Wireless communication systems can provide a number of different voice communication services, including interconnect voice communication services and dispatch voice communication services. Interconnect voice communication services are those that are provided by most wireless communication systems, and are commonly considered as full-duplex, circuit-switched communications. Dispatch communication services are provided in only some wireless communication systems, and are commonly referred to as push-to-talk or walkie-talkie calls due to the half-duplex nature of the calls.
Dispatch communication services have typically been provided only in private wireless networks. For many years wireless networks based on the iDEN standard were the only publicly-accessible wireless networks that provided both dispatch and interconnect communication services. Recently wireless networks based on other wireless communication standards have incorporated dispatch communication services in addition to interconnect communication services. These newer dispatch communication services are based on, for example, Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Push-to-Talk over Cellular (PoC) standards-based protocols.
One characteristic of the iDEN network is that it provides guaranteed talk permit and forced audio for dispatch communications. Guaranteed talk permit means that when a dispatch communication is setup the network verifies that the terminating communication unit is available (i.e., is registered with the network and radio frequency resources are available) and provides a confirmation tone to the originating communication unit. The user of the terminating communication unit is not typically involved in the call setup process. The originator of the communication can then send audio to the terminating communication unit, and this audio is automatically output without any action on the part of the user of the terminating communication unit. Hence the name forced audio.
The PoC standard provides three different call answering modes, auto answer, manual answer and manual answer override, none of which provide guaranteed talk permit with forced audio.
As illustrated in
Manual answer override is a calling mode set by an originating communication unit indicating that even if the terminating communication unit is set to manual answer, the terminating PoC server will respond to the originating PoC server that the terminating user is available, before the terminating PoC server has determined whether radio frequency resources are available to support the terminating communication unit
Because the iDEN network was optimized to support both interconnect and dispatch communications, the network could provide a dispatch call setup with guaranteed talk permit and forced audio in less than one second. Networks designed in accordance with the PoC standard, however, are not optimized for dispatch communications, and accordingly various techniques are employed to provide a similar feel to the less than one second call setup time that is provided by the iDEN network. One of these techniques is the auto answer mode, which, as described above, indicates to the originating communication unit that the communication has been setup, even before making this actual determination. This provides the user of the originating communication unit with the feeling of a fast communication setup, but can greatly disappoint a user when the communication fails. In contrast, the manual answer answering mode provides guaranteed talk permit, but does not provide the fast communication setup provided by the iDEN network.
Exemplary embodiments provide systems and method for guaranteed talk permit with forced audio in a dispatch communication network that operates using the PoC standard. A communication unit can set a forced audio answer mode that provides guaranteed talk permit with forced audio. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention the dispatch communication unit indicates to a PoC server that the answer mode is set to manual answer. When a dispatch communication setup message is sent to the communication unit, the communication unit automatically responds, without requiring any action on the part of a user of the communication unit during the dispatch communication setup process. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the dispatch communication unit can indicate to the PoC server that the answer mode is a forced audio mode. Accordingly, even when a dispatch communication setup request indicates a manual answer override, the PoC server will still forward the call setup message to the communication unit to confirm that communication unit and radio frequency resources are available for the dispatch communication.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In response to receipt of the SIP INVITE message setting up a dispatch communication, logic 312 of the terminating communication unit determines that the answering mode is set to forced audio and logic 314 automatically responds (step 408) by sending a SIP 200 OK message (step 410a). The user of the terminating communication unit is not required to perform any action as part of the call setup procedure, in contrast to the conventional PoC manual answer mode that requires the user to accept the incoming dispatch communication.
The terminating PoC server forwards the SIP 200 OK message to the originating PoC server (step 410b), which then sends a SIP NOTIFY message to the originating communication unit (step 412). The originating communication unit then outputs a setup confirmation tone (step 414) indicating that the terminating communication unit is available and ready to receive media. After sending acknowledgement and receiving the floor grant message, the originating communication unit can provide media, which is automatically output by the terminating communication unit (step 416). Prior to receiving the media, the user of the terminating communication unit can be notified when the call setup process has been successfully completed.
The remainder of the call flow of
It should be recognized that certain terminology has been used for ease of description and should not be interpreted as limiting. For example, communication units and PoC servers have been denoted as originating or terminating in the exemplary call flows, however, an originating communication unit and PoC server can, for other dispatch communications, be a terminating communication unit and PoC server. Likewise, a terminating communication unit and PoC server can, for other dispatch communications, be an originating communication unit and PoC server.
Although not described above in connection with
Although exemplary embodiments have been described in connection with particular messages being exchanged, such as SIP messages, the present invention is not so limited. Instead, any type of messages can be employed within the scope of the present invention. For example, sending the SIP INVITE message in steps 406b and 510 and the automatic response by the terminating communication unit can be replaced by any message and/or procedure for determining that the radio frequency resources for the terminating communication unit are available for the dispatch communication in the methods of
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6571290 | Selgas et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6640109 | Drozt et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6765882 | Rittle et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6904285 | Drozt et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7142856 | Barrow | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7295851 | Liu et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7395075 | Posner et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7499719 | Rengaraju et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7555304 | Schwagmann et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567816 | Hasegawa | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570966 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7636581 | Choksi et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7684805 | Zhao et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20030002449 | Rittle et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030087648 | Mezhvinsky et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030236093 | Drozt et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050075121 | Hasegawa | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050239486 | D'Avello et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261015 | Schwagmann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050287997 | Fournier | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060058025 | Barrow | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079244 | Posner et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060142037 | Sung et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060221890 | Qian et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229883 | VanderBaan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060293073 | Rengaraju et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070254605 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281722 | Gao | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004038 | Dunko | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080076403 | Park et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080146207 | Razdan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090270049 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090299941 | McColgan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100071027 | Agulnik et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |