1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to an accessory for use with a post anchor to provide load bearing capacity for supporting decks, sheds and other light framed construction structures. This anchor and plate device is intended to support structures with both vertical and lateral loads without the need for traditional post holes, concrete or ledger boards.
2. Description of Related Art
Foundations for decks, sheds, stairways, etc., are typically mounted to the ground by digging a hole, filling the hole with concrete and then placing the support post on top of this foundation. This process is effective but time consuming. Furthermore, extra care must be taken to be sure that the concrete footing post is deep enough and wide enough to properly protect the foundation from frost heave and settlement. This has led building inspectors to require post hole inspections to assure compliance to local building codes.
Foundation problems have also been addressed in the prior art by providing cement blocks that can sit on the ground to support the deck structure. In the prior art, an example exists of a cement block with slots for the posts to rest on to form a foundation. Examples are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,392,575, 5,953,874 and 6,609,346, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The above mentioned foundation has several flaws which have limited its effectiveness. The cement block foundation technique relies on gravity to hold the deck posts to the cement footing. This is not useful in many situations where uplift can occur from wind or other similar environmental effects.
Deck blocks also do not have any means for stopping the block from sliding or moving on the surface of the ground which could present a safety concern. Furthermore, deck blocks do not provide any lateral support to the post that sits on them. Thus, additional angular bracing is required to fix the problem. This adds cost and additional labor to the construction project.
A need accordingly exists for a more effective mechanism for providing a foundation for supporting decks, sheds and other light framed construction structures.
An embodiment of the invention comprises a ground anchor and weight distribution plate assembly.
In an embodiment, the anchor and plate are separate structural items which are assembled together during installation. In an alternative embodiment, the anchor and plate form a single assembled unit.
In an embodiment, the anchor comprises a ground engaging portion and a post receiving portion. The ground engaging portion includes one or more fin members. The post receiving portion forms an opening dimensioned to be large enough in size to receive a post to be associated with said post anchor.
In an embodiment, the plate has a convex upper surface and a concave lower surface with an opening between those surfaces which is sized and shaped to receive the ground engaging portion of the anchor extending partially there through, but interact at its upper surface with the post receiving portion of the anchor.
In another embodiment, an apparatus is provided which includes a weight distribution plate and a post receiving member mounted to an upper surface of the plate.
A more complete understanding of the method and apparatus of the present invention may be acquired by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings wherein:
In the Drawings, like reference numerals refer to like or similar parts. Applicants incorporate by reference co-pending United States applications for patent Ser. Nos. 11/593,396 and 11/593,438 which were both filed on Nov. 6, 2006. Applicants further reference U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,461,084 and 6,560,935, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
With reference to
As discussed above, the post receiving portion 14 is generally larger, at least at or about a top 18 of the post receiving portion 14, than the post 16 which is to be received. The post 16 is inserted into the slightly larger opening in the post receiving portion 14 at the top 18 and pushed down into the opening in the post receiving portion 14 until the received post 16 is seated at a base 20 (see,
In the embodiment of
The impressions 22 are shown in
The embodiment of
The ground engaging portion 12 includes a plurality of fins 24. The fins taper at a lower portion 26 thereof to form a point 28 which aids insertion of the ground engaging portion 12 into the ground. Although a finned structure is preferred, it will be appreciated that a solid structure, or indeed a variety of other structures, will be suitable.
Reference is now made to
An aperture 32 is provided in each impression 22. This aperture is designed to allow for the insertion of a screw there-through, with any such screw engaging a received post 16 so as to further assure retention of the post 16 within the post receiving portion 14. Advantageously, the impression 22 creates a counter-sinking depression on the outer surface of the post receiving portion 14 within which the inserted screw can sit after installation and not protrude (or not protrude as much) out from the outer surface of the post receiving portion 14. Tightening of the inserted screws to engage the post 16 can cause further extension of the impressions 22 in the inwardly direction so as to even more securely engage the outer surface of the received post 16.
In both
It will be recognized that the aperture 34 may alternatively, or additionally, be used to allow for the insertion of a screw (or bolt) there-through, with any such screw/bolt engaging a received post 16 so as to further assure retention of the post 16 within the post receiving portion 14.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
As shown most clearly in
The impressions 52 shown in
The placement of the impressions 52 only at or near the bottom 20 of the post receiving portion 14 assists in installation of the post in a plumb relationship. The impressions engage the lower portion of the post 16 when seated in the opening of the post receiving portion 14. This allows for gaps at or near the top 18 of the post receiving portion 14 to be present. By rocking the post 16 within the post receiving portion 14, adjustments to achieve a plumb installation can be made. Once plumb is established, the apertures 34 can be used for adhesive insertion or screw insertion in order to secure the post in that established plumb position.
The above description has been made in terms of a four fin 24 ground engaging portion 12. The invention is not limited to this situation. In fact, the ground engaging portion 12 may be a single fin or spike. The four fin 24 arrangement, however, is the most suitable in many applications.
It will be appreciated that the post anchor 10 described above provides a secure association of the post 16 to the post anchor 10 by virtue of the impressions 22/52 that make a secure engagement with the post 16. With this design the post receiving portion 14 can be completely or partially buried in the ground so the final appearance is visually pleasing and functionally superior to the prior art. Furthermore, should the post become damaged, it can be replaced by removal of the securing hardware and post. A new post can then be placed into the post receiving portion and forced into the impressions to make a secure engagement with the post.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
The ground plate 102 is formed to have a cupped shape (i.e., the upper surface 106 is convex while a lower surface 110 is correspondingly concave. This cupped shape serves at least two functions. First, when the assembly 100 is installed, the cupping of the plate 102 (through the concave lower surface 110) compresses the underlying soil into and against the ground engaging portion 12 of the post support anchor 10. Second, the bends in the structure of plate 102 used to form the cupped shape provide additional resistance to bending of the plate during installation and further use.
The weight distribution plate 102 can be square, round or any other useful shape. The post receiving portion 14 could be formed to adapt for all types of posts such as steel, aluminum, wood, plastic and composite materials in a wide range of sizes and shapes.
Larger and thicker plates 102 could be made for larger test loads and smaller and thinner plates could be made for lighter loads.
Holes (not shown) may be provided in the plate 102 for use in temporarily locating the plate during the construction process. In addition the holes provide a visual aid to inspect the compaction of the soil below the plate. The holes, however, are not required for the design to function but are included primarily to improve installation ease.
Installation of the assembly 100 is as follows. The jackhammer installation method is preferred as the jackhammer acts as a driving device for the post support anchor 10 and also a compaction tool for the plate 102. When the bottom edge of the post receiving portion 14 of the post support anchor 10 bottoms out on the top surface 16 of the deck plate, the jackhammer vibrates the entire assembly and produces a compaction effect to assure that the supporting soil underlying the plate and surrounding the ground engaging portion 12 of the post support anchor 10 is compacted to a density that can support the design load.
The cupped shape of the plate 102 is such that the when the plate is compacted with the jackhammer the soil is forced toward the center of the post support and also provides a means to remove voids and air pockets in the soil to produce a stronger foundation. The result is a cone shaped area 120 (see,
The jackhammer installation method produces the best results and performance but a sledgehammer or other similar means of driving the post anchor in the ground through the deck plate 102 will also produce acceptable results.
This assembly 100 design is superior to deck blocks because in combination the post anchor and deck plate assembly 100 offers both lateral load strength and also vertical load strength. Also the post anchor provides uplift resistance from wind or other similar forces.
The deck plate 102 is preferably made of steel, but can also be made of other materials such as stainless steel, aluminum, plastic, composite plastic, and also concrete.
The deck plate 102 does not require the use of a post anchor to work. A top sleeve 14 for supporting a post could be placed on the top of the plate 102 and fastened there with welding or screws. This type of assembly is illustrated in
The deck plate 102 is preferably made of hot dipped galvanized steel to provide long lasting performance and also have resistance to preservative chemicals often found in treated lumber products. Other materials could be utilized to also produce similar resistance to deterioration.
Although preferred embodiments of the method and apparatus of the present invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application for Pat. No. 60/990522 of the same title filed on Nov. 27, 2007, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
23905 | Dewey | May 1859 | A |
239080 | Baker | Mar 1881 | A |
412766 | Lounsberry | Oct 1889 | A |
632966 | Mullenix | Sep 1899 | A |
795405 | Moore | Jul 1905 | A |
822131 | Hyder | May 1906 | A |
1611935 | Mitchell | Dec 1926 | A |
1736177 | Snook | Nov 1929 | A |
3066447 | Reiterer et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3342444 | Nelson | Sep 1967 | A |
3531090 | Liable | Sep 1970 | A |
3698144 | Stratton | Oct 1972 | A |
3724145 | Daniel | Apr 1973 | A |
3899856 | Johnson | Aug 1975 | A |
3969853 | Deike | Jul 1976 | A |
3974604 | Conn et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4021977 | Deike | May 1977 | A |
4185424 | Streit | Jan 1980 | A |
4271646 | Mills et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4279104 | Classen | Jul 1981 | A |
4516365 | Chapman | May 1985 | A |
4588157 | Mills et al. | May 1986 | A |
4603520 | Deike | Aug 1986 | A |
4615156 | Deike | Oct 1986 | A |
4795137 | Witt | Jan 1989 | A |
4831760 | Walker | May 1989 | A |
4860940 | Mills et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4874149 | Miceli | Oct 1989 | A |
4923164 | Stenberg | May 1990 | A |
4926785 | Lamson | May 1990 | A |
5082231 | Knowles | Jan 1992 | A |
5085281 | Selly | Feb 1992 | A |
5709366 | Speece | Jan 1998 | A |
5927677 | Speece et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6039298 | Stier | Mar 2000 | A |
D424713 | Blackwell et al.. | May 2000 | S |
D439437 | Crete et al. | Mar 2001 | S |
6272798 | Cockman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343446 | Beard | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6402115 | Groff et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412235 | Pylant | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6461084 | Stuart | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6560935 | Barefield et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6745990 | Groff et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D493205 | Combes | Jul 2004 | S |
D532121 | Watson et al. | Nov 2006 | S |
7134636 | Callies | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152841 | Callies | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7241079 | Francis et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D549853 | Walker et al. | Aug 2007 | S |
20020066241 | Johnson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020066248 | Buhrts et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030014925 | Cox | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030084620 | Benincasa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050144888 | Snyders | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050279896 | Callies | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060142402 | Dunnrowicz | Jun 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 701 504 | Aug 1994 | FR |
2 426 777 | Dec 2006 | GB |
2 431 938 | May 2007 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090133337 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60990522 | Nov 2007 | US |