The present disclosure relates to unguided, ground-launched projectiles and in particular to a system for accurately guiding ground projectiles such as Guided Mortar Bombs (GMBs) and artillery shells. Many entities manufacture such unguided projectiles in various sizes and forms. Armed forces around the world maintain large inventories of these munitions.
By their nature, unguided projectiles are “dumb” in that they are not accurately guided to a target. As a result, successful use of such projectiles is largely dependent on the particular skill and experience level of the person launching the projectile. To overcome these limitations, various schemes for providing automatic guidance to these devices have been developed, including the guidance unit that is the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 9,285,196 (issued Mar. 15, 2016) entitled “Ground-Projectile Guidance System”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Once systems as these can accurately guide the munitions to the target, the opportunity arises to enable the munition to achieve greater ranges. The unique range extension unit described in the following accomplishes this.
Disclosed is a device configured to extend the range of a projectile such as, for example, a standard Guided Mortar Bomb (GMB). The device can be used to increase the effective range of a projectile and also to improve the accuracy of the projectile against targets at short range. The disclosed system includes a range extension unit, which is a device that can be attached to a standard GMB. When attached, the range extension unit adds aerodynamic lift to the GMB to extend/increase the range of the GMB in comparison to the GMB without the range extension unit being equipped. The range extension unit includes a set of wings that can be transitioned between a retracted state and a deployed state. When attached to the GMB, the range extension unit provides the entire structure with a center of gravity that is relatively closely positioned to an aerodynamic center of the wing.
In one aspect, there is disclosed a range extension unit for a guided mortar bomb, comprising: a housing interface defining an internal cup that receives a rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, the housing interface covering a rear portion of the mortar bomb in the area between a start of an aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb and a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear of the mortar bomb, such that the housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb; and at least two deployable wings attached to the housing interface, wherein the wings transition between a retracted state and a deployed state.
In another aspect, there is disclosed a method of extending a range of a mortar bomb, comprising: providing a mortar bomb; inserting a rear region of a mortar bomb into a housing interface of a range extension unit, the housing interface defining an internal cup that receives a rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, and such that the housing interface covers a rear portion of the mortar bomb in the area between a start of an aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb and a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear of the mortar bomb, and such that the housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively forms an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb, wherein the range extension unit includes at least two deployable wings attached to the housing interface.
The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Disclosed herein is a device configured to extend the range of a projectile such as, for example, a standard Guided Mortar Bomb (GMB). The device can be used to increase the effective range of a projectile and also to improve the accuracy of the projectile against targets at short range. The disclosed system includes a range extension unit, which is a device that can be attached to a standard GMB. When attached, the range extension unit adds aerodynamic lift to the GMB to extend/increase the range of the GMB in comparison to the GMB without the range extension unit being equipped. The range extension unit includes a set of wings that can be transitioned between a retracted state and a deployed state. When attached to the GMB, the range extension unit provides the entire structure with a center of gravity that is relatively closely positioned to an aerodynamic center of the wing.
Note that the body does not have any wing or fin structures forward of the tail section (112). The stock tail section (112) includes a propulsion charge stem that extends in a rearward direction from the stock mortar bomb body (111) to mount a propulsion charge (112a) and stabilizing fin set (112b) that includes a plurality of fins fixedly mounted to the structure. The propulsion charge stem extends from an attachment point at the rear of the GMB.
A nose-mounted guidance unit (113) is mounted on a front region of the GMB. An example of a nose-mounted guidance unit (113) is described in detail below.
The GMB body can vary somewhat with the particular make of GMB. When coupled to the GMB (115), the REU (114) and GMB (115) collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body. The stem (116) in this example is an elongated, cylindrical structure that extends rearwardly from the GMB body. The stem (116) can be modified to provide minimum aerodynamic effect, but may also be removably ejected entirely upon exiting the muzzle of a firing device as the stem does not necessarily contribute appreciably to stability or lift of the device.
With reference again to
The relatively close location of the REU wings (309) to the center of gravity (120) allows the REU wings (309) to generate required lift without excessive (negative) pitching moment so as to allow the guidance unit's aerodynamic surfaces to generate sufficient net (positive) pitching moment to sustain angles of attack necessary to achieve extended range. Yet, owing to the size of the high aspect ratio wings, adequate pitch and directional stability is achieved without the need for tailfins.
This is in contrast with other approaches such as extending tailfins located at the stock tailfin position which are intended to provide additional lift for range extension but owing to their far-aft location produce negative pitching moments of such a magnitude to suppress the ability of the control unit to trim the projectile at a desired angle of attack to achieve range extension.
In use, the REU (114) is attached to the GMB (115) by inserting the rear region of the GMB into the interface member (121) of the REU. In this manner, the GMB and REU collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body. As mentioned, when the REU is mounted on the GMB, the REU provides deployable wings along a location of the GMB that would otherwise be unused (i.e., that location would not have wings). In addition, the stem of the GMB extends rearwardly and is positioned rearwardly from the wing such as that the rearmost location of the GMB. The REU can be secured to the GMB such as by mating threads on the GMB with corresponding threads within the interface member of the REU.
The GMB projectile with REU (114) unit is launched from a standard mortar tube as depicted in
The guidance unit 113 may be equipped with a computer readable memory that is loaded with one or more software applications for controlling the guidance of the projectile 915. Moreover, the guidance unit 113 may be equipped with any of a variety of electro-mechanical components for effecting guidance and operation of the projectile. The components for effecting guidance can vary and can include, for example, a global positioning system (GPS), laser guidance system, image tracking, etc. The guidance unit 113 may also include an guidance-integrated fuse system for arming and fusing an explosive coupled to the projectile 915.
The configuration of the projectile 915 may vary. For example, the projectile 915 may be a tail-fin-stabilized projectile (TSP), such as a mortar bomb or artillery shell. Such an embodiment of a projectile includes one or more fins fixedly attached to the tail of the projectile. In another example, the projectile 915 is a spin-stabilized projectile (SSP). It should be appreciated that the projectile 915 may vary in type and configuration.
With reference still to
The guidance unit 113 is configured to achieve proportional actuation in a manner that makes the guidance unit 113 capable of surviving the extremely high loads associated with a gun-launched projectile. In this regard, a motor is mounted inside the front housing within a bearing that is rigidly attached to the housing, as described below. The bearing effectively provides an inertial shield over the motor such that the motor is free to rotate relative to the mortar body about the longitudinal axis A. This configuration advantageously reduces or eliminates inertial loads that are experienced during launch and/or flight from being transferred to the motor. Without such an inertial shield, the motor can experience loads during launch that have been shown to increase the likelihood of damage or destruction of the motor.
The motor 605 is mechanically coupled to the canards 1120 via the drive shaft 1410 and a geared plate 1415. The plate 1415 is mechanically coupled to the drive shaft 1410 via a geared teeth arrangement. In this manner, the plate 1415 translates rotational movement of the drive shaft 1410 to corresponding rotational movement of a shaft 1425. The shaft 1425 is coupled to the canards 1120. The motor 1415 can be operated to move the canards 1120 in a desired manner such as to achieve proportional actuation each canard 1120.
With reference still to
Guidance of Tail-Fin-Stabilized Projectile
As mentioned, the guidance unit 113 is configured to provide control over a TSP. In this regards, the guidance unit 113 controls a TSP using roll-to-turn guidance by differentially actuating the canards 1120 to achieve differential movement between one canard and another canard on the projectile 915. Such proportional actuation of the canards can be used to achieve a desired roll attitude while collectively actuating the canards to apply a pitching moment to achieve a desired angle of attack and lift. The cambered shape (
Guidance of Spin-Stabilized Projectile
The guidance unit is further configured to provide control over a SSP. The physical hardware of the guidance unit for an SSP can be identical to that used for a TSP. As mentioned, the airfoil profile can also differ between the SSP and TSP. The guidance software used for the SSP guidance may also be configured differently. For guidance of an SSP, the guidance unit 113 is alternately oriented in a vertical and horizontal orientation, as shown in
In use, the projectile 915 with guidance unit 113 is launched from a standard mortar tube. The guidance unit 113 controls its trajectory to the target according to guidance laws that assure optimum use of the available energy imparted at launch to reach maximum range and achieve steep-angle target engagement. It employs roll-to turn guidance to laterally steer to the target and to control the orientation of the unit relative to earth to optimize trajectory shaping in elevation
During the ascent and ingress portion of the trajectory, the cambered canards are differentially deflected to establish and maintain the control unit in the upright position (roll angle=0). Collective deflection of the fins serves to cause the mortar bomb to assume an angle of attack corresponding to maximum lift-to-drag ratio, which translates into the flattest glide ratio (distance traveled to height lost) in order to maximally extend the range of the round.
This condition is maintained until the line of sight angle to the target approaches a pre-set target engagement dive angle, at which point the fins are once again differentially deflected to cause the control unit to invert (roll angle=180 degrees) and collectively deflected to cause the round to pitch down at the required angle to the target. Owing to the powerful control afforded by the high-lift cambered fins oriented in the inverted attitude, the pitch-down occurs very rapidly thereby minimizing the time and distance required to achieve the desired steep target engagement angle. Once the desired path angle is achieved, the canards roll the unit to the upright orientation and the round continues to fly to the target with the guidance unit in that attitude.
While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.
Although embodiments of various methods and devices are described herein in detail with reference to certain versions, it should be appreciated that other versions, embodiments, methods of use, and combinations thereof are also possible. Therefore the spirit and endoscope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/209,253 entitled “Ground-Projectile Guidance System” and filed on Aug. 24, 2015. Priority to the aforementioned filing date is claimed and the provisional patent application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3265329 | Postelson | Aug 1966 | A |
3556239 | Spahn | Jan 1971 | A |
3868883 | Tucker | Mar 1975 | A |
3876925 | Stoeckert | Apr 1975 | A |
4163904 | Skendrovic | Aug 1979 | A |
4168759 | Hull et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4334657 | Mattson | Jun 1982 | A |
4373688 | Topliffe | Feb 1983 | A |
4423368 | Bussiere | Dec 1983 | A |
4424042 | Gongwer | Jan 1984 | A |
4434718 | Kopsch | Mar 1984 | A |
4438893 | Sands et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4477040 | Karanik | Oct 1984 | A |
4512537 | Sebestyen et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4561611 | Sinclair | Dec 1985 | A |
4565340 | Bains | Jan 1986 | A |
4568039 | Smith et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4587803 | Nightingale et al. | May 1986 | A |
4917332 | Patterson, Jr. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923143 | Steuer et al. | May 1990 | A |
5141173 | Lay | Aug 1992 | A |
5150859 | Ransick | Sep 1992 | A |
5186420 | Beauchamp et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5235930 | Pendleton | Aug 1993 | A |
5238204 | Metz | Aug 1993 | A |
5297764 | Haney | Mar 1994 | A |
5386146 | Hickey | Jan 1995 | A |
5393011 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5452864 | Alford | Sep 1995 | A |
5490572 | Tajiri et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505587 | Ghetzler | Apr 1996 | A |
5680032 | Pena | Oct 1997 | A |
5934612 | Gerhardt | Aug 1999 | A |
6138781 | Hakala | Oct 2000 | A |
6237496 | Abbott | May 2001 | B1 |
6270309 | Ghetzler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6373145 | Hamrick | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6695252 | Dryer | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700215 | Wu | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6838782 | Vu | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857492 | Liskey et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6897575 | Yu | May 2005 | B1 |
7354017 | Morris | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7412930 | Smith et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7475846 | Schroeder | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497287 | Kunikata et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7665554 | Walsh | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7752976 | Banks | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7789182 | Bradley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7923671 | Huguenin et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7963442 | Jenkins et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982328 | Huntemann | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8026465 | Fraysse, Jr. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8113118 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8220392 | Maldonado | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8237096 | Alexander | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8324544 | Palani et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8426788 | Geswender | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8434574 | York et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8509992 | Bosworth | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8640589 | Dryer | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8653688 | Justak et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674277 | Axford | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678310 | Masoudipour et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686330 | Johansson | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8710691 | Haddad | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8790068 | Cantwell | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791588 | Steinlechner | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814081 | Gagne et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8911703 | McAlister | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8967302 | Tran | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9021961 | Manole | May 2015 | B1 |
9285196 | Harris | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9371739 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9546854 | Harris et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9670899 | Steinlechner | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9745960 | Dietzel | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9828110 | Rogues | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9957060 | Riordan | May 2018 | B2 |
20010039898 | Bar et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020066608 | Guenard et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020153178 | Limonius | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030209370 | Maberry | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040084908 | Vu | May 2004 | A1 |
20050029027 | Kunikata et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050098361 | Mitchell | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151000 | Dodu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060113118 | Kim | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070089918 | Gonzalez | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070284155 | Cong | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001023 | Schroeder | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006736 | Banks | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080169133 | Tomoyasu | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080223977 | Dryer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080308671 | Harnoy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315032 | Harnoy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090026770 | Huntemann | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090114763 | Geck et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133943 | Noguchi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100147992 | Mock | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100275805 | Rastegar et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100282895 | Geswender | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110033280 | Justak | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110073705 | Huguenin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110100731 | Hassan | May 2011 | A1 |
20110101698 | Saluccio | May 2011 | A1 |
20110180655 | Deschatre | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110285886 | Kato et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297783 | Martinez | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120006938 | Gatzke | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120048991 | Frey, Jr. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120160957 | Gagne et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120217338 | Flood et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120248239 | Geswender | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120299558 | Justak et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120301273 | Justak | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130048780 | Masoudipour et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130158828 | McAlister | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130248657 | Riordan | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140002756 | Huang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027563 | Harris et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140193236 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140312162 | Geswender et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150128636 | McAlister | May 2015 | A1 |
20170101884 | Harris et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170219324 | Harris et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4335785 | Apr 1995 | DE |
0506536 | May 1995 | EP |
1 092 941 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2172462 | Aug 2001 | RU |
WO-2008010226 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2010016967 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO-2010039322 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170191809 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62209253 | Aug 2015 | US |