Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6621461
-
Patent Number
6,621,461
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, August 9, 200024 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, September 16, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 343 781 R
- 343 781 P
- 343 781 CA
- 343 909
- 343 753
- 343 756
- 343 DIG 2
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A method for broadcasting, a signal, and an antenna system are disclosed. The antenna system comprises a feed horn and a reflector. The feed horn provides a radio frequency (RF) signal. The reflector is aligned with the feed horn and is illuminated by the feed horn, and comprises a reflective grid. The reflective grid lines are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system. A method in accordance with the present invention comprises illuminating a reflector with an RF signal emanating from a feed horn, the feed horn being substantially located at a focal point of the reflector, wherein the reflector comprises a reflective grid, and reflecting the RF signal with the reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates in general to antenna systems, and in particular to a gridded reflector antenna system.
2. Description of Related Art
Communications satellites have become commonplace for use in many types of communications services, e.g., data transfer, voice communications, television spot beam coverage, and other data transfer applications. As such, satellites must provide signals to various geographic locations on the Earth's surface. As such, typical satellites use customized antenna designs to provide signal coverage for a particular country or geographic area.
In order to provide good cross-polarization performance over the geographic region of interest, a shaped dual reflector geometry is often used. The subreflector and/or main reflector is shaped to generate a beam pattern that covers the intended coverage geographic region.
An advantage of dual reflector designs is that the main reflector is thin and therefore generally easy to package and stow in the confines of the launch vehicle volume constraints. A typical dual reflector antenna system can provide one beam for each of two linear polarizations. However, typical dual reflector antenna systems have a main reflector that has only one solid surface, and therefore can generate only one distinct beam shape.
Alternately, a “dual-gridded” shaped reflector system may be used to produce beams over the desired coverage area. This type of antenna system is a shared aperture system having two separate reflective surfaces, one reflective surface for each polarization. Each reflective surface, also called grids, maybe shaped to produce a distinct beam shape for each polarization.
The related art shapes the grid pattern surface geometry, e.g., places undulating waves and/or distorts the grid surface in the z-direction to shape the beam to the desired size and/or location. Further, the related art moves the feed horn location to again move the beam location or change the beam size. The related art requires for a single reflector with two feed horns of opposite polarizations, the focal points of each grid must be separated to provide adequate cross-polarization performance. The resulting reflector shell becomes large and thick, and therefore difficult to package and stow within the confines of the launch vehicle constraints. The use of multiple antennas can also produce multiple beam patterns, however, multiple antennas within a system also produce space and deployment problems for the satellite and make it difficult to design the satellite to fit within the launch vehicle volume constraints. Further, each satellite must have a custom designed feed horn location and/or a custom shaped reflector to enable the satellite to deliver the desired beam pattern and locations.
It can be seen, then, that there is a need in the art for antenna reflectors that provide multiple distinctly shaped beams. It can also be seen that there is a need in the art for antenna systems that provide distinctly shaped beams for multiple polarizations that are easy to stow within launch vehicle constraints. It can also be seen that there is a need in the art for antenna systems that can deliver a desired beam pattern and location without having to custom design each reflector geometry, e.g., nominal focal axis of the reflector, and feed horn location.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To overcome the limitations in the prior art described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses a method for broadcasting, a signal, and an antenna system. The antenna system comprises a feed horn and a reflector. The feed horn provides a radio frequency (RF) signal. The reflector is aligned with the feed horn and is illuminated by the feed horn, and comprises a reflective grid. The reflective grid lines are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system.
A method in accordance with the present invention comprises illuminating a reflector with RF energy emanating from a feed horn, the feed horn being substantially located at a focal point of the reflector, wherein the reflector comprises a reflective grid, and reflecting the RF energy with the reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system.
The present invention provides an antenna system that provides distinctly shaped beams that are easy to stow within launch vehicle constraints. The present invention also provides an antenna system that provides distinctly shaped beams for multiple polarizations that are easy to stow within launch vehicle constraints. The present invention also provides antenna systems that can deliver a desired beam pattern and location without having to custom design each reflector reflector geometry, e.g., nominal focal axis of the reflector, and feed horn location.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
FIGS. 1A and 1B
illustrate a typical satellite environment for the present invention;
FIG. 2
illustrates front and side views of a typical reflector system for satellite communications;
FIG. 3A
illustrates the grids of a related art reflector;
FIG. 3B
illustrates a typical grid design of the present invention;
FIG. 4
illustrates a beam design with the boresight within the designed geographic coverage area;
FIG. 5
illustrates the co-polar performance of an antenna system described with respect to
FIG. 4
;
FIG. 6
illustrates a beam design with the boresight outside of the designed geographic coverage area;
FIG. 7
illustrates the co-polar performance of an antenna system described with respect to
FIG. 6
;
FIG. 8
illustrates the cross-polarization characteristics of a system with the boresight substantially within the coverage area;
FIG. 9
illustrates the cross-polarization characteristics of a system with the boresight outside of the coverage area;
FIG. 10
illustrates the cross-polarization characteristics of a system utilizing the grid patterns of the present invention, with the boresight outside of the coverage area; and
FIG. 11
is a flow chart illustrating the steps used to practice the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Satellite Environment
FIGS. 1A and 1B
illustrate a typical satellite environment for the present invention.
Spacecraft
100
is illustrated with four antennas
102
-
108
. Although shown as dual reflector antennas
102
-
108
, antennas
102
-
108
can be direct fed single reflector antennas
102
-
108
without departing from the scope of the present invention. Antenna
102
is located on the east face of the spacecraft bus
110
, antenna
104
is located on the west face of spacecraft bus
110
, antenna
106
is located on the north part of the nadir face of the spacecraft bus
110
, and antenna
108
is located on the south part of the nadir face of the spacecraft bus
110
. Solar panels
112
are also shown for clarity.
Feed horns
114
-
120
are also shown. Feed horn
114
illuminates antenna
102
, feed horn
116
illuminates antenna
104
, feed horn
118
illuminates antenna
108
, and feed horn
120
illuminates antenna
106
. Feed horn
114
is directed towards subreflector
122
, which is aligned with antenna
102
. Feed horn
116
is directed towards subreflector
124
, which is aligned with antenna
104
. Feed horns
114
-
120
can be single or multiple sets of feed horns as desired by the spacecraft designer or as needed to produce the beams desired for geographic coverage. For example, feed horns
114
and
116
are shown as two banks of feed horns, but could be a single bank of feed horns, or multiple banks of feed horns, as desired. Antennas
102
and
104
are shown in a side-fed offset Cassegrain (SFOC) configuration, which are packaged on the East and West sides of the spacecraft bus
110
. Antennas
106
and
108
are shown as offset Gregorian geometry antennas, but can be of other geometric design if desired. Further, antennas
102
-
108
can be of direct fed design, where the subreflectors are eliminated and the feed horns
114
-
120
directly illuminate reflectors
102
-
108
if desired. Further, any combination of Cassegrainian, Gregorian, SFOC, or direct illumination designs can be incorporated on spacecraft
100
without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Feed horn
118
illuminates subreflector
130
with RF energy, which is aligned with antenna
108
to produce output beam
132
. Feed horn
120
illuminates subreflector
134
with RF energy, which is aligned with antenna
106
to produce beam
136
. Beams
132
and
136
are used to produce coverage patterns on the Earth's surface. Beams
132
and
136
can cover the same geographic location, or different geographic locations, as desired. Further, feed horns
118
and
120
can illuminate the antennas
102
-
108
with more than one polarization of RF energy, i.e., left and right hand circular polarization, or horizontal and vertical polarization, simultaneously.
Although described with respect to satellite installations, the antennas described herein can be used in alternative embodiments, e.g., ground based systems, mobile based systems, etc., without departing from the scope of the present invention. Further, although the spacecraft
100
is described such that the feed horns
114
-
120
provide a transmitted signal from spacecraft
100
via the reflectors
102
-
108
, the feed horns
114
-
120
can be diplexed such that signals can be received on the spacecraft
100
via reflectors
102
-
108
.
Overview of the Present Invention
Current day satellites use frequency reuse in order to increase the capacity of satellites. One approach to achieve larger capacity for a satellite is by using the same frequency and orthogonal polarizations for that frequency, e.g., vertical and horizontal polarizations for a linearly polarized system, to achieve additional throughput for the satellite communications system.
Typical satellites use a parabolic shaped reflector
102
at the beginning of the design process, and place the feed horn
114
along the focal axis of the parabolic shaped reflector
102
, typically at the focal point of the parabolic reflector
102
. The reflector
102
and feed horn
114
are then moved to provide a proper pointing of the beam to be emitted from the parabolic reflector
102
. As such, the feed horn
114
can be placed at various places with respect to the spacecraft bus. The reflector
102
surface is then shaped to provide a beam pattern of desired shape, and gridded surfaces are then added along the shaped reflector. The gridded surfaces are applied to the shaped surface such that, in the related art, the grid lines are parallel as seen from the focal axis of the reflector
102
, e.g., from the position of the feed horn
114
.
When a satellite uses a common reflector system with multiple grids for orthogonally polarized signals, each signal is impingent upon both reflective grids of the reflector, which results in reflections of both polarizations from each reflective surface. Since each reflective surface is designed to reflect only one of the two orthogonal signals, the unwanted reflection, e.g., from the other or “cross-polarization” signal for that gridded surface, must be small for the overall system to operate efficiently. This small cross-polarization reflection characteristic is difficult to achieve.
The antenna configuration which is primarily used in many satellites is the dual gridded reflector. With a dual gridded reflector approach, good polarization purities, i.e., low cross-polarization characteristics for each gridded reflector, are obtained by gridding the surfaces of the dual gridded reflector with conducting grids. The two reflecting surfaces are gadded in two orthogonal directions, although in some designs, only the front surface is gridded with a reflective grid. The direction of the grid(s) control the polarization characteristics of the antenna in both the desired polarization (“co-polarization characteristics”) and the undesired polarization (“cross-polarization characteristics”).
Each surface (grid) of the dual-gridded reflector with the associated feed horn or feed horn array can be designed to produce a shaped beam of any size and location. Since there are two reflective surfaces on each reflector, two shaped beams can be produced from a single dual gridded reflector, each operating in one of the two orthogonal polarizations. Each surface can be either a shaped reflector fed by a single feed or a parabolic reflector fed by a feed array. The beams can be designed to be in any arbitrary direction with reference to the focal axis, i.e., the direction of focal axis can be either within the coverage area or outside the coverage area.
Off-axis beams can be generated from a paraboloid shaped reflector by using a feed horn array located away from the focus of the paraboloid shaped reflector. In a shaped reflector the off-axis beams can be generated by suitably shaping the reflector. This approach has significant mechanical advantage since the feed reflector geometry remains essentially the same for many different shaped beams.
The cross-polar performance of the reflector is controlled by the shape of the grids, because the grids generally support the currents in only one direction. The present invention involves shaping the grids in such a way to improve the cross-polar performance of the reflector by orienting the grids with respect to the desired beam pattern, as opposed to orienting the grids with respect to the feed location, e.g., locating the feed horn along the nominal focal axis of the reflector, as in the related art. This more optimal grid direction depends on the direction of the shaped beams with reference to the antenna geometry, as opposed to having a grid direction that is seen as parallel as seen from the nominal axis of the reflector.
Reflector Design
FIG. 2
illustrates front and side views of a typical reflector system for satellite communications.
System
200
shows a reflector
202
and a feed horn
204
directed at the reflector
202
. The focal point
206
of the reflector
202
is primarily responsible for the direction of the beam that emanates from the reflector
202
. Reflector
202
is similar to reflectors
102
-
108
described in
FIGS. 1A and 1B
.
Reflector
202
typically has a five inch depth at the bottom of reflector
202
as shown by the dimensions
208
and
210
. Typical width dimension
212
and feed horn
202
locations
214
and
216
are shown.
FIG. 3A
illustrates the grids of a related art reflector.
Grid
300
is shown as one of the reflective surfaces for reflector
202
. Another grid which is substantially orthogonal to grid
300
is also present on reflectors
202
that have dual gridded surfaces. In present day dual gridded reflectors
202
, the grids
300
are designed such that the grids
300
on a single surface look parallel as seen along the focal axis of the paraboloid, e.g., as viewed along a normal axis emanating from focal point
206
. Such grids provide inferior cross-polar performance when the reflector is being illuminated by a feed horn
204
that is located away from the focal axis, also known as an off-axis beam or off-axis geometry. As such, the grid
300
has an increased cross-polarization characteristic, which degrades the quality of the signal for each of the polarizations and requires additional design time to properly design the antenna system
100
. Additional time must be spent optimizing the grid
300
design, and additional time must be spent determining the proper feed horn
204
location, since locations
214
and
216
typically cannot provide the proper cross-polarization performance characteristics for a given feed horn
204
. As such, each satellite design, and therefore each system
200
design, is unique, and typically cannot be used on another satellite mission.
The present invention, which shapes the grid
300
lines in a different direction based on the desired geographic beam location, results in improved cross-polar performance for off-axis beams in comparison to the approach shown in FIG.
3
A. In applications in which the front and back grids
300
on reflector
202
generate beams that will be impingent on different geographic locations, e.g., the front grid
300
beam will be impingent upon geographic locations in the southwestern United States, whereas the beam impingent upon the rear grid
300
will be impingent upon geographic locations in the northeastern United States, the present invention allows the designer to choose a more optimum grid direction for each grid, and therefore for each beam, which results in better cross-polar performance for both beams.
FIG. 3B
illustrates a typical grid design of the present invention. System
302
now employs a non-parallel grid
304
as seen from the focal axis of the reflector
202
, for one or more of the reflective surfaces for reflector
202
. Grid
304
can now allow designers to leave feed horn
204
at either position
214
or
216
for a variety of mission objectives, and leave reflector
202
as a standard shape and size, while still providing a desired beam shape and size. The non-parallel grid
304
of the present invention allows the grid to have a “parallel” viewpoint as seen from the geographic location of the desired beam that emanates from system
302
, not a “parallel” viewpoint as viewed from an axis emanating from focal point
206
. Although shown as curved lines, non-parallel grid
304
can also be a grid of substantially parallel straight lines that is rotated through any angle with respect to the focal point
206
, can have different spacings between the grid
304
lines, comprise a free form array of grid lines, or any combination of spacing differences and/or nonlinearities to achieve the desired geographic beam cross-polarization coverage.
The present invention helps standardize the system
302
to allow a single system
302
to serve multiple mission scenarios. The present invention allows designers to focus on a single design problem, e.g., the shape and geometry of the grid
304
, instead of multiple design problems, e.g., the grid
304
geometry, the feed horn
204
location, the reflector
202
size, shape, and depth, etc.
The present invention also allows each shaped reflector
202
to be boresighted in the same direction, e.g., the sub-satellite direction, as opposed to the related art, where each antenna has an individual boresight. The sub-satellite direction is the direction pointing from the center of the Earth to the focal point of the antenna reflector. This single boresight design feature allows for mechanical simplicity in spacecraft manufacturing, since the feed horn
204
for each satellite can now be located at the same position for many beam designs, resulting in very similar mechanical designs over many satellites.
Resultant Beam Coverage
FIG. 4
illustrates a beam design with the boresight within the designed geographic coverage area.
Beam design
400
illustrates boresight
402
, i.e., an axis that emanates substantially normal from the focal point
106
of reflector
202
, marginally within geographic coverage area
404
. Geographic coverage area
404
is shown as covering Western Europe, e.g., Spain, France, the United Kingdom, etc., but geographic coverage area
404
can cover any desired geographic location. Boresight
402
is located at zero degrees point
406
and zero degrees point
408
on beam design
400
.
FIG. 5
illustrates the co-polar performance of an antenna system described with respect to FIG.
4
.
Beam pattern
500
shows lines
502
-
506
of constant power for the design described in
FIG. 4
, i.e., where the boresight
402
is located within the desired coverage pattern.
FIG. 6
illustrates a beam design with the boresight outside the designed geographic coverage area.
Beam design
600
no longer illustrates the boresight, i.e., an axis that emanates substantially normal from the focal point
106
of reflector
202
, because although zero degree point
406
is still indicated, the zero degree point for the elevation is not indicated. The center of the beam design is at a six degree point
602
, and thus, the boresight is no longer marginally within geographic coverage area
604
. Geographic coverage area
604
is shown as covering Western Europe, e.g., Spain, France, the United Kingdom, etc., but geographic coverage area
604
can cover any desired geographic location.
FIG. 7
illustrates the co-polar performance of an antenna system described with respect to FIG.
6
.
Beam pattern
700
shows lines
702
-
706
of constant power for the design described in
FIG. 6
, i.e., where the boresight
402
is not located within the desired coverage pattern. The beam pattern
700
closely emulates the beam pattern
500
illustrated in FIG.
5
.
For beam patterns
500
and
700
, the reflective grids for reflectors
202
were designed to be parallel as seen along the reflector
202
boresight
402
. Even though the boresight
402
moved, e.g., was substantially within the coverage area in
FIGS. 4 and 5
, and was not within the coverage area in
FIGS. 6 and 7
, the co-polarization characteristics of the beam patterns
500
and
700
were almost identical.
However, the cross polarization characteristics of the two beam patterns
500
and
700
are quite different.
Illustration of Co-polarization and Cross-polarization Patterns
FIG. 8
illustrates the cross-polarization characteristics of a system with the boresight substantially within the coverage area.
Beam pattern
800
illustrates the cross-polarization patterns measured as a ratio between the co-polar and cross-polar measurements (also known as the C/I ratio) for system
500
, with a peak C/I performance at point
802
of 56.81 dB, at approximately minus 2 degrees azimuth, minus one degree elevation. Lines
804
-
808
illustrate lines of constant power, with line
804
corresponding to 33 dB, line
806
corresponding to 32 dB, and line
808
corresponding to 31 dB.
FIG. 9
illustrates the cross-polarization characteristics of a system with the boresight outside of the coverage area.
Beam pattern
900
illustrates the cross-polarization patterns measured as a ratio between the co-polar and cross-polar measurements of system
700
, with a peak performance at point
902
of 58.33 dB, at approximately minus 2 degrees azimuth, plus seven degrees elevation. Lines
904
-
908
illustrate lines of constant power, with line
904
corresponding to 33 dB, line
906
corresponding to 32 dB, and line
908
corresponding to 31 dB. When compared to the beam pattern
800
of
FIG. 8
, the patterns are rather different, and the peak C/I performance of beam pattern
900
is approximately 3 dB worse than the system
500
that has the boresight located in the coverage region as shown in FIG.
8
. Note that in beam pattern
900
, lines
904
,
906
, and
908
now cross over desired coverage area
604
, which means that the C/I ratio is lower for beam pattern
900
than the C/I ratio for beam pattern
800
, which does not have any similar power level lines crossing over the desired coverage area
604
.
FIG. 10
illustrates the cross-polarization characteristics of a system utilizing the grid patterns of the present invention, with the boresight outside of the coverage area.
Beam pattern
1000
illustrates the cross-polarization patterns measured as a ratio between the co-polar and cross-polar measurements of the system of the present invention, with a peak performance at point
1002
of 60.64 dB, at approximately minus 1 degrees azimuth, plus seven degrees elevation. Lines
1004
-
1008
illustrate lines of constant power, with line
1004
corresponding to 33 dB, line
1006
corresponding to 32 dB, and line
1008
corresponding to 31 dB. Note again that the C/I ratio for beam pattern
1000
is similar to that of beam pattern
800
of
FIG. 8
, which is a large improvement over the beam pattern
900
shown in FIG.
9
. The cross-polarization characteristics of the present invention, as shown in
FIG. 10
, allow spacecraft designers to have a fixed feed horn location on the spacecraft, and maneuver the beam location solely through the shaping and pointing of the reflector, by using the non-parallel grid lines to lower the cross-polarization characteristics of the antenna system. As such, manufacturing of spacecraft systems will require less design time and less manufacturing time, since the feed horn can now be located at a common position for various mission scenarios.
When compared to the C/I beam patterns of
FIGS. 8 and 9
, the beam pattern
1000
of
FIG. 10
illustrates that the cross-polarization characteristics of the present invention are much better compared to those of the related art. The peak performance of a system made in accordance with the present invention has better peak performance than the related art, and has a C/I ratio comparable to if not greater than the boresight-dependent antennas of the related art. The grid design that produced beam pattern
1000
is a grid that is designed to be parallel as seen at an angle inclined at about 7 degrees from the sub-satellite boresight. The co-polarization performance is similar to that shown in
FIGS. 5 and 7
, and was unaffected by the grid design.
Process Chart
FIG. 11
is a flowchart illustrating the steps used to practice the present invention. Block
1100
illustrates performing the step of illuminating a reflector with an RF signal emanating from a feed horn, the feed horn being substantially located at a focal point of the reflector, wherein the reflector comprises a reflective grid.
Block
1102
illustrates performing the step of reflecting the RF signal with the reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam.
Conclusion
This concludes the description of the preferred embodiment of the invention. The following paragraphs describe some alternative methods of accomplishing the same objects. The present invention, although described with respect to RF systems, can also be used with optical systems or lensed RF systems to accomplish the same goals. Further, multiple antenna systems
302
as described can reside on a single satellite, providing further flexibility in satellite design. The antenna system of the present invention can also be used in other applications, such as ground based antenna systems, or tracking radar systems.
The antenna of the present invention can also use dual grids within the reflector
202
to reflect multiple polarizations of RF signals at substantially the same frequency, or RF signals of different frequencies. As an example, the outer grid
302
of the reflector
202
reflects substantially horizontally polarized signals, and a second grid
302
of the reflector
202
reflects substantially vertically polarized signals. Either surface on reflector
202
can be designed to reflect any polarization of signal.
In summary, the present invention discloses a method for broadcasting, a signal, and an antenna system. The antenna system comprises a feed horn and a reflector. The feed horn provides a radio frequency (RF) signal. The reflector is aligned with the feed horn and is illuminated by the feed horn, and comprises a reflective grid. The reflective grid lines are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system.
A method in accordance with the present invention comprises illuminating a reflector with an RF signal emanating from a feed horn, the feed horn being substantially located at a focal point of the reflector, wherein the reflector comprises a reflective grid, and reflecting the RF signal with the reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Claims
- 1. An antenna system, comprising:a feed horn, wherein the feed horn provides a radio frequency (RF) signal; and a reflector, aligned with the feed horn, the reflector being illuminated by the feed horn, comprising a reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam from the antenna system; wherein the geographic location is off a focal axis of the reflector.
- 2. The antenna system of claim 1,wherein the reflector is substantially paraboloid in shape.
- 3. The antenna system of claim 1, further comprising:a second feed horn, wherein the second feed horn provides a second radio frequency (RF) signal, and the reflector further comprises a second reflective grid, orthogonally polarized with respect to the reflective grid, wherein the feed horn illuminates the reflector with a fist polarization and the second feed horn illuminates the reflector with a second polarization substantially orthogonal to the first polarization.
- 4. The antenna system of claim 3, wherein the reflective grid and the second reflective grid are illuminated by the feed horn and the second feed horn at the same time.
- 5. The antenna system of claim 4, wherein the feed horn illuminates the reflector with horizontally polarized signals and the second feed horn illuminates the reflector with vertically polarized signals.
- 6. The antenna system of claim 3, wherein the RF signal and the second RF signal are at substantially the same frequency.
- 7. The antenna system of claim 1, wherein the reflective grid comprises a grid of substantially parallel lines that has been rotated with respect to a focal point of the reflector.
- 8. The antenna system of claim 1, wherein the reflective grid comprises a free form reflective grid having different spacings between lines.
- 9. A method of broadcasting a signal, comprising:illuminating a reflector with an RF signal emanating from a feed horn, the feed horn being substantially located at a focal point of the reflector, wherein the reflector comprises a reflective grid; and reflecting the RF signal with the reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam; wherein the geographic location is off a focal axis of the reflector.
- 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the reflector is substantially paraboloid in shape.
- 11. The method of claim 9, further comprising:illuminating the reflector with a second feed horn simultaneous with illuminating the reflector with the first feed horn, wherein the second feed horn provides a second radio frequency (RF) signal, the reflector further comprising a second reflective grid; and reflecting the second RF signal from the second reflective grid, wherein the second reflective grid is orthogonally polarized with respect to the reflective grid.
- 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the feed horn illuminates the reflector with horizontally polarized signals and the second feed horn illuminates the reflector with vertically polarized signals.
- 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the RF signal and the second RF signal are at substantially the same frequency.
- 14. The method of claim 9, wherein the reflective grid comprises a grid of substantially parallel lines that has been rotated with respect to a focal point of the reflector.
- 15. A signal broadcast from a satellite, formed by:illuminating a reflector with an RF signal emanating from a feed horn, the feed horn being substantially located at a focal point of the reflector, wherein the reflector comprises a reflective grid; and reflecting the RF signal with the reflective grid, wherein lines of the reflective grid are substantially parallel as viewed from a geographic location of a desired output beam wherein the geographic location is off a focal axis of the reflector.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
4625214 |
Parekh |
Nov 1986 |
A |
5160937 |
Fairlie et al. |
Nov 1992 |
A |
5581265 |
Stirland et al. |
Dec 1996 |
A |
5673056 |
Ramanujam et al. |
Sep 1997 |
A |
6052095 |
Ramanujam et al. |
Apr 2000 |
A |