The present invention is generally directed to gravity filters, and is specifically directed to filters comprising a porous non-woven filter and a loose bed of activated carbon and heavy metal scavenger material.
Fluid contaminants, particularly contaminants in water, may include various elements and compositions such as heavy metals (e.g., lead), microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, viruses), acids (e.g., humic acids), or any contaminants listed in NSF/ANSI Standard No. 53. As used herein, the terms “microorganism”, “microbiological organisms”, “microbial agent”, and “pathogen” are used interchangeably. These terms, as used herein, refer to various types of microorganisms that can be characterized as bacteria, viruses, parasites, protozoa, and germs. In a variety of circumstances, these contaminants, as set forth above, must be removed before the water can be used. For example, in many medical applications and in the manufacture of certain electronic components, extremely pure water is required. As a more common example, any harmful contaminants must be removed from the water before it is potable, i.e., fit to consume. While filtering is conducted in some industrial/municipal water treatment systems, these filters may not be suitable for and/or achieve the removal performance suitable or required for use in consumer-friendly water filtering applications, e.g. household and personal use filter applications, and/or to produce potable water. As a result, there is a continual need for filters with improved removal capability of contaminants.
According to one embodiment, a gravity filter is provided. The gravity filter comprises a loose filter bed comprising ion exchange resin particles and activated carbon particles, and a porous nonwoven filter substrate disposed downstream of the loose filter bed, wherein the porous nonwoven filter substrate comprises an impregnated heavy metal scavenger.
According to yet another embodiment, the gravity filter comprises a filter housing, a loose filter bed disposed in the filter housing and comprising weak acid ion exchange resin and activated carbon, and a porous nonwoven filter substrate disposed downstream of the loose filter bed inside the filter housing, wherein the porous nonwoven filter substrate comprises glass fibers and is impregnated with amorphous titanium silicate.
These and additional objects and advantages provided by the embodiments of the present invention will be more fully understood in view of the following detailed description, in conjunction with the drawings.
The following detailed description of specific embodiments of the present invention can be best understood when read in conjunction with the drawings enclosed herewith.
The embodiments set forth in the drawings are illustrative in nature and not intended to be limiting of the invention defined by the claims. Moreover, individual features of the drawings and invention will be more fully apparent and understood in view of the detailed description.
Definitions
“Bio-based content” refers to the amount of carbon from a renewable resource in a material as a percent of the mass of the total organic carbon in the material, as determined by ASTM D6866-10, method B. As would be understood, carbon from inorganic sources such as calcium carbonate is not included in determining the bio-based content of the material.
“Petroleum” refers to crude oil and its components of paraffinic, cycloparaffinic, and aromatic hydrocarbons. Crude oil may be obtained from tar sands, bitumen fields, and oil shale.
“Renewable” refers to a natural resource that can be replenished within a 100 year time frame. The resource may be replenished naturally, or via agricultural techniques. Renewable resources include plants, animals, fish, bacteria, fungi, and forestry products. They may be naturally occurring, hybrids, or genetically engineered organisms. Natural resources such as crude oil, coal, and peat which take longer than 100 years to form are not considered to be renewable resources.
The filters, which are described in detail below, are operable individually to remove contaminants such as heavy metals, humic acids, and/or microorganisms from fluids. By using a combination of filter media, the filters may remove such contaminants more effectively and/or at an increased level. The water filters may be used in industrial and commercial applications as well as personal consumer applications, e.g., household and personal use applications. The water filter is operable to be used with various fixtures, appliances, or components familiar to one of skill in the art. For example, it can be used in a refrigerator for water filtering, or mounted inside a fluid pitcher. In yet another embodiment, the water filter may be faucet mounted.
Referring to
Without being bound by theory, metal removal by the heavy metal scavenger impregnated porous non-woven substrate is improved by the addition of the ion exchange resin in the loose bed. Due to this combination, the present filter is capable of meeting the new NSF 53 standards for lead reduction. NSF Standard 53, which applies to drinking water treatment units, sets requirements for reduction of specific health-related contaminants, such as Cryptosporidium, Giardia, lead, volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), MTBE (methyl tertiary-butyl ether) that may be present in drinking water. In accordance with the NSF standard 53, the filters of the present invention are capable of reducing lead in a fluid from a concentration of 150 ppb to less than 10 ppb, or less than 4 ppb, or less than 2 ppb.
While many compositions are contemplated, the ion exchange resin may be a weak acid cationic exchange resin, which uses carboxylic acid as the functional group. For example, the ion exchange resin may comprise a copolymer of acrylic acid. Examples of weak acid cation exchange resins are R&H IRC84, R&H IRC50, Ionac CC, ResinTech WACG and ResinTec WACMP. Alternatively, other ion exchange resins, for example, strong acid cationic exchange resins, such as sulfonic resins, are also contemplated herein. In one or more embodiments, the loose bed comprises about 20 to about 70% by weight ion exchange resin, or about 40 to about 60% by weight ion exchange resin, or about 52 to about 56% by weight ion exchange resin.
In accordance with a few exemplary embodiments, the activated carbon particles of the carbon filter may comprise carbons from a variety of sources, e.g., wood-based carbon, coconut carbon, recycled carbon, or combinations thereof. In an exemplary commercial embodiment, the activated carbon particles comprise coconut carbon. Other sources, for example, suitable lignocellulose derived carbons, are contemplated herein. Various recycled carbon sources are also suitable. For example, and not by way of limitation, the renewable carbon sources may include CO2, molasses, whey, cellulose hydrolysates, starch hydrolysates, industrial effluents, cellulosic wastes, nutshells, or combinations thereof. To conserve costs and minimize environmental detriment, regeneration of activated carbon is often utilized. For example, current regeneration methods may include thermal regeneration, chemical and solvent regeneration, microbial regeneration, electrochemical regeneration, ultrasonic regeneration, wet air oxidation, or combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, it may be desirable to use mixtures of carbon particles to achieve a desired particle and pore size distribution. For example, wood based carbons, which are predominantly mesoporous (between 2 and 50 nm pore size) and coconut carbons, which are predominantly microporous (less than 2 nm pore size), may be mixed together. Examples of such activated carbon particle structures and compositions are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,316,323, 6,852,224, 6,827,854, 6,783,713, 6,733,827, 6,565,749, 6,423,224, 6,290,848, and U.S. Publication Nos. 20080015611, 20070080103, 20040159596, 20040232065, 20040129617, and 20040164018, which are all incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
As used herein, the phrase “median particle size” refers to the diameter of a particle below or above which 50% of the total volume of particles lies. This median particle size is designated as Dv,0.50. While many methods and machines are known to those skilled in the art for fractionating particles into discreet sizes, sieving is one of the easiest, least expensive and common ways to measure particle sizes and particle size distributions. An alternative preferred method for determining size distribution of particles is with light scattering. Further, the phrase, “particle span” is a statistical representation of a given particle sample and can be calculated as follows. First, the median particle size, Dv,0.50, is calculated as described above. Then by a similar method, the particle size that separates the particle sample at the 10% by volume fraction, Dv,0.10, is determined, and then the particle size that separates the particle sample at the 90% by volume fraction, Dv,0.90, is determined. The particle span is then equal to: (Dv,0.9−Dv,0.10)/Dv,0.50. In one exemplary embodiment, the carbon filter may comprise activated carbon filter particles having a median particle size of less than about 100 μm, less than about 50 μm, less than about 40 μm, less than about 37.5 μm, or less than about 35 μm. Moreover, the filter particles may have a particle span from about 1.8 or less, about 1.5 or less, about 1.4 or less, and about 1.3 or less.
Additionally, the activated carbon may demonstrate a mesopore volume from about 0.5 ml/gm to about 0.7 ml/gm, and a total pore volume from about 1 ml/gm to about 1.5 ml/gm. Moreover, in one exemplary embodiment, the activated carbon may include mesopores having a pore diameter from about 2 nm to about 50 nm, a particle size of about 30 μm diameter, and a particle span from about 1 to about 1.6, or from about 1.3 to about 1.4. As used herein, the term “mesopore” is intended to refer to an intra-particle pore having a width or diameter between 2 nm and 50 nm (or equivalently, between 20 Å and 500 Å). As used herein, the phrase “mesopore volume” refers to the volume of all mesopores. Similar to the ion exchange resin, various amounts are contemplated for the activated carbon in the loose bed. For example, the loose bed may comprise about 30 to about 70% by weight activated carbon, or from about 40 to about 50% by weight activated carbon.
The porous nonwoven substrate may comprise various materials familiar to one or ordinary skill in the art. Materials used in current commercial nonwoven fabrics, for example, polyolefins or polyesters, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), may derived from non-renewable resources, especially petroleum. In one or more embodiments, the nonwoven polyolefins may comprise polyethylene, polypropylene, and combinations thereof. Such polymers are at least partially derived from ethylene glycol or related compounds which are obtained directly from petroleum via cracking and refining processes. Thus, the price and availability of the petroleum feedstock ultimately has a significant impact on the price of nonwoven fabrics which utilize materials derived from petroleum. As the worldwide price of petroleum escalates, so does the price of such nonwoven fabrics.
Consequently, the porous nonwoven substrate of the present invention may also be at partially derived from renewable resources. For example, the porous nonwoven substrate may comprise a bio-based content of about 10% to about 100% using ASTM D6866-10, method B. The application of ASTM D6866-10 to derive a “bio-based content” is built on the same concepts as radiocarbon dating, but without use of the age equations. The analysis is performed by deriving a ratio of the amount of organic radiocarbon (14C) in an unknown sample to that of a modern biomass reference standard, for example, corn. In further embodiments, a nonwoven substrate comprises a bio-based content value from about 25% to about 75% using ASTM D6866-10, method B. In yet another embodiment, a structured fibrous web comprises a bio-based content value from about 50% to about 60% using ASTM D6866-10, method B.
A suitable example of renewable nonwoven materials are renewable polyesters. Renewable polyesters can include alkylene terephthalates. Such suitable alkylene terephthaltes at least partially derived from renewable resources can include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), polycyclohexylene dimethyl terephthalate (PCT), and combinations thereof. For example, such bio-sourced alkylene terephthalates are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,666,501; U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2009/0171037, 2009/0246430, 2010/0028512, 2010/0151165, 2010/0168371, 2010/0168372, 2010/0168373, and 2010/0168461; and PCT Publication No. WO 2010/078328, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
An alternative to bio-sourced PET can include poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF), which can be produced from renewable materials. PEF can be a renewable or partially renewable polymer that has similar thermal and crystallization properties to PET. PEF serve as either a sole replacement or a blend with petro based PET (or another suitable polymer) in spunbond fibers and the subsequent production of a non-woven based on these fibers with renewable materials. Examples of these PEFs are described in PCT Publication Nos. WO 2009/076627 and WO 2010/077133, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference. Certain polylactic acid fibers which can be used in place of other polyesters, such as PET, are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,175, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Alternatively, the nonwoven substrate may comprise cellulose and glass fibers Suitable nonwoven materials may be commercially available from Ahlstrom Corporation. Nonwoven materials may also be available from recycled waste streams. It is contemplated that the porous nonwoven filter substrate may comprise a hydrophobic binder, e.g., a polyethylene binder, a hydrophilic binder (e.g., a latex based binder), or combinations thereof.
Although various pore sizes are contemplated, the porous nonwoven substrate may comprise an average pore size of up to about 15 μm, or about 3 μm to about 14 μm, or an average pore size of from about 5 μm to about 7 μm. For lead or heavy metal removal, various compositions familiar to the skilled person would be suitable. For example, the selection of heavy metal scavenger may be dependent on the types of metals or the form of metals, for example, the insoluble colloidal form of lead or soluble lead. In one embodiment, the heavy metal scavenger metal ion exchange zeolite sorbents such as amorphous titanium silicate, activated aluminas, zirconium oxides and hydroxides, and combinations thereof. In a specific embodiment, the heavy metal scavenger is an amorphous titanium silicate impregnated in the porous non-woven substrate. The porous nonwoven substrate with impregnated heavy metal scavenger may comprise up to about 40% by weight amorphous titanium silicate, or from about 18 to about 30 percent by weight amorphous titanium silicate, or about 20 to about 24 percent by weight amorphous titanium silicate. Various particle sizes are contemplated for the heavy metal scavenger (e.g., amorphous titanium silicate). For example, the ATS may have a mean diameter of up to about 100 μm, or from about 20 to about 80 μm, or about 30 to about 40 μm.
In further embodiments, the porous non-woven filter substrate may also be impregnated with other filtering materials, for example, activated carbon. The impregnated activated carbon in the porous non-woven substrate may comprise the same type(s) or different type(s) of activated carbon from the activated carbon in the loose bed. The activated carbon may be obtained from a recycled source of natural activated carbons.
In one embodiment, the porous non-woven substrate is produced by adding the ATS to a solution containing glass and cellulose fibers as well as the polyethylene binder. Then the mixture is sprayed or pumped onto a wire screen to remove the water, but leave the ATS entangled in the glass fiber. To produce the loose bed, the activated carbon particles and ion exchange resin are mixed together in loose particle form and are poured into the back of the filter.
It is also contemplated to use additional components, such as additional sorbents, in order to improve the filtering capacity of the present filters.
It is further noted that terms like “preferably,” “generally,” “commonly,” and “typically” are not utilized herein to limit the scope of the claimed invention or to imply that certain features are critical, essential, or even important to the structure or function of the claimed invention. Rather, these terms are merely intended to highlight alternative or additional features that may or may not be utilized in a particular embodiment of the present invention.
For the purposes of describing and defining the present invention it is additionally noted that the term “substantially” is utilized herein to represent the inherent degree of uncertainty that may be attributed to any quantitative comparison, value, measurement, or other representation. The term “substantially” is also utilized herein to represent the degree by which a quantitative representation may vary from a stated reference without resulting in a change in the basic function of the subject matter at issue.
Having described the invention in detail and by reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. More specifically, although some aspects of the present invention are identified herein as preferred or particularly advantageous, it is contemplated that the present invention is not necessarily limited to these preferred aspects of the invention.
All documents cited in the Detailed Description of the Invention are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention. To the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this written document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to the term in this written document shall govern.
This application claims benefit to the U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/576,426 filed Dec. 16, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3870639 | Moore et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3954614 | Wright et al. | May 1976 | A |
4049858 | Murphy | Sep 1977 | A |
4092250 | Sano et al. | May 1978 | A |
4151092 | Grimm et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4643981 | Card | Feb 1987 | A |
4711718 | Nelson, Jr. | Dec 1987 | A |
5061367 | Hatch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5124177 | Kasmark et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5227053 | Brym | Jul 1993 | A |
5468847 | Heilmann et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5536394 | Lund et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536396 | Mudra | Jul 1996 | A |
D406003 | Tanner | Feb 1999 | S |
5882507 | Tanner et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911882 | Benjamin et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5993935 | Rasmussen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004460 | Palmer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6103114 | Tanner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6187192 | Johnston et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197193 | Archer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D440110 | Tanner et al. | Apr 2001 | S |
6241893 | Levy | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6274041 | Williamson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6290848 | Tanner et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6387144 | Jaroszczyk et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6423224 | Tanner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432233 | Hamlin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
D465377 | Murison | Nov 2002 | S |
6524477 | Hughes | Feb 2003 | B1 |
D473750 | Murison et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6565749 | Hou et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6602406 | Nohren et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6638426 | Fritter | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6649045 | Tanner et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6733827 | Mitchell et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6833075 | Hughes | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6852224 | Jagtoyen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861002 | Hughes | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878285 | Hughes | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881327 | Tanner et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7045067 | Brown et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7186441 | Mitchell et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7291208 | Dauber et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306659 | Gorton et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7442310 | Bortun et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7537695 | Mitchell et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7560142 | Bass | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7625492 | Jin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7632397 | Bathula | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7785544 | Alward et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020193453 | Bohling et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030173287 | Johnston et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220039 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040159605 | Hughes | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178142 | Koslow | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040251207 | Calberg | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029198 | Kaledin et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035041 | Nohren et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050098495 | Hughes | May 2005 | A1 |
20050247635 | Vo et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060021928 | Nelson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070950 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060163136 | Patil et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178264 | Kameshima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060226064 | Beckman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080023402 | Rawson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080023405 | Rawson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026041 | Tepper et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080230471 | Tamada et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090188870 | Schroeder et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090308800 | Astle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100006508 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100065503 | Olson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101569856 | Nov 2009 | CN |
0163440 | May 1985 | EP |
0402661 | May 1990 | EP |
1739060 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1900691 | Mar 2008 | EP |
52022588 | Feb 1977 | JP |
61011117 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61011118 | Jan 1986 | JP |
2003024723 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003062562 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003071214 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003230882 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2004174357 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004321977 | Nov 2004 | JP |
267399 | Dec 2006 | TW |
8601841 | Mar 1986 | WO |
8900977 | Feb 1989 | WO |
8911325 | Nov 1989 | WO |
9727884 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9830326 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0107090 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0187777 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0230766 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2004028660 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004052789 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005082523 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005113126 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2007073822 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007126828 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008110167 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009012189 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009017645 | Feb 2009 | WO |
20091401033 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report/Written Opinion dated May 27, 2013 for International Appln. No. PCT/IB2012/002953. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 17, 2014 pertaining to International application No. PCT/IB2012/002953. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140014566 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61576426 | Dec 2011 | US |