The present disclosure generally relates to the field of flight display applications and more particularly to a graphical method to select formats on a display.
Currently, the process for a user such as a pilot to change a format of a graphical display for one of the systems on an aircraft may be complex. For example, a change to the format of the display may be controlled by multiple controls and locations. The operation of these controls and systems may be inconsistent. Similarly, the existing controls and systems may not be intuitive and may entail considerable training time. In addition, the workload on the pilot in managing the displays can be considerable and may entail substantial heads-down operation.
Therefore, there exists a need for improved systems and methods for managing graphical displays on an aircraft.
The present disclosure is directed to a method for managing a graphical interface viewable on a display. The method may include the step of presenting a plurality of layout options, a layout option is at least one of a full window layout or a divided window layout. The method may also include the step of receiving a selection of a layout option from the plurality of layout options. A further step of the method includes presenting a preview of the selected layout option. The method also includes the step of presenting a plurality of icons, each icon corresponding to an application. A further step of the method includes receiving a selection of an icon for display within the selected layout option, the selected icon being compatible for display in the selected layout option.
The present disclosure is also directed to a system including a processor, memory, and a display. The memory includes a computer executable program code stored on the memory and configured to execute on the processor. The computer executable program code is configured for presenting a plurality of layout options and receiving a selection of a layout option from the plurality of layout options. The computer executable program code is further configured for presenting a preview of the selected layout option on the display as well as a plurality of icons. Each icon corresponds to an application. The computer executable program code is further configured for receiving a selection of an icon for display within the selected layout option, the selected icon being compatible for display in the selected layout option.
The present disclosure is also directed to a computer-readable device having computer-executable instructions for performing a method for managing a graphical interface viewable on a display. The instructions may include the step of presenting a plurality of layout options, a layout option is at least one of a full window layout or a divided window layout. The instructions may also include the step of receiving a selection of a layout option from the plurality of layout options. A further step of the instructions may include presenting a preview of the selected layout option. The instructions also include the step of presenting a plurality of icons, each icon corresponding to an application. A further step of the instructions may include receiving a selection of an icon for display within the selected layout option, the selected icon being compatible for display in the selected layout option.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not necessarily restrictive of the present disclosure. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate subject matter of the disclosure. Together, the descriptions and the drawings serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The numerous advantages of the disclosure may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Existing methods for managing display formats on an aircraft may entail the use of several controls for the various aircraft systems. These controls may not be cohesive and may be positioned in separate locations within the flight deck. For example, existing systems may require using a cursor control panel to control a multi-function display and a control display unit for controlling flight management system content. Similarly, the display control panel is used to control the primary flight display format and the cursor control panel may include menu buttons which are used to control the upper and lower windows of the multi-function display. The cursor control panel is also used for the full screen mode on a multifunction display. The control display unit may also be used for the flight management system content. Based on these examples, multiple input and control mechanisms are required in order to manage the various systems on the flight deck.
In addition, the process for changing a display configuration and content displayed on the displays associated with the systems on board the aircraft may require several steps. In one example, 10 separate steps may be required in order to change a display from a full screen display for a four quarter display for displaying four different applications.
The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for managing a graphical interface viewable on a display. Referring generally to
The processor 104 of the system 100 shown in
The memory 106 of the system 100 shown in
Examples of the content that may be provided using the system 100 and according to the method 200 are provided in
Referring generally to
In
On a right side of the format selection dialog box 302, a plurality of icons 318 are shown. Each icon 318 represents a corresponding application which may be run on the display. The applications are compatible with particular layout options 304, and not all applications may be compatible with all layout options 304. The compatibility of an application within a particular layout option 304, or within a particular window 320 of a layout option 304, may depend on a variety of factors including the application type, window size, and other factors. The compatibility of an application may be predetermined in one embodiment.
Based on the layout option 304 that is selected, the icons 318 are enabled or disabled by the processor depending on their compatibility with the selected layout option. If an icon 318 is compatible with a selected layout 316, the icon 318 will be enabled. If the icon 318 is not compatible with the selected layout, the icon 318 may be disabled and made not selectable by the user. In
In some embodiments, the selected layout 316 may include two or more windows 320. For example, the half window layout option 308 (shown in
A user, such as a pilot, may select the format as well as the icons 318 corresponding to the windows 320 of the selected format 316 and provide other input as desired using any suitable input system. For example, user input may be provided via a tactile feedback system, a haptic technology system, a touch screen, a multi-touch surface, a pressure-triggered screen with a stylus, a keyboard, a cursor control panel, or a mouse. Similarly, user input may be provided via a combination of these devices.
A user may also provide input to the system using a control panel based input such as a rotary knob 340, as shown in
When the user uses a control panel input method to provide input (for example, using the rotary knob shown 340 in
The display may also be configured to provide a preview 330 of the selected layout 316 and the application associated with the selected icons 318 to the user. Referring generally to
The preview 330 of the selected applications that is shown in
The graphical user interface 300 may also provide feedback to the user regarding selections by modifying the appearance of different elements shown on the graphical interface 300. For example, if a user attempts to select an icon 318 and move it to a window 320 where the icon is incompatible (for example, if the user tries to move an icon 318 to a half window of a two quarters one half layout 310 when the icon 318 is compatible in the quarter window only), the area corresponding to the quarter window(s) may change to a grey color to show the user that the selection is not valid. The area corresponding to the half window portion of the two quarters and one half layout 310 may not change colors in order to indicate it is a valid selection.
An additional feature of the graphical user interface 300 may include a swapping feature. The swapping feature may provide for the scenario when a user selects two instances of a single application to run on the graphical interface by selecting the same icon type twice. The graphical user interface 300 may be configured to swap a current application for the selected application in such an instance, according a set of rules. For example, in
An additional feature of the graphical user interface 300 may include an application retention feature. In this feature, a user may seek to change the layout while running one or more applications. The application retention feature may provide that one or more of the currently running applications may still be displayed in a window of the newly selected format. For example, if a user is currently running a full window 306 layout with a mapping application and the user wants to switch to a two half windows layout 308, the graphical user interface 300 may present the mapping application in one of the half windows of the two half windows layout 308.
The graphical user interface 300 is configured to provide feedback to the user in response to user selections. The feedback may be provided before a selection is made or after a selection is made or attempted. Feedback may be provided in a variety of manners in the graphical user interface 300, by highlighting items, modifying the color and appearance of elements of the display, and the like. For example, the first arrow 324 and the second arrow 326 may be displayed to help a user make selections. Similarly, the graphical user interface 300 may also provide feedback about a user selection via a consequence generator feature. For example, if a user selects an icon 318 that is incompatible with the selected window 320, the icon may “snap back” from the window 320 where the user attempts to drop it and revert back to icon's original location. This provides a visual feedback to the user that the input was received by the graphical user interface 300, but the selected icon 318 is not compatible in that location. In addition, the graphical user interface 300 provides feedback by modifying the appearance of selection options within the graphical user interface 300, for example, by highlighting selections or greying out unavailable options.
The system and methods of the present disclosure may provide several advantages. For example, the graphical user interface may be used to configure an entire display in a single dialog box. The graphical user interface may provide the configuration in a graphical sense that provides graphical feedback in response to a user's selections and changes, rather than a list. In addition, the systems and methods of the present disclosure may simplify the process for configuring a multi-function graphical user interface. This may reduce pilot workload. Similarly, the system and methods of the present disclosure may provide feedback regarding the selected configuration. For example, a preview window of the selections may be provided before the user is required to commit to the selections. In addition, the system and methods of the present disclosure may provide feedback on selections by generating consequences, informing a user that a selection has been recognized but is incompatible with the configuration. The systems and methods of the present disclosure may support consistency of operation and reduced training time. In addition, the systems and methods of the present disclosure may reduce pilot workload and also the amount of heads-down operation required.
In the present disclosure, the methods disclosed may be implemented as sets of instructions or software readable by a device. Further, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the methods disclosed are examples of exemplary approaches. Based upon design preferences, it is understood that the specific order or hierarchy of steps in the method can be rearranged while remaining within the disclosed subject matter. The accompanying method claims present elements of the various steps in a sample order, and are not necessarily meant to be limited to the specific order or hierarchy presented.
It is believed that the present disclosure and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the foregoing description, and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components without departing from the disclosed subject matter or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form described is merely explanatory, and it is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6466235 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6512527 | Barber et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
7231602 | Truelove | Jun 2007 | B1 |
8937744 | Shah et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9134891 | Schultz | Sep 2015 | B1 |
20040210847 | Berson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20100257446 | Woolfe et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120023157 | Roth | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120236037 | Lessing et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130222321 | Buening | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140109080 | Ricci | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140337794 | Vranjes et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351748 | Xia et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101007969 | Jan 2011 | KR |