This invention relates to a grout pack restraining system, more particularly to a restraining system for a yielding grout pack.
The support of the hanging wall in mining stopes is one of the most basic requirements in mining. Dependent on the type and quality of rock being supported, the depth of mining, the prevalent field stresses, seismicity, stoping width and a number of other factors, stope support can vary across a vast range of materials, configurations and systems. These include, among others, gum poles, timber and composite packs, steel props, back-fill paddocks, unmined ore pillars, hanging wall rock anchors and any combination of the above.
Grout packs are among the increasingly utilized combination support products consisting essentially of a support column formed by a geotextile bag holding cured cemented back-fill or a similar cured cementious grout that is resistant to compression. The geotextile bag is usually protected and supported against lateral dilation of the pack under load by a wire or polymer mesh, as well as a set of additional wire or polymer rings surrounding the bag and mesh horizontally. The grout column is usually combined with timber poles that are required to suspend the bag, net and ring assembly prior to filling with grout.
For the purpose of this background discussion, the structural and support contribution of the timber poles to the behavior and performance of the grout pack shall be disregarded.
Under vertical (axial) load the grout column reduces in length and dilates laterally according to the Poisson's ratio of the grout material. Besides the cohesion of the cemented material, the geotextile bag (a), the surrounding mesh (b), as well as the restraining rings (c) all contribute in some measure to the support resistance of the pack in that they restrain the lateral dilation of the grout column.
(a) The geotextile material is usually woven or knitted from low tenacity polymer fibres and offers little lateral confinement as it stretches easily under load. Although it will provide some useful confinement, its primary function is to provide suitable containment for the grout slurry with optimal drainage and filtering properties.
(b) The secondary mesh basically forms a support structure for the geotextile material, preventing excessive bulging (with the associated increased solids losses through the enlarged pores) under hydrostatic loading of the uncured grout slurry. To add some degree of yieldability to the cured pack, the netting wires (or fibres) are usually oriented at 45° to the axis of the pack allowing the mesh to stretch in the horizontal direction, providing some additional lateral confinement to the pack.
(c) The lateral restraining rings are the major structural confinement of the pack and their strengths contribute directly and significantly to the support resistance of the pack. In conventional grout packs the performance of these rings is essentially dependent on their material properties, characterized primarily by their tensile strength and elongation. Invariably there is a trade-off in terms of these properties in that higher tensile strength generally goes with lower elongation and vice versa.
In stope support the stiffness of a support unit has to be carefully considered, however, as stronger and stiffer is not necessarily better, particularly in seismic stress environments where, under dynamic loading, shear stresses in the hanging wall around a very stiff pack can exceed the strength of the rock resulting in hanging wall failure (“punching”). Under such conditions, a yielding support unit should be able to absorb large and/or sudden rock movement without losing its structural integrity. Similarly, high closure stopes also require yieldability to safely absorb the energy of the closing hanging wall.
In conventional grout packs, the width-to-height ratio of the grout columns is insufficient to generate their own cemented material confinement under compression and the simple tendon lateral restraining rings, as described in (c) above are, therefore, the only significant lateral confinement of these packs.
It is these rings that largely control the compression behaviour of the packs. At present, however, they do not permit adequate yielding of the packs from an unyielded initial condition to a fully yielded condition as they rely solely on material deformation to permit yielding. Yield is thus determined by the quality of the steel used for the elements. After expansion permitted by the material yield of the elements the elements break and expansion becomes uncontrolled.
In this specification, yield refers to two separate concepts:
It is an object of this invention to provide a grout pack restraining system which will at least partially alleviate the above-mentioned problem.
In accordance with this invention there is provided a grout pack restraining system which includes a plurality of elongate elements shaped to extend about a grout pack and characterized in that the elements are configured to control circumferential expansion of the grout pack beyond the expansion permitted through material yield of the elements.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided for the elongate elements to be configured to include rings of at least a first diameter and a second diameter, the first diameter being smaller than the second and selected to provide restraint in an unyielded condition.
Further features of the invention provide for the rings to have a helical configuration; alternatively for the rings to be concentric, and for the rings of the second diameter to be secured to the rings of the first diameter.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided for the elongate elements to include rings configured to have a diameter which can be increased under predetermined radial force.
Further features provide for the rings to have overlapping ends; for at least one collar to be provided over the overlapping ends to provide frictional resistance to relative movement of the overlapping ends; for a collar to be provided at each end; for the collar to be a ferrule, alternatively a chain link with its longitudinal axis inclined to that of the elongate element.
Still further features of the invention provide for the elongate element of each ring to be non-linear; and for there to be at least one undulation in the elongate element; alternately at least one loop in the elongate element.
The invention further provides an element for a grout pack restraining system, the element being shaped to extend about a grout pack and characterized in that it is configured to control circumferential expansion of the grout pack beyond the expansion permitted through material yield thereof.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided for the element to be configured to include rings of at least a first diameter and a second diameter, the first diameter being smaller than the second and selected to provide restraint in an unyielded condition.
Further features of the invention provide for the rings to have a helical configuration; alternatively for the rings to be concentric, and for the rings of the second diameter to be secured to the rings of the first diameter.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided for the element to include a ring configured to have a diameter which can be increased under predetermined radial force.
Further features provide for the ring to have overlapping ends; for at least one collar to the provided over the overlapping ends to provide frictional resistance to relative movement of the overlapping ends; for a collar to be provided at each end; for the collar to be a ferrule, alternatively a chain link with its longitudinal axis inclined to that of the element.
Still further features of the invention provide for the ring to be non-linear; for there to be at least one undulation in the ring; alternately at least one loop in the ring.
The invention also provides a method of restraining a grout pack which includes securing about the grout pack a plurality of elongate elements which are configured to control circumferential expansion of the grout pack beyond the expansion permitted through material yield of the elements.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provide for rings of at least a first diameter and a second diameter to be secured about the grout pack, those of the first diameter being smaller than those of the second diameter.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided for elongate elements in the form of rings configured to have a diameter which can be increased under predetermined radial force to be secured about the grout pack.
The invention will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
A first embodiment of a grout pack restraining system (1) is shown in
The rings (2,3) are concentrically arranged and secured to each other by a number of ties (5) spaced about the circumferences thereof. As shown in
In use, as shown in
At 30% closure, the ring (2a) is fully yielded, showing its maximum design yield of about 40%, whilst the ring (3a) restrains the grout pack (15) and continues yielding. The performance of the ring (2a) is assisted by the ring (3a). At 30% closure, ring (2e) is relatively undistorted with ring (3e) only commencing to restrain the grout pack (15).
The grout pack restraining system thus permits controlled circumferential expansion of the grout pack between the unyielded condition and fully yield condition. This is in major part through configuring the system to permit circumferential expansion of the grout pack beyond the expansion which would occur through simple yield of the material used in the system, in this embodiment by the provision of the rings of the second larger diameter.
It will be appreciated, however, that many other embodiments of a grout pack restraining system exists which fall within the scope of the invention, particularly as regards the material used for the rings and the cross-sectional shape thereof. Also, the rings can be secured in any convenient configuration and, as shown in
Further alternatively, as shown in
More than two rings of increasing diameter can also be used and it is not necessary for the rings to be co-axial. As shown in
Further alternatively, a pair of rings (60, 61) of first and second diameter, can be secured together using a pair of helically extending elongate elements (63, 64). This helical configuration in effect provides several restraining rings of increasing diameter and provides a much smoother transition of restraining duty from the ring of smaller diameter (60) to that of larger diameter (61).
It is, however, not necessary to use rings of different diameter to control expansion of a grout pack. Instead, a ring can be provided which can be increased in diameter through a predetermined radial force by virtue of its configuration rather than through material deformation of the material of the ring. As shown in
Under predetermined internal force on the ring (70) its diameter increases through frictional yield between the overlapping ends (73, 74) as shown in
In use, as shown in
Any suitable configuration of rings (70a to 70g) can be used. As illustrated in
Frictional expansion of the ring can also be achieved through other configurations. As illustrated in
It will also be understood that the ring (81) could be formed with the ends of the elongate element (80) overlapping as described with reference to
Further alternatively, as shown in
Furthermore, any suitable means of providing frictional resistance between overlapping ends of a ring can be used. As illustrated in
Resistance to expansion can also be achieved through use of a non-linear elongate element (110) as illustrated in
A ring (120) formed from the elongate element (110) is shown in
Similarly to the restraining systems illustrated with reference to
It will be appreciated that the rings (120a to 120g) can be paired in a meshed configuration as illustrated in
Alternatively, as shown in
The degree of expansion can be controlled by the number of undulations in the elongate element. As shown in
Also, as shown in
The grout pack retraining system of the invention thus provides a simple yet highly effective means to control circumferential expansion of a grout pack between an unyielded condition and a fully yielded condition. The elongate elements of the system are configured to permit expansion of the grout pack about which they are secured greater than the expansion permitted by simple material deformation of the elements. Many other embodiments which fall within the scope of the invention will be apparent to a person skilled in the art.
This application is a divisional of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/451,191 filed Jun. 12, 2006, the contents of which is incorporated in its entirety herein, and to which priority is claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1661238 | Sloan | Mar 1928 | A |
2990166 | Walsh | Jun 1961 | A |
3041838 | Sieben | Jul 1962 | A |
3397260 | Lamberton | Aug 1968 | A |
3525551 | Mallander | Aug 1970 | A |
3984989 | Turzillo | Oct 1976 | A |
4497597 | Chlumecky | Feb 1985 | A |
4983077 | Sorge et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5823718 | Du Plessis | Oct 1998 | A |
6196635 | Rohaly et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6394707 | Kennedy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6655877 | Calhoun | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7097389 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
20020136607 | Merz | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040096278 | Van Zyl | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090226264 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11451191 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 12396180 | US |