0.007
0.024




700
1100
Good


B42
3.34
0.440
0.062
0.020
0.008
0.004




700
1100
Good


A126
2.73
0.010
0.015
0.019
0.019
0.009




900
1000
Good


A127
2.95
0.310
0.045
0.025
0.007
0.023




310
2500
Good


A128
3.90
0.490
0.039
0.047
0.009
0.039




310
350
Good


A129
2.51
0.495
0.041
0.044
0.011
0.040




310
2500
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A120
0.05
0.01
Good



A121
0.05
0.01
Good



A122
0.05
0.01
Good



A123
0.05
0.01
Good



A124
0.05
0.01
Good



A125
0.05
0.01
Good



B34
0.05
0.01
Good



B35
0.05
0.01
Good



B36
0.05
0.01
Good



B37
0.05
0.01
Good



B38
0.05
0.01
Good



B39
0.05
0.01
Good



B40
0.05
0.01
Good



B41
0.05
0.01
Good



B42
0.05
0.01
Good



A126
0.3
0.3




A127
0.0001
0.0001




A128
0.4
0.4




A129
0.0001
0.0001




















TABLE 10









PRODUCTION CONDITIONS





























DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS













HEATING STAGE













AVERAGE HEATING RATE












HOT ROLLING PROCESS
TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SLAB (STEEL PIECE)
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
500 TO
600 TO
RATE
























ACID-






600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL


TEST



SOLUBLE






S1
S2
S1 < S2


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
° C./sec
° C./sec






A130
2.78
0.080
0.051
0.031
0.005
0.010




1800 
2700
Good


A131
2.90
0.450
0.187
0.061
0.018
0.045




800
1000
Good


A132
2.90
0.450
0.187
0.061
0.018
0.045




800
1000
Good


A133
3.25
0.051
0.072
0.025
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.11


500
1500
Good


B43
2.90
0.450
0.187
0.061
0.018
0.045




800
 800

Bad



B44
2.68

0.001

0.013
0.021
0.017
0.010




900
1000
Good


B45
3.10
0.050

0.220

0.029
0.011
0.022




800
1000
Good


B46
3.07
0.045
0.055

0.081

0.012
0.045




800
1000
Good


B47
3.15
0.055
0.048
0.018

0.031

0.045




800
1000
Good


B48
2.95
0.065
0.050
0.018
0.009
0.018

0.021









B49
3.10
0.053
0.049
0.022
0.015
0.040


0.53



800
1000
Good


B50
3.02
0.045
0.045
0.020
0.012
0.035



0.51


800
1000
Good


B51
3.07
0.043
0.039
0.017
0.017
0.040




1.05






B52
3.08
0.038
0.046
0.026
0.010
0.035




800
1000
Good


B53
3.10
0.045
0.030
0.038
0.011
0.044




800
1000
Good














PRODUCTION CONDITIONS




DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS




HEATING STAGE




OXIDATION DEGREE













TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE





RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION




500 TO
600 TO
DEGREE




600° C.
700° C.
CONTROL



TEST
P1
P2
P1 > P2



No.










A130
0.0001
0.0001




A131
0.1
0.1




A132
0.1
0.05
Good



A133
0.1
0.05
Good



B43
0.1
0.05
Good



B44
0.3
0.2
Good



B45
0.1
0.05
Good



B46
0.1
0.05
Good



B47
0.1
0.05
Good



B48






B49
0.1
0.05
Good



B50
0.1
0.05
Good



B51






B52
0.0005

0.000003

Good



B53
0.48

0.51




















TABLE 11








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION

















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OVERALL



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
OXIDATION


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
DEGREE


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec



CONTROL





A1
820

160

0.5





A2
820

160

0.5





A3
820

160

0.5





A4
820

160

0.5





A5
820

160

0.5





A6
820

160

0.5





A7
820

160

0.5





A8
820

160

0.5





A9
820

160

0.5





A10
820

160

0.5





A11
820

160

0.5





A12
820

160

0.5





A13
820

160

0.5





A14
820

160

0.5





A15
820

160

0.5





A16
820

160

0.5





A17
820

160

0.5





A18
820

160

0.5





A19
820

160

0.5















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A1
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A2
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A3
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A4
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A5
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A6
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A7
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A8
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A9
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A10
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A11
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A12
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A13
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A14
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A15
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A16
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A17
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A18
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A19
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2


















TABLE 12








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION

















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OVERALL



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
OXIDATION


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
DEGREE


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec



CONTROL





A20
820

160

0.5





A21
820

160

0.5





A22
820

160

0.5





A23
820

160

0.5





A24
820

160

0.5





A25
820

160

0.5





A26
820

160

0.5





A27
820

160

0.5





A28
820

160

0.5





A29
820

160

0.5





A30
820

160

0.5





B1
820

160

0.5





B2
820

160

0.5





B3
820

160

0.5





B4










B5
820

160

0.5





B6
820

160

0.5





B7
820

160

0.5





B8
820

160

0.5















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A20
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A21
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A22
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A23
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A24
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A25
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A26
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A27
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A28
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A29
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A30
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


B1
1200

2

60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B2
1200

2

60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B3
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B4










B5
1200

2

60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B6
1200

2

60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B7
1200

2

60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B8
1200

2

60
10
Good
1.2
1.2


















TABLE 13








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION

















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OVERALL



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
OXIDATION


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
DEGREE


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec



CONTROL





B9
820

160

0.5





B10
820

160

0.5





B11










B12
830

150

0.4





B13
830

150

0.4





B14
830

150

0.4





B15
830

150

0.4





B16
830

150

0.4





B17
830

150

0.4





A31
830

150

0.4





B18
830

150

0.4





B19
830

150

0.4





B20
830

150

0.4





B21
830

150

0.4





B22
830

150

0.4





A32
830

150

0.4





A33
830

150

0.4





B23
830

150

0.4





B24
830

150

0.4















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









B9
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B10
1200
2
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B11










B12
1200
20
17
15
Good
1.2
1.2



B13
1200
20
17
15
Good
1.2
1.2



B14
1200
20
190
20
Good
1.2
1.2



B15
1200
20
200
15
Good
1.2
1.2



B16
1200
20
160
45
Good
1.2
1.2



B17
1200
20
110
48
Good
1.2
1.2



A31
1200
20
130
42
Good
1.2
1.2



B18
1200
20
50
50

Bad

1.2
1.2



B19
1200
20
200
5
Good
1.2
1.2



B20
1200
20
11
7
Good
1.2
1.2



B21
1200
20
180
95
Good
1.2
1.2



B22
1200
20
32
17
Good
1.2
1.2



A32
1200
20
24
14
Good
1.2
1.2



A33
1200
20
29
19
Good
1.2
1.2



B23
1200
20
29
15
Good
1.2
1.2



B24
1200
20
31
22
Good
1.2
1.2


















TABLE 14








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION

















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OVERALL



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
OXIDATION


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
DEGREE


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec



CONTROL





B25
830

150

0.4





A34
830

150

0.4





A35
830

150

0.4





A36
830

150

0.4





A37
830

150

0.4





A38
830

150

0.4





A39
830

150

0.4





A40
830

150

0.4





A41
830

150

0.4





A42
830

150

0.4





A43
830

150

0.4





A44
830

150

0.4





A45
830

150

0.4





A46
830

150

0.4





A47
830

150

0.4





A48
830

150

0.4





A49
830

150

0.4





A50
830

150

0.4





A51
830

150

0.4















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDAT ON DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









B25
1200
20
180
78
Good
1.2
1.2



A34
1200
20
160
92
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A35
1200
20
120
56
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A36
1200
20
189
72
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A37
1200
20
150
78
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A38
1200
20
180
65
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A39
1200
20
190
90
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A40
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A41
1200
20
55
15
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A42
1200
20
68
29
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A43
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A44
1200
20
62
13
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A45
1200
20
58
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A46
1200
20
60
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A47
1200
20
70
14
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A48
1200
20
55
28
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A49
1200
20
180
40
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A50
1200
20
175
40
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A51
1200
20
192
11
Good
2.0
1.5
Good

















TABLE 15








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION
OVERALL
















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OXIDATION



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
DEGREE


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
CONTROL


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec









A52
830

150

0.4





A53
830

150

0.4





A54
830

150

0.4





A55
830

150

0.4





A56
830

150

0.4





B26
830

150

0.4





B27
830

150

0.4





B28
830

150

0.4





B29
830

150

0.4





B30
830

150

0.4





B31
830

150

0.4





B32
830

150

0.4





B33
830

150

0.4





A57
715
800
38
7
0.86
0.73
Good
Good


A58
895
965
36
8
0.93
0.68
Good
Good


A59
772
857
12
8
0.86
0.61
Good
Good


A60
883
958
995
7
0.89
0.52
Good
Good


A61
872
952
324
7
0.12
0.11
Good
Good


A62
771
854
318
8
0.96
0.51
Good
Good












PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A52
1200
20
185 
15
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A53
1200
20
190 
15
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A54
1200
20
195 
14
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A55
1200
20
188 
15
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A56
1200
20
190 
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


B26
1200
20
180 
71
Good
1.2
1.2



B27
1200
20
190 
65
Good
1.2
1.2



B28
1200
20
45
15
Good
1.2
1.2



B29
1200
20
56
18
Good
1.2
1.2



B30
1200
20
28
19
Good
1.2
1.2



B31
1200
20
80
85

Bad

1.2
1.2



B32
1200
20
9
 6
Good
1.2
1.2



B33
1200
20
150 

102

Good
1.2
1.2



A57
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A58
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A59
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A60
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A61
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A62
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2


















TABLE 16








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION
OVERALL
















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OXIDATION



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
DEGREE


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
CONTROL


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec









A63
772
824
335
140
0.81
0.55
Good
Good


A64
773
843
342
5
0.16
0.13
Good
Good


A65
879
950
338
490
0.18
0.15
Good
Good


A66
864
947
336
120
0.15
0.14
Good
Good


A67
785
860
37
7
0.17
0.11
Good
Good


A68
843
913
347
140
0.84
0.53
Good
Good


A69
767
850
52
230
0.91
0.55
Good
Good


A70
864
932
293
7
0.82
0.65
Good
Good


A71
744
823
32
8
0.20
0.16
Good
Good


A72
869
939
310
180
0.79
0.30
Good
Good


A73
862
967
37
7
0.17
0.15
Good
Good


A74
871
993
353
165
0.87
0.55
Good
Good


A75
864
948
44
12
0.18
0.11
Good
Good


A76
883
955
345
98
0.89
0.12
Good
Good


A77
872
938
42
7
0.15
0.00003
Good
Good


A78
762
845
315
240
0.09
0.08
Good
Good


A79
820
925
180
25
0.59
0.006
Good
Good


A80
820
920
150
30
0.22
0.005
Good
Good


A81
840
940
120
25
0.75
0.003
Good
Good












PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A63
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A64
1200
20
22
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A65
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A66
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A67
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A68
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A69
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A70
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A71
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A72
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A73
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A74
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A75
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A76
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A77
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A78
1200
20
22
20
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A79
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A80
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A81
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good

















TABLE 17








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION
OVERALL
















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OXIDATION



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
DEGREE


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
CONTROL


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec









A82
830
930
140
40
0.78
0.008
Good
Good


A83
835
935
160
20
0.43
0.002
Good
Good


A84
840
940
150
30
0.55
0.004
Good
Good


A85
830
940
120
15
0.67
0.008
Good
Good


A86
825
975
140
20
0.71
0.006
Good
Good


A87
800
920
65
13
0.24
0.05
Good
Good


A88
810
930
275
25
0.59
0.02
Good
Good


A89
820
940
72
50
0.45
0.05
Good
Good


A90
843
950
288
75
0.33
0.03
Good
Good


A91
849
950
292
90
0.78
0.05
Good
Good


A92
851
960
65
72
0.49
0.15
Good
Good


A93
845
950
150
83
0.51
0.23
Good
Good


A94
800
920
172
33
0.63
0.24
Good
Good


A95
823
980
180
20
0.65
0.35
Good
Good


A96
820

130

0.5





A97
820

130

0.5





A98
820

130

0.5





A99
820

130

0.5





A100
820

130

0.5















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A82
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A83
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A84
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A85
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A86
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A87
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A88
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A89
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A90
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A91
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A92
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A93
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A94
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A95
1200
20
70
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A96
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A97
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A98
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A99
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A100
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2


















TABLE 18








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION
OVERALL
















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OXIDATION



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
DEGREE


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
CONTROL


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec









A101
820

130

0.5





A102
820

130

0.5





A103
820

130

0.5





A104
820

130

0.5





A105
820

130

0.5





A106
820

130

0.5





A107
820

130

0.5





A108
820

130

0.5





A109
820

130

0.5





A110
820

130

0.5





A111
820

130

0.5





A112
820

130

0.5





A113
820

130

0.5





A114
820

130

0.5





A115
820

130

0.5





A116
820

130

0.5





A117
820

130

0.5





A118
820

130

0.5





A119
820

130

0.5















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700°
800°
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A101
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A102
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A103
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A104
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A105
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A106
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A107
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A108
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A109
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A110
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A111
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A112
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A113
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A114
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A115
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A116
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A117
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A118
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A119
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good

















TABLE 19








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION
OVERALL
















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OXIDATION



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
DEGREE


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
CONTROL


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec









A120
820

130

0.5





A121
820

130

0.5





A122
820

130

0.5





A123
820

130

0.5





A124
820

130

0.5





A125
820

130

0.5





B34
820

130

0.5





B35
820

130

0.5





B36
820

130

0.5





B37
820

130

0.5





B38
820

130

0.5





B39
820

130

0.5





B40
820

130

0.5





B41
820

130

0.5





B42
820

130

0.5





A126
820

160

0.5





A127
720
780
15
8
0.1
0.00005
Good



A128
880
990
800
450
0.9
0.1
Good



A129
720
780
15
8
0.1
0.00005
Good













PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A120
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A121
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A122
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A123
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A124
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


A125
1200
20
65
30
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


B34
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B35
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B36
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B37
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B38
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B39
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B40
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B41
1200
20
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



B42
1200
2
65
30
Good
1.2
1.2



A126
1200
20
100
20
Good
1.2
1.2



A127
1200
20
190
100
Good
0.2
0.2



A128
1070
10
20
10
Good
4.5
4.5



A129
1220
50
180
10
Good
1.0
1.0


















TABLE 20








PRODUCTION CONDITIONS



DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING PROCESS










HOLDING STAGE











OXIDATION DEGREE














HOLDING TEMPERATURE
HOLDING TIME

OXIDATION
OVERALL
















FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
FIRST
SECOND
DEGREE
OXIDATION



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
ANNEALING
CONTROL
DEGREE


TEST
TI
TII
tI
tII
PI
PII
PI > PII
CONTROL


No.
° C.
° C.
sec
sec









A130
750

75

0.2





A131
820

160

0.5





A132
820

160

0.5





A133
840
940
150
30
 0.55
0.004
Good
Good


B43
820

160

0.5





B44
820

160

0.5





B45
820

3

0.5





B46
820

160

0.5





B47
820

160

0.5





B48










B49
820

160

0.5





B50
820

160

0.5





B51










B52
830

150

0.4





B53
830

150

0.4















PRODUCTION CONDITIONS













INSULATION COATING FORMING PROCESS





HEATING STAGE










AVERAGE HEATING RATE
OXIDATION DEGREE














TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE
TEMPERATURE
















FINAL ANNEALING PROCESS
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
HEATING
RANGE OF
RANGE OF
OXIDATION
















FINAL
FINAL
600 TO
700 TO
RATE
600 TO
700 TO
DEGREE



ANNEALING
ANNEALING
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL
700° C.
800° C.
CONTROL


TEST
TEMPERATURE
TIME
S3
S4
S3 > S4
P3
P4
P3 > P4


No.
° C.
hour
° C./sec
° C./sec









A130
1110
10
15
 8
Good
4.0
4.0



A131
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A132
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



A133
1200
20
100 
10
Good
2.0
1.5
Good


B43
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B44
1200
20
100 
20
Good
1.2
1.2



B45
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B46
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B47
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B48










B49
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B50
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B51










B52
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2



B53
1200
20
60
10
Good
1.2
1.2


















TABLE 21








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A1
2.55
0.030
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




21
0.22


A2
2.74
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0005




25
0.22


A3
2.51
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0003




20
0.22


A4
3.85
0.030
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




28
0.22


A5
2.85
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




25
0.22


A6
2.89
0.320
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




20
0.22


A7
2.75
0.450
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




22
0.22


A8
3.68
0.010
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0004




27
0.22


A9
3.75
0.490
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




25
0.22


A10
2.65
0.330
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




24
0.22


A11
2.85
0.170
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




32
0.22


A12
3.19
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004

0.006


22
0.22


A13
3.18
0.120
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004

0.48 


23
0.22


A14
3.26
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0004


0.01

20
0.22


A15
3.25
0.140
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.0002


0.48

27
0.22


A16
3.18
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.01
25
0.22


A17
3.15
0.150
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.95
26
0.22


A18
3.19
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010



34
0.22


A19
3.21
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




41
0.22

















TABLE 22








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A20
3.25
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




36
0.22


A21
3.18
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002




29
0.22


A22
3.15
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.0002




25
0.22


A23
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005
0.11


28
0.22


A24
3.16
0.075
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002


0.06
0.15
24
0.22


A25
3.15
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010


0.08
33
0.22


A26
3.20
0.091
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.14
0.02

51
0.22


A27
3.15
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.02
0.12
0.03
31
0.22


A28
3.22
0.078
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.33

0.11
27
0.22


A29
3.19
0.065
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005

0.37

34
0.22


A30
3.22
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002
0.0010
0.28
 0.035

28
0.22


B1
3.16
0.060
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002





0.22


B2
3.14
0.040
0.013
0.001
0.001
0.0002





0.22


B3

2.35

0.060
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002





0.22


B4














B5
3.08
0.080
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0001





0.22


B6
3.09
0.050
0.002
0.018
0.001
0.0001





0.22


B7
3.10
0.480
0.002
0.001
0.015
0.0002





0.22


B8
3.24

0.009

0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003





0.22

















TABLE 23








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





B9
3.26

0.520

0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004





0.22


B10
3.19
0.440
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004





0.22


B11














B12
2.55
0.030
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




15
0.22


B13

2.41

0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




18
0.22


B14
2.81
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




19
0.22


B15
2.75
0.450
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




15
0.22


B16
3.71
0.490
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




15
0.22


B17
2.65
0.330
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




18
0.22


A31
2.81
0.170
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.0002




19
0.22


B18
3.12
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.006


25
0.22


B19
3.11
0.120
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.48 


28
0.22


B20
3.15
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002


0.01

28
0.22


B21
3.10
0.150
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.95
29
0.22


B22
3.14
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010



25
0.22


A32
3.12
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




15
0.19


A33
3.14
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




17
0.19


B23
3.16
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




19
0.19


B24
3.09
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




18
0.19

















TABLE 24








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





B25
3.15
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




18
0.19


A34
3.17
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




35
0.19


A35
3.16
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002




36
0.19


A36
3.12
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002




32
0.19


A37
3.14
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002




37
0.19


A38
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




32
0.19


A39
3.15
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




33
0.19


A40
3.18
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




32
0.22


A41
3.24
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




35
0.22


A42
3.26
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




51
0.22


A43
3.16
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005
0.11


33
0.22


A44
3.15
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005
0.11


35
0.22


A45
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0003
0.0005
0.11


42
0.22


A46
3.12
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0010


0.08
36
0.22


A47
3.17
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0010


0.08
39
0.22


A48
3.13
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0010


0.08
42
0.22


A49
3.12
0.091
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0004

0.14
0.02

35
0.22


A50
3.11
0.091
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004

0.14
0.02

45
0.22


A51
3.20
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.02
0.12
0.03
51
0.22

















TABLE 25








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A52
3.14
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002

0.02
0.12
0.03
41
0.22


A53
3.25
0.078
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.33

0.11
35
0.19


A54
3.26
0.065
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005

0.37

36
0.19


A55
3.27
0.065
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005

0.37

41
0.19


A56
3.27
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0010
0.28
 0.035

50
0.19


B26
3.14
0.140
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002


0.48

43
0.22


B27
3.20
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.01
52
0.22


B28
3.15
0.150
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.95
65
0.22


B29
3.12
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010



43
0.22


B30
3.09
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




29
0.22


B31
3.11
0.140
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002


0.48

36
0.22


B32
3.11
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.01
42
0.22


B33
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




51
0.22


A57
3.08
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002




18
0.22


A58
3.09
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




19
0.22


A59
3.14
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




18
0.22


A60
3.12
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




19
0.22


A61
3.13
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002




18
0.22


A62
3.17
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




25
0.22

















TABLE 26








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A63
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




24
0.22


A64
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




25
0.22


A65
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005
0.11


25
0.22


A66
3.11
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005
0.11


28
0.22


A67
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




18
0.19


A68
3.15
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.003
0.0003




17
0.19


A69
3.18
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0004




19
0.19


A70
3.13
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0004




19
0.19


A71
3.12
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




19
0.19


A72
3.12
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




18
0.19


A73
3.14
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




51
0.19


A74
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




38
0.19


A75
3.11
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004
0.0005
0.11


42
0.19


A76
3.16
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004
0.0005
0.11


39
0.19


A77
3.14
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




35
0.19


A78
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0003




35
0.19


A79
3.15
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




37
0.22


A80
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




34
0.19


A81
3.12
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




68
0.22

















TABLE 27








PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE




(UNIT mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED
























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A82
3.11
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005
0.11


34
0.19


A83
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005
0.11


55
0.22


A84
3.11
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004
0.0005
0.11


56
0.19


A85
3.11
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004
0.0010


0.08
71
0.22


A86
3.11
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010


0.08
49
0.19


A87
3.09
0.091
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002

0.14
0.02

35
0.22


A88
3.11
0.091
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.14
0.02

37
0.19


A89
3.14
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.02
0.12
0.03
34
0.22


A90
3.15
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.02
0.12
0.03
68
0.19


A91
3.25
0.078
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004

0.33

0.11
34
0.22


A92
3.25
0.078
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004

0.33

0.11
55
0.19


A93
3.22
0.065
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005

0.37

56
0.22


A94
3.24
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010
0.28
 0.035

71
0.19


A95
3.25
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010
0.28
 0.035

49
0.22


A96
2.51
0.030
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




29
0.19


A97
2.71
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




26
0.19


A98
2.50
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




21
0.19


A99
3.82
0.030
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




35
0.19


A100
2.81
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




22
0.19


















TABLE 28









PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A101
2.87
0.320
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0003




25
0.19


A102
2.77
0.450
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




28
0.19


A103
3.67
0.010
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




37
0.19


A104
3.59
0.490
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




24
0.19


A105
2.58
0.330
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




27
0.19


A106
2.77
0.170
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003




42
0.19


A107
3.12
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

 0.006


34
0.19


A108
3.05
0.120
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.48


26
0.19


A109
3.24
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004


0.01

28
0.19


A110
3.11
0.140
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004


0.48

22
0.19


A111
3.12
0.160
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002



0.01
31
0.19


A112
3.15
0.150
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002



0.95
28
0.19


A113
3.11
0.180
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004
0.0010



33
0.19


A114
3.14
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




55
0.19


A115
3.16
0.052
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




41
0.19


A116
3.11
0.095
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




29
0.19


A117
3.21
0.081
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




26
0.19


A118
3.16
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005
0.11


45
0.19


A119
3.19
0.075
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002


0.06
0.15
28
0.19


















TABLE 29









PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A120
3.15
0.085
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0010


0.08
46
0.19


A121
3.13
0.091
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.0002

0.14
0.02

42
0.19


A122
3.14
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.02
0.12
0.03
38
0.19


A123
3.22
0.078
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003

0.33

0.11
27
0.19


A124
3.29
0.065
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0005

0.37

34
0.19


A125
3.22
0.092
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003
0.0010
0.28
 0.035

26
0.19


B34
3.18
0.060
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003





0.19


B35
3.11
0.040
0.015
0.001
0.001
0.0003





0.19


B36

2.30

0.060
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002





0.19


B37
3.09
0.080
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0001





0.19


B38
3.01
0.050
0.002
0.019
0.001
0.0003





0.19


B39
3.08
0.480
0.002
0.001
0.018
0.0003





0.19


B40
3.14

0.009

0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0001





0.19


B41
3.20

0.520

0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004





0.19


B42
3.20
0.440
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003





0.19


A126
2.55
0.010
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




21
0.23


A127
2.78
0.310
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




20
0.22


A128
3.69
0.490
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




21
0.22


A129
2.51
0.495
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




17
0.22


















TABLE 30









PRODUCTION RESULTS



PRODUCTION RESULTS OF SILICON STEEL SHEET












NUMBER




CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SILICON STEEL SHEET
FRACTION OF COARSE



(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)
SECONDARY RECRYSTALLIZED























ACID-






GRAINS IN SECONDARY
AVERAGE


TEST



SOLUBLE






RECRYSTALLIZED GRAINS
THICKNESS


No.
Si
Mn
C
Al
N
S
Bi
Sn
Cr
Cu
%
mm





A130
2.54
0.080
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




19
0.19


A131
2.71
0.450
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




22
0.22


A132
2.68
0.450
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




23
0.22


A133
3.11
0.051
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002
0.0005
0.11


54
0.19


B43
2.74
0.450
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




22
0.22


B44
2.55

0.001

0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




20
0.23


B45
3.05
0.050

0.210

0.001
0.001
0.0002





0.22


B46
2.97
0.045
0.002

0.072

0.001
0.0003





0.22


B47
3.04
0.055
0.002
0.001

0.022

0.0004





0.22


B48














B49
3.00
0.053
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003


0.53




0.22


B50
2.95
0.045
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0003



0.51



0.22


B51














B52
2.88
0.038
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0002




22
0.22


B53
3.07
0.045
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.0004




28
0.22




















TABLE 31









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE


















A1
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.03

Fair
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A2
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.01

Fair
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A3
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.02

Fair
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A4
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.01

Fair
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A5
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.04

Fair
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A6
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.03

Fair
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A7
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.03

Fair
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A8
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.01

Fair
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A9
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.03

Fair
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A10
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.02

Fair
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A11
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.03

Fair
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A12
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A13
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A14
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A15
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A16
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A17
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.1

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A18
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A19
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 32









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





A20
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A21
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A22
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A23
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.0

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A24
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.7

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A25
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A26
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A27
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.5

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A28
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.2

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A29
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A30
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.9

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


B1






1.65
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B2






1.71
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B3






1.66
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B4







COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B5






1.77
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B6






1.76
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B7






1.75
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B8






1.74
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 33









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





B9






1.72
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B10






1.75
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B11







COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B12

NONE





Poor
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B13

NONE





Poor
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B14

NONE





Poor
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B15

NONE





Poor
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B16

NONE





Poor
1.91
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B17

NONE





Poor
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


A31
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
 0.04

Fair
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


B18

NONE





Poor
1.91
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B19

NONE





Poor
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B20

NONE





Poor
1.93
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B21

NONE





Poor
1.93
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B22

NONE





Poor
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


A32
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A33
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


B23

NONE





Poor
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B24

NONE





Poor
1.91
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 34









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





B25

NONE





Poor
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


A34
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.5

V.G.
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A35
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.9

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A36
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.3

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A37
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A38
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.5

V.G.
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A39
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.8

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A40
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.6

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A41
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.0

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A42
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.4

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A43
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.6

V.G.
1.97
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A44
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.2

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A45
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.8

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A46
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A47
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A48
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.7

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A49
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.8

V.G.
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A50
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A51
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 35









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





A52
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.7

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A53
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.4

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A54
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A55
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.3

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A56
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.6

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


B26

NONE





Bad
1.95
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B27






1.79
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B28

NONE





Bad
1.92
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B29
NONE




Bad
1.91
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B30

NONE





Bad
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B31

NONE





Bad
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B32

NONE





Bad
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B33

NONE





Bad
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


A57
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.1

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A58
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A59
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A60
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A61
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A62
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 36









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





A63
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A64
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.1

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A65
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.8

V.G.
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A66
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.4

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A67
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A68
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.7

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A69
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1

V.G.
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A70
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.5

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A71
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1

V.G.
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A72
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.0

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A73
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.7

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A74
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.7

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A75
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.0

V.G.
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A76
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.3

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A77
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
7.5

Excellent
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A78
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.2

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A79
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
5.6

Excellent
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A80
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
8.9

Excellent
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A81
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
2.5

Excellent
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 37









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





A82
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
5.4

Excellent
1.97
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A83
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
9.3

Excellent
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A84
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
3.3

Excellent
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A85
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
4.8

Excellent
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A86
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
5.1

Excellent
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A87
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
6.9

Excellent
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A88
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
4.2

Excellent
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A89
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
3.8

Excellent
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A90
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
5.4

Excellent
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A91
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
8.7

Excellent
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A92
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.9

V.G.
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A93
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.2

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A94
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.4

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A95
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.8

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A96
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A97
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A98
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A99
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A100
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 38









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





A101
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A102
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A103
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A104
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A105
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A106
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A107
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A108
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.1

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A109
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A110
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A111
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A112
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.1

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A113
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A114
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.97
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A115
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.2

Good
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A116
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.4

Good
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A117
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.3

Good
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A118
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.8

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A119
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.5

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 39









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTANING OXIDE

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE


















A120
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.7

V.G.
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A121
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.6

V.G.
1.95
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A122
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.4

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A123
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.9

V.G.
1.93
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A124
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.6

V.G.
1.94
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A125
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.3

V.G.
1.92
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


B34






1.66
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B35






1.73
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B36






1.55
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B37






1.77
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B38






1.76
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B39






1.75
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B40






1.74
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B41






1.72
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B42






1.75
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


A126
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
0.02

Fair
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A127
EXISTENCE
OTHER
EXISTENCE
0.03

Fair
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A128
EXISTENCE
B
EXISTENCE
0.04

Good
1.91
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A129
EXISTENCE
M
EXISTENCE
0.03

Good
1.89
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE




















TABLE 40









PRODUCTION RESULTS





PRODUCTION RESULTS OF GLASS FILM












Mn-CONTAINING

EVALUATION RESULTS


















TYPE

NUMBER
DIFFRACTED

MAGNETIC





(B:

DENSITY
INTENSITY

FLUX




BRAUNITE)
EXISTENCE
AT
OF IFor

DENSITY


TEST

(M:
AT
INTERFACE
AND ITiN
FILM
B8


No.
EXISTENCE
Mn3O4)
INTERFACE
PIECES/μm2
BY XRD
ADHESION
T
NOTE





A130
EXISTENCE
B & M
NONE


Fair
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A131
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
 0.03
Good
Good
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A132
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
1.1
Good
Good
1.90
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


A133
EXISTENCE
B & M
EXISTENCE
3.5
Good
Excellent
1.96
INVENTIVE EXAMPLE


B43

NONE




Bad
Bad
1.90
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B44

NONE





Bad
1.90
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B45






1.69
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B46






1.73
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B47






1.71
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B48







COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B49






1.70
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B50






1.72
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B51







COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B52

NONE





Poor
1.91
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE


B53

NONE





Bad
1.89
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE









INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the above aspects of the present invention, it is possible to provide the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet excellent in the coating adhesion without deteriorating the magnetic characteristics, and method for producing thereof. Accordingly, the present invention has significant industrial applicability.


REFERENCE SIGNS LIST




  • 1 Grain-oriented electrical steel sheet


  • 11 Silicon steel sheet (base steel sheet)


  • 13 Glass film (primary coating)


  • 131 Mn-containing oxide (Braunite, Mn3O4, or the like)


  • 15 Insulation coating (secondary coating)


Claims
  • 1. A grain-oriented electrical steel sheet comprising: a silicon steel sheet including, as a chemical composition, by mass %,2.50 to 4.0% of Si,0.010 to 0.50% of Mn,0 to 0.20% of C,0 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al,0 to 0.020% of N,0 to 0.080% of S,0 to 0.020% of Bi,0 to 0.50% of Sn,0 to 0.50% of Cr,0 to 1.0% of Cu, anda balance comprising Fe and impurities;a glass film arranged on a surface of the silicon steel sheet; andan insulation coating arranged on a surface of the glass film,wherein the glass film includes a Mn-containing oxide including at least Braunite.
  • 2. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the Mn-containing oxide further includes Mn3O4.
  • 3. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 2, wherein the Mn-containing oxide is arranged at an interface with the silicon steel sheet in the glass film.
  • 4. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 3, wherein 0.1 to 30 pieces/μm2 of the Mn-containing oxide are arranged at the interface in the glass film.
  • 5. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the Mn-containing oxide is arranged at an interface with the silicon steel sheet in the glass film.
  • 6. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 5, wherein 0.1 to 30 pieces/μm2 of the Mn-containing oxide are arranged at the interface in the glass film.
  • 7. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein IFor is a diffracted intensity of a peak originated in a forsterite, and ITiN is a diffracted intensity of a peak originated in a titanium nitride in a range of 41°<2θ<43° of an X-ray diffraction spectrum of the glass film measured by an X-ray diffraction method, andwherein the IFor and the ITiN satisfy: ITiN<IFor.
  • 8. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein a number fraction of secondary recrystallized grains whose maximum diameter is 30 to 100 mm is 20 to 80% as compared with entire secondary recrystallized grains in the silicon steel sheet.
  • 9. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein an average thickness of the silicon steel sheet is 0.17 mm or more and less than 0.22 mm.
  • 10. The grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the silicon steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one comprising0.0001 to 0.0050% of C,0.0001 to 0.0100% of acid-soluble Al,0.0001 to 0.0100% of N,0.0001 to 0.0100% of S,0.0001 to 0.0010% of Bi,0.005 to 0.50% of Sn,0.01 to 0.50% of Cr, and0.01 to 1.0% of Cu.
  • 11. A method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, the method comprising: a hot rolling process of heating a slab to a temperature range of 1200 to 1600° C. and then hot-rolling the slab to obtain a hot rolled steel sheet, the slab including, as the chemical composition, by mass %,2.50 to 4.0% of Si,0.010 to 0.50% of Mn,0 to 0.20% of C,0 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al,0 to 0.020% of N,0 to 0.080% of S,0 to 0.020% of Bi,0 to 0.50% of Sn,0 to 0.50% of Cr,0 to 1.0% of Cu,a balance comprising Fe and impurities;a hot band annealing process of annealing the hot rolled steel sheet to obtain a hot band annealed sheet;a cold rolling process of cold-rolling the hot band annealed sheet by cold-rolling once or by cold-rolling plural times with an intermediate annealing to obtain a cold rolled steel sheet;a decarburization annealing process of decarburization-annealing the cold rolled steel sheet to obtain a decarburization annealed sheet;a final annealing process of applying an annealing separator to the decarburization annealed sheet and then final-annealing the decarburization annealed sheet so as to form a glass film on a surface of the decarburization annealed sheet to obtain a final annealed sheet; andan insulation coating forming process of applying an insulation coating forming solution to the final annealed sheet and then heat-treating the final annealed sheet so as to form an insulation coating on a surface of the final annealed sheet,wherein, in the decarburization annealing process,when a dec-S500-600 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second and a dec-P500-600 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in a temperature range of 500 to 600° C. during raising a temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet and when a dec-S600-700 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second and a dec-P600-700 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in a temperature range of 600 to 700° C. during raising the temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet,the dec-S500-600 is 300 to 2000° C./second,the dec-S600-700 is 300 to 3000° C./second,the dec-S500-600 and the dec-S600-700 satisfy dec-S500-600<dec-S600-700,the dec-P500-600 is 0.00010 to 0.50, andthe dec-P600-700 is 0.00001 to 0.50,wherein, in the final annealing process,the decarburization annealed sheet after applying the annealing separator is held in a temperature range of 1000 to 1300° C. for 10 to 60 hours, andwherein, in the insulation coating forming process,when an ins-S500-600 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second in a temperature range of 600 to 700° C. and an ins-S700-800 is an average heating rate in units of ° C./second in a temperature range of 700 to 800° C. during raising the temperature of the final annealed sheet,the ins-S500-600 is 10 to 200° C./second,the ins-S700-800 is 5 to 100° C./second, andthe ins-S500-600 and the ins-S700-800 satisfy ins-S500-600>ins-S700-800, thereby producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet of claim 1.
  • 12. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 11, wherein, in the decarburization annealing process, the dec-P500-600 and the dec-P600-700 satisfy dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700.
  • 13. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 11, wherein, in the decarburization annealing process, a first annealing and a second annealing are conducted after raising the temperature of the cold rolled steel sheet, andwherein when a dec-TI is a holding temperature in units of ° C., a dec-tI is a holding time in units of second, and a dec-PI is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere during the first annealing and when a dec-TII is a holding temperature in units of ° C., a dec-tII is a holding time in units of second, and a dec-PII is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere during the second annealing,the dec-TI is 700 to 900° C.,the dec-tI is 10 to 1000 seconds,the dec-PI is 0.10 to 1.0,the dec-TII is (dec-TI+50)° C. or more and 1000° C. or less,the dec-tII is 5 to 500 seconds,the dec-PII is 0.00001 to 0.10, andthe dec-PI and the dec-PII satisfy dec-PI>dec-PII.
  • 14. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 13, wherein, in the decarburization annealing process, the dec-P500-600, the dec-P600-700, the dec-PI, and the dec-PII satisfy dec-P500-600>dec-P600-700<dec-PI>dec-PII.
  • 15. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 11, wherein, in the insulation coating forming process,when an ins-P600-700 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in the temperature range of 600 to 700° C. and an ins-P700-800 is an oxidation degree PH2O/PH2 of an atmosphere in the temperature range of 700 to 800° C. during raising the temperature of the final annealed sheet,the ins-P600-700 is 1.0 or more,the ins-P700-800 is 0.1 to 5.0, andthe ins-P600-700 and the ins-P700-800 satisfy ins-P600-700>ins-P700-800.
  • 16. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 11, wherein, in the final annealing process, the annealing separator includes a Ti-compound of 0.5 to 10 mass % in metallic Ti equivalent.
  • 17. The method for producing the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 11, wherein the slab includes, as the chemical composition, by mass %, at least one comprising0.01 to 0.20% of C,0.01 to 0.070% of acid-soluble Al,0.0001 to 0.020% of N,0.005 to 0.080% of S,0.001 to 0.020% of Bi,0.005 to 0.50% of Sn,0.01 to 0.50% of Cr, and0.01 to 1.0% of Cu.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
JP2018-052898 Mar 2018 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2019/011459 3/19/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2019/181945 9/26/2019 WO A
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
20150243419 Senda et al. Aug 2015 A1
20180371576 Park et al. Dec 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
1 279 334 Jun 1972 GB
1279334 Jun 1972 GB
48-37193 Nov 1973 JP
50-71526 Jun 1975 JP
62-133021 Jun 1987 JP
63-7333 Jan 1988 JP
63-310917 Dec 1988 JP
2-240216 Sep 1990 JP
2-259017 Oct 1990 JP
5-295441 Nov 1993 JP
6-33142 Feb 1994 JP
10-212526 Aug 1998 JP
11-61356 Mar 1999 JP
2000-204450 Jul 2000 JP
2003-27194 Jan 2003 JP
2013-108149 Jun 2013 JP
2013108149 Jun 2013 JP
WO 2014049770 Apr 2014 WO
WO 2017105112 Jun 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
“Methods of measurement of the magnetic properties of magnetic steel sheet and strip by means of a single sheet tester”, JIS C 2556, (1996), total of 170 pages.
“Test methods for electrical steel strip and sheet”, JIS C 2550-1, (2011), total of 114 pages.
International Search Report for PCT/JP2019/011459 (PCT/ISA/210) dated May 28, 2019.
Takayama et al., “Quantitative Analysis of Mineral Phases in Sinter Ore by Rietveld Method”, Iron and steel, vol. 103 (2017), No. 6, pp. 397-406.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200399732 A1 Dec 2020 US