The invention generally relates to gravel packing a well.
When well fluid is produced from a subterranean formation, the fluid typically contains particulates, or “sand.” The production of sand from the well must be controlled in order to extend the life of the well. One technique to accomplish this involves routing the well fluid through a downhole filter formed from gravel that surrounds a sandscreen. More specifically, the sandscreen typically is a cylindrical mesh that is inserted into and is generally concentric with the borehole of the well where well fluid is produced. Gravel is packed between the annular area between the formation and the sandscreen, called the “annulus.” The well fluid being produced passes through the gravel, enters the sandscreen and is communicated uphole via tubing that is connected to the sandscreen.
The gravel that surrounds the sandscreen typically is introduced into the well via a gravel packing operation. In a conventional gravel packing operation, the gravel is communicated downhole via a slurry, which is a mixture of fluid and gravel. A gravel packing system in the well directs the slurry around the sandscreen so that when the fluid in the slurry disperses, gravel remains around the sandscreen.
A potential challenge with a conventional gravel packing operation deals with the possibly that fluid may prematurely leave the slurry. When this occurs, a bridge forms in the slurry flow path, and this bridge forms a barrier that prevents slurry that is upstream of the bridge from being communicated downhole. Thus, the bridge disrupts and possibly prevents the application of gravel around some parts of the sandscreen.
One type of gravel packing operation involves the use of a slurry that contains a high viscosity fluid. Due to the high viscosity of this fluid, the slurry may be communicated downhole at a relatively low velocity without significant fluid loss. However, the high viscosity fluid typically is expensive and may present environmental challenges relating to its use. Another type of gravel packing operation involves the use of a low viscosity fluid, such as a fluid primarily formed from water, in the slurry. The low viscosity fluid typically is less expensive than the high viscosity fluid. This results in a better quality gravel pack (leaves less voids in the gravel pack than high viscosity fluid) and may be less harmful to the environment. However, a potential challenge in using the low viscosity fluid is that the velocity of the slurry must be higher than the velocity of the high viscosity fluid-based slurry in order to prevent fluid from prematurely leaving the slurry.
Thus, there exists a continuing need for an arrangement and/or technique that addresses one or more of the problems that are set forth above as well as possibly addresses one or more problems that are not set forth above.
In an embodiment of the invention, a technique that is usable with a subterranean well includes communicating a slurry through a shunt flow path and operating a control device to isolate slurry from being communicated to an ancillary flow path.
In another embodiment of the invention, a system that is usable with a subterranean well includes a shunt tube and a diverter. The shunt tube is adapted to communicate a slurry flow within the well to form a gravel pack. The diverter is located in a passageway of the shunt tube to divert at least part of the flow.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a technique that is usable with a subterranean well includes communicating a slurry through a shunt flow path and operating a control device to isolate the slurry from being communicated to an ancillary flow path.
Advantages and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following description, drawing and claims.
Referring to
In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a two-phase gravel packing operation is used to distribute gravel around the sandscreen 16. The first phase involves gravel packing the well from the bottom up by introducing a gravel slurry flow into the annulus 20. As the slurry flow travels through the well, the slurry flow loses its fluid through the sandscreen 20 and into the formation. That which enters the sandscreen returns to the surface of the well. During the first phase of the gravel packing operation, one or more bridges may eventually form in the annulus 20 due to the loss of fluid to the formation, thereby precluding further gravel packing via the straight introduction of the slurry flow into the annulus 20. To circumvent these bridges, the gravel packing enters a second phase in which the slurry flow is routed through alternative slurry flow paths.
More particularly, in some embodiments of the invention, the alternative flow paths are formed at least in part by shunt flow paths that are established by one or more shunt tubes 22 (one shunt tube depicted in
More specifically, as depicted in
As discussed further below, each of the depicted packing tubes 30a–d may be associated with a particular section of the well to be packed. For example, as depicted in
In some embodiments of the invention, the shunt tube(s) 22 may be located outside of the shrouds 32; and in some embodiments of the invention, the shunt tubes 22 may be located both inside and outside of the shrouds 32. Thus, many variations are possible and are within the scope of the claims.
As a more specific example of the two phase gravel packing operation,
More specifically, using
In some embodiments of the invention, the technique 60 includes preventing the communication through the shunt tube(s) between a particular section being packed and the adjacent section until the flow of slurry has been significantly impeded.
The significance of the blockage of the slurry flow affects the pressure of the slurry flow. Therefore, in some embodiments of the invention, the pressure increase initiates mechanisms (described below) that shut off packing in the current section and route the slurry flow to one or more alternate flow paths in the next section to be gravel packed. More particularly, when the bridge(s) cause the pressure of the slurry to reach a predetermined threshold (in accordance with some embodiments of the invention), communication to the next section to be packed is opened (block 72). Thus, slurry flows through the shunt tube(s) to the next section to be packed. Gravel packing thus proceeds to the next adjacent section, as depicted in block 68.
In some embodiments of the invention, one or more devices are operated to close off communication through the packing tube or tubes of the section at the conclusion of packing in that section, as described below. By isolating all packing tubes of previously packed sections, fluid loss is prevented from these sections, thereby ensuring that a higher velocity for the slurry may be maintained. This higher velocity, in turn, prevents the formation of bridges, ensures a better distribution of gravel around the sandscreen 16 and permits the use of a low viscosity fluid in the slurry (a fluid having a viscosity less than 30 approximately centipoises, in some embodiments of the invention).
The system 100 includes a plug 112 that is initially partially inserted into a radial opening 125 of the packing tube 30. In this state, the plug 112 does not impede a slurry flow 102 through the passageway of the packing tube 30. A spring 116 is located between the plug 112 and a sleeve 120. The sleeve 120, in some embodiments of the invention, is coaxial with the shunt tube 22, is closely circumscribed by the shunt tube 22 and is constructed to slide over a portion of the shunt tube 22 between the position depicted in
Initially, a shear screw 114 holds the spring 116 in a compressed state and holds the sleeve in the position depicted in
A lower end 139 of the sleeve 120 contains a rupture disk 134 that controls communication through the end 139. Initially, the rupture disk 134 blocks the slurry flow 24 from passing through the shunt tube 22. Thus, the slurry flow 24 exerts a downward force on the sliding sleeve 120 via the contact of the slurry 24 and the rupture disk 134. When the flow of slurry through the section being gravel packed becomes impeded, the pressure of the slurry 24 acting on the rupture disk 134 increases. The impeded flow may be due to the formation of one or more bridges in the annulus and/or packing tube(s), of the section, such as the exemplary bridge 109 that is shown as being formed in the packing tube 30 of
This subsequent state of the system 100 is depicted in
An alternative slurry distribution system 160 is depicted in
As depicted in
The sleeve 166 is constructed to move between the position depicted in
Over time, bridges, such as an exemplary bridge 183 shown in the packing tube 30, may form to impede the flow of the slurry. The resultant pressure increase in the slurry flow, in turn, creates a downward force on the sleeve 166. After the flow has been sufficiently impeded, the force on the sleeve 166 shears the shear screw 162 and causes the sleeve 166 to slide to the position in which the bottom end of the sleeve 166 rests against the stop 182. In this position, the radial opening 168 is misaligned with the opening to the packing tube 30; and thus, communication between the shunt tube 22 and packing tube 30 is blocked. This blockage along with any additional bridging increases pressure on the rupture disk 190 so that the rupture disk 190 ruptures.
This state of the system 160 is in
In some embodiments of the invention, a dampening layer may be included below a particular rupture disk in the shunt tube 22, such as the rupture disks 134 (
An exemplary dampening layer 199, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, is depicted in
The central passageway of the shunt tube 22 may be generally aligned with the passageway of the lower shunt tube 321. Therefore, due to inertia, the main flow path along which the slurry flow 24 propagates may generally be directed toward the central passageway of the lower shunt tube 310 and thus, toward the rupture disk 320. The deflector 304, however, deflects the slurry flow 24 away from the rupture disk 320 and toward the corresponding packing tubes 30. As depicted in
One function of the deflector 304 is to deflect a potential pressure spike that may be caused by the rupture of an upstream rupture disk. Thus, the deflector 304 may prevent premature rupturing of the rupture disk 320. Another potential advantage of the use of the deflector 304 is to prevent erosion of the rupture disk 320. More specifically, in some embodiments of the invention, the rupture disk 320 might erode due to particulates in the slurry 24. Over time, this erosion may affect the rupture threshold of the rupture disk 320. Therefore, without such a deflector 304, the rupture disk 320 may rupture at a lower pressure than desired.
The third function, which may be the major function of the deflector (in some embodiments of the invention), is to divert the gravel to the packing tube, after the rupture disk burst, in order to seal the packing tubes hydraulically.
In some embodiments of the invention, the slurry flow 24 gradually erodes the deflector 302 to minimize any local flow restriction. However, this erosion occurs well after the desired rupturing of the rupture disk 320.
As depicted in
Referring to
Although rupture disks have been described above, it is noted that other flow control devices, such as valves, for example, may be used in place of these rupture disks and are within the scope of the claims.
Orientational terms, such as “up,” “down,” “radial,” “lateral,” etc. may be used for purposes of convenience to describe the gravel packing systems and techniques as well as the slurry distribution systems and techniques. However, embodiments of the invention are not limited to these particular orientations. For example, the system depicted in
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4407183 | Milberger | Oct 1983 | A |
4945991 | Jones | Aug 1990 | A |
5082052 | Jones et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5113935 | Jones et al. | May 1992 | A |
5161613 | Jones | Nov 1992 | A |
5161618 | Jones et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5251699 | Lau et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5333688 | Jones et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5390966 | Cox et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5419394 | Jones | May 1995 | A |
5435391 | Jones | Jul 1995 | A |
5515915 | Jones et al. | May 1996 | A |
5560427 | Jones | Oct 1996 | A |
5588487 | Bryant | Dec 1996 | A |
5690175 | Jones | Nov 1997 | A |
5842516 | Jones | Dec 1998 | A |
5848645 | Jones | Dec 1998 | A |
5868200 | Bryant et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5890533 | Jones | Apr 1999 | A |
6059032 | Jones | May 2000 | A |
6179052 | Purkis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6220345 | Jones et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227303 | Jones | May 2001 | B1 |
6247536 | Leismer | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6298916 | Tibbles et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6409219 | Broome et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6464007 | Jones | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481494 | Dusterhoft et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6520254 | Hurst et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6588506 | Jones | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6588507 | Dusterhoft et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6702019 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020053439 | Danos | May 2002 | A1 |
20020079099 | Hurst et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104650 | Dusterhoft et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174984 | Jones | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020189808 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189809 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000700 | Hailey, Jr. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010496 | McGregor et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030029613 | Danos et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030034160 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2335216 | Sep 1999 | GB |
2385616 | Aug 2003 | GB |
9947788 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0004273 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0163089 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050045327 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |