The disclosure relates generally to the reinforcement of ground supporting a load structure, such as a tank, for instance a LNG tank, or other load structures such as nuclear plants, notably in seismic zones subject to soil liquefaction.
When a saturated, loose sandy or silty soil undergoes a dynamic stress, such as during an earthquake, it loses strength and stiffness while the pore water pressure in the ground increases, and can behave as a liquid. This phenomenon is called soil liquefaction.
Effects of soil liquefaction can cause lateral spreading of the foundation soil and/or significant damage to structures such as buildings, industrial structures, roads or bridges.
Some techniques are known to mitigate the damaging effects of soil liquefaction. They include:
The present inventors have recognized that certain improvements can be made in the existing devices and methods. For example, one problem that the inventors have identified is that available solutions are either not fully accepted by the engineering and scientific community, or they do not offer sufficient shear strength, load bearing or settlement reduction for the supported structure. For example, draining may be efficient but some have doubts on its long-term efficiency and such a method may not support heavy structures. Soil densification may not be adapted to certain soil and loads. The mechanism involved for mitigation of liquefaction by increasing the shear strength are not yet fully accepted. Therefore there is no one cost-effective encompassing solution that has all the advantages to tackle liquefaction, whatever the soil type or mechanism considered, and that is able to support significant structural loading, prevent lateral spreading and control settlements.
In one aspect, there is provided a soil reinforcing device for reinforcing a ground supporting a load structure, wherein said soil reinforcing device comprises a first assembly including:
The inventors have found that some draining devices can also generate a densification of the soil within the cells, which enhances the capacity of the cells to reduce the settlement. The association of cells and draining devices enable to significantly reduce soil liquefaction below the load structure during an earthquake, while also providing an increased bearing capacity to support the structure above.
In one aspect, the replacement ratio of each draining device is comprised between 5% and 12%, preferentially about 8%/10%.
In one aspect, each cell comprises one draining device.
In one aspect, each cell comprises vertical walls.
Preferentially, each cell comprises six vertical walls, and the cell mesh forms a honeycomb-type structure.
In one aspect, said vertical walls are connected to each other by linking columns.
In one aspect, said linking columns are jet-grouted columns or concrete columns.
In one aspect, the draining devices are separated from the vertical walls.
In one aspect, the vertical walls comprise a mixture of cut ground with a binder.
In one aspect, the draining devices extend in the middle of said cells.
In one aspect, said draining devices extend deeper than said cells.
In one aspect, the draining devices comprise stone columns.
In one aspect, the soil reinforcing device comprises a second assembly that includes exterior columns, wherein said second assembly, considered in a horizontal plane, surrounds the first assembly.
In one aspect, said exterior columns comprise exterior stone columns.
In yet another aspect, there is provided a system comprising the soil reinforcing device according to the invention.
In one aspect, the load structure has a load structure diameter; the first assembly has a first assembly diameter; and the first assembly diameter is greater than the load structure diameter.
In one aspect, the load structure is a LNG tank.
In yet another aspect, there is provided a method for making a soil reinforcing device according to the invention, comprising forming the cells using a in situ soil-mixing technique.
Reference is made to the accompanying figures in which:
Referring to
Of course, the load structure could be another structure than a LNG tank, such as other tanks (water, oil, . . . ), heavy industrial structures (storage and bulk storage structures, processing plant, . . . ), infrastructures (bridges, embankments, . . . ).
Reinforced ground G may be, for example, made of silty sand.
As better visible on
Without departing from the scope of the disclosure, the external diameter of the reinforcing device could be between 0% and 60% of the diameter of the load structure, for example.
The reinforcing device 10 comprises a first assembly 18 surrounded by a second assembly 20. As can be seen, the diameter of the second assembly may correspond to the external diameter D1 of the reinforcing device.
As can be seen in
The first assembly 18 may comprise a plurality of cells 22 extending vertically and forming a cell mesh 24. In this non-limiting example, each cell 22 may comprise six vertical walls 26 so that the cell mesh 24 forms a honeycomb-type structure. In this exemplary embodiment, the first assembly comprises 253 cells.
Turning now to
In this example, the vertical walls 26 comprise a mixture of cut ground with a binder. The vertical walls 26 in one desirable embodiment can be made using a soil-mixing technique in which the ground is cut and mixed in situ with a binder.
In this non-limiting example, the vertical walls 26 have a height H1 of about 20 meters, a thickness of about 600 mm and a length of about 2800 mm.
The linking columns 28 may be jet-grouted columns. In other words, the linking columns 28 may be made using a jet-grouting technique. Such a technique is known in the art and will not be detailed here.
The diameter of the jet-grouting columns may have a diameter of about 1400 mm and a height H2 of about 30 meters. In other words, the linking columns 28 may extend deeper that the vertical walls 26. The distance between two adjacent linking columns may be, for example, about 3600 mm.
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
Moreover, in this example the replacement ratio of the draining device is about 6 to 7%.
Turning now to
The second assembly 20 includes exterior columns 32 which may be regularly spaced one from each other. In other words, the exterior columns may be distributed homogeneously around the first assembly 18.
In this non-limiting example, the exterior columns 32 comprise exterior stone columns. Said stone columns have a height H3 of about 20 meters, and a diameter of about 750 mm.
A system E comprising the soil reinforcing device 10 and the LNG tank 14, where the first assembly diameter is greater that the LNG tank diameter may also be implemented.
Throughout the description, including the claims, the term “comprising a” should be understood as being synonymous with “comprising at least one” unless otherwise stated. In addition, any range set forth in the description, including the claims should be understood as including its end value(s) unless otherwise stated. Specific values for described elements should be understood to be within accepted manufacturing or industry tolerances known to one of skill in the art, and any use of the terms “substantially” and/or “approximately” and/or “generally” should be understood to mean falling within such accepted tolerances.
Where any standards of national, international, or other standards body are referenced (e.g., ISO, etc.), such references are intended to refer to the standard as defined by the national or international standards body as of the priority date of the present specification. Any subsequent substantive changes to such standards are not intended to modify the scope and/or definitions of the present disclosure and/or claims.
Additionally, even though some features, concepts or aspects of the inventions may be described herein as being a preferred arrangement or method, such description is not intended to suggest that such feature is required or necessary unless expressly so stated. Moreover, while various aspects, features and concepts may be expressly identified herein as being inventive or aiming part of an invention, such identification is not intended to be exclusive, but rather there may be inventive aspects, concepts and features that are fully described herein without being expressly identified as such or as part of a specific invention, the invention instead being set forth in the appended claims.
It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2966761 | May 2017 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4242013 | Watts | Dec 1980 | A |
4804293 | Varkonyi | Feb 1989 | A |
4828431 | Chen | May 1989 | A |
4965097 | Bach | Oct 1990 | A |
5482408 | Lunardi | Jan 1996 | A |
5800090 | Goughnour | Sep 1998 | A |
5934837 | Lee | Aug 1999 | A |
6318031 | Nakamura | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6395372 | Bach | May 2002 | B1 |
7033118 | Hilfiker | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7048473 | Takemiya | May 2006 | B2 |
7993080 | Erez | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8459903 | Senf | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8790036 | Halahmi | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8920068 | Free | Dec 2014 | B1 |
20050117978 | Loffel | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060147276 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080253845 | Takeuchi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090324346 | Milton | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100254795 | Halahmi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20130209179 | Erez | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Sondermann et al., Ground improvement to reduce the liquefaction potential around pile foundations; Oct. 2011 (Year: 2011). |
Babu et al., A Critical Review of Construction, Analysis and Behaviour of Stone Columns; Sep. 2012 (Year: 2012). |
Dash et al.; Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress; Sep. 2013 (Year: 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180327994 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |