Ground-projectile guidance system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11371814
  • Patent Number
    11,371,814
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 23, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 28, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A range extension unit extends the range of a guided mortar bomb. The range extension unit includes a housing interface defining an internal cup that receives a rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, wherein the housing interface covers a rear portion of the mortar bomb. The housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively forms an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb. At least two deployable wings are attached to the housing interface, wherein the wings transition between a retracted state and a deployed state.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to unguided, ground-launched projectiles and in particular to a system for accurately guiding ground projectiles such as Guided Mortar Bombs (GMBs) and artillery shells. Many entities manufacture such unguided projectiles in various sizes and forms. Armed forces around the world maintain large inventories of these munitions.


By their nature, unguided projectiles are “dumb” in that they are not accurately guided to a target. As a result, successful use of such projectiles is largely dependent on the particular skill and experience level of the person launching the projectile. To overcome these limitations, various schemes for providing automatic guidance to these devices have been developed, including the guidance unit that is the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 9,285,196 (issued Mar. 15, 2016) entitled “Ground-Projectile Guidance System”, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Once systems as these can accurately guide the munitions to the target, the opportunity arises to enable the munition to achieve greater ranges. The unique range extension unit described in the following accomplishes this.


SUMMARY

Disclosed is a device configured to extend the range of a projectile such as, for example, a standard Guided Mortar Bomb (GMB). The device can be used to increase the effective range of a projectile and also to improve the accuracy of the projectile against targets at short range. The disclosed system includes a range extension unit, which is a device that can be attached to a standard GMB. When attached, the range extension unit adds aerodynamic lift to the GMB to extend/increase the range of the GMB in comparison to the GMB without the range extension unit being equipped. The range extension unit includes a set of wings that can be transitioned between a retracted state and a deployed state. When attached to the GMB, the range extension unit provides the entire structure with a center of gravity that is relatively closely positioned to an aerodynamic center of the wing.


In one aspect, there is disclosed a range extension unit for a guided mortar bomb, comprising: a housing interface defining an internal cup that receives a rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, the housing interface covering a rear portion of the mortar bomb in the area between a start of an aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb and a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear of the mortar bomb, such that the housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb; and at least two deployable wings attached to the housing interface, wherein the wings transition between a retracted state and a deployed state.


In another aspect, there is disclosed a method of extending a range of a mortar bomb, comprising: providing a mortar bomb; inserting a rear region of a mortar bomb into a housing interface of a range extension unit, the housing interface defining an internal cup that receives a rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, and such that the housing interface covers a rear portion of the mortar bomb in the area between a start of an aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb and a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear of the mortar bomb, and such that the housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively forms an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb, wherein the range extension unit includes at least two deployable wings attached to the housing interface.


The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a Guided Mortar Bomb (GMB) or munition without a Range Extension Unit (REU).



FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a guided munition having the subject REU attached to the munition.



FIGS. 3A and 3B shows the REU attached to the projectile with wings in a retracted configuration and an extended configuration, respectively.



FIG. 4 shows an example mechanism of attachment of a guidance kit and REU to a munition with a standard tail interface.



FIG. 5A shows a side-view drawing of the GMB equipped with a stock mortar tail REU.



FIG. 5B shows a side view drawing of the GMB equipped with the REU of this disclosure.



FIGS. 6A-6D show an example mechanism for extending the wings from a stowed configuration to an extended configuration.



FIG. 7 shows the REU residing in a mortar gun prior to firing.



FIG. 8 shows the REU at muzzle exit from the mortar gun during or after firing.



FIG. 9 shows a perspective view of a guidance unit that couples to a projectile.



FIG. 10 shows the guidance unit uncoupled from the projectile.



FIG. 11 shows an enlarged view of the guidance unit.



FIG. 12 shows an airfoil shape of a cambered canard.



FIG. 13 shows an airfoil shape of a symmetric canard.



FIGS. 14A and 14B shows a perspective view of a portion of the front housing in partial cross-section.



FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrates how a projectile may be guided by differential deflection of canards.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein is a device configured to extend the range of a projectile such as, for example, a standard Guided Mortar Bomb (GMB). The device can be used to increase the effective range of a projectile and also to improve the accuracy of the projectile against targets at short range. The disclosed system includes a range extension unit, which is a device that can be attached to a standard GMB. When attached, the range extension unit adds aerodynamic lift to the GMB to extend/increase the range of the GMB in comparison to the GMB without the range extension unit being equipped. The range extension unit includes a set of wings that can be transitioned between a retracted state and a deployed state. When attached to the GMB, the range extension unit provides the entire structure with a center of gravity that is relatively closely positioned to an aerodynamic center of the wing.



FIG. 1 shows a Guided Mortar Bomb (115) that includes a stock mortar bomb body (111) with stock tail section (112) at one end of the mortar bomb body (111). The stock mortar bomb body (111) is an elongated structure having an aerodynamic shape. For example, the body (111) can have a tapered front section that increases in diameter toward a maximum diameter middle section and then gradually decreases in diameter to form a decreasing slope moving toward the tail section (112), particularly a propulsion charge stem attached to the body (111) at an attachment point at the rear of the body. The mortar bomb thus has a maximum cross-section dimension that, moving rearward, starts an aft-sloping part that slopes toward a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear end of the body (111). The REU, when attached to the bomb body, is positioned on or over the aft-sloping part that slopes toward the root of the propulsion charge stem attachment point. The REU and GMB collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body when attached to one another.


Note that the body does not have any wing or fin structures forward of the tail section (112). The stock tail section (112) includes a propulsion charge stem that extends in a rearward direction from the stock mortar bomb body (111) to mount a propulsion charge (112a) and stabilizing fin set (112b) that includes a plurality of fins fixedly mounted to the structure. The propulsion charge stem extends from an attachment point at the rear of the GMB.


A nose-mounted guidance unit (113) is mounted on a front region of the GMB. An example of a nose-mounted guidance unit (113) is described in detail below.



FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a range extension unit (REU) (114) coupled to a GMB (115). The REU (114) is a structure that fits on to the GMB (such as on a rear portion of the GMB) to provide the GMB with a set of wings that are positioned on the GMB at a location that is otherwise unused without the presence of the REU. The REU 114 includes a conical housing (307) (described below) supporting two or more fasteners, such as clevises (308), that house and protect two or more extendable wings (309) and which are attached to the GMB body. The wings (309) are movably attached to the structure, such that the wings can move between a retracted position and an extended position with the extended position shown in FIG. 2.


The GMB body can vary somewhat with the particular make of GMB. When coupled to the GMB (115), the REU (114) and GMB (115) collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body. The stem (116) in this example is an elongated, cylindrical structure that extends rearwardly from the GMB body. The stem (116) can be modified to provide minimum aerodynamic effect, but may also be removably ejected entirely upon exiting the muzzle of a firing device as the stem does not necessarily contribute appreciably to stability or lift of the device.



FIGS. 3A and 3B shows the REU (114) attached to the GMB (115). As mentioned, the REU (114) transitions between a first, pre-fire configuration wherein the set of wings is stowed or otherwise nested against the body of the REU, and as second, post-fire or flight configuration in which the set of wings are extended or deployed such that they are positioned outwardly relative to the body of the REU. FIG. 3B shows the wings in the extended or deployed state such that the wings are positioned to provide lift to the body when in movement.



FIG. 4 shows the device in an exploded state and illustrates how the guidance unit (113) and the REU (114) attaches to a munition (119) to convert the munition (119) into a GMB (115). The munition (119) is a passive, aerodynamic body. As shown, the REU (114) includes an interface, such as a cup shaped interface member (121) that includes or defines an internal cavity or seat into which a rear portion of the GMB (115) can be inserted. The internal seat of the interface (121) has a shape that complements the outer shape of the rear portion of the munition (119) so that the munition (119) can flit flush into the interface (121). In this manner, the REU (114) attaches to a rear portion of the GMB (115) to convert the device into an extended range precision-guided projectile (ERGMB), as described in detail below. In the illustrated embodiment, the interface member (121) fixedly attaches to a mounting structure or coupling region (117) at the rear of the munition (119). The coupling region (117) can be coupled, attached, or otherwise secured to the REU (114) in any of a variety of manners. In an example embodiment, the coupling region (117) has outer threads such that it can be threaded into a complementary threaded region of the interface member (121) of the REU (114). It should be appreciated, however, that other manners of coupling the guidance unit (113) to the munition (119) are within the scope of this disclosure.


With reference again to FIG. 2, two or more or more wings (309) are housed within the clevises (308) attached to the conical structure (307) of the REU (114). The wings are mechanized to be automatically spring-deployed in response to the initial setback shock load produced by the mortar gun propellant charge (gun-launch) or by lanyard or other first motion means (air-launch). The wings (309) are configured to provide aerodynamic lift when trimmed at an angle of attack set by the GMB's (115) control system, thereby increasing the REGMB's lift-to-drag ratio, which intern increases range capability.



FIGS. 5A and 5B show side views of the devices and show the relative positions of the aerodynamic center of lift of the rear lifting surfaces relative to the center of gravity (120) of the entire airframe for both the GMB (115) equipped with stock tailfins (112) with tail surface aerodynamic center (122) (as shown in FIG. 3A) and the GMB (115) equipped with an REU (114) and wing center of lift (121) (as shown in FIG. 3B). Unlike other, conventional approaches (e.g., extending tailfins) the REU's (114) aerodynamic center of lift (121) is located relatively close to the center of gravity (120) of the munition (119).


The relatively close location of the REU wings (309) to the center of gravity (120) allows the REU wings (309) to generate required lift without excessive (negative) pitching moment so as to allow the guidance unit's aerodynamic surfaces to generate sufficient net (positive) pitching moment to sustain angles of attack necessary to achieve extended range. Yet, owing to the size of the high aspect ratio wings, adequate pitch and directional stability is achieved without the need for tailfins.


This is in contrast with other approaches such as extending tailfins located at the stock tailfin position which are intended to provide additional lift for range extension but owing to their far-aft location produce negative pitching moments of such a magnitude to suppress the ability of the control unit to trim the projectile at a desired angle of attack to achieve range extension.



FIGS. 6A-6D depict an example, non-limiting mechanism to deploy the wings upon first motion following detonation of the mortar propellant charge. The root of each wing is mounted on a shaft (123) attached across the vertical walls of the clevis (308) and is powered by a spiral spring (124) and retained by a lead pin (125) which is aligned in an axial (launch) direction. Upon charge detonation of the firing device, the lead pin (125) experiences a load (e.g., several thousand times the force of gravity) under which load it self-extracts from its bore, releasing the wing (308) to move to the extended state. Once released during launch initiation, the tips of the wings slide along a gun bore, at which time the combination of spring force and aerodynamic drag of the forward-deploying wings, extends the wings to full open, extended positions immediately as the projectile exits the firing device, such as a gun. This is a non-limiting example of how this deployment may be mechanized for mortar gun applications. It should be appreciated, however, that other methods of wing deployment are within the scope of this disclosure and may also be used in air-drop variants of this system.


In use, the REU (114) is attached to the GMB (115) by inserting the rear region of the GMB into the interface member (121) of the REU. In this manner, the GMB and REU collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body. As mentioned, when the REU is mounted on the GMB, the REU provides deployable wings along a location of the GMB that would otherwise be unused (i.e., that location would not have wings). In addition, the stem of the GMB extends rearwardly and is positioned rearwardly from the wing such as that the rearmost location of the GMB. The REU can be secured to the GMB such as by mating threads on the GMB with corresponding threads within the interface member of the REU.


The GMB projectile with REU (114) unit is launched from a standard mortar tube as depicted in FIG. 7 and FIG. 8, or from an airborne platform such as an airborne platform having 5 in launch tubes or a UAV. FIG. 7 shows the projectile with REU (114) inside the mortar tube prior to launch, while FIG. 8 shows the projectile with REU (114) as it being propelled from the mortar tube. The guidance unit controls its trajectory to the target according to guidance laws that assure optimum use of the available energy imparted at launch to reach maximum range and achieve steep-angle target engagement. It may employ roll to turn or some other form of guidance algorithm to steer the REGMB to the target and to control the orientation of the unit relative to earth to optimize trajectory shaping.



FIG. 9 shows a perspective view of a nose-mounted guidance unit 113 coupled to a ground-launched projectile 915. FIG. 10 shows the guidance unit 113 uncoupled from the projectile 915. The projectile 915 is an unguided projectile in that the projectile itself does not include any components for guiding the projectile 915 to a target. As shown in FIG. 10, the guidance unit 113 attaches to the projectile 915 to convert the projectile 915 into a precision-guided projectile, as described in detail below. In the illustrated embodiment, the guidance unit 113 couples to a front-most end of the projectile 915. In this regard, the guidance unit 113 has an outer housing that forms a bullet-nosed tip such that, when coupled to the projectile 915, the guidance unit 113 and projectile 915 collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body. It should be appreciated that the shape of the projectile and of the guidance unit can vary from what is shown in the figures.


The guidance unit 113 may be equipped with a computer readable memory that is loaded with one or more software applications for controlling the guidance of the projectile 915. Moreover, the guidance unit 113 may be equipped with any of a variety of electro-mechanical components for effecting guidance and operation of the projectile. The components for effecting guidance can vary and can include, for example, a global positioning system (GPS), laser guidance system, image tracking, etc. The guidance unit 113 may also include an guidance-integrated fuse system for arming and fusing an explosive coupled to the projectile 915.


The configuration of the projectile 915 may vary. For example, the projectile 915 may be a tail-fin-stabilized projectile (TSP), such as a mortar bomb or artillery shell. Such an embodiment of a projectile includes one or more fins fixedly attached to the tail of the projectile. In another example, the projectile 915 is a spin-stabilized projectile (SSP). It should be appreciated that the projectile 915 may vary in type and configuration.



FIG. 11 shows an enlarged view of the guidance unit 113. As mentioned, the guidance unit 113 includes a front housing 1105 that forms a bullet-nosed tip although the shape may vary. A coupling region 1110 is positioned at a rear region of the guidance unit 113. The coupling region 1110 can be coupled, attached, or otherwise secured to the projectile 915 (FIGS. 1 and 2) such as at a front region of the projectile. The front housing 1105 and its contents are rotatably mounted to the coupling region 1110 such that the housing 1105 (and its contents) can rotate about an axis, such as an axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis A relative to the coupling region 1110, as described in detail below. Rotation about other axes, such as about the axis A, are also possible. The longitudinal axis extends through the center of the unit 113. In the illustrated embodiment, the coupling region 1110 has outer threads such that the coupling region can be threaded into a complementary threaded region of the projectile 915. It should be appreciated, however, that other manners of coupling the guidance unit 113 to the projectile 915 are within the scope of this disclosure.


With reference still to FIG. 11, two or more control surfaces, such as canards 1120, are positioned on the front housing 1105 of the guidance unit 113. The canards are configured to be proportionally actuated for accurate guidance of the projectile 915 during use, as described in more detail below. That is, an internal motor in the housing 1105 is configured to move the canards in a controlled manner to provide control over a trajectory of the projectile 915. The canards 1120 are configured to aerodynamically control the roll and pitch orientation of the projectile 915 with respect to an earth reference frame. In this regard, the canards can be cambered as shown in FIG. 12 or the canards can be symmetric as shown in FIG. 13. The cambered airfoil can be used for mortar bombs and tail-fin-stabilized artillery shells, while for symmetric airfoil can be used for spin-stabilized projectiles. Any of a variety of airfoil configurations are within the scope of this disclosure.


The guidance unit 113 is configured to achieve proportional actuation in a manner that makes the guidance unit 113 capable of surviving the extremely high loads associated with a gun-launched projectile. In this regard, a motor is mounted inside the front housing within a bearing that is rigidly attached to the housing, as described below. The bearing effectively provides an inertial shield over the motor such that the motor is free to rotate relative to the mortar body about the longitudinal axis A. This configuration advantageously reduces or eliminates inertial loads that are experienced during launch and/or flight from being transferred to the motor. Without such an inertial shield, the motor can experience loads during launch that have been shown to increase the likelihood of damage or destruction of the motor.



FIG. 14A shows a perspective view of a portion of the front housing 1105 of the guidance unit 113. FIG. 14A shows the guidance unit 113 in partial cross-section with a portion of the device shown in phantom for clarity of reference. FIG. 14B shows the guidance unit in partial cross-section. As discussed above, the canards 1120 are mounted on the outer housing 1105. A motor 605 is positioned inside the housing 1105 within a bearing 1430, which shields the motor 605 from inertial loads during launch, as described below. In the illustrated embodiment, the motor 605 is a flat motor although the type of motor may vary. The motor 605 drives a drive shaft 1410 by causing the drive shaft 1410 to rotate.


The motor 605 is mechanically coupled to the canards 1120 via the drive shaft 1410 and a geared plate 1415. The plate 1415 is mechanically coupled to the drive shaft 1410 via a geared teeth arrangement. In this manner, the plate 1415 translates rotational movement of the drive shaft 1410 to corresponding rotational movement of a shaft 1425. The shaft 1425 is coupled to the canards 1120. The motor 1415 can be operated to move the canards 1120 in a desired manner such as to achieve proportional actuation each canard 1120.


With reference still to FIGS. 6A and 6B, the motor 605 is positioned inside a bearing 1430 that is rigidly and fixedly attached to the housing 1105. That is, the bearing 1430 is attached to the housing 1105 in a manner such that any rotation of the housing 1105 is transferred to the bearing 1430. Thus, when the housing 1105 rotates, such as a result of loads experience during launch, the bearing also rotates along with the housing 1105. However, the motor 1430 does not necessarily rotate as the bearing 1430 prevents or reduces rotational movement and corresponding loads from being transferred to the motor 1430. The bearing arrangement thereby shields the motor 605 from loads on the housing 1105 during launch and ballistic movement. It has been observed that the ground-launched projectiles may experience loads on the order of 10,000 to 25,000 during launch. The configuration of the guidance unit advantageously protects the motor against such loads.


Guidance of Tail-Fin-Stabilized Projectile


As mentioned, the guidance unit 113 is configured to provide control over a TSP. In this regards, the guidance unit 113 controls a TSP using roll-to-turn guidance by differentially actuating the canards 1120 to achieve differential movement between one canard and another canard on the projectile 915. Such proportional actuation of the canards can be used to achieve a desired roll attitude while collectively actuating the canards to apply a pitching moment to achieve a desired angle of attack and lift. The cambered shape (FIG. 12) of the canard airfoil maximizes the achievable angle of attack. It has been shown that about 8 to 10 degrees of angle of attack yields maximum lift-to-draft ratio, which maximizes the projectile's glide ratio, thereby extending its range.


Guidance of Spin-Stabilized Projectile


The guidance unit is further configured to provide control over a SSP. The physical hardware of the guidance unit for an SSP can be identical to that used for a TSP. As mentioned, the airfoil profile can also differ between the SSP and TSP. The guidance software used for the SSP guidance may also be configured differently. For guidance of an SSP, the guidance unit 113 is alternately oriented in a vertical and horizontal orientation, as shown in FIGS. 15A and 15B, by differential deflection of the canards. Once the guidance unit is established in one of a vertical or horizontal position, the motor 605 is operated to deflect the canards proportionally to apply the required amount of vertical or horizontal force to steer the projectile in such a manner as to continually keep it aligned along a pre-determined trajectory to the target. The amount of time spent in each of these orientations and the magnitude of the deflection during that period are determined in software according to the detected position and velocity deviations from the desired trajectory.


In use, the projectile 915 with guidance unit 113 is launched from a standard mortar tube. The guidance unit 113 controls its trajectory to the target according to guidance laws that assure optimum use of the available energy imparted at launch to reach maximum range and achieve steep-angle target engagement. It employs roll-to turn guidance to laterally steer to the target and to control the orientation of the unit relative to earth to optimize trajectory shaping in elevation


During the ascent and ingress portion of the trajectory, the cambered canards are differentially deflected to establish and maintain the control unit in the upright position (roll angle=0). Collective deflection of the fins serves to cause the mortar bomb to assume an angle of attack corresponding to maximum lift-to-drag ratio, which translates into the flattest glide ratio (distance traveled to height lost) in order to maximally extend the range of the round.


This condition is maintained until the line of sight angle to the target approaches a pre-set target engagement dive angle, at which point the fins are once again differentially deflected to cause the control unit to invert (roll angle=180 degrees) and collectively deflected to cause the round to pitch down at the required angle to the target. Owing to the powerful control afforded by the high-lift cambered fins oriented in the inverted attitude, the pitch-down occurs very rapidly thereby minimizing the time and distance required to achieve the desired steep target engagement angle. Once the desired path angle is achieved, the canards roll the unit to the upright orientation and the round continues to fly to the target with the guidance unit in that attitude.


While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention that is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results.


Although embodiments of various methods and devices are described herein in detail with reference to certain versions, it should be appreciated that other versions, embodiments, methods of use, and combinations thereof are also possible. Therefore the spirit and endoscope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.

Claims
  • 1. A range extension unit for a guided mortar bomb, comprising: a housing interface defining an internal cup that receives a rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, the housing interface covering the rear portion of the mortar bomb in the area between a start of an aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb and a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear portion of the mortar bomb, such that the housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively forms an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb, and wherein the aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb starts at a maximum-diameter longitudinal mid-section of the mortar bomb and extends rearward toward a rear end of the mortar bomb;at least two deployable wings attached to the housing interface, wherein the wings transition between a retracted state and a deployed state, wherein the range extension unit has no active propulsion system; andthe guided mortar bomb coupled to the housing interface, wherein the guided mortar bomb and the coupled housing interface both fit entirely into a tubular mortar tube, the guided mortar bomb including a stem extending rearwardly out of the guided mortar bomb, the stem being an elongated cylindrical body, a majority of the stem being entirely enclosed by the housing interface.
  • 2. The range extension unit of claim 1, wherein the housing interface includes a set of devises that house the deployable wings and that attach the deployable wings to the housing interface.
  • 3. The range extension unit of claim 1, wherein the deployable wings increase a range and stability of the mortar bomb when the range extension unit is attached to the mortar bomb.
  • 4. The range extension unit of claim 1, further comprising a spring-action mechanism that automatically transition the wings to the deployed state upon first motion of the mortar bomb from a launch device.
  • 5. The range extension unit of claim 1, wherein range extension unit and the guided mortar bomb have a center of gravity that is closer to an aerodynamic center of the guided mortar bomb than when the range extension unit is not mounted on the guided mortar bomb.
  • 6. The range extension unit of claim 1, wherein the stem extends rearwardly through the housing interface when the guided mortar bomb is received within the housing interface.
  • 7. The range extension unit of claim 1, further comprising a guidance unit positionable on a front end of the mortar bomb.
  • 8. The range extension unit of claim 7, wherein the guidance unit comprises: a housing, the housing having a bullet-nosed region and an attachment region, wherein the attachment region inserts into the mortar bomb, wherein the bullet-nosed region of the housing rotates relative to the attachment region of the housing;a motor contained within the housing;a bearing surrounding the motor such that the motor is contained entirely within the bearing, the bearing being rigidly attached to the housing such that the motor rotates with the housing and shields the motor from inertial loads experienced by the housing, wherein the bearing rotates about an axis perpendicular to a long axis of the mortar bomb.
  • 9. A method of extending a range of a mortar bomb, comprising: providing a mortar bomb;inserting a rear portion of a mortar bomb into a housing interface of a range extension unit to form a projectile, the housing interface defining an internal cup that receives the rear portion of a guided mortar bomb, and such that the housing interface covers the rear portion of the mortar bomb in the area between a start of an aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb and a root of a propulsion charge stem attachment point at the rear portion of the mortar bomb, and such that the housing interface, when coupled to the mortar bomb, collectively form an aerodynamically shaped body with the mortar bomb, wherein the range extension unit includes at least two deployable wings attached to the housing interface, and wherein the aft-sloping part of the mortar bomb starts at a maximum-diameter longitudinal mid-section of the mortar bomb and extends rearward toward a rear end of the mortar bomb, wherein the range extension unit has no active propulsion system, wherein the mortar bomb includes a stem extending rearwardly out of the mortar bomb, the stem being an elongated cylindrical body, a majority of the stem being entirely enclosed by the housing interface; andinserting the projectile into a mortar tube.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the wings are located on a location of the mortar bomb that would otherwise not have wings were the range extension unit not attached to the mortar bomb.
REFERENCE TO PRIORITY DOCUMENT

This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/209,253 entitled “Ground-Projectile Guidance System” and filed on Aug. 24, 2015. Priority to the aforementioned filing date is claimed and the provisional patent application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (126)
Number Name Date Kind
3265329 Postelson Aug 1966 A
3556239 Spahn Jan 1971 A
3868883 Tucker Mar 1975 A
3876925 Stoeckert Apr 1975 A
4163904 Skendrovic Aug 1979 A
4168759 Hull et al. Sep 1979 A
4334657 Mattson Jun 1982 A
4373688 Topliffe Feb 1983 A
4423368 Bussiere Dec 1983 A
4424042 Gongwer Jan 1984 A
4434718 Kopsch Mar 1984 A
4438893 Sands et al. Mar 1984 A
4477040 Karanik Oct 1984 A
4512537 Sebestyen et al. Apr 1985 A
4561611 Sinclair Dec 1985 A
4565340 Bains Jan 1986 A
4568039 Smith et al. Feb 1986 A
4587803 Nightingale et al. May 1986 A
4917332 Patterson, Jr. Apr 1990 A
4923143 Steuer et al. May 1990 A
5141173 Lay Aug 1992 A
5150859 Ransick Sep 1992 A
5186420 Beauchamp et al. Feb 1993 A
5235930 Pendleton Aug 1993 A
5238204 Metz Aug 1993 A
5297764 Haney Mar 1994 A
5386146 Hickey Jan 1995 A
5393011 Dunn et al. Feb 1995 A
5452864 Alford Sep 1995 A
5490572 Tajiri et al. Feb 1996 A
5505587 Ghetzler Apr 1996 A
5680032 Pena Oct 1997 A
5934612 Gerhardt Aug 1999 A
6138781 Hakala Oct 2000 A
6237496 Abbott May 2001 B1
6270309 Ghetzler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6373145 Hamrick Apr 2002 B1
6695252 Dryer Feb 2004 B1
6700215 Wu Mar 2004 B2
6838782 Vu Jan 2005 B2
6857492 Liskey et al. Feb 2005 B1
6897575 Yu May 2005 B1
7354017 Morris Apr 2008 B2
7412930 Smith et al. Aug 2008 B2
7475846 Schroeder Jan 2009 B2
7497287 Kunikata et al. Mar 2009 B2
7665554 Walsh Feb 2010 B1
7752976 Banks Jul 2010 B2
7789182 Bradley et al. Sep 2010 B2
7923671 Huguenin et al. Apr 2011 B1
7963442 Jenkins et al. Jun 2011 B2
7982328 Huntemann Jul 2011 B2
8026465 Fraysse, Jr. Sep 2011 B1
8113118 Schmidt et al. Feb 2012 B2
8220392 Maldonado Jul 2012 B1
8237096 Alexander Aug 2012 B1
8324544 Palani et al. Dec 2012 B2
8426788 Geswender Apr 2013 B2
8434574 York et al. May 2013 B1
8509992 Bosworth Aug 2013 B1
8640589 Dryer Feb 2014 B2
8653688 Justak et al. Feb 2014 B2
8674277 Axford Mar 2014 B2
8678310 Masoudipour et al. Mar 2014 B2
8686330 Johansson Apr 2014 B2
8710691 Haddad Apr 2014 B2
8790068 Cantwell Jul 2014 B2
8791588 Steinlechner Jul 2014 B2
8814081 Gagne et al. Aug 2014 B2
8911703 McAlister Dec 2014 B2
8967302 Tran Mar 2015 B2
9021961 Manole May 2015 B1
9285196 Harris Mar 2016 B2
9371739 Robinson et al. Jun 2016 B2
9546854 Harris et al. Jan 2017 B2
9670899 Steinlechner Jun 2017 B2
9745960 Dietzel Aug 2017 B2
9828110 Rogues Nov 2017 B2
9957060 Riordan May 2018 B2
20010039898 Bar et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020066608 Guenard et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020153178 Limonius Oct 2002 A1
20030209370 Maberry Nov 2003 A1
20040084908 Vu May 2004 A1
20050029027 Kunikata et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050098361 Mitchell May 2005 A1
20050151000 Dodu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060113118 Kim Jun 2006 A1
20070089918 Gonzalez Apr 2007 A1
20070284155 Cong Dec 2007 A1
20080001023 Schroeder Jan 2008 A1
20080006736 Banks Jan 2008 A1
20080169133 Tomoyasu Jul 2008 A1
20080223977 Dryer Sep 2008 A1
20080308671 Harnoy Dec 2008 A1
20080315032 Harnoy Dec 2008 A1
20090026770 Huntemann Jan 2009 A1
20090114763 Geck et al. May 2009 A1
20090133943 Noguchi et al. May 2009 A1
20100147992 Mock Jun 2010 A1
20100275805 Rastegar et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282895 Geswender Nov 2010 A1
20110033280 Justak Feb 2011 A1
20110073705 Huguenin et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110100731 Hassan May 2011 A1
20110101698 Saluccio May 2011 A1
20110180655 Deschatre Jul 2011 A1
20110285886 Kato et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110297783 Martinez Dec 2011 A1
20120006938 Gatzke Jan 2012 A1
20120048991 Frey, Jr. Mar 2012 A1
20120160957 Gagne et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120217338 Flood et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120248239 Geswender Oct 2012 A1
20120299558 Justak et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301273 Justak Nov 2012 A1
20130048780 Masoudipour et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130158828 McAlister Jun 2013 A1
20130248657 Riordan Sep 2013 A1
20140002756 Huang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140027563 Harris et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140193236 Robinson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140312162 Geswender et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150128636 McAlister May 2015 A1
20170101884 Harris et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170219324 Harris et al. Aug 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
4335785 Apr 1995 DE
0506536 May 1995 EP
1 092 941 Aug 2005 EP
2172462 Aug 2001 RU
WO-2008010226 Jan 2008 WO
WO-2010016967 Feb 2010 WO
WO-2010039322 Apr 2010 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170191809 A1 Jul 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62209253 Aug 2015 US