The invention relates to the field of closures; specifically hinge closures. In particular the invention relates to safety structures that incorporate hinges that operate primarily under the influence of gravity to secure closure of safety fences and gates.
The present invention relates to safety barriers, and in particular relates to safety fences and gates in which opened gates return automatically to a closed position. One particular use for hinges along this line is pedestrian traffic control in industrial work areas. For example, Federal regulatory authorities (e.g., OSHA and EPA) require extensive systems to control the path and flow of workers in industrial plants. Hinged gates and doors are often used to restrict movement in areas deemed dangerous or to seal off areas containing harmful materials. Typically these regulations are implemented by installing extensive railing systems painted in fluorescent colors, usually bright yellow.
A common feature of these systems are self-closing gates and doors. Currently, spring loaded gates which automatically close via the tension in the spring are most commonly used. Other types of gates that are known and could be used are gravity gates that close automatically via the action of gravity.
Gravity gates typically employ a cylindrical hinge consisting of at least two parts: a lower portion and an upper portion that rotates about an oblique junction upon the application of a rotational force. As the upper portion rotates, the two portions separate due to the oblique junction. The upper portion “rises” thereby storing potential energy which will cause the upper portion to “fall” or rotate back to a neutral position when the rotational force is terminated. Examples of such a gate are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,777 to Takimoto, U.S. Pat. No. 3,733,650 to Douglas and U.S. Pat. No. 4,991,259 to Finkelstein et al.
One problem associated with known gravity gates is common to all devices that employ moving parts: friction. In many instances the rotating portions of the hinges are in direct contact with one another which causes friction. If the portions are made of metal, as they often are, the friction could lead to premature failure of the hinge absent some form of external lubrication. External lubrication, most often in the form of grease, is messy and transitory thereby leading to frequent maintenance.
More recent designs of gravity gates incorporate polymers to reduce the weight of the hinge and friction. The Douglas, Takimoto and Finkelstein patents cited above discuss implementing polymers in the design of gravity gates. These patents discuss hinges that use polymer cams to translate rotational energy to potential energy. Although polymer cams reduce friction, polymer cams are far more susceptible to torsional failures than metallic cams. Furthermore, the devices of these patents utilize multiple polymeric parts which increases the likelihood of torsional failure. When these weaknesses are combined with the difficulties relating to machining and molding such intricate polymer parts, the impracticality of these hinges is readily apparent.
Another weakness of known hinge and gate designs is the free conduction of electricity. Many hinges and gates employ metal on metal contact which leads to the conduction of electricity. Such conduction can be fatal. For example, a hot wire falling on a metal railing could electrocute someone passing through a swing gate attached to the railing.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a hinge that automatically closes upon the application of gravity.
A further object of the invention is to provide a gravity hinge that is efficiently designed and easy to maintain.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a gravity hinge that eliminates the need for periodic lubrication of the hinge joint.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a gravity hinge, gate and fencing system that reduces or eliminates electrical conduction between the fence portion and the gate portion of the system.
The gravity hinge according to the invention meets these and other objects. The gravity hinge comprises an upper cylindrical knuckle having a first terminating surface and an opposing second terminating surface. The second terminating surface is oblique to the axis of the upper knuckle. The gravity hinge also comprises a lower cylindrical knuckle having a first terminating surface oblique to the axis of the lower knuckle. Preferably the oblique angle of the lower knuckle first terminating surface is approximately the same as the second surface of the upper knuckle. The lower knuckle also has an opposing second terminating surface.
A spindle, which is received by at least one of the knuckles, establishes rotating communication between the upper and lower knuckles. The upper and lower knuckles are situated such that the second terminating surface of the upper knuckle is opposed to the first terminating surface of the lower knuckle.
A bushing surrounds the spindle and separates the upper and lower knuckles. The bushing has a lower coefficient of friction with respect to the respective oblique surfaces of the upper and lower knuckles than the respective surfaces have for each other.
The invention provides a gravity hinge for use with a gate, door or other hinged closure. As used herein, the term “hinge” has its usual definition; e.g., “a jointed or flexible device on which a door, lid or other swinging part turns.” Merriam-Websters' Collegiate Dictionary (online edition, cited as of Jan. 9, 2001). Referring now to
Referring now to
The upper tubular cylindrical knuckle 16 is preferably made of metal but may be made of any suitable material (i.e., ceramic, polymers) provided the material possesses the requisite physical properties required for the particular use. For example, the hinge may be made electrically or thermally insulating by choosing an insulating ceramic or polymer. Suitable polymers include but are not limited to neat or “unfilled” polytetrafluoroethyelene (PTFE), polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW). Similarly, the hinge may be made electrically or thermally conductive by choosing an appropriate metal or modified polymer such as “filled” PTFE, PEEK or UHMW. The term polymer as used herein includes, but is not limited to, polymers and composites comprising polymers including fiberglass.
Theoretically, the angle of the oblique second terminating surface 20 may be any angle between 0° and 90°. As a practical matter, however, angles between about 30° and 50° are preferred, with angles of about 45° being most preferred.
The hinge 10 also comprises a lower cylindrical knuckle 24. The lower cylindrical knuckle 24 has a first terminating surface 26 that is oblique to the axis of the lower knuckle 24. Preferably the angle of the oblique first terminating surface 26 is approximately equal to the angle of the second terminating surface 20 of the upper tubular cylindrical knuckle 16. The lower cylindrical knuckle 24 also has a second terminating surface 28 separate from and opposing the first terminating surface 26. Preferably, the second terminating surface 28 is perpendicular to the first terminating surface 26, thus forming a structure resembling a truncated right circular cylinder. Just as with the upper tubular cylindrical knuckle 16, the lower cylindrical knuckle 24 may be made of metal or any other suitable manufacturing material (i.e., ceramic or polymer).
A spindle 30, which is received by at least one of the two knuckles, establishes rotating communication between the upper and lower knuckles. Stated alternatively, the spindle 30 rotatably engages the upper and lower knuckles 16, 24 such that the oblique terminating surfaces 20, 26 are proximate to each other.
In the embodiment shown in
In preferred embodiments, the spindle 30 and the lower cylindrical knuckle 24 are integral and the length of the spindle 30 extending from the lower knuckle 24 is greater than the maximum length of the upper cylindrical knuckle 16. Just as with the knuckles, the spindle 30 may be made of metal or any other suitable manufacturing material (i.e., ceramic or polymer).
A flange 22 attached to the outer surface of the lower cylindrical knuckle 24 secures the knuckle to the post or static structure utilized in conjunction with the hinge 10. The flange 22 may be manufactured integral with the lower cylindrical knuckle 24 or manufactured separate from the knuckle.
As shown in
The self-lubricating friction reducer 34 is formed of a material possessing a coefficient of friction with respect to the oblique surfaces of the upper and lower knuckles (20, 32) that is lower than the coefficient of friction between the two oblique surfaces (20, 32). Accordingly, the self-lubricating friction reducer 34 is not limited to any particular material. For example, in certain circumstances, it could be formed of metal (i.e., brass) or ceramic provided its coefficient of friction with respect to the oblique surfaces is lower than the coefficient of friction between the two oblique surfaces. As with the knuckles, the exact material of construction for the bushing will depend on individual circumstances. Suitable materials include but are not limited to those discussed in relation to the knuckles. In a preferred embodiment, the self-lubricating friction reducer is made from a polymer.
Preferably, the bushing 34 incorporates the same oblique angle as the oblique ledge 34. In other words, the bushing 34 is a uniform angled slice from a hollow right circular cylinder. Thus, bushing 34 separates the oblique surfaces (20, 32) while maintaining the angled relationship of the surfaces. The bushing 34 may be made of any suitable polymer that has an appropriate coefficient of friction and that is otherwise compatible with the structure and function of the hinge, gate and fence. Polyethylene, polyester, polypropylene, PTFE and PEEK are representative, and the exact polymer choice can be made by those of skill in this art and without undue experimentation based on factors such as cost, weight, ease of manufacture and industrial purpose. Alternatively, the bushing may be formed of a core material (e.g., metal) that is coated with a polymer. Furthermore, the efficient design of the hinge 10 (shown in
Another embodiment of the invention is shown in
More specifically and in reference to
A spindle 30 extends from the second terminating surface 54 of the upper knuckle 50. As with previous embodiments, the spindle 30 may be integral to the upper knuckle 50 or separate from the upper knuckle 50. In the latter embodiment, the upper knuckle 50 is preferably tubular and the spindle 30 possesses a cap or nut 56 that is larger than the diameter of the knuckle's tubular opening. The spindle 30 traverses the length of the upper knuckle 50 and the cap 56 prevents the spindle 30 from passing through tubular knuckle 50. The spindle 30 engages with a lower knuckle 58 which is also tubular as shown in
A self-lubricating friction reducer 34 similar to that described in previous embodiments separates the upper and lower knuckles 50, 58.
A further embodiment of the invention is shown in
As shown in
One knuckle should possess an opening of a size sufficient to receive both the spindle 30 and the tubular sleeve 84 of the self-lubricating friction reducer 86. In the embodiment shown in
Those skilled in the art will readily recognize that the self-lubricating friction reducer 86 may be oriented such that the sleeve 84 is received by the upper knuckle 80 in which case the upper knuckle 80 should possess an opening having a diameter sufficient to receive a spindle 30 and the sleeve 84 of the self-lubricating friction reducer 86. Alternatively, the self-lubricating friction reducer 86 could have sleeves 84 extending from both sides of the oblique portion (or bushing) 88. In this instance both knuckles should possess a suitable opening 89 to receive the sleeve 84.
In a further preferred embodiment the sleeve discussed above may be separate from the bushing. Referring again to
As with previous embodiments, the knuckles, self-lubricating friction reducer and sleeves may be made of any suitable material provided the material possesses the requisite structural, chemical and electrical properties. Self-lubricating friction reducers (including the sleeves) made of non-conducting polymers are particularly well suited for applications in which insulating a portion of the overall hinge, gate or fence is desired.
An additional embodiment of the invention is shown in
The invention has been described in detail, with reference to certain preferred embodiments, in order to enable the reader to practice the invention without undue experimentation. However, a person having ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that many of the components and parameters may be varied or modified to a certain extent without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Furthermore, titles, headings, or the like are provided to enhance the reader's comprehension of this document, and should not be read as limiting the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, only the following claims and reasonable extensions and equivalents define the intellectual property rights to the invention thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
170314 | Toedt | Nov 1875 | A |
424088 | Booraem | Mar 1890 | A |
898005 | Rodler | Sep 1908 | A |
1027716 | Fletcher | May 1912 | A |
1072364 | Roberts | Sep 1913 | A |
1076689 | McKinney | Oct 1913 | A |
1818182 | Woernle | Aug 1931 | A |
2860370 | Honnay | Nov 1958 | A |
3083402 | Foltz | Apr 1963 | A |
3398487 | Matyas | Aug 1968 | A |
3545032 | Dielman | Dec 1970 | A |
3725973 | Gwozdz | Apr 1973 | A |
3733650 | Douglas | May 1973 | A |
3862470 | Swank | Jan 1975 | A |
3921225 | Suska | Nov 1975 | A |
4215449 | Loikitz | Aug 1980 | A |
4630332 | Bisbing | Dec 1986 | A |
4631777 | Takimoto | Dec 1986 | A |
4697306 | Rhodes | Oct 1987 | A |
4720198 | DeBruyn | Jan 1988 | A |
4734013 | Valavaara | Mar 1988 | A |
4864691 | Gidseg et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4964193 | Rommelfaenger et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4991259 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5652694 | Martin | Jul 1997 | A |
5706556 | Kluting | Jan 1998 | A |
5881431 | Pieper, II et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3303801 | Aug 1984 | DE |
0136211 | Apr 1985 | EP |
5-86767 | Apr 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020116788 A1 | Aug 2002 | US |