Grain oriented electrical steel sheet

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11753691
  • Patent Number
    11,753,691
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 31, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 12, 2023
    8 months ago
Abstract
A grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes the texture aligned with Goss orientation. In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, when (α1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent deviation angles of crystal orientations measured at two measurement points which are adjacent on the sheet surface and which have an interval of 1 mm, the boundary condition BA is defined as |γ2−γ1|≥0.5°, and the boundary condition BB is defined as [(α2−α1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2≥2.0°, the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB is included.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


Priorities are claimed on Japanese Patent Applications: No. 2018-143542, filed on Jul. 31, 2018; No. 2018-143896, filed on Jul. 31, 2018; and No. 2018-143899, filed on Jul. 31, 2018, and the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.


BACKGROUND ART

A grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes 7 mass % or less of Si and has a secondary recrystallized texture which aligns in {110}<001> orientation (Goss orientation). Herein, the {110}<001> orientation represents that {110} plane of crystal is aligned parallel to a rolled surface and <001> axis of crystal is aligned parallel to a rolling direction.


Magnetic characteristics of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet are significantly affected by alignment degree to the {110}<001> orientation. In particular, it is considered that the relationship between the rolling direction of the steel sheet, which is the primal magnetized direction when using the steel sheet, and the <001> direction of crystal, which is the direction of easy magnetization, is important. Thus, in recent years, the practical grain oriented electrical steel sheet is controlled so that an angle formed by the <001> direction of crystal and the rolling direction is within approximately 5°.


It is possible to represent the deviation between the actual crystal orientation of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet and the ideal {110}<001> orientation by three components which are a deviation angle α based on a normal direction Z, a deviation angle β based on a transverse direction C, and a deviation angle γ based on a rolling direction L.



FIG. 1 is a schema illustrating the deviation angle α, the deviation angle f, and the deviation angle γ. As shown in FIG. 1, the deviation angle α is an angle formed by the <001> direction of crystal projected on the rolled surface and the rolling direction L when viewing from the normal direction Z. The deviation angle β is an angle formed by the <001> direction of crystal projected on L cross section (cross section whose normal direction is the transverse direction) and the rolling direction L when viewing from the transverse direction C (width direction of sheet). The deviation angle γ is an angle formed by the <110> direction of crystal projected on C cross section (cross section whose normal direction is the rolling direction) and the normal direction Z when viewing from the rolling direction L.


It is known that, among the deviation angles α, β and γ, the deviation angle β affects magnetostriction. Herein, the magnetostriction is a phenomenon in which a shape of magnetic material changes when magnetic field is applied. Since the magnetostriction causes vibration and noise, it is demanded to reduce the magnetostriction of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet utilized for a core of transformer and the like.


For instance, the patent documents 1 to 3 disclose controlling the deviation angle β. The patent documents 4 and 5 disclose controlling the deviation angle α in addition to the deviation angle β. The patent document 6 discloses a technique for improving the iron loss characteristics by further classifying the alignment degree of crystal orientation using the deviation angle α, the deviation angle β, and the deviation angle γ as indexes.


The patent documents 7 to 9 disclose that not only simply controlling the absolute values and the average values of the deviation angles α, β, and γ but also controlling the fluctuations (deviations) therewith. The patent documents 10 to 12 disclose adding Nb, V, and the like to the grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


In addition to the magnetostriction, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet is demanded to be excellent in magnetic flux density. In the past, it has been proposed to control the grain growth in secondary recrystallization in order to obtain the steel sheet showing high magnetic flux density, as a method and the like. For instance, the patent documents 13 and 14 disclose a method in which the secondary recrystallization is proceeded with giving a thermal gradient to the steel sheet in a tip area of secondary recrystallized grain which is encroaching primary recrystallized grains in final annealing process.


When the secondary recrystallized grain is grown with giving the thermal gradient, the grain growth may be stable, but the grain may be excessively large. When the grain is excessively large, the effect of improving the magnetic flux density may be restricted because of curvature of coil. For instance, the patent document 15 discloses a treatment of suppressing free growth of secondary recrystallized grain which nucleates in an initial stage of secondary recrystallization when the secondary recrystallization is proceeded with giving the thermal gradient (for instance, a treatment to add mechanical strain to edges of width direction of the steel sheet).


RELATED ART DOCUMENTS
Patent Documents



  • [Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2001-294996

  • [Patent Document 2] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2005-240102

  • [Patent Document 3] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2015-206114

  • [Patent Document 4] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2004-060026

  • [Patent Document 5] PCT International Publication No. WO2016/056501

  • [Patent Document 6] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2007-314826

  • [Patent Document 7] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2001-192785

  • [Patent Document 8] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2005-240079

  • [Patent Document 9] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. 2012-052229

  • [Patent Document 10] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S52-024116

  • [Patent Document 11] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H02-200732

  • [Patent Document 12] Japanese Patent (Granted) Publication No. 4962516

  • [Patent Document 13] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S57-002839

  • [Patent Document 14] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. S61-190017

  • [Patent Document 15] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No. H02-258923



SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem to be Solved

The grain oriented electrical steel sheet is utilized as an iron core material for various transformers. For instance, in a relatively small transformer such as a pole transformer, it is requested to make the transformer even smaller. Along with this, it is requested to make the grain oriented electrical steel sheet have excellent cope with a high magnetic field range. Thus, it is necessary to further improve the magnetic characteristics in high magnetic field.


As a result of investigations by the present inventors, although the conventional techniques disclosed in the patent documents 1 to 9 controls the crystal orientation, it is insufficient to reduce the magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Moreover, since the conventional techniques disclosed in the patent documents 10 to 12 merely contain Nb and V, it is insufficient to reduce the magnetostriction in high magnetic field. The conventional techniques disclosed in the patent documents 13 to 15 not only entail productivity problems, but are insufficient in reducing the magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


The present invention has been made in consideration of the situations such that it is required to reduce the magnetostriction for the grain oriented electrical steel sheet. An object of the invention is to provide the grain oriented electrical steel sheet in which the magnetostriction is improved. Specifically, the object of the invention is to provide the grain oriented electrical steel sheet in which the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range (especially in magnetic field where excited so as to be approximately 1.9 T) is improved.


Solution to Problem

An aspect of the present invention employs the following.


(1) A grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to an aspect of the present invention includes, as a chemical composition, by mass %,


2.0 to 7.0% of Si,


0 to 0.030% of Nb,


0 to 0.030% of V,


0 to 0.030% of Mo,


0 to 0.030% of Ta,


0 to 0.030% of W,


0 to 0.0050% of C,


0 to 1.0% of Mn,


0 to 0.0150% of S,


0 to 0.0150% of Se,


0 to 0.0650% of Al,


0 to 0.0050% of N,


0 to 0.40% of Cu,


0 to 0.010% of Bi,


0 to 0.080% of B,


0 to 0.50% of P,


0 to 0.0150% of Ti,


0 to 0.10% of Sn,


0 to 0.10% of Sb,


0 to 0.30% of Cr,


0 to 1.0% of Ni, and


a balance consisting of Fe and impurities, and


comprising a texture aligned with Goss orientation, characterized in that,


when α is defined as a deviation angle from an ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a normal direction Z,


β is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a transverse direction C,


γ is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a rolling direction L,


1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent deviation angles of crystal orientations measured at two measurement points which are adjacent on a sheet surface and which have an interval of 1 mm,


a boundary condition BA is defined as |γ2−γ1|≥0.5°, and


a boundary condition BB is defined as [(α2−α1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2≥2.0°,


a boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB is included.


(2) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to (1),


when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L and


a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L,


the grain size RAL and the grain size RBL may satisfy 1.10≤RBL÷RAL.


(3) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to (1) or (2),


when a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C and


a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC may satisfy 1.10≤RBC÷RAC.


(4) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (3),


when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L and


a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC may satisfy 1.15≤RAC÷RAL.


(5) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (4),


when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L and


a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC may satisfy 1.50≤RBC÷RBL.


(6) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (5),


when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L,


a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L,


a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C, and


a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RAL, the grain size RAC, the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC may satisfy (RBC×RAL)÷(RBL×RAC)<1.0.


(7) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (6),


when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L and


a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC may be 22 mm or larger.


(8) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (7),


when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L and


a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RAL may be 30 mm or smaller and the grain size RAC may be 400 mm or smaller.


(9) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (8),


σ(|γ|) which is a standard deviation of an absolute value of the deviation angle γ may be 0° to 3.50°.


(10) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (9),


the grain oriented electrical steel sheet may include, as the chemical composition, at least one selected from a group consisting of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, and


an amount thereof may be 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.


(11) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (10),


a magnetic domain may be refined by at least one of applying a local minute strain and forming a local groove.


(12) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (11),


an intermediate layer may be arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet and


an insulation coating may be arranged in contact with the intermediate layer.


(13) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (12),


the intermediate layer may be a forsterite film with an average thickness of 1 to 3 μm.


(14) In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to any one of (1) to (13),


the intermediate layer may be an oxide layer with an average thickness of 2 to 500 nm.


Effects of Invention

According to the above aspects of the present invention, it is possible to obtain the grain oriented electrical steel sheet in which the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range (especially in magnetic field where excited so as to be approximately 1.9 T) is improved.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schema illustrating deviation angle α, deviation angle β, and deviation angle γ.



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional illustration of a grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a method for producing a grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, a preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail. However, the present invention is not limited only to the configuration which is disclosed in the present embodiment, and various modifications are possible without departing from the aspect of the present invention. In addition, the limitation range as described below includes a lower limit and an upper limit thereof. However, the value represented by “more than” or “less than” does not include in the limitation range. Unless otherwise noted, “%” of the chemical composition represents “mass %”.


In general, in order to reduce the magnetostriction, the crystal orientation has been controlled so that the deviation angle β becomes low (specifically, maximum and average of absolute value |β| of deviation angle β become small). In fact, in the magnetic field range excited so as to be approximately 1.7 T where the magnetic characteristics are measured in general (hereinafter, it may be simply referred to as “middle magnetic field range”), it has been confirmed that the correlation between the deviation angle β and the magnetostriction is relatively high.


In addition, the present inventors have detailedly investigated the relationship between the crystal orientation and the magnetostriction in regard to the materials with relatively excellent magnetostriction characteristics. As a result, it is found that the magnetostriction is influenced by the deviation angle γ in addition to the deviation angle β. In particular, the present inventors have investigated the situation in which the deviation angle γ improves the magnetostriction, and as a result, have found that it is possible to evaluate the above behavior by using “the difference between the minimum and the maximum of magnetostriction” which is the amount of magnetic strain at 1.9 T (hereinafter, it may be referred to as “λp-p@1.9 T”). Moreover, the present inventors have thought that it is possible to further reduce the noise of transformer by optimally controlling the above behavior.


In the past, in the grain-oriented electrical steel sheet, it has been prioritized that the <001> orientation which is the easy axis of magnetization aligns the rolling direction, and it has been considered that the deviation angle γ caused by the crystal rotation around the rolling direction L has little influence on the magnetic characteristics. Thus, the typical grain oriented electrical steel sheet has been produced under conditions such that, in regard to mainly the deviation angle α and the deviation angle β, the secondary recrystallized grain is nucleated with precisely controlling the orientation and is grown with maintaining the crystal orientation. In general, it has been considered that it is difficult to precisely control the deviation angle γ, in addition to controlling the deviation angle α and the deviation angle β as mentioned above.


The present inventors have attempted that the secondary recrystallized grain is not grown with maintaining the crystal orientation, but is grown with changing the crystal orientation. As a result, the present inventors have found that, in order to reduce the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range, it is advantageous to sufficiently induce orientation changes which are local and low-angle and which are not conventionally recognized as boundary during the growth of secondary recrystallized grain, and to divide one secondary recrystallized grain into small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different.


In addition, the present inventors have found that, in order to control the above orientation changes, it is important to consider a factor to easily induce the orientation changes itself and a factor to periodically induce the orientation changes within one grain. In order to easily induce the orientation changes itself, it has been found that starting the secondary recrystallization from lower temperature is effective, for instance, by controlling the grain size of the primary recrystallized grain or by utilizing elements such as Nb. Moreover, it has been found that the orientation changes can be periodically induced up to higher temperature within one grain during the secondary recrystallization by utilizing AlN and the like which are the conventional inhibitor at appropriate temperature and in appropriate atmosphere.


First Embodiment

In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the secondary recrystallized grain is divided into plural domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different. Specifically, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes the local and low-angle boundary which divides the inside of secondary recrystallized grain, in addition to the comparatively high-angle boundary which corresponds to the grain boundary of secondary recrystallized grain.


Specifically, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes, as a chemical composition, by mass %,


2.0 to 7.0% of Si,


0 to 0.030% of Nb,


0 to 0.030% of V,


0 to 0.030% of Mo,


0 to 0.030% of Ta,


0 to 0.030% of W,


0 to 0.0050% of C,


0 to 1.0% of Mn,


0 to 0.0150% of S,


0 to 0.0150% of Se,


0 to 0.0650% of Al,


0 to 0.0050% of N,


0 to 0.40% of Cu,


0 to 0.010% of Bi,


0 to 0.080% of B,


0 to 0.50% of P,


0 to 0.0150% of Ti,


0 to 0.10% of Sn,


0 to 0.10% of Sb,


0 to 0.30% of Cr,


0 to 1.0% of Ni, and


a balance consisting of Fe and impurities, and


includes a texture aligned with Goss orientation.


When α is defined as a deviation angle from an ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a normal direction Z,


β is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a transverse direction C (width direction of sheet),


γ is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a rolling direction L,


1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent deviation angles of crystal orientations measured at two measurement points which are adjacent on a sheet surface and which have an interval of 1 mm,


a boundary condition BA is defined as |γ2−γ1|≥0.5°, and


a boundary condition BB is defined as [(α2−α1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2≥2.0°,


the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes a boundary (a boundary dividing an inside of secondary recrystallized grain) which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB, in addition to a boundary (a boundary corresponding to the grain boundary of secondary recrystallized grain) which satisfies the boundary condition BB.


The boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB substantially corresponds to the grain boundary of secondary recrystallized grain which is observed when the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet is macro-etched. In addition to the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes, at a relatively high frequency, the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB. The boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB corresponds to the local and low-angle boundary which divides the inside of secondary recrystallized grain. Specifically, in the present embodiment, the secondary recrystallized grain becomes the state of being finely divided into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different.


The conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet may include the secondary recrystallized grain boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB. Moreover, the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet may include the shift of the deviation angle γ in the secondary recrystallized grain. However, in the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet, since the deviation angle γ tends to shift continuously in the secondary recrystallized grain, the shift of the deviation angle γ in the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet hardly satisfies the boundary condition BA.


For instance, in the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet, it may be possible to detect the long range shift of the deviation angle γ in the secondary recrystallized grain, but it is hard to detect the short range shift of the deviation angle γ in the secondary recrystallized grain (it is hard to satisfy the boundary condition BA), because the local shift is slight. On the other hand, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, the deviation angle γ locally shifts in short range, and thus, the shift thereof can be detected as the boundary. Specifically, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes, at a relatively high frequency, the shift where the value of |γ2−γ1| is 0.5° or more, between the two measurement points which are adjacent in the secondary recrystallized grain and which have the interval of 1 mm.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB (the boundary which divides the inside of secondary recrystallized grain) is purposely elaborated by optimally controlling the production conditions as described later. In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, the secondary recrystallized grain becomes the state such that the grain is divided into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different, and thus, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range is reduced.


Hereinafter, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment is described in detail.


1. Crystal Orientation


The notation of crystal orientation in the present embodiment is described.


In the present embodiment, the {110}<001> orientation is distinguished into two orientations which are “actual {110}<001> orientation” and “ideal {110}<001> orientation”. The above reason is that, in the present embodiment, it is necessary to distinguish between the {110}<001> orientation representing the crystal orientation of the practical steel sheet and the {110}<001> orientation representing the academic crystal orientation.


In general, in the measurement of the crystal orientation of the practical steel sheet after recrystallization, the crystal orientation is determined without strictly distinguishing the misorientation of approximately ±2.5°. In the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet, the “{110}<001> orientation” is regarded as the orientation range within approximately ±2.5° centered on the geometrically ideal {110}<001> orientation. On the other hand, in the present embodiment, it is necessary to accurately distinguish the misorientation of ±2.5° or less.


Thus, in the present embodiment, although the simply “{110}<001> orientation (Goss orientation)” is utilized as conventional for expressing the actual orientation of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, the “ideal {110}<001> orientation (ideal Goss orientation)” is utilized for expressing the geometrically ideal {110}<001> orientation, in order to avoid the confusion with the {110}<001> orientation used in conventional publication.


For instance, in the present embodiment, the explanation such that “the {110}<001> orientation of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment is deviated by 2° from the ideal {110}<001> orientation” may be included.


In addition, in the present embodiment, the following four angles α, β, γ and ϕ are used, which relates to the crystal orientation identified in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


Deviation angle α: a deviation angle from the ideal {110}<001> orientation around the normal direction Z, which is identified in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


Deviation angle β: a deviation angle from the ideal {110}<001> orientation around the transverse direction C, which is identified in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


Deviation angle γ: a deviation angle from the ideal {110}<001> orientation around the rolling direction L, which is identified in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


A schema illustrating the deviation angle α, the deviation angle β, and the deviation angle γ is shown in FIG. 1.


Angle ϕ: an angle obtained by ϕ=[(α2−α1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2, when (α1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent the deviation angles of the crystal orientations measured at two measurement points which are adjacent on the rolled surface of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet and which have the interval of 1 mm.


The angle ϕ may be referred to as “three-dimensional misorientation”.


2. Grain Boundary of Grain Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, in particular, a local orientation change is utilized in order to control the deviation angle γ. Herein, the above local orientation change corresponds to the orientation change which occurs during the growth of secondary recrystallized grain and which is not conventionally recognized as the boundary because the amount of change thereof is slight. Hereinafter, the above orientation change which occurs so as to divide one secondary recrystallized grain into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different may be referred to as “switching”.


Moreover, the boundary considering the misorientation of the deviation angle γ (the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA) may be referred to as “γ subboundary”, and the grain segmented by using the γ subboundary as the boundary may be referred to as “γ subgrain”.


Moreover, hereinafter, the magnetostriction (μp-p@1.9 T) in magnetic field where excited so as to be 1.9 T which is the characteristic related to the present embodiment may be referred to as simply “magnetostriction in high magnetic field”.


It seems that the above switching has the orientation change of approximately 1° (lower than 2°) and occurs during growing the secondary recrystallized grain. Although the details are explained below in connection with the producing method, it is important to grow the secondary recrystallized grain under conditions such that the switching easily occurs. For instance, it is important to initiate the secondary recrystallization from a relatively low temperature by controlling the grain size of the primary recrystallized grain and to maintain the secondary recrystallization up to higher temperature by controlling the type and amount of the inhibitor.


The reason why the control of the deviation angle γ influences the magnetostriction in high magnetic field is not entirely clear, but is presumed as follows.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet where the secondary recrystallization is finished, the crystal orientation is controlled to be the Goss orientation. However, in actuality, the crystal orientations of the grains in contact with a grain boundary are slightly different. Thus, when the grain oriented electrical steel sheet is excited, a special magnetic domain (closure domain) is induced near the grain boundary for adjusting the magnetic domain structure. In the closure domain, the magnetic moments in the magnetic domain are hardly aligned with the direction of the external magnetic field. Thus, the closure domain remains even in high magnetic field range during the magnetization process, and the domain wall motion is suppressed. On the other hand, if it is possible to suppress the formation of the closure domain near the grain boundary, it seems that the magnetization easily proceeds in the entire steel sheet even in the high magnetic field range, and as a result, that the magnetostriction is reduced. Although the closure domain is induced near the grain boundary due to the discontinuity of crystal orientation, in the present embodiment, it seems that the orientation change near the grain boundary becomes gradual due to the relatively gradual orientation change derived from the switching, and as a result, that the formation of the closure domain is suppressed.


In the present embodiment, with respect to the orientation change including the switching, two types of boundary conditions are defined. In the present embodiment, it is important to define the “boundary” with using these boundary conditions.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet which is practically produced, the deviation angle between the rolling direction and the <001> direction is controlled to be approximately 5° or less. Also, the above control is conducted in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment. Thus, for the definition of the “boundary” of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, it is not possible to use the general definition of the grain boundary (high angle tilt boundary) which is “a boundary where the misorientation with the adjoining region is 15° or more”. For instance, in the conventional grain oriented electrical steel sheet, the grain boundary is revealed by the macro-etching of the steel surface, and the misorientation between both sides of the grain boundary is approximately 2 to 3° in general.


In the present embodiment, as described later, it is necessary to accurately define the boundary between the crystals. Thus, for identifying the boundary, the method which is based on the visual evaluation such as the macro-etching is not adopted.


In the present embodiment, for identifying the boundary, a measurement line including at least 500 measurement points with 1 mm intervals on the rolled surface is arranged, and the crystal orientations are measured. For instance, the crystal orientation may be measured by the X-ray diffraction method (Laue method). The Laue method is the method such that X-ray beam is irradiated the steel sheet with and that the diffraction spots which are transmitted or reflected are analyzed. By analyzing the diffraction spots, it is possible to identify the crystal orientation at the point irradiated with X-ray beam. Moreover, by changing the irradiated point and by analyzing the diffraction spots in plural points, it is possible to obtain the distribution of the crystal orientation based on each irradiated point. The Laue method is the preferred method for identifying the crystal orientation of the metallographic structure in which the grains are coarse.


The measurement points for the crystal orientation may be at least 500 points. It is preferable that the number of measurement points appropriately increases depending on the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain. For instance, when the number of secondary recrystallized grains included in the measurement line is less than 10 grains in a case where the number of measurement points for identifying the crystal orientation is 500 points, it is preferable to extend the above measurement line by increasing the measurement points with 1 mm intervals so as to include 10 grains or more of the secondary recrystallized grains in the measurement line.


The crystal orientations are identified at each measurement point with 1 mm interval on the rolled surface, and then, the deviation angle α, the deviation angle β, and the deviation angle γ are identified at each measurement point. Based on the identified deviation angles at each measurement point, it is judged whether or not the boundary is included between two adjacent measurement points. Specifically, it is judged whether or not the two adjacent measurement points satisfy the boundary condition BA and/or the boundary condition BB.


Specifically, when (α1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent the deviation angles of the crystal orientations measured at two adjacent measurement points, the boundary condition BA is defined as |γ2−γ1|≥0.5°, and the boundary condition BB is defined as [(β2−α1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2≥2.0°. Furthermore, it is judged whether or not the boundary satisfying the boundary condition BA and/or the boundary condition BB is included between two adjacent measurement points.


The boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB results in the three-dimensional misorientation (the angle ϕ) of 2.0° or more between two points across the boundary, and it can be said that the boundary corresponds to the conventional grain boundary of the secondary recrystallized grain which is revealed by the macro-etching.


In addition to the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes, at a relatively high frequency, the boundary intimately relating to the “switching”, specifically the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB. The boundary defined above corresponds to the boundary which divides one secondary recrystallized grain into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different.


The above two types of the boundaries may be determined by using different measurement data. However, in consideration of the complication of measurement and the discrepancy from actual state caused by the different data, it is preferable to determine the above two types of the boundaries by using the deviation angles of the crystal orientations obtained from the same measurement line (at least 500 measurement points with 1 mm intervals on the rolled surface).


The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes, at a relatively high frequency, the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB, in addition to the existence of boundaries which satisfy the boundary condition BB. Thereby, the secondary recrystallized grain becomes the state such that the grain is divided into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different, and thus, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range is reduced.


Moreover, in the present embodiment, the steel sheet only has to include “the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB”. However, in practice, in order to reduce the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range, it is preferable to include, at a relatively high frequency, the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB.


For instance, in the present embodiment, the secondary recrystallized grain is divided into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different, and thus, it is preferable that the γ subboundary is included at a relatively high frequency as compared with the conventional grain boundary of the secondary recrystallized grain.


Specifically, when the crystal orientations are measured on at least 500 measurement points with 1 mm intervals on the rolled surface, when the deviation angles are identified at each measurement point, and when the boundary conditions are applied to two adjacent measurement points, the “boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA” may be included at a ratio of 1.10 times or more as compared with the “boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB”. Specifically, when the boundary conditions are applied as explained above, the value of dividing the number of the “boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA” by the number of the “boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB” may be 1.10 or more. In the present embodiment, when the above value is 1.10 or more, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet is judged to include “the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB”.


The upper limit of the value of dividing the number of the “boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA” by the number of the “boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB” is not particularly limited. For instance, the value may be 80 or less, may be 40 or less, or may be 30 or less.


Second Embodiment

Next, a grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to second embodiment of the present invention is described below. In addition, in the following explanation of each embodiment, the differences from the first embodiment are mainly described, and the duplicated explanations of other features which are the same as those in the first embodiment are omitted.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the second embodiment of the present invention, a grain size of the γ subgrain in the rolling direction is smaller than the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain in the rolling direction. Specifically, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes the γ subgrain and the secondary recrystallized grain, and the grain sizes thereof are controlled in the rolling direction.


Specifically, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L and when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L,


the grain size RAL and the grain size RBL satisfy 1.10≤RBL÷RAL. Moreover, it is preferable that RBL÷RAL≤80.


The above feature represents the state of the existence of the “switching” in the rolling direction. In other words, the above feature represents the situation such that, in the secondary recrystallized grain having the grain boundary satisfying that the angle ϕ is 2° or more, the grain having at least one boundary satisfying that |γ2−γ1| is 0.5° or more and that the angle ϕ is less than 2° is included at an appropriate frequency along the rolling direction. In the present embodiment, the above switching situation is evaluated and judged by using the grain size RAL and the grain size RBL in the rolling direction.


When the grain size RBL is small, or when the grain size RAL is large because the grain size RBL is large but the switching is insufficient, the value of RBL/RAL becomes less than 1.10. When the value of RBL/RAL becomes less than 1.10, the switching may be insufficient, and the magnetostriction in high magnetic field may not be sufficiently improved. The value of RBL/RAL is preferably 1.30 or more, is more preferably 1.50 or more, is further more preferably 2.0 or more, is further more preferably 3.0 or more, and is further more preferably 5.0 or more.


The upper limit of the value of RBL/RAL is not particularly limited. When the switching occurs sufficiently and the value of RBL/RAL, becomes large, the continuity of the crystal orientation increases in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as a whole, which is preferable for the improvement of the magnetostriction. On the other hand, the switching causes residual lattice defects in the grain. When the switching occurs excessively, it is concerned that the improvement effect on the iron loss may decrease. Thus, the upper limit of the value of RBL/RAL may be practically 80. When the iron loss is needed to be considered in particular, the upper limit of the value of RBL/RAL is preferably 40, and is more preferably 30.


Herein, there is a case such that the value of RBL/RAL becomes less than 1.0. The RBL, is the average grain size in the rolling direction which is defined based on the boundary where the angle ϕ is 2° or more, whereas the RAL is the average grain size in the rolling direction which is defined based on the boundary where |γ2−γ1| is 0.5° or more. When considering simply, it seems that the boundary where the lower limit of the misorientation is lower is detected more frequently. In other words, it seems that the RBL is always larger than the RAL and that the value of RBL/RAL is always 1.0 or more.


However, since the RBL is the grain size which is obtained from the boundary based on the angle ϕ and the RAL, is the grain size which is obtained from the boundary based on the deviation angle γ, the RBL and the RAL differ in the definition of grain boundaries for obtaining the grain sizes. Thus, the value of RBL/RAL may be less than 1.0.


For instance, even when |γ2−γ1| is less than 0.5° (e.g., 0°), as long as the deviation angle α and/or the deviation angle β are large, the angle ϕ becomes sufficiently large. In other words, there is a case such that the boundary where the boundary condition BA is not satisfied but the boundary condition BB is satisfied exists. When the above boundary increases, the value of the RBL decreases, and as a result, the value of RBL/RAL may be less than 1.0. In the present embodiment, each condition is controlled so that the switching with respect to the deviation angle γ occurs more frequently. When the control of the switching is insufficient and the gap from the desired condition of the present embodiment is large, the change with respect to the deviation angle γ does not occur, and the value of RBL/RAL is less than 1.0. In the present embodiment, as mentioned above, it is necessary to sufficiently increase in the occurrence frequency of the γ subboundary and to control the value of RBL/RAL to 1.10 or more.


Herein, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, a misorientation between two measurement points which are adjacent on the sheet surface and which have the interval of 1 mm is classified into case 1 to case 4 shown in Table 1. The above RBL is determined based on the boundary satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 2 shown in Table 1, and the above RAL is determined based on the boundary satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 3 shown in Table 1. For instance, the deviation angles of the crystal orientations are measured on the measurement line including at least 500 measurement points along the rolling direction, and the RBL is determined as the average length of the line segment between the boundaries satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 2 on the measurement line. In the same way, the RAL is determined as the average length of the line segment between the boundaries satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 3 on the measurement line.













TABLE 1






CASE 1
CASE 2
CASE 3
CASE 4







BOUNDARY
0.5°
LESS
0.5°
LESS


CONDITION
OR
THAN
OR
THAN


BA
MORE
0.5°
MORE
0.5°


BOUNDARY
2.0°
2.0°
LESS
LESS


CONDITION
OR
OR
THAN
THAN


BB
MORE
MORE
2.0°
2.0°


TYPE
“GENERAL GRAIN
“GENERAL GRAIN
“γ SUBBOUNDARY”
NOT BOUNDARY


OF
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY

SPECIFICALLY, NOT


BOUNDARY
OF SEONDARY
OF SECONDARY

“GENERAL GRAIN



RECRYSTALLIZED
RECRYSTALLIZED

BOUNDARY OF



GRAIN WHICH IS
GRAIN WHICH IS

SECONDARY



CONVENTIONALLY
CONVENTIONALLY

RECRYSTALLIZED



OBSERVED”
OBSERVED”

GRAIN WHICH IS



AND


CONVENTIONALLY



“γ SUBBOUNDARY”


OBSERVED”






AND NOT






“γ SUBBOUNDARY”









The reason why the control of the value of RBL/RAL influences the magnetostriction in high magnetic field is not entirely clear, but is presumed as follows. It seems that the switching (local orientation change) occurs within one secondary recrystallized grain and makes the relative misorientation with the adjoining grain decrease (makes the orientation change be gradual near the grain boundary), and as a result, that the formation of the closure domain is suppressed.


Third Embodiment

Next, a grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to third embodiment of the present invention is described below. In the following explanation, the differences from the above embodiments are mainly described, and the duplicated descriptions are omitted.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the third embodiment of the present invention, a grain size of the γ subgrain in the transverse direction is smaller than the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain in the transverse direction. Specifically, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes the γ subgrain and the secondary recrystallized grain, and the grain sizes thereof are controlled in the transverse direction.


Specifically, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, when a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C and a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C, the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC satisfy 1.10≤RBC÷RAC. Moreover, it is preferable that RBC÷RAC≤80.


The above feature represents the state of the existence of the “switching” in the transverse direction. In other words, the above feature represents the situation such that, in the secondary recrystallized grain having the grain boundary satisfying that the angle ϕ is 2° or more, the grain having at least one boundary satisfying that |γ2−γ1| is 0.5° or more and that the angle ϕ is less than 2° is included at an appropriate frequency along the transverse direction. In the present embodiment, the above switching situation is evaluated and judged by using the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC in the transverse direction.


When the grain size RBC is small, or when the grain size RAC is large because the grain size RBC is large but the switching is insufficient, the value of RBC/RAC becomes less than 1.10. When the value of RBC/RAC becomes less than 1.10, the switching may be insufficient, and the magnetostriction in high magnetic field may not be sufficiently improved. The value of RBC/RAC is preferably 1.30 or more, is more preferably 1.50 or more, is further more preferably 2.0 or more, is further more preferably 3.0 or more, and is further more preferably 5.0 or more.


The upper limit of the value of RBC/RAC is not particularly limited. When the switching occurs sufficiently and the value of RBC/RAC becomes large, the continuity of the crystal orientation increases in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as a whole, which is preferable for the improvement of the magnetostriction. On the other hand, the switching causes residual lattice defects in the grain. When the switching occurs excessively, it is concerned that the improvement effect on the iron loss may decrease. Thus, the upper limit of the value of RBC/RAC may be practically 80. When the iron loss is needed to be considered in particular, the upper limit of the value of RBC/RAC is preferably 40, and is more preferably 30.


Herein, since the RBC is the grain size which is obtained from the boundary based on the angle ϕ and the RAC is the grain size which is obtained from the boundary based on the deviation angle γ, the RBC and the RAC differ in the definition of grain boundaries for obtaining the grain sizes. Thus, the value of RBC/RAC may be less than 1.0.


The above RBC is determined based on the boundary satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 2 shown in Table 1, and the above RAC is determined based on the boundary satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 3 shown in Table 1. For instance, the deviation angles of the crystal orientations are measured on the measurement line including at least 500 measurement points along the transverse direction, and the RBC is determined as the average length of the line segment between the boundaries satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 2 on the measurement line. In the same way, the RAC is determined as the average length of the line segment between the boundaries satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 3 on the measurement line.


The reason why the control of the value of RBC/RAC influences the magnetostriction in high magnetic field is not entirely clear, but is presumed as follows. It seems that the switching (local orientation change) occurs within one secondary recrystallized grain and makes the relative misorientation with the adjoining grain decrease (makes the orientation change be gradual near the grain boundary), and as a result, that the formation of the closure domain is suppressed.


Fourth Embodiment

Next, a grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to fourth embodiment of the present invention is described below. In the following explanation, the differences from the above embodiments are mainly described, and the duplicated descriptions are omitted.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention, the grain size of the γ subgrain in the rolling direction is smaller than the grain size of the γ subgrain in the transverse direction. Specifically, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes the γ subgrain, and the grain size thereof is controlled in the rolling direction and the transverse direction.


Specifically, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L and a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C,


the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC satisfy 1.15≤RAC÷RAL. Moreover, it is preferable that RAC÷RAL≤10.


Hereinafter, the shape of the grain may be referred to as “anisotropy (in-plane)” or “oblate (shape)”. The above shape of the grain corresponds to the shape when observed from the surface (rolled surface) of the steel sheet. Specifically, the above shape of the grain does not consider the size in the thickness direction (the shape observed in the thickness cross section). Incidentally, in the sheet thickness direction, almost all the grains in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet have the same size as the thickness of the steel sheet. In other words, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, one grain usually occupies the thickness of the steel sheet except for a peculiar region such as the vicinity of the grain boundary.


The value of RAC/RAL mentioned above represents the state of the existence of the “switching” in the rolling direction and the transverse direction. In other words, the above feature represents the situation such that the frequency of local orientation change which corresponds to the switching varies depending on the in-plane direction of the steel sheet. In the present embodiment, the above switching situation is evaluated and judged by using the grain size RAC and the grain size RAL in two directions orthogonal to each other in the plane of the steel sheet.


The state such that the value RAC/RAL is more than 1 indicates that the γ subgrain regulated by the switching has averagely the oblate shape which is elongated to the transverse direction and which is compressed to the rolling direction. Specifically, it is indicated that the shape of the grain regulated by the γ subboundary is anisotropic.


The reason why the magnetostriction in high magnetic field is improved by controlling the shape of the γ subgrain to be anisotropic in plane is not entirely clear, but is presumed as follows. As described above, when the 180° domain wall motions in high magnetic field, the “continuity” with the adjoining grain is important. For instance, in a case where one secondary recrystallized grain is divided into the small domains by the switching and where the number of the domains is the same (the area of the domains is the same), the abundance ratio of the boundary (the γ subboundary) resulted from the switching becomes high when the shape of the small domains is anisotropic rather than isotropic. Specifically, it seems that, by controlling the value of RAC/RAL, the occurrence frequency of the switching which is the local orientation change increases, and thus, the continuity of the crystal orientation increases in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as a whole.


It seems that the anisotropy when the switching occurs is caused by the following anisotropy included in the steel sheet before the secondary recrystallization: for instance, the anisotropy of shape of primary recrystallized grains; the anisotropy of distribution (distribution like colony) of crystal orientation of primary recrystallized grains due to the anisotropy of shape of hot-rolled grains; the arrangement of precipitates elongated by hot rolling and precipitates fractured and aligned in the rolling direction; the distribution of precipitates varied by fluctuation of thermal history in width direction and in longitudinal direction of coil; or the anisotropy of distribution of grain size. The details of occurrence mechanism are not clear. However, when the steel sheet during the secondary recrystallization is under the condition with the thermal gradient, the grain growth (dislocation annihilation and boundary formation) is directly anisotropic. Specifically, the thermal gradient in the secondary recrystallization is very effective condition for controlling the anisotropy which is the feature of the present embodiment. The details are explained below in connection with the producing method.


As related to the process for controlling the anisotropy by the thermal gradient during the secondary recrystallization as described above, it is preferable that the direction to elongate the γ subgrain in the present embodiment is the transverse direction when considering the typical producing method at present. In the case, the grain size RAL in the rolling direction is smaller than the grain size RAC in the transverse direction. The relationship between the rolling direction and the transverse direction is explained below in connection with the producing method. Herein, the direction to elongate the γ subgrain is determined not by the thermal gradient but by the occurrence frequency of the γ subboundary.


When the grain size RAC is small, or when the grain size RAL is large but the grain size RAC is large, the value of RAC/RAL becomes less than 1.15. When the value of RAC/RAL becomes less than 1.15, the switching may be insufficient, and the magnetostriction in high magnetic field may not be sufficiently improved. The value of RAC/RAL is preferably 1.50 or more, is more preferably 1.80 or more, and is further more preferably 2.10 or more.


The upper limit of the value of RAC/RAL is not particularly limited. When the occurrence frequency of the switching and the elongation direction are limited to the specific direction and the value of RAC/RAL becomes large, the continuity of the crystal orientation increases in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as a whole, which is preferable for the improvement of the magnetostriction. On the other hand, the switching causes residual lattice defects in the grain. When the switching occurs excessively, it is concerned that the improvement effect on the iron loss may decrease. Thus, the upper limit of the value of RAC/RAL may be practically 10. When the iron loss is needed to be considered in particular, the upper limit of the value of RAC/RAL is preferably 6, and is more preferably 4.


In addition to controlling the value of RAC/RAL, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, as with the second embodiment, it is preferable that the grain size RAL and the grain size RBL satisfy 1.10≤RBL÷RAL.


The above feature clarifies that the “switching” has occurred. For instance, the grain size RAC and the grain size RAL are the grain sizes based on the boundaries where |γ2−γ1| is 0.5° or more, between two adjacent measurement points. Even when the “switching” does not occur at all and the angles ϕ of all boundaries are 2.0° or more, the above value of RAC/RAL may be satisfied. Even when the value of RAC/RAL is satisfied, when the angles ϕ of all boundaries are 2.0° or more, the secondary recrystallized grain which is generally recognized only becomes simply the oblate shape, and thus, the above effects of the present embodiment are not favorably obtained. The embodiment is based on including the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB (the boundary which divides the inside of secondary recrystallized grain). Thus, although it is unlikely that the angles ϕ of all boundaries are 2.0° or more, it is preferable to satisfy the value of RBL/RAL, in addition to satisfying the value of RAC/RAL.


In addition to controlling the value of RBL/RAL in the rolling direction, in the present embodiment, as with the third embodiment, the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC may satisfy 1.10≤RBC÷RAC in the transverse direction. By the feature, the continuity of the crystal orientation increases in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as a whole, which is rather preferable.


Moreover, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, it is preferable to control the grain size of secondary recrystallized grain in the rolling direction and in the transverse direction.


Specifically, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L and a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


it is preferable that the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC satisfy 1.50≤RBC÷RBL. Moreover, it is preferable that RBC÷RBL≤20.


The above feature is not related to the above “switching” and represents the situation such that the secondary recrystallized grain is elongated in the transverse direction. Thus, the above feature in itself is not particular. However, in the present embodiment, in addition to controlling the value of RAC/RAL, it is preferable that the value of RBC/RBL satisfies the above limitation range.


In the present embodiment, when the value of RAC/RAL of the γ subgrain is controlled in relation to the above switching, the shape of the secondary recrystallized grain tends to be further anisotropic in plane. In other words, in a case where the switching regarding the deviation angle γ is made to induce as in the present embodiment, by controlling the shape of the secondary recrystallized grain to be anisotropic in plane, the shape of the γ subgrain tends to be anisotropic in plane.


The value of RBC/RBL is preferably 1.80 or more, is more preferably 2.00 or more, and is further more preferably 2.50 or more. The upper limit of the value of RBC/RBL is not particularly limited.


As a practical method for controlling the value of RBC/RBL, for instance, it is possible to exemplify a process in which the secondary recrystallized grain is grown under conditions such that the heating is conducted preferentially from a widthwise edge of coil during final annealing, and thereby, the thermal gradient is applied in the width direction of coil (axial direction of coil). Under the above conditions, it is possible to control the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain in the width direction of coil (for instance, the transverse direction) to be the same as the coil width, while maintaining the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain in the circumferential direction of coil (for instance, the rolling direction) at approximately 50 mm. For instance, it is possible to occupy the full width of coil having 1000 mm width by one grain. In the case, the upper limit of the value of RBC/RBL, may be 20.


When the secondary recrystallization is made to progress by a continuous annealing process so as to apply the thermal gradient not in the transverse direction but in the rolling direction, it is possible to control the maximum grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain to be larger without being limited by the coil width. Even in the case, since the grain is appropriately divided by the γ subboundary resulted from the switching in the present embodiment, it is possible to obtain the above effects of the present embodiment.


In addition, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, it is preferable that the occurrence frequency of the switching regarding the deviation angle γ is controlled in the rolling direction and in the transverse direction.


Specifically, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, when a grain size RAL, is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L, when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L, when a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C, and when a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


it is preferable that the grain size RAL, the grain size RAC, the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC satisfy (RBC×RAL)÷(RBL×RAC)<1.0. The lower limit thereof is not particularly limited. When considering present technology, the grain size RAL, the grain size RAC, the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC may satisfy 0.2<(RBC×RAL)÷(RBL×RAC).


The above feature represents the anisotropy in plane concerned with the occurrence frequency of the above “switching”. Specifically, the above (RBC×RAL)/(RBL×RAC) is the ratio of “RBC/RAC:the occurrence frequency of the switching which divides the secondary recrystallized grain in the transverse direction” to “RBL/RAL:the occurrence frequency of the switching which divides the secondary recrystallized grain in the rolling direction”. The state such that the above value is less than 1 indicates that one secondary recrystallized grain is divided into many domains in the rolling direction by the switching (the γ subboundary).


Considered from a different way, the above (RBC×RAL)/(RBL×RAC) is the ratio of “RBC/RBL:the oblateness of the secondary recrystallized grain” to “RAC/RAL:the oblateness of the γ subgrain”. The state such that the above value is less than 1 indicates that the γ subgrain dividing one secondary recrystallized grain becomes the oblate shape as compared with the secondary recrystallized grain.


Specifically, the γ subboundary tends to divide the secondary recrystallized grain not in the transverse direction but in the rolling direction. In other words, the γ subboundary tends to elongate in the direction where the secondary recrystallized grain elongates. From the tendency of the γ subboundary, it is considered that the switching makes the area occupied by the crystal with specific orientation increase, when the secondary recrystallized grain elongates.


The value of (RBC×RAL)/(RBL×RAC) is preferably 0.9 or less, is more preferably 0.8 or less, and is further more preferably 0.5 or less. As described above, the lower limit of (RBC×RAL)/(RBL×RAC) is not particularly limited, but the value may be more than 0.2 when considering the industrial feasibility.


The above RBL and RBC are determined based on the boundary satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 2 shown in Table 1, and the above RAL and RAC are determined based on the boundary satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 3 shown in Table 1. For instance, the deviation angles of the crystal orientations are measured on the measurement line including at least 500 measurement points along the transverse direction, and the RAC is determined as the average length of the line segment between the boundaries satisfying the case 1 and/or the case 3 on the measurement line. In the same way, the grain size RAL, the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC may be determined.


(Common Technical Features in Each Embodiment)


Next, common technical features of the grain oriented electrical steel sheets according to the above embodiments are explained below.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L and a grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,


it is preferable that the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC are 22 mm or larger.


It seems that the switching occurs caused by the dislocations piled up during the grain growth of the secondary recrystallized grain. Thus, after the switching occurs once and before next switching occurs, it is needed that the secondary recrystallized grain grows to a certain size. When the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC are smaller than 15 mm, the switching may be difficult to occur, and it may be difficult to sufficiently improve the magnetostriction in high magnetic field by the switching. The grain size RBL and the grain size RBC may be 15 mm or larger. The grain size RBL and the grain size RBC are preferably 22 mm or larger, are more preferably 30 mm or larger, and are further more preferably 40 mm or larger.


The upper limits of the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC are not particularly limited. For example, in the typical production of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, the grain having the {110}<001> orientation is formed by the growth in the secondary recrystallization under the condition with the curvature in the rolling direction where the coiled steel sheet is heated after the primary recrystallization. When the grain size RBL in the rolling direction is excessively large, the deviation angle γ may increase, and the magnetostriction may increase. Thus, it is preferable to avoid increasing the grain size RBL without limitation. The upper limit of the grain size RBL is preferably 400 mm, is more preferably 200 mm, and is further more preferably 100 mm when considering the industrial feasibility.


Moreover, in the typical production of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, since the grain having the {110}<001> orientation is formed due to the growth in the secondary recrystallization by heating the coiled steel sheet after the primary recrystallization, the secondary recrystallized grain can grow from the coil edge where the temperature rises antecedently toward the coil center where the temperature rises subsequently. In the producing method, when the coil width is 1000 mm for instance, the upper limit of the grain size RBC may be 500 mm which is approximately half of the coil width. Of course, in each embodiment, it is not excluded that the grain size RBC is the full width of coil.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L and a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C, it is preferable that the grain size RAL is 30 mm or smaller and the grain size RAC is 400 mm or smaller.


The state such that the grain size RAL is smaller indicates that the occurrence frequency of the switching in the rolling direction is higher. The grain size RAL may be 40 mm or smaller. The grain size RAL is preferably 30 mm or smaller, and is more preferably 20 mm or smaller.


When the grain size RAC is excessively large without sufficient switching, the deviation angle γ may increase, and the magnetostriction may increase. Thus, it is preferable to avoid increasing the grain size RAC without limitation. The upper limit of the grain size RAC is preferably 400 mm, is more preferably 200 mm, is more preferably 100 mm, is more preferably 40 mm, and is further more preferably 30 mm when considering the industrial feasibility.


The lower limits of the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC are not particularly limited. In each embodiment, since the interval for measuring the crystal orientation is 1 mm, the lower limits of the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC may be 1 mm. However, in each embodiment, even when the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC become smaller than 1 mm by controlling the interval for measuring the crystal orientation to less than 1 mm, the above steel sheet is not excluded. Herein, the switching causes residual lattice defects somewhat. When the switching occurs excessively, it is concerned that the magnetic characteristics are negatively affected. The lower limits of the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC are preferably 5 mm when considering the industrial feasibility.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment, the measurement result of the grain size maximally includes an ambiguity of 2 mm for each grain. Thus, when the grain size is measured (when the crystal orientations are measured on at least 500 measurement points with 1 mm intervals on the rolled surface), it is preferable that the above measurements are conducted under conditions such that the measurement areas are totally 5 areas or more and are the areas which are sufficiently distant from each other in the direction orthogonal to the direction for determining the grain size in plane, specifically, the areas where the different grains can be measured. By calculating the average from all grain sizes obtained by the measurements at 5 areas or more in total, it is possible to reduce the above ambiguity. For instance, the measurements may be conducted at 5 areas or more which are sufficiently distant from each other in the rolling direction for measuring the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC and at 5 areas or more which are sufficiently distant from each other in the transverse direction for measuring the grain size RAL and the grain size RBL, and then, the average grain size may be determined from the orientation measurements whose measurement points of 2500 or more in total.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, it is preferable that σ(|γ|) which is a standard deviation of an absolute value of the deviation angle γ is 0° to 3.50°.


When the switching does not occur sufficiently, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field is not improved sufficiently. It seems that the above situation indicates that the improvement of the magnetostriction in high magnetic field results from the deviation angle aligning in the specific direction. In other words, it seems that the improvement of the magnetostriction in high magnetic field is not derived from the orientation selectivity originated in the encroachment in the initial stage including the nucleation of secondary recrystallization or in the growing stage of secondary recrystallization. Specifically, in order to obtain the effects of the present embodiments, in particular, it is not an essential requirement to control the crystal orientation to align in the specific direction as with the conventional orientation control, for instance, to control the absolute value and standard deviation of the deviation angle to be small. However, in the steel sheet in which the switching explained above occurs sufficiently, the “deviation angle” tends to be controlled to a characteristic range. For instance, in a case where the crystal orientation is gradually changed by the switching regarding the deviation angle γ, it is not an obstacle for the present embodiments that the absolute value of the deviation angle decreases close to zero. Moreover, for instance, in a case where the crystal orientation is gradually changed by the switching regarding the deviation angle γ, it is not an obstacle for the present embodiments that the crystal orientation in itself converges with the specific orientation, and as a result, that the standard deviation of the deviation angle decreases close to zero.


Thus, in the present embodiments, σ(|γ|) which is the standard deviation of the absolute value of the deviation angle γ may be 0° to 3.50°.


The σ(|γ|) which is the standard deviation of the absolute value of the deviation angle γ may be obtained as follows.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, the alignment degree to the {110}<001> orientation is increased by the secondary recrystallization in which the grains grown to approximately several centimeters are formed. In each embodiment, it is necessary to recognize the fluctuations of the crystal orientation in the above grain oriented electrical steel sheet. Thus, in an area where at least 20 grains or more of the secondary recrystallized grains are included, the crystal orientations are measured on at least 500 measurement points.


In each embodiment, it should not be considered that “one secondary recrystallized grain is regarded as a single crystal, and the secondary recrystallized grain has a strictly uniform crystal orientation”. In other words, in each embodiment, the local orientation changes which are not conventionally recognized as boundary are included in one coarse secondary recrystallized grain, and it is necessary to detect the local orientation changes.


Thus, for instance, it is preferable that the measurement points of the crystal orientation are distributed at even intervals in a predetermined area which is arranged so as to be independent of the boundaries of grain (the grain boundaries). Specifically, it is preferable that the measurement points are distributed at even intervals that is vertically and horizontally 5 mm intervals in the area of L mm×M mm (however, L, M>100) where at least 20 grains or more are included on the steel surface, the crystal orientations are measured at each measurement point, and thereby, the data from 500 points or more are obtained. When the measurement point corresponds to the grain boundary or some defect, the data therefrom are not utilized. Moreover, it is needed to widen the above measurement area depending on an area required to determine the magnetic characteristics of the evaluated steel sheet (for instance, in regards to an actual coil, an area for measuring the magnetic characteristics which need to be described in the steel inspection certificate).


Thereafter, the deviation angle γ is determined in each measurement point, and the σ(|γ|) which is the standard deviation of the absolute value of the deviation angle γ is calculated. In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment, it is preferable that the γ(|γ|) satisfies the above limitation range.


Herein, in general, it is considered that the deviation angle β is a factor which needs to be decreased in order to improve the magnetic characteristics or the magnetostriction in middle magnetic field where excited so as to be approximately 1.7 T. However, when controlling only deviation angle β, the obtained characteristics are limited. In the embodiments, by controlling the deviation angle γ, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field where excited so as to be approximately 1.9 T is improved. In addition, in each embodiment as described above, by controlling the σ(|γ|) in addition to the above technical features, the continuity of the crystal orientation is more favorably influenced in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as a whole.


The σ(|γ|) which is the standard deviation of the absolute value of the deviation angle γ is preferably 3.00 or less, is more preferably 2.50 or less, and is further more preferably 2.00 or less. Of course, the σ(|γ|) may be zero.


The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the above embodiments may have an intermediate layer and an insulation coating on the steel sheet. The crystal orientation, the boundary, the average grain size, and the like may be determined based on the steel sheet without the coating and the like. In other words, in a case where the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as the measurement specimen has the coating and the like on the surface thereon, the crystal orientation and the like may be measured after removing the coating and the like.


For instance, in order to remove the insulation coating, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet with the coating may be immersed in hot alkaline solution. Specifically, it is possible to remove the insulating coating from the grain oriented electrical steel sheet by immersing the steel sheet in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution which includes 30 to 50 mass % of NaOH and 50 to 70 mass % of H2O at 80 to 90° C. for 5 to 10 minutes, washing it with water, and then, drying it. Moreover, the immersing time in sodium hydroxide aqueous solution may be adjusted depending on the thickness of insulating coating.


Moreover, for instance, in order to remove the intermediate layer, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet in which the insulation coating is removed may be immersed in hot hydrochloric acid. Specifically, it is possible to remove the intermediate layer by previously investigating the preferred concentration of hydrochloric acid for removing the intermediate layer to be dissolved, immersing the steel sheet in the hydrochloric acid with the above concentration such as 30 to 40 mass % of HCl at 80 to 90° C. for 1 to 5 minutes, washing it with water, and then, drying it. In general, layer and coating are removed by selectively using the solution, for instance, the alkaline solution is used for removing the insulation coating, and the hydrochloric acid is used for removing the intermediate layer.


Next, the chemical composition of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment is explained. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment includes, as the chemical composition, base elements, optional elements as necessary, and a balance consisting of Fe and impurities.


The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment includes 2.00 to 7.00% of Si (silicon) in mass percentage as the base elements (main alloying elements).


The Si content is preferably 2.0 to 7.0% in order to control the crystal orientation to align in the {110}<001> orientation.


In each embodiment, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet may include the impurities as the chemical composition. The impurities correspond to elements which are contaminated during industrial production of steel from ores and scrap that are used as a raw material of steel, or from environment of a production process. For instance, an upper limit of the impurities may be 5% in total.


Moreover, in each embodiment, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet may include the optional elements in addition to the base elements and the impurities. For instance, as substitution for a part of Fe which is the balance, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet may include the optional elements such as Nb, V, Mo, Ta, W, C, Mn, S, Se, Al, N, Cu, Bi, B, P, Ti, Sn, Sb, Cr, or Ni. The optional elements may be included as necessary. Thus, a lower limit of the respective optional elements does not need to be limited, and the lower limit may be 0%. Moreover, even if the optional elements may be included as impurities, the above mentioned effects are not affected.


0 to 0.030% of Nb (niobium)


0 to 0.030% of V (vanadium)


0 to 0.030% of Mo (molybdenum)


0 to 0.030% of Ta (tantalum)


0 to 0.030% of W (tungsten)


Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W can be utilized as an element having the effects characteristically in each embodiment. In the following description, at least one element selected from the group consisting of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W may be referred to as “Nb group element” as a whole.


The Nb group element favorably influences the occurrence of the switching which is characteristic in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment. Herein, it is in the production process that the Nb group element influences the occurrence of the switching. Thus, the Nb group element does not need to be included in the final product which is the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment. For instance, the Nb group element may tend to be released outside the system by the purification during the final annealing described later. In other words, even when the Nb group element is included in the slab and makes the occurrence frequency of the switching increase in the production process, the Nb group element may be released outside the system by the purification annealing. As mentioned above, the Nb group element may not be detected as the chemical composition of the final product.


Thus, in each embodiment, with respect to an amount of the Nb group element as the chemical composition of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet which is the final product, only upper limit thereof is regulated. The upper limit of the Nb group element may be 0.030% respectively. On the other hand, as mentioned above, even when the Nb group element is utilized in the production process, the amount of the Nb group element may be zero as the final product. Thus, a lower limit of the Nb group element is not particularly limited. The lower limit of the Nb group element may be zero respectively.


In each embodiment of the present invention, it is preferable that the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one selected from a group consisting of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W and that the amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.


It is unlikely that the amount of the Nb group element increases during the production. Thus, when the Nb group element is detected as the chemical composition of the final product, the above situation implies that the switching is controlled by the Nb group element in the production process. In order to favorably control the switching in the production process, the total amount of the Nb group element in the final product is preferably 0.0030% or more, and is more preferably 0.0050% or more. On the other hand, when the total amount of the Nb group element in the final product is more than 0.030%, the occurrence frequency of the switching is maintained, but the magnetic characteristics may deteriorate. Thus, the total amount of the Nb group element in the final product is preferably 0.030% or less. The features of the Nb group element are explained later in connection with the producing method.


0 to 0.0050% of C (carbon)


0 to 1.0% of Mn (manganese)


0 to 0.0150% of S (sulfur)


0 to 0.0150% of Se (selenium)


0 to 0.0650% of Al (acid-soluble aluminum)


0 to 0.0050% of N (nitrogen)


0 to 0.40% of Cu (copper)


0 to 0.010% of Bi (bismuth)


0 to 0.080% of B (boron)


0 to 0.50% of P (phosphorus)


0 to 0.0150% of Ti (titanium)


0 to 0.10% of Sn (tin)


0 to 0.10% of Sb (antimony)


0 to 0.30% of Cr (chrome)


0 to 1.0% of Ni (nickel)


The optional elements may be included as necessary. Thus, a lower limit of the respective optional elements does not need to be limited, and the lower limit may be 0%. The total amount of S and Se is preferably 0 to 0.0150%. The total of S and Se indicates that at least one of S and Se is included, and the amount thereof corresponds to the above total amount.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet, the chemical composition changes relatively drastically (the amount of alloying element decreases) through the decarburization annealing and through the purification annealing during secondary recrystallization. Depending on the element, the amount of the element may decreases through the purification annealing to an undetectable level (1 ppm or less) using the typical analysis method. The above mentioned chemical composition of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment is the chemical composition as the final product. In general, the chemical composition of the final product is different from the chemical composition of the slab as the starting material.


The chemical composition of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment may be measured by typical analytical methods for the steel. For instance, the chemical composition of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet may be measured by using ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer: inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy spectrometry). Specifically, it is possible to obtain the chemical composition by conducting the measurement by Shimadzu ICPS-8100 and the like (measurement device) under the condition based on calibration curve prepared in advance using samples with 35 mm square taken from the grain oriented electrical steel sheet. In addition, C and S may be measured by the infrared absorption method after combustion, and N may be measured by the thermal conductometric method after fusion in a current of inert gas.


The above chemical composition is the composition of grain oriented electrical steel sheet. When the grain oriented electrical steel sheet used as the measurement sample has the insulating coating and the like on the surface thereof, the chemical composition is measured after removing the coating and the like by the above methods.


The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment has the feature such that the secondary recrystallized grain is divided into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different, and by the feature, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range is reduced. Thus, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment, a layering structure on the steel sheet, a treatment for refining the magnetic domain, and the like are not particularly limited. In each embodiment, an optional coating may be formed on the steel sheet according to the purpose, and a magnetic domain refining treatment may be applied according to the necessity.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, the intermediate layer may be arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet and the insulation coating may be arranged in contact with the intermediate layer.



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional illustration of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, when viewing the cross section whose cutting direction is parallel to thickness direction, the grain oriented electrical steel sheet 10 (silicon steel sheet) according to the present embodiment may have the intermediate layer 20 which is arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet 10 (silicon steel sheet) and the insulation coating 30 which is arranged in contact with the intermediate layer 20.


For instance, the above intermediate layer may be a layer mainly including oxides, a layer mainly including carbides, a layer mainly including nitrides, a layer mainly including borides, a layer mainly including silicides, a layer mainly including phosphides, a layer mainly including sulfides, a layer mainly including intermetallic compounds, and the like. There intermediate layers may be formed by a heat treatment in an atmosphere where the redox properties are controlled, a chemical vapor deposition (CVD), a physical vapor deposition (PVD), and the like.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, the intermediate layer may be a forsterite film with an average thickness of 1 to 3 μm. Herein, the forsterite film corresponds to a layer mainly including Mg2SiO4. An interface between the forsterite film and the grain oriented electrical steel sheet becomes the interface such that the forsterite film intrudes the steel sheet when viewing the above cross section.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, the intermediate layer may be an oxide layer with an average thickness of 2 to 500 nm. Herein, the oxide layer corresponds to a layer mainly including SiO2. An interface between the oxide layer and the grain oriented electrical steel sheet becomes the smooth interface when viewing the above cross section.


In addition, the above insulation coating may be an insulation coating which mainly includes phosphate and colloidal silica and whose average thickness is 0.1 to 10 μm, an insulation coating which mainly includes alumina sol and boric acid and whose average thickness is 0.5 to 8 μm, and the like.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to each embodiment of the present invention, the magnetic domain may be refined by at least one of applying a local minute strain and forming a local groove. The local minute strain or the local groove may be applied or formed by laser, plasma, mechanical methods, etching, or other methods. For instance, the local minute strain or the local groove may be applied or formed lineally or punctiformly so as to extend in the direction intersecting the rolling direction on the rolled surface of steel sheet and so as to have the interval of 4 to 10 mm in the rolling direction.


(Method for Producing the Grain Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet)


Next, a method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention is described.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, the method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet) according to the present embodiment includes a casting process, a hot rolling process, a hot band annealing process, a cold rolling process, a decarburization annealing process, an annealing separator applying process, and a final annealing process. In addition, as necessary, a nitridation may be conducted at appropriate timing from the decarburization annealing process to the final annealing process, and an insulation coating forming process may be conducted after the final annealing process.


Specifically, the method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet) may be as follows.


In the casting process, a slab is cast so that the slab includes, as the chemical composition, by mass %, 2.0 to 7.0% of Si, 0 to 0.030% of Nb, 0 to 0.030% of V, 0 to 0.030% of Mo, 0 to 0.030% of Ta, 0 to 0.030% of W, 0 to 0.0850% of C, 0 to 1.0% of Mn, 0 to 0.0350% of S, 0 to 0.0350% of Se, 0 to 0.0650% of Al, 0 to 0.0120% of N, 0 to 0.40% of Cu, 0 to 0.010% of Bi, 0 to 0.080% of B, 0 to 0.50% of P, 0 to 0.0150% of Ti, 0 to 0.10% of Sn, 0 to 0.10% of Sb, 0 to 0.30% of Cr, 0 to 1.0% of Ni, and a balance consisting of Fe and impurities.


In the decarburization annealing process, a grain size of primary recrystallized grain is controlled to 24 μm or smaller.


In the final annealing process,


when a total amount of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W in the chemical composition of the slab is 0.0030 to 0.030%, in a heating stage, at least one of PH2O/PH2 in 700 to 800° C. to be 0.10 to 1.0 or PH2O/PH2 in 1000 to 1050° C. to be 0.0020 to 0.030 is satisfied, and holding time in 850 to 950° C. is controlled to be 120 to 600 minutes, or


when a total amount of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W in the chemical composition of the slab is not 0.0030 to 0.030%, in a heating stage, PH2O/PH2 in 700 to 800° C. is controlled to be 0.10 to 1.0, PH2O/PH2 in 1000 to 1050° C. is controlled to be 0.0020 to 0.030, and holding time in 850 to 950° C. is controlled to be 120 to 600 minutes.


The above PH2O/PH2 is called oxidation degree, and is a ratio of vapor partial pressure PH2O to hydrogen partial pressure PH2 in atmosphere gas.


The “switching” according to the present embodiment is controlled mainly by a factor to easily induce the orientation changes (switching) itself and a factor to periodically induce the orientation changes (switching) within one secondary recrystallized grain.


In order to easily induce the switching itself, it is effective to make the secondary recrystallization start from lower temperature. For instance, by controlling the grain size of the primary recrystallized grain or by utilizing the Nb group element, it is possible to control starting the secondary recrystallization to be lower temperature.


In order to periodically induce the switching within one secondary recrystallized grain, it is effective to make the secondary recrystallized grain grow continuously from lower temperature to higher temperature. For instance, by utilizing AlN and the like which are the conventional inhibitor at appropriate temperature and in appropriate atmosphere, it is possible to make the secondary recrystallized grain nucleate at lower temperature, to make the inhibitor ability maintain continuously up to higher temperature, and to periodically induce the switching up to higher temperature within one secondary recrystallized grain.


In other words, in order to favorably induce the switching, it is effective to suppress the nucleation of the secondary recrystallized grain at higher temperature and to make the secondary recrystallized grain nucleated at lower temperature preferentially grow up to higher temperature.


In addition to the above two factors according to the present embodiment, in order to control the shape of the γ subgrain to be anisotropic in plane, it is possible to employ a process for making the secondary recrystallized grain grow anisotropically as the secondary recrystallization process which is a downstream process.


In order to control the switching which is the feature of the present embodiment, the above factors are important. In regards to the production conditions except the above, it is possible to apply a conventional known method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet. For instance, the conventional known method may be a producing method utilizing MnS and AlN as inhibitor which are formed by high temperature slab heating, a producing method utilizing AlN as inhibitor which is formed by low temperature slab heating and subsequent nitridation, and the like. For the switching which is the feature of the present embodiment, any producing method may be applied. The embodiment is not limited to a specific producing method. Hereinafter, the method for controlling the switching by the producing method applied the nitridation is explained for instance.


(Casting Process)


In the casting process, a slab is made. For instance, a method for making the slab is as follow. A molten steel is made (a steel is melted). The slab is made by using the molten steel. The slab may be made by continuous casting. An ingot may be made by using the molten steel, and then, the slab may be made by blooming the ingot. A thickness of the slab is not particularly limited. The thickness of the slab may be 150 to 350 mm for instance. The thickness of the slab is preferably 220 to 280 mm. The slab with the thickness of 10 to 70 mm which is a so-called thin slab may be used. When using the thin slab, it is possible to omit a rough rolling before final rolling in the hot rolling process.


As the chemical composition of the slab, it is possible to employ a chemical composition of a slab used for producing a general grain oriented electrical steel sheet. For instance, the chemical composition of the slab may include the following elements.


0 to 0.0850% of C


Carbon (C) is an element effective in controlling the primary recrystallized structure in the production process. However, when the C content in the final product is excessive, the magnetic characteristics are negatively affected. Thus, the C content in the slab may be 0 to 0.0850%. The upper limit of the C content is preferably 0.0750%. C is decarburized and purified in the decarburization annealing process and the final annealing process as mentioned below, and then, the C content becomes 0.0050% or less after the final annealing process. When C is included, the lower limit of the C content may be more than 0%, and may be 0.0010% from the productivity standpoint in the industrial production.


2.0 to 7.0% of Si


Silicon (Si) is an element which increases the electric resistance of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet and thereby decreases the iron loss. When the Si content is less than 2.0%, an austenite transformation occurs during the final annealing and the crystal orientation of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet is impaired. On the other hand, when the Si content is more than 7.0%, the cold workability deteriorates and the cracks tend to occur during cold rolling. The lower limit of the Si content is preferably 2.50%, and is more preferably 3.0%. The upper limit of the Si content is preferably 4.50%, and is more preferably 4.0%.


0 to 1.0% of Mn


Manganese (Mn) forms MnS and/or MnSe by bonding to S and/or Se, which act as the inhibitor. The Mn content may be 0 to 1.0%. When Mn is included and the Mn content is 0.05 to 1.0%, the secondary recrystallization becomes stable, which is preferable. In the present embodiment, the nitride of the Nb group element can bear a part of the function of the inhibitor. In the case, the inhibitor intensity as MnS and/or MnSe in general is controlled weakly. Thus, the upper limit of the Mn content is preferably 0.50%, and is more preferably 0.20%.


0 to 0.0350% of S


0 to 0.0350% of Se


Sulfur (S) and Selenium (Se) form MnS and/or MnSe by bonding to Mn, which act as the inhibitor. The S content may be 0 to 0.0350%, and the Se content may be 0 to 0.0350%. When at least one of S and Se is included, and when the total amount of S and Se is 0.0030 to 0.0350%, the secondary recrystallization becomes stable, which is preferable. In the present embodiment, the nitride of the Nb group element can bear a part of the function of the inhibitor. In the case, the inhibitor intensity as MnS and/or MnSe in general is controlled weakly. Thus, the upper limit of the total amount of S and Se is preferably 0.0250%, and is more preferably 0.010%. When S and/or Se remain in the steel after the final annealing, the compound is formed, and thereby, the iron loss is deteriorated. Thus, it is preferable to reduce S and Se as much as possible by the purification during the final annealing.


Herein, “the total amount of S and Se is 0.0030 to 0.0350%” indicates that only one of S or Se is included as the chemical composition in the slab and the amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.0350% or that both of S and Se are included in the slab and the total amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.0350%.


0 to 0.0650% of Al


Aluminum (Al) forms (Al, Si)N by bonding to N, which acts as the inhibitor. The Al content may be 0 to 0.0650%. When Al is included and the Al content is 0.010 to 0.065%, the inhibitor AlN formed by the nitridation mentioned below expands the temperature range of the secondary recrystallization, and the secondary recrystallization becomes stable especially in higher temperature range, which is preferable. The lower limit of the Al content is preferably 0.020%, and is more preferably 0.0250%. The upper limit of the Al content is preferably 0.040%, and is more preferably 0.030% from the stability standpoint in the secondary recrystallization.


0 to 0.0120% of N


Nitrogen (N) bonds to Al and acts as the inhibitor. The N content may be 0 to 0.0120%. The lower limit thereof may be 0% because it is possible to include N by the nitridation in midstream of the production process. When N is included and the N content is more than 0.0120%, the blister which is a kind of defect tends to be formed in the steel sheet. The upper limit of the N content is preferably 0.010%, and is more preferably 0.0090%. N is purified in the final annealing process, and then, the N content becomes 0.0050% or less after the final annealing process.


0 to 0.030% of Nb


0 to 0.030% of V


0 to 0.030% of Mo


0 to 0.030% of Ta


0 to 0.030% of W


Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W are the Nb group element. The Nb content may be 0 to 0.030%, the V content may be 0 to 0.030%, the Mo content may be 0 to 0.030%, the Ta content may be 0 to 0.030%, and the W content may be 0 to 0.030%.


Moreover, it is preferable that the slab includes, as the Nb group element, at least one selected from a group consisting of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W and that the amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.


When utilizing the Nb group element for controlling the switching, and when the total amount of the Nb group element in the slab is 0.030% or less (preferably 0.0030% or more and 0.030% or less), the secondary recrystallization starts at appropriate timing. Moreover, the orientation of the formed secondary recrystallized grain becomes very favorable, the switching which is the feature of the present embodiment tends to be occur in the subsequent growing stage, and the microstructure is finally controlled to be favorable for the magnetization characteristics.


By including the Nb group element, the grain size of the primary recrystallized grain after the decarburization annealing becomes fine as compared with not including the Nb group element. It seems that the refinement of the primary recrystallized grain is resulted from the pinning effect of the precipitates such as carbides, carbonitrides, and nitrides, the drug effect of the solid-saluted elements, and the like. In particular, the above effect is more preferably obtained by including Nb and Ta.


By the refinement of the grain size of the primary recrystallized grain due to the Nb group element, the driving force of the secondary recrystallization increases, and then, the secondary recrystallization starts from lower temperature as compared with the conventional techniques. In addition, since the precipitates derived from the Nb group element solutes at relatively lower temperature as compared with the conventional inhibitors such as AlN, the secondary recrystallization starts from lower temperature in the heating stage of the final annealing as compared with the conventional techniques. The secondary recrystallization starts from lower temperature, and thereby, the switching which is the feature of the present embodiment tends to be occur. The mechanism thereof is described below.


In a case where the precipitates derived from the Nb group element are utilized as the inhibitor for the secondary recrystallization, since the carbides and carbonitrides of the Nb group element become unstable in the temperature range lower than the temperature range where the secondary recrystallization can occur, it seems that the effect of controlling the starting temperature of the secondary recrystallization to be lower temperature is small. Thus, in order to favorably control the starting temperature of the secondary recrystallization to be lower temperature, it is preferable that the nitrides of the Nb group element which are stable up to the temperature range where the secondary recrystallization can occur are utilized.


By concurrently utilizing the precipitates (preferably nitrides) derived from the Nb group element controlling the starting temperature of the secondary recrystallization to be lower temperature and the conventional inhibitors such as AlN, (Al, Si)N, and the like which are stable up to higher temperature even after starting the secondary recrystallization, it is possible to expand the temperature range where the grain having the {110}<001> orientation which is the secondary recrystallized grain is preferentially grown. Thus, the switching is induced in the wide temperature range from lower temperature to higher temperature, and thus, the orientation selectivity functions in the wide temperature range. As a results, it is possible to increase the existence frequency of the γ subboundary in the final product, and thus, to effectively increase the alignment degree to the {110}<001> orientation of the secondary recrystallized grains included in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet.


Herein, in a case where the primary recrystallized grain is intended to be refined by the pinning effect of the carbides, the carbonitrides, and the like of the Nb group element, it is preferable to control the C content of the slab to be 50 ppm or more at casting. However, since the nitrides are preferred as the inhibitor for the secondary recrystallization as compared with the carbides and the carbonitrides, it is preferable that the carbides and the carbonitrides of the Nb group element are sufficiently soluted in the steel after finishing the primary recrystallization by reducing the C content to 30 ppm or less, preferably 20 ppm or less, and more preferably 10 ppm or less through the decarburization annealing. In a case where most of the Nb group element is solid-soluted by the decarburization annealing, it is possible to control the nitrides (the inhibitor) of the Nb group element to be the morphology favorable for the present embodiment (the morphology facilitating the secondary recrystallization) in the subsequent nitridation.


The total amount of the Nb group element is preferably 0.0040% or more, and more preferably 0.0050% or more. The total amount of the Nb group element is preferably 0.020% or less, and more preferably 0.010% or less.


In the chemical composition of the slab, a balance consists of Fe and impurities. The above impurities correspond to elements which are contaminated from the raw materials or from the production environment, when industrially producing the slab. Moreover, the above impurities indicate elements which do not substantially affect the effects of the present embodiment.


In addition to solving production problems, in consideration of the influence on the magnetic characteristics and the improvement of the inhibitors function by forming compounds, the slab may include the known optional elements as substitution for a part of Fe. For instance, the optional elements may be the following elements.


0 to 0.40% of Cu


0 to 0.010% of Bi


0 to 0.080% of B


0 to 0.50% of P


0 to 0.0150% of Ti


0 to 0.10% of Sn


0 to 0.10% of Sb


0 to 0.30% of Cr


0 to 1.0% of Ni


The optional elements may be included as necessary. Thus, a lower limit of the respective optional elements does not need to be limited, and the lower limit may be 0%.


(Hot Rolling Process)


In the hot rolling process, the slab is heated to a predetermined temperature (for instance, 1100 to 1400° C.), and then, is subjected to hot rolling in order to obtain a hot rolled steel sheet. In the hot rolling process, for instance, the silicon steel material (slab) after the casting process is heated, is rough-rolled, and then, is final-rolled in order to obtain the hot rolled steel sheet with a predetermined thickness, e.g. 1.8 to 3.5 mm. After finishing the final rolling, the hot rolled steel sheet is coiled at a predetermined temperature.


Since the inhibitor intensity as MnS is not necessarily needed, it is preferable that the slab heating temperature is 1100 to 1280° C. from the productivity standpoint.


Herein, in the hot rolling process, by applying the thermal gradient within the above range along the width direction or the longitudinal direction of steel strip, it is possible to make the crystal structure, the crystal orientation, or the precipitates have the non-uniformity depending on the position in plane of the steel sheet. Thereby, it is possible to make the secondary recrystallized grain grow anisotropically in the secondary recrystallization process which is the downstream process, and possible to favorably control the shape of the γ subgrain important for the present embodiment to be anisotropic in plane. For instance, by applying the thermal gradient along the transverse direction during the slab heating, it is possible to refine the precipitates in the higher temperature area, possible to enhance the inhibitor ability in the higher temperature area, and thereby, possible to induce the preferential grain growth from the lower temperature area toward the higher temperature area during the secondary recrystallization.


(Hot Band Annealing Process)


In the hot band annealing process, the hot rolled steel sheet after the hot rolling process is annealed under predetermined conditions (for instance, 750 to 1200° C. for 30 seconds to 10 minutes) in order to obtain a hot band annealed sheet.


Herein, in the hot band annealing process, by applying the thermal gradient within the above range along the width direction or the longitudinal direction of steel strip, it is possible to make the crystal structure, the crystal orientation, or the precipitates have the non-uniformity depending on the position in plane of the steel sheet. Thereby, it is possible to make the secondary recrystallized grain grow anisotropically in the secondary recrystallization process which is the downstream process, and possible to favorably control the shape of the γ subgrain important for the present embodiment to be anisotropic in plane. For instance, by applying the thermal gradient along the transverse direction during the hot band annealing, it is possible to refine the precipitates in the higher temperature area, possible to enhance the inhibitor ability in the higher temperature area, and thereby, possible to induce the preferential grain growth from the lower temperature area toward the higher temperature area during the secondary recrystallization.


(Cold Rolling Process)


In the cold rolling process, the hot band annealed sheet after the hot band annealing process is cold-rolled once or is cold-rolled plural times (two times or more) with an annealing (intermediate annealing) (for instance, 80 to 95% of total cold reduction) in order to obtain a cold rolled steel sheet with a thickness, e.g. 0.10 to 0.50 mm.


(Decarburization Annealing Process)


In the decarburization annealing process, the cold rolled steel sheet after the cold rolling process is subjected to the decarburization annealing (for instance, 700 to 900° C. for 1 to 3 minutes) in order to obtain a decarburization annealed steel sheet which is primary-recrystallized. By conducting the decarburization annealing for the cold rolled steel sheet, C included in the cold rolled steel sheet is removed. In order to remove “C” included in the cold rolled steel sheet, it is preferable that the decarburization annealing is conducted in moist atmosphere.


In the method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, it is preferable to control a grain size of primary recrystallized grain of the decarburization annealed steel sheet to 24 μm or smaller. By refining the grain size of primary recrystallized grain, it is possible to favorably control the starting temperature of the secondary recrystallization to be lower temperature.


For instance, by controlling the conditions in the hot rolling or the hot band annealing, or by controlling the temperature for decarburization annealing to be lower temperature as necessary, it is possible to decrease the grain size of primary recrystallized grain. In addition, by the pinning effect of the carbides, the carbonitrides, and the like of the Nb group element which is included in the slab, it is possible to decrease the grain size of primary recrystallized grain.


Herein, since the amount of oxidation caused by the decarburization annealing and the state of surface oxidized layer affect the formation of the intermediate layer (glass film), the conditions may be appropriately adjusted using the conventional technique in order to obtain the effects of the present embodiment.


Although the Nb group element may be included as the elements which facilitate the switching, the Nb group element is included at present process in the state such as the carbides, the carbonitrides, the solid-soluted elements, and the like, and influences the refinement of the grain size of primary recrystallized grain. The grain size of primary recrystallized grain is preferably 23 μm or smaller, more preferably 20 μm or smaller, and further more preferably 18 μm or smaller. The grain size of primary recrystallized grain may be 8 μm or larger, and may be 12 μm or larger.


Herein, in the decarburization annealing process, by applying the thermal gradient within the above range or by applying the difference in the decarburization behavior along the width direction or the longitudinal direction of steel strip, it is possible to make the crystal structure, the crystal orientation, or the precipitates have the non-uniformity depending on the position in plane of the steel sheet. Thereby, it is possible to make the secondary recrystallized grain grow anisotropically in the secondary recrystallization process which is the downstream process, and possible to favorably control the shape of the γ subgrain important for the present embodiment to be anisotropic in plane. For instance, by applying the thermal gradient along the transverse direction during the slab heating, it is possible to refine the grain size of primary recrystallized grain in the lower temperature area, possible to increase the driving force of the secondary recrystallization, possible to antecedently start the secondary recrystallization in the lower temperature area, and thereby, possible to induce the preferential grain growth from the lower temperature area toward the higher temperature area during the secondary recrystallization.


(Nitridation)


The nitridation is conducted in order to control the inhibitor intensity for the secondary recrystallization. In the nitridation, the nitrogen content of the steel sheet may be made increase to 40 to 300 ppm at appropriate timing from starting the decarburization annealing to starting the secondary recrystallization in the final annealing. For instance, the nitridation may be a treatment of annealing the steel sheet in an atmosphere containing a gas having a nitriding ability such as ammonia, a treatment of final-annealing the decarburization annealed steel sheet being applied an annealing separator containing a powder having a nitriding ability such as MnN, and the like.


When the slab includes the Nb group element within the above range, the nitrides of the Nb group element formed by the nitridation act as an inhibitor whose ability inhibiting the grain growth disappears at relatively lower temperature, and thus, the secondary recrystallization starts from lower temperature as compared with the conventional techniques. It seems that the nitrides are effective in selecting the nucleation of the secondary recrystallized grain, and thereby, achieve high magnetic flux density. In addition, AlN is formed by the nitridation, and the AlN acts as an inhibitor whose ability inhibiting the grain growth maintains up to relatively higher temperature. In order to obtain these effects, the nitrogen content after the nitridation is preferably 130 to 250 ppm, and is more preferably 150 to 200 ppm.


Herein, in the nitridation, by applying the difference in the nitrogen content within the above range along the width direction or the longitudinal direction of steel strip, it is possible to make the inhibitor intensity have the non-uniformity depending on the position in plane of the steel sheet. Thereby, it is possible to make the secondary recrystallized grain grow anisotropically in the secondary recrystallization process which is the downstream process, and possible to favorably control the shape of the γ subgrain important for the present embodiment to be anisotropic in plane. For instance, by applying the difference in the nitrogen content along the transverse direction, it is possible to enhance the inhibitor ability in highly nitrided area, and thereby, possible to induce the preferential grain growth from lowly nitrided area toward highly nitrided area during the secondary recrystallization.


(Annealing Separator Applying Process)


In the annealing separator applying process, the decarburization annealed steel sheet is applied an annealing separator to. For instance, as the annealing separator, it is possible to use an annealing separator mainly including MgO, an annealing separator mainly including alumina, and the like.


Herein, when the annealing separator mainly including MgO is used, the forsterite film (the layer mainly including Mg2SiO4) tends to be formed as the intermediate layer during the final annealing. When the annealing separator mainly including alumina is used, the oxide layer (the layer mainly including SiO2) tends to be formed as the intermediate layer during the final annealing. These intermediate layers may be removed according to the necessity.


The decarburization annealed steel sheet after applying the annealing separator is coiled and is final-annealed in the subsequent final annealing process.


(Final Annealing Process)


In the final annealing process, the decarburization annealed steel sheet after applying the annealing separator is final-annealed so that the secondary recrystallization occurs. In the process, the secondary recrystallization proceeds under conditions such that the grain growth of the primary recrystallized grain is suppressed by the inhibitor. Thereby, the grain having the {110}<001> orientation is preferentially grown, and the magnetic flux density is drastically improved.


The final annealing is important for controlling the switching which is the feature of the present embodiment. In the present embodiment, the deviation angle γ is controlled based on the following three conditions (A), (B), and (D) in the final annealing.


Herein, in the explanation of the final annealing process, “the total amount of the Nb group element” represents the total amount of the Nb group element included in the steel sheet just before the final annealing (the decarburization annealed steel sheet). Specifically, the chemical composition of the steel sheet just before the final annealing influences the conditions of the final annealing, and the chemical composition after the final annealing or after the purification annealing (for instance, the chemical composition of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (final annealed sheet)) is unrelated.


(A) In the heating stage of the final annealing, when PA is defined as PH2O/PH2 regarding the atmosphere in the temperature range of 700 to 800° C.,


PA: 0.10 to 1.0.


(B) In the heating stage of the final annealing, when PB is defined as PH2O/PH2 regarding the atmosphere in the temperature range of 1000 to 1050° C.,


PB: 0.0020 to 0.030.


(D) In the heating stage of the final annealing, when TD is defined as a holding time in the temperature range of 850 to 950° C.,


TD: 120 to 600 minutes.


Herein, when the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%, at least one of the conditions (A) and (B) may be satisfied, and the conditions (D) may be satisfied.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is not 0.0030 to 0.030%, the three conditions (A), (B), and (D) may be satisfied.


In regard to the conditions (A) and (B), when the Nb group element within the above range is included, due to the effect of suppressing the recovery and the recrystallization which is derived from the Nb group element, the two factors of “starting the secondary recrystallization from lower temperature” and “maintaining the secondary recrystallization up to higher temperature” are potent enough. As a result, the controlling conditions for obtaining the effects of the present embodiment are relaxed.


The PA is preferably 0.30 or more, and is preferably 0.60 or less.


The PB is preferably 0.0050 or more, and is preferably 0.020 or less.


The TD is preferably 180 minutes or longer, and is more preferably 240 or longer. The TD is preferably 480 minutes or shorter, and is more preferably 360 or shorter.


The details of occurrence mechanism of the switching are not clear at present. However, as a result of observing the secondary recrystallization behavior and of considering the production conditions for favorably controlling the switching, it seems that the two factors of “starting the secondary recrystallization from lower temperature” and “maintaining the secondary recrystallization up to higher temperature” are important.


Limitation reasons of the above (A), (B), and (D) are explained based on the above two factors. In the following description, the mechanism includes a presumption.


The condition (A) is the condition for the temperature range which is sufficiently lower that the temperature where the secondary recrystallization occurs. The condition (A) does not directly influence the phenomena recognized as the secondary recrystallization. However, the above temperature range corresponds to the temperature where the surface of the steel sheet is oxidized by the water which is brought in from the annealing separator applied to the surface of the steel sheet. In other words, the above temperature range influences the formation of the primary layer (intermediate layer). The condition (A) is important for controlling the formation of the primary layer, and thereby, enabling the subsequent “maintaining the secondary recrystallization up to higher temperature”. By controlling the atmosphere in the above temperature range to be the above condition, the primary layer becomes dense, and thus, acts as the barrier to prevent the constituent elements (for instance, Al, N, and the like) of the inhibitor from being released outside the system in the stage where the secondary recrystallization occurs. Thereby, it is possible to maintain the secondary recrystallization up to higher temperature, and possible to sufficiently induce the switching.


The condition (B) is the condition for the temperature range which corresponds to the middle stage of the grain growth in the secondary recrystallization. The condition (B) influences the control of the inhibitor intensity in the stage where the secondary recrystallized grain grows. By controlling the atmosphere in the above temperature range to be the above condition, the secondary recrystallized grain grows with being rate-limited by the dissolution of the inhibitor in the final stage of the grain growth. Although the details are described later, by the condition (B), dislocations are efficiently piled up in front of the grain boundary which is located toward the direction growing the secondary recrystallized grain. Thereby, it is possible to increase the occurrence frequency of the switching, and possible to maintain the occurrence of the switching.


The condition (D) is the condition for the temperature range which corresponds to the nucleating stage and the grain-growing stage in the secondary recrystallization. The hold in the temperature range is important for the favorable occurrence of the secondary recrystallization. However, when the holding time is excessive, the primary recrystallized grain tends to be grow. For instance, when the grain size of the primary recrystallized grain becomes excessively large, the dislocations tend not to be piled up (the dislocations are hardly piled up in front of the grain boundary which is located toward the direction growing the secondary recrystallized grain), and thus, the driving force of inducing the switching becomes insufficient. When the holding time in the above temperature range is controlled to 600 minutes or shorter, it is possible to grow the secondary recrystallized grain in the initial stage under conditions such that the grain growth of the primary recrystallized grain is suppressed. Thus, it is possible to increase the selectivity of the specific deviation angle. In the present embodiment, the starting temperature of the secondary recrystallization is controlling to be lower temperature by refining the primary recrystallized grain or by utilizing the Nb group element, and thereby, the switching regarding the deviation angle γ is sufficiently induced and maintained.


In the producing method according to the present embodiment, when the Nb group element is utilized, it is possible to obtain the grain oriented electrical steel sheet satisfying the conditions with respect to the switching according to the present embodiment, in so far as at least one of the conditions (A) and (B) is selectively satisfied without satisfying both. In other words, by controlling so as to increase the switching frequency as to the specific deviation angle (in a case of the present embodiment, the deviation angle γ) in the initial stage of secondary recrystallization, the secondary recrystallized grain is grown with conserving the misorientation derived from the switching, the effect is maintained till the final stage, and finally, the switching frequency increases. Moreover, when the above effect is maintained till the final stage and the switching newly occurs, the switching with large orientation change regarding the deviation angle γ occurs. As a result, the switching frequency regarding the deviation angle γ increases finally. Needless to explain, it is optimal to satisfy both conditions (A) and (B) even when the Nb group element is utilized.


Based on the method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment mentioned above, the secondary recrystallized grain may be controlled to be the state of being finely divided into the small domains where each deviation angle γ is slightly different. Specifically, based on the above method, the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB, in addition to the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB, may be elaborated in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as described in the first embodiment.


Next, preferred production conditions for the producing method according to the present embodiment are described.


In the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the final annealing process, when the total amount of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W in the chemical composition of the slab is not 0.0030 to 0.030%, in the heating stage, a holding time in 1000 to 1050° C. is preferably 300 to 1500 minutes.


In the same way, in the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the final annealing process, when the total amount of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W in the chemical composition of the slab is 0.0030 to 0.030%, in the heating stage, a holding time in 1000 to 1050° C. is preferably 150 to 900 minutes.


Hereinafter, the above production condition is referred to as the condition (E-1).


(E-1) In the heating stage of the final annealing, TE1 is defined as a holding time (total detention time) in the temperature range of 1000 to 1050° C.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%,


TE1: 150 minutes or longer.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is not the above range,


TE1: 300 minutes or longer.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%, the TE1 is preferably 200 minutes or longer, and more preferably 300 minutes or longer. The TE1 is preferably 900 minutes or shorter, and more preferably 600 minutes or shorter.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is not the above range, the TE1 is preferably 360 minutes or longer, and more preferably 600 minutes or longer. The TE1 is preferably 1500 minutes or shorter, and more preferably 900 minutes or shorter.


The condition (E-1) is a factor for controlling the elongation direction of the γ subboundary in the plane of the steel sheet where the switching occurs. By sufficiently conducting the holding in 1000 to 1050° C., it is possible to increase the switching frequency in the rolling direction. It seems that the morphology (for instance, array and shape) of the precipitates including the inhibitor in the steel is changed during the holding in the above temperature range, and thereby, the switching frequency increases in the rolling direction.


Since the steel sheet being subjected to the final annealing has been hot-rolled and cold-rolled, the array and shape of the precipitates (in particular, MnS) in the steel show anisotropic in the plane of the steel sheet, and may tend to be uneven in the rolling direction. The details are not clear, but it seems that the holding in the above temperature range changes the unevenness in the rolling direction as to the morphology of the above precipitates, and influences the direction in which the γ subboundary tends to be elongate in the plane of the steel sheet during the growth of the secondary recrystallized grain. Specifically, when the steel sheet is held at relatively higher temperature such as 1000 to 1050° C., the unevenness in the rolling direction as to the morphology of the precipitates in the steel disappears. Thereby, the tendency such that the γ subboundary elongates in the rolling direction decreases, and the tendency such that the γ subboundary elongates in the transverse direction increases. As a result, it seems that the frequency of the γ subboundary detected in the rolling direction increases.


Herein, when the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%, the existence frequency of the γ subboundary in itself is high, and thus, it is possible to obtain the effects of the present embodiment even when the holding time of the condition (E-1) is insufficient.


By the producing method including the above condition (E-1), it is possible to control the grain size of the γ subgrain in the rolling direction to be smaller than the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain in the rolling direction. Specifically, by simultaneously controlling the above condition (E-1), it is possible to control the grain size RA and the grain size RBL, to satisfy 1.10≤RBL÷RAL in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as described in the second embodiment.


Moreover, in the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the final annealing process, when the total amount of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W in the chemical composition of the slab is not 0.0030 to 0.030%, in the heating stage, a holding time in 950 to 1000° C. is preferably 300 to 1500 minutes.


In the same way, in the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the final annealing process, when the total amount of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W in the chemical composition of the slab is 0.0030 to 0.030%, in the heating stage, a holding time in 950 to 1000° C. is preferably 150 to 900 minutes.


Hereinafter, the above production condition is referred to as the condition (E-2).


(E-2) In the heating stage of the final annealing, TE2 is defined as a holding time (total detention time) in the temperature range of 950 to 1000° C.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%,


TE2: 150 minutes or longer.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is not the above range,


TE2: 300 minutes or longer.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%, the TE2 is preferably 200 minutes or longer, and more preferably 300 minutes or longer. The TE2 is preferably 900 minutes or shorter, and more preferably 600 minutes or shorter.


When the total amount of the Nb group element is not the above range, the TE2 is preferably 360 minutes or longer, and more preferably 600 minutes or longer. The TE2 is preferably 1500 minutes or shorter, and more preferably 900 minutes or shorter.


The condition (E-2) is a factor for controlling the elongation direction of the γ subboundary in the plane of the steel sheet where the switching occurs. By sufficiently conducting the holding in 950 to 1000° C., it is possible to increase the switching frequency in the transverse direction. It seems that the morphology (for instance, array and shape) of the precipitates including the inhibitor in the steel is changed during the holding in the above temperature range, and thereby, the switching frequency increases in the transverse direction.


Since the steel sheet being subjected to the final annealing has been hot-rolled and cold-rolled, the array and shape of the precipitates (in particular, MnS) in the steel show anisotropic in the plane of the steel sheet, and may tend to be uneven in the rolling direction. The details are not clear, but it seems that the holding in the above temperature range changes the unevenness in the rolling direction as to the morphology of the above precipitates, and influences the direction in which the γ subboundary tends to be elongate in the plane of the steel sheet during the growth of the secondary recrystallized grain. Specifically, when the steel sheet is held at relatively lower temperature such as 950 to 1000° C., the unevenness in the rolling direction as to the morphology of the precipitates in the steel develops. Thereby, the tendency such that the γ subboundary elongates in the transverse direction decreases, and the tendency such that the γ subboundary elongates in the rolling direction increases. As a result, it seems that the frequency of the γ subboundary detected in the transverse direction increases.


Herein, when the total amount of the Nb group element is 0.0030 to 0.030%, the existence frequency of the γ subboundary in itself is high, and thus, it is possible to obtain the effects of the present embodiment even when the holding time of the condition (E-2) is insufficient.


By the producing method including the above condition (E-2), it is possible to control the grain size of the γ subgrain in the transverse direction to be smaller than the grain size of the secondary recrystallized grain in the transverse direction. Specifically, by simultaneously controlling the above condition (E-2), it is possible to control the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC to satisfy 1.10≤RBC÷RAC in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as described in the third embodiment.


Moreover, in the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the heating stage of the final annealing, it is preferable that the secondary recrystallization is proceeded with giving the thermal gradient of more than 0.5° C./cm in a border area between primary recrystallized area and secondary recrystallized area in the steel sheet. For instance, it is preferable to give the above thermal gradient to the steel sheet in which the secondary recrystallized grain grows in progress in the temperature range of 800 to 1150° C. in the heating stage of the final annealing.


Moreover, it is preferable that the direction to give the above thermal gradient is the transverse direction C.


The final annealing process can be effectively utilized as a process for controlling the shape of the γ subgrain to be anisotropic in plane. For instance, when the coiled steel sheet is heated after placing in a box type annealing furnace, the position and arrangement of the heating device and the temperature distribution in the annealing furnace may be controlled so as to make the outside and inside of the coil have a sufficient temperature difference. Alternatively, the temperature distribution may be purposely applied to the coil being subjected to the annealing by actively heating only part of the coil with arranging induction heating, high frequency heating, electric heating, and the like.


The method of giving the thermal gradient is not particularly limited, and a known method may be applied. By giving the thermal gradient to the steel sheet, the secondary recrystallized grain having the ideal orientation is nucleated from the area where the secondary recrystallization is likely to start antecedently in the coil, and the secondary recrystallized grain grows anisotropically due to the thermal gradient. For instance, it is possible to grow the secondary recrystallized grain throughout the entire coil. Thus, it is possible to favorably control the anisotropy in plane as to the shape of the γ subgrain.


In a case where the coiled steel sheet is heated, the coil edge tends to be antecedently heated. Thus, it is preferable that the secondary recrystallized grain is grown by giving the thermal gradient from a widthwise edge (edge in the transverse direction of the steel sheet) toward the other edge.


When considering that the desired magnetic characteristics are obtained by controlling to the Goss orientation, and when considering the industrial productivity, the secondary recrystallized grain may be grown with giving the thermal gradient of more than 0.5° C./cm (preferably, 0.7° C./cm or more) in the final annealing. It is preferable that the direction to give the above thermal gradient is the transverse direction C. The upper limit of the thermal gradient is not particularly limited, but it is preferable that the secondary recrystallized grain is continuously grown under the condition such that the thermal gradient is maintained. When considering the heat conduction of the steel sheet and the growth rate of the secondary recrystallized grain, the upper limit of the thermal gradient may be 10° C./cm for instance in so far as the general producing method.


By the producing method including the above condition regarding the thermal gradient, it is possible to control the grain size of the γ subgrain in the rolling direction to be smaller than the grain size of the γ subgrain in the transverse direction. Specifically, by simultaneously controlling the above condition regarding the thermal gradient, it is possible to control the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC to satisfy 1.15≤RAC÷RAL in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as described in the fourth embodiment.


Moreover, in the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the heating stage of the final annealing, a holding time in 1050 to 1100° C. is preferably 300 to 1200 minutes.


Hereinafter, the above production condition is referred to as the condition (F).


(F) In the heating stage of the final annealing, when TF is defined as a holding time in the temperature range of 1050 to 1100° C.,


TF: 300 to 1200 minutes.


In a case where the secondary recrystallization is not finished at 1050° C. in the heating stage of the final annealing, by decreasing the heating rate in 1050 to 1100° C., specifically by controlling the TF to be 300 to 1200 minutes, the secondary recrystallization maintains up to higher temperature, and thus, the magnetic flux density is favorably improved. For instance, the TF is preferably 400 minutes or longer, and is preferably 700 minutes or shorter. On the other hand, in a case where the secondary recrystallization is finished at 1050° C. in the heating stage of the final annealing, it is not needed to control the condition (F). For instance, when the secondary recrystallization is finished at 1050° C. in the heating stage, the heating rate may be increased as compared with the conventional techniques in the temperature range of 1050° C. or higher. Thereby, it is possible to shorten the time for the final annealing, and possible to reduce the production cost.


In the producing method according to the present embodiment, in the final annealing process, the three conditions of the condition (A), the condition (B), and the condition (D) are basically controlled as described above, and as required, the condition (E-1), the condition (E-2), and/or the condition of the thermal gradient may be combined. For instance, the plural conditions from the condition (E-1), the condition (E-2), and/or the condition of the thermal gradient may be combined. Moreover, the condition (F) may be combined as required.


The method for producing the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes the processes as described above. The producing method according to the present embodiment may further include, as necessary, insulation coating forming process after the final annealing process.


(Insulation Coating Forming Process)


In the insulation coating forming process, the insulation coating is formed on the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (final annealed sheet) after the final annealing process. The insulation coating which mainly includes phosphate and colloidal silica, the insulation coating which mainly includes alumina sol and boric acid, and the like may be formed on the steel sheet after the final annealing.


For instance, a coating solution including phosphoric acid or phosphate, chromic anhydride or chromate, and colloidal silica is applied to the steel sheet after the final annealing, and is baked (for instance, 350 to 1150° C. for 5 to 300 seconds) to form the insulation coating. When the insulation coating is formed, the oxidation degree and the dew point of the atmosphere may be controlled as necessary.


Alternatively, a coating solution including alumina sol and boric acid is applied to the steel sheet after the final annealing, and is baked (for instance, 750 to 1350° C. for 10 to 100 seconds) to form the insulation coating. When the insulation coating is formed, the oxidation degree and the dew point of the atmosphere may be controlled as necessary.


The producing method according to the present embodiment may further include, as necessary, a magnetic domain refinement process.


(Magnetic Domain Refinement Process)


In the magnetic domain refinement process, the magnetic domain is refined for the grain oriented electrical steel sheet. For instance, the local minute strain may be applied or the local grooves may be formed by a known method such as laser, plasma, mechanical methods, etching, and the like for the grain oriented electrical steel sheet. The above magnetic domain refining treatment does not deteriorate the effects of the present embodiment.


Herein, the local minute strain and the local grooves mentioned above become an irregular point when measuring the crystal orientation and the grain size defined in the present embodiment. Thus, when the crystal orientation is measured, it is preferable to make the measurement points not overlap the local minute strain and the local grooves. Moreover, when the grain size is calculated, the local minute strain and the local grooves are not recognized as the boundary.


(Mechanism of Occurrence of Switching)


The switching specified in the present embodiment occurs during the grain growth of the secondary recrystallized grain. The phenomenon is influenced by various control conditions such as the chemical composition of material (slab), the elaboration of inhibitor until the grain growth of secondary recrystallized grain, and the control of the grain size of primary recrystallized grain. Thus, in order to control the switching, it is necessary to control not only one condition but plural conditions comprehensively and inseparably.


It seems that the switching occurs due to the boundary energy and the surface energy between the adjacent grains.


In regard to the above boundary energy, when the two grains with the misorientation are adjacent, the boundary energy increases. Thus, in the grain growth of the secondary recrystallized grain, it seems that the switching occurs so as to decrease the boundary energy, specifically, so as to be close to a specific same direction.


Moreover, in regard to the above surface energy, even when the orientation deviates slightly from the {110} plane which has high crystal symmetry, the surface energy increases. Thus, in the grain growth of the secondary recrystallized grain, it seems that the switching occurs so as to decrease the surface energy, specifically, so as to decrease the deviation angle by being close to the orientation of the {110} plane.


However, in the general situation, these energies do not give the driving force that induces the orientation changes, and thus, that the switching does not occur in the grain growth of the secondary recrystallized grain. In the general situation, the secondary recrystallized grain grows with maintaining the misorientation or the deviation angle. For instance, in a case where the secondary recrystallized grain grows in the general situation, the switching regarding the deviation angle γ is not induced, and the deviation angle γ corresponds to an angle derived from the unevenness of the orientation at nucleating the secondary recrystallized grain. In addition, the σ(|γ|) which is the final standard deviation of the absolute value of the deviation angle γ also corresponds to the value derived from the unevenness of the orientation at nucleating the secondary recrystallized grain. In other words, the deviation angle γ hardly changes in the growing stage of the secondary recrystallized grain.


On the other hand, as the grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to the present embodiment, in a case where the secondary recrystallization is made to start from lower temperature and where the grain growth of secondary recrystallized grain is made to maintain up to higher temperature for a long time, the switching is sufficiently induced. The above reason is not entirely clear, but it seems that the above reason is related to the dislocations at relatively high densities which remain in the tip area of the growing secondary recrystallized grain, that is, in the area adjoining the primary recrystallized grain, in order to cancel the geometrical misorientation during the grain growth of the secondary recrystallized grain. It seems that the above residual dislocations correspond to the switching and the γ subboundary which are the features of the present embodiment.


In the present embodiment, since the secondary recrystallization starts from lower temperature as compared with the conventional techniques, the annihilation of the dislocations delays, the dislocations gather and pile up in front of the grain boundary which is located toward the direction growing the secondary recrystallized grain, and then, the dislocation density increases. Thus, the atom tends to be rearranged in the tip area of the growing secondary recrystallized grain, and as a result, it seems that the switching occurs so as to decrease the misorientation with the adjoining secondary recrystallized grain, that is, to decrease the boundary energy or the surface energy.


The switching leaves the boundary (γ subboundary) having the specific orientation relationship in the secondary recrystallized grain. Herein, in a case where another secondary recrystallized grain nucleates and the growing secondary recrystallized grain reaches the nucleated secondary recrystallized grain before the switching occurs, the grain growth terminates, and thereafter, the switching itself does not occur. Thus, in the present embodiment, it is advantageous to control the nucleation frequency of new secondary recrystallized grain to decrease in the growing stage of secondary recrystallized grain, and advantageous to control the grain growth to be the state such that only already-existing secondary recrystallized grain keeps growing. In the present embodiment, it is preferable to concurrently utilize the inhibitor which controls the starting temperature of the secondary recrystallization to be lower temperature and the inhibitor which are stable up to relatively higher temperature.


In the present embodiment, the reason why the switching regarding the deviation angle γ occurs as the main orientation change is not entirely clear, but is presumed as follows. It seems that the direction in which the orientation is changed by the switching is influenced by the dislocation type which is regarded to as the basis of the switching (specifically, the burgers vector and the like of the dislocations which are piled up in the tip area of the growing secondary recrystallized grain during the growing stage). In the present embodiment, when the deviation angle γ is controlled, the control condition of the inhibitor in relatively higher temperature of the secondary recrystallization (e.g. the above condition (B)) is dominantly influenced. For instance, when the inhibitor intensity varies depending on the atmosphere in the temperature range of 1000° C. or lower, the contribution of the deviation angle γ to the switching decreases. In other word, the timing when the inhibitor weakens influences the control of the primary recrystallized structure (the control of orientation and size), the annihilation of the dislocation piled up, and the growth rate of the secondary recrystallized grain. As a result, it seems that the direction of the switching induced in the growing secondary recrystallized grain (i.e. the type and the amount of the dislocation which remains in the secondary recrystallized grain) is changed.


EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the effects of an aspect of the present invention are described in detail with reference to the following examples. However, the condition in the examples is an example condition employed to confirm the operability and the effects of the present invention, so that the present invention is not limited to the example condition. The present invention can employ various types of conditions as long as the conditions do not depart from the scope of the present invention and can achieve the object of the present invention.


Example 1

Using slabs with chemical composition shown in Table A1 as materials, grain oriented electrical steel sheets (silicon steel sheets) with chemical composition shown in Table A2 were produced. The chemical compositions were measured by the above-mentioned methods. In Table A1 and Table A2, “-” indicates that the control and production conscious of content did not perform and thus the content was not measured. Moreover, in Table A1 and Table A2, the value with “<” indicates that, although the control and production conscious of content performed and the content was measured, the measured value with sufficient reliability as the content was not obtained (the measurement result was less than detection limit).










TABLE A1







STEEL
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SLAB(STEEL PIECE)(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)




















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W























A1
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.026
0.008
0.07

0.001






A2
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.026
0.008
0.07

0.005






B1
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.025
0.008
0.07
0.002







B2
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.025
0.008
0.07
0.002
0.008






C1
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20








C2
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.002






C3
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.003






C4
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.005






C5
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.01 






C6
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.02 






C7
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.03 






C8
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.05 






D1
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.001






D2
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.009






D3
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.009






E
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03


0.005





F
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03



0.015




G
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03

0.005


0.005



H
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03




0.007



I
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03





0.015


J
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03

0.010

0.010




K
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03

0.002
0.004

0.004



L
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03


0.006

0.004


















TABLE A2








CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GRAIN ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL


STEEL
SHEET(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)




















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W























A1
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07








A2
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07

0.004






B1
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07
<0.001







B2
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07
<0.001
0.006






C1
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20








C2
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.001






C3
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.003






C4
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.003






C5
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.007






C6
0.002
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.018






C7
0.004
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.028






C8
0.006
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.048






D1
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.001






D2
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.007






D3
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

<0.001 






E
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03


0.006





F
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03



0.015




G
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.004


0.005



H
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03




0.010



I
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03





0.015


J
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.008

0.008




K
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.001
0.003

0.003



L
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03


0.004

0.003










The grain oriented electrical steel sheets were produced under production conditions shown in Table A3 to Table A7. Specifically, after casting the slabs, hot rolling, hot band annealing, cold rolling, and decarburization annealing were conducted. For some steel sheets after decarburization annealing, nitridation was conducted in mixed atmosphere of hydrogen, nitrogen, and ammonia.


Annealing separator which mainly included MgO was applied to the steel sheets, and then final annealing was conducted. In final stage of the final annealing, the steel sheets were held at 1200° C. for 20 hours in hydrogen atmosphere (purification annealing), and then were naturally cooled.











TABLE A3









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





1001
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1002
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1003
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1004
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1005
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1006
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1007
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1008
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1009
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1010
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1011
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1012
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1013
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1014
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1015
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1016
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1017
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1018
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1019
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1020
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN





PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT











CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE1
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE







1001
C1
22
220
0.020
0.001
720
180
300



1002
C1
22
250
0.020
0.001
720
180
300



1003
C1
22
300
0.020
0.001
720
180
300



1004
C1
22
160
0.020
0.002
720
300
300



1005
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
720
300
300



1006
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
600
300
300



1007
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
480
300
300



1008
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
360
300
300



1009
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
240
300
300



1010
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
180
300
300



1011
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
120
300
300



1012
C1
22
220
0.100
0.002
60
300
300



1013
C1
22
220
0.100
0.005
420
300
300



1014
C1
22
220
0.100
0.020
420
300
300



1015
C1
22
220
0.100
0.030
420
300
300



1016
C1
22
220
0.200
0.050
420
300
300



1017
C1
22
220
0.200
0.002
420
300
600



1018
C1
22
220
0.300
0.002
420
300
600



1019
C1
22
220
0.600
0.002
420
300
600



1020
C1
22
220
1.000
0.002
360
300
600



















TABLE A4









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





1021
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1022
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1023
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1024
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1025
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1026
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1027
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1028
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1029
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1030
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1031
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1032
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1033
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1034
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1035
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1036
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1037
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1038
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1039
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1040
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN





PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT











CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE1
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE







1021
C1
22
300
2.000
0.001
360
300
600



1022
C1
22
300
0.050
0.001
360
150
600



1023
C1
22
300
0.100
0.002
360
300
600



1024
D1
23
220
0.050
0.001
300
150
300



1025
D1
23
220
0.050
0.001
300
300
300



1026
D1
23
220
0.200
0.001
300
300
300



1027
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
300
300



1028
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
150
300



1029
D1
23
220
0.200
0.001
300
150
300



1030
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
150
300



1031
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
300
300



1032
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
600
300



1033
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
900
300



1034
D1
23
220
0.200
0.002
300
1500
300



1035
D2
17
220
0.020
0.001
720
150
300



1036
D2
17
220
0.020
0.002
720
90
300



1037
D2
17
220
0.200
0.001
720
90
300



1038
D2
17
220
0.020
0.001
600
90
300



1039
D2
17
220
0.020
0.002
600
150
300



1040
D2
17
220
0.020
0.002
600
300
300



















TABLE A5









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE OF
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





1041
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1042
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1043
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1044
D3
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1045
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1046
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1047
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1048
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1049
C1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1050
C2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1051
C3
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1052
C4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1053
C5
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1054
C6
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1055
C7
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1056
C8
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1057
D1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1058
D2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1059
E
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1060
F
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN





PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT











CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE1
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE







1041
D2
17
190
0.200
0.002
420
300
300



1042
D2
17
160
0.300
0.002
420
300
300



1043
D2
17
220
0.400
0.002
420
300
300



1044
D3
17
220
0.500
0.005
300
600
300



1045
D2
17
220
0.600
0.002
420
300
300



1046
D2
17
180
1.000
0.002
420
600
300



1047
D2
17
180
2.000
0.002
420
600
300



1048
D2
17
220
2.000
0.002
420
600
300



1049
C1
23
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1050
C2
24
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1051
C3
20
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1052
C4
17
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1053
C5
16
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1054
C6
15
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1055
C7
13
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1056
C8
12
210
0.200
0.010
360
150
300



1057
D1
24
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1058
D2
17
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1059
E
22
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1060
F
19
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



















TABLE A6









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE OF
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





1061
G
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1062
H
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1063
I
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1064
J
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1065
K
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1066
L
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


1067
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1068
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1069
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1070
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1071
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1072
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1073
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1074
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1075
A1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1076
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1077
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1078
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1079
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1080
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN SIZE
NITROGEN






OF PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT











CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE1
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE







1061
G
15
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1062
H
15
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1063
I
23
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1064
J
17
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1065
K
15
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1066
L
15
220
0.400
0.002
240
150
300



1067
A1
9

0.200
0.0015
300
150
300



1068
A1
9

0.200
0.003
300
150
300



1069
A1
9

0.200
0.003
300
300
300



1070
A1
9

0.200
0.0015
300
300
300



1071
A1
9

0.500
0.020
300
300
300



1072
A1
9

0.500
0.003
300
900
300



1073
A1
9

0.200
0.020
300
300
300



1074
A1
9

0.200
0.003
300
900
300



1075
A1
9

0.050
0.003
300
900
300



1076
A2
7

0.200
0.0015
300
150
300



1077
A2
7

0.200
0.003
300
150
300



1078
A2
7

0.200
0.003
300
150
300



1079
A2
7

0.200
0.0015
300
300
300



1080
A2
7

0.500
0.020
300
300
300



















TABLE A7









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE OF
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





1081
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1082
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1083
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1084
A2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1085
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1086
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1087
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1088
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1089
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1090
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1091
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1092
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1093
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1094
B1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1095
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1096
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1097
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1098
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1099
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1100
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1101
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1102
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


1103
B2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN





PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT











CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE1
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE







1081
A2
7

0.500
0.003
300
600
300



1082
A2
7

0.200
0.020
300
300
300



1083
A2
7

0.200
0.003
300
600
300



1084
A2
7

0.050
0.003
300
900
300



1085
B1
10

0.100
0.004
600
300
300



1086
B1
10

0.100
0.010
600
600
300



1087
B1
10

1.000
0.010
600
300
300



1088
B1
10

1.000
0.004
600
300
300



1089
B1
10

0.400
0.010
600
900
300



1090
B1
10

0.010
0.004
600
900
300



1091
B1
10

2.000
0.004
600
90
300



1092
B1
10

2.000
0.050
600
900
300



1093
B1
10

0.030
0.004
600
150
300



1094
B1
10

2.000
0.004
600
150
300



1095
B2
8

0.100
0.004
600
300
300



1096
B2
8

0.100
0.010
600
600
300



1097
B2
8

2.000
0.010
600
300
300



1098
B2
8

2.000
0.004
600
300
300



1099
B2
8

0.400
0.010
600
900
300



1100
B2
8

0.010
0.004
600
900
300



1101
B2
8

2.000
0.004
600
90
300



1102
B2
8

0.020
0.004
600
150
300



1103
B2
8

2.000
0.004
600
150
300










Coating solution for forming the insulation coating which mainly included phosphate and colloidal silica and which included chromium was applied on primary layer (intermediate layer) formed on the surface of produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets (final annealed sheets). The above steel sheets were heated and held in atmosphere of 75 volume % hydrogen and 25 volume % nitrogen, were cooled, and thereby the insulation coating was formed.


The produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets had the intermediate layer which was arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet) and the insulation coating which was arranged in contact with the intermediate layer, when viewing the cross section whose cutting direction is parallel to thickness direction. The intermediate layer was forsterite film whose average thickness was 2 μm, and the insulation coating was the coating which mainly included phosphate and colloidal silica and whose average thickness was 1 μm.


Various characteristics of the obtained grain oriented electrical steel sheet were evaluated. The evaluation results are shown in Table A8 to Table A12.


(1) Crystal Orientation of Grain Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet


Crystal orientation of grain oriented electrical steel sheet was measured by the above-mentioned method. Deviation angle was identified from the crystal orientation at each measurement point, and the boundary between two adjacent measurement points was identified based on the above deviation angles. When the boundary condition is evaluated by using two measurement points whose interval is 1 mm and when the value obtained by dividing “the number of boundaries satisfying the boundary condition BA” by “the number of boundaries satisfying the boundary condition BB” is 1.10 or more, the steel sheet is judged to include “the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB”, and the steel sheet is represented such that “switching boundary” exists in the Tables. Here, “the number of boundaries satisfying the boundary condition BA” corresponds to the boundary of the case 1 and/or the case 3 in Table 1 as shown above, and “the number of boundaries satisfying the boundary condition BB” corresponds to the boundary of the case 1 and/or the case 2. The average grain size was calculated based on the above identified boundaries. Moreover, σ(|γ|) which was a standard deviation of an absolute value of the deviation angle γ was measured by the above-mentioned method.


(2) Magnetic Characteristics of Grain Oriented Electrical Steel


Magnetic characteristics of the grain oriented electrical steel were measured based on the single sheet tester (SST) method regulated by JIS C 2556: 2015.


As the magnetic characteristics, the iron loss W17/50 (W/kg) which was defined as the power loss per unit weight (1 kg) of the steel sheet was measured under the conditions of 50 Hz of AC frequency and 1.7 T of excited magnetic flux density. Moreover, the magnetic flux density B8(T) in the rolling direction of the steel sheet was measured under the condition such that the steel sheet was excited at 800 A/m.


In addition, as the magnetic characteristics, the magnetostriction λp-p@1.9 T generated in the steel sheet was measured under the conditions of 50 Hz of AC frequency and 1.9 T of excited magnetic flux density. Specifically, using the maximum length Lmax and the minimum length Lmin of the test piece (steel sheet) under the above excitation condition and using the length L0 of the test piece under 0 T of the magnetic flux density, the magnetostriction λp-p@1.9 T was calculated based on λp-p@1.9 T=(Lmax−Lmin)÷L0.












TABLE A8









PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBL
RAL
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBL/RAL
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















1001
C1
NONE
0.88
26.0
29.5
4.53
1.909
0.880
0.890
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1002
C1
NONE
0.87
29.5
34.0
4.37
1.916
0.881
0.876
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1003
C1
NONE
0.88
35.8
40.9
4.14
1.925
0.872
0.860
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1004
C1
NONE
0.91
21.2
23.3
4.68
1.905
0.668
0.899
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1005
C1
NONE
0.93
27.3
29.5
4.36
1.917
0.649
0.875
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1006
C1
EXISTENCE
1.13
24.1
21.4
3.81
1.920
0.446
0.872
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1007
C1
EXISTENCE
1.16
24.8
21.3
3.19
1.920
0.428
0.872
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1008
C1
EXISTENCE
1.20
23.0
19.1
3.15
1.920
0.413
0.869
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1009
C1
EXISTENCE
1.21
23.3
19.2
3.74
1.920
0.417
0.869
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1010
C1
EXISTENCE
1.16
23.8
20.4
3.18
1.919
0.429
0.869
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1011
C1
EXISTENCE
1.12
24.3
21.7
3.78
1.918
0.445
0.872
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1012
C1
NONE
0.94
27.4
29.3
4.04
1.917
0.649
0.876
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1013
C1
EXISTENCE
1.24
25.0
20.1
3.04
1.924
0.395
0.865
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1014
C1
EXISTENCE
1.25
24.6
19.7
3.01
1.923
0.397
0.863
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1015
C1
EXISTENCE
1.16
24.1
20.8
3.19
1.920
0.427
0.870
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1016
C1
NONE
0.99
25.6
25.9
3.28
1.915
0.546
0.879
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1017
C1
EXISTENCE
1.16
23.4
20.2
3.20
1.924
0.385
0.858
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1018
C1
EXISTENCE
1.22
23.9
19.6
3.04
1.929
0.363
0.852
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1019
C1
EXISTENCE
1.23
24.4
19.8
3.04
1.929
0.363
0.852
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1020
C1
EXISTENCE
1.21
22.8
18.8
3.16
1.926
0.371
0.856
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE A9








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBL
RAL
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBL/RAL
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















1021
C1
NONE
0.99
33.8
34.3
3.04
1.932
0.519
0.841
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1022
C1
NONE
0.97
32.5
33.4
3.43
1.932
0.522
0.845
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1023
C1
EXISTENCE
1.22
32.1
26.4
2.52
1.941
0.360
0.827
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1024
D1
NONE
0.96
23.2
24.1
4.53
1.905
0.611
0.899
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1025
D1
NONE
0.96
24.3
25.2
3.35
1.909
0.606
0.896
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1026
D1
NONE
0.99
26.5
26.9
3.41
1.911
0.585
0.890
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1027
D1
EXISTENCE
1.22
22.4
18.3
3.77
1.914
0.461
0.881
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1028
D1
NONE
1.00
25.3
25.3
4.42
1.911
0.588
0.892
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1029
D1
NONE
0.98
24.3
24.8
3.98
1.909
0.598
0.894
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1030
D1
NONE
0.98
25.2
25.6
4.08
1.911
0.585
0.890
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1031
D1
EXISTENCE
1.19
23.8
19.9
3.78
1.916
0.462
0.883
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1032
D1
EXISTENCE
1.29
24.3
18.9
2.99
1.917
0.433
0.876
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1033
D1
EXISTENCE
1.31
24.3
18.5
3.00
1.918
0.431
0.874
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1034
D1
EXISTENCE
1.21
24.2
20.0
3.15
1.915
0.464
0.881
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1035
D2
NONE
0.89
26.1
29.2
4.03
1.929
0.719
0.850
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1036
D2
NONE
0.97
22.9
23.7
3.97
1.934
0.529
0.840
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1037
D2
NONE
0.97
23.1
23.8
3.67
1.935
0.530
0.841
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1038
D2
NONE
1.00
23.2
23.2
3.96
1.934
0.500
0.840
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1039
D2
EXISTENCE
1.16
24.8
21.4
2.51
1.938
0.386
0.830
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1040
D2
EXISTENCE
1.17
24.7
21.0
3.01
1.942
0.386
0.825
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE A10








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBL
RAL
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBL/RAL
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















1041
D2
EXISTENCE
1.40
24.2
17.2
2.32
1.942
0.318
0.822
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1042
D2
EXISTENCE
1.50
24.0
16.0
2.40
1.940
0.310
0.826
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1043
D2
EXISTENCE
1.50
24.2
16.2
1.97
1.951
0.299
0.805
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1044
D3
EXISTENCE
1.82
25.1
13.8
1.67
1.957
0.252
0.791
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1045
D2
EXISTENCE
1.47
25.5
17.3
2.18
1.952
0.296
0.805
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1046
D2
EXISTENCE
1.48
25.0
16.9
2.25
1.945
0.306
0.817
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1047
D2
EXISTENCE
1.35
24.8
18.3
2.95
1.942
0.336
0.824
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1048
D2
EXISTENCE
1.33
25.2
19.0
2.15
1.947
0.332
0.815
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1049
C1
NONE
1.00
12.1
12.1
3.71
1.918
0.539
0.872
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1050
C2
NONE
1.00
12.1
12.1
3.93
1.917
0.540
0.874
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1051
C3
EXISTENCE
1.38
24.1
17.4
2.48
1.930
0.399
0.832
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1052
C4
EXISTENCE
1.46
25.3
17.3
2.53
1.944
0.333
0.810
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1053
C5
EXISTENCE
1.45
23.6
16.3
2.10
1.946
0.333
0.811
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1054
C6
EXISTENCE
1.46
23.8
16.3
2.11
1.945
0.330
0.808
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1055
C7
EXISTENCE
1.39
24.1
17.4
2.45
1.931
0.400
0.840
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1056
C8
NONE
0.99
13.0
13.2
4.01
1.925
0.491
0.883
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1057
D1
NONE
1.00
12.4
12.5
4.33
1.917
0.537
0.883
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1058
D2
EXISTENCE
1.45
25.1
17.3
2.92
1.947
0.312
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1059
E
EXISTENCE
1.36
25.1
18.5
3.10
1.925
0.446
0.846
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1060
F
EXISTENCE
1.45
23.7
16.3
2.11
1.941
0.366
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE A11








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBL
RAL
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBL/RAL
mm
mm
σ(|r|)
T
@1.9T
W/kg
NOTE




















1061
G
EXISTENCE
1.43
23.7
16.6
2.10
1.947
0.311
0.830
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1062
H
EXISTENCE
1.43
24.1
16.8
2.61
1.947
0.309
0.829
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1063
I
EXISTENCE
1.37
23.8
17.4
2.46
1.922
0.490
0.847
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1064
J
EXISTENCE
1.43
23.6
16.5
2.13
1.949
0.310
0.830
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1065
K
EXISTENCE
1.45
24.0
16.5
2.14
1.948
0.312
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1066
L
EXISTENCE
1.45
23.9
16.5
2.74
1.947
0.310
0.829
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1067
A1
NONE
0.98
11.6
11.8
3.35
1.923
0.532
0.878
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1068
A1
NONE
1.00
12.7
12.7
3.72
1.927
0.520
0.875
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1069
A1
EXISTENCE
1.22
27.5
22.5
2.85
1.929
0.383
0.865
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1070
A1
NONE
1.01
11.6
11.5
3.21
1.925
0.516
0.875
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1071
A1
EXISTENCE
1.42
43.4
30.7
2.56
1.938
0.327
0.850
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1072
A1
EXISTENCE
1.41
41.6
29.6
2.57
1.936
0.326
0.850
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1073
A1
EXISTENCE
1.31
34.3
26.2
2.69
1.933
0.353
0.859
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1074
A1
EXISTENCE
1.30
34.4
26.5
2.73
1.933
0.351
0.859
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1075
A1
NONE
1.06
16.0
15.1
3.63
1.928
0.464
0.867
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1076
A2
EXISTENCE
1.28
25.0
19.5
2.49
1.949
0.345
0.828
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1077
A2
EXISTENCE
1.39
23.4
16.8
1.94
1.951
0.315
0.822
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1078
A2
EXISTENCE
1.39
24.1
17.4
1.95
1.953
0.318
0.823
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1079
A2
EXISTENCE
1.27
25.1
19.7
1.98
1.952
0.340
0.824
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1080
A2
EXISTENCE
1.71
25.0
14.7
1.51
1.961
0.258
0.800
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE A12








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBL
RAL
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBL/RAL
mm
mm
σ(|r|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















1081
A2
EXISTENCE
1.62
25.1
15.5
1.87
1.961
0.269
0.804
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1082
A2
EXISTENCE
1.57
23.9
15.2
1.68
1.959
0.276
0.807
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1083
A2
EXISTENCE
1.52
25.4
16.7
1.63
1.958
0.286
0.809
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1084
A2
EXISTENCE
1.34
23.5
17.5
1.88
1.954
0.322
0.817
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1085
B1
EXISTENCE
1.12
23.0
20.6
3.50
1.929
0.415
0.868
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1086
B1
EXISTENCE
1.27
32.6
25.7
3.23
1.937
0.353
0.853
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1087
B1
EXISTENCE
1.18
27.5
23.2
3.37
1.932
0.388
0.861
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1088
B1
EXISTENCE
1.13
23.0
20.5
3.49
1.929
0.415
0.866
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1089
B1
EXISTENCE
1.37
40.6
29.7
2.46
1.940
0.333
0.845
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1090
B1
NONE
1.04
15.8
15.2
4.10
1.928
0.467
0.868
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1091
B1
NONE
0.97
10.8
11.2
4.29
1.924
0.538
0.880
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1092
B1
NONE
0.96
10.0
10.4
3.47
1.925
0.537
0.873
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1093
B1
NONE
0.97
10.1
10.4
4.28
1.922
0.540
0.879
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1094
B1
NONE
0.98
11.5
11.7
3.97
1.923
0.539
0.880
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1095
B2
EXISTENCE
1.38
23.6
17.1
1.84
1.954
0.313
0.816
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1096
B2
EXISTENCE
1.49
24.5
16.5
1.59
1.959
0.287
0.804
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1097
B2
EXISTENCE
1.34
23.9
17.9
1.92
1.956
0.319
0.817
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1098
B2
EXISTENCE
1.31
23.5
18.0
2.77
1.951
0.331
0.821
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1099
B2
EXISTENCE
1.60
24.9
15.6
1.48
1.964
0.272
0.799
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1100
B2
EXISTENCE
1.33
24.7
18.6
2.46
1.954
0.325
0.818
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1101
B2
NONE
1.06
23.7
22.3
3.76
1.942
0.435
0.842
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


1102
B2
EXISTENCE
1.29
24.9
19.2
2.68
1.948
0.336
0.827
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


1103
B2
EXISTENCE
1.32
24.5
18.5
2.47
1.951
0.329
0.823
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE









The characteristics of grain oriented electrical steel sheet significantly vary depending on the chemical composition and the producing method. Thus, it is necessary to compare and analyze the evaluation results of characteristics within steel sheets whose chemical compositions and producing methods are appropriately classified. Hereinafter, the evaluation results of characteristics are explained by classifying the grain oriented electrical steels under some features in regard to the chemical compositions and the producing methods.


(Examples Produced by Low Temperature Slab Heating Process)


Nos. 1001 to 1066 were examples produced by a process in which slab heating temperature was decreased, nitridation was conducted after primary recrystallization, and thereby main inhibitor for secondary recrystallization was formed.


(Examples of Nos. 1001 to 1023)


Nos. 1001 to 1023 were examples in which the steel type without Nb was used and the conditions of PA, PB, TD, and TE1 were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 1001 to 1023, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.510 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 1001 to 1023, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Here, No. 1003 was the comparative example in which the inhibitor intensity was increased by controlling the N content after nitridation to be 300 ppm. In general, although increasing the nitrogen content by nitridation causes a decrease in productivity, increasing the nitrogen content by nitridation results in an increase in the inhibitor intensity, and thereby B8 increases. In No. 1003, B8 increased. However, in No. 1003, the conditions in final annealing were not preferable, and thus λp-p @1.9 T was insufficient. In other words, in No. 1003, the switching did not occur during final annealing, and as a result, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was not improved. On the other hand, No. 1006 was the inventive example in which the N content after nitridation was controlled to be 220 ppm. In No. 1006, although B8 was not a particularly high value, the conditions in final annealing were preferable, and thus λp-p @1.9 T became a preferred low value. In other words, in No. 1006, the switching occurred during final annealing, and as a result, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved.


Nos. 1017 to 1023 were examples in which the secondary recrystallization was maintained up to higher temperature by increasing TF In Nos. 1017 to 1023, B8 increased. However, in Nos. 1021 and 1022 among the above, the conditions in final annealing were not preferable, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was not improved as with No. 1003. On the other hand, in No. 1023 among the above, in addition to high value of B8, the conditions in final annealing were preferable, and thus λp-p @1.9 T became a preferred low value.


(Examples of Nos. 1024 to 1034)


Nos. 1024 to 1034 were examples in which the steel type including 0.001% of Nb as the slab was used and the conditions of PA, PB, and TE1 were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 1024 to 1034, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.580 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 1024 to 1034, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


(Examples of Nos. 1035 to 1048)


Nos. 1035 to 1048 were examples in which the steel type including 0.009% of Nb as the slab was used and the conditions of PA, PB, TD, and TE1 were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 1035 to 1048, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.490 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 1035 to 1048, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Here, in Nos. 1035 to 1048, the Nb content of the slab was 0.009%, Nb was purified during final annealing, and then the Nb content of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (final annealed sheet) was 0.007% or less. Nos. 1035 to 1048 included the preferred amount of Nb as the slab as compared with the above Nos. 1001 to 1034, and thus λp-p@1.9 T became a preferred low value. Moreover, B8 increased. As described above, when the slab including Nb was used and the conditions in final annealing were controlled, B8 and λp-p @1.9 T were favorably affected. In particular, No. 1044 was the inventive example in which the purification was elaborately performed in final annealing and the Nb content of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (final annealed sheet) became less than detection limit. In No. 1044, although it was difficult to confirm that Nb group element was utilized from the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as the final product, the above effects were clearly obtained.


(Examples of Nos. 1049 to 1056)


Nos. 1049 to 1056 were examples in which TE1 was controlled to be a short time of less than 300 minutes and the influence of Nb content was particularly confirmed.


In Nos. 1049 to 1056, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.490 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 1049 to 1056, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


As shown in Nos. 1049 to 1056, as long as 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % of Nb was included in the slab, the switching occurred during final annealing, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even when TE1 was the short time.


(Examples of Nos. 1057 to 1066)


Nos. 1057 to 1066 were examples in which TE1 was controlled to be the short time of less than 300 minutes and the influence of the amount of Nb group element was confirmed.


In Nos. 1057 to 1066, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.530 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 1057 to 1066, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


As shown in Nos. 1057 to 1066, as long as the predetermined amount of Nb group element except for Nb was included in the slab, the switching occurred during final annealing, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even when TE1 was the short time.


(Examples Produced by High Temperature Slab Heating Process)


Nos. 1067 to 1103 were examples produced by a process in which slab heating temperature was increased, MnS was sufficiently soluted during slab heating and was reprecipited during post process, and the reprecipited MnS was utilized as main inhibitor.


In Nos. 1067 to 1103, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.430 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 1067 to 1103, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Nos. 1085 to 1103 in the above Nos. 1067 to 1103 were examples in which Bi was included in the slab and thus B8 increased.


As shown in Nos. 1067 to 1103, as long as the conditions in final annealing were appropriately controlled, the switching occurred during final annealing, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even by the high temperature slab heating process. Moreover, as with the low temperature slab heating process, when the slab including Nb was used and the conditions in final annealing were controlled, B8 and λp-p @1.9 T were favorably affected by the high temperature slab heating process.


Example 2

Using slabs with chemical composition shown in Table B1 as materials, grain oriented electrical steel sheets with chemical composition shown in Table B2 were produced. The methods for measuring the chemical composition and the notation in the tables are the same as in the above Example 1.










TABLE B1







STEEL
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SLAB(STEEL PIECE)(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)




















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W























A1
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.026
0.008
0.07

0.001






A2
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.026
0.008
0.07

0.005






B1
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.025
0.008
0.07
0.002







B2
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.025
0.008
0.07
0.002
0.008






C1
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20








C2
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.002






C3
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.003






C4
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.005






C5
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.010






C6
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.020






C7
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.030






C8
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.050






D1
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.001






D2
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.009






D3
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.009






E
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03


0.005





F
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03



0.015




G
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03

0.005


0.005



H
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03




0.007



I
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03





0.015


J
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03

0.010

0.010




K
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03

0.002
0.004

0.004



L
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
<0.03


0.006

0.004


















TABLE B2








CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GRAIN ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL


STEEL
SHEET(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)




















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W























A1
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07








A2
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07

0.004






B1
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07
<0.001







B2
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07
<0.001
0.006






C1
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20








C2
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.001






C3
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.003






C4
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.003






C5
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.007






C6
0.002
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.018






C7
0.004
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.028






C8
0.006
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.048






D1
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.001






D2
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.007






D3
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

<0.001 






E
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03


0.006





F
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03



0.015




G
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.004


0.005



H
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03




0.010



I
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03





0.015


J
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.008

0.008




K
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.001
0.003

0.003



L
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03


0.004

0.003










The grain oriented electrical steel sheets were produced under production conditions shown in Table B3 to Table B7. The production conditions other than those shown in the tables were the same as those in the above Example 1.










TABLE B3








PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





2001
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2002
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2003
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2004
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2005
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2006
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2007
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2008
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2009
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2010
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2011
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2012
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2013
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2014
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2015
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2016
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2017
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2018
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2019
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2020
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN






PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT












CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE2
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE






2001
C1
22
220
0.05
0.001
720
180
300



2002
C1
22
250
0.05
0.001
720
180
300



2003
C1
22
300
0.05
0.001
720
180
300



2004
C1
22
160
0.05
0.002
720
420
300



2005
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
720
420
300



2006
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
420
300



2007
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
480
420
300



2008
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
360
420
300



2009
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
240
420
300



2010
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
180
420
300



2011
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
120
420
300



2012
C1
22
220
0.1
0.002
60
420
300



2013
C1
22
220
0.1
0.005
420
420
300



2014
C1
22
220
0.1
0.02
420
420
300



2015
C1
22
220
0.1
0.03
420
420
300



2016
C1
22
220
0.2
0.002
420
420
600



2017
C1
22
220
0.3
0.002
420
420
600



2018
C1
22
220
0.6
0.002
420
420
600



2019
C1
22
220
1
0.002
360
420
600



2020
C1
22
220
0.2
0.05
420
420
600

















TABLE B4








PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





2021
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2022
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2023
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2024
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2025
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2026
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2027
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2028
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2029
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2030
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2031
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2032
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2033
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2034
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2035
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2036
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2037
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2038
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2039
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2040
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN






PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT












CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE2
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE






2021
C1
22
300
2
0.001
360
420
600



2022
C1
22
300
0.03
0.001
360
180
600



2023
C1
22
300
0.15
0.002
360
420
600



2024
D1
23
220
0.03
0.001
420
150
300



2025
D1
23
220
0.03
0.001
420
300
300



2026
D1
23
220
0.2
0.001
420
300
300



2027
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
300
300



2028
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
150
300



2029
D1
23
220
0.2
0.001
420
150
300



2030
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
150
300



2031
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
300
300



2032
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
600
300



2033
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
900
300



2034
D1
23
220
0.2
0.003
420
1500
300



2035
D2
17
210
0.05
0.001
900
150
300



2036
D2
17
210
0.05
0.002
900
90
300



2037
D2
17
210
0.2
0.005
900
90
300



2038
D2
17
210
0.05
0.001
600
90
300



2039
D2
17
210
0.05
0.001
600
150
300



2040
D2
17
210
0.05
0.001
600
300
300

















TABLE B5








PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





2041
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2042
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2043
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2044
D3
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2045
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2046
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2047
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2048
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2049
C1
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2050
C2
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2051
C3
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2052
C4
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2053
C5
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2054
C6
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2055
C7
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2056
C8
1170
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2057
D1
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2058
D2
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2059
E
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2060
F
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN






PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT












CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE2
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
NINUTE






2041
D2
17
180
0.2
0.002
480
300
300



2042
D2
17
150
0.3
0.002
480
300
300



2043
D2
17
210
0.4
0.002
480
300
300



2044
D3
17
210
0.5
0.005
360
600
300



2045
D2
17
210
0.6
0.002
480
300
300



2046
D2
17
180
1
0.002
480
600
300



2047
D2
17
180
2
0.002
480
600
300



2048
D2
17
210
2
0.002
480
600
300



2049
C1
23
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2050
C2
24
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2051
C3
20
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2052
C4
17
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2053
C5
16
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2054
C6
15
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2055
C7
13
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2056
C8
12
210
0.25
0.01
240
150
300



2057
D1
24
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2058
D2
17
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2059
E
22
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2060
F
19
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300

















TABLE B6








PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





2061
G
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2062
H
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2063
I
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2064
J
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2065
K
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2066
L
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26
90.7


2067
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2068
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2069
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2070
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2071
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2072
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2073
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2074
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2075
A1
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2076
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2077
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2078
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2079
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2080
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN






PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT












CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE2
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE






2061
G
15
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2062
H
15
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2063
I
23
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2064
J
17
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2065
K
17
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2066
L
15
230
0.3
0.004
360
150
300



2067
A1
9

0.2
0.001
300
150
300



2068
A1
9

0.2
0.001
300
150
300



2069
A1
9

0.2
0.001
300
300
300



2070
A1
9

0.2
0.001
300
300
300



2071
A1
9

0.5
0.005
300
300
300



2072
A1
9

0.5
0.01
300
900
300



2073
A1
9

0.2
0.04
300
300
300



2074
A1
9

0.2
0.002
300
900
300



2075
A1
9

0.05
0.002
300
900
300



2076
A2
7

0.2
0.001
300
150
300



2077
A2
7

0.2
0.001
300
150
300



2078
A2
7

0.2
0.001
300
150
300



2079
A2
7

0.2
0.001
300
300
300



2080
A2
7

0.5
0.005
300
300
300

















TABLE B7








PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING













TEMPER-

HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING















HEATING
ATURE
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
REDUCTION


















TEMPER-
OF FINAL
TEMPER-
THICK-
TEMPER-

THICK-
OF COLD



STEEL
ATURE
ROLLING
ATURE
NESS
ATURE
TIME
NESS
ROLLING


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm
%





2081
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2082
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2083
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2084
A2
1350
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2085
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2086
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2087
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2088
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2089
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2090
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2091
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2092
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2093
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2094
B1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2095
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2096
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2097
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2098
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2099
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2100
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2101
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2102
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2103
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0


2104
B2
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26
90.0












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION ANNEALING
















GRAIN







SIZE OF
NITROGEN






PRIMARY RE-
CONTENT












CRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING


















STEEL
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE2
TF



No.
TYPE
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE






2081
A2
7

0.5
0.01
300
600
300



2082
A2
7

0.2
0.04
300
300
300



2083
A2
7

0.2
0.002
300
600
300



2084
A2
7

0.05
0.002
300
900
300



2085
B1
10

0.1
0.015
150
300
300



2086
B1
10

0.1
0.05
150
600
300



2087
B1
10

1
0.05
150
300
300



2088
B1
10

1
0.015
150
300
300



2089
B1
10

0.4
0.04
150
900
300



2090
B1
10

0.01
0.015
150
900
300



2091
B1
10

2
0.015
150
90
300



2092
B1
10

2
0.25
150
900
300



2093
B1
10

0.03
0.015
150
150
300



2094
B1
10

2
0.015
150
150
300



2095
B2
8

0.1
0.015
150
300
300



2096
B2
8

0.1
0.05
150
600
300



2097
B2
8

2
0.05
150
300
300



2098
B2
8

2
0.015
150
300
300



2099
B2
8

0.4
0.04
150
900
300



2100
B2
8

0.01
0.015
150
900
300



2101
B2
8

2
0.015
150
90
300



2102
B2
8

2
0.25
150
900
300



2103
B2
8

0.02
0.015
150
150
300



2104
B2
8

2
0.015
150
150
300









The insulation coating which was the same as those in the above Example 1 was formed on the surface of produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets (final annealed sheets).


The produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets had the intermediate layer which was arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet) and the insulation coating which was arranged in contact with the intermediate layer, when viewing the cross section whose cutting direction is parallel to thickness direction. The intermediate layer was forsterite film whose average thickness was 1.5 μm, and the insulation coating was the coating which mainly included phosphate and colloidal silica and whose average thickness was 2 μm.


Various characteristics of the obtained grain oriented electrical steel sheet were evaluated. The evaluation methods were the same as those in the above Example 1. The evaluation results are shown in Table B8 to Table B12.












TABLE B8








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBC
RAC
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBC/RAC
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















2001
C1
NONE
0.87
24.9
28.8
4.57
1.911
0.879
0.891
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2002
C1
NONE
0.87
29.8
34.1
4.34
1.917
0.878
0.875
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2003
C1
NONE
0.86
34.8
40.3
4.15
1.924
0.870
0.859
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2004
C1
NONE
0.92
22.1
24.1
4.70
1.904
0.665
0.899
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2005
C1
NONE
0.93
28.3
30.3
4.39
1.916
0.647
0.877
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2006
C1
EXISTENCE
1.12
24.4
21.7
3.20
1.918
0.444
0.870
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2007
C1
EXISTENCE
1.16
24.1
20.8
3.19
1.920
0.426
0.870
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2008
C1
EXISTENCE
1.22
23.3
19.1
3.15
1.919
0.414
0.871
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2009
C1
EXISTENCE
1.21
22.8
18.9
3.16
1.920
0.413
0.870
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2010
C1
EXISTENCE
1.17
24.0
20.6
3.18
1.921
0.428
0.871
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2011
C1
EXISTENCE
1.13
23.7
20.9
3.22
1.918
0.449
0.872
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2012
C1
NONE
0.93
28.7
30.8
4.37
1.916
0.647
0.877
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2013
C1
EXISTENCE
1.24
23.8
19.2
3.02
1.923
0.397
0.863
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2014
C1
EXISTENCE
1.24
24.1
19.3
3.00
1.924
0.399
0.863
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2015
C1
EXISTENCE
1.17
24.1
20.7
3.18
1.919
0.428
0.871
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2016
C1
EXISTENCE
1.18
24.8
21.0
3.19
1.925
0.388
0.872
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2017
C1
EXISTENCE
1.23
25.3
20.6
3.03
1.928
0.363
0.863
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2018
C1
EXISTENCE
1.24
23.6
19.1
3.04
1.928
0.365
0.864
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2019
C1
EXISTENCE
1.19
23.0
19.3
3.18
1.925
0.373
0.868
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2020
C1
NONE
1.00
25.3
25.4
4.38
1.916
0.547
0.879
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE B9








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBC
RAC
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBC/RAC
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















2021
C1
NONE
0.97
33.6
34.7
4.05
1.933
0.519
0.853
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2022
C1
NONE
0.98
32.5
33.0
4.10
1.931
0.522
0.859
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2023
C1
EXISTENCE
1.19
32.6
27.3
2.52
1.940
0.361
0.840
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2024
D1
NONE
0.96
24.5
25.5
4.51
1.905
0.612
0.868
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2025
D1
NONE
0.98
25.6
26.0
4.48
1.908
0.605
0.863
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2026
D1
NONE
0.98
25.0
25.5
4.40
1.910
0.587
0.858
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2027
D1
EXISTENCE
1.17
23.6
20.1
3.18
1.913
0.474
0.852
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2028
D1
NONE
0.98
26.2
26.8
4.42
1.911
0.588
0.860
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2029
D1
NONE
0.98
24.5
25.1
4.45
1.909
0.601
0.863
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2030
D1
NONE
1.00
26.6
26.6
4.40
1.910
0.586
0.859
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2031
D1
EXISTENCE
1.16
24.3
20.9
3.17
1.915
0.472
0.851
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2032
D1
EXISTENCE
1.25
25.1
20.2
3.02
1.918
0.442
0.842
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2033
D1
EXISTENCE
1.24
23.9
19.3
3.04
1.917
0.441
0.843
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2034
D1
EXISTENCE
1.16
21.9
18.8
3.15
1.915
0.471
0.851
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2035
D2
NONE
0.89
27.1
30.5
3.99
1.931
0.720
0.849
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2036
D2
NONE
0.98
23.5
23.9
3.98
1.934
0.533
0.847
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2037
D2
NONE
0.98
24.6
25.1
3.95
1.935
0.514
0.847
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2038
D2
NONE
1.01
23.8
23.5
3.98
1.935
0.505
0.848
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2039
D2
NONE
1.00
22.9
22.7
3.96
1.933
0.501
0.846
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2040
D2
NONE
0.99
23.8
24.0
3.99
1.935
0.504
0.847
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE B10








PRODUCTION RESULTS











BOUNDARY



EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBC
RAC
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBC/RAC
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















2041
D2
EXISTENCE
1.41
23.8
16.8
2.38
1.941
0.318
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2042
D2
EXISTENCE
1.48
25.6
17.2
2.42
1.940
0.309
0.833
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2043
D2
EXISTENCE
1.49
24.5
16.4
2.00
1.952
0.300
0.814
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2044
D3
EXISTENCE
1.85
24.5
13.2
1.70
1.957
0.252
0.800
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2045
D2
EXISTENCE
1.48
25.2
17.1
1.96
1.951
0.301
0.813
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2046
D2
EXISTENCE
1.47
23.8
16.2
2.25
1.946
0.310
0.824
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2047
D2
EXISTENCE
1.33
23.7
17.8
2.39
1.941
0.337
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2048
D2
EXISTENCE
1.34
23.8
17.7
2.17
1.947
0.331
0.821
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2049
C1
NONE
1.00
11.8
11.7
4.31
1.918
0.539
0.872
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2050
C2
NONE
0.99
11.8
11.9
4.32
1.917
0.537
0.873
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2051
C3
EXISTENCE
1.40
25.1
18.0
2.48
1.931
0.400
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2052
C4
EXISTENCE
1.45
24.0
16.6
2.11
1.946
0.334
0.809
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2053
C5
EXISTENCE
1.44
24.3
16.9
2.12
1.944
0.332
0.810
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2054
C6
EXISTENCE
1.44
24.6
17.0
2.09
1.945
0.334
0.809
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2055
C7
EXISTENCE
1.39
25.4
18.2
2.48
1.930
0.398
0.842
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2056
C8
NONE
1.00
13.4
13.4
4.30
1.925
0.489
0.882
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2057
D1
NONE
1.00
12.0
12.1
4.33
1.919
0.536
0.884
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2058
D2
EXISTENCE
1.44
24.7
17.1
2.10
1.947
0.313
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2059
E
EXISTENCE
1.38
24.3
17.7
2.50
1.926
0.440
0.848
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2060
F
EXISTENCE
1.43
23.6
16.5
2.13
1.942
0.365
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


















TABLE B11








PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF













SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBC
RAC
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBC/RAC
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















2061
G
EXISTENCE
1.44
25.1
17.5
2.12
1.949
0.311
0.829
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2062
H
EXISTENCE
1.43
24.4
17.1
2.10
1.947
0.310
0.829
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2063
I
EXISTENCE
1.37
24.6
18.0
2.46
1.921
0.483
0.848
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2064
J
EXISTENCE
1.45
23.5
16.3
2.13
1.948
0.312
0.828
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2065
K
EXISTENCE
1.43
24.2
17.0
2.11
1.948
0.311
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2066
L
EXISTENCE
1.44
25.1
17.5
2.13
1.949
0.309
0.831
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2067
A1
NONE
0.99
10.7
10.8
4.29
1.924
0.534
0.878
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2068
A1
NONE
0.99
12.1
12.2
4.29
1.923
0.533
0.879
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2069
A1
NONE
1.00
13.1
13.1
4.21
1.926
0.516
0.876
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2070
A1
NONE
0.99
11.5
11.6
4.22
1.926
0.520
0.876
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2071
A1
EXISTENCE
1.39
41.7
30.0
2.54
1.937
0.330
0.852
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2072
A1
EXISTENCE
1.58
54.8
34.6
2.39
1.941
0.296
0.842
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2073
A1
NONE
1.00
11.5
11.5
4.22
1.926
0.518
0.873
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2074
A1
EXISTENCE
1.31
35.7
27.2
2.72
1.933
0.351
0.857
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2075
A1
NONE
1.05
17.0
16.3
4.13
1.928
0.464
0.869
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2076
A2
EXISTENCE
1.26
25.2
20.0
2.11
1.948
0.346
0.828
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2077
A2
EXISTENCE
1.26
23.7
18.8
2.11
1.947
0.350
0.828
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2078
A2
EXISTENCE
1.26
25.1
19.8
2.10
1.948
0.347
0.828
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2079
A2
EXISTENCE
1.26
24.7
19.6
1.99
1.952
0.345
0.823
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2080
A2
EXISTENCE
1.70
25.9
15.2
1.50
1.963
0.261
0.799
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE



















TABLE B12









PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBC
RAC
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBC/RAc
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















2081
A2
EXISTENCE
1.82
24.5
13.5
1.38
1.965
0.245
0.796
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2082
A2
EXISTENCE
1.26
23.9
19.0
2.00
1.951
0.341
0.823
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2083
A2
EXISTENCE
1.51
24.8
16.4
1.72
1.957
0.289
0.811
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2084
A2
EXISTENCE
1.35
24.3
18.1
1.86
1.954
0.321
0.817
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2085
B1
EXISTENCE
1.18
26.0
22.1
2.75
1.932
0.389
0.861
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2086
B1
NONE
1.00
11.8
11.8
4.14
1.927
0.517
0.868
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2087
B1
NONE
0.97
11.3
11.6
4.19
1.924
0.524
0.874
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2088
B1
EXISTENCE
1.20
26.8
22.3
2.78
1.932
0.384
0.859
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2089
B1
NONE
1.01
13.3
13.2
4.06
1.931
0.508
0.862
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2090
B1
NONE
1.06
19.0
17.9
4.05
1.933
0.443
0.860
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2091
B1
NONE
0.97
11.6
12.0
4.22
1.926
0.539
0.873
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2092
B1
NONE
0.99
10.0
10.1
4.20
1.926
0.542
0.872
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2093
B1
NONE
0.99
10.8
11.0
4.19
1.926
0.538
0.873
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2094
B1
NONE
0.98
11.2
11.4
4.21
1.927
0.536
0.872
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2095
B2
EXISTENCE
1.45
23.7
16.3
1.70
1.957
0.301
0.811
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2096
B2
EXISTENCE
1.28
24.7
19.3
1.88
1.954
0.339
0.819
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2097
B2
NONE
0.99
23.7
23.8
3.79
1.940
0.495
0.843
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2098
B2
EXISTENCE
1.34
24.3
18.1
1.83
1.954
0.321
0.816
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2099
B2
EXISTENCE
1.29
24.3
18.8
1.77
1.957
0.336
0.814
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2100
B2
EXISTENCE
1.38
23.7
17.2
1.75
1.958
0.316
0.812
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2101
B2
NONE
1.09
22.9
21.0
3.77
1.942
0.435
0.842
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2102
B2
NONE
1.00
23.9
23.9
3.79
1.942
0.493
0.843
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


2103
B2
EXISTENCE
1.33
24.3
18.3
1.94
1.950
0.331
0.823
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


2104
B2
EXISTENCE
1.34
24.2
18.0
1.84
1.956
0.322
0.815
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE









Hereinafter, as with the above Example 1, the evaluation results of characteristics are explained by classifying the grain oriented electrical steels under some features in regard to the chemical compositions and the producing methods.


(Examples Produced by Low Temperature Slab Heating Process)


Nos. 2001 to 2066 were examples produced by a process in which slab heating temperature was decreased, nitridation was conducted after primary recrystallization, and thereby main inhibitor for secondary recrystallization was formed.


(Examples of Nos. 2001 to 2023)


Nos. 2001 to 2023 were examples in which the steel type without Nb was used and the conditions of PA, PB, TD, and TE2 were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 2001 to 2023, when λp-p @1.9 T was 0.510 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 2001 to 2023, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Here, No. 2003 was the comparative example in which the inhibitor intensity was increased by controlling the N content after nitridation to be 300 ppm. In No. 2003, although B8 was a high value, the conditions in final annealing were not preferable, and thus λp-p@1.9 T was insufficient. In other words, in No. 2003, the switching did not occur during final annealing, and as a result, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was not improved. On the other hand, No. 2006 was the inventive example in which the N content after nitridation was controlled to be 220 ppm. In No. 2006, although B8 was not a particularly high value, the conditions in final annealing were preferable, and thus λp-p @1.9 T became a preferred low value. In other words, in No. 2006, the switching occurred during final annealing, and as a result, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved.


Nos. 2017 to 2023 were examples in which the secondary recrystallization was maintained up to higher temperature by increasing TF. In Nos. 2017 to 2023, B8 increased. However, in Nos. 2020 to 2022 among the above, the conditions in final annealing were not preferable, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was not improved as with No. 2003.


(Examples of Nos. 2024 to 2034)


Nos. 2024 to 2034 were examples in which the steel type including 0.001% of Nb as the slab was used and the conditions of PA, PB, and TE2 were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 2024 to 2034, when λp-p @1.9 T was 0.580 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 2024 to 2034, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


(Examples of Nos. 2035 to 2048)


Nos. 2035 to 2048 were examples in which the steel type including 0.009% of Nb as the slab was used and the conditions of PA, PB, TD, and TE2 were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 2035 to 2048, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.500 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 2035 to 2048, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Here, in Nos. 2035 to 2048, the Nb content of the slab was 0.009%, Nb was purified during final annealing, and then the Nb content of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (final annealed sheet) was 0.007% or less. Nos. 2035 to 2048 included the preferred amount of Nb as the slab as compared with the above Nos. 2001 to 2034, and thus λp-p@1.9 T became a preferred low value. Moreover, B8 increased. As described above, when the slab including Nb was used and the conditions in final annealing were controlled, B8 and λp-p @1.9 T were favorably affected. In particular, No. 2044 was the inventive example in which the purification was elaborately performed in final annealing and the Nb content of the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (final annealed sheet) became less than detection limit. In No. 2044, although it was difficult to confirm that Nb group element was utilized from the grain oriented electrical steel sheet as the final product, the above effects were clearly obtained.


(Examples of Nos. 2049 to 2056)


Nos. 2049 to 2056 were examples in which TE2 was controlled to be a short time of less than 300 minutes and the influence of Nb content was particularly confirmed.


In Nos. 2049 to 2056, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.480 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 2049 to 2056, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


As shown in Nos. 2049 to 2056, as long as 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % of Nb was included in the slab, the switching occurred during final annealing, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even when TE2 was the short time.


(Examples of Nos. 2057 to 2066)


Nos. 2057 to 2066 were examples in which TE2 was controlled to be the short time of less than 300 minutes and the influence of the amount of Nb group element was confirmed.


In Nos. 2057 to 2066, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.530 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 2057 to 2066, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


As shown in Nos. 2057 to 2066, as long as the predetermined amount of Nb group element except for Nb was included in the slab, the switching occurred during final annealing, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even when TE2 was the short time.


(Examples Produced by High Temperature Slab Heating Process)


Nos. 2067 to 2104 were examples produced by a process in which slab heating temperature was increased, MnS was sufficiently soluted during slab heating and was reprecipited during post process, and the reprecipited MnS was utilized as main inhibitor.


In Nos. 2067 to 2104, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.430 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 2067 to 2104, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


Nos. 2085 to 2104 in the above Nos. 2067 to 2104 were examples in which Bi was included in the slab and thus B8 increased.


As shown in Nos. 2067 to 2104, as long as the conditions in final annealing were appropriately controlled, the switching occurred during final annealing, and thus the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even by the high temperature slab heating process. Moreover, as with the low temperature slab heating process, when the slab including Nb was used and the conditions in final annealing were controlled, B8 and λp-p@1.9 T were favorably affected by the high temperature slab heating process.


Example 3

Using slabs with chemical composition shown in Table C1 as materials, grain oriented electrical steel sheets with chemical composition shown in Table C2 were produced. The methods for measuring the chemical composition and the notation in the tables are the same as in the above Example 1.










TABLE C1







STEEL
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SLAB(STEEL PIECE) (UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)




















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W























A
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.025
0.026
0.008
0.07








B1
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03








B2
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03

0.001






B3
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03

0.003






B4
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03

0.007






B5
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03

0.010






B6
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03

0.020






B7
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
<0.03

0.030






C
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
0.20

0.002






D
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20

0.005






E
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20


0.007





F
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20



0.020




G
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20

0.005


0.003



H
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20




0.010



I
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20





0.010


J
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20

0.004

0.010




K
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20

0.005
0.003

0.003



L
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.027
0.008
0.20


0.005

0.005


















TABLE C2








CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GRAIN ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL


STEEL
SHEET(UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)




















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W























A
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07








B1
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03








B2
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

<0.001 






B3
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.002






B4
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.006






B5
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.007






B6
0.002
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.018






B7
0.004
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.028






C
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.002






D
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.004






E
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20


0.006





F
10.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20



0.020




G
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.004


0.001



H
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20




0.010



I
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20





0.010


J
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.003
0.001
0.003




K
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.003
0.001

0.002



L
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20


0.003

0.004










The grain oriented electrical steel sheets were produced under production conditions shown in Table C3 to Table C6. In the final annealing, in order to control the anisotropy of the switching direction, the annealing was conducted with a thermal gradient in the transverse direction of steel sheet. The production conditions other than the thermal gradient and other than those shown in the tables were the same as those in the above Example 1.











TABLE C3









PRODUCTION CONDITION











HOT ROLLING

COLD

















TEMPERATURE


HOT BAND
ROLLING




HEATING
OF FINAL
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
















STEEL
TEMPERATURE
ROLLING
TEMPERATURE
THICKNESS
TEMPERATURE
TIME
THICKNESS


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm





3001
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3002
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3003
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3004
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3005
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3006
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3007
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3008
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3009
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3010
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3011
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3012
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3013
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3014
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3015
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3016
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3017
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3018
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3019
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3020
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26












PRODUCTION CONDITION
















DECARBURIZATION







ANNEALING












COLD ROLLING
GRAIN SIZE
NITROGEN




REDUCTION
OF PRIMARY
CONTENT
FINAL ANNEALING



















OF COLD
RECRYSTALLIZED
AFTER



THERMAL




STEEL
ROLLING
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
GRADIENT



No.
TYPE
%
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
° C./cm







3001
B1
90.7
24
220
0.020
0.001
720
0.5



3002
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.001
600
0.5



3003
B1
90.7
24
220
0.020
0.002
600
0.5



3004
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
720
0.5



3005
B1
90.7
24
220
1.000
0.030
60
0.5



3006
B1
90.7
24
220
1.000
0.050
120
0.5



3007
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
60
0.5



3008
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.5



3009
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
480
0.5



3010
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
0.5



3011
B1
90.7
24
220
1.000
0.030
120
0.5



3012
B1
90.7
24
220
2.000
0.030
120
0.5



3013
B1
90.7
24
250
0.100
0.001
600
3.0



3014
B1
90.7
24
300
0.020
0.002
600
3.0



3015
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
720
3.0



3016
B1
90.7
24
220
1.000
0.030
60
3.0



3017
B1
90.7
24
220
1.000
0.050
120
3.0



3018
B1
90.7
24
220
2.000
0.001
120
3.0



3019
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
60
3.0



3020
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
600
3.0



















TABLE C4









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING












TEMPERATURE

COLD ROLLING














HEATING
OF FINAL
COILING
SHEET
HOT BAND ANNEALING
SHEET
















STEEL
TEMPERATURE
ROLLING
TEMPERATURE
THICKNESS
TEMPERATURE
TIME
THICKNESS


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm





3021
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3022
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3023
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3024
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3025
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3026
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3027
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3028
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3029
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3030
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3031
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3032
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3033
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3034
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3035
B1
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3036
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3037
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3038
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3039
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3040
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION




ANNEALING













COLD ROLLING
GRAIN SIZE
NITROGEN




REDUCTION
OF PRIMARY
CONTENT
FINAL ANNEALING



















OF COLD
RECRYSTALLIZED
AFTER



THERMAL




STEEL
ROLLING
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
GRADIENT



No.
TYPE
%
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
° C./cm







3021
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
480
3.0



3022
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
3.0



3023
B1
90.7
24
220
1.000
0.030
120
3.0



3024
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.3



3025
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.5



3026
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.7



3027
B1
90.7
24
220
0.100
0.002
600
1.0



3028
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
0.3



3029
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
0.5



3030
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
0.7



3031
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
1.0



3032
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
2.0



3033
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
3.0



3034
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
5.0



3035
B1
90.7
24
220
0.500
0.010
300
7.0



3036
B4
90.7
16
250
0.100
0.001
600
0.5



3037
B4
90.7
16
220
0.100
0.002
720
3.0



3038
B4
90.7
16
220
1.000
0.030
60
3.0



3039
B4
90.7
16
250
0.100
0.001
600
3.0



3040
B4
90.7
16
300
0.020
0.002
600
3.0



















TABLE C5









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING












TEMPERATURE

COLD ROLLING














HEATING
OF FINAL
COILING
SHEET
HOT BAND ANNEALING
SHEET
















STEEL
TEMPERATURE
ROLLING
TEMPERATURE
THICKNESS
TEMPERATURE
TIME
THICKNESS


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm





3041
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3042
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3043
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3044
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3045
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3046
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3047
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3048
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3049
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3050
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3051
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3052
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3053
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3054
B4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3055
B2
1200
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3056
B3
1200
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3057
B4
1200
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3058
B5
1200
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3059
B6
1200
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3060
B7
1200
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION




ANNEALING













COLD ROLLING
GRAIN SIZE
NITROGEN




REDUCTION
OF PRIMARY
CONTENT
FINAL ANNEALING



















OF COLD
RECRYSTALLIZED
AFTER



THERMAL




STEEL
ROLLING
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
GRADIENT



No.
TYPE
%
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
° C./cm







3041
B4
90.7
16
220
1.000
0.050
120
3.0



3042
B4
90.7
16
220
0.100
0.002
600
3.0



3043
B4
90.7
16
220
0.500
0.010
480
3.0



3044
B4
90.7
16
220
0.500
0.010
300
3.0



3045
B4
90.7
16
220
0.700
0.030
120
3.0



3046
B4
90.7
16
220
1.000
0.030
120
3.0



3047
B4
90.7
16
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.3



3048
B4
90.7
16
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.5



3049
B4
90.7
16
220
0.100
0.002
600
0.7



3050
B4
90.7
16
220
0.100
0.002
600
1.0



3051
B4
90.7
16
220
0.500
0.010
300
2.0



3052
B4
90.7
16
220
0.500
0.010
300
3.0



3053
B4
90.7
16
220
0.500
0.010
300
5.0



3054
B4
90.7
16
220
0.500
0.010
300
7.0



3055
B2
90.7
24
210
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3056
B3
90.7
20
210
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3057
B4
90.7
17
210
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3058
B5
90.7
16
210
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3059
B6
90.7
15
210
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3060
B7
90.7
13
210
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



















TABLE C6









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING












TEMPERATURE

COLD ROLLING














HEATING
OF FINAL
COILING
SHEET
HOT BAND ANNEALING
SHEET
















STEEL
TEMPERATURE
ROLLING
TEMPERATURE
THICKNESS
TEMPERATURE
TIME
THICKNESS


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm





3061
C
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3062
D
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3063
E
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3064
F
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3065
G
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3066
H
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3067
I
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3068
J
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3069
K
1100
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


3070
L
1100
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26


3071
A
1400
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION




ANNEALING













COLD ROLLING
GRAIN SIZE
NITROGEN




REDUCTION
OF PRIMARY
CONTENT
FINAL ANNEALING



















OF COLD
RECRYSTALLIZED
AFTER



THERMAL




STEEL
ROLLING
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
GRADIENT



No.
TYPE
%
μm
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
° C./cm







3061
C
90.7
24
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3062
D
90.7
17
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3063
E
90.7
22
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3064
F
90.7
19
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3065
G
90.7
15
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3066
H
90.7
15
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3067
I
90.7
23
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3068
J
90.7
17
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3069
K
90.7
15
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3070
L
90.0
15
220
0.400
0.010
360
3.0



3071
A
90.7
9

0.400
0.010
360
3.0










The insulation coating which was the same as those in the above Example 1 was formed on the surface of produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets (final annealed sheets).


The produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets had the intermediate layer which was arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet) and the insulation coating which was arranged in contact with the intermediate layer, when viewing the cross section whose cutting direction is parallel to thickness direction. The intermediate layer was forsterite film whose average thickness was 3 μm, and the insulation coating was the coating which mainly included phosphate and colloidal silica and whose average thickness was 3 μm.


Various characteristics of the obtained grain oriented electrical steel sheet were evaluated. The evaluation methods were the same as those in the above Example 1. The evaluation results are shown in Table C7 to Table C10.


In most grain oriented electrical steel sheets, the grains stretched in the direction of the thermal gradient, and the grain size of γ subgrain also increased in the direction. In other words, the grains stretched in the transverse direction. However, in some grain oriented electrical steel sheets produced under conditions such that the thermal gradient was small, γ subgrain had the grain size in which the size in transverse direction was smaller than that in rolling direction. When the grain size in transverse direction was smaller than that in rolling direction, the steel sheet was shown as “*” in the column “inconsistence as to thermal gradient direction” in Tables.











TABLE C7









PRODUCTION RESULTS









BOUNDARY










EXISTENCE OF
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE




















SWITCHING








INCONSISISTENCE




BOUNDARY








AS TO THERMAL



STEEL
EXISTENCE
RAC
RBC
RAL
RBL




GRADIENT


No.
TYPE
NONE
mm
mm
mm
mm
RACz/RAL
RBL/RAL
RBC/RAC
RBC/RBL
DIRECTION





3001
B1
NONE
28.3
27.0
27.1
24.0
1.05
0.88
0.95
1.13


3002
B1
NONE
27.6
27.2
26.9
26.9
1.03
1.00
0.99
1.01


3003
B1
NONE
26.5
26.3
27.1
28.0
0.98
1.03
0.99
0.94
*


3004
B1
NONE
30.8
29.5
28.7
26.7
1.07
0.93
0.96
1.11


3005
B1
NONE
30.8
29.2
30.4
27.9
1.01
0.92
0.95
1.05


3006
B1
NONE
27.6
26.9
27.9
27.7
0.99
0.99
0.98
0.97
*


3007
B1
NONE
30.8
29.6
28.9
27.0
1.07
0.93
0.96
1.10


3008
B1
EXISTENCE
25.2
25.5
27.9
31.3
0.91
1.12
1.01
0.81
*


3009
B1
EXISTENCE
25.0
25.9
27.7
37.2
0.90
1.34
1.04
0.69
*


3010
B1
EXISTENCE
24.8
34.9
28.4
39.8
0.87
1.40
1.41
0.88
*


3011
B1
EXISTENCE
25.2
25.5
27.3
30.8
0.92
1.13
1.01
0.83
*


3012
B1
NONE
26.5
25.9
27.3
27.8
0.97
1.02
0.98
0.93
*


3013
B1
NONE
66.7
64.4
33.0
32.5
2.02
0.98
0.97
1.99


3014
B1
NONE
115.9
112.1
38.3
38.8
3.03
1.01
0.97
2.89


3015
B1
NONE
44.3
42.5
28.8
26.8
1.54
0.93
0.96
1.59


3016
B1
NONE
44.3
41.9
30.2
27.6
1.47
0.92
0.95
1.52


3017
B1
NONE
45.3
43.8
28.6
28.0
1.58
0.98
0.97
1.56


3018
B1
NONE
46.5
45.9
27.2
28.0
1.71
1.03
0.99
1.64


3019
B1
NONE
44.3
42.2
29.1
26.9
1.52
0.92
0.95
1.57


3020
B1
EXISTENCE
27.0
146.4
13.3
41.6
2.02
3.12
5.42
3.52













EVALUATION RESULTS












PRODUCTION RESULTS
MAGNETIC












DEVIATION
CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50




No.
TYPE
(RBC/RAL) /(RBL/RAC)
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE







3001
B1
1.08
4.49
1.912
0.882
0.891
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3002
B1
0.99
4.33
1.919
0.550
0.879
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3003
B1
0.96
4.30
1.918
0.511
0.877
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3004
B1
1.03
4.26
1.919
0.645
0.877
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3005
B1
1.03
4.29
1.921
0.646
0.876
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3006
B1
0.99
4.31
1.919
0.549
0.877
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3007
B1
1.03
4.28
1.920
0.645
0.876
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3008
B1
0.90
3.05
1.921
0.442
0.871
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3009
B1
0.77
2.76
1.929
0.369
0.857
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3010
B1
1.00
2.74
1.931
0.354
0.853
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3011
B1
0.90
3.08
1.923
0.446
0.871
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3012
B1
0.96
4.33
1.918
0.512
0.878
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3013
B1
0.98
4.14
1.925
0.543
0.865
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3014
B1
0.95
3.92
1.934
0.496
0.847
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3015
B1
1.03
4.27
1.921
0.647
0.877
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3016
B1
1.03
4.29
1.919
0.645
0.875
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3017
B1
0.99
4.34
1.919
0.550
0.878
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3018
B1
0.96
4.29
1.919
0.509
0.877
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3019
B1
1.03
4.28
1.920
0.646
0.877
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



1020
B1
1.74
2.55
1.934
0.236
0.848
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



















TABLE C8









PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE




















SWITCHING








INCONSISTENCE




BOUNDARY








AS TO THERMAL



STEEL
EXISTENCE
RAC
RBC
RAL
RBL




GRADIENT


No.
TYPE
NONE
mm
mm
mm
mm
RAC/RAL
RBL/RAL
RBC/RAC
RBC/RBL
DIRECTION





3021
B1
EXISTENCE
28.2
163.7
13.5
44.0
2.10
3.27
5.80
3.72


3022
B1
EXISTENCE
28.7
169.8
13.6
45.1
2.10
3.31
5.93
3.76


3023
B1
EXISTENCE
27.0
146.0
13.3
41.4
2.03
3.11
5.41
3.52


3024
B1
EXISTENCE
25.2
25.9
27.2
31.0
0.93
1.14
1.03
0.84
*


3025
B1
EXISTENCE
25.2
25.6
27.2
30.7
0.93
1.13
1.01
0.83
*


3026
B1
EXISTENCE
18.3
54.6
14.7
21.3
1.24
1.45
2.99
2.56


3027
B1
EXISTENCE
18.9
59.8
15.8
25.1
1.20
1.59
3.16
2.38


3028
B1
EXISTENCE
24.8
34.9
27.4
38.5
0.91
1.40
1.41
0.91
*


3029
B1
EXISTENCE
24.8
34.7
27.6
38.4
0.90
1.39
1.40
0.90
*


3030
B1
EXISTENCE
19.5
64.5
14.9
24.2
1.30
1.62
3.31
2.66


3031
B1
EXISTENCE
20.2
70.4
15.3
27.0
1.32
1.76
3.49
2.60


3032
B1
EXISTENCE
23.4
102.0
14.5
34.8
1.61
2.40
4.36
2.94


3033
B1
EXISTENCE
28.7
170.0
13.4
44.4
2.14
3.32
5.93
3.83


3034
B1
EXISTENCE
54.8
267.2
11.8
75.9
4.62
6.41
4.88
3.52


3035
B1
EXISTENCE
181.0
348.5
10.8
136.0
16.84
12.65
1.93
2.56


3036
B4
EXISTENCE
36.0
37.8
40.6
51.8
0.89
1.28
1.05
0.73
*


3037
B4
NONE
114.3
111.8
36.3
37.8
3.15
1.04
0.98
2.96


3038
B4
NONE
114.3
113.6
36.3
38.3
3.15
1.06
0.99
2.97


3039
B4
EXISTENCE
27.5
153.5
13.7
43.5
2.01
3.17
5.57
3.53


3040
B4
EXISTENCE
27.6
154.6
13.5
43.0
2.04
3.18
5.60
3.60



















EVALUATION RESULTS






PRODUCTION RESULTS
MAGNETIC











DEVIATION
CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50




No.
TYPE
(RBC/RAL) /(RBL/RAO)
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE







3021
B1
1.78
2.31
1.941
0.227
0.835
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3022
B1
1.79
2.29
1.941
0.226
0.834
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3023
B1
1.74
2.54
1.933
0.237
0.847
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3024
B1
0.90
3.07
1.922
0.441
0.870
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3025
B1
0.90
3.05
1.922
0.443
0.871
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3026
B1
2.06
2.96
1.926
0.354
0.864
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3027
B1
1.98
2.89
1.927
0.332
0.862
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3028
B1
1.00
2.73
1.931
0.357
0.855
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3029
B1
1.00
2.73
1.931
0.355
0.855
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3030
B1
2.04
2.66
1.933
0.320
0.851
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3031
B1
1.98
2.62
1.933
0.306
0.850
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3032
B1
1.82
2.47
1.937
0.259
0.842
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3033
B1
1.79
2.27
1.940
0.222
0.834
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3034
B1
0.76
1.94
1.950
0.172
0.820
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3035
B1
0.15
1.60
1.958
0.136
0.802
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3036
B4
0.82
1.87
1.952
0.367
0.813
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3037
B4
0.94
3.86
1.934
0.475
0.844
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3038
B4
0.94
3.89
1.934
0.477
0.846
COMPARATIVE










EXAMPLE



3039
B4
1.76
1.39
1.963
0.204
0.792
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3040
B4
1.76
1.05
1.971
0.197
0.774
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



















TABLE C9









PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE




















SWITCHING








INCONSISTENCE




BOUNDARY








AS TO THERMAL



STEEL
EXISTENCE
RAC
RBC
RAL
RBL




GRADIENT


No.
TYPE
NONE
mm
mm
mm
mm
RAC/RAL
RBL/RAL
RBC/RAC
RBC/RBL
DIRECTION





3041
B4
EXISTENCE
27.5
153.9
13.1
41.6
2.11
3.18
5.59
3.70


3042
B4
EXISTENCE
27.9
159.1
13.2
42.4
2.12
3.21
5.70
3.76


3043
B4
EXISTENCE
29.4
180.4
13.6
45.7
2.17
3.37
6.14
3.95


3044
B4
EXISTENCE
30.0
189.6
13.6
46.7
2.20
3.43
6.33
4.06


3045
B4
EXISTENCE
27.9
159.2
13.6
43.6
2.06
3.21
5.70
3.65


3046
B4
EXISTENCE
27.6
154.0
13.4
42.2
2.06
3.16
5.58
3.65


3047
B4
EXISTENCE
38.3
55.1
39.9
56.6
0.96
1.42
1.44
0.97
*


3048
B4
EXISTENCE
39.3
58.0
39.7
56.6
0.99
1.42
1.47
1.02
*


3049
B4
EXISTENCE
19.1
61.3
14.8
23.0
1.29
1.55
3.21
2.66


3050
B4
EXISTENCE
19.8
67.0
14.9
25.3
1.32
1.69
3.39
2.65


3051
B4
EXISTENCE
25.2
122.3
14.5
37.7
1.73
2.59
4.86
3.25


3052
B4
EXISTENCE
30.7
202.1
13.1
46.2
2.34
3.53
6.58
4.37


3053
B4
EXISTENCE
58.3
312.7
12.1
80.0
4.84
6.63
5.36
3.91


3054
B4
EXISTENCE
191.9
419.2
10.8
139.7
17.73
12.91
2.18
3.00


3055
B2
EXISTENCE
29.7
185.0
13.5
46.1
2.20
3.42
6.24
4.01


3056
B3
EXISTENCE
30.6
199.5
13.2
46.0
2.32
3.49
6.52
4.33


3057
B4
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.5
13.4
46.9
2.30
3.51
6.56
4.30


3058
B5
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.3
13.3
46.7
2.30
3.50
6.55
4.31


3059
B6
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.5
13.6
47.6
2.26
3.51
6.56
4.23


3060
B7
EXISTENCE
30.6
199.6
13.3
46.5
2.30
3.49
6.52
4.29














PRODUCTION RESULTS
EVALUATION RESULTS












DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50




No.
TYPE
(RBC/RAL) /(RBL/RAC)
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE







3041
B4
1.76
1.68
1.955
0.214
0.805
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3042
B4
1.77
1.61
1.958
0.208
0.801
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3043
B4
1.82
1.35
1.963
0.199
0.789
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3044
B4
1.84
1.34
1.963
0.199
0.786
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3045
B4
1.77
1.59
1.957
0.208
0.802
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3046
B4
1.77
1.69
1.954
0.214
0.804
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3047
B4
1.01
1.93
1.950
0.335
0.817
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3048
B4
1.04
1.91
1.949
0.333
0.815
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3049
B4
2.07
1.89
1.950
0.311
0.815
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3050
B4
2.00
1.84
1.952
0.294
0.811
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3051
B4
1.88
1.37
1.962
0.223
0.789
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3052
B4
1.87
1.22
1.967
0.196
0.783
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3053
B4
0.81
0.93
1.973
0.145
0.767
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3054
B4
0.17
0.58
1.981
0.110
0.752
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3055
B2
1.83
2.16
1.944
0.220
0.827
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3056
B3
1.87
1.57
1.958
0.203
0.798
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3057
B4
1.87
1.21
1.966
0.192
0.783
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3058
B5
1.87
1.24
1.966
0.196
0.783
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3059
B6
1.87
1.24
1.967
0.194
0.784
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3060
B7
1.87
1.58
1.957
0.204
0.798
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



















TABLE C10









PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE




















SWITCHING








INCONSISTENCE




BOUNDARY








AS TO THERMAL



STEEL
EXISTENCE
RAC
RBC
RAL
RBL




GRADIENT


No.
TYPE
NONE
mm
mm
mm
mm
RAC/RAL
RBL/RAL
RBC/RAC
RBC/RBL
DIRECTION





3061
C
EXISTENCE
29.7
185.2
13.2
45.2
2.24
3.42
6.241
4.09


3062
D
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.3
13.6
47.7
2.26
3.50
6.55
4.22


3063
E
EXISTENCE
30.6
200.4
13.1
46.2
2.33
3.52
6.55
4.34


3064
F
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.5
13.4
47.1
2.29
3.51
6.56
4.28


3065
G
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.6
13.6
47.8
2.26
3.51
6.56
4.22


3066
H
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.7
13.6
47.7
2.26
3.52
6.57
4.23


3067
I
EXISTENCE
30.6
200.1
13.6
47.8
2.25
3.51
6.54
4.19


3068
J
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.3
13.6
47.7
2.26
3.50
6.55
4.22


3069
K
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.5
13.6
47.8
2.25
3.51
6.56
4.22


3070
L
EXISTENCE
30.7
201.4
13.6
47.7
2.26
3.50
6.56
4.22


3071
A
EXISTENCE
29.7
185.1
13.6
46.6
2.18
3.42
6.24
3.97














PRODUCTION RESULTS
EVALUATION RESULTS












DEVIATION
MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE
ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50




No.
TYPE
(RBC/RAL) /(RBL/RAC)
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE







3061
C
1.82
2.15
1.943
0.217
0.829
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3062
D
1.87
1.22
1.967
0.192
0.784
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3063
E
1.86
1.56
1.959
0.200
0.798
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3064
F
1.87
1.22
1.966
0.191
0.784
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3065
G
1.87
1.23
1.966
0.192
0.784
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3066
H
1.87
1.22
1.966
0.195
0.783
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3067
I
1.86
1.55
1.958
0.200
0.798
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3068
J
1.87
1.23
1.965
0.193
0.783
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3069
K
1.87
1.20
1.966
0.194
0.782
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3070
L
1.87
1.23
1.965
0.191
0.783
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE



3071
A
1.82
2.45
1.955
0.166
0.806
INVENTIVE










EXAMPLE










Hereinafter, as with the above Example 1, the evaluation results of characteristics are explained by classifying the grain oriented electrical steels under some features in regard to the chemical compositions and the producing methods.


(Examples Produced by Low Temperature Slab Heating Process)


Nos. 3001 to 3070 were examples produced by a process in which slab heating temperature was decreased, nitridation was conducted after primary recrystallization, and thereby main inhibitor for secondary recrystallization was formed.


(Examples of Nos. 3001 to 3035)


Nos. 3001 to 3035 were examples in which the steel type without Nb was used and the conditions of PA, PB, TD, and thermal gradient were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 3001 to 3035, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.470 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 3001 to 3035, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


(Examples of Nos. 3036 to 3070)


Nos. 3036 to 3070 were examples in which the steel type including Nb as the slab was used and the conditions of PA, PB, TD, and thermal gradient were mainly changed during final annealing.


In Nos. 3036 to 3070, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.470 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 3036 to 3070, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


(Example of No. 3071)


No. 3071 was example produced by a process in which slab heating temperature was increased, MnS was sufficiently soluted during slab heating and was reprecipited during post process, and the reprecipited MnS was utilized as main inhibitor.


In No. 3071, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.470 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


As shown in No. 3071, as long as the conditions in final annealing were appropriately controlled, the magnetostriction in high magnetic field was improved even by the high temperature slab heating process.


Example 4

Using slabs with chemical composition shown in Table D1 as materials, grain oriented electrical steel sheets with chemical composition shown in Table D2 were produced. The methods for measuring the chemical composition and the notation in the tables are the same as in the above Example 1.










TABLE D1







STEEL
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SLAB(STEEL PIECE) (UNIT: mass %, BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)





















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo
Ta
W
OTHER
























X1
0.070
3.26
0.07
0.005
0.026
0.008
0.07

0.001




Se: 0.017


X2
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20






B: 0.002


X3
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20






P: 0.01


X4
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20






Ti: 0.005


X5
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20






Sn: 0.05


X6
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20






Sb: 0.03


X7
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20









X8
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20






Ni: 0.05


X9
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20








X10
0.060
3.35
0.10
0.006
0.028
0.008
<0.03

0.001






X11
0.060
3.45
0.10
0.006
0.026
0.008
0.20

0.010






















TABLE D2








CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GRAIN ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET(UNIT: mass %,


STEEL
BALANCE CONSISTING OF Fe AND IMPURITIES)





















TYPE
C
Si
Mn
S
Al
N
Cu
Bi
Nb
V
Mo

W
OTHER
























X1
0.001
3.15
0.07
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.07






Se: <0.002


X2
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






B: 0.002


X3
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






P: 0.01


X4
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






Ti: 0.005


X5
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






Sn: 0.05


X6
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






Sb: 0.03


X7
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






Cr: 0.1


X8
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20






Ni: 0.05


X9
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20








X10
0.001
3.34
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
<0.03

0.001






X11
0.001
3.30
0.10
<0.002
<0.004
<0.002
0.20

0.007














The grain oriented electrical steel sheets were produced under production conditions shown in Table D3. The production conditions other than those shown in the tables were the same as those in the above Example 1.


In the examples except for No. 4009, the annealing separator which mainly included MgO was applied to the steel sheets, and then final annealing was conducted. On the other hand, in No. 4009, the annealing separator which mainly included alumina was applied to the steel sheets, and then final annealing was conducted.











TABLE D3









PRODUCTION CONDITION










HOT ROLLING


















TEMPERATURE


HOT BAND
COLD ROLLING




HEATING
OF FINAL
COILING
SHEET
ANNEALING
SHEET
















STEEL
TEMPERATURE
ROLLING
TEMPERATURE
THICKNESS
TEMPERATURE
TIME
THICKNESS


No.
TYPE
° C.
° C.
° C.
mm
° C.
SECOND
mm





4001
X1
1400
1100
500
2.6
1100
180
0.26


4002
X2
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4003
X3
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4004
X4
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4005
X5
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4006
X6
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4007
X7
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4008
X8
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4009
X9
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4010
X9
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4011
X9
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4012
X10
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26


4013
X11
1150
900
550
2.8
1100
180
0.26












PRODUCTION CONDITION










DECARBURIZATION




ANNEALING












GRAIN SIZE
NITROGEN

















COLD ROLLING
OF PRIMARY
CONTENT






REDUCTION
RECRYSTALLIZED
AFTER
FINAL ANNEALING



















STEEL
OF COLD
GRAIN
NITRIDATION


TD
TE1
TF



No.
TYPE
ROLLING %
m
ppm
PA
PB
MINUTE
MINUTE
MINUTE







4001
X1
90.0
9

0.2
0.003
300
300
300



4002
X2
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4003
X3
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4004
X4
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4005
X5
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4006
X6
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4007
X7
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4008
X8
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4009
X9
90.7
22
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4010
X9
90.7
25
220
0.1
0.002
600
300
300



4011
X9
90.7
23
220
※1
0.002
400
300
300



4012
X10
90.7
23
220
0.2
0.002
300
300
300



4013
X11
90.7
16
210
0.2
0.01
360
150
300







IN THE ABOVE TABLE, “※1” INDICATES THAT “PH2O/PH2 IN 700 TO 750° C. WAS CONTROLLED TO BE 0.2, AND PH2O/PH2 IN 750 TO 800° C. WAS CONTROLLED TO BE 0.03”.






The insulation coating which was the same as those in the above Example 1 was formed on the surface of produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets (final annealed sheets).


The produced grain oriented electrical steel sheets had the intermediate layer which was arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet) and the insulation coating which was arranged in contact with the intermediate layer, when viewing the cross section whose cutting direction is parallel to thickness direction.


In the grain oriented electrical steel sheets except for No. 4009, the intermediate layer was forsterite film whose average thickness was 1.5 μm, and the insulation coating was the coating which mainly included phosphate and colloidal silica and whose average thickness was 2 μm. On the other hand, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheet of No. 4009, the intermediate layer was oxide layer (layer which mainly included SiO2) whose average thickness was 20 nm, and the insulation coating was the coating which mainly included phosphate and colloidal silica and whose average thickness was 2 μm.


Moreover, in the grain oriented electrical steel sheets of No. 4012 and No. 4013, by laser irradiation after forming the insulation coating, linear minute strain was applied so as to extend in the direction intersecting the rolling direction on the rolled surface of steel sheet and so as to have the interval of 4 mm in the rolling direction. It was confirmed that the effect of reducing the iron loss was obtained by irradiating the laser.


Various characteristics of the obtained grain oriented electrical steel sheet were evaluated. The evaluation methods were the same as those in the above Example 1. The evaluation results are shown in Table D4.












TABLE D4









PRODUCTION RESULTS












BOUNDARY





EXISTENCE OF











SWITCHING
EVALUATION RESULTS














BOUNDARY
AVERAGE GRAIN SIZE

MAGNETIC CHARACTERISTICS


















STEEL
EXISTENCE
RBL
RAL
DEVIATION ANGLE
B8
λp-p
W17/50


















No.
TYPE
NONE
RBL/RAL
mm
mm
σ(|γ|)
T
@1.9 T
W/kg
NOTE




















4001
X1
EXISTENCE
1.24
27.7
22.3
2.83
1.931
0.373
0.848
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4002
X2
EXISTENCE
1.17
24.7
21.2
3.77
1.921
0.426
0.871
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4003
X3
EXISTENCE
1.13
24.4
21.5
3.80
1.920
0.442
0.876
EXAMPLE


4004
X4
EXISTENCE
1.15
24.9
21.7
3.78
1.922
0.446
0.862
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4005
X5
EXISTENCE
1.14
24.2
21.3
3.76
1.920
0.444
0.874
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4006
X6
EXISTENCE
1.20
25.0
20.9
3.75
1.925
0.432
0.856
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4007
X7
EXISTENCE
1.21
25.1
20.7
3.74
1.927
0.418
0.853
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4008
X8
EXISTENCE
1.14
24.5
21.5
3.82
1.920
0.445
0.875
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4009
X9
EXISTENCE
1.15
24.3
21.2
3.79
1.922
0.442
0.870
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4010
X9
NONE
0.94
27.2
28.9
4.01
1.917
0.623
0.886
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


4011
X9
NONE
0.92
26.9
29.3
3.98
1.919
0.641
0.882
COMPARATIVE












EXAMPLE


4012
X10
EXISTENCE
1.22
22.4
18.3
3.77
1.912
0.421
0.823
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE


4013
X11
EXISTENCE
1.45
23.6
16.3
2.10
1.943
0.343
0.756
INVENTIVE












EXAMPLE









In Nos. 4001 to 4013, when λp-p@1.9 T was 0.620 or less, the magnetostriction characteristic was judged to be acceptable.


In Nos. 4001 to 4013, the inventive examples included the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples exhibited excellent magnetostriction in high magnetic field. On the other hand, although the comparative examples included the deviation angle γ which was slightly and continuously shifted in the secondary recrystallized grains, the comparative examples did not sufficiently include the boundary which satisfied the boundary condition BA and which did not satisfy the boundary condition BB, and thus these examples did not exhibit preferred magnetostriction in high magnetic field.


INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

According to the above aspects of the present invention, it is possible to provide the grain oriented electrical steel sheet in which the magnetostriction in high magnetic field range (especially in magnetic field where excited so as to be approximately 1.9 T) is improved. Accordingly, the present invention has significant industrial applicability.


REFERENCE SIGNS LIST




  • 10 Grain oriented electrical steel sheet (silicon steel sheet)


  • 20 Intermediate layer


  • 30 Insulation coating


Claims
  • 1. A grain oriented electrical steel sheet comprising, as a chemical composition, by mass %, 2.0 to 7.0% of Si,0 to 0.030% of Nb,0 to 0.030% of V,0 to 0.030% of Mo,0 to 0.030% of Ta,0 to 0.030% of W,0 to 0.0050% of C,0 to 1.0% of Mn,0 to 0.0150% of S,0 to 0.0150% of Se,0 to 0.0650% of Al,0 to 0.0050% of N,0 to 0.40% of Cu,0 to 0.010% of Bi,0 to 0.080% of B,0 to 0.50% of P,0 to 0.0150% of Ti,0 to 0.10% of Sn,0 to 0.10% of Sb,0 to 0.30% of Cr,0 to 1.0% of Ni, anda balance consisting of Fe and impurities, andcomprising a texture aligned with Goss orientation, characterized in that,when α is defined as a deviation angle from an ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a normal direction Z,β is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a transverse direction C,γ is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a rolling direction L,crystal orientations are measured on at least 500 measurement points with 1 mm intervals on a sheet surface,(α1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent deviation angles of crystal orientations measured at two measurement points which are adjacent on the sheet surface and which have the interval of 1 mm,a boundary condition BA is defined as |γ2−γ1|≥0.5°, anda boundary condition BB is defined as [(α2−α1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2≥2.0°,a boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB is included, anda value of dividing a number of the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA by a number of the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB is 1.10 or more.
  • 2. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L anda grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L,the grain size RAL and the grain size RBL satisfy 1.10≤RBL÷RAL.
  • 3. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 2, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 4. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein when a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C anda grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,the grain size RAC and the grain size RBC satisfy 1.10≤RBC÷RAC.
  • 5. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 4, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 6. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L anda grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C,the grain size RAL and the grain size RAC satisfy 1.15≤RAC÷RAL.
  • 7. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 6, wherein when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L anda grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC satisfy 1.50≤RBC÷RBL.
  • 8. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 7, wherein when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L,a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L,a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C, anda grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,the grain size RAL, the grain size RAC, the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC satisfy (RBC×RAL)÷(RBL×RAC)<1.0.
  • 9. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 8, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 10. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 7, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 11. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 6, wherein when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L,a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L,a grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C, anda grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,the grain size RAL, the grain size RAC, the grain size RBL, and the grain size RBC satisfy (RBC×RAL)÷(RBL×RAC)<1.0.
  • 12. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 11, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 13. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 6, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 14. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein when a grain size RBL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the rolling direction L anda grain size RBC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BB in the transverse direction C,the grain size RBL and the grain size RBC are 22 mm or larger.
  • 15. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 14, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 16. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein when a grain size RAL is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the rolling direction L anda grain size RAC is defined as an average grain size obtained based on the boundary condition BA in the transverse direction C,the grain size RAL is 30 mm or smaller and the grain size RAC is 400 mm or smaller.
  • 17. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 16, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 18. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein σ(|γ|) which is a standard deviation of an absolute value of the deviation angle γ is 0° to 3.50°.
  • 19. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 18, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 20. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein a magnetic domain is refined by at least one of applying a local minute strain and forming a local groove.
  • 21. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 20, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 22. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein an intermediate layer is arranged in contact with the grain oriented electrical steel sheet andan insulation coating is arranged in contact with the intermediate layer.
  • 23. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 22, wherein the intermediate layer is a forsterite film with an average thickness of 1 to 3 μm.
  • 24. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 23, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 25. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 22, wherein the intermediate layer is an oxide layer with an average thickness of 2 to 500 nm.
  • 26. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 25, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 27. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 22, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 28. The grain oriented electrical steel sheet according to claim 1, wherein the grain oriented electrical steel sheet includes, as the chemical composition, at least one of Nb, V, Mo, Ta, and W, andan amount thereof is 0.0030 to 0.030 mass % in total.
  • 29. A grain oriented electrical steel sheet comprising, as a chemical composition, by mass %, 2.0 to 7.0% of Si,0 to 0.030% of Nb,0 to 0.030% of V,0 to 0.030% of Mo,0 to 0.030% of Ta,0 to 0.030% of W,0 to 0.0050% of C,0 to 1.0% of Mn,0 to 0.0150% of S,0 to 0.0150% of Se,0 to 0.0650% of Al,0 to 0.0050% of N,0 to 0.40% of Cu,0 to 0.010% of Bi,0 to 0.080% of B,0 to 0.50% of P,0 to 0.0150% of Ti,0 to 0.10% of Sn,0 to 0.10% of Sb,0 to 0.30% of Cr,0 to 1.0% of Ni, anda balance comprising Fe and impurities, andcomprising a texture aligned with Goss orientation, characterized in that,when α is defined as a deviation angle from an ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a normal direction Z,β is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a transverse direction C,γ is defined as a deviation angle from the ideal Goss orientation based on a rotation axis parallel to a rolling direction L,crystal orientations are measured on at least 500 measurement points with 1 mm intervals on a sheet surface,(α1 β1 γ1) and (α2 β2 γ2) represent deviation angles of crystal orientations measured at two measurement points which are adjacent on the sheet surface and which have the interval of 1 mm,a boundary condition BA is defined as |γ2−γ1|≤0.5°, anda boundary condition BB is defined as [(a2−a1)2+(β2−β1)2+(γ2−γ1)2]1/2≥2.0°,a boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA and which does not satisfy the boundary condition BB is included, anda value of dividing a number of the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BA by a number of the boundary which satisfies the boundary condition BB is 1.10 or more.
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
2018-143542 Jul 2018 JP national
2018-143896 Jul 2018 JP national
2018-143899 Jul 2018 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2019/030066 7/31/2019 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/027219 2/6/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (10)
Number Name Date Kind
4437910 Nozawa et al. Mar 1984 A
5718775 Komatsubara et al. Feb 1998 A
6379810 Hiramoto Apr 2002 B1
20090173413 Ushigami Jul 2009 A1
20130160901 Omura et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130213525 Shingaki et al. Aug 2013 A1
20170298467 Suehiro et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180002773 Shingaki et al. Jan 2018 A1
20210043345 Kataoka et al. Feb 2021 A1
20210355557 Nakamura et al. Nov 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (35)
Number Date Country
105220071 Jan 2016 CN
107109563 Aug 2017 CN
0577124 Oct 2002 EP
52-24116 Feb 1977 JP
57-2839 Jan 1982 JP
61-190017 Aug 1986 JP
2-200732 Aug 1990 JP
2-258923 Oct 1990 JP
2000-277331 Oct 2000 JP
2001-192785 Jul 2001 JP
2001-254155 Sep 2001 JP
2001254155 Sep 2001 JP
2001-294996 Oct 2001 JP
3456742 Oct 2003 JP
3470475 Nov 2003 JP
2004-60026 Feb 2004 JP
2005-240079 Sep 2005 JP
2005-240102 Sep 2005 JP
2007-314826 Dec 2007 JP
2009-235471 Oct 2009 JP
2012-52229 Mar 2012 JP
2012-77380 Apr 2012 JP
4962516 Jun 2012 JP
2012-177149 Sep 2012 JP
2015-206114 Nov 2015 JP
2017-128765 Jul 2017 JP
10-2013-0014892 Feb 2013 KR
WO-2015040799 Mar 2015 WO
WO 2016056501 Apr 2016 WO
WO 2019182154 Sep 2019 WO
WO 2020027215 Feb 2020 WO
WO 2020027218 Feb 2020 WO
WO 2020027219 Feb 2020 WO
WO 2021156960 Aug 2021 WO
WO 2021156980 Aug 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
JIS C 2556, 2015, total 25 pages.
Lyakishev, “Internet Engineering,” Encyclopedic Dictionary of Metallurgy, vol. 2, 2000, pp. 231-232.
Russian Office Action and Search Report for Russian Application No. 2021101524, dated Jul. 8, 2021, with English translation.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220372589 A1 Nov 2022 US