The present invention relates to adhesive structures and, more specifically, to a dry adhesive structure that is inspired by dry biological adhesive structures.
Gripping devices are used to grip objects. Conventional gripping devices, such as clamps, magnets, and suction cups, can lift limited ranges of objects.
Shear-activated dry adhesives mimic biological gripping surfaces. Such gripping surfaces are applied to an object by placing the gripping surface against the object. If the gripping surface has sufficient surface contact area with the object, van der Waals forces will hold the gripping surface to the object with sufficient adhesion to support a weight. For example, experimental gripping surfaces applied to a person's hands and feet can be used to support the person on the side of a wall.
Microscale and nanoscale spatulate surface structures enable certain animals to control attachment to many surfaces. For example, a gecko's toes stick to most surfaces, which allow it to climb up the sides of walls and even walk across ceilings. A gecko's foot has ridges on its toes with spatula-shaped bristly fibrils protruding a few dozen microns off the ridges. The fibrils make such thorough contact with surfaces at the nanoscale that weak attractions between atoms on both sides add up enormously to create overall strong adhesion.
Attempts have been made to develop rows of shapes covering materials that produce similar adhesion. One existing shape makes a material's surface look like a field of mushrooms that are a few hundred microns in size. When such mushroom patterns touch a surface, the attractive forces between the patterns and the surface result in the patterns being attached to the surface. However, detaching the patterns requires applying forces in directions that make disengagement difficult.
Many efforts have been made to make reversible shear-activated dry adhesives. A few types of engineered surfaces utilizing the wedge and flap geometry of contact elements have succeeded in mimicking key functions of the biological shear-activated adhesive pads, such as directional adhesion and high friction. Currently, these adhesives are manufactured using template-based molding, with the templates being fabricated by such techniques as photolithography, laser micromachining, and ultraprecision cutting. However, such template-based manufacturing tends to be complex and expensive.
Therefore, there is a need for a shear-activated dry adhesive that is inexpensive and easy to make.
The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention which, in one aspect, is a structure for adhering to a surface so as to support a desired weight that includes a substrate and a polymer layer. The polymer layer is mounted on the substrate. A plurality of flaps have been drawn from the polymer layer. Each of the plurality of flaps have dimensions and a density so that when the plurality of flaps are placed against the surface and when a coherent shear force is applied thereto, the plurality of flaps will adhere to the surface with a strength sufficient to support the desired weight. Each of the plurality of flaps includes a first side and an opposite second side. At least one of the first side or the second side is meniscus shaped.
In another aspect, the invention is a method of making a gripping surface on a substrate for gripping an object, in which an uncured polymer layer is applied to the substrate. A plurality of spaced-apart drawing elements is dipped into the polymer layer. The drawing elements are drawn away from the substrate so that uncured polymer from the polymer layer adheres to sides of the drawing elements. The polymer is cured. The drawing elements are removed so as to leave cured polymer flaps extending from the polymer layer, the flaps having end areas that adhere to the object when placed against the object and when a shear force is applied to the gripping surface.
In yet another aspect, the invention is a method of making a gripping surface on a substrate for gripping an object, in which at least one substrate spacer is applied to the substrate. An uncured polymer layer is applied to the substrate so that the uncured polymer layer is substantially as thick as the substrate spacer. The uncured polymer layer is partially cured to a point at which the polymer layer has a predetermined viscosity. A plurality of spaced-apart drawing elements is dipped into the polymer layer. The drawing elements are drawn away from the substrate so that uncured polymer from the polymer layer adheres to sides of the drawing elements so that uncured polymer adhering to the sides of the drawing elements has meniscus shape. The polymer is cured. The drawing elements are removed so as to leave cured polymer flaps extending from the polymer layer. Each of the cured polymer flaps has at least one meniscus shaped vertical side. The cured polymer flaps have end areas that adhere to the object when placed against the object when a lateral shear force is applied to the gripping surface.
These and other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the following drawings. As would be obvious to one skilled in the art, many variations and modifications of the invention may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the disclosure.
A preferred embodiment of the invention is now described in detail. Referring to the drawings, like numbers indicate like parts throughout the views. Unless otherwise specifically indicated in the disclosure that follows, the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. The present disclosure should in no way be limited to the exemplary implementations and techniques illustrated in the drawings and described below. As used in the description herein and throughout the claims, the following terms take the meanings explicitly associated herein, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise: the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on.”
As shown in
As shown in
The drawing array 130 is dipped into the polymer layer 120 to a predetermined distance 122. Then, as shown in
As shown in
Generally, the dipping distance 122 should be much shorter than the drawing distance due to a possible necking and subsequent disconnection between the drawn flaps and the backing polymer layer. The dipping speed should be as slow as practical to minimize the formation of wrinkles on the polymer surface. The dipping time is also close to the drawing time, which is also measured from the instant of mixing, in order to minimize capillary rise of the polymer through the gap between drawing elements. Such capillary rise can disrupt the fabrication of high-aspect ratio microstructures. Once drawn, the drawing array 130 should be held substantially motionless with respect to the substrate 110 until the polymer layer 120 and flaps 142 are completely cured.
To draw high-aspect ratio flaps 142 upwards and have them fully cured before the polymer can sink back down, the polymer 120 should have a certain viscosity. On the other hand, if the polymer is too viscous, the drawn flaps 142 are excessively stressed, which leads to wrinkles or pores on the cured surface that affect detrimentally its adhesive performance.
In one experimental embodiment, the viscosities of curing PVS and PU mixtures were evaluated by studying their capillary rise in glass tubes as a function of time. In this embodiment, the viscosities of PVS and PU are shown within the time ranges of 30-80 seconds and 50-1320 seconds, respectively. These limits were set by the mixing time on one hand and by the end of the working time on the other hand, while the working time was defined as the time, beyond which no capillary rise is observed. In this experiment, it was found that the best flaps were obtained when the polymer viscosity was about 0.2 of the viscosity at the end of the working time. Drawing at larger viscosities leads to compromised surface quality due to unrelaxed surface stresses and to a more pronounced limitation in the achievable flap height 124 due to flap tearing from the backing layer.
Drawing at smaller viscosities can result in a lower flap height 124 and thickness 126 due to a gravity-driven sinking of the curing polymer and a higher capillary rise between drawing elements. Further, to provide the polymer with the time needed to adjust for the penetration of drawing elements, the polymer viscosity at the time of dipping can be a little lower than 0.1 of the viscosity at the end of the working time. Having these two viscosity limits can result in dipping/drawing times for both PVS and PU that are around 50/70 seconds and 1080/1200 seconds, respectively. The same approach may be used for finding operational regimes for other curing polymers once their time-dependent viscosity and working time are known.
As shown in
As shown in
The drawing distance defines the microstructure height parameters, of which the flap height is important. With the assumptions that (1) the capillary rise between drawing elements is negligible, (2) the flap thickness is negligible, and (3) the drawing array is large enough for the edge effects to be neglected as well, the ratio of the flap height to the drawing distance should be equal to about 2 if the gap between the U-shaped drawing elements (shown in
To adhere a gripping surface of the type disclosed herein, a coherent shear force needs to be applied to the gripping surface so that the flaps all bend in the same direction. This maximizes the contact area between the flaps and the object. One embodiment of a device for adhesion to a vertical surface 400, as shown in
Scanning electron microscopy images of wall-shaped adhesive microstructures are shown in
Photographs demonstrating affixation, lifting and releasing of an object are shown in
In one experimental embodiment, two types of laboratory razor blades were used as drawing elements—thick blades (Pacific Handy Cutter, Costa Mesa, Calif.) with thickness of 229 μm and the tip angle of 18% and thin blades (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, Calif.) with thickness of 76 μm and the tip angle of 22′. Both the sharp (V-shaped) and the blunt (U-shaped) edges of the blades were used for drawing. 3M Scotch Magic 810 (3M, Maplewood, Minn.) tape was used as a spacer for even separation of adjacent U-shaped drawing elements, whereas the V-shaped drawing elements were assembled without spacers. The blades were aligned and assembled to make microstructures on an area of at least 2.5 mm in width, while the gaps between thick and thin U-shaped drawing elements were about 240 μm and 60 μm (4 and 1 sheet of the spacer tape), respectively, and the gaps between the tips of thick and thin V-shaped drawing elements were 229 μm and 76 μm (blade thicknesses), respectively.
Also, two types of soft polymer composed of base material and curing agent were used to prepare the microstructured surfaces: PolyVinylSiloxane (PVS; Coltène Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) and PolyUrethane (PU; BJB Enterprises, Tustin, Calif.), with Young's moduli of 3 and 2 MPa, respectively. To fabricate the microstructures, the curing polymer mixture was first smeared onto the glass slide (after dwell times of 30 seconds for PVS and 720 seconds for PU) using a razor blade and spacers to have a uniform thickness of about 300 μm and 180 μm for thick U-shaped and V-shaped drawing elements, respectively, and of about 120 μm for thin drawing elements of both types.
The fabrication was performed using an automatic stepper motor to move the drawing array, a manual stage to adjust the position of the polymer sample, and a camera to observe the process, in a contact angle measurement system OCA 25 (DataPhysics Instruments, Filderstadt, Germany). First, the curing polymer sample was manually brought in contact with the drawing array, and then the motor was used to control the rest of the process. After complete curing of the drawn microstructures, the drawn array was simply detached from the polymer sample in the case of PVS. When working with a much tackier PU, the drawing array and PU sample were disassembled together from the drawing setup, and then they were held in a water-filled M1800H ultrasonic bath (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, Conn., USA) for an hour before the sample was detached.
The gripper will adhere to almost any surface. This is a clear advantage in manufacturing because one does not have to prepare the gripper for specific surfaces. Such dry adhesives can lift flat objects like boxes and lift curved objects like eggs and vegetables.
In the experimental embodiments, drawing-based manufacturing has been successfully implemented to fabricate dry shear-activated adhesives that demonstrate high flexibility, cost-efficiency, simplicity and scalability of the method. The environmentally-friendly fabrication process can be robustly controlled by such processing parameters as the tool speed, time and displacement during the dipping and drawing stages, making it suitable for mass production.
Although specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include some, none, or all of the enumerated advantages. Other technical advantages may become readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after review of the following figures and description. It is understood that, although exemplary embodiments are illustrated in the figures and described below, the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not. Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein without departing from the scope of the invention. The components of the systems and apparatuses may be integrated or separated. The operations of the systems and apparatuses disclosed herein may be performed by more, fewer, or other components and the methods described may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order. As used in this document, “each” refers to each member of a set or each member of a subset of a set. It is intended that the claims and claim elements recited below do not invoke 35 U.S.C. §112(f) unless the words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular claim. The above-described embodiments, while including the preferred embodiment and the best mode of the invention known to the inventor at the time of filing, are given as illustrative examples only. It will be readily appreciated that many deviations may be made from the specific embodiments disclosed in this specification without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be determined by the claims below rather than being limited to the specifically described embodiments above.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/976,190, filed Feb. 13, 2020, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2021/017660 | 2/11/2021 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62976190 | Feb 2020 | US |