The present disclosure relates to unguided, ground-launched projectiles and in particular to a system for accurately guiding ground projectiles such as mortar bombs and artillery shells. Many entities manufacture such unguided projectiles in various sizes and forms. Armed forces around the world maintain large inventories of these munitions. By their nature, unguided projectiles are “dumb” in that they are not accurately guided to a target. As a result, successful use of such projectiles is largely dependent on the particular skill and experience level of the person launching the projectile.
In view of the foregoing, there is a need for a system that can be used to accurately guide ground-launched projectiles such as mortar bombs and artillery shells. Disclosed herein is a device configured to convert an unguided projectile, such as a mortar bomb or artillery shell, into a precision-guided projectile. The device can be used to increase the effective range of a previously unguided projectile and also increase the ability of the projectile to optimally engage a target.
In one aspect, a guidance unit system is configured to be used for a ground-launched projectile. The system includes a housing configured to be attached to a ground-launched projectile. The housing is coupled to an attachment region that attaches to the projectile, wherein the housing is configure to rotate relative to the attachment region. A motor is contained within the housing and a bearing surrounding the motor. The bearing is rigidly attached to the housing such that the motor rotates with the housing and shields the motor from inertial loads experienced by the housing.
Other features and advantages should be apparent from the following description of various embodiments, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
Disclosed herein is a device configured to convert an unguided projectile, such as a mortar bomb or artillery shell, into a precision-guided projectile. The device can be used to increase the effective range of a previously unguided projectile and also increase the ability of the projectile to optimally engage a target. In one aspect, the device includes a motor that is shielded from the high loads that are typically experienced by such projectiles during launch and ballistic motion. The motor is advantageously configured to provide proportional actuation of one or more control surfaces (such as canards) of the projectile.
The guidance unit 110 may be equipped with a computer readable memory that is loaded with one or more software applications for controlling the guidance of the projectile 115. Moreover, the guidance unit 110 may be equipped with any of a variety of electro-mechanical components for effecting guidance and operation of the projectile. The components for effecting guidance can vary and can include, for example, a global positioning system (GPS), laser guidance system, image tracking, etc. The guidance unit 110 may also include an guidance-integrated fuse system for arming and fusing an explosive coupled to the projectile 115.
The configuration of the projectile 115 may vary. For example, the projectile 115 may be a tail-fin-stabilized projectile (TSP), such as a mortar bomb or artillery shell. Such an embodiment of a projectile includes one or more fins fixedly attached to the tail of the projectile. In another example, the projectile 115 is a spin-stabilized projectile (SSP). It should be appreciated that the projectile 115 may vary in type and configuration.
With reference still to
The guidance unit 110 is configured to achieve proportional actuation in a manner that makes the guidance unit 110 capable of surviving the extremely high loads associated with a gun-launched projectile. In this regard, a motor is mounted inside the front housing within a bearing that is rigidly attached to the housing, as described below. The bearing effectively provides an inertial shield over the motor such that the motor is free to rotate relative to the mortar body about the longitudinal axis A. This configuration advantageously reduces or eliminates inertial loads that are experienced during launch and/or flight from being transferred to the motor. Without such an inertial shield, the motor can experience loads during launch that have been shown to increase the likelihood of damage or destruction of the motor.
6A shows a perspective view of a portion of the front housing 305 of the guidance unit 110.
The motor 605 is mechanically coupled to the canards 320 via the drive shaft 610 and a geared plate 615. The plate 615 is mechanically coupled to the drive shaft 610 via a geared teeth arrangement. In this manner, the plate 615 translates rotational movement of the drive shaft 610 to corresponding rotational movement of a shaft 625. The shaft 625 is coupled to the canards 320. The motor 615 can be operated to move the canards 320 in a desired manner such as to achieve proportional actuation each canard 320.
With reference still to
Guidance of Tail-Fin-Stabilized Projectile
As mentioned, the guidance unit 110 is configured to provide control over a TSP. In this regards, the guidance unit 110 controls a TSP using roll-to-turn guidance by differentially actuating the canards 320 to achieve differential movement between one canard and another canard on the projectile 115. Such proportional actuation of the canards can be used to achieve a desired roll attitude while collectively actuating the canards to apply a pitching moment to achieve a desired angle of attack and lift. The cambered shape (
Guidance of Spin-Stabilized Projectile
The guidance unit is further configured to provide control over a SSP. The physical hardware of the guidance unit for an SSP can be identical to that used for a TSP. As mentioned, the airfoil profile can also differ between the SSP and TSP. The guidance software used for the SSP guidance may also be configured differently. For guidance of an SSP, the guidance unit 110 is alternately oriented in a vertical and horizontal orientation, as shown in
In use, the projectile 115 with guidance unit 110 is launched from a standard mortar tube. The guidance unit 110 controls its trajectory to the target according to guidance laws that assure optimum use of the available energy imparted at launch to reach maximum range and achieve steep-angle target engagement. It employs roll-to turn guidance to laterally steer to the target and to control the orientation of the unit relative to earth to optimize trajectory shaping in elevation
During the ascent and ingress portion of the trajectory, the cambered canards are differentially deflected to establish and maintain the control unit in the upright position (roll angle=0). Collective deflection of the fins serves to cause the mortar bomb to assume an angle of attack corresponding to maximum lift-to-drag ratio, which translates into the flattest glide ratio (distance travelled to height lost) in order to maximally extend the range of the round.
This condition is maintained until the line of sight angle to the target approaches a pre-set target engagement dive angle, at which point the fins are once again differentially deflected to cause the control unit to invert (roll angle=180 degrees) and collectively deflected to cause the round to pitch down at the required angle to the target. Owing to the powerful control afforded by the high-lift cambered fins oriented in the inverted attitude, the pitch-down occurs very rapidly thereby minimizing the time and distance required to achieve the desired steep target engagement angle. Once the desired path angle is achieved, the canards roll the unit to the upright orientation and the round continues to fly to the target with the guidance unit in that attitude.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.
Although embodiments of various methods and devices are described herein in detail with reference to certain versions, it should be appreciated that other versions, embodiments, methods of use, and combinations thereof are also possible. Therefore the spirit and endoscope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/468,864 filed May 10, 2012 issuing on Mar. 15, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,285,196, which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/486,143, filed on May 13, 2011. The disclosure of the Provisional patent application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4373688 | Topliffe | Feb 1983 | A |
4561611 | Sinclair | Dec 1985 | A |
4568039 | Smith | Feb 1986 | A |
5186420 | Beauchamp | Feb 1993 | A |
5235930 | Pendleton | Aug 1993 | A |
5393011 | Dunn | Feb 1995 | A |
5452864 | Alford | Sep 1995 | A |
7412930 | Smith | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7475846 | Schroeder | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7923671 | Huguenin et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7963442 | Jenkins | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8026465 | Fraysse, Jr. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8113118 | Schmidt | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8324544 | Palani | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8426788 | Geswender | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010039898 | Bar | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050151000 | Dodu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20080001023 | Schroeder | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006736 | Banks | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080308671 | Harnoy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315032 | Harnoy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090114763 | Geck | May 2009 | A1 |
20100147992 | Mock | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100275805 | Rastegar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282895 | Geswender | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110073705 | Huguenin | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110180655 | Deschatre | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110285886 | Kato | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140312162 | Geswender | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 35 785 | Apr 1995 | DE |
0506536 | May 1995 | EP |
WO-2010016967 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2010039322 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160273895 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61486143 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13468864 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 15069720 | US |