The present invention relates to a ground improvement body constructed under the foundation of a building.
As a ground improvement body to be constructed under the foundation of a building when the building is built on soft ground, there is a ground improvement body composed of a horizontal plate-shaped upper improvement body, and a lattice-shaped lower improvement body (e.g., refer to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 of Patent Literature (PTL) 1, and FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 of PTL 2).
Such a ground improvement body composed of a horizontal plate-shaped upper improvement body and a lattice-shaped lower improvement body (hereinafter referred to as “ground improvement body including a lattice-shaped improvement body”) is characterized by, for example, being capable of suppressing differential settlement while reducing the weight of the ground improvement body (improved volume), in comparison with a ground improvement body obtained by performing ground improvement to the entire ground under the foundation of a building.
[PTL 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H8-302667
[PTL 2] Japanese Patent No. 3608568
[PTL 3] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H7-229153
It is known that column axial force caused by a dead load (long-term load) is generally small at an outer peripheral part and increases toward a center part (e.g., refer to FIG. 4 of PTL 3).
However, in the conventional ground improvement body including the lattice-shaped improvement body, a primary improved depth and width determined for the center part is applied to the periphery part.
Therefore, although the conventional ground improvement body including the lattice-shaped improvement body has the aforementioned characteristics, there is room for improvement in terms of further reducing the settlement and the improved volume of the ground improvement body.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a ground improvement body capable of further reducing the settlement and the improved volume, in comparison with the conventional ground improvement body including the lattice-shaped improvement body.
The summary of the present invention is as follows.
According to a ground improvement body of the present invention, the ground contact pressure of the ground improvement body is balanced between its outer peripheral part and center part. Thus, as compared to a conventional ground improvement body including a lattice-shaped improvement body, absolute settlement can be suppressed, and a relative settlement can be reduced, whereby differential settlement can be alleviated. Moreover, the volume of the ground improvement body can be reduced, thereby reducing construction cost.
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
The structure of a ground improvement body 1 and a construction method therefor will be described by representatively referring to the plan view of
The ground improvement body 1 is composed of a horizontal plate-shaped upper improvement body 2 and a lattice-shaped lower improvement body 3.
First, a surface-layer ground G below a ground surface GL is dug into a desired shape by, for example, plowing using a backhoe.
Next, the ground is excavated into the shape of the lower improvement body 3 by using, for example, a backhoe to which a mixing fork is mounted as an attachment. Then, mixing and stirring are performed while a solidification material such as a cement-based solidification material is added and mixed, and compaction is performed by a heavy machine and a roller, etc., to form the lower improvement body 3.
Next, the soil having been dug out in the dig-down step is backfilled to the upper side of the lower improvement body 3 by using a backhoe or the like. Then, the surface-layer ground G is excavated from the ground surface GL into the shape of the upper improvement body 2 by using, for example, a backhoe to which a mixing fork is mounted as an attachment. Then, mixing and stirring are performed while a solidification material is added and mixed, and compaction is performed by a heavy machine and a roller, etc., to form the upper improvement body 2.
After construction of the ground improvement body 1, footings (concrete foundations under columns), columns, and the like are constructed. That is, an upper part of the upper improvement body 2 above intersections of the lattice-shaped lower improvement body 3 shown in the plan view of
In the embodiment described below, regarding first to third examples, the depth of the lower improvement body 3 is gradually increased from an outer peripheral part B of the ground improvement body 1 toward a center part C of the ground improvement body 1. In a fourth example described below, the depth of the lower improvement body 3 tends to be gradually increased from the outer peripheral part B of the ground improvement body 1 toward the center part C of the ground improvement body 1 as a whole, but the depths of some ground improvement bodies (an intermediate improvement body A2 between adjacent footings F2, F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2, and an inner-side connection improvement body A23) are reduced.
In the first example (
In the second example (
In the third example (
In a fourth example (
In the examples of the plan views of
In the first example shown in the plan view of
The outer periphery improvement body A1 supports columns C1 and footings F1 of the outer peripheral part B of the ground improvement body 1. The intermediate improvement body A2 supports columns C2 and footings F2, which are spaced apart from the columns C1 and the footings F1 supported by the outer periphery improvement body A1 toward the center part C of the ground improvement body 1. The central improvement body A3 supports a column C3 and a footing F3 at the center part C of the ground improvement body 1.
The outer-side connection improvement body A12 connects the footings F1 supported by the outer periphery improvement body A1 with the footings F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2. The inner-side connection improvement body A23 connects the footings F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2 with the footing F3 supported by the central improvement body A3.
The depth D1 of the outer periphery improvement body A1, the depth D2 of the intermediate improvement body A2, and the depth D3 of the central improvement body A3 satisfy D1<D2<D3. The depth D12 of the outer-side connection improvement body A12 and the depth D23 of the inner-side connection improvement body A23 satisfy D12=D1 and D23=D3.
The width W1 of the outer periphery improvement body A1, the width W2 of the intermediate improvement body A2, the width W3 of the central improvement body A3, the width W12 of the outer-side connection improvement body A12, and the width W23 of the inner-side connection improvement body A23 are equal to each other, that is, satisfy W1=W2=W3=W12=W23.
The lower improvement body 3 according to the second example shown in the plan view of
That is, the width W1 of the outer periphery improvement body A1, the width W2 of the intermediate improvement body A2, and the width W3 of the central improvement body A3 satisfy W1<W2<W3, and the width W12 of the outer-side connection improvement body A12 and the width W23 of the inner-side connection improvement body A23 satisfy W12=W2 and W23=W3.
The lower improvement body 3 according to the third example shown in the plan view of
That is, the width W1 of the outer periphery improvement body A1 around the footing F1 supported by the outer periphery improvement body A1, the width W2 of the intermediate improvement body A2 around the footing F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2, and the width W3 of the central improvement body A3 around the footing A3 supported by the central improvement body A3 satisfy W1<W2<W3, and satisfy W10<W1, W20<W2, W12<W1, and W23<W2. In the example shown in
Moreover, as shown in
The lower improvement body 3 according to the fourth example shown in the plan view of
That is, the depth D1 of the outer periphery improvement body around the footing F1 supported by the outer periphery improvement body A1, the depth D2 of the intermediate improvement body F2 around the footing F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2, and the depth D3 of the central improvement body A3 around the footing F3 supported by the central improvement body A3 satisfy D1<D2<D3. The depth D10 of the outer periphery improvement body A1 between adjacent footings F1, F1 supported by the outer periphery improvement body A1, and the depth D20 of the intermediate improvement body A2 between adjacent footings F2, F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2 satisfy D10=D1 and D20=D23. The depth D12 of the outer-side connection improvement body and the depth D23 of the inner-side connection improvement body satisfy D12=D1 and D12<D23<D2.
In the ground improvement body 1 of the present invention, for example, the depth, or the depth and width, of the lower improvement body 3 is reduced toward the outer peripheral part B, in contrast with the depth and width (primary improved depth and width) of the lower improvement body 3 which are determined at the center part C during designing, thereby balancing the ground contact pressure of the ground improvement body between the center part C and the outer peripheral part B. Thus, as compared to the conventional ground improvement body including the lattice-shaped improvement body, the absolute settlement is suppressed, and the relative settlement is reduced, whereby differential settlement can be alleviated. Moreover, the volume of the ground improvement body can be reduced, thereby reducing construction cost.
Next, numerical analysis performed to confirm the effects of the present invention will be described.
Assuming that the surface layer ground G is a 20 m deep clay layer, numerical analysis is performed using soil finite element method (FEM) analysis software (PLAXIS). Evaluation items are “ground contact pressure under lower improvement body 3”, “maximum absolute settlement”, “maximum relative settlement”, and “volume of ground improvement body 1”.
Assuming that the settlement in the state where all loads such as buildings and footings are not mounted is 0, the “absolute settlement” is the settlement due to the loads. The “maximum absolute settlement” is a maximum value of the absolute settlement in the site.
Assuming that, after settlement due to the loads, the smallest absolute settlement at a point among points in the site is 0, the “relative settlement” is the settlement at another point. The “maximum relative settlement” is a maximum value of the relative settlement in the site.
Examples include the first to fourth examples. A comparative example is shown in the plan view of
As for the size of the ground improvement body 1, for example, the distance between adjacent columns, which is denoted by “H” in
The ground contact pressure under the ground improvement body 3 can be divided into: a ground contact pressure due to a point load (i.e., column axial force: self-weight of building+live loads of second and higher floors); and a ground contact pressure due to a surface load (live load of first floor+self-weight of floor concrete+self-weight of footings+self-weight of ground improvement body).
The ground contact pressure due to the point load under the ground improvement body 3 is great because it concentrates directly under the ground improvement body 3, and has a significant influence on settlement. Meanwhile, the surface load is evenly applied over the entire site, and the ground contact pressure per unit area is small and equalized, in comparison with the column load. Therefore, the surface load has less influence on differential settlement than the column load.
The load in the analysis for obtaining the “ground contact pressure under lower improvement body 3” is only the “point load”, in order to clarify a difference in ground contact pressure due to the point load having a significant influence on differential settlement. The point load in the analysis imitates a dead load (long-term load) that is actually applied and gradually increases from the outer peripheral part B toward the center part C. A point load applied to each of 16 columns C1 in the outer peripheral part B of the ground improvement body 1 is 200 kN, and a point load applied to each of nine columns C3 and C2 in the center part C and the intermediate part is 400 kN.
As for the loads in the analysis for obtaining the “maximum absolute settlement” and the “maximum relative settlement”, the surface load is applied in addition to the “point load” described above. The surface load is self-weight of 24 kN/m3 of footings F1, F2, F3, and self-weight of 17 kN/m3 of the ground improvement body 1 are applied to the range of the floor concrete E, as a load based on the self-weight of the floor concrete E and the live load, a surface load of 14.8 kN/m2.
Table 1 shows results of the analysis.
According to the “ground contact pressure under lower improvement body 3” in Table 1, the ground contact pressures at the outer peripheral part B and the center part C of the first to fourth examples are balanced or reversed with respect to those of the comparative example. Since the settlement is substantially proportional to the ground contact pressure, the “settlement” in Table 1 indicates that the absolute settlement is more suppressed and the relative settlement is more reduced in the first to fourth examples than in the comparative example, and thus differential settlement can be alleviated.
According to the “volume of ground improvement body 1” in Table 1, the volume of the ground improvement body 1 is reduced by 4% in the first example, 1% in the second example, 15% in the third example, and 18% in the fourth example with respect to that of the comparative example. Thus, construction cost can be reduced.
In particular, as in the third example and the fourth example, the volume (weight) of the ground improvement body 1 can be significantly reduced while alleviating differential settlement, by reducing the width W10 of the outer periphery improvement body A1 between the adjacent footings F1, F1 supported by the outer periphery improvement body A1, the width W20 of the intermediate improvement body A2 between the adjacent footings F2, F2 supported by the intermediate improvement body A2, the width W12 of the outer-side connection improvement body A12, and the width W23 of the inner-side connection improvement body A23. Therefore, the effect of reducing construction cost is enhanced.
Since the sizes of the footings F1, F2, F3 are determined based on the stress from the building and the ground strengths of the improved ground and the original ground, the width W1 of the outer periphery improvement body A1 around the footing F1, the width W2 of the intermediate improvement body A2 around the footing F2, and the width W3 of the central improvement body A3 around the footing A3 are limited and cannot be made smaller than required sizes. Therefore, it is possible to realize a significant reduction in the volume (weight) of the ground improvement body 1 while alleviating differential settlement, by reducing, in particular, the width W10 of the outer periphery improvement body A1 between the adjacent footings F1, F1, the width W20 of the intermediate improvement body A2 between the adjacent footings F2, F2, the width W12 of the outer-side connection improvement body A12, and the width W23 of the inner-side connection improvement body A23 (W10<W1, W20<W2, W12<W1, W23<W2<W3), as in the third example and the fourth example.
In the conventional design and construction, the ground contact pressure due to the force acting on the center part is smaller than the ground strength (allowable value), as a standard, and the ground contact pressure is maximized within a range that satisfies the standard, thereby minimizing the footings and the ground volume to be improved. In contrast, in the present invention, the ground contact pressure due to the force acting on the center part is smaller than or equal to the ground contact pressure due to the force acting on the outer peripheral part which is smaller than the ground strength (allowable value) is applied as a standard, and design and construction is prioritized over suppression of differential settlement. That is, a purpose of the present invention is to increase each volume of the footings and the ground improvement until achieving suppression of differential settlement at the center part. However, since the volume of the ground to be improved at the center part is increased, the entire cost is increased. Therefore, the inventor of the present application expected the effect of offsetting an increase in cost or further reducing the cost while maintaining the effect of suppressing differential settlement, by reducing the improved volume between foundations, and proved the effect in this analysis.
The ground improvement body of the present invention provides the above effects, and therefore is suitably used as a ground improvement body to be constructed particularly under foundations of low-rise and large-area buildings such as factories, shopping centers, warehouses, and housing.
The above-described embodiment is in all aspects illustrative and not restrictive. Various modifications and variations can be devised without departing from the scope of the invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-001537 | Jan 2022 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2022/041961 | 11/10/2022 | WO |