The present invention generally relates to the field of power tools and more particularly to a saw having a greater cutting capacity.
Saws and in particular chop-saws, miter saws (both beveling and non-beveling), and the like are often configured to perform a chopping action. These devices are often utilized to cut large dimensioned workpieces such as large trim pieces, moldings and the like. For instance, in order to cut a piece of crown molding the workpiece may have to be angled up against a support fence while cutting occurs. This cutting action is problematic because the workpiece requires the saw have a large capacity in both a vertical direction and a horizontal direction (with respect to a fence). A saw's overall capacity may be limited, over a user's desire, especially when the saw is utilized to perform a beveled cut, a miter cut, or a combination cut. Previous saws employing a chopping type action were of limited capacity. As a result, the saw's cutting capacity may be adversely limited by the saw's configuration including the motor, the guards, and the like. Thus, the effective cutting capacity of the saw is diminished.
Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a saw having a greater effective cutting capacity for accepting a large dimensioned workpiece.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed generally to a saw having an enlarged effective cutting capacity.
In a first aspect of the present invention, a miter saw includes a base for at least partially supporting a workpiece thereon. A workpiece positioning fence is coupled substantially perpendicularly to the base to allow for workpiece positioning. A cutting assembly, including a motor orientated perpendicular to an arbor for rotating a circular saw blade and a gear assembly for transferring the rotational energy from the motor to the arbor, is pivotally mounted to the saw such that the assembly may clear the workpiece positioning fence when cutting a 45° (forty-five degree) miter.
In a further aspect of the present invention, a saw including a base, a workpiece positioning fence coupled substantially perpendicular to the base for position against a side of the fence includes a cutting assembly is pivotally mounted to the saw to achieve a full-cut position. When disposed in a full-cut position an included circular saw blade's periphery is disposed substantially equal to the intersection of the base support surface and workpiece positioning side of the workpiece positioning fence.
It is to be understood that both the forgoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention as claimed. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and together with the general description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The numerous advantages of the present invention may be better understood by those skilled in the art by reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the apparatus of the present invention may be implemented with various saws such as a chop-saw, a chop-type miter saw, a sliding miter saw without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Referring to
In the current embodiment, a support 116 extends away from the base 104 for supporting the cutting assembly 102. The support 116 is coupled to the turntable 108 so a user may rotate the turntable and thereby rotating the cutting assembly. In further embodiments, a chop saw (non-miter, non-bevel) support may be attached or directly fixed to the base. Furthermore, a support may be configured to be implemented with a sliding miter saw such as when a rail mechanism (such as a cylindrical rail or rails) is included between the base/turntable and the support. In still further embodiments, a support may include a coupling for connecting a sliding mechanism on the end of the support 116 distal from the base. Preferably, the support 116 may be of sufficient length (between the base and a pivotal connection with a mounting arm 124) to allow for maximum workpiece capacity. For example, the support is configured with an assembly pivot point further from the base than the center of rotation of a saw blade when a mounting arm is parallel with the base so as to allow for a downward/rear arc though-out the chopping range. Alternatively, the pivotal connection of the cutting assembly 102 and the base is adjacent the base 104 in further implementations.
In the present embodiment, the support 116 is coupled via a bevel mechanism, such as a trunnion 118. Other beveling mechanisms, for beveling a circular saw blade 110 with respect to the support surface 106, may be implemented as desired.
With continued reference to
Preferably, the mounting arm 124 is biased in a released position (away from the base as may be generally seen in
A motor for rotating a circular saw blade is included in the cutting assembly 102. The motor may be enclosed in a housing 132, or the like for protecting the motor from dust, debris, and the like. Preferably, the motor/motor housing 132 is orientated parallel to a plane substantially encompassing the saw blade 110, or substantially perpendicular to an arbor. Orientating the motor housing perpendicular to an arbor about which the saw blade rotates may promote a greater cutting capacity over that of a direct drive motor. For example, by orientating the motor parallel with the saw blade, the cutting assembly may be able to cut a larger workpiece, such as when mitering at 45° and/or beveling without contacting a fence/the workpiece. In another example, if an in-line motor is utilized, the motor may extend further towards a cutting zone (e.g., the area where the saw blade is cutting) of the saw generally located in quadrant adjacent the fence/support surface interface. In further embodiments, a circular saw blade may be driven by a belt drive or other transmission system so that the motor may be orientated away from the cutting blade.
Referring to
An upper blade guard 90 may extend generally about the portion of the saw blade 122 away from the base 104. For example, the saw blade guard 90 may generally cover a third of the saw blade away from the base. Moreover, the upper guard 90 may include an extension 148, or guard for covering a portion of the blade teeth adjacent a cutting zone. The extension may be formed unitary with the upper guard, or formed as a separate guard coupled to the upper guard. An extension 148 including on the upper blade guard may allow for a larger vertical cutting capacity without exposing additional teeth. Preferably, an extension is configured to maximize the vertical capacity established by the blade and the pivoting action of the cutting assembly as the cutting assembly pivots about the cutting assembly pivot point included on the support 116.
In additional examples, a lower blade guard 460 (as may be seen in
Referring now to
Preferably, the saw blade extends below the support surface 206, in a full-cut position such that a plane encompassing the support surface forms a chord through the saw blade in the range of greater than 8¼″ (eight and a quarter inches) for a 12″ (twelve inch) blade. This capacity is advantageous because a user is capable of cutting larger dimension lumber such as a 2″×10″ board (having an actual dimension of 1½″ by 9¼″ (one and a half inches by nine and a quarter inches)). More preferably, the cutting assembly is disposed in a full-cut position so that the support surface forms a chord through the saw blade of approximately 9¼″ (nine and a quarter inches) for a 12″ (twelve inches) blade thereby insuring a full cut through a 2″×10″ board (having an actual dimension of 1½″ by 9¼″). Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the capacity of 9¼″ (nine and a quarter inches) may be achieved without substantially sacrificing vertical capacity adjacent the arbor. For example, a saw configured generally in accordance with the foregoing may be capable of obtaining a lateral cutting capacity of greater than 75% (seventy-five percent) of the saw's diameter. More preferably, a saw may achieve approximately a 77% (seventy-seven percent) lateral cutting capacity as compared to the saw blade diameter. The foregoing being preferable as user may maximize capacity without having to purchase a more complex, or expensive saw. For instance, the arbor/arbor flange are disposed for at least a vertical capacity of 1½″ (one and a half inches) between the support surface and an arbor flange/motor housing.
Referring to
It is believed that the apparatus of the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood by the forgoing description. It is also believed that it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the components thereof without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention or without sacrificing all of its material advantages. The form herein before described being merely an explanatory embodiment thereof. It is the intention of the following claims to encompass and include such changes.
The present application is a Continuation-in-Part and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/717,987 entitled: Greater Cutting Capacity Saw, filed on Nov. 19, 2003, which in-turn claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Ser. No. 60/427,647, entitled: Greater Cutting Capacity Saw, filed on Nov. 19, 2002, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60427647 | Nov 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10717987 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 10801273 | Mar 2004 | US |