Green glass composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7094716
  • Patent Number
    7,094,716
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 4, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 22, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is a green soda-lime-silica glass composition. The composition comprises 68 to 75% SiO2, 10 to 18% Na2O, 5 to 15% CaO, 0 to 10% MgO, 0 to 5% Al2O3, and 0 to 5% K20, where CaO+MgO is 6 to 15% and Na2O+K20 is 10 to 20%, and colorants comprising: 0.3 to 0.8 wt. % total iron as Fe2O3 wherein the ratio of FeO/total Fe as Fe2O3 is 0.35 to 0.62; 0.05 to 0.5 wt. % manganese compound as MnO2; 0 to 0.1 wt. % titanium oxide as TiO2; and 0 to 1 wt. % cerium oxide as CeO2. The colored glass has the following spectral properties at 4.0 mm. thickness: 65 to 81% light transmittance using Illuminant A (LTA) and using Illuminant C has a dominant wavelength of 494 to 555 nanometers with an excitation purity of 2 to 9%.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention is directed to a green glass composition having a high redox ratio and method of producing the green glass.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It would be extremely advantageous to improve the infrared absorption of glass products while maintaining a high level of visible transmission and to also have a good absorption in the ultraviolet portion of the spectrum. Iron oxide exists in two chemical forms in the glass, an oxidized form which is yellow, Fe2O3, and a reduced form which is blue FeO. Advantageously, the oxidized form of iron oxide absorbs a portion of the ultraviolet light passing through the glass product and the reduced form of iron oxide absorbs a portion of the infrared light passing through the glass product. Under typical furnace firing conditions and batching conditions, when the total iron oxide in the glass product is within the range of about 0.3 to 1.2 wt. % as Fe2O3, the iron oxide equilibrium is such that the redox ratio of FeO/total Fe as Fe2O3 is about 0.23–0.26.


It is desirable to increase the proportion of reduced iron oxide (FeO) in the glass to improve its infrared absorption. In addition, by shifting the iron oxide away from the oxidized form (Fe2O3) the glass will change color from green to blue. It would be further desirable to shift the blue glass back to a green color and to simultaneously improve the ultra violet absorption as well as the infrared absorption.


One way commonly employed to shift the redox equilibrium of iron oxide in the glass, and hence its UV and IR properties, is by increasing the fuel to the furnace. Increasing the amount of fuel, however, has several undesirable consequences: the combustion heating of the furnace becomes inefficient and requires an air increase or the unburnt fuel will burn in the checker system of the furnace. Excess fuel can also reduce the glass to an amber color that sharply lowers the visible transmittance of the glass product.


An amber color arises when the iron reacts with sulfur that has been reduced to form iron sulfide. Amber colored glass containers are normally melted in like manner by using anthracite coal together with iron oxide and sulfate. The amber iron sulfide chromophore, once produced, significantly decreases the visible transmittance of the glass and the glass could not be used where a high transmittance is required.


Therefore, there is a need in the glass industry to produce amber free green glass that has high transmittance yet having an improved infrared light absorption and an ultra violet absorption.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect of the present invention a green soda-lime-silica glass having a base and a colorant is provided. The composition of the base comprises 68 to 75% SiO2, 10 to 18 wt. % Na2O, 5 to 15 wt. % CaO, 0 to 10 wt. % MgO, 0 to 5 wt. % Al2O3, and 0 to 5 wt. % K2O, where CaO+MgO is 6 to 15 wt. % and Na2O+K2O is 10 to 20 wt. % is provided. The composition of the colorants comprises: 0.3 to 0.65 wt. % total iron as Fe2O3; wherein the ratio of FeO/total Fe as Fe2O3 is greater than 0.37 but less than 0.65; 0.05 to 0.8 wt. % manganese compound as MnO2.


In yet another aspect of the invention a sufficient amount of reductant is added to the batch to achieve a redox ratio of greater than 0.37. In yet another aspect of the present invention glass products made according to the embodiment of the invention have the following spectral properties at 4.0 mm. thickness: 65 to 81% light transmittance using Illuminant A (LTA) and using Illuminant C has a dominant wavelength greater than 494 but less than or equal to 555 nanometers with an excitation purity greater than 2% and less than 9%. Generally, as the quantities of the colorants increase, both the % LTA and % IR transmittance will go down. Similarly, as the glass thickness increases for a given glass composition, the transmittance of the thicker glass will decrease.


In yet another aspect of the present invention a method of producing a green glass having the above composition is disclosed where the glass has an improved infrared light absorption while maintaining a good visible transmission and, at the same time, achieving good absorption in the ultra violet portion of the spectrum.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following discussion and the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the chromaticity coordinates of the glass of the present invention; and



FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the glass in prior art and the glass of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Flat soda-lime-silica glass, used in the automotive and architectural industries and conveniently made by the float glass process, is generally characterized by the following basic composition, the amounts of the components being based on a weight percentage of the total glass composition:












TABLE I







Base Glass Components
Weight %









SiO2
68 to 75



Al2O3
0 to 5



CaO
 5 to 15



MgO
 0 to 10



Na2O
10 to 18



K2O
0 to 5










The green glass composition of the present invention employs this basic soda-lime-silica glass composition wherein, additionally, CaO+MgO is 6 to 15 wt. % and Na2O+K2O is 10 to 20 wt. %. Preferably, SO3 is present in the range of 0.03 to 0.20 wt. %, more preferably 0.03 to 0.10 wt. %. In addition, the green glass composition consists essentially of the following coloring components: iron oxide; manganese compound; and optionally one of titanium dioxide or cerium oxide or both.


The total iron as Fe2O3 is present in the invention composition in quantities of 0.3 to 0.65 wt. % Fe2O3. Typically, this ingredient is added with the batch ingredients in the oxide form, i.e. Fe2O3. The iron oxide incorporated in the composition lowers both the ultraviolet and the infrared transmittance of the glass products. When iron oxide is used in a glass composition in normal commercial production, the redox ratio defined as equal to FeO/total iron (Fe) as Fe2O3 In commercial glass products available today this redox ratio is in the range of is 0.23–0.26. On the other hand, the glass of the present invention has a higher redox ratio, in the range of 0.37–0.65. If the redox ratio goes above 0.65, the undesirable amber chromophore may form.


The glass of the invention is manufactured by one step batch admixing of the components to feed a conventional Siemens float glass furnace. Sodium sulfate is mixed in the batch together with anthracite coal to shift the iron oxide equilibrium toward the reduced form of iron (FeO). Manganese dioxide is necessary in the batch to prevent the formation of the amber iron sulfide. All of the batch components are mixed together in a single step and then metered into the furnace. In glass product made with this method titanium or cerium oxide improves the ultra violet absorption of the glass. When glass products made in this manner are used in vehicles, the green glass absorbs solar heat and there is relatively less total heat build up in the vehicle. The load on vehicle air conditioners is reduced such that there is less heat build up to cool and comfort to the passengers occurs quickly. Glass made with the instant invention can also be used for architectural products and provides a similar reduction in air conditioner load.


A manganese compound is present in an amount of 0.05 to 0.80 wt. % based on MnO2 in the green glass invention composition to prevent the formation of the amber color. This manganese compound can be added to the batch glass components in a variety forms, e.g., but not limited to MnO2, Mn3O4, MnO, MnCO3, MnSO4, MnF2, MnCl2, etc.


Table II discloses the amounts of raw material batch ingredients that are preferably used to form the embodiments of green glass compositions according to the present invention.












TABLE II







Batch Material
Range Mass (Lbs)









Sand
1000



Soda Ash
290 to 350



Limestone
70 to 90



Dolomite
215 to 260



Salt cake
 5 to 15



Rouge (97% Fe2O3)
3.5 to 8.5



Manganese Dioxide
0.65 to 11.0



Titanium Dioxide
  0 to 14.0



Cerium Oxide
  0 to 14.0



Anthracite coal
  9 to 2.5



Nepheline Syenite
 0 to 150










The anthracite coal is preferably bought under the trade-name CARBOCITE and is commercially available from the Shamokin Filler Company. Graphite could be used as a substitute for anthracite coal in an amount of about 70% that of anthracite coal because anthracite coal contains about 70–72% carbon. If graphite is used, the typical range would be from 0.7 to 2.1 pounds of graphite per 1000 pounds of sand. MELITE, a coal slag processed by Calumite Corporation could partially or wholly substitute for rouge in the batch up to about 55 pounds Melite per 1000 pounds of sand. MELITE has about 80% of the total iron oxide in the reduced form and thus would require less anthracite coal to generate similar spectral properties.


The equilibrium reactions that occur in the glass melt which causes, in the forms of iron oxide are included by the sodium sulfate used as a refining agent and carbon used to react with sodium sulfate at lower furnace temperatures. Generally, increasing the quantity of sodium sulfate in the glass tends to shift the iron oxide equilibrium slightly toward oxidizing, on the other hand, increasing carbon concentration in the glass batch shifts the iron oxide equilibrium toward reducing form of iron. Another influence on the iron oxide equilibrium is the peak furnace temperature which, when increased will shift the iron oxide slightly toward the reduced state and lowering overall furnace temperature allows the iron oxide to shift back towards the oxidized state, thereby obtaining the green color of the present invention.


As illustrated in FIG. 1, the color of the colored glass is defined by the defined by a chromaticity coordinates inside the polygons ABCDA, the chromaticity coordinates are:
















x
y




















A
0.284
0.321



B
0.301
0.317



C
0.307
0.326



D
0.314
0.352










The smaller polygon as shown by reference numeral 12 represents the preferred color space while the larger polygon as shown by reference numeral 10 represents the full scope of the color space of the invention. The colored glass obtained in accordance with the teachings of the present invention exhibits the following spectral properties at 4 mm. control thickness has a light transmittance using illuminant A in a range of 65% to 81%, an infrared transmittance in the range of 10% to 33% and an ultraviolet transmittance in the range of 38% to 60%.


Melts were made in the laboratory which demonstrate embodiments of this invention using the procedure as follows: batches were weighed, placed into a glass jar about 2″ high and 2″ inside diameter and dry mixed for 10 minutes each on a Turbula mixer, dry batch was placed into an 80% platinum/20% rhodium crucible that stands 2″ tall and has an inside diameter at the top of 2.5″ and is tapered to the base which has an inside diameter of 1.75″. An amount of 4.5 ml. of water is added to the dry batch in the crucible and mixed with a metal spoon. After such preparation, a group of six different batches is melted in a gas/air fired surface at the same time for 1 hour at 2600° F. and each crucible is removed in turn from the furnace and fritted. Fritting the glass involves coating the inside of the platinum/rhodium crucible by rolling the molten glass around the inside of the crucible and then plunging the crucible into cold water. After removing the crucible from the water and draining, the broken glass particles are removed from the sides of the crucible and mechanically mixed inside the crucible. All six samples are fritted in like manner and all crucibles are placed back into the furnace for another hour interval at 2600° F. and the fritting procedure is repeated. After the second fritting process, the crucibles are returned to the furnace for 4 hours at 2600° F. Each crucible is removed in turn from the furnace and each molten glass sample is poured into a graphite mold with an inside diameter of 2.5″. Each glass is cooled slowly, labeled, and placed into an annealing furnace where the temperature is quickly raised to 1050° F., held for 2 hours, and then slowly cooled by shutting off the furnace and removing the samples after 14 or more hours. The samples are ground and polished to about 4.0 mm. thickness and subsequently the spectral properties are measured for each sample.


All laboratory melts made with above procedure use a base composition of 100 grams sand, 32.22 grams soda ash, 8.81 grams limestone, 23.09 grams dolomite, 0.5 to 2.0 grams of sodium sulfate, 0.09 to 0.25 grams of CARBOCITE, 2.64 grams of nepheline syenite, and the remainder of the batch includes rouge, manganese dioxide, and titanium dioxide and cerium oxide, if required.


In each of the following tables of examples with the glass composition includes spectral data at 4.0 mm, which is the control thickness. Some tables include thickness other than 4.0 mm. where the most preferred embodiment of the instant invention is with the % LTA greater than or equal to 70% and the TSET is less than or equal to 40%.


Table III below shows the improvement to infrared absorption by increasing anthracite coal and improvement in ultra violet absorption by increasing manganese dioxide (MnO2) at constant Fe2O3. Generally, as the amount of anthracite coal is increased, the infrared absorption increases. On the other hand as the amount of manganese dioxide is increased the ultra violet absorption increases. Glasses made with the same batch concentrations, but without anthracite coal are green and do not have the level of infrared absorption; this would put those glasses outside the scope of this invention. Glasses made without manganese dioxide could develop the amber color and the transmittance is significantly lower.











TABLE III









Example
















1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8



















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Wt. % FeO
0.293
0.308
0.305
0.296
0.298
0.299
0.19
0.203


Redox Ratio
0.586
0.616
0.610
0.592
0.596
0.598
0.380
0.406


Wt. % MnO2
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.15
0.2
0.4
0.8
0.8


Salt Cake*
10
7.5
5
10.04
10
10.5
10
10


Anthracite coal*
2.087
1.816
2
2.004
2.086
2.33
1.908
2.083







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness















% LTA
71.54
68.93
68.83
70.04
70.39
70.21
75.14
75.53


% UV
56.16
47.81
48.77
51.9
52.89
42.58
47.84
50.87


% IR
15.13
13.92
14.16
14.88
14.74
14.57
27.61
25.61


% TSET
40.62
37.74
38.07
39.34
39.57
39.21
48.9
48.2


Dominant
494.2
516.6
509.7
500.3
497.9
495.8
498.5
494.8


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
6
3.5
3.4
4.4
4.9
5.7
3.4
4.4


Chromaticity
0.29316
0.3011
0.2999
0.29674
0.29538
0.29358
0.29999
0.29764


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.32094
0.33382
0.33103
0.32641
0.32467
0.32289
0.32252
0.32026


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness











Thickness in mm.
4.2
3.7
3.7



% LTA
70.7
70.3
70.3


% UV
55.2
49.8
50.7


% IR
14.4
15.9
16.1


% TSET
39.5
39.7
39.8


Dominant
494.2
516.6
509.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
6.3
3.1
3.2





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table IV demonstrates that increasing the iron oxide lowers the transmittance in the visible portion of the spectrum and that the infrared transmittance is lowered as well. Further improvements in ultra violet absorption are observed when MnO2 is increased.











TABLE IV









Example













9
10
11
12
13
















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.55
0.6


Wt. % FeO
0.212
0.244
0.26
0.358
0.358


Redox Ratio
0.606
0.610
0.578
0.651
0.597


Wt. % MnO2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.45


Salt Cake*
10
10
10
10
10


anthracite
2
2.003
2.005
2.224
2.225


coal*







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control thickness












% LTA
75.29
73.21
73.75
67.36
66.91


% UV
57.96
55.71
58.57
50.57
47.87


% IR
24.42
20.19
18.4
10.47
10.52


% TSET
47.2
43.85
43.59
35.86
35.54


Dominant
508.4
504.2
494.2
494.5
495.6


Wavelength


% Excitation
2.5
3.2
5.1
7
6.7


Purity


Chromaticity
0.30259
0.30024
0.29564
0.29009
0.29083


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.32641
0.32661
0.32026
0.32229
0.32365


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness












Thickness in
5.5
4.8
4.8
3.4
3.4


mm.


% LTA
70.1
70.07
70.7
70.46
70.05


% UV
50.7
51.5
54.81
54.24
51.72


% IR
15.6
15.19
13.62
14.19
14.25


% TSET
39.5
39.41
39.36
39.53
39.26


Dominant
508.3
504.2
494.2
494.5
495.6


Wavelength


% Excitation
3.4
3.8
6.1
6
5.7


Purity





pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table V shows that the ultra violet absorption can be improved by the addition of cerium oxide to the batch mixture of iron oxide, manganese dioxide, salt cake and anthracite coal that contains about 70 to 72% carbon as the active reducing material. Increasing the cerium oxide helps to oxidize the iron oxide and that increases the transmittance in the visible portion of the spectrum and that is critical when the finished glass product is to be used in automotive applications.












TABLE V





Example
14
15
16


















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.5
0.5
0.5


Wt. % FeO
0.322
0.299
0.303


Redox Ratio
0.644
0.598
0.606


Wt. % MnO2
0.3
0.05
0.2


Wt. % CeO2
0.1
0.2
0.5


Salt Cake*
10.5
10
10.5


Anthracite Coal*
1.752
2
2.334


Spectral Properties @ 4.0


mm. control thickness


% LTA
66.73
70.56
69.43


% UV
41.31
47.56
39.69


% IR
12.88
14.66
14.26


% TSET
36.01
39.51
38.13


Dominant Wavelength
516.5
496.6
508.2


% Excitation Purity
3.6
5.3
3.5


Chromaticity Coor. x
0.30056
0.29457
0.29924


Chromaticity Coor y
0.33475
0.32356
0.33083


Most Preferred Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness


Thickness in mm.


3.85


% LTA


70.14


% UV


40.51


% IR


15.22


% TSET


39.04


Dominant Wavelength


508.2


% Excitation Purity


3.5





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table VI below indicates the impact of titanium dioxide on glass compositions to improve the ultra violet absorption of the glass composition while the concentration of iron oxide and manganese dioxide are kept constant. Table VI also demonstrates the impact from a small increase in the reductant, anthracite coal. Example 19 has essentially the same composition as Example 18 but with the anthracite coal increased from 2.0 to 2.2 pounds per 1000 pounds sand and as seen all of the spectral properties are lowered. Example 21 shows the same effect compared to that of Example 20 as the anthracite coal is increased from 2.0 to 2.2 pounds per 1000 pounds of sand. Examples 18, 20, 22 and 23 clearly show the improvement in ultra violet absorption when all other components of the composition are constant.











TABLE VI









Example















17
18
19
20
21
22
23


















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45


Wt. % FeO
0.277
0.26
0.279
0.246
0.283
0.258
0.263


Redox Ratio
0.616
0.578
0.620
0.547
0.629
0.573
0.584


Wt. % MnO2
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


Wt. % TiO2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6


Salt Cake*
10.07
10
10.02
10
10.003
10.02
10.05


Anthracite coal*
2.206
2.003
2.2
2.004
2.2
2.004
2.004







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness














% LTA
70.25
73.23
68.66
73.75
68.16
71.75
70.95


% UV
47.7
54.82
40.79
51.91
39.4
48.38
44.72


% IR
16.62
18.31
16.41
19.88
16.01
18.53
17.97


% TSET
39.84
43.13
38.2
44.17
37.84
42.23
41.19


Dominant
528.7
494.7
554.2
494.9
551.6
498.9
507.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
3.7
5.2
8.4
4.9
7.6
4.1
3.1


Chromaticity
0.304
0.2951
0.3119
0.2960
0.3103
0.2978
0.3006


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.3345
0.321
0.3456
0.3209
0.3439
0.3242
0.3286


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness














Thickness in mm.

4.8

4.8

4.4
4.2


% LTA

70.12

70.7

70.1
70


% UV

50.73

47.64

46.1
43.4


% IR

13.55

14.91

16.13
16.8


% TSET

38.86

39.83

40
39.8


Dominant

494.7

494.9

498.9
507.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity

6.2
5.8
4.5
3.2





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table VII indicates the improvements that titanium dioxide makes to glass compositions of the instant invention. Titanium dioxide has been shown to be effective in improving the ultra violet absorption but it is also shown in Table VII to increase the dominant wavelength. The dominant wavelength and excitation purity are important because they define the color of the glass. Products that follow the teachings of the instant invention can vary in thickness from 1.5 to about 8.0 mm. and can be used in architectural as well as automotive applications. Automotive applications include laminated products such as windshields.











TABLE VII









Example
















24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31



















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Wt. % FeO
0.295
0.201
0.304
0.299
0.247
0.297
0.293
0.233


Redox Ratio
0.590
0.402
0.608
0.598
0.494
0.594
0.586
0.466


Wt. % MnO2
0.05
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.15
0.45
0.2


Wt. % TiO2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.8


Salt Cake*
10
10
10.5
10.5
10
10
10
10


anthracite coal*
2
1.905
2.1
2.105
1.905
2.203
2.222
1.903







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness















% LTA
70.96
75.93
68.74
69.29
73.49
69.56
69.57
73.1


% UV
53
41.68
43.66
44.6
49.92
45.15
42.52
41.65


% IR
15.01
25.99
14.17
14.66
19.73
14.87
15.06
21.4


% TSET
40.07
48.32
37.79
38.35
43.96
38.81
38.79
44.03


Dominant
496.2
494.8
510.5
511.7
494.4
505.2
506.2
507.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
5.4
4.2
3.5
3.4
5.1
3.7
3.7
2.9


Chromaticity
0.2944
0.2981
0.2996
0.3002
0.2955
0.2988
0.2988
0.3010


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.3303
0.3200
0.3319
0.3318
0.3205
0.3289
0.3297
0.3275


Coor y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness















Thickness in mm.
4.1
5.7
3.6
3.85
4.8
3.85
3.85
4.7


% LTA
70.5
70.2
70.7
70
70.4
70.27
70.28
70.3


% UV
52.4
34.8
46.4
45.6
45.59
46.14
43.54
37.4


% IR
14.4
16
18.46
15.64
14.79
15.86
16.05
16.9


% TSET
39.6
40
40
39.28
39.62
39.74
39.72
39.9


Dominant
496.2
494.7
510.5
511.7
494.4
505.2
506.2
507.6


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
5.6
5.9
3.2
3.3
6.1
3.6
3.6
3.3





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table VIII below indicates the improvements that can be achieved in ultra violet absorption that cerium oxide and titanium dioxide make when used in combination. Table VIII further demonstrates the effect that manganese dioxide has on the ultra violet absorption.











TABLE VIII









Example















32
33
34
35
36
37
38


















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Wt. % FeO
0.234
0.271
0.237
0.283
0.285
0.272
0.29


Redox Ratio
0.468
0.542
0.474
0.566
0.570
0.544
0.580


Wt. % MnO2
0.2
0.45
0.2
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.06


Wt % CeO2
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.5


Wt. % TiO2
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.1


Salt Cake*
10
10.5
10
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5


anthracite coal*
1.903
2.096
1.903
2.107
2.336
2.1
2.106







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness














% LTA
73.8
71.14
73.67
71.16
71.16
72.3
71.09


% UV
40.04
39.77
40.69
43.32
42.4
43.43
43.53


% IR
21.37
17.23
20.97
15.97
15.86
17.14
15.36


% TSET
44.45
40.89
44.39
40.42
40.37
41.76
40.22


Dominant
501
499.3
496.2
496.1
496
494.2
494.2


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
3.5
4.4
4.5
5.4
5.4
5.8
7.1


Chromaticity
0.2994
0.2968
0.2970
0.2945
0.2944
0.2936
0.2932


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.3249
0.3253
0.3219
0.3229
0.3228
0.3207
0.3208


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness














Thickness in mm.
5
4.2
4.8
4.2
4.2
4.6
4.2


% LTA
70
70.3
70.6
70.4
70.3
70
70.3


% UV
34.77
38.6
36.74
41.2
41.4
40.4
42.6


% IR
15.17
16
15.88
14.8
14.7
13.7
14.3


% TSET
39.01
39.9
39.99
39.1
39.4
38.6
39


Dominant
500.9
499.3
496.1
496.1
496
494.2
494.2


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
4.4
4.7
5.3
5.7
5.2
6.6
6.3





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table IX shows that MELITE, fly ash from coal burning furnaces marketed by the Calumite Company can substitute for a portion of the anthracite coal and acts as a reductant. Low salt cake is desirable because excess salt cake can contribute to SOx emissions from the furnace. There is another advantage to lower salt cake because that allows less anthracite coal to be used and therefore providing commercial advantages. There is a tramp amount of titanium dioxide in commercial sand sources that adds about 0.01 to 0.05 wt. % TiO2 to any of the glass compositions. Note the similarities in spectral properties of the preferred embodiments of Example 39 with cerium oxide to those of Example 44 with titanium dioxide. The two examples have nominally the same spectral properties at different thickness.











TABLE IX









Example














39
40
41
42
43
44

















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.5
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45


Wt. % FeO
0.318
0.241
0.251
0.247
0.235
0.268


Redox Ratio
0.636
0.536
0.558
0.549
0.522
0.596


Wt. % MnO2
0.1
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


Wt. % CeO2
0.3


Wt. % TiO2

0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4


Salt Cake.*
10.5
2.5
2.502
7.5
7.5
7.5


anthracite coal*
1.754
1.3
1.604
1.702
1.802
1.904


Melite*
34.3







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness













% LTA
67.83
74.74
73.69
73.96
74.23
71.72


% UV
41.98
53.79
52.89
52.8
52.94
48.83


% IR
13.13
20.59
19.31
19.76
21.1
17.5


% TSET
37.04
45.15
43.86
44.26
45.16
41.48


Dominant
501
494.2
494.7
494.4
494.1
502.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
4.7
5
5.1
5.1
5
3.7


Chromaticity
0.29586
0.29596
0.28553
0.29557
0.29593
0.29885


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.32785
0.32012
0.3208
0.32051
0.31998
0.32686


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness













Thickness
3.6
5
4.8
5
5
4.4


in mm.


% LTA
70
71.13
70.64
70.21
70.52
70


% UV
44.3
48.67
48.64
47.58
47.78
46.5


% IR
15.7
14.5
14.41
13.79
14.94
15.2


% TSET
39.5
39.91
39.56
39.01
39.84
39.3


Dominant
501
494.2
494.6
494.4
494.1
502.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
4.2
6.2
6.1
6.3
6.2
4





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table X demonstrates the effect of increasing anthracite coal (CARBOCITE) and maintaining the other components constant. The stepped infrared absorption improvement is readily shown in Examples 45 through 52 as well as the effect that CARBOCITE has to lower the visible transmittance and increase the ultra violet transmittance.











TABLE X









Example
















45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52



















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45


Wt. % FeO
0.168
0.188
0.186
0.199
0.216
0.231
0.25
0.255


Redox Ratio
0.373
0.418
0.413
0.442
0.480
0.513
0.556
0.567


Wt. % MnO2
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


Wt. % TiO2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4


Salt Cake*
5.007
5
5.003
5.004
5
5.002
5
5


anthracite coal*
0.9
1.104
1.2
1.303
1.4
1.5
1.601
1.704







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness















% LTA
77.65
76.7
77.13
76.1
75.5
74.54
73.25
72.93


% UV
49.06
50.06
52.06
51.84
52.85
52.2
51.36
51.03


% IR
31.65
28.03
28.47
26.23
23.76
21.72
19.45
18.86


% TSET
52.21
49.91
50.46
48.79
47.22
45.63
43.73
43.13


Dominant
499.6
497.3
496.5
495.4
494.5
494.4
494.7
496.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
2.8
3.4
3.5
3.9
4.4
4.8
5
4.5


Chromaticity
0.30168
0.30004
0.29995
0.29876
0.29915
0.29657
0.29587
0.29685


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.32225
0.32154
0.32091
0.3205
0.32325
0.32016
0.32075
0.32259


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness














Thickness in mm.
6
6.2
5.8
5.6
5.2
4.8
4.6


% LTA
70.33
70.4
70.2
70.1
70.2
70.13
70.6


% UV
40.36
41.8
43.2
45.1
46.1
47.06
47.7


% IR
16.01
15.5
15.5
14.5
14.6
14.54
15.2


% TSET
39.98
39.8
39.8
39.3
39.5
39.39
39.9


Dominant
497.2
496.3
495.3
494.5
494.3
494.7
496.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
5.1
5.4
5.6
6.1
6.3
5.9
5.2





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






All of the examples are made using the batch only with no cullet (the broken pieces of glass that are added to the batch feed in production). There are two types of cullet that can be added to the batch to produce glass of the invention: reduced iron glass from glass of the invention and oxidized iron glass. The reduced iron glass cullet has a redox ratio of about 0.5 to 0.6 while the oxidized iron glass has a redox ratio of about 0.25. The redox ratio is defined as the ratio of wt. % FeO/total Fe as wt. % Fe2O3. For example, if the desired glass of the invention in the examples above uses 2 pounds of anthracite coal for 1000 pounds of sand, then an additional 1.5 pounds of anthracite coal must be added to the batch when the reduced iron glass cullet is added to make 50% of the batch feed to the furnace for a total of 3.5 pounds of anthracite coal per 1000 pounds of sand. For other cullet levels, the anthracite coal is increased or decreased proportionately. If the oxidized iron glass cullet is used, more anthracite coal must be added to drive the oxidized cullet toward the reduced iron green color. For example, if the desired glass of the invention in the examples above uses 2 pounds of anthracite coal for 1000 pounds of sand, then an additional 2.5 pounds of anthracite coal must be added to the batch when the oxidized iron glass cullet is added to make 50% of the batch feed to the furnace for a total of 4.5 pounds of anthracite coal per 1000 pounds of sand.











TABLE XI









Example















53
54
55
56
57
58
59


















Wt. % Fe2O3
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45


Wt. % FeO
0.173
0.195
0.222
0.244
0.178
0.182
0.208


Redox Ratio
0.384
0.433
0.493
0.542
0.396
0.404
0.462


Wt. % MnO2
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


Wt. % TiO2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5


Salt Cake*
5
5
5
5
5
5
5


anthracite coal*
1.008
1.251
1.501
1.703
1
1.112
1.252







Spectral Properties @ 4.0 mm. control


thickness














% LTA
77.41
75.03
75.2
73.58
76.32
75.96
74.92


% UV
53.47
51.89
52.86
52.22
49.32
49.01
49.59


% IR
30.8
26.83
22.88
20.08
29.9
29.1
24.88


% TSET
51.97
48.68
46.58
44.28
50.7
50.07
47.37


Dominant
495.3
495.3
494.2
494.2
500.5
501
497.7


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
3.4
3.7
4.7
5.1
2.7
2.7
3.5


Chromaticity
0.30018
0.29942
0.29677
0.29559
0.30195
0.30202
0.29958


Coor. x


Chromaticity
0.31986
0.32018
0.31993
0.32018
0.32259
0.32285
0.32209


Coor. y







Most Preferred Embodiment of Invention Spectral Properties @


indicated thickness










Thickness in mm.
4.8

5.4


% LTA
70.51

70


% UV
47.96

42.4


% IR
15.08

16.4


% TSET
39.94

40


Dominant
494.1

497.6


Wavelength


% Excitation Purity
6.1

4.8





*pounds per 1000 pounds sand






Table XI above shows that the anthracite coal has the same affect as in Table X when titanium dioxide is added to the glass composition. Another important feature of the instant invention is that glass of the invention uses only 0.30 to 0.65 wt. % total iron oxide while the prior art green glass contains 0.5 to 0.95 wt. % total iron oxide.


As can be seen from the examples above, the glass in accordance with the present invention provides for high transmittance, an improved infrared light absorption and an improved ultra violet absorption. Further, the use of anthracite coal and magnesium dioxide shifts the iron oxide equilibrium towards the reduced form of iron (FeO). Manganese oxide also prevents excessive reduction of sulfate to form iron sulfide that is amber in color and will decrease the transmittance of the glass.



FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of the chromatographic coordinates of the present glass shown by circles taken from the examples above when compared to the prior commercially available glass. As seen in the Figure, the glass of the present invention is greener than the glass in the prior available products represented by reference numerals 110, 112 and 114.


As any person skilled in the art will recognize from the previous description and from the figures and claims, modifications and changes can be made to the preferred embodiment of the invention without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A colored glass for use in a motor vehicle having a base and a colorant, wherein composition of the colorant by weight of the colored glass consists essentially of: 0.3 to 0.65 wt. % of total iron as Fe2O3, wherein ratio of FeO to total iron as Fe2O3 is in a range of 0.37 to 0.65;0.05 to 0.8 wt. % of manganese oxide as MnO2; andwherein the colored glass at 4 mm. control thickness has a light transmittance using illuminant A in a range of 65% to 81%, an infrared transmittance in the range of 10% to 32%, an ultraviolet transmittance in the range of 39% to 60%, an excitation purity in a range of 2% to 9%, and a dominant wavelength using illuminant C in a range of 494 to 555 nanometers.
  • 2. The colored glass of claim 1, wherein the colorant further comprises up to 1 wt. % titanium oxide as TiO2.
  • 3. The colored glass of claim 2, wherein the amount of titanium oxide is in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 wt. %.
  • 4. The colored glass of claim 1, wherein the colorant further comprises up to 1 wt. % cerium oxide as CeO2.
  • 5. The colored glass of claim 4, wherein the amount of cerium oxide is in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 wt. %.
  • 6. The colored glass of claim 1, wherein the amount of total iron expressed as Fe2O3 is in the range of 0.4 to 0.6 wt. %.
  • 7. The colored glass of claim 1, wherein the amount of manganese oxide as MnO2 is in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 wt. %.
  • 8. A colored glass for use in a motor vehicle having a base and a colorant, wherein composition of the colorant by weight of the colored glass comprising: 0.3 to 0.65 wt. % of total iron as Fe2O3, wherein ratio of FeO to total iron as Fe2O3 is in a range of 0.37 to 0.65;0.05 to 0.8 wt. % of manganese oxide as MnO2; andwherein the colored glass at 4 mm. control thickness has a light transmittance using illuminant A in a range of 65% to 81%, an infrared transmittance in the range of 10% to 32%, an ultraviolet transmittance in the range of 39% to 60%, an excitation purity in a range of 2% to 9%, and a dominant wavelength using illuminant C in a range of 494 to 555 nanometers;wherein a color of the colored glass is defined by a chromatography coordinates inside the polygon ABCDA, wherein the chromaticity coordinates are:
  • 9. The colored glass of claim 8, wherein the preferred chromaticity coordinates inside the polygon ABCDA are:
  • 10. The colored glass of claim 8, wherein the color defined inside the polygon ABCDA is green.
  • 11. The colored glass of claim 1, wherein the dominant wavelength in the range of 496 to 520 nanometers.
  • 12. The colored glass of claim 1, wherein the composition of the base by weight of the colored glass is: 68 to 75 wt. % SiO2; 10 to 18 wt. % Na2O;5 to 15 wt. % CaO;0 to 10 wt. % MgO;0 to 5 wt. % Al2O3; and0 to 5 wt. % K2O;wherein the total amount of CaO and MgO is in a range of 6 to 15 wt. % and the total amount of Na2O and K2O is in a range of 10 to 20 wt. %.
US Referenced Citations (81)
Number Name Date Kind
1961603 Berger et al. Jun 1934 A
2505001 Nordberg Apr 1950 A
3343935 Keefer et al. Sep 1967 A
3345190 Albinak et al. Oct 1967 A
3486874 Rough Dec 1969 A
3578430 Labrot May 1971 A
3779733 Janakirama-Rao Dec 1973 A
3951635 Rough, Sr. Apr 1976 A
3971646 Rhodes Jul 1976 A
4104076 Pons Aug 1978 A
4381934 Kunkle et al. May 1983 A
4493557 Nayak et al. Jan 1985 A
4519814 Demarest, Jr. May 1985 A
4529428 Groetzinger Jul 1985 A
4539034 Hanneken Sep 1985 A
4610711 Matesa et al. Sep 1986 A
4701425 Baker et al. Oct 1987 A
4738938 Kunkle et al. Apr 1988 A
4792536 Pecoraro et al. Dec 1988 A
4866010 Boulos et al. Sep 1989 A
5013487 Cheng May 1991 A
5077133 Cheng Dec 1991 A
5112778 Cheng et al. May 1992 A
5214008 Beckwith et al. May 1993 A
5240886 Gulotta et al. Aug 1993 A
5308805 Baker et al. May 1994 A
5318931 Nakaguchi et al. Jun 1994 A
5320986 Taniguchi et al. Jun 1994 A
5344798 Morimoto et al. Sep 1994 A
5346867 Jones et al. Sep 1994 A
5352640 Combes et al. Oct 1994 A
5362689 Morimoto et al. Nov 1994 A
5385872 Gulotta et al. Jan 1995 A
5393593 Gulotta et al. Feb 1995 A
5411922 Jones May 1995 A
5478783 Higby et al. Dec 1995 A
5521128 Jones et al. May 1996 A
5523263 Penrod Jun 1996 A
5558942 Itoh et al. Sep 1996 A
5582455 Casariego et al. Dec 1996 A
5593929 Krumwiede et al. Jan 1997 A
5610107 Danielson et al. Mar 1997 A
5641716 Higby et al. Jun 1997 A
5688727 Shelestak et al. Nov 1997 A
5700579 Jeanvoine et al. Dec 1997 A
5723390 Kijima et al. Mar 1998 A
5726109 Ito et al. Mar 1998 A
5747398 Higby et al. May 1998 A
5776845 Boulos et al. Jul 1998 A
5776846 Sakaguchi et al. Jul 1998 A
5780372 Higby Jul 1998 A
5807417 Boulos et al. Sep 1998 A
5830812 Shelestak et al. Nov 1998 A
5851940 Boulos et al. Dec 1998 A
5858894 Nagashima et al. Jan 1999 A
5877102 Dupont et al. Mar 1999 A
5877103 Dupont et al. Mar 1999 A
5888917 Kawaguchi et al. Mar 1999 A
5897956 Kijima et al. Apr 1999 A
5908794 Maeda et al. Jun 1999 A
5932502 Longobardo et al. Aug 1999 A
5952255 Seto et al. Sep 1999 A
5977002 Boulos et al. Nov 1999 A
5985780 Casariego et al. Nov 1999 A
6017837 Nagashima et al. Jan 2000 A
6046122 Nagashima et al. Apr 2000 A
6071840 Sasage et al. Jun 2000 A
6103650 Krumwiede Aug 2000 A
6150028 Mazon Nov 2000 A
6218323 Bretschneider et al. Apr 2001 B1
RE37328 Pecoraro et al. Aug 2001 E
6313052 Nakashima et al. Nov 2001 B1
6313053 Shelestak Nov 2001 B1
6596660 Boulos et al. Jul 2003 B1
6624102 Seto et al. Sep 2003 B1
6821918 Boulos et al. Nov 2004 B1
20010018393 Nagashima et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010021685 Sakaguchi et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010034295 Seto et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020025899 Higby et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020058579 Seto et al. May 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
0 555 552 Aug 1993 EP
677492 Oct 1995 EP
0 527 487 Nov 1996 EP
0 996 598 Apr 2001 EP
60-215546 Oct 1985 JP
61-136936 Jun 1986 JP
2002348143 Dec 2002 JP
WO 9516641 Jun 1995 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040067836 A1 Apr 2004 US