This invention relates generally to an electrical connection and more specifically to an electrical connection for an automotive vehicle employing a grounding stud.
It is common to arc weld an elongated circular end of a threaded metal stud onto a sheet metal body panel of an automotive vehicle. Various parts are then inserted upon the single threaded stud and an internally threaded nut is rotationally inserted onto the stud. Conventional threaded weld studs have also been employed as electrical grounding points for a vehicle wire harness to an engine compartment frame or body panel. It is also known to employ a grounding weld stud that has a threaded portion, a circular flanged portion and a hexagonal shoulder portion for receiving an eyelet. This hexagonal shoulder configuration, however, provides undesirably large corner-to-corner and flat-to-flat dimensions across the shoulder in order to fit within standard stud welding machinery which can only handle a certain maximum outside diameter of stud; thus, the hexagonal shoulder leads to insufficient cross sectional area for electrical conductivity.
Screws have also been used to retain an electrical eyelet to a grounding panel. Conventional eyelets, having a circular inside aperture, often require upturned tabs to prevent rotation of the eyelets during installation of nuts for the stud construction or where screws are installed. This adds extra cost and complexity to the eyelet and installation process. Wire orientation is important for engine compartment use to prevent vehicle vibration from rotating the wire and loosening the nut, and to prevent wire pinching. One such example of a conventional orientation configuration is U.S. Pat. No. 5,292,264 entitled “Earthing Stud” which issued to Blank on Mar. 8, 1994, which discloses a threaded weld stud, interlocking plastic orientation part, and a cable terminal or eyelet; this patent is incorporated by reference herein. Another traditional construction is disclosed in EP 0 487 365 B1 to Rapid S.A.
In accordance with the present invention, a preferred embodiment of an electrical connection employs a stud having a patterned segment, a shoulder and a flange. In another aspect of the present invention, the shoulder has seven or more predominantly flat faces. In a further aspect of the present invention, the shoulder has an octagonal cross sectional shape. Still another aspect of the present invention provides a nut which is threadably engaged with the patterned segment of the stud and an eyelet secured between the nut and the flange of the stud. Yet another aspect of the present invention allows the stud to be welded onto an automotive body panel or the like for use as a grounding stud.
The stud and electrical connection of the present invention are advantageous over traditional devices in that the present invention maximizes the electrical contact area between the stud and the eyelet while also providing a set angular orientation to the eyelet and wire once the nut has been fastened onto the stud. The present invention also improves the electrical cross sectional area through the stud while also allowing for the manufacture of the stud in conventionally sized equipment. The preferred octagonal cross sectional shape of the shoulder advantageously increases automatic alignment of the eyelet, especially when the eyelet has a matching octagonal internal aperture shape, as compared to stud shoulders having six or less flat faces. The stud of the present invention advantageously accepts both an octagonally apertured eyelet for use as a grounding stud or a circularly apertured eyelet for use in other electrical stud connections such as to a junction box, battery or the like. Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
Stud 51 includes a securing segment 62, a flange 63, a shoulder 64, a patterned segment 65, an inwardly tapered segment 67 and an anti-cross threading lead-in end segment 68. Securing segment 62 has a hexagonal cross sectional shape with a centrally raised button. This portion forms the weld pool of material when stud 51 is drawn arc welded to panel 33. Flange 63 has a circular peripheral shape and transversely extends beyond the rest of stud 51. A unthreaded and reduced diameter neck 122 of stud 51 is located between the threaded segment and the shoulder, as shown in
Shoulder 64 is defined by a set of generally flat faces 71 that are connected together and surround a longitudinal centerline 73 of stud 51. It is important that shoulder 64 has more than six distinctly separate and angularly offset faces that are connected together in a polygonal manner when viewed in cross section. It is preferred that faces 71 of shoulder 64 define an octagonal shape in cross section. Rounded upper corners 73 are located between portions of each adjacent pair of faces 71. The distance D between opposed faces 71 is preferably between 6.13 and 6.0 millimeters. Patterned segment 65 has a M 6.0×1.0 millimeter spiraling thread. The thread defines an external engagement pattern on the stud. Stud 51 is made as an integral single piece from 10B21, heat treated class 8.8 steel. Anti-cross threading segment 68 is of the type disclosed in one or more of the following U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,001 entitled “Anti-Cross Threading Fastener” which issued to Goodwin et al. on Dec. 19, 2000; U.S. Pat. No. 6,022,786 entitled “Anti-Cross Treading [sic] Fastener Lead-In Point” which issued to Garver et al. on May 16, 2000; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,730,566 entitled “Anti-Cross Threading Fastener” which issued to Goodwin et al. on Mar. 24, 1998; all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The preferred embodiment eyelet 61 has an internal aperture 75 defined by an octagonally shaped edge. Aperture 75 of eyelet 61 closely matches the size of shoulder 64; close dimensional tolerances of aperture 75 and shoulder 64 are important.
Nut 53 has a circular-cylindrical, enlarged section 81 and a coaxial, reduced section 83. A hexagonal cross sectional shape is externally provided on reduced section 83 while a spiral thread is internally disposed within reduced section 83 for engaging the threads of stud 51. Enlarged section 81 has a flanged end 85 which abuts against and compresses eyelet 61 against flange 63 of stud 51, when nut 53 is rotatably tightened by a torque wrench or the like upon stud 51. In the fully fastened position, enlarged section 81 of nut 53 externally surrounds and covers at least part of shoulder 64. Alternately, nut 53 is of a progressive torque, crown lock variety.
In the electrical grounding stud application, stud 51, with nut 53 preassembled to prevent e-coat and paint incursion, is first welded to panel 33. Subsequently, nut 53 is removed. Next, eyelet 61 is manually placed around threaded segment 65 of stud 51. Nut 53 is thereafter rotatably driven onto stud. The rotation of nut 53 will cause the octagonal aperture 75 of eyelet 61 to become automatically aligned with the matching faces of the octagonal shoulder 64, thereby allowing a fixed orientation of eyelet 61 and wire 57 relative to stud 51. Nut 53 is then fully torqued onto stud. It is believed that the octagonal shape maximizes the face-to-face dimension D and also the corner-to-corner dimension of shoulder 64. Notwithstanding, the cross sectional dimensions of shoulder 64 still allow for manufacturing of stud 51 in conventionally sized processing equipment. Additionally, the octagonal cross sectional shape of shoulder 64 allows for reduced circumferential rotation or angular displacement of the corresponding eyelet before alignment is achieved, especially compared to hexagonal or square cross sectional shapes.
An alternate embodiment eyelet 91 is shown in
While the preferred embodiment grounding stud and electrical connection have been disclosed, it should be appreciated that other aspects can be employed within the scope of the present invention. For example, the securing segment of the stud can alternately have a screw thread, be suitable for spot welding or have an interference fit type push in configuration to the adjacent panel or member. Additionally, the internal nut threads can be replaced by inwardly projecting formations that are in a non-spiral configuration. Furthermore, nut 53 can be replaced by a crimped on collar. The stud electrical connection can also be used for non-automotive apparatuses such as household appliance, power tools or industrial machines. While various materials have been disclosed, other materials may be employed. It is intended by the following claims to cover these and any other departures from the disclosed embodiments which fall within the true spirit of this invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 10/075,090, filed Feb. 12, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,746,285, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/270,084, filed Feb. 20, 2001, both of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4002390 | Perry et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4192215 | Hymans | Mar 1980 | A |
4936796 | Anderson, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
5207588 | Ladouceur et al. | May 1993 | A |
5292264 | Blank | Mar 1994 | A |
5413500 | Tanaka | May 1995 | A |
5442133 | Arnold et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5462453 | Muller | Oct 1995 | A |
5644830 | Ladouceur et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655936 | Meredith | Aug 1997 | A |
5707257 | Kotajima et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5730566 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5775930 | Model et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5868535 | Ladouceur | Feb 1999 | A |
6027382 | Reindl et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6062786 | Garver et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071153 | Fink et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077096 | Moring et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6127628 | Baur et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142813 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162001 | Goodwin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162085 | Chugh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168445 | Seutschniker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171146 | Fink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176746 | Morello et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179658 | Gunay et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203364 | Chupak et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210186 | Fink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213795 | Drescher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6244517 | Courtois et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247965 | Cummings et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250975 | LaPointe | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6276960 | Schaefer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6305957 | Fink et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322376 | Jetton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6329592 | Auclair | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338651 | Svette, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6357110 | Shipp et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361356 | Heberlein et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379162 | Raypole et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383033 | Politsky et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406307 | Bungo et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416119 | Gericke et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422881 | Puhl et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6485318 | Schoepf | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485337 | Hsieh | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491487 | Wojciechowski | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494751 | Morello et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508666 | Francis | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527573 | Stein, Sr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533611 | Morello et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537099 | Herlinger et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6547605 | Daugherty et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565372 | Bakker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6607339 | Mangapora | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607393 | Raypole et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6746285 | Delcourt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20020115317 | Delcourt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030017391 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
44 25 839 | Jan 1996 | DE |
0 487 365 | May 1992 | EP |
0 533 421 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 540 030 | May 1993 | EP |
0 915 531 | May 1999 | EP |
62-5569 | Jan 1987 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040253853 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60270084 | Feb 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10075090 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10842641 | US |