Grout removal tool

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6678959
  • Patent Number
    6,678,959
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 27, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 20, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A grout removal tool includes an adapter having a replaceable cutting blade mounted thereon. The adapter is configured to be installed within a common reciprocating saw. The adapter has a proximal attachment end for attachment to the saw, an elongated proximal leg extending from the proximal attachment end, and an elongated distal leg extending from the proximal leg at an angle to terminate in a distal end whereupon the cutting blade is attached. When the proximal attachment end of the adapter is installed within the reciprocating saw, the cutting blade reciprocates in a parallel plane beneath the plane in which the proximal leg reciprocates. When the cutting blade is reciprocated across a grouted work surface, it results in a high rate of grout removal with low dust dispersion.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This disclosure concerns an invention relating generally to tools for removing grout from joints between tiles and other grout-sealed surfaces, and more specifically to power tools for effecting grout removal.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the field of tile installation, removal, and renovation, it is frequently desirable to be able to remove tiles from tiled surfaces. In order to do so, the grout seals between the tiles must be removed. There are presently several known grout removal tools for performing this task.




Initially, hand-held grout removal tools are known whereby a user may guide a blade within a grout joint to manually cut or grind the grout away by use of a sawing motion. Generally, these provide an elongated handle which extends towards a blade retainer, wherein blades are removably received. While these hand-held tools are inexpensive, they are tiring and time-consuming to use. However, one advantage of manual grout removal is that it is generally less forceful and more easily controlled than when power grout removal is performed. This can be important when there is a need to avoid tile damage and preserve the tiles for reuse, e.g., in the case of rare and expensive hand-painted tiles, and/or where the tile work is intricate and requires a high degree of tool control.




Rotary-mode power grout removal tools generally involve a rotating abrasive disc which is fit into the grout joint and spun against the grout. The housing for the disc may include rollers or similar guiding apparata which help users to guide the blade along a joint and/or adjust the depth of cut. While these can rapidly remove grout, they generate a great deal of dust; for this reason, some rotary-mode grout removers incorporate vacuum systems for cleaner operation. The rotary-mode tools also have the disadvantage that they are more difficult to control and cannot be used for intricate work, and they can cause greater damage to file edges is they are not carefully used.




Vibration-mode power grout removal tools generally involve a planar chisel or blade which fits within the grouted joint, and which is then vibrated at high frequency (around 365 Hz) and low amplitude (approximately 1 mm) along an axis parallel to or perpendicular to the blade's edge. These tools are exemplified by the Fein grout removal tool, which vibrates the blade parallel to its edge and which is well known in the tile trade for its relatively dust-free operation. The blade fits within the grout joint and rapidly grinds through the grout with low damage to the surrounding tiles. Straight chisel-like blades, circular disc blades, and sickle-type blades may be interchangeably accommodated within the tool. Speed control is used to keep the speed constant under a variety of loading conditions, which is believed to enhance performance. Vibration-mode tools are generally regarded by those in the tile removal and installation trade to be the best tools available because they are “gentle” on tile, and they have low clean-up burden; unfortunately, they are also among the most expensive grout removal tools, and they are not as fast as rotary removal tools.




For competitive reasons, power grout removal is a virtual necessity for tile professionals in the present market. Manual grout removal is simply too slow (and thus too expensive) for the consumer to bear. Occasional exceptions exist, e.g., in the case where the tile professional is working on antique or fancy tiles, wherein their expense is such that the consumer is willing to pay the price of manual grout removal in order to spare the tiles. Additionally, dustless grout removal, or grout removal with minimal dust, has become increasingly important for contractors owing to the wasted time and diminished efficiency resulting from dust clean-up. Grout dust is extremely fine, is readily sent airborne for settling on distant household surfaces, and is irritating to the eyes and lungs. It is therefore desirable to have available other power grout removal tools which allow for rapid grout removal; which have minimal dust generation and dispersion; which allow for a high degree of control, so that they may be used with intricate tile work; and which provide grout removal with little or no damage to the surrounding tile.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention, which is defined by the claims set out at the end of this disclosure, is directed to a grout removal tool which addresses the previously-noted problems, and which provides advantages unavailable in prior grout removal tools. A particularly preferred version of the grout removal tool includes a proximal end adapted to be attached within a power reciprocating saw, and an opposing distal end having a cutting edge. Between the proximal attachment end and the distal cutting end, an elongated proximal leg extends from the proximal attachment end to join an elongated distal leg which descends at an angle toward the distal cutting end. The proximal leg is oriented at least substantially parallel to the cutting edge of the tool (and also the reciprocation axis along which the tool reciprocates within the saw) so that when the tool is reciprocated along a grouted work surface, at least a major portion of the cutting edge is placed in use, resulting in a higher rate of grout removal.




Within the grout removal tool, the proximal attachment end is preferably provided on an adapter, and the cutting edge is provided on one or more cutting blades which are replaceable on the distal end of the adapter. The cutting blades each affix to opposing planar sides of the adapter at two or more attachment points, and these attachment points are preferably situated along a line which is oriented at an angle to the reciprocation axis. As a result, the forces/stresses between the cutting blades and the adapter are distributed across the blade and the distal end of the adapter during reciprocation, resulting in less wear and greater durability. Additionally, the opposing planar sides of the adapter upon which the blades are affixed preferably slope inwardly towards each other so that the cutting blades installed thereon are oriented at an angle during cutting. For reasons discussed elsewhere in this document, this is believed to result in lesser wear of the cutting blade, as well as lesser grout dust dispersion. The cutting edge preferably has a nonplanar shape, preferably an arcuate one. As a result, when cutting begins, the initial contact area between the cutting edge and the grout is smaller, resulting in greater initial grout penetration.




The grout removal tool has been found to provide an extremely high rate of grout removal, one rivaling rotary-mode grout removal tools. However, unlike rotary-mode tools, the tool that is the subject of this document is extremely easy to control, and can be used for high-precision grout removal without damaging the surrounding tile. Additionally, the tool provides extremely low dust generation (on the order of that of the vibration-mode grout removal tools), but at far lower cost. Further advantages, features, and objects of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the invention in conjunction with the associated drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a side perspective view of a preferred embodiment of a grout removal tool shown installed on a reciprocating saw.





FIG. 2

is a side elevational view of the grout removal tool of

FIG. 1

shown without the reciprocating saw, and with the grout removal tool's adapter shown in solid lines and its cutting blade shown in phantom (dashed) lines.





FIG. 3

is a side elevational view of the cutting blade of the grout removal tool of

FIGS. 1 and 2

.





FIG. 4

is a front elevational view of the grout removal tool of

FIG. 2

shown with two cutting blades installed on opposing sides of the adapter.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION




Initially referring to

FIG. 1

of the drawings, the grout removal tool


10


is shown in a ready-to-use state installed within a common reciprocating saw


100


in place of the reciprocating saw's blade. Before discussing the grout removal tool


10


in greater detail, it will first be helpful to briefly discuss the structure and operation of reciprocating saws.




Reciprocating saws


100


are commonly used in carpentry and woodworking fields for cutting thin sheets of wood. The reciprocating saw


100


of

FIG. 1

is an exemplary one, and it should be understood that reciprocating saws


100


that can be used with the grout removal tool


10


may have a wide variety of configurations other than the one illustrated. However, the reciprocating saw


100


of

FIG. 1

has several features which are exemplary of most reciprocating saws: a handle


102


with a trigger


104


for actuating cutting; a blade mount


106


wherein the reciprocating saw blade (not shown) is mounted; and an elongated motor housing


108


extending between the handle


102


and the blade mount


106


. Reciprocating saws of this type are manufactured by a wide variety of manufactures, such as Black & Decker/DeWalt (Hampstead, Md.), Milwaukee/Sawzall (Brookfield, Wis.), Porter-Cable (Jackson, Tenn.), Makita (La Mirada, Calf.), Delta (Tupelo, MS), Skil/Bosch (Chicago, Ill.), and they commonly include such features as pneumatic, 120 volt, and/or battery-powered operation; variable speed control; and rapid blade replacement. As noted above, in

FIG. 1

, the blade mount


106


of the reciprocating saw


100


is illustrated as accommodating the grout removal tool


10


rather than a reciprocating saw blade. No power source for the reciprocating saw


100


is illustrated, but a common reciprocating saw


100


would generally have an electric power cable, battery, or pneumatic hose protruding from it somewhere near its handle.




When a reciprocating saw


100


is used for its ordinary and intended purpose, an elongated reciprocating saw blade having a single serrated edge has one of its ends installed within the blade mount


106


so that it extends outwardly along a reciprocation axis (labeled as


110


in FIG.


1


), which is generally situated at or adjacent to the lengthwise axis of the reciprocating saw


100


. Reciprocating saw blades come in a variety of lengths, with average lengths being approximately 8-12 inches for carpentry applications. The ends of reciprocating saw blades that are to be installed within the blade mounts


106


generally have complex key-like shapes which are specially designed to fit within complementary structures in the blade mounts


106


to firmly secure the saw blade ends therein.




After the reciprocating saw blade is installed within the blade mount


106


, the serrated edge of the blade—which may be said to define its cutting axis—rests parallel to the reciprocation axis


110


, with the teeth facing the direction indicated by the arrow


112


(downwardly towards the reciprocating saw handle


114


). The trigger of the reciprocating saw


100


is then actuated to cause the blade to reciprocate along its length. When using a reciprocating saw, the user holds the reciprocating saw


100


with his/her forearm oriented generally parallel to the reciprocation axis


110


, with its cutting axis (and reciprocation axis


110


) being oriented at an angle to the surface to be cut. Thus, the cutting action is different from jigsaws, wherein the blade reciprocates along an axis perpendicular to the workpiece; circular saws, wherein a circular blade rotates within an axis perpendicular to the workpiece; and other types of power saws.




It is noted that a reciprocating saw


100


, when used in conjunction with a reciprocating saw blade, would generally be unsuitable for grout removal. The size, configuration, and speed of the saw blade would result in poor control of the saw (and tile damage), and significant dust dispersion would result from the rapid reciprocating action of the blade. Further, unless reciprocating saw blades of variable width were provided, the reciprocating saw


100


could not easily cope with grout joints having widths different from the saw blade: if the grout joint is narrower than the blade, the sides of the tile will be cut and damaged; and if the grout joint is wider than the blade, once the initial cut is made down the length of the grout joint, it would be difficult to direct the blade back through the joint to remove any grout remaining along the sides of the cut groove. Additionally, since a reciprocating saw blade reciprocates along a line situated at an angle to the surface being cut, it would be very difficult to cut within a grout joint because there is generally no exposed edge of the joint at which to begin cutting, and additionally the grout joint “workpiece” does not have an exposed back side—i.e., the user would effectively be cutting in a shallow hole with the blade bottoming out during every forward stroke. This would lead to high vibration, low control, and rapid blade wear.




Referring then to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the grout removal tool


10


includes an adapter


12


(best seen in

FIG. 2

) and a cutting blade


14


(shown in phantom in FIG.


2


and by itself in FIG.


3


). Looking particularly to

FIG. 2

, the adapter


12


includes a proximal end


16


which is adapted for installation within the blade mount


106


of a reciprocating saw


100


; an elongated proximal leg


18


extending from the proximal end


16


in a direction oriented along (or at least substantially parallel to) the reciprocation axis


110


of the reciprocating saw


100


; an elongated distal leg


20


extending at an angle from the proximal leg


18


; and the distal leg


20


terminating in a distal end


22


whereupon the cutting blade


14


(or blades


14


) is mounted. The adapter


12


is formed of steel plate approximately 0.1 inch thick, with the cutting blade(s)


14


then being formed of steel plate approximately 0.02-0.05 inches thick, though other materials and dimensions are possible.




It is noted that the grout removal tool


10


is preferably configured for installation within the reciprocating saw


100


in the fashion shown in

FIG. 1

, with the cutting blade


14


facing upwardly—in effect, installed upside-down in the reciprocating saw


100


. As will be apparent from later discussion, with proper configuration of the distal leg


20


, this allows the edge of the cutting blade


14


to rest above the top plane of the reciprocating saw


100


. When the reciprocating saw


100


is held upside-down by the user, the cutting blade


14


may be reciprocated along the grout joint with its reciprocation axis


110


at least substantially parallel to the grout joint. This avoids the “stabbing” action and difficulties that the cutting blade


14


would encounter if it was instead operated with the reciprocation axis


110


at a significant angle with respect to the workpiece/grout joint. It is noted that in embodiments of the invention other than the one shown in the Figures, the distal leg


20


of the adapter


12


might be made longer so that the grout removal tool


10


need not be installed in an upside-down orientation in the reciprocating saw


100


; however, a shorter distal leg


20


is preferred for higher control. Of course, if the handle


114


of the reciprocating saw


100


is sufficiently short that it does not cause interference with the operation of the grout removal tool


10


with the reciprocation axis


110


parallel to the surface of the grout joint, the arrangement of

FIG. 1

could simply be used with the grout removal tool


10


being inverted from the arrangement shown in FIG.


1


. Note, however, that since the arrangement of

FIG. 1

will be more common (i.e., the reciprocating saw


100


will generally be used in an inverted condition to prevent interference from its handle


114


), the remainder of this document will generally refer to the direction


112


as being the upward direction, and the opposite direction being the downward direction.




The proximal end


16


of the adapter


12


is configured in the manner of standard reciprocating saw blades so that it may be firmly secured within the blade mount


106


of the reciprocating saw


100


. The proximal end


16


may include some or all of the following features, all of which are used to effect better attachment within the blade mount


106


: (1) A necked region


24


wherein the width of the proximal end


16


is reduced, so that the necked region


24


may be complementarily received within a channel in the blade mount


106


; (2) a protruding finger


26


extending from the proximal end


16


, which bears against one or more surfaces in the blade mount


106


to resist rotation of the adapter


12


within its plane; and (3) an attachment hole


28


, into which an attachment screw or another fastener may be inserted to firmly affix the adapter


12


within the blade mount


106


. It should be understood that saw blade attachment schemes within blade mounts


106


may vary, and the attachment schemes used on adapter proximal ends


16


may vary as required to allow them to be affixed within the blade mounts


106


in question.




The proximal leg


18


is then formed as an elongated bar which extends from the proximal end


16


in such a manner that once the proximal end


16


is attached within the blade mount


106


of a reciprocating saw


100


, the proximal leg


18


extends outwardly along the reciprocation axis


110


of the reciprocating saw


100


. The proximal leg


18


preferably has a length of at least 2.5 inches between the proximal end


16


and the distal leg


20


(as measured between the proximal end


16


and a midpoint set between upper and lower corners


30


and


32


), so that it may comfortably accommodate larger reciprocating saw


100


stroke lengths (e.g., 0.5 inches or more) without having the distal leg


20


interfere with the blade mount


106


. If the proximal leg


18


is provided with greater length, this can enhance the visibility of the grouted surface upon which the grout removal tool


10


is working; however, it can also result in lesser control.




The distal leg


20


is also formed as an elongated bar, and it extends at a downward angle from the proximal leg


18


(i.e., from the reciprocation axis


110


) to descend to the distal end


22


and cutting blade


14


. The distal leg


20


preferably has a length of at least 1.5 inches so that when the adapter


12


is installed within most common reciprocating saws


100


with the proximal leg


18


(and reciprocation axis


110


) resting at least substantially parallel to the surface/joint, the distal end


22


(and the cutting axis


34


of the cutting blade


14


) may be comfortably situated below the reciprocation axis


110


on the surface/grout joint to be cut. As illustrated by the arrangement shown in

FIG. 1

, the length of the distal end


22


should be sufficient that the cutting blade


14


easily reaches the grouted work surface when the reciprocation axis


110


is oriented at or close to parallel to the work surface (i.e., the user should preferably not have to tip the reciprocating saw


100


with respect to the grouted work surface in order to reach it). As a result, the blade's cutting edge


36


, which is at or approximated by the cutting axis


34


, is driven back and forth along (i.e., at least substantially parallel to) the grout joint rather than “into” it (which would cause the reciprocating saw


100


to work much harder, and which would generate more dust). The distal leg


20


preferably descends from the proximal leg


18


at an angle of 45 degrees or less (measured from the reciprocation axis


110


), rather than simply rapidly descending downward in a perpendicular fashion. A more acute orientation of the distal leg


20


with respect to the proximal leg


18


(i.e., a lower angle in relation to the reciprocation axis


110


) results in gentler cutting and greater control of the cutting blade


14


.




As should be particularly apparent from

FIG. 2

, the cutting blade


14


is removably affixed to the distal end


22


of the adapter


12


at two attachment points: a pair of blade fastener apertures


38


on the cutting blade


14


are complementarily oriented with respect to a pair of adapter apertures


40


on the adapter


12


to allow the insertion of fasteners (not shown) to affix the cutting blade


14


and adapter


12


together. It is noted that the blade apertures


38


and adapter apertures


40


(or other attachment points, if a different attachment scheme is used) are preferably situated along a line which is not parallel to the reciprocation axis


110


, as exemplified by the adapter apertures


40


illustrated in

FIG. 2

, which are oriented on a line at a slight angle to the reciprocation axis


110


. This orientation is believed to increase the lifespan of the adapter


12


and cutting blade


14


since the fasteners extending through the apertures


38


and


40


will naturally exert force (and generate stress) along planes parallel to the surface being cut (and thus at least substantially parallel to the reciprocation axis


110


). Therefore, by situating the apertures at different depths on the cutting blade


14


so that they are not both oriented along the same line parallel to the reciprocation axis


110


, forces generated by the fasteners during cutting are not all exerted along the same plane, and wear is believed to be reduced. More than two attachment points could be used (e.g., three apertures


38


/


40


and fasteners could be used for attachment of the cutting blade


14


to the distal end


22


of the adapter


12


), but it is then preferred that at least two of these attachment points be oriented in the foregoing manner (along a line which is oriented at an angle to the reciprocation axis


110


).




The cutting blade


14


, which is best seen in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, includes the cutting edge


36


, an opposing top edge


42


, a front edge


44


, and a rear edge


46


. Preferably, the front edge


44


is situated at an angle of less than


90


degrees with respect to the cutting edge


36


so that the intersection of the front edge


44


and cutting edge


36


is a well-defined nose


48


, since this is believed to enhance penetration and cutting of grout when the front edge


44


of the cutting blade


14


is driven through the grout. However, it is also preferable that the nose


48


between the front edge and cutting edge


36


be rounded, as illustrated in

FIG. 1

, since an overly-sharp vertex between the front edge


44


and cutting edge


36


could result in such deep penetration of the grout that the cutting blade


14


may have difficulty withdrawing.




The cutting edge


36


is preferably made abrasive by known methods such as by adhering diamond chips/dust, by applying granules of harder metal by sputtering, sintering, or other methods known to the art, or by roughening the surface of the cutting blade


14


around the cutting edge


36


. The cutting edge


36


is bounded in the frontward-to-rearward direction by a edge forward end


50


and an edge rear end


52


(through which the cutting axis


34


extends), and is preferably oriented at least substantially parallel to the length of the proximal leg


18


(i.e., to the reciprocation axis


110


), but with a slight degree of curvature so that it has an arcuate shape (as illustrated in FIGS.


2


and


3


). By orienting the cutting edge


36


at least substantially parallel to the reciprocation axis


110


, at least a major portion of the cutting edge


36


is exposed to the grout during each stroke of the reciprocating saw


100


, thereby speeding the cutting effort. Other cutting blade


14


configurations are possible, e.g., a cutting blade


14


having more extreme curvature (e.g., a semicircular cutting edge


36


); however, in this case a lesser portion of the cutting blade


14


is in contact with the grout at any given time and less grout is removed.




To adapt the grout removal tool


10


to grout joints having different widths, it is contemplated that the adapter


12


may have either one or several cutting blades


14


attached at its distal end


22


. When a single cutting blade


14


is used, it can be affixed to either one of the opposing planar sides


54


of the distal end


22


. When the width of the cut in the grout joint is to be increased, additional blades can be affixed on one or both of the planar sides


54


of the distal end


22


(with

FIG. 4

illustrating two cutting blades


14


affixed to the opposite sides


54


of the adapter


12


). When multiple blades


14


are added to the distal end


22


, they collectively establish the cutting edge


36


and combine to remove grout over a wider region.




Referring particularly to

FIG. 4

, it is noted that the distal end


22


of the adapter


12


has a wedge-like shape wherein the opposing planar sides


54


of the distal end


22


slope inwardly as they progress towards the cutting edge


36


. As a result, when multiple blades


14


are situated on opposing sides of the adapter


12


—as illustrated in FIG.


4


—they point inwardly so that their cutting edges


36


fit closely adjacent each other, or in abutment with each other. As a result, very little or no space exists between the cutting edges


36


of multiple blades


14


when they are situated on opposing sides of the distal end


22


of the adapter


12


. This lack of effective space between the cutting edges


36


is believed to significantly contribute to dust reduction, since it retains a greater majority of the grout dust within the cut groove in the grout joint rather than lifting the dust outwardly to be dispersed in the air. The wedge-shaped configuration for the distal end


22


is also believed to result in longer life for the cutting blades


14


. By affixing the cutting blade


14


on one side of the adapter


12


and using it until it begins to go dull, and then switching the cutting blade


14


to the other side of the adapter


12


, the life of the cutting blade


14


may be extended since the diamond chips (or other abrasive) present on the planar sides


54


adjacent the cutting edge


36


are more fully utilized.




It is noted that most power reciprocating saws


100


have a stroke length between 0.75 inches-1.25 inches (or in some cases more), or can have their stroke length adapted to this range. This is a substantially greater range of motion than the amplitude of the vibrating-mode grout removal tools, and grout removal using the grout removal tool


10


is much faster than with vibrating-mode tools. It might be expected that the significantly greater rate of grout removal would also result in significantly greater dust generation; however, it has been found that this is not the case.




It is further noted that the grout removal tool


10


may also be used in a jigsaw or similar type of reciprocating-action tool. In a jigsaw, the cutting axis of its saw blade is oriented perpendicular to the workpiece; naturally, the grout removal tool


10


cannot be operated in this orientation when configured as shown in FIG.


1


. Therefore, the jigsaw would need to be rotated and held in an operating position wherein the cutting axis of the grout removal tool


10


is oriented at least substantially parallel to the grout joint. This is not as convenient or comfortable as the use of a reciprocating saw


100


, and thus the use of a reciprocating saw (and the arrangement of

FIG. 1

) is greatly preferred.




It is understood that the foregoing description merely describes a single particularly preferred version of the invention to illustrate various advantageous features that may be included in the invention. The invention is not intended to be limited to the preferred version described above, but rather is intended to be limited only by the claims set out below. Thus, the invention encompasses all alternate embodiments that fall literally or equivalently within the scope of these claims.



Claims
  • 1. A grout removal tool comprising:a. a proximal end adapted for securement within a power reciprocating saw; b. a distal end having two or more blades thereon, each blade having opposing faces, wherein the faces of the blades are adjacently situated in at least substantially parallel and fixed relation so the blades together define a cutting edge; c. an elongated proximal leg extending from the proximal end, the proximal leg being oriented at least substantially parallel to the cutting edge; and d. an elongated distal leg extending between the proximal leg and the distal end, the length of the distal leg being oriented at an angle to the length of the proximal leg.
  • 2. The grout removal tool of claim 1 wherein the proximal end includes at least one of:a. a necked region, b. a protruding finger, and c. an attachment hole, whereby the proximal end may be firmly secured within the power reciprocating saw.
  • 3. The grout removal tool of claim 1 wherein each blade is removably affixed to the distal end at two or more attachment points, and wherein at least one pair of each blade's attachment points is situated along a line which is oriented at an angle to the cutting edge.
  • 4. The grout removal tool of claim 1 wherein the distal end is defined by a substantially flat member having opposing substantially planar sides wherebetween the cutting edge is located, and wherein the sides slope inwardly towards the cutting edge.
  • 5. The grout removal tool of claim 1 in combination with a power reciprocating saw or jigsaw.
  • 6. The grout removal tool of claim 1 wherein the blades are removably affixed to the distal end.
  • 7. A grout removal tool comprising:a. an adapter having a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end being adapted for securement within a reciprocating saw; b. a blade removably affixed to the distal end of the adapter, the blade having a cutting edge defined thereon; the cutting edge extending between a forward end and a rear end, with an axis defined between the forward and rear ends constituting a cutting axis, and wherein the blade is removably affixed to the distal end of the adapter at two attachment points, the attachment points being situated along a line situated at an angle to the cutting axis; and c. one or more supplemental blades removably affixed to the distal end of the adapter, with all blades being adjacently arrayed in at least substantially parallel and fixed alignment.
  • 8. The grout removal tool of claim 7 in combination with a power reciprocating saw or jigsaw.
  • 9. A grout removal tool comprising:a. an adapter including: (1) a proximal end; (2) a proximal leg extending forwardly from the proximal end along an at least substantially linear path; (3) a distal leg extending forwardly from the proximal leg, wherein at least a substantial portion of the distal leg descends at an angle from the path of the proximal leg; (4) a distal end situated forward of the distal leg and opposite the proximal end, the distal end having opposing sloped sides which converge inwardly towards each other in a descending direction; b. a blade removably affixed to one of the sloped sides of the distal end, the blade having a lower cutting edge defined thereon; and wherein the distal end does not form a part of the cutting edge.
  • 10. The grout removal tool of claim 9 wherein the blade is removably affixed to one of the sides of the distal end of the adapter by two or more attachment points, and wherein at least two of the attachment points are situated along a line which is not parallel to the cutting edge.
  • 11. The grout removal tool of claim 9 wherein a length of the proximal leg adjacent the proximal end has generally uniform shape save for one or more discontinuities being defined therein, the discontinuities being defined by at least one of:a. a necked region, b. a protruding finger, and c. an attachment hole, whereby the proximal end is adapted for attachment in a power reciprocating action tool via grasping of the discontinuities.
  • 12. The grout removal tool of claim 9 wherein the cutting edge is arcuate.
  • 13. The grout removal tool of claim 9 wherein the blade is defined by:a. a top edge opposite the cutting edge; b. a front edge situated between the top edge and the cutting edge, and opposite the distal end of the adapter; and c. a rear edge situated opposite the front edge, wherein the front edge is situated at an angle of less than 90 degrees with respect to the cutting edge.
  • 14. The grout removal tool of claim 9 in combination with a power reciprocating saw or jigsaw.
  • 15. The grout removal tool of claim 9 wherein the blade is affixed to one of the sides of the distal end with a supplemental blade affixed to the opposite side of the distal end, so that the blade and supplemental blade rest in at least substantially parallel adjacent relation.
  • 16. The grout removal tool of claim 9 wherein the distal end of the adapter has opposing substantially planar sides below which the cutting edge is located.
  • 17. A grout removal tool comprising:a. an adapter having a proximal end and a distal end which is at least substantially flat, the proximal end being adapted for securement within a reciprocating saw, and the distal end having opposing sloped sides each converging slopes inwardly toward the other; b. a blade removably affixed to one of the opposing sloped sides of the distal end of the adapter, the blade having a cutting edge defined thereon; and wherein the distal end does not form a part of the cutting edge.
  • 18. The grout removal tool of claim 17 comprising two or more blades, each being removably affixed at one of the opposing sides of the distal end of the adapter, wherein the cutting edges of the blades are adjacently aligned in at least substantially parallel relation.
  • 19. The grout removal tool of claim 18 wherein each blade is removably affixed to the distal end at two or more attachment points, and wherein at least one pair of each blade's attachment points is situated along a line which is oriented at an angle to the cutting edge.
  • 20. The grout removal tool of claim 17 wherein the blade is removably affixed to the distal end at two or more attachment points, and wherein at least one pair of the blade's attachment points is situated along a line which is oriented at an angle to the cutting edge.
  • 21. The grout removal tool of claim 20 comprising two or more blades, each being removably affixed at one of the opposing sides of the distal end of the adapter, wherein the cutting edges of the blades are adjacently aligned in at least substantially parallel relation.
  • 22. The grout removal tool of claim 17 wherein the cutting edge is arcuate.
  • 23. The grout removal tool of claim 17 in combination with a power reciprocating saw or jigsaw.
  • 24. The grout removal tool of claim 17 wherein the adapter is defined by an at least substantially flat member.
  • 25. A grout removal tool comprising:a. an adapter having a proximal end and a distal end, the proximal end being adapted for securement within a reciprocating saw, and the adapter extending forwardly and downwardly from the proximal end to the distal end, the distal end having opposing sides; b. two or more blades, each having a cutting edge defined thereon and being removably affixed to one of the opposing sides of the distal end of the adapter, the cutting edges of the blades being adjacently and fixedly aligned in a parallel row; and wherein the cutting edges together define a grout removal cutting edge.
  • 26. The grout removal tool of claim 25 wherein at least one of the sides of the distal end slopes inwardly toward the other.
  • 27. The grout removal tool of claim 26 wherein each blade is removably affixed to the distal end at two or more attachment points, and wherein at least one pair of each blade's attachment points is situated along a line which is oriented at an angle to the cutting edge.
  • 28. The grout removal tool of claim 25 wherein each blade is removably affixed to the distal end at two or more attachment points, and wherein at least one pair of each blade's attachment points is situated along a line which is oriented at an angle to the cutting edge.
  • 29. The grout removal tool of claim 28 wherein at least one of the sides of the distal end slopes inwardly toward the other.
  • 30. The grout removal tool of claim 25 wherein the cutting edge is arcuate.
  • 31. The grout removal tool of claim 25 in combination with a power reciprocating saw or jigsaw.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 USC §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/143,212 filed Jul. 9, 1999, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
632287 Swacick Sep 1899 A
833528 Jones Oct 1906 A
2830368 Knoll et al. Apr 1958 A
3251129 Knoll May 1966 A
3307242 Cofran Mar 1967 A
3553905 Lemelson Jan 1971 A
3646675 Wezel Mar 1972 A
3888004 Coleman Jun 1975 A
3892039 Fisher Jul 1975 A
4128970 Sawrenko Dec 1978 A
4756085 Lebessis Jul 1988 A
4953301 Dobbs, Jr. Sep 1990 A
5505189 Chiuminatta et al. Apr 1996 A
5809657 Mortensen Sep 1998 A
5885144 Martin et al. Mar 1999 A
6149510 Romagnoli Nov 2000 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Tile-Vac Dustless Joint Removal System, Dustless Tile Vac.System, (Date Unknown).
Dustless Grout Remover flyer, Tile EZ USA Inc., (Date Unknown).
Dustless Grout Remover, Tile EZ USA Inc., (http://www.tile-eze.com/fein.html, Jun. 29, 1999).
Grout Removal Attachment Kit web page, Dremel, (http://www.dremel.com/whatsnew/whatsnew.html, Dec. 10, 1999).
“A Must Have Grout Master Dustless Grout Remover!”, Midwest Trade Tool, Inc., (Date Unknown).
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/143212 Jul 1999 US