Data compression, either lossless or lossy, is desirable in many applications in which data is to be stored in, and/or read from, a memory. By compressing data before storage of the data in a memory, the amount of data transferred to the memory may be reduced. An example of data for which data compression is particularly useful is image data, such as depth data to be stored in a depth buffer, pixel data to be stored in a frame buffer and texture data to be stored in a texture buffer. These buffers may be any suitable type of memory, such as cache memory, separate memory subsystems, memory areas in a shared memory system or some combination thereof.
A Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) may be used to process image data in order to determine pixel values of an image to be stored in a frame buffer for output to a display. GPUs usually have highly parallelised structures for processing large blocks of data in parallel. There is significant commercial pressure to make GPUs (especially those intended to be implemented on mobile devices) operate at lower power levels. Competing against this is the desire to use higher quality rendering algorithms on faster GPUs, which thereby puts pressure on a relatively limited resource: memory bandwidth. However, increasing the bandwidth of the memory subsystem might not be an attractive solution because moving data to and from, and even within, the GPU consumes a significant portion of the power budget of the GPU. The same issues may be relevant for other processing units, such as central processing units (CPUs), as well as GPUs.
The embodiments described below are provided by way of example only and are not limiting of implementations which solve any or all of the disadvantages of known methods of data compression.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A method of data compression is described in which the total size of the compressed data is determined and based on that determination, the bit depth of the input data may be reduced before the data is compressed. The bit depth that is used may be determined by comparing the calculated total size to one or more pre-defined threshold values to generate a mapping parameter. The mapping parameter is then input to a remapping element that is arranged to perform the conversion of the input data and then output the converted data to a data compression element. The value of the mapping parameter may be encoded into the compressed data so that it can be extracted and used when subsequently decompressing the data.
A first aspect provides a method of compressing a data block comprising data from four channels, the method comprising, for each channel or each sub-set of channels: determining a total size of the compressed data using at least partial data compression technique; determining a mapping parameter by comparing the total size to a plurality of thresholds; reducing a bit depth of each data value based on the mapping parameter; compressing the reduced bit depth data using the full data compression technique; and encoding the mapping parameter in the compressed reduced bit depth data.
A second aspect provides a data compression unit arranged to compress a data block comprising data from four channels, the data compression unit comprising, for each channel or each sub-set of channels: a bit predictor element arranged to determine a total size of the compressed data using at least partial data compression technique and determine a mapping parameter by comparing the total size to a plurality of thresholds; a first remapping element arranged to reduce a bit depth of each data value based on the mapping parameter; a data compression element arranged to compress the reduced bit depth data using the full data compression technique; and a bit depth encoding element arranged to encode the mapping parameter in the compressed reduced bit depth data.
The data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein may be embodied in hardware on an integrated circuit. There may be provided a method of manufacturing, at an integrated circuit manufacturing system, a data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein. There may be provided an integrated circuit definition dataset that, when processed in an integrated circuit manufacturing system, configures the system to manufacture a data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein. There may be provided a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer readable description of an integrated circuit that, when processed, causes a layout processing system to generate a circuit layout description used in an integrated circuit manufacturing system to manufacture a data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein.
There may be provided an integrated circuit manufacturing system comprising: a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer readable integrated circuit description that describes the data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein; a layout processing system configured to process the integrated circuit description so as to generate a circuit layout description of an integrated circuit embodying the data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein; and an integrated circuit generation system configured to manufacture the data compression and/or decompression unit as described herein according to the circuit layout description.
There may be provided computer program code for performing any of the methods described herein. There may be provided non-transitory computer readable storage medium having stored thereon computer readable instructions that, when executed at a computer system, cause the computer system to perform any of the methods described herein.
The above features may be combined as appropriate, as would be apparent to a skilled person, and may be combined with any of the aspects of the examples described herein.
Examples will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The accompanying drawings illustrate various examples. The skilled person will appreciate that the illustrated element boundaries (e.g., boxes, groups of boxes, or other shapes) in the drawings represent one example of the boundaries. It may be that in some examples, one element may be designed as multiple elements or that multiple elements may be designed as one element. Common reference numerals are used throughout the figures, where appropriate, to indicate similar features.
The following description is presented by way of example to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The present invention is not limited to the embodiments described herein and various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Embodiments will now be described by way of example only.
As described above, memory bandwidth is a relatively limited resource within a processing unit (e.g. a CPU or GPU), similarly, memory space is a limited resource because increasing it has implications in terms of both physical size of a device and power consumption. Through the use of data compression before storage of data in a memory, both the memory bandwidth and the space in memory are reduced.
Many data compression schemes exist, some of which are lossless and others that are lossy. Lossless compression techniques may be preferred in some situations because the original data can be perfectly reconstructed from the compressed data. In contrast, where lossy compression techniques are used, data cannot be perfectly reconstructed from the compressed data and instead the decompressed data is only an approximation of the original data. The accuracy of the decompressed (and hence reconstructed) data will depend upon the significance of the data that is discarded during the compression process. Additionally, repeatedly compressing and decompressing data using lossy compression techniques results in a progressive reduction in quality, unlike where lossless compression techniques are used. Lossless compression techniques are often used for audio and image data and examples of general purpose lossless compression techniques include run-length encoding (RLE) and Huffman coding.
The amount of compression that can be achieved using lossless compression techniques (e.g. as described in UK patent number 2530312) depends on the nature of the data that is being compressed, with some data being more easily compressed than other data. The amount of compression that is achieved by a compression technique (whether lossless or lossy) may be expressed in terms of a percentage that is referred to herein as the compression ratio and is given by:
It will be appreciated that there are other ways to define the compression ratio; however, the above convention is used throughout. This means that a compression ratio of 100% indicates that no compression has been achieved, a compression ratio of 50% indicates that the data has been compressed to half of its original, uncompressed size and a compression ratio of 25% indicates that the data has been compressed to a quarter of its original, uncompressed size. Lossy compression techniques can typically compress data to a greater extent (i.e. achieve smaller compression ratios) than lossless compression techniques. Therefore, in some examples, e.g. where the extent of achievable compression is considered more important than the quality of the decompressed (i.e. reconstructed) data, lossy compression techniques may be preferred over lossless compression techniques. The choice between a lossless and a lossy compression technique is an implementation choice.
The variability in the amount of compression that can be achieved (which is dependent upon characteristics of the actual data that is being compressed) has an impact on both memory bandwidth and memory space and may mean that the full benefit of the compression achieved is not realised in relation to one or both of these two aspects, as described below.
In many use cases, random access of the original data is required. Typically for image data, to achieve this, the image data is divided into independent, non-overlapping, rectangular blocks prior to compression. If the size of each compressed block varies because of the nature of the data in the block (e.g. a block which is all the same colour may be compressed much more than a block which contains a lot of detail) such that in some cases a block may not be compressed at all, then in order to maintain the ability to randomly access the compressed data blocks, the memory space may be allocated as if the data was not compressed at all. Alternatively, it is necessary to maintain an index, with an entry per block that identifies where the compressed data for that block resides in memory. This requires memory space to store the index (which is potentially relatively large) and the memory accesses (to perform the look-up in the index) adds latency to the system. For example, in systems where it is important to be able to randomly access each compressed block of data and where an index is not used, even if an average compression ratio (across all data blocks) of 50% is achieved, memory space still has to be allocated assuming a 100% compression ratio, because for some blocks it may not be possible to achieve any compression using lossless compression techniques.
Furthermore, as the transfer of data to memory occurs in fixed size bursts (e.g. in bursts of 64 bytes), for any given block there are only a discrete set of effective compression ratios for the data transfer to memory. For example, if a block of data comprises 256 bytes and the transfer of data occurs in 64 byte bursts, the effective compression ratios for the data transfer are 25% (if the block is compressed from 256 bytes to no more than 64 bytes and hence requires only a single burst), 50% (if the block is compressed into 65-128 bytes and hence requires two bursts), 75% (if the block is compressed into 129-192 bytes and hence requires three bursts) and 100% (if the block is not compressed at all or is compressed into 193 or more bytes and hence requires four bursts). This means that if a block of data comprising 256 bytes is compressed into anywhere in the range of 129-192 bytes, then three bursts are required for the compressed block, compared to four for the uncompressed block, making the effective compression ratio for the memory transfer 75% whilst the actual data compression achieved could be much lower (e.g. as low as 50.4% if compressed into 129 bytes). Similarly, if the compression can only compress the block into 193 bytes, the memory transfer sees no benefit from the use of data compression, as four bursts are still required to transfer the compressed data block to memory. In other examples, blocks of data may comprise a different number of bytes, and bursts to memory may comprise a different number of bytes.
Described herein are various methods of performing data compression. Some of the methods described herein provide a guarantee that a compression threshold, which may be defined in terms of a compression ratio (e.g. 50%), compressed block size (e.g. 128 bytes) or in any other way, is met. An effect of this guarantee is that a reduced amount of memory space can be allocated whilst still enabling random access to blocks of compressed data and there is also a guaranteed reduction in the memory bandwidth that is used to transfer the compressed data to and from memory. In other examples the compression ratio may be targeted (i.e. the method may be configured to achieve the ratio in the majority of cases) but there is no guarantee that it will be met.
Also described herein are methods for converting 10-bit (e.g. 10:10:10:2) data to 8-bit (e.g. 8:8:8:3) data and methods for mapping from an n-bit number to an m-bit number. As described below, the methods for converting 10-bit (e.g. 10:10:10:2) data to 8-bit (e.g. 8:8:8:3 or 8888) data may be used as a pre-processing (or pre-encoding) step for the methods of performing data compression described herein or may be used independently (e.g. with another data compression method or with only a lossless compression method, such as that described below with reference to
The GPU 104 comprises a rendering unit 110, a compression/decompression unit 112, a memory interface 114 and a display interface 116. The system 100 is arranged such that data can pass, in either direction, between: (i) the CPU 102 and the rendering unit 110; (ii) the CPU 102 and the memory interface 114; (iii) the rendering unit 110 and the memory interface 114; (iv) the memory interface 114 and the memory 106; (v) the rendering unit 110 and the compression/decompression unit 112; (vi) the compression/decompression unit 112 and the memory interface 114; and (vii) the memory interface 114 and the display interface. The system 100 is further arranged such that data can pass from the compression/decompression unit 112 to the display interface 116. Images, which are rendered by the GPU 104, may be sent from the display interface 116 to a display for display thereon.
In operation, the GPU 104 processes image data. For example, the rendering unit 110 may perform scan conversion of graphics primitives, such as triangles and lines, using known techniques such as depth-testing (e.g. for hidden surface removal) and texturing and/or shading. The rendering unit 110 may contain cache units to reduce memory traffic. Some data is read or written by the rendering unit 110, to the memory 106 via the memory interface unit 114 (which may include a cache) but for other data, such as data to be stored in a frame buffer, the data preferably goes from the rendering unit 110 to the memory interface 114 via the compression/decompression unit 112. The compression/decompression unit 112 reduces the amount of data that is to be transferred across the external memory bus to the memory 106 by compressing the data, as described in more detail below.
The display interface 116 sends completed image data to the display. An uncompressed image may be accessed directly from the memory interface unit 114. Compressed data may be accessed via the compression/decompression unit 112 and sent as uncompressed data to the display 108. In alternative examples the compressed data could be sent directly to the display 108 and the display 108 could include logic for decompressing the compressed data in an equivalent manner to the decompression of the compression/decompression unit 112. Although shown as a single entity, the compression/decompression unit 112 may contain multiple parallel compression and/or decompression units for enhanced performance reasons.
In various examples, the compression/decompression unit 112 may implement a compression method (or scheme) that guarantees that a compression threshold (which may be pre-defined and hence fixed or may be an input variable) is met. As detailed above, the compression threshold may, for example, be defined in terms of a compression ratio (e.g. 50% or 25%), compressed block size (e.g. 128 bytes) or in any other way. In order to provide this guarantee in relation to the amount of compression that is provided, and given that the exact nature of the data is not known in advance, a combination of lossless and lossy compression methods are used and three example architectures are shown in
In the method shown in
In the method shown in
In the method shown in
In the method shown in
In certain situations, it may be possible to compress a data block by more than the compression threshold. In such instances, the primary compression unit 202 may output a compressed data block that always exactly satisfies the compression threshold or alternatively, the size of the output compressed data block may, in such situations, be smaller than that required to satisfy the compression threshold. Similarly, the lossy compression technique that is used in
Depending upon the particular implementation, any of the architectures of
The methods described above with reference to
To identify which compression technique was used (e.g. lossless or lossy), data may be appended that indicates the type of compression used (e.g. in a header) or this may be incorporated into any existing header (or header table) that is used or each compressed block of data may include a number of bits, in addition to the compressed data, that indicates the type of compression used (e.g. as described below with reference to
In any of the architectures of
The use of different data formats and/or pre-processing steps in the architectures of
A lossy compression technique which guarantees that a pre-defined compression threshold is met is described with reference to
The lossy compression method shown in
The source data that is input to the method of
An example implementation of the analysis stage (block 304) in
A first decision operation (block 504) assesses the range of alpha values across the sub-block and determines whether the range is greater than the errors that would be introduced by the use of the (best case) variable alpha mode (in block 308). The size of these errors is denoted alphadifftol in
In response to determining that the range is greater than the errors that would be introduced by the use of the (best case) variable alpha mode (Yes' in block 504), a variable alpha mode of compression (block 308) is applied to this sub-block. However, in response to determining that the range is not greater than the errors that would be introduced by the use of the (best case) variable alpha mode (No′ in block 504), a constant alpha mode of compression (block 306) is applied to this sub-block and two further decision operations (blocks 506, 508) are used to determine the value of alpha which is used for the entire sub-block. If the value of maxalpha is the maximum possible value for alpha (e.g. 0xFF, Yes' in block 506), then the value of alpha used in the constant alpha mode (constalphaval) is set to that maximum possible value (block 510). This ensures that if there are any fully opaque pixels, they stay fully opaque after the data has been compressed and subsequently decompressed. If the value of minalpha is zero (e.g. 0x00, Yes' in block 508), then the value of alpha used in the constant alpha mode (constalphaval) is set to zero (block 512). This ensures that if there are any fully transparent pixels, they stay fully transparent after the data has been compressed and subsequently decompressed. If neither of these conditions are held (No′ in both blocks 506 and 508), then an average value of alpha is calculated across the pixels in the sub-block (block 514) and used in the constant alpha mode.
The following pseudo-code (or its functional equivalent) may, for example, be used to implement the analysis shown in
An alternative example implementation of the analysis stage (block 304 in
In comparison to the method of
Where the analysis of the alpha values within a sub-block (in block 304, e.g. as shown in
Two different ways of packing the compressed values into a data block are shown in
In the second example, as shown in
In examples where the constalphaval is an 8-bit value (e.g. where the constant alpha is not <5 or >250), the method of
Where the analysis of the alpha values within a sub-block (in block 304, e.g. as shown in
|Red difference|+|Green difference|+|Blue difference|+|Alpha difference| (1)
Having identified the most similar neighbouring pixel for each pixel in the first subset, an index is selected for each pixel in the first subset using a look-up table, such as:
Where the references for the neighbouring pixels R0-R4 are defined as shown in
In various examples, there may be additional indices that are used where there is a gradient around a pixel in the first subset. In such examples, the pixel data for one or more additional notional neighbour pixels are calculated, for example by the addition of a single additional notional neighbour pixel, R5, where the pixel data for R5 is calculated using:
R5=(R0+R1)/2
In other examples, one or more further notional neighbour pixels may also be considered, e.g. R6 and/or R7, where the pixel data for R6 and R7 is calculated using:
R6=(R0+R4)/2
R7=(R1+R3)/2
Where additional notional neighbour pixels are used, the look-up table includes corresponding additional entries to identify the indices, for example:
In various examples, there may be an additional special case index that indicates that none of the neighbouring pixels (including any notional neighbouring pixels, where used) are sufficiently similar to the particular pixel. This may, for example, be determined based on a threshold and where the closest colour difference exceeds this threshold, an index of 000 may be used. In an example, the threshold may be 31 for 5-bit values. In addition to using the index 000, the pixel referred to by the index 000 is changed to a value that is an average between the current pixel and the pixel referred to. Alternatively, in a variation of
The encoding mode is determined for each of the mini-blocks based on colour differences that are calculated for each pixel pair in the mini-block (block 904). The colour difference may be calculated using equation (1) above and this may be implemented by the functional equivalent of the pseudo-code provided below in which the colour difference is clamped to 6 bits (i.e. a maximum value of 63). In this code, the notation is as follows: IntermediateResult[5,0] refers to the 6 LSBs of the IntermediateResult 10-bit value and red/grn/blu/alp refer to red/green/blue/alpha respectively).
The pseudo-code above includes a sum of absolute differences (SAD) function and this may, for example, be implemented in any way (e.g. as implemented by a logic synthesis tool or as described in
Having calculated the colour differences (in block 904), the smallest colour difference for any pixel pair in the mini-block is used to determine the mini-block encoding mode that is used (block 906). There are two distinct types of mini-block encoding mode that are used dependent upon whether the smallest colour difference (between any pixel pair in the mini-block) exceeds a threshold value (which may, for example be set at a value in the range 0-50, e.g. 40). If the smallest colour difference does not exceed the threshold (‘Yes’ in block 906), then one of a plurality of encoding patterns are used (as selected in block 908) and three per-mini-block palette colours are stored (blocks 910-914). However, if the smallest colour difference does exceed the threshold (‘No’ in block 906) then a four colour mode is used (block 916). These different mini-block modes are described in detail below. The encoding patterns rely on an assumption that in the majority of mini-blocks there are no more than three distinct colours and in such cases the mini-block can be represented by three palette colours along with an assignment of pixels to palette entries. The four colour mode is present to handle the exceptions to this.
As noted above, the value of the threshold may be in the range 0-50. In various examples it may be a fixed value that is set at design time. Alternatively, it may be a variable which is stored in a global register and read each time the method of
It may be noted that the threshold used in the method of
As shown in
The following table shows an example mapping of the corresponding palette colours for each of the pixels A-D in a mini-block for each of the encoding modes along with the encoding value that is stored in the 3-bit field 670-673 for the mini-block (as shown in
A portion of example pseudo-code that implements this table (and blocks 908-910 of
The Average function in the pseudo-code above may be implemented as follows (or its functional equivalent):
Having determined the three palette colours, P0, P1, P2 in RGBA8888 format, the values are converted to RGBA5555 format (block 912, e.g. as described below with reference to FIGS. 12A-B). Whilst the operations of generating the palette colours (in block 910) and the compression by converting format (in block 912) are shown and described separately, it will be appreciated that the two operations may be combined into a single step and this may result in less complex hardware.
As shown in
Whilst the four colour mode is shown as using RGBA4434 format, alternative compressed formats may alternatively be used (e.g. RGBA4443). The RGBA4434 format may be used because although the human eye is sensitive to blue, the human visual system does not perceive the colour with the same resolution as red or green. In addition, a dither pattern may additionally be applied when using the four colour mode (e.g. in block 916 and also block 602 in
Having generated the compressed data for a mini-block, using any one of the encoding patterns or the four colour mode, the compressed data for the mini-block is packed into a 60-bit data field 660-663 for the mini-block and the corresponding encoding value is inserted in the associated field 670-673 (block 914). The way that the data is packed differs depending upon the mode used and these are shown in
As described above, for a mini-block that has been compressed using an encoding pattern, the data to include in the data field comprises three palette colours in RGBA5555 format and these may be packed into the data field as shown in
Having formed the data fields for the mini-blocks (in block 914), these are then packed into data fields to the sub-blocks (block 918, e.g. as shown in
Although the encoding patterns are described above in relation to the variable alpha mode, in various examples they may also be used to provide a higher-precision constant alpha mode where the constant alpha value is 255 (or other pre-defined value) as shown in
The encoding mode is then determined for each of the mini-blocks based on colour differences that are calculated for each pixel pair in the mini-block (block 904). The colour difference may be calculated using any of the methods described above but omitting the alpha channel data.
Having calculated the colour differences (in block 904), the smallest colour difference for any pixel pair in the mini-block is used to determine the mini-block encoding mode that is used (block 906). There are two distinct types of mini-block encoding mode that are used dependent upon whether the smallest colour difference (between any pixel pair in the mini-block) exceeds a threshold value (which may, for example be set at a value in the range 0-50, e.g. 40). If the smallest colour difference does not exceed the threshold (Yes' in block 906), then one of a plurality of encoding patterns are used (as selected in block 908) and three per-mini-block palette colours are stored (blocks 910-914). However, if the smallest colour difference does exceed the threshold (No′ in block 906) then the earlier compression approach (from
The selection of an encoding pattern then proceeds as described above with reference to
Having generated the compressed data for a mini-block, using either one of the encoding patterns or the four colour mode (although in some examples, this four colour mode may not be used where alpha is constant value of 255), the compressed data for the mini-block is packed into a 60-bit data field 660-663 for the mini-block and the corresponding encoding value is inserted in the associated field 670-673 (block 1114). As described above, in various examples where the encoding patterns are used to provide higher-precision constant alpha mode, constalphaval may also be packed into the 60-bit data fields 660-663. Having formed the data fields for the mini-blocks (in block 1114), these are then packed into data fields to the sub-blocks (block 1118, e.g. as shown in
In the description above, there are six different palette assignment (or encoding) modes, as shown in
The first of the two palette colour modes 1001 (as shown in
Where the two palette colour modes are used, an additional test against the pre-defined threshold (which may be different from the threshold used in block 906) may be inserted between blocks 904 and 906 in
As detailed above, there are many operations in data compression that involve converting an n-bit number, N, to an m-bit number, M, where n>m. The ideal mapping from n to m bits is given by:
This may, for example, be implemented using a large look-up table (LUT) comprising N entries. Alternatively, since the results are ‘symmetrical’ around a half, in that:
IdealMap(
where
As shown in
The operation of the look-up logic unit 1224 to determine the adjustment value (in block 1204) can be described with reference to a specific example where n=8 and m=5 and the following VHDL (or its functional equivalent), where “0-0-111” is an example of a pre-defined bit sequence which is compared to the bits in the input n-bit number and “01” its associated adjustment value:
In this example, ‘std_logic_vector(7 downto 0)’ refers to all 8 bits of N (labelled 0-7, with bit 0 being the LSB and bit 8 being the MSB) and the function ‘std_match’ may be implemented using AND gates, for example, ‘std_match(i, “00---11-”)’ may be implemented as follows:
In this way, the look-up logic unit 1224 compares pre-determined subsets of the bits of the input n-bit number with pre-determined values in fixed-function circuitry, and sets the adjustment value in dependence on the results of the comparisons. Implementing the conversion from an n-bit number to an m-bit number in hardware using AND/OR gates as described above to determine an adjustment value to be applied to a truncated version of the n-bit number provides a very efficient implementation (e.g. in terms of silicon area, latency and power consumption) for performing a particular conversion (e.g. 8-bit values to 5-bit values). In this example, the hardware is inflexible in the sense that it is implemented in fixed-function circuitry using AND and OR gates for performing one or more specific conversions (e.g. conversions from 8-bit numbers to 5-bit numbers). If different conversions are required, e.g. different values of n and/or m, then different hardware can be used. The trade-off for this inflexibility is that the hardware can be implemented very efficiently (in terms of silicon area, latency and power consumption). Since the compression process described herein uses an 8-bit to 5-bit converter, and this is known at design time, the inflexibility is not a big problem whereas the efficiency advantages can be significant.
Although data decompression is not described above, it will be appreciated that the data compression operations described above are reversed in order to achieve data decompression. For example, the methods of
As shown in
An adjustment value is then determined (block 1204) based on the input n-bit number, N, and, as described below, this may be implemented using a number of AND and OR gates in the look-up logic unit 1224. These AND and OR logic gates (or alternative logic arrangement that is functionally equivalent) compare a plurality of pre-determined subsets of the bits of N with pre-determined values in fixed-function circuitry and based on the outcome of the comparisons, determine an adjustment value which is then added to the replicated value (from block 1302 and replication hardware unit 1322) in the increment/decrement unit 1226 (block 1306). The value of the adjustment value is either zero, one, or minus one. In some examples, i.e. for some combinations of values of n and m (where n<m), the adjustment value is always zero and hence both the increment/decrement unit 1226 and the look-up logic unit 1224 can be omitted from
The operation of the look-up logic unit 1224 to determine the adjustment value (in block 1204) can be described with reference to a specific example where n=5 and m=8 and the following VHDL (or its functional equivalent):
In this example, ‘std_logic_vector(4 downto 0)’ refers to all 5 bits of N (labelled 0-4, with bit 0 being the LSB and bit 4 being the MSB) and the function ‘std_match’ may be implemented using AND gates, for example, ‘std_match(i, “00-11”)’ may be implemented as follows:
The look-up logic unit 1224 compares pre-determined subsets of the bits of the input n-bit number with pre-determined values in fixed-function circuitry, and sets the adjustment value in dependence on the results of the comparisons. As described above, the use of fixed-function hardware using the AND and OR gates described above allows the hardware to be implemented very efficiently in terms of silicon area, latency and power consumption. The hardware may be configured to perform conversions for a small group of different values for n and m.
Further examples below show how the adjustment value is calculated (in block 1204 and unit 1224) for other values of n and m.
For n=8 and m=4, the following example VHDL shows how the adjustment value is calculated (in block 1204 and unit 1224):
It is estimated that approximately 41 AND/OR gates are required to implement the look-up logic unit 1224 for n=8 and m=4. In contrast, for n=4 and m=8 only bit replication is required and the adjustment value is zero in all cases.
For n=8 and m=3, the following example VHDL shows how the adjustment value is calculated (in block 1204 and unit 1224):
It is estimated that approximately 31 AND/OR gates are required to implement the look-up logic unit 1224 for n=8 and m=3. In contrast, for n=3 and m=8 only bit replication is required and the adjustment value is zero in all cases.
The compression methods described above with reference to
As well as setting the flag or not, the pixel data is reduced from 10-bits to 8-bits in different ways dependent upon whether one or more of the MSBs for the RGB channels is one. If none of the three MSBs are equal to one (No′ in block 1402), then each of the 10-bit values for the RGB channels is truncated by removing both the MSB (which is known to be a zero) and the LSB (block 1410). If any of the three MSBs are equal to one (Yes' in block 1402), then there are two different ways in which the 10-bit values may be reduced to 8-bits (in block 1406). In a first example, the two LSBs may be removed from each 10-bit value and in a second example, the method as described above with reference to
Where the method of
It is estimated that approximately 25 AND/OR gates are required to implement the look-up logic unit 1224 for n=10 and m=8.
To reverse this mapping (e.g. as shown in
It is estimated that approximately 19 AND/OR gates are required to implement the look-up logic unit 1224 for n=8 and m=10.
Irrespective of the values of the three MSBs for the RGB channels for the pixel, the 2-bit alpha channel value is modified in the same way. As shown in
The method of
As noted above, where the method of
In a first variation on the lossy compression method of
The constant alpha modes (of block 306) are then implemented using the method of
The adjustment value for n=8 and m=6 may be determined (in block 1204 and look-up logic unit 1224) according to the following example VHDL (or its functional equivalent):
It is estimated that approximately 19 AND/OR gates are required to implement the look-up logic unit 1224 for n=8 and m=6.
The reverse mapping (e.g. as shown in
Furthermore, the four colour mode (in
Similar modifications in terms of data format are also made to the variable alpha mode, as described above with reference to
As a consequence of the different data formats used, the data is packed into the data fields (i.e. the 60-bit data fields 660-663 as shown in
The RGB input channels 1702-1706 each comprise 10 bits and the A (alpha) input channel 1708 comprises two bits. The RGB channels are each truncated by removing one or more LSBs (block 1602) and in the method shown, the R and B channels are truncated to 7 bits 1710, 1714 by removing three bits from each channel, 1711, 1715 and the G channel is truncated to 8 bits 1712 by removing two bits 1713. The 8-bit channel 1712 formed by truncation of the G channel forms one of four output pseudo-channels (block 1604).
The alpha channel data is optionally Gray coded (block 1606) before one bit 1716 is appended as a new MSB on the truncated R data 1710 to form another one of the four output pseudo-channels 1720 and the other bit 1718 from the (optionally Gray coded) alpha channel data is appended as a new MSB on the truncated B data 1714 to form a further one of the four output pseudo-channels 1722 (block 1608).
The fourth of the four output pseudo-channels 1730 is formed from error values. In one example, to generate the error values, the truncated RGB787 data 1710, 1712, 1714 is replicated so that each channel comprises 10 bits 1724, 1726, 1728 (block 1610). As shown in
Having generated the three error values (in block 1612), these are packed together to form the fourth pseudo-channel 1730 (block 1614). This may be formed by concatenating the three error values, or alternatively, the bits from the error values may be interleaved such that the three LSBs 1732 of the pseudo-channel 1730 comprise the LSB from each of the three error values, the two MSBs 1734 of the pseudo-channel 1730 comprise the MSB from each of the red and blue error values and the middle three bits 1736 comprise the remaining three bits, one from each of the three error values, as shown in
The following pseudo-code (or its functional equivalent) may be used to implement the method of
Whilst
The four 8-bit pseudo-channels 1720, 1712, 1722, 1730 generated using the method of
As described above, use of Gray coding of the alpha channel (block 1606) is optional. By using Gray coding (in which only a single bit changes as the value increments by one), the amount of data compression that can be achieved using a lossless compression method (such as described below with reference to
As was the case for the method of
Instead of discarding the entirety of the fourth pseudo-channel, the bit prediction technique described below with reference to
As shown in
The alpha channel data can then be extracted (block 1814) by removing the MSBs from the first and third channels and concatenating them (followed by optional Gray decoding, where this was used in the data compression), leaving 787 format data which is expanded to 10:10:10 format by bit replication (block 1816). The error values from the fourth pseudo-channel are then applied using an inverse of the function used to generate those error values (in block 1612). In the example shown in
In an example implementation, both the pre-processing methods of
The methods described above are described with reference to RGBA or RGBX data but as noted above, the methods may also be used with data other than image data, where three of the four channels (e.g. the RGB channels above) are correlated across channels in some way (e.g. colour or spatially correlated). For some types of data, such as YUV or YCbCr data (where YCbCr data is digital luma and two chroma components and YUV is its analogue counterpart, although it may also be used to mean YCbCr) which are frequently arranged in two or three planar formats (e.g. dependent upon whether the U and V data is separate or interleaved), there may be little or no correlation across channels within a data block, as the channels are often assembled by gathering disjoint, albeit adjacent, single- or dual-channel pixel blocks e.g. multiple tiles of only Y, only U or only V or only UV are packed as the channels of the block. As a consequence, whilst the compression methods described above can be used, and despite that the palette modes of the lossy compression method (e.g. as described above with reference to blocks 908-912 of
The data compression unit shown in
As shown in
The data for a single channel is input to both a bit predictor element 1902 and an x-bit remapping element 1904. The operation of the x-bit remapping element is controlled based on an input from the bit predictor element 1902, referred to as the mapping parameter. This mapping parameter specifies a data conversion or truncation operation that is performed by the x-bit remapping element 1904 and in particular, this mapping parameter specifies the value x. By selecting a lower value of x, the amount of data compression that is achieved is increased, however, the accuracy is reduced since the remapping is a lossy operation. The data conversion operation that is performed by the x-bit remapping element 1904 may also include operations such as low pass filtering where the mapping parameter, x, determines how heavily filtered the data is.
The operation of the bit predictor element 1902 is shown in
In examples where the data compression within the bit predictor element 1902 is performed using a lossless compression method such as the method described in UK Patent Number GB2530312 or the method described below with reference to
The comparison to the plurality of thresholds (in block 1926) may, for example, be implemented as set out in the following pseudo-code (or its functional equivalent), where Chan Size is the total size of the compressed data for the channel:
and in various examples, a look-up table may be used. The pseudo-code (or look-up table) comprises at least two rows but may comprise many more rows. Furthermore, whilst the value of x is described herein as referring to an actual bit depth, in other examples the mapping parameter, x, may correspond to a set of different quantisations.
The values of each of the plurality of thresholds (e.g. AY, BY, CY, DY) used by the bit predictor element 1902 may be determined by compressing a large training set of images multiple times using different configurations of thresholds and analysing the resultant sizes of the compressed data, or the score of an image quality metric for a given target compression ratio. The thresholds may be set to achieve a particular compression threshold or target compression ratio or may be calibrated to minimise certain artefacts of loss compression such as block artefacts or banding. The thresholds may also be set such that only those blocks that do not compress well are quantised.
Having determined the mapping parameter (i.e. value of x) in the bit predictor element 1902, the x-bit remapping element 1904 converts the input data from its original format, which may be 8-bits per pixel to x-bits per pixel, where x is the mapping parameter. This conversion may, for example, use truncation or may alternatively use the method described above with reference to
The data that is generated by the x-bit remapping element 1904 is input to the data compression element 1906 that then compresses the data using a data compression method, such as the lossless compression method described in UK Patent Number GB2530312 or the method described below with reference to
In order that the data can subsequently be decompressed, it is necessary to include the value of x the compressed data in some way, so that the correct inverse mapping may be used.
If the compressed data has no redundancy that can be exploited, then the value x may instead be packed alongside the compressed data, e.g. occupying a header byte. This can be read at the point of decompression to determine which inverse mapping to perform after decompressing the block in order to map the data back up to its original precision.
It will be appreciated that whilst the description of
In examples where the source data is 10-bit data, rather than 8888 data, the data compression unit may include an additional pre-processing element, not shown in
In examples where the data compression unit shown in
The data compression unit shown in
A first example of a lossless compression method which may be implemented in the primary compression unit 202 (shown in
A second example of a lossless compression method which may be implemented in the primary compression unit 202 (shown in
The entropy encoding (in block 2028) is performed according to a variable-length coding (VLC) scheme, such that the entropy encoded values will most likely not all have the same number of bits. In general, more probable values are encoded with fewer bits. In this way, it is likely that the total number of bits used to encode all of the data values in a data block will be reduced by the entropy encoding. There are some situations where spatial decorrelation can expand data, and these situations can be treated as special cases (i.e. the data is treated differently to other cases) in order to limit the expansion.
VLC encoding can be reasonably straightforward to perform at a high rate, but VLC decoding at a matching rate can be significantly more difficult because the bit-boundaries between contiguously stored encoded data values are not known until the encoded data is analysed, i.e. the length of the encoded data values is not known until the encoded data is analysed. In particular, when encoding, multiple symbols can be mapped independently to their corresponding codes and code lengths, and then merged into a contiguous output bit stream. However, typically when decoding, each code in the encoded bit stream is examined sequentially in order to determine its length which, in turn, determines the location of the start of the next code. In other words, the bit-boundaries between the different encoded data values need to be found.
In this second example method, entropy encoding is performed on sets of data values (e.g. 2×2 sets of data values). For each set of data values an indication is included in an encoded output (e.g. in a header section thereof) to indicate how many bits are used for each of the encoded data values representing the set of data values. The encoded data values are then included in the encoded output in accordance with the indicated numbers of bits. This system means that the decoding of the encoded data values is simplified (compared to the system of UK patent number 2530312) because a simple read of the indications (e.g. in the header) allows the bit boundaries between different encoded data values to be determined. In other words the indications allow the sizes of the corresponding encoded data sections to be quickly determined (e.g. in just a single clock cycle). This is described below in more detail with reference to
The block of data values is received at an entropy encoding module 2006 (block 2202). The rows and columns of the block are arranged as shown in
In the example shown in
As described above, the data values are unsigned with a distribution which is biased towards zero (due to the colour correlation and spatial decorrelation processes). Therefore, data values are likely to have leading zeroes. Therefore, the data values can be compressed simply by removing one or more leading zeroes from the data values (where possible). An indication is used to indicate how many leading zeroes have been removed.
The top left set of four data values are treated differently in that: (a) the top left pixel is used as the reference and stored separately, and (b) the remaining three values have a different encoding scheme that has been “trained” on a large set of image data so that: (i) for alignment purposes, the total number of bits used to represent the three values is a multiple of 4 (this matches the 2×2 blocks), and (ii) the total storage cost (for the training image set) has been minimised. The particular set of data values in the top left of the block is processed (block 2206). Specifically, an indication for the particular set is included in the size indication field 2114 (block 2208). Each indication in the size indication field has three bits, for a respective set of data values in the block 2100. This 3-bit indication can be used as an index into a Look Up Table to retrieve a number of bits for each data value in the particular set, such that the number of bits for each value is sufficient to store that value. There are sixteen sets of data values in the block 2100, such that the size indication field comprises 48 bits (i.e. 3*16 bits), or 6 bytes. The fifteen sets of four data values in a block will be encoded with numbers of bits which are multiples of four (because, as described below, each encoded data value in a set of four data values has the same number of bits), and on any given row each of these fifteen sets contribute a multiple of two bits. To maintain a convenient alignment of compressed data (as restricting alignment of data can reduce hardware complexity) restrictions are applied to the available choices for the top-left set which only has 3 elements. The top left set has three data values, one of which (E0) is in row 0. For hardware efficiency, it is desirable that the total data for a row is an even number of bits, so the possible lengths of the encoded data values which can be used to represent this data value are restricted to even numbers. Similarly, the combined lengths of the two encoded data values which are used to represent the other two data values of this set (A4 and E4) sum to an even value. Furthermore, in this example, the combined length of all the encoded data values in the encoded data output will be rounded up to the nearest byte (so that the encoded data outputs are aligned on byte boundaries), and all of the other sets of data values in the block. Therefore, the total number of bits used to encode the top left set of data values is also a multiple of four.
With a size indicator including three bits, eight sets of lengths for the encoded data values can be set. For example, the table below shows some possible lengths of the encoded data values which may be represented by the eight different size indications for the top left block. The lengths shown in the table below were made by evaluating a very large set of images and choosing the combinations (from a very large set of possible combinations) that resulted in the lowest overall storage costs.
The entropy encoding module 2006 chooses the coding from the possible options (e.g. as shown in the table above) with the least total length that is able to (losslessly) represent the {E0,A4,E4} triple by removing leading zeroes from the data values. In the event of a tie (e.g. if deciding between size indications 011 and 100 in the example shown in the table above) either tied code could be chosen, but as an example, the code with the least numerical encoding may be chosen (e.g. 011).
The encoded data values for the top left set are included in the variable size field 2116 (e.g. at the start of the variable size field 2116) of the encoded data output 2110 (block 2210).
The remaining (e.g. fifteen) sets of data values in the block 2100 are then processed (block 2212). Specifically, a number of bits (e.g. a minimum number of bits) for representing the maximum value of the data values of a set is determined (block 2214), and an indication of the determined number of bits is included in the size indication field 2114 of the encoded data output 2110 for the set (block 2216). Block 2214 may be implemented by finding which of the data values in the set has the smallest number of leading zeros, and then by identifying the smallest available encoding that will suffice. It is noted that not all possible data lengths may be available to be encoded. For example, as described in the example below, a data length of seven bits is not available to be encoded. Therefore, the determined number of bits may be a minimum “valid” number of bits which can be used to represent the maximum value of the received data values in the set, wherein a number of bits is valid if it can be indicated by an indication to be included in the size indication field 2114. For example, there may be a predetermined set of valid numbers of bits which can be indicated by said indication (e.g. as listed in the table above), and the minimum valid number of bits may be the minimum of the valid numbers of bits in the predetermined set which is sufficient to represent the maximum value of the received data values in the set.
When the number of bits which is to be used to represent each of the encoded data values in a set has been determined, some leading zeroes can be removed from each of the data values in the set (if appropriate) to thereby determine the encoded data values, such that each of the encoded data values in a set has the determined number of bits for that set.
The encoded data values representing the data values in the set are included in the variable size field 2116 of the encoded data output 2110 (block 2218). The order in which the encoded data values are included in the variable size field 2116 is predetermined and corresponds with the order in which the indications are included in the size indication field 2114, such that when the encoded data values are decoded, the positions of the decoded data values within the block are known.
For example, if the four data values in a set are 00000011, 00000100, 00000001 and 00000000, then 00000100 is the maximum value in the set, and three is the minimum number of bits that can be used to represent the maximum value. Three is a valid number of bits in the example shown in the table above in the sense that an indication can be included to indicate that each of the encoded data values of the set have three bits. Therefore, five leading zeroes can be removed from each of the data values in the set. Therefore, the encoded data values for the set are 011, 100, 001 and 000, and these encoded data values are included in the variable size field 2116. An indication (e.g. 011) to indicate that three bits are used to represent each encoded data value in the set is included in the size indication field 2114. Different sets (e.g. 2×2 sets) can use different numbers of bits for their encoded data values, and each set has its own indication in the size indication field 1304 to indicate how many bits are used in the variable size field 2116 for the encoded data values of that set.
As an example, the table below shows how the indications may correspond to numbers of bits for the 2×2 sets.
It is noted that there is no indication to indicate that seven bits are used for each encoded data value. Therefore, in this example, if the maximum 8-bit value within a set has just one leading zero then the minimum valid number of bits which can be used to represent each of the encoded data values in that set is eight (not seven). This omission of seven from the predetermined set of valid lengths for encoded data values was chosen by examining all the possible choices of number of 3 bits to a set of 8 choices. Since there are 9 options (bit lengths 0 to 8), one option is left out. Having evaluated all the possibilities (e.g. trialing leaving out 0, or 1, or 2 . . . ) against a large test suite of images, it was confirmed that leaving out “7” gives the best level of compression. It is noted that the likelihood of data values having only one leading zero is small because the colour decorrelation and the spatial decorrelation processes cause the data values to be biased towards zero.
It should be apparent that the examples described herein relate to 8-bit data values, but in other examples, the data values may include different numbers of bits (e.g. 6-bit data values), and a person skilled in the art would be able to modify the disclosure provided herein to operate with these different numbers of bits.
For example, if each of the data values received from a spatial decorrelation module has n bits, and the determined minimum valid number of bits for a particular set of received data values is m, where m≤n, then each of the received data values of the particular set has at least (n−m) leading zeroes. In this case, each of the encoded data values for the particular set consists of the m least significant bits of a corresponding n-bit received data value of the particular set. Referring to the same example as above, if the four n-bit data values (where n=8) in a set are 00000011, 00000100, 00000001 and 00000000, then the determined minimum valid number of bits for representing the maximum value of the set, m=3. A data length of 3-bits per encoded data value is a valid encoding from the table above. Each of the data values has at least five leading zeroes. Therefore, the m-bit encoded data values for the set are 011, 100, 001 and 000.
Different sets within the block 2100 can be processed in parallel by an entropy encoding module 2006. For example, the indications for the different sets within the block 2100 can be determined and included in the size indication field 2114 in parallel operations within the entropy encoding module 2006. However, since the encoded data values can have variable lengths, they are included in the variable size field 2116 in a predetermined sequence.
When all of the encoded data values of the block have been included in the encoded data output 2110 then, the encoded data output is outputted from the entropy encoding module 2006 (block 2220). The encoded data output representing a block of pixel values is provided to the packing module 2008 for each of the colour channels, where they are packed together. For example, the packing module 2008 places the encoded data outputs for the block of data values from the different colour channels into a data packet. In other words, a plurality of encoded data outputs are formed for a respective plurality of colour channels relating to the same pixels, and the plurality of encoded data outputs for a group of pixels (e.g. an 8×8 block) are packed together into a data packet for storage. The encoded data block can then be sent for storage in the memory 106, e.g. via the memory interface 114 (as shown in
A header is stored with a group of encoded data blocks, e.g. the data blocks representing an image or a frame. For each encoded data block (e.g. each 8×8 block of encoded data values), a header indication is included in the header to indicate the size of the compressed data for the respective encoded data block. The header is stored separately from the encoded data values (e.g. in a dedicated portion of the encoded data output), and due to its small size, a significant portion of the header data may remain resident in a cache within the GPU. The header allows the size of the encoded data block to be known before the encoded data block is retrieved from memory, so an encoded data block can be retrieved without retrieving extraneous data. This is very useful for allowing random access to different parts of encoded data. In general, any number of bits may be used in the header as a header indication for a respective encoded data block, but in a specific example described below, four bits are used for each of the header indications.
As noted above, whilst the method described above with reference to
Any reference to particular logic gates above (e.g. OR, AND gates, etc.) is by way of example only and it will be appreciated that they may be replaced by logic elements that provide the same functionality and may be more broadly referred to as logic blocks.
The description above describes many different methods, including methods of data compression (e.g.
The data compression hardware of
The data compression and decompression hardware described herein (including any hardware that is arranged to implement any of the methods described above) may be embodied in hardware on an integrated circuit. The data compression and decompression hardware described herein may be configured to perform any of the methods described herein. Generally, any of the functions, methods, techniques or components described above can be implemented in software, firmware, hardware (e.g., fixed logic circuitry), or any combination thereof. The terms “module,” “functionality,” “component”, “element”, “unit”, “block” and “logic” may be used herein to generally represent software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof. In the case of a software implementation, the module, functionality, component, element, unit, block or logic represents program code that performs the specified tasks when executed on a processor. The algorithms and methods described herein could be performed by one or more processors executing code that causes the processor(s) to perform the algorithms/methods. Examples of a computer-readable storage medium include a random-access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), an optical disc, flash memory, hard disk memory, and other memory devices that may use magnetic, optical, and other techniques to store instructions or other data and that can be accessed by a machine.
The terms computer program code and computer readable instructions as used herein refer to any kind of executable code for processors, including code expressed in a machine language, an interpreted language or a scripting language. Executable code includes binary code, machine code, bytecode, code defining an integrated circuit (such as a hardware description language or netlist), and code expressed in a programming language code such as C, Java or OpenCL. Executable code may be, for example, any kind of software, firmware, script, module or library which, when suitably executed, processed, interpreted, compiled, executed at a virtual machine or other software environment, cause a processor of the computer system at which the executable code is supported to perform the tasks specified by the code.
A processor, computer, or computer system may be any kind of device, machine or dedicated circuit, or collection or portion thereof, with processing capability such that it can execute instructions. A processor may be any kind of general purpose or dedicated processor, such as a CPU, GPU, System-on-chip, state machine, media processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic array, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), physics processing units (PPUs), radio processing units (RPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), general purpose processors (e.g. a general purpose GPU), microprocessors, any processing unit which is designed to accelerate tasks outside of a CPU, etc. A computer or computer system may comprise one or more processors. Those skilled in the art will realize that such processing capabilities are incorporated into many different devices and therefore the term ‘computer’ includes set top boxes, media players, digital radios, PCs, servers, mobile telephones, personal digital assistants and many other devices.
It is also intended to encompass software which defines a configuration of hardware as described herein, such as HDL (hardware description language) software, as is used for designing integrated circuits, or for configuring programmable chips, to carry out desired functions. That is, there may be provided a computer readable storage medium having encoded thereon computer readable program code in the form of an integrated circuit definition dataset that when processed (i.e. run) in an integrated circuit manufacturing system configures the system to manufacture data compression and/or decompression hardware configured to perform any of the methods described herein, or to manufacture data compression and/or decompression hardware comprising any apparatus described herein. An integrated circuit definition dataset may be, for example, an integrated circuit description.
Therefore, there may be provided a method of manufacturing, at an integrated circuit manufacturing system, data compression and/or decompression hardware as described herein. Furthermore, there may be provided an integrated circuit definition dataset that, when processed in an integrated circuit manufacturing system, causes the method of manufacturing data compression and/or decompression hardware to be performed.
An integrated circuit definition dataset may be in the form of computer code, for example as a netlist, code for configuring a programmable chip, as a hardware description language defining an integrated circuit at any level, including as register transfer level (RTL) code, as high-level circuit representations such as Verilog or VHDL, and as low-level circuit representations such as OASIS® and GDSII. Higher level representations which logically define an integrated circuit (such as RTL) may be processed at a computer system configured for generating a manufacturing definition of an integrated circuit in the context of a software environment comprising definitions of circuit elements and rules for combining those elements in order to generate the manufacturing definition of an integrated circuit so defined by the representation. As is typically the case with software executing at a computer system so as to define a machine, one or more intermediate user steps (e.g. providing commands, variables etc.) may be required in order for a computer system configured for generating a manufacturing definition of an integrated circuit to execute code defining an integrated circuit so as to generate the manufacturing definition of that integrated circuit.
An example of processing an integrated circuit definition dataset at an integrated circuit manufacturing system so as to configure the system to manufacture data compression and/or decompression hardware will now be described with respect to
The layout processing system 2404 is configured to receive and process the IC definition dataset to determine a circuit layout. Methods of determining a circuit layout from an IC definition dataset are known in the art, and for example may involve synthesising RTL code to determine a gate level representation of a circuit to be generated, e.g. in terms of logical components (e.g. NAND, NOR, AND, OR, MUX and FLIP-FLOP components). A circuit layout can be determined from the gate level representation of the circuit by determining positional information for the logical components. This may be done automatically or with user involvement in order to optimise the circuit layout. When the layout processing system 2404 has determined the circuit layout it may output a circuit layout definition to the IC generation system 2406. A circuit layout definition may be, for example, a circuit layout description.
The IC generation system 2406 generates an IC according to the circuit layout definition, as is known in the art. For example, the IC generation system 2406 may implement a semiconductor device fabrication process to generate the IC, which may involve a multiple-step sequence of photo lithographic and chemical processing steps during which electronic circuits are gradually created on a wafer made of semiconducting material. The circuit layout definition may be in the form of a mask which can be used in a lithographic process for generating an IC according to the circuit definition. Alternatively, the circuit layout definition provided to the IC generation system 2406 may be in the form of computer-readable code which the IC generation system 2406 can use to form a suitable mask for use in generating an IC.
The different processes performed by the IC manufacturing system 2402 may be implemented all in one location, e.g. by one party. Alternatively, the IC manufacturing system 2402 may be a distributed system such that some of the processes may be performed at different locations, and may be performed by different parties. For example, some of the stages of: (i) synthesising RTL code representing the IC definition dataset to form a gate level representation of a circuit to be generated, (ii) generating a circuit layout based on the gate level representation, (iii) forming a mask in accordance with the circuit layout, and (iv) fabricating an integrated circuit using the mask, may be performed in different locations and/or by different parties.
In other examples, processing of the integrated circuit definition dataset at an integrated circuit manufacturing system may configure the system to manufacture data compression and/or decompression hardware without the IC definition dataset being processed so as to determine a circuit layout. For instance, an integrated circuit definition dataset may define the configuration of a reconfigurable processor, such as an FPGA, and the processing of that dataset may configure an IC manufacturing system to generate a reconfigurable processor having that defined configuration (e.g. by loading configuration data to the FPGA).
In some embodiments, an integrated circuit manufacturing definition dataset, when processed in an integrated circuit manufacturing system, may cause an integrated circuit manufacturing system to generate a device as described herein. For example, the configuration of an integrated circuit manufacturing system in the manner described above with respect to
In some examples, an integrated circuit definition dataset could include software which runs on hardware defined at the dataset or in combination with hardware defined at the dataset. In the example shown in
Those skilled in the art will realize that storage devices utilized to store program instructions can be distributed across a network. For example, a remote computer may store an example of the process described as software. A local or terminal computer may access the remote computer and download a part or all of the software to run the program. Alternatively, the local computer may download pieces of the software as needed, or execute some software instructions at the local terminal and some at the remote computer (or computer network). Those skilled in the art will also realize that by utilizing conventional techniques known to those skilled in the art that all, or a portion of the software instructions may be carried out by a dedicated circuit, such as a DSP, programmable logic array, or the like.
The applicant hereby discloses in isolation each individual feature described herein and any combination of two or more such features, to the extent that such features or combinations are capable of being carried out based on the present specification as a whole in the light of the common general knowledge of a person skilled in the art, irrespective of whether such features or combinations of features solve any problems disclosed herein. In view of the foregoing description it will be evident to a person skilled in the art that various modifications may be made within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. 120 of copending application Ser. No. 17/588,014 filed Jan. 28, 2022, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,677,415, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 17/019,640 filed Sep. 14, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,258,457, which is a continuation of prior application Ser. No. 16/456,277 filed Jun. 28, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,812,101, which claims foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 from United Kingdom Application No. 1810790.4 filed Jun. 29, 2018, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2673065 | Patterson | Mar 1954 | A |
5073776 | Shigemori | Dec 1991 | A |
5218563 | Juri et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5299208 | Blaum et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5673065 | DeLeeuw | Sep 1997 | A |
5751359 | Suzuki et al. | May 1998 | A |
5809200 | Nishimoto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5859857 | Martinson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6137912 | Kostrzewski | Oct 2000 | A |
6580755 | Morimoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583887 | Clouthier et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6771727 | Haverinen | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6771827 | Curry | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7245663 | Schaar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7920749 | Donovan | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8428371 | Morovic et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
9215505 | Pelerin | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9275605 | Longhurst et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9451254 | Joshi | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9998142 | Gopal | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10225569 | Okamoto et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10707895 | Fenney | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10720940 | Fenney et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10812101 | Lacey et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10819367 | Fenney et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10895776 | Fenney | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11070227 | Fenney et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11258457 | Lacey et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11309907 | Fenney et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20030030575 | Frachtenberg et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030090397 | Rasmussen | May 2003 | A1 |
20040042292 | Sakata et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040189679 | Ito et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050200631 | Pan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060115166 | Sung et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060164268 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060256380 | Klassen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277237 | Kuo et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070041657 | Rychagov et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070098283 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070206868 | Nakayama | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080068231 | Kuhns | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080253448 | Lin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090317008 | Cho et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100260429 | Ichinose | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100303148 | Hiron et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332956 | Alrod et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019736 | Koyabu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110103703 | Karlov | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150074 | Wang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120120287 | Funamoto et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120224627 | Srinivasan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120230595 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120271802 | Oh | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120300792 | Patel et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130002703 | Tripathi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010864 | Teng | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034309 | Nystad et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130272626 | Robinson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140002846 | Kondo | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140029846 | Su et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140056577 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140092867 | Yu et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140177730 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184612 | Dunaisky et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140307962 | Seikh | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150103878 | Ramasubramonian et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150138218 | Jeong et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138237 | Ghosh et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150172670 | Li et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150277776 | Okamoto et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160006456 | Muramatsu et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160057437 | Jeong et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160179469 | Burgess et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160321772 | Adsumilli | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353117 | Seregin | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170025098 | Keramidas et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170177227 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170230586 | Takahashi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180054630 | Chang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180139446 | Abello et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190027082 | Belle | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190325613 | Wu et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200007149 | Fenney | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200007150 | Lacey et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200007151 | Fenney et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200007156 | Fenney | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200007866 | Martinelli et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200090615 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200252639 | Han et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210006261 | Lacey et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210036713 | Fenney et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210067172 | Fenney | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20220158653 | Lacey et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101106709 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101283605 | Oct 2008 | CN |
101653005 | Feb 2010 | CN |
102036059 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102289829 | Dec 2011 | CN |
103210418 | Jul 2013 | CN |
105379266 | Mar 2016 | CN |
106095365 | Nov 2016 | CN |
106993144 | Jul 2017 | CN |
107567709 | Jan 2018 | CN |
106233632 | Aug 2019 | CN |
053010 | Jan 1985 | EP |
0539010 | Apr 1993 | EP |
1465418 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2670139 | Dec 2013 | EP |
3367683 | Aug 2018 | EP |
2339989 | Feb 2000 | GB |
2530312 | Mar 2016 | GB |
2550965 | Dec 2017 | GB |
9956239 | Nov 1999 | WO |
1999056239 | Nov 1999 | WO |
03096320 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2003096320 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004091221 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2008051350 | May 2008 | WO |
2013006370 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2014092867 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2017199210 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018194815 | Oct 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
HalCanary: “SklmageInfo Reference”; Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://github.com/google/skia/bloblmasterliteluserlapi/SklmageInfo_Reference.md; Jan. 26, 2018; 47 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230327682 A1 | Oct 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17588014 | Jan 2022 | US |
Child | 18208739 | US | |
Parent | 17019640 | Sep 2020 | US |
Child | 17588014 | US | |
Parent | 16456277 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 17019640 | US |