A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The invention disclosed herein relates generally to user interfaces and, in particular, to graphical user interfaces for use with text-to-speech and automated speech recognition systems.
Voice or speech recognition and generation technology is gaining in importance as an alternative or supplement to other, conventional input and output devices. This will be particularly true with continued improvements and advances in the underlying software methodologies employed and in the hardware components which support the processing and storage requirements. As these technologies become more generally available to and used by the mass market, improvements are needed in the techniques employed in initializing and modifying speech recognition and generation systems.
A few products exist which allow users to process files of text to be read aloud by synthesized or recorded speech technologies. In addition, there are software products used to process spoken language as input, identify words and commands, and trigger an action or event. Some existing products allow users to add words to a dictionary, make modifications to word pronunciations in the dictionary, or modify the sounds created by a text-to-speech engine.
However, users of these products are required to understand and employ specialized information about grammar, pronunciation, and linguistic rules of each language in which word files are to be created. Moreover, in some of these products the means of representing pronunciations requires mastery of a mark-up language with unique pronunciation keys not generally used in other areas.
As a result, these products make text-to-speech and automated speech recognition technology inflexible and less accessible to the general public. They require users to become experts in both linguistic rules and programming techniques. The inflexibility arises in part because these products use general rules of the language in question to determine pronunciation without regard to context, such as geographic context in the form of dialects, or individual preferences regarding the pronunciation of certain words such as names.
Further, the existing products generally provide less than satisfactory results in pronunciations or translations of pronunciations. The products do not perform well with respect to many types of words including acronyms, proper names, technological terms, trademarks, or words taken from other languages. Nor do these products perform particularly well in accounting for variations in pronunciations of words depending on their location in a phrase or sentence (e.g., the word “address” is pronounced differently when used as a noun as opposed to a verb).
As a result, there is a need for a user interface method and system which expresses pronunciation rules and options in a simple way so that nonexpert users can take fuller advantage of the benefits of text-to-speech and speech recognition technologies.
It is an object of the present invention to solve the problems described above with existing text-to-speech and speech recognition systems.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a simple and intuitive user interface for setting and modifying pronunciations of words.
It is another object of the present invention to provide for the use in text-to-speech and speech recognition systems of sounds or letter groups which are not typically used in or even violate the rules of a language.
These and other objects of the invention are achieved by a method and user interface which allows users to make decisions about how to pronounce words and parts of words based on audio cues and common words with well known pronunciations.
Thus, in some embodiments, users input or select words for which they want to set or modify pronunciations. To set the pronunciation of a given letter or letter combination in the word, the user selects the letter(s) and is presented with a list of common words whose pronunciations, or portions thereof, are substantially identical to possible pronunciations of the selected letters. Preferably the list of sample, common words is ordered based on frequency of correlation in common usage, the most common being designated as the default sample word, and the user is first presented with a subset of the words in the list which are most likely to be selected.
In addition, embodiments of the present invention allow for storage in the dictionary of several different pronunciations for the same word, to allow for contextual differences and individual preferences.
Further embodiments provide for the storage of multiple dictionaries for different languages, but allow users to select pronunciations from various dictionaries to account for special words, parts of words, and translations. As a result, users may create and store words having any sound available to the system, even when the sound doesn't generally correspond with letters or letter groups according to the rules of the language.
In addition to modifying pronunciations of letters in a word, embodiments of the present invention allow users to easily break words into syllables or syllable-like letter groupings or word subcomponents even when the rules of a given language do not provide for such groupings as syllables, and to specify which such syllables should be accented. As used herein, the word syllable refers to such traditional syllables as well as other groupings.
The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, in which like references refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which:
Embodiments of the present invention are now described in detail with reference to the drawings in the figures.
A text to speech (“TTS”) and automated speech recognition (“ASR”) system 10 is shown in
Memory device or devices 16, which may be incorporated in computer apparatus 12 as shown or may be remotely located from computer 12 and accessible over a network or other connection, store several programs and data files in accordance with the present invention. A pronunciation selection program 26 allows, when executed on microcontroller 14 for the generation of the user interface described herein, the processing of a user's input and the retrieval of data from databases 28 and 30. Dictionary databases 28 are a number of databases or data files, one for each language handled by the system 10, which store character strings and one or more pronunciations associated therewith. Pronunciation databases 30 are a number of databases or data files, one for each of the languages, containing records each having a character or character group and a number of sample words associated therewith which contain characters that are pronounced in a manner which is substantially identical to the way the characters may be pronounced. The sample words are selected in creating the pronunciation databases 30 based on grammatical and linguistic rules for the language. Preferably, the sample words for each character or character group (e.g., dipthong) are ordered generally from more common usage in pronunciation of the character to less common.
Although shown as two databases, the dictionary database 28 and pronunciation database 30 may be structured as one data file or in any other format which facilitates retrieval of the pronunciation data as described herein and/or which is required to meet the needs of a given application or usage.
The system 10 further contains a TTS module 32 and ASR module 34 stored in memory 16. These modules are conventional and known to those of skill in the art and include, for example, the ViaVoice® software program available from IBM. These modules 32 and 34 convert text stored as digital data to audio signals for output by the speakers 20 and convert audio signals received through microphone 24 into digital data. The modules retrieve and utilize pronunciation data stored in the dictionary databases 28.
A method for allowing users to easily modify the pronunciation data stored in dictionary databases 28, as performed by pronunciation selection program 26, is described generally in
The process implemented by program 26 is described in more detail in
As explained above, the system 10 preferably contains multiple dictionary and pronunciation databases representing different languages. Referring now to
Next, the user can choose whether to test the pronunciation of the word, step 80, by selecting test button 202. The process of testing a word pronunciation is described below with reference to
The user can choose to modify the word's pronunciation, step 82, by selecting modify button 204. If not, the user can store the word and current pronunciation by selecting the “OK” button in dialog 190, step 84. If the word is not an existing word in the dictionary database 28, step 86, the word and pronunciation data are stored in the dictionary, step 88. As explained below with reference to
If the user wishes to modify the pronunciation, the three choices in selection list 206 are available.
The selected word, now appearing in input box 200, is broken into individual characters and copied into workspace 208. See
If the user selects to modify the syllable break, step 92, a breakpoint symbol 210 is displayed, see
If the user selects to modify the accent, step 98, an accent type selection icon group 212 is displayed in interface 190 (see
Referring now to
If the user selects one of the sample words, step 114, the pronunciation data, or portions thereof, for the selected word is associated with the letter(s) selected in the selected word contained in workspace 208, step 116. The modified word may then be modified further or stored, in accordance with the process described above, or may be tested as described below.
In accordance with certain aspects of the present invention, it is recognized that most languages including English contain words taken from other languages. Therefore, the user is given (e.g., in word list 214 after selecting “more”) the option of selecting a pronunciation for the selected letters from another language, step 118. The user then selects the desired language, step 120, and the program 26 retrieves sample words associated with the selected letter(s) from the pronunciation database file 30 for that selected language, step 122. The sample words are then presented for the user's selection as explained above.
As a result, a simple and flexible process is achieved for allowing users to modify word pronunciations. As one example of the ease and flexibility of the process, the word “michael” selected in
The process of testing a word's pronunciation is shown in
Because the system described herein allows for multiple pronunciations for a single word, the TTS module must identify which pronunciation is intended for the word. The TTS module can identify the pronunciation based on the context in which the word is used. For example, the pronunciations may be associated with objects such as users on a network, such that a message intended for a specific user would result in a correct selection of pronunciations. As another example, the TTS module may identify a word usage as noun vs. verb, and select the appropriate pronunciation accordingly.
While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many variations and modifications as will be evident to those skilled in this art may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and the invention is thus not to be limited to the precise details of methodology or construction set forth above as such variations and modification are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5027406 | Roberts et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5393236 | Blackmer et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5697789 | Sameth et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5799276 | Komissarchik et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5845238 | Fredenburg | Dec 1998 | A |
5850627 | Gould et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850629 | Holm et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5933804 | Huang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940797 | Abe | Aug 1999 | A |
5953692 | Siegel | Sep 1999 | A |
5999895 | Forest | Dec 1999 | A |
6012028 | Kubota et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016471 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6101468 | Gould et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6178397 | Fredenburg | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185535 | Hedin et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6226614 | Mizuno et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256630 | Gilai et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275789 | Moser et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6363347 | Rozak | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389394 | Fanty | May 2002 | B1 |
6865533 | Addison et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 372 734 | Jun 1990 | EP |
2224000 | Sep 1990 | JP |
8095587 | Apr 1996 | JP |
8320864 | Dec 1996 | JP |
5204389 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10336354 | Dec 1998 | JP |
200251154 | Apr 2002 | JP |
WO 98 45834 | Oct 1998 | WO |