This application claims priority from Canadian patent application No. 2,563,135 filed Oct. 11, 2006 and Canadian patent application No. 2,573,995 filed Jan. 16, 2007.
This invention relates to supporting and firmly anchoring vertical posts, such as fence posts and mailbox posts, in the ground.
When installing a vertical post, such as a fence post, it is common to support the post in the ground by one of: (1) burying one end of the post in a hole dug in the ground; (2) filling the area around the base of the post with concrete; or (3) securing the post to a ground spike post support that, in turn, is secured into the ground.
Burying one end of the post in the ground is often unsatisfactory for various reasons, including that digging out a suitable hole and burying the post may be difficult and the ground may not provide suitable support. This may result in a wobbly post that is not well suited for anchoring a fence or the like.
Filling the area around the base of the post with concrete has its own limitations. This requires digging suitable holes around each post, acquiring sufficient concrete to set each post, mixing concrete, pouring concrete into holes around each post, and ensuring that the post is held straight while the concrete sets.
Securing posts to post support means, such as metal ground spikes, is a relatively easy and cost efficient alternative for securing a post to the ground.
Metal ground spikes of varying shapes have been used to secure posts to the ground. U.S. Pat. No. 4,271,646 to Mills discloses a prior art metal post support (2) having a ground engaging blade portion (4) and a post supporting hollow box portion (6) as shown in
A second common ground spike (20) is illustrated in
The post socket portion (30) is made from a unitary piece of metal that is cut in the shape shown in
The blade portion (21) is attached to the post socket portion (30) by welding between the top of each blade (22) and the lower face of the base tabs (35).
The blade portion (21) and post socket portion (30) of the common ground spike (20) are typically made of the same metal material, often having a thickness of between 2.5 mm and 3.5 mm. Mills discloses use of steel having a thickness of one-eighth inch (3.2 mm). The cost of the metal starting material is a major component of the cost of producing a ground spike. Reducing the thickness of metal for the prior art ground spikes cause premature deformations and failures under normal to heavy wear conditions.
There exists a need for a stronger, improved ground spike design, preferably that requires less metal such that it can be manufactured for a lower cost without sacrificing product quality.
The invention will be described by reference to the detailed description of the invention and to the drawings thereof in which:
Throughout the following description specific details are set out to provide a more thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced without these particulars. In other instances, well known elements have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention. Accordingly, the description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.
With reference to
The blade portion 41 of embodiment 40 is made from two pieces of metal, each having been cut as shown in
The welds may comprise spot welds. In certain embodiments, regular welds are applied at the top and bottom of the join 45 and spot welds are applied in 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or more positions along join 45.
To facilitate the welding process, discrete apertures may be cut along fold lines 43 and 44. The discrete apertures can coincide with the portions to be welded so that the weld may be applied from a single side of the blades.
If the outer edges of the blades are bent due to the stamping of reinforcement lines, the edge of the blades may be straightened, such as by mechanical straightening. This can occur before or after the bending of the blade material.
In alternate embodiments, the blade portion may be constructed without folding by welding individual blade pieces together along join 45.
The post supporting socket portion 50 comprises four side walls 51 that are in a substantially perpendicular arrangement to each other. Reinforcement lines 55 may be stamped or otherwise marked in each side wall 51. The reinforcement lines 55 may be concentrated on the lower portion of the socket portion 50, or may extend further up the side walls 51. One, two, three, or more reinforcement lines 55 may be applied to each side wall 51.
Clamping tabs 56 may be provided on one or more corners of the socket portion 50. The clamping tabs may take one of various forms known in the art. Examples of differently shaped clamping mechanisms can be seen with reference to embodiments 80, 82, and 84 shown in
A ground spike according to the present invention may comprise a web, wherein the web may comprise a base plate 60. Base plate 60 is preferably formed of a unitary piece of metal to be secured to each of the four sides of the socket portion 50. As shown in
Reinforcement lines 62 may be stamped into socket base plate 60 for increased strength and rigidity, which may increase the resistance of the base plate 60 to torsion forces.
Once the blade portion 41, the socket portion 50, and the socket base plate 60 have been manufactured as described above, embodiment 40 is further assembled by welding each of the four sides 65 of the socket base plate to a side wall 51 of the socket portion 50. For example, side 65A may be welded to side wall 51A, and side 65B may be welded to side wall 51B, etc. The length of the weld between each side 65 and side wall 51 is almost the entire depth D of each side wall 51.
The length L of the blades may be any suitable length, for example between 40 and 10 inches, or more preferably between 32 and 24 inches. The length of the blades portion 41 may be varied according to the soil conditions of the application.
The width W of the blades may be any suitable length for a given application. Where the application is for supporting a 4×4 post, which is generally 3.5″ by 3.5″ wide, the inside depth D of each side wall 51 of the socket portion 50 may be slightly more than 3.5″. In this case the width W will be the same or less than the distance between opposing sides 65 of the square 61 defined by plate 60 if the blades 42 are welded to the plate 60 at angles parallel to the sides 65. In embodiments where the blades 42 are parallel to the sides 65, width W will be between 3.5″ and 2.5″, and more preferably between 3.5″ and 3″, and most preferably between 3.5″ and 3.3″. In embodiments where the blades 42 are welded to the plate 60 at approximately 45 degree angles to the sides 65 (i.e. the top surface of the blades extend towards the corners of square 61), then width W must be the same or less than the length of a diagonal line that would extend from corner to opposite corner of the square 61. For supporting a 4×4 post that is 3.5″ by 3.5″ wide, the diagonal line 69 extending between opposite corners of square 61 may be about 5″. For embodiments with blades welded to plate 60 generally along diagonal line 69, the width W will be between 5″ and 2.5″, preferably between 5″ and 4″ and more preferably between 4.9″ and 4.5″.
The blades taper from the top to the bottom, such that the width T at the tip of the blades is significantly less than the width W at the top of the blade portion.
It is noted that the width W, which is illustrated in
Height H of the socket portion 50 may be any suitable height. If height H is too high, the post support will not be suitable for constructing certain fences because dogs, raccoons or other animals may fit under the fence. For 4×4 post installations, height H may be between 6.5″ to 4″ or more preferably between 4.75″ and 5.75″, and most preferably between 5″ and 5.5″.
Plate 60′ has tabs 74 that may be folded perpendicular to the flat surface 70 along lines 72. Plate 60′ may be welded to the side walls 51 of the socket portion 50 along one or both of the fold line 72 and the outer edge of tab 74.
Socket portion 50′ shows alternate embodiments for clamping tabs 56′ in which the entire tab, that may have two apertures 58, remains as a single piece of material. The corners 59 of the clamping tabs 56′ may or may not be removed. Rounded corners may increase the safety of handling the ground spike.
Width W of the blade portion 41 may be varied to fit on plate 60. The distance 78 between the closest top edge corner of the blade portion 41 and the side wall 51 (measured along a line that continues in the plane of the blade) may be between 0 mm and 40 mm, preferably between 0 mm and 25 mm, and more preferably between 0 mm and 15 mm.
Although various clamping mechanisms have been described, embodiment 86 illustrates a post support with no clamping mechanism. The side walls can be welded together to form a join in place of the clamping mechanism.
Different orientations of the blades can be seen with reference to
Embodiment 40 has two reinforcement lines on the plate 60, whereas embodiments 82, 90 and 92 do not have reinforcement lines on the plate.
Top views of alternate embodiments are shown in
Embodiment 92 shown in
Embodiment 94 is an adjustable ground spike, having two domes 96 and 97 sitting in place of the base plate 60. A bolt 99 and nut 98 arrangement allows adjustment of the orientation of the socket from the blades portion during installation. This may be advantageous during installation, particularly if the blades are not driven into the ground straight. The socket may have an opening 95 to allow access by a wrench or other device to adjust and tighten the head of the bolt during installation. Domes 96 and 97 may be any suitable thickness, such as between 3.0 mm and 9.0 mm, and more preferably between 5.0 mm and 7.5 mm. The domes 96 and 97 may be stamped with reinforcement lines, whether concentric circles or lines that radiate outward. Reinforcement lines can be stamped in the blades and in the socket.
Embodiment 100 is an example of a post support that could be set in concrete. This type of post support does not require a blade portion. However the socket 50 and the plate 60 could be constructed in the same manner.
Embodiment 102 is an example of a post support that can be bolted down to a surface, such as a concrete surface or a wooden deck. The socket may be constructed as in embodiment 40. The plate may extend outward beyond the socket walls.
Embodiments 104 and 106 are examples of post supports having plates 108 that extend outward beyond the socket walls. Embodiment 106 also shows an alternate pattern for the construction of the blade elements. Reinforcement lines can be placed in some or all of the blades, socket and plate 108 in embodiments 104 and 106.
Post support ground spikes are installed by placing a short post segment into the post socket, then hammering the post segment, which in turn drives the post support into the ground. No digging or mixing concrete is involved.
Different portions of the ground spike may be made of different types of metal, whether that be different alloys, different coatings on the metal, different treatments of the metal, and/or different thicknesses of metal. Early test results of the invention indicate that the portion of the ground spike that requires the thickest and/or strongest material is the base plate 60. Test results further indicate that the portion of the ground spike that requires the least strength and/or may permit the least thickness is the socket portion 50, with the blade portion 41 requiring an intermediate strength and/or thickness of metal.
Test results also indicate that the socket portion 50 requires the most strength at and near the weld to the base plate 60. For this reason, the reinforcement lines 55 in embodiment 40 only appear at or near the area in which the side walls 51 are welded to the base plate 60. The reinforcement lines 55 may be raised slightly above the area in which the base plate 60 is welded so that there is no gap in the weld between the plate 60 and the side walls 51.
The top one to two thirds of the blade portion require the most rigidity and the most resistance to torsion. The tips of the blades 48 also must be relatively strong to avoid distortion when hitting rocks or other hard items when driven into the ground.
It is possible to weld additional pieces onto the blades, below the reinforcement lines, to add extra rigidity to the blade portion. This may be particularly useful when trying to minimize the thickness of the blades and yet are unable to stamp suitable reinforcement lines in certain sections of the blades, or where certain portions of the blades require extra reinforcement.
In alternate embodiments, reinforcement lines may be added, where practicable, to any portion of the ground spike without departing from the invention. The nature and pattern of the reinforcement lines, as well as the thickness of the lines and the depths of the contours may be varied.
It is to be understood that base plate 60 may be referred to as a web, which is a broader term. The term web may encompass base plate 60 alone or in conjunction with any other portion of the ground spike connected to base plate 60.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the first and second embodiments have been described above in some detail but that certain modifications may be practiced without departing from the principles of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2563135 | Oct 2006 | CA | national |
2573995 | Jan 2007 | CA | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2007/001814 | 10/11/2007 | WO | 00 | 4/10/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/046200 | 4/24/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4249715 | Repp | Feb 1981 | A |
4588157 | Mills | May 1986 | A |
4651399 | Moraly | Mar 1987 | A |
4874149 | Miceli | Oct 1989 | A |
D316367 | Olson | Apr 1991 | S |
5090656 | Brown | Feb 1992 | A |
D325870 | Niles | May 1992 | S |
5230187 | Reimann | Jul 1993 | A |
5287671 | Ueki | Feb 1994 | A |
D349434 | Archambeau | Aug 1994 | S |
5456441 | Callies | Oct 1995 | A |
5632464 | Aberle | May 1997 | A |
5927677 | Speece et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6039298 | Steir | Mar 2000 | A |
6273390 | Meyer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
7219872 | Walker | May 2007 | B2 |
D579585 | Walker et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
20050279896 | Callies | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0144870 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0657604 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1461802 | Jan 1977 | GB |
2140839 | Dec 1984 | GB |
2151273 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2152550 | Aug 1985 | GB |
2153403 | Aug 1985 | GB |
2195373 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2207451 | Feb 1989 | GB |
2225038 | May 1990 | GB |
2268523 | Jul 1992 | GB |
2284435 | Dec 1993 | GB |
2277754 | Nov 1994 | GB |
2283994 | May 1995 | GB |
2295628 | Jun 1996 | GB |
2322877 | Mar 1997 | GB |
2355996 | Nov 1999 | GB |
2360301 | Jun 2003 | GB |
242387 | May 1994 | NZ |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090313916 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |